Republic of the Philippines

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM (with sample computation)

SY: __________________

School: DULAG SPED CENTER District: DULAG SOUTH

Division: LEYTE Date of Assessment/Validation:_____________

Part – I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.

2017-2018 319 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)

2018-2019 425 33.23 2-average (at least 5% increase)
2019-2020 414 -2.29 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase = 15.23% High = 3

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout % of Decrease Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 7.06)
2017-2018 .01 4.94/7.06(100) = 69.97 ; 4.94 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.);
2018-2019 .02 2.94/7.06(100) = 41.64 ; 2.94 (2% dec.)
2019-2020 .02 -2.06/7.06 (100) = -29.17% ; -2.06 2-average (at least 50% dec); (4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease = 27.48% ; 1.94% 0
School Year Completion % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2017-2018 98.89 -8/75(100) = -10.66 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2018-2019 87.78 -5/75(100) = -6.66 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2019-2020 95.43 3/75 (100) = 4% 3-high (at least 10 increase)
Average Increase = -13.32% 0
School Year Cohort % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Surv. Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2017-2018 46 5/75 (100) = 6.66% 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2018-2019 79 12/75 (100) = 16% 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2019-2020 89 3/75 (100) = 4% 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase = 8.88% Average = 2
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR + CR + CSR / 3 = 0 + 0 + 2 = 2 /3 = = .66

C. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67% Sec. = 48%
2017-2018 45 -2/67(100) = -2.98% 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem.; 7%
2018-2019 69 11/67(100) = 16.41% Sec. increase)
2019-2020 3/67 (100) = 4.47% 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
Sec. increase)
3-high (at least 7% Elem.; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase = 5.97% Average = 2

SUMMARY:
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45% 3 x 0.45 1.35
Efficiency 25% .66 x 0.25 0.165
Quality 30% 2 x 0.30 0.6
Total 100% 2.115 = Better
INTERPRETATION: ______________
Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment
Better: 1.5 – 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 – 3.0
Sample Score Sheet for Part-II
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1=2 2x2=4 1x3=3
Average Rating 2+4+3/5 = 1.8
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
6 
7 
Computation per Level 4x1 2x2 1x3
Average Rating 4+4+3/7 = 1.57
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1 3x2 0
Average Rating 2+6+0/5 = 1.6
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1 
2 
3 
4 
5 
Computation per Level 2x1 1x2 2x3
Average Rating 2+2+6/5 = 2.0

SUMMARY:
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30% 1.8 x 0.3 0.54
B 30% 1.57 x 0.3 0.471
C 25% 1.6 x 0.25 0.40
D 15% 2.0 x 0.15 0. 30
Total 100% 1.711 = Better

INTERPRETATION: ________________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49

Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60% 2.115 x 0.60 1.269
Part – II SBM Practice 40% 1.711 x 0.40 0.684
Total 100% 1. 953 = Maturing

SBM LEVEL: II__

Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49

Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0
Certified Correct by the School Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Validated by Division Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________
 Republic of the Philippines
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Regional Office VIII (Eastern Visayas)
Government Center, Candahug, Palo, Leyte

SBM LEVEL OF PRACTICE VALIDATION FORM

SY: __________________

School:______________________________________ District:_______________________________
Division :_____________________________________ Date of Assessment/Validation:_____________

Part – I:
A. ACCESS
School Year Enrolment % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 3% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 5% increase)
20156-2016 3-high (at least 7% increase)
Average % of Increase

B. EFFICIENCY
School Year Dropout % of Decrease Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 7.06)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 25% dec.);
2014-2015 (2% dec.)
2015-2016 2-average (at least 50% dec); (4%
dec)
3-high (has 0 dropout or 100%
dec); (7.06% dec)
Average Decrease
School Year Completion % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Rate (Baseline - 75%)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2015-2016 3-high (at least 10 increase)
Average Increase
School Year Cohort % of Increase Formula: (A-B)/B(100) Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Surv. Rate (Baseline - 76%)
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 5% increase)
2014-2015 2-average (at least 7% increase)
2015-2016 3-high (at least 10% increase)
Average Increase
Average EFFICIENCY Rating DR + CR + CSR / 3 =

C. QUALITY
School Year NAT MPS % of Increase Rating & Equiv. Pts.
Baseline: Elem. = 67% Sec. = 48%
2013-2014 1-marginal (at least 2% Elem.; 7%
2014-2015 Sec. increase)
2015-2016 2-average (at least 5% Elem.; 8%
Sec. increase)
3-high (at least 7% Elem.; 10%
Sec. increase)
Average Increase

SUMMARY:
Category Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Access 45%
Efficiency 25%
Quality 30%
Total 100%
INTERPRETATION: ______________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49 Formula: where A= Accomplishment

Better: 1.5 – 2.49 B= Baseline
Best: 2.5 – 3.0
Sample Score Sheet for Part-II
Indicator Level I Level II Level III
A. LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
B. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Computation per Level
Average Rating
C. ACCOUNTABILITY AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating
D. MANAGEMENT OF RESOURCES
1
2
3
4
5
Computation per Level
Average Rating

SUMMARY:
Principle Weight Ave. Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
A 30% x 0.3
B 30% x 0.3
C 25% x 0.25
D 15% x 0.15
Total 100%

INTERPRETATION: ________________

Legend: Good: 0.5 – 1.49

Better: 1.5 – 2.49
Best: 2.5 – 3.0

OVERALL ASSESSMENT:
Area Weight Rating x Weight Weighted Rating
Part – I Performance Improvement 60% x 0.60
Part – II SBM Practice 40% x 0.40
Total 100%

SBM LEVEL: _

Legend: Level I “Developing”: 0.5 – 1.49

Level II “Maturing”: 1.5 – 2.49
Level III “Advanced: 2.5 – 3.0
Certified Correct by the School Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________

Validated by Division Assessment Committee:

_______________________________________ __________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

_______________________________________ ___________________________________________

________________________________________ ___________________________________________