Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 55

1

CHAPTER 1

THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

This chapter discusses the background of the study, statement of the

problem, significance of the study, scope and limitation, conceptual framework

and definition of terms.

Background of the Study

Educational institutions are the true seats of learning. They serve as

students’ second home and hone their academic skills, abilities and values. In

order to mold students, these educational institutions or schools should provide

excellent service quality. This excellence in service quality is what students and

parents look for in a school. As stated by Zeithaml et al. (2006), service quality is

one of the strong competitive strategies for educational institutions.

Indeed, educational institutions strive to provide excellent service quality

to have the competitive edge. With the emergence of a great number of

universities and colleges, competition has become tougher and these institutions

have become more concerned about the quality of service they offer. As

mentioned by Prabha et al. (2009), measuring the service quality of educational

institutions has recently been the focus of attention of many studies.

This is one of such studies. As students, the researchers are concerned

about the quality of service offered by their school, Rogationist College. Like

other schools, Rogationist College aim to provide excellent service to its

students. It measures this service quality through performance evaluation, one of


2

which is the Y-SPEAK. This is a semestral activity conducted by the Office for

Student Affairs wherein students voice out their concerns, suggestions and

recommendations relative to the school’s facilities, service personnel and the

overall service provided by the school. Results of the past Y-SPEAKs have

shown that the students are generally satisfied with the quality of service offered

to them. However, based on the students’ feedback, there are some services that

need improvement. For this reason, the researchers came up with this study to

evaluate the service quality of Rogationist College school services and identify

the services that can still be improved.

Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to evaluate the service quality of Rogationist College

school services. Specifically, this study sought to answer the following:

1. What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of the following?

1.1. Age

1.2. Gender

2. What is the evaluation of service quality in different offices of the Rogationist

College in terms of the following?

2.1. Reliability

2.2. Assurance

2.3. Tangibility

2.4. Empathy

2.5. Responsiveness
3

Significance of the Study

This study about the evaluation on the service quality of school services in

Rogationist College will be beneficial to the following:

School Administrators

This study will be beneficial to the school administrators as the results will

provide them information about the quality of school services and guide them on

what actions to take to improve these services.

School Offices

The result of the study will be beneficial to different offices of Rogationist

College as it may serve as basis for the improvement of their services and it can

strengthen the services in which the offices are proficient.

Students

This study will be beneficial to the students since they are the direct

receivers of the service when the service quality of school offices improves.

Future Researchers

This research may serve as reference or guide for students who will be

conducting related study in the future.

Scope and Limitation

Generally, the study focused on the evaluation of service quality of

Rogationist College school services. It aimed to determine the demographic

profile of the respondents in terms of age and gender. It also evaluated the

service quality of the different offices of the school in terms of reliability,


4

assurance, tangibility, empathy and responsiveness. Selected college and

technical education department students of Rogationist College academic year

2016-2017 served as the respondents in the study.

Conceptual Framework of the Study

The research paradigm of the study is illustrated in Figure 1.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT


1. Demographic profile
of the respondents in
terms of:
1.1. Age
1.2. Gender

2. Service quality in Data gathering Evaluation of Service


different office of the Analysis Quality of Rogationist
school in terms of the Sorting College School
following: Interpretation Services
2.1 Reliability
2.2 Assurance
2.3 Tangibility
2.4 Empathy
4
2.5 Responsiveness

Figure 1. Research Paradigm

The input included the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of

age and gender and the service quality in different offices of the school. The

offices were evaluated in terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and

responsiveness. An adapted survey questionnaire was used and data from this

were sorted, analyzed, and interpreted. Lastly, the output of this study was the

evaluation of service quality of Rogationist College school services.

Definition of Terms
5

For better understanding of this study, the following terms are conceptually

and operationally defined:

Age refers to the length of time during which a being or thing has existed.

Assurance refers to the behavior of the personnel that will give students

confidence in the office and make students feel safe.

Empathy refers to the ability of the personnel to understand students’ problems

and performs in their best interest as well as giving students individual personal

attention and having convenient operating hour.

Gender refers to the male or female division of a species, especially as

differentiated by social and cultural roles and behavior.

RATER Scale refers to an instrument for measuring how students perceive the

quality of service. This instrument is based on the five (5) dimensions such as

reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and responsiveness.

Reliability refers to the ability of the personnel to provide its students with

accurate service the first time without making any mistakes and delivers what it

has promise to do by the time that has been agreed upon.

Responsiveness refers to the ability of the personnel who are willing to help

students and respond to the request as well as to inform students when service

will be provided.

School office refers to the different offices of the institution which includes

accounting and cashier, campus ministry, clinic, guidance, library, office of the

student discipline, and registrar’s office.


6

Service refers to a valuable action, deed, or effort performed to satisfy a need or

to fulfill a demand.

Service Quality refers to assessment of how well a delivered service conforms

to the students’ expectations.

Tangibility refers to the appeal of facilities, equipment and material used by the

office as well as to the appearance of service personnel.


7

CHAPTER 2

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURES AND STUDIES

This chapter contains information gathered from books, online sources

and other related studies and literatures that provided the researchers with the

necessary background knowledge for the study.

Service refers to an action performed to fulfill a demand. It is the most

important part of a service organization. Indeed, providing excellent service is the

intention of service organizations. As stated by Armstrong et al. (2010) these

organizations strive to provide excellent service quality so that they can

differentiate themselves from their competitors and that in order to provide

excellent service, they need to know the expectation of the target market with

regard to service quality and to monitor their service performance.

A service organization should determine the service quality that it gives to

its clients because this could give the organizations a basis for improving or

continuing the level of service sought by the clients. According to Lovelock and

Wirtz (2011), a service organization needs a common understanding on the

measurement of service quality as this would help in the identification of the

causes of service quality downfall. Also, it could help to design and implement

necessary actions.

Different tools or instruments are used in measuring the service quality of

a service organization. The most commonly used tool is the SERVQUAL model.

It is a tool used to measure the service quality in terms of five (5) dimensions.

According to Bateson and Hoffman (2012), SERVQUAL serves as a tool for the
8

organization to know its strengths and weaknesses. It is composed of five (5)

service quality dimensions namely tangibles, reliability, responsiveness,

assurance, and empathy. The said dimensions are considered in measuring the

expectations and perceptions of the customers.

Ulewicz (2014) aimed to evaluate the level of service quality given to the

students in Czestochowa University using the five (5) dimensions of service

quality namely reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness.

The results of the study showed that the students perceived an excellent service

in the dimension of reliability and responsiveness. They also revealed that the

university needs to put improvement on the dimensions of assurance, tangibility,

and empathy specifically, in instilling confidence to the students, in having

updated equipment, and in the way the personnel treat the students.

Likewise, the study of Chui et al. (2015) evaluated the service quality

given to the students studying in private institutions in Malaysia in the entire

school year 2014-2015. The study revealed that students perceived an excellent

service in the dimensions of reliability, tangibility and responsiveness. However,

assurance and empathy were the dimensions that needs to be improved

specifically in the courteousness and friendliness and being understanding of the

personnel.

Moreover, the study of Famacion-Quinco (2010) aimed to determine the

level of students' satisfaction towards the service quality of De La Salle

University. The researcher used the five (5) dimensions of service quality, namely

reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness to determine the


9

level of service quality as perceived by the students. The study revealed that the

students were moderately satisfied with the five (5) dimensions of service quality

of the university. Also, among the dimensions, assurance turned to be the

dimension in which students were most satisfied with.

In addition, the study of Green (2014) aimed to know the service quality

given to the students at Durban University of Technology in the academic year of

2013-2014. The study revealed that most of the respondents were in the age

bracket of 17-21 years. Moreover, the result shows that there are more female

respondents than male, covering more than half of the respondents. It was

revealed that students perceived excellent service in the dimension of assurance.

However, the overall results turned to be, students’ expectation exceeded

students’ perception which resulted to dissatisfaction of students to the Durban

University of Technology.

Similarly, the study of Chopra, Chawla and Sharma (2014) aimed to

determine the students’ perception of service quality at Indian State of Haryana in

the academic year 2013-2014. The result shows that among the five (5)

dimensions of service, empathy and reliability turned out to be negatively

perceived. The overall result of the service quality at Indian State of Haryana

turned to be negative which shows that the University have not met the

expectation of the students regarding the service quality given to them.

Further, the study of Khan, Ahmed and Nawaz (2011) aimed to determine

the impact of service quality on the level of satisfaction of the students. The study

revealed that on one hand, the dimensions of responsiveness, assurance,


10

empathy and reliability have significant relationship with the service quality

provided by the academic institution on the students’ perspective. On the other

hand, tangibility was the dimension least considered by the students when it

comes to the quality of service given to them.

Furthermore, the study of Seng and Ling (2013) aimed to analyze the

service quality rendered by the learning institution in Malaysia and its relationship

to student satisfaction. The study revealed that services offered by instructors,

learning resources and students’ engagement have positive relation with

students’ satisfaction.

The study of Kundi et al. (2014) also aimed to investigate the correlation of

service quality on student satisfaction of Gomal University DIKhan of Pakistan.

The study revealed that the service quality showed positive relationship towards

student satisfaction. The finding also showed that assurance and tangibility have

significant relationship towards student satisfaction and are considered the most

significant factors in improving the service quality in the said university.

In addition, the study of Khodayari and Khodayari (2011) aimed to

measure the service quality in Islamic Azad University in Iran in academic year

2010-2011. The results of the study revealed that there was a gap between the

students’ expectation and perception. Moreover, according to the result of the

study, reliability and assurance were the dimensions which are the most

important for the students.

The study of Kelso (2008) aimed to determine the level of satisfaction of

University of Florida undergraduate students with the services offered and the
11

environment of the institution. The results showed that most of the respondents

were 23-25 years old. And that there were more female than male respondents.

The study showed that among the areas of the institution that provide service,

Library services got an excellent result.

Moreover, the study of Ezeokoli and Ayodele (2014) aimed to determine

the service quality encounter of the students in Babcock University in the

academic year 2013-2014 and identify whether the service are satisfactory or

not. The result revealed that each dimension of service quality significantly

affects satisfaction of the students with the service provided by the university.

The result also showed that competent service quality was of utmost importance

in order to retain and gain students’ trust in choosing the best educational

institution.

In addition, the study of Min and Khoon (2013) aimed to determine the role

of demographic factors in the evaluation of the service quality in higher education

in the perspective of international students. It was revealed that among the

demographic variables, age showed significant relationship in the key elements

of service quality. On the other hand, gender, nationality and present level of the

study were considered the most influential variables in the satisfaction of the

students.

Further, the study of Owino (2013) aimed to investigate whether service

quality, corporate image and customer satisfaction are significantly related to one

another. The findings revealed that there is an existing significant relationship

between service quality, customer satisfaction and corporate image. Moreover,


12

the results indicate that good corporate image can enhance the relationship of

service quality and customer satisfaction.

Furthermore, the study of De Chavez, Maristela, and Panganiban (2014)

aimed to determine the perception of Batangas State University students on the

service quality of the frontline offices offered by the institution. Results show that

the respondents are very satisfied with the service quality of the frontline offices

such as accounting, cashier, registrar and library.

Synthesis

The literatures and studies that have been cited focused on measuring the

service quality perceived by the students in educational institution. The focus of

most of the evaluations were the five (5) dimensions of service quality namely

reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and responsiveness.

This study has similarities with the other studies cited in this section for

they all evaluated the service quality of educational institutions. In addition, this

study and the related studies are similar in the concept of a positive perception

about the service quality of the institution. However, the present study is different

from some of the cited studies for it focused only on the service quality of the

institution unlike the other studies which also focused on students’ satisfaction.

Additionally, the present study used different respondents and locale.


13

CHAPTER 3

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter discusses the research design, respondents of the study,

research locale, instrumentation, data-gathering procedure and statistical

treatment.

Research Design

This study utilized the descriptive method of research to evaluate the

service quality of Rogationist College school services. According to Briones

(2008), the descriptive method is used in describing the nature of a situation

which exists at the time of the study. It involves data collection to answer the

problem concerning the subject of the study. In particular, the researchers made

use of the evaluation type for this study.

Respondents of the Study

The subjects of the study were 200 selected college and technical

education students enrolled in Rogationist College in the school year 2016-2017.

The researchers used the stratified random sampling in order to get the

appropriate percentage of the respondents from the College and TED. Out of 548

college students, 176 were the selected respondents: 68 from the Business

Science Cluster, 21 from the Computer Studies Cluster, 34 from the Education
14

Cluster, 29 from the Engineering Cluster, 24 from the Tourism, Hotel and

Restaurant Cluster. Out of the 73 TED students, 24 were selected as

respondents. The students were chosen as respondents because they are the

direct recipient of Rogationist College school services.

Research Locale

This study was conducted in Rogationist College, a Catholic institution at

Lalaan ll, Silang, Cavite. It is one of the colleges in Cavite and is composed of

four (4) departments: junior high school, senior high school, college and technical

education departments. Since the researchers are students of this college, they

want to contribute to its continuous development.

Instrumentation

In order to evaluate the service quality in Rogationist College school

services in terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and

responsiveness, the researchers adapted the RATER Scale tool that was used

by Ulewicz (2014). The tool consists of three (3) parts:

The first part contains questions related to the demographic profile of the

respondents. The second part is comprised of 175 questions regarding the

dimensions of service quality offered in each office. This was adapted from the

following authors: Ulewicz (2014), Owino (2013), and Min and Khoon (2012). The

last part consists of comments and recommendations of the students. To

interpret the data, evaluations were measured through a five (5) point Likert scale
15

wherein one (1) = poor; two (2) = fair; three (3) = average; four (4) = above

average; five (5) = excellent. The interpretation presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Interpretation of Service Quality of Rogationist College School Services


Mean Value Description Verbal Interpretation

The aspects for the dimensions of service


4.20-5.00 Excellent
quality are fully met at a level of excellence
which serves as a model for others.

The aspects for the dimensions of service


3.40-4.19 Above Average
quality are met, with most elements
demonstrating a good practice

The aspects for the dimensions of service


2.60-3.39 Average quality are met in most respects, but
improvement is needed to overcome
weaknesses.

The aspects for the dimensions of service


1.80-2.59 Fair quality are met in some respects, but much
improvement is needed to overcome
weaknesses.

The aspects for the dimensions of service


1.00-1.79 Poor
quality are not met.

Procedure

After the approval of the study, the researchers proceeded to the

gathering of data. The instrument was administered to the selected students of

Rogationist College which are the college and TED students in the academic

school year 2016-2017. The researchers then collected the answered

questionnaires then sorted, analyzed, and interpreted the gathered data. The

summarized information was interpreted, cross-referenced, tabulated, and

presented. After the interpretation of the information gathered, the researchers


16

came up with conclusions and recommendation for the service quality of

Rogationist College school services.

Statistical Treatment of Data

The statistical method was applied for the analysis of the data and

interpretation of the results.

The researchers used frequency and percentage in determining the

demographic profile in evaluating the service quality in Rogationist College

school services given by the formula:

f
P= ×100
n
Where in:

f = frequency

n = total number of observation

P = percentages

In order to know the evaluation of service quality in Rogationist College

school services, the mean score was determined, given by the formula:

x=
∑ fx
n

Where in:

x = mean

f = frequency

x = score

n = total number of respondents


17

CHAPTER 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter discusses the results of the data gathering procedure. The

data were derived from the responses of the respondents. Tables are used to

present all the findings.

Demographic Profile of the Respondents

A total of 200 respondents comprise this study. The demographic profile

contains the age and gender of the respondents.

Age

Table 2 shows the frequency and percentage of the age of the

respondents.

Table 2. Age of the Respondents


Ages Frequency Percentage
18 and below 77 38.5
19-20 101 50.5
21 and above 22 11
TOTAL 200 100%

The table shows that about half of the respondents are 19-20 years old

and 38.5% are 18 years old or below. The smallest number of respondents is

composed of those who are 21 years or older. The result shows that most of the

respondents are in the period of adolescence wherein awareness and

expectations are formed and these students have more complex perceptions of

the services offered by the school. This is somehow similar to the study of Green

(2014) which revealed that most of the respondents are in the age bracket of 17-
18

21 years. However, it is contrary to the study of Kelso (2008) which showed that

the smallest group of respondents are 19-20 years old.

Gender

Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage of the gender of the

respondents.

Table 3. Gender of the Respondents


Gender Frequency Percentage
Male 95 47.5
Female 105 52.5
TOTAL 200 100%

The table shows that out of 200 respondents, 105 are female while 95 are

male. This means that more than half of the recipients of the services provided

by the school are female students. This is similar to the results of the studies of

Ulewicz (2014) and of Kelso (2008) which revealed that there are more female

respondents than male.

Service Quality of Rogationist College School Services

Table 4 shows the evaluation of students on the services provided by the

accounting and cashier office.


19
Table 4. Service Quality of Accounting and Cashier
A. ACCOUNTING AND CASHIER
1. Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.11 Above Average
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.24 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.11 Above Average
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.20 Excellent
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.12 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.15 Above Average
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.24 Excellent
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.37 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.34 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.35 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.27 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.31 Excellent
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.02 Above Average
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.36 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.45 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.29 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.28 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.28 Excellent
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.14 Above Average
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.18 Above Average
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.18 Above Average
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.17 Above Average
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 4.04 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.14 Above Average
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.22 Excellent
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.13 Above Average
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.13 Above Average
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise. 4.11 Above Average
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.02 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.12 Above Average
OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF ACCOUNTING AND
4.20 Excellent
CASHIER
20

The table shows that the service quality of accounting and cashier office in

terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated

4.15, 4.31, 4.28, 4.14 and 4.12 respectively. Generally, the service quality of

accounting and cashier office is 4.20 which is described as excellent. This means

that the aspects for the dimensions of service quality are fully met at a level of

excellence which serves as a model for others. This indicates that the office is

able to provide excellent service particularly in the dimensions of assurance and

tangibility. However, the office needs to improve the services on the reliability,

empathy and responsiveness dimensions, specifically in providing services at the

time promised, performing service right the first time and keeping students

informed of its updates. In the empathy dimension all the aspects need to be

improved. In the responsiveness dimension the aspects of readiness to respond

to students’ request, offering prompt service, the capacity to solve problems

when it arises and the availability of the personnel can also be improved. In

addition, as suggested by the respondents, the office needs to add windows for

the continuity of excellent and effective services. Also, the office needs to have

additional personnel to accommodate every student.

This affirms to the statement of Green (2014) that students perceived an

excellent service in the dimension of assurance. However, this result is contrary

to that of the study of Khan, Ahmed and Nawaz (2011) that tangibility is the

dimension which needs to be improved.

Table 5 shows the evaluation of students on the services provided by the


campus ministry.
21
Table 5. Service Quality of Campus Ministry
B. CAMPUS MINISTRY
1. Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.25 Excellent
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.25 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.26 Excellent
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.31 Excellent
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.28 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.27 Excellent
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.44 Excellent
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.36 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.40 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.43 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.41 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.41 Excellent
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.13 Above Average
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.31 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.36 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.33 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.33 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.29 Excellent
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.36 Excellent
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.42 Excellent
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.35 Excellent
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.41 Excellent
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 4.25 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.35 Excellent
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.43 Excellent
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.38 Excellent
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.31 Excellent
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise. 4.37 Excellent
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.35 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.37 Excellent
OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF CAMPUS MINISTRY 4.34 Excellent
22

The table shows that the service quality of campus ministry office in terms

of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated 4.27,

4.41, 4.29, 4.35 and 4.37, respectively. Generally, the service quality of campus

ministry office is 4.34 which is described as excellent. This indicates that the

aspects for the dimensions of service quality are fully met at a level of excellence

which serves as a model for others. This means that the campus ministry office

has provided an excellent service in all the dimensions of service quality.

However, in the dimension of tangibility the office needs to improve specifically in

having updated equipment since it was described as above average. In addition,

as suggested by the respondents, the office should update and inform the

students ahead of time about the different events and activities handled by the

said office.

This study is similar to the study of Ezeokoli and Ayodele (2014) which

showed that all the dimensions of service quality have a positive result in the

service quality encounter of the students and to the study of Chui et al. (2015)

which revealed that students perceived an excellent service in the dimensions of

reliability, tangibility and responsiveness.

Table 6 shows evaluation of students on the services provided by the

clinic.
23

Table 6. Service Quality of Clinic


C. CLINIC
1. Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.21 Excellent
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.39 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.19 Above Average
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.18 Above Average
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 3.99 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.19 Above Average
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.24 Excellent
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.29 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.25 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.38 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.22 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.27 Excellent
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.15 Above Average
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.28 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.46 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.34 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.32 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.31 Excellent
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.26 Excellent
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.24 Excellent
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.25 Excellent
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.23 Excellent
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 4.16 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.22 Excellent
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.40 Excellent
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.19 Above Average
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.18 Above Average
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they
4.23 Excellent
arise.
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.23 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.24 Excellent
24

OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF CLINIC 4.25 Excellent


The table shows that the service quality of clinic in terms of reliability,

assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated 4.19, 4.27, 4.31,

4.22 and 4.25 respectively. Generally, the service quality of clinic is 4.34 which is

described as excellent. This means that the aspects for the dimensions of service

quality are fully met at a level of excellence which serves as a model for others.

This indicates that the office is able to provide an excellent service particularly in

the dimensions of assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness. However,

the office needs to improve in the dimension of reliability specifically in

performing the service right the first time, showing sincere interest in solving

students’ problem and keeping informed of its updates. In the dimension of

tangibility, there is a need to improve the equipment of the office. Likewise, in

empathy, the office should improve in the way that it is not excessively strict

about rules and regulations. Moreover, there is a need to improve the personnel’s

readiness in responding to students’ request and the way the personnel offer

prompt services to students in the dimension of responsiveness. In addition, as

suggested by the respondents, the office should have availability of medical

equipment and medicines.

This is similar to the study of Kundi et al. (2014) which showed that

assurance and tangibility were the dimensions that was perceived excellent by

the students and to the study of Chopra, Chawla and Sharma (2014) which

revealed that reliability dimension have a lower rating than the other dimensions

of service quality.
25

Table 7 illustrates the evaluation of students on the services provided by


the guidance office.

Table 7. Service Quality of Guidance


D. GUIDANCE
1. Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.49 Excellent
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.51 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.48 Excellent
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.50 Excellent
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.50 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.49 Excellent
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.55 Excellent
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.54 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.52 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.56 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.49 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.53 Excellent
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.20 Excellent
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.44 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.51 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.36 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.37 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.37 Excellent
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.44 Excellent
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.47 Excellent
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.52 Excellent
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.51 Excellent
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 4.42 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.47 Excellent
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.54 Excellent
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.50 Excellent
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.47 Excellent
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise. 4.52 Excellent
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.48 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.50 Excellent
26

OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF GUIDANCE 4.47 Excellent

The table shows that the service quality of guidance in terms of reliability,

assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated 4.49, 4.53, 4.37,

4.47 and 4.50 respectively. Generally, the service quality of guidance is 4.47

which is described as excellent that is interpreted as the aspects for the

dimensions of service quality are fully met at a level of excellence which serves

as a model for others. This indicates that guidance office has provided excellent

services in all the dimensions of service quality and it shows that students have

no problem regarding the services offered by the said office. In addition, the

respondents commented the office as very good to give emphasis to the service

it has provided.

This is similar to the study of Ulewicz (2014) which revealed that students

perceived an excellent service in the dimensions of reliability and

responsiveness. Moreover, it is similar to the study of Seng and Ling (2013)

which showed that the services offered by the institution have a positive result

and to the study of Ezeokoli and Ayodele (2014) which showed that all the

dimensions of service quality have a positive result in the service quality

encounter of the students.

Table 8 shows the evaluation of students on the services provided by the


library.
27

Table 8. Service Quality of Library


E. LIBRARY
1. Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.13 Above Average
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.16 Above Average
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.09 Above Average
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 3.97 Above Average
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.04 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.08 Above Average
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 3.86 Above Average
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.10 Above Average
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.04 Above Average
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.05 Above Average
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.10 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.03 Above Average
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.10 Above Average
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.18 Above Average
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.33 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.23 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.25 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.22 Excellent
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.11 Above Average
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.04 Above Average
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.03 Above Average
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.06 Above Average
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 3.99 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.04 Above Average
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.10 Above Average
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.00 Above Average
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.03 Above Average
28

5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise. 4.07 Above Average
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.07 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.05 Above Average
OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF LIBRARY 4.08 Above Average

The table shows that the service quality of library in terms of reliability,

assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated 4.08, 4.03, 4.22,

4.04 and 4.05 respectively. Generally, the service quality of library is 4.08 which

is described as above average. This means that the aspects for the dimensions

of service quality are met, with most elements demonstrating a good practice.

This indicates that the office is able to provide an excellent service in the

dimension of tangibility. However, the office needs to improve the services on the

dimensions of reliability, assurance, empathy and responsiveness specifically in

all the aspects of the dimensions. In addition, as suggested by the respondents,

there is a lack in terms of availability of personnel in the said office. This is similar

to the study of Chui et al. (2015) which revealed that students perceived an

excellent service in the dimension of tangibility. However, it is contrary to the

study of Kelso (2008) which showed that among the areas of institution that

provide service, library has the highest satisfaction level rating.

Table 9 shows the evaluation of students on the services provided by the

office of the student discipline.


29

Table 9. Service Quality of Office of the Student Discipline


F. OFFICE OF THE STUDENT DISCIPLINE
1.Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.20 Excellent
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.27 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.22 Excellent
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.21 Excellent
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.19 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.22 Excellent
2.Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.12 Above Average
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.30 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.21 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.29 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.16 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.21 Excellent
3.Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.02 Above Average
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.20 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.00 Above Average
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 3.97 Above Average
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.04 Above Average
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.04 Above Average
4.Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 3.81 Above Average
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 3.99 Above Average
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 3.91 Above Average
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 3.90 Above Average
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 3.92 Above Average
Average Mean Score 3.90 Above Average
5.Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.17 Above Average
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.11 Above Average
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.10 Above Average
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they
4.19 Above Average
arise.
30

5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.11 Above Average
Average Mean Score 4.13 Above Average
OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF THE OFFICE OF THE
4.10 Above Average
STUDENT DISCIPLINE

The table shows that the service quality of student discipline office in

terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated

4.22, 4.21, 4.04, 3.90 and 4.10 respectively. Generally, the service quality of

office of the student discipline is 4.10 which is described as above average. This

means that the aspects for the dimensions of service quality are met, with most

elements demonstrating a good practice. This indicates that the office is able to

provide an excellent service on the dimensions of reliability and assurance.

However, the office needs to improve the services on the dimensions of

tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness respectively. Specifically, improvements

are needed in having updated equipment, cleanliness, appealing environment

and excessively strict about rules and regulations of the office. Likewise,

empathy and responsiveness dimension need improvement in all aspects. In

addition, as suggested by the respondents, there should be a fair and unbiased

treatment of all students.

This is similar to the study of Ulewicz (2014) which showed that student

perceived an excellent service in the dimension of reliability. Moreover, this is

similar to the study of Khodayari and Khodayari (2011) which also revealed that

reliability and assurance were the dimensions which are the most important

dimension for the students.

Table 10 shows the evaluation of students on the services provided by the


registrar.
31

Table 10. Service Quality of Registrar’s Office


G. REGISTRAR
1.Reliability MEAN DESCRIPTION
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised. 4.34 Excellent
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately. 4.36 Excellent
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time. 4.28 Excellent
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems. 4.29 Excellent
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates. 4.31 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.31 Excellent
2.Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous. 4.38 Excellent
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
4.39 Excellent
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions. 4.37 Excellent
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service. 4.42 Excellent
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student. 4.34 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.38 Excellent
3.Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment. 4.35 Excellent
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
4.45 Excellent
positions.
3.3 The office is clean. 4.45 Excellent
3.4 The office has an appealing environment. 4.41 Excellent
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
4.50 Excellent
accessible.
Average Mean Score 4.43 Excellent
4.Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students. 4.42 Excellent
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern. 4.41 Excellent
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart. 4.39 Excellent
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs. 4.35 Excellent
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations. 4.24 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.36 Excellent
5.Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students. 4.48 Excellent
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request. 4.37 Excellent
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students. 4.37 Excellent
32

5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise. 4.39 Excellent
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you. 4.40 Excellent
Average Mean Score 4.40 Excellent
OVERALL SERVICE QUALITY RATING OF REGISTRAR’S OFFICE 4.38 Excellent

The table shows that the service quality of registrar’s office in terms of

reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness are rated 4.31,

4.38, 4.43, 4.36 and 4.40 respectively. Generally, the service quality of the

registrar’s office is 4.38 which is described as excellent. This means that the

aspects for the dimensions of service quality are fully met at a level of excellence

which serves as a model for others. This indicates that registrar’s office has

provided excellent services in all the dimensions of service quality and students

have no problem regarding the service offered by the said office. However, as

suggested by the respondents, the office needs to have additional windows and

personnel.

This is similar to the study of Ezeokoli and Ayodele (2014) which shows

that all the dimensions of service quality have a positive result in the service

quality encounter of the students. Moreover, it is similar to the study of Seng and

Ling (2013) which revealed that the services offered by the institution have a

positive result and to the study conducted by Chui et al. (2015) which revealed

that students perceived an excellent service in the dimension of reliability,

tangibility and responsiveness.

Table 11 shows the overall rating on service quality of Rogationist College

school services
33

Table 11. Overall Ratings of the Service Quality of the Offices in Rogationist College
Offices Dimension Total Description
Reliability Assurance Tangibility Empathy Responsiveness
Accounting and
4.15 4.31 4.28 4.14 4.12 4.20 Excellent
Cashier
Campus Ministry 4.27 4.41 4.29 4.35 4.37 4.34 Excellent
Clinic 4.19 4.27 4.31 4.22 4.24 4.25 Excellent
Guidance 4.49 4.53 4.37 4.47 4.50 4.47 Excellent
Above
Library 4.08 4.03 4.22 4.04 4.05 4.09
Average
Student Above
4.22 4.21 4.04 3.90 4.13 4.10
Discipline Average
Registrar's Office 4.31 4.38 4.43 4.36 4.40 4.38 Excellent
Overall 4.26 Excellent

The table shows that the overall service quality of the offices is 4.26 which

is described as excellent. This means that the aspects for the dimensions of

service quality are fully met at a level of excellence which serves as a model for

others. The result indicates that most of the offices are performing very well in

terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and responsiveness. Also, the

offices that were described as excellent have provided the services expected by

the students. The results revealed that the office that need to improve the

services are library and office of the student discipline since they are described

as above average, unlike the others that are described as excellent.

This is similar to the study of De Chavez, Maristela, and Panganiban

(2014) which revealed that the service quality of the offices in Batangas State

University was perceived positively by the students. It is also similar to the study
34

of Seng and Ling (2013) which revealed that respondents have a positive

perception of the services offered by the institution.

CHAPTER 5
SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter summarizes the findings and presents the generated

conclusions and recommendations according to the analysis of the result of the

study.

Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the service quality of accounting and

cashier’s office, campus ministry, clinic, guidance office, library, office of the

student discipline and registrar’s office in Rogationist College in terms of

reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy, and responsiveness. This includes the

demographic profile of the respondents in terms of age and gender.

In this study, the researchers utilized the descriptive method of research.

In order to evaluate the service quality of Rogationist College school services,

the researchers adapted the RATER Scale from the study of Ulewicz (2014). This

instrument consists of five (5) dimensions namely reliability, assurance,

tangibility, empathy and responsiveness. The subjects of the study were 200

selected college and technical education students enrolled in Rogationist College

in the school year 2016-2017.


35

The study revealed that majority of the respondents belong to the age

bracket of 19-20 years and most of them are female. The result revealed that the

accounting and cashier’s office was described as excellent since it provides

excellent service in the dimensions of assurance and tangibility. However, the

office needs to improve in the dimensions of reliability, empathy and

responsiveness as it was described as above average. The campus ministry

office was described as excellent since that it provides excellent service in all the

dimensions of service quality. The clinic was described as excellent since it

provides excellent service in the dimensions of assurance, tangibility, empathy

and responsiveness. However, the office needs to improve in the dimension of

reliability as it was described as above average. The guidance office was

described as excellent since that it provides excellent service in all the

dimensions of service quality. The library was described as above average even

as it provides excellent service in the dimension of tangibility, and the office

needs to improve in the dimensions of reliability, assurance, empathy and

responsiveness as it was described as above average. The office of the student

discipline was described as above average even as it provides excellent service

in the dimensions of reliability and assurance. The office needs to improve in the

dimensions of tangibility, empathy and responsiveness. The registrar’s office was

described as excellent since that it provides excellent service in all the

dimensions of service quality. The result shows that most of the offices are

performing very well in terms of reliability, assurance, tangibility, empathy and

responsiveness.
36

Conclusions

From the findings of the study conclusions were drawn. These conclusions

answered the statement of the problem that helps Rogationist College identify

the level of service quality offered by the school to the students.

Based on the results, most of the respondents are in the period of

adolescence wherein awareness and expectations are formed and these

students have more complex perceptions of the services offered by the school.

Moreover, most of the recipients of the service provided by the school are female

students.

The accounting and cashier’s office provides excellent service in the

dimensions of assurance and tangibility. However, the office needs to improve

the services on the reliability, empathy and responsiveness dimensions,

specifically in providing services at the time promised, performing service right

the first time and keeping students informed of its updates. In the empathy all the

aspects need to be improved. In the responsiveness the aspects of readiness to

respond to students’ request, offering prompt service, the capacity to solve

problems when it arises and the availability of the personnel can also be

improved. In addition, as suggested by the respondents, the office needs to add

windows for the continuity of excellent and effective services. Also, the office

needs to have additional personnel to accommodate every student.

The campus ministry office provides excellent service in all the dimensions

of service quality. However, the office needs to improve in the tangibility


37

specifically in having updated equipment. In addition, as suggested by the

respondents, the office should update and inform the students ahead of time

about the different events and activities handled by the said office.

The clinic provides excellent service in the dimensions of assurance,

tangibility, empathy and responsiveness. However, the office needs to improve in

reliability specifically in performing the service right the first time, showing sincere

interest in solving students’ problem and keeping informed of its updates. In

tangibility, there is a need to upgrade the equipment. Likewise, there is a need to

improve the personnel’s readiness in responding students’ request and the way

the personnel offer prompt services to students in the dimension of

responsiveness. In addition, as suggested by the respondents, the office should

have availability of medical equipment and medicines.

The guidance office provides excellent service in all the dimensions of

service quality. In addition, the respondents commented the office as very good

to give emphasis to the service it has provided.

The library provides excellent service in the dimension of tangibility.

However, there is a need to improve in all the aspects of the dimensions of

reliability, assurance, empathy and responsiveness. In addition, as suggested by

the respondents, there is a lack in terms of availability of personnel.

The office of the student discipline provides excellent service quality in the

dimension of reliability and assurance. However, there is still a need to improve

in those dimensions specifically in keeping students informed of its updates and

in the personnel’s friendliness and courteousness and instilling trust and


38

confidence on the students. Moreover, in tangibility, the equipment, cleanliness,

appealing environment and excessively strict about rules and regulations can

also be improved. Likewise, empathy and responsiveness need to improve in all

aspects. In addition, as suggested by the respondents, there should be a fair and

unbiased treatment of all students.

The registrar’s office provides excellent service in all the dimensions of

service quality. However, as suggested by the respondents, the office needs to

have additional windows and personnel.

Recommendations

Based on the conclusions drawn, the following recommendations are

made: School administrators should consider the demographic profile of

the students. This means that the services should address the concerns of

adolescents and females since most of the students belong to these groups.

In the accounting and cashier, the office should improve on providing

services at the time promised, performing service right the first time, and keeping

students informed of its updates. This can be done through posting on bulletin

boards that will serve as the student and personnel’s reminder in the current and

future activities and events. Also, it is suggested that the said office should

always respond in a timely manner with a more manageable timeframe that is

very clear to the students and personnel as well. In addition, upgrading the

equipment in this office will help in providing an excellent service. Furthermore,

there should be an improvement in the empathy dimension by enhancing the


39

treatment and interaction of the personnel with the students. This can be

achieved through seminars for the personnel that promote a more friendly and

caring service. It is also recommended that being strict about the rules and

procedures should be maintained for the reason that they are imposed by the

office for the services to be organized and orderly and for the students to follow.

However, there are situations when the service provider should understand the

students and being excessively strict should be lessened. Additionally, in the

dimension of responsiveness, it is recommended to fix the break time schedule

of the personnel to enhance the availability of personnel in this office.

Furthermore, encouraging the personnel to attend seminars or training that

promotes flexibility will help the personnel to have the readiness to respond and

the capacity to solve problems in providing services to the students.

In the campus ministry office further improvement can still be applied in

terms of its equipment. It can be done by having an upgrade regarding the

equipment in this office for it will help in providing an excellent services.

In clinic, the office should improve its services on keeping students

informed of its updates through posting on bulletin boards as reminders of

current and future activities and events. Also, performing service right the first

time and showing sincere interest in solving students’ problem can further be

improved by preparing the personnel through training, workshops, and seminars

which promote flexibility and sincerity in solving students’ problems. In addition,

further improvement can still be applied in tangibility by upgrading the equipment

in this office. Furthermore, in empathy, it is recommended that being strict about


40

the rules and procedures should be maintained for the reason that they are

imposed by the office for the services to be organized and orderly and for the

students to follow. However, there are situations when the service provider

should understand the students and being excessively strict should be lessened.

In the guidance office, the researchers recommend to continue and

maintain the services in all the dimensions of service quality since they provide

excellent service to all students.

In the library, the researchers recommend that the office should improve

on providing services at the time promised and keeping students informed of its

updates by posting reminders of the current and future activities and events on

bulletin boards. Also, an improvement in keeping its records accurately is

needed, it can be done through properly organizing the documents to avoid loss

of records. Also, performing service right the first time can further be improved by

preparing the personnel through training that promotes flexibility which is an

essential element to perform an excellent service. In addition, the researchers

recommend that the personnel which are not focused on showing sincere interest

in solving problem should be mentored and coached through training program

that promote problem solving in terms of providing service. Moreover, in the

assurance dimension, the researchers recommend that the head of this office

should advise the personnel to practice friendliness and courteousness in every

personnel’s encounter with the students. Also, personnel should be encouraged

to participate in the seminars, workshops, and trainings that promotes knowledge

about rules and procedures, knowledge to answer students’ questions, having


41

the required skills, and instilling trust and confidence will help to the improvement

of the office to be able to provide excellent service. The researchers also

recommend improvement in the Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC) System

by expanding its coverage and contents of the textbook for the awareness of

every individual. Also, the office should have mandatory update and checking of

the equipment regularly including the systems, computers, wireless fidelity (Wi-

Fi) access and air conditioner. Regarding the empathy dimension, the

researchers recommend that the personnel in this office should be encouraged to

participate in seminars, workshops, and training activities that promotes fair and

unbiased treatment of students, giving attention to students with concern and

providing service with the students’ best interest at heart. It is also recommended

that being strict about the rules and procedures should be maintained for the

reason that they are imposed by the office for the services to be organized and

orderly and for the students to follow. However, there are situations when the

service provider should understand the students and being excessively strict

should be lessened. Additionally, in the dimension of responsiveness, it is

recommended to fix the break time schedule of the personnel to enhance the

availability of personnel in this office. Furthermore, encouraging the personnel to

attend seminars or training that promotes flexibility will help the personnel to

have the readiness to respond and the capacity to solve problems in providing

services to the students.

In the office of the student discipline, improvement in the reliability

dimension is suggested in terms of keeping the students informed of its updates


42

by posting them on the bulletin board of the office. Moreover, in the dimension of

assurance, the researchers recommend that the personnel of this office be

encouraged to attend seminars and trainings that promote friendliness and

courteousness and ability to instill trust and confidence. In the tangibility

dimension of this office, it is recommended to improve the cleanliness by having

regular checking and inspection of the office facility. Moreover, the physical

evidence of the office can be improved by making it more appealing through

renovation and rearranging the design of the office to have a good ambiance and

an appealing environment. Also, regular checking of the materials used in

providing services is needed to have understandable and accessible materials. In

the dimension of empathy, it is recommended that the head of this office should

have a regular evaluation about the performance of the personnel and to have

training that promotes fair and unbiased treatment of students, giving attention to

students with concern, providing service with the students’ best interest at heart

understanding students’ needs. It is also recommended that being strict about the

rules and procedures should be maintained for the reason that they are imposed

by the office for the services to be organized and orderly and for the students to

follow. However, there are situations when the service provider should

understand the students and being excessively strict should be lessened.

Additionally, in the dimension of responsiveness, it is recommended to fix the

break time schedule of the personnel to enhance the availability of personnel in

this office.
43

In the registrar’s office, the researchers recommend to continue and

maintain the services in all the dimensions of service quality since they provide

excellent service to all students.

REFERENCES
Armstrong, G. E., and Kotler, P. (2011). Marketing: An Introduction (10th Edition).
Pearson Education, Inc. (pp.254). Philippines.

Chopra, R., Chawla, M. and Sharma, T. (2014). Service quality in higher


education: A comparative study of management and education institutions.
NMIMS Management Review, Volume 14, 80-92. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.nmims.edu//pdf/april-may-14/service-quality-higher-
education-comparative-study-management-and-education-institutions-rita-
mamta-and-tejinder.pdf

Chui, T., Ahmad, M., Bassim, F. and Zaimi, B. (2015). Evaluation of service
quality of private higher education using service improvement matrix.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 132-140. doi:
10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.417

Commission on Higher Education. (2014). Handbook on Typology, Based


Education, and Institutional Sustainability Assessment. Retrieved from
www.ched.com.ph.

De Chavez, K., Maristela, M. and Panganiban, R. (2014). Perception of the


college student on the service quality of the front line services in Batangas
State University - ARASOF (Theses and Dissertations). 21-38.

Ezeokoli, R. N. and Ayodele, K. O. (2014). Dimensions of service quality


encountered by students on sustainability of higher education in Nigeria.
Developing country studies, Vol.4, No.6, 147-153. Retrieved
fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publica-tion/263433364_Dimensions_of
_Service_Quality_Encountered_By_Students_onSustainability_of_Higher
_Education_in_Nigeria.
44

Famacion-Quinco, D. (2010). Students' satisfaction towards the service


quality
Of La Salle University. Retrieved from.ph/institutional_research_ office/pub
lications/vol.15no.5/2.html&ved=0ahUKEwjdg7ef4bLTAhXJkJQKHQLKAF
AQFggYMAA&usg=AFQjCNGkq_SR4Uw2yaZ_ea17RCGUKFyw6Q

Green, P. (2014). Measuring service quality in higher education: A South African.


Journal of International Education Research; Littleton, Vol. 10, No. 2, 23-
40. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/openview/ec7e211a94e8d
b84c7fa93f8e3da383/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2026732.

Hernon, P. and Calvert, P. (2006). Improving the Quality of library service for
students with disabilities, p. 104-105. Retrieved from
https://muse.jhu.edu/article/200213.

Kelso, R. (2008). Measuring undergraduate student perceptions of service


quality in higher education graduate (Theses and Dissertations). Retrieved
from http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1327&context=etd.

Khan, I., Ahmed, I. and Nawaz, M. M. (June 2011). Student’s perspective of


service quality in higher learning institutions. An Evidence Based
Approach International Journal of Business and Social Science, Vol. 2,
No. 11, 87-124.

Khodayari, F. and Khodayari, B. (2011). Service quality in higher education:


measuring service quality of Islamic Azad University, Firoozkooh branch.
Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, Vol. 1, Issue. 9, 56-72.

Kundi, G., Qureshi, A., Khan, Y. and Akhtar, R. (2014). Impact of service quality
on customer satisfaction in higher education institutions. Industrial
Engineering Letters, Vol.4, No.3, 23-37.

Lovelock, C., and Wirtz, J. (2011). Services Marketing: People, Technology and
Strategy (7th Edition.). Pearson Education, Inc. (pp.405). Philippines.

Min, S. (2013). Demographic factors in the evaluation of service quality in higher


education: international students’ perspective. International Review of
Management and Business Research, Vol. 2, Issue.4, 994-1005.

Munhurrun, P., Naidoo, P., and Nundlall, P. (2009). A proposed model for
measuring service quality in secondary education. International Journal
of Quality and Service Sciences, Vol. 2 Issue: 3, pp.335-351, doi:
10.1108/17566691011090062

Owino, E. (2013). The influence of service quality and corporate image on


45

customer satisfaction among university students in Kenya (Theses and


Dissertations). Retrieved from http://chss.uonbi.ac.ke/sites/ default/files/ch
ss/Edward%20Owino%20PhD%20Thesis.pdf.

Sasikala, D. (2013). Impact of demographics on service quality, customer


satisfaction and loyalty in the Indian banking in Vellore district. Asia Pacific
Journal of Marketing and Management Review, Vol.2, No. 6, 109-112.

Seng, E. and Ling, T. (2013). A statistical analysis of education service quality


dimensions on business school students’ satisfaction. International
Education Studies, Vol. 6, No. 8, 106-120. doi:10.5539/Ies.V6n8p136.

Ulewicz, R. (2014). Application of SERVQUAL method for evaluation of quality of


educational services at the University of higher education. Polish Journal
of Management Studies, Vol.9, 254-263.
46

APPENDICES

APPENDIX A

LETTER OF REQUEST FOR THE RECTOR

Date: December 1, 2016

For: SGD. FR. CARLOS R. GUZMAN, RCJ


Rector

From: SGD. ABBYSHANE MELRISH D. ALLA

SGD. ELAINE B. DIMAALA

SGD. RIAN JAY P. DIMAANO

SGD. NIÑA SARAH C. VIDAMO


Researchers, Business Science Cluster

Re: Permission to conduct the study in Rogationist College

Greetings!

We, the 4th year Bachelor of Science in Business Administration students of Rogationist College
will conduct a research entitled “An Evaluation on the Service Quality of Rogationist College
School Services”. The aim of the study is to evaluate the service quality of Rogationist College
offices which will include the accounting and cashier, campus ministry, clinic, guidance, library,
registrar and prefect office. This study may serve as basis for the improvement of school services
and it can also strengthen the service on which each offices are proficient and may serve as the
school administration tool for planning and proposing what actions are needed to be done for the
improvement of each offices.

In line with this, we are asking permission to make Rogationist College as the locale of our
research. We will also be using the name of the Rogationist College in various parts of our
research where our primary data will be gathered.

We are looking forward that our request will merit a positive response. Thank you and God bless
you.

Noted by: Endorsed by:

SGD. MARK LAYNARD E. VILLANUEVA, CPA SGD. ANNALIZA C. SINFUEGO, MS


Thesis Adviser College Dean
47

APPENDIX B

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE
Dear respondents,
We, 4th year Bachelor of Science in Business Administration major in Marketing
Management students in Rogationist College, Lalaan II, Silang, Cavite are currently conducting a
marketing research that aims to evaluate the service quality of the Rogationist College school
services from selected offices. In line with this, we are requesting you to answer the survey
questionnaire. Rest assured that your answers will be kept confidential and will be used only for
the purpose of the study. Thank you for your kind cooperation!

The Researchers

Name (Optional):
Year/Course:

PART 1: Demographic Profile


Direction: Kindly indicate your age on the space provided and put a check mark ( √ ) on the box
for your gender.

1.1 Age: _________


1.2 Gender: Female Male

PART 2: Service quality of Rogationist College school service


Direction: Kindly rate the quality of service of the indicated offices of Rogationist College by
putting a check mark ( √ ) in the box provided for each number.
Legend: 5 – Excellent 2 – Fair
4 – Above Average 1 – Poor
3 – Average

A. ACCOUNTING AND CASHIER OFFICE


1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
48

4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
B. CAMPUS MINISTRY
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
C. CLINIC
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
49

1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          


1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
D. GUIDANCE OFFICE
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
50

4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
E. LIBRARY
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
F. OFFICE OF THE STUDENT DISCIPLINE
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
51

1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          


2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.        
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          
4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          
G. REGISTRAR’S OFFICE
1. Reliability 5 4 3 2 1
1.1 The personnel provide services at the time promised.          
1.2 The office keeps its records accurately.          
1.3 The office performs the service right the first time.          
1.4 The personnel show sincere interest in solving students’ problems.          
1.5 The office keeps students informed of its updates.          
2. Assurance
2.1 The personnel are friendly and courteous.          
2.2 The personnel have knowledge of the rules and procedures of the
         
office.
2.3 The personnel have the knowledge to answer students' questions.          
2.4 The personnel have the required skills to perform the service.          
2.5 The personnel instill trust and confidence in the student.          
3. Tangibility
3.1 The office has updated equipment.          
3.2 The personnel present themselves in a manner appropriate to their
         
positions.
3.3 The office is clean.          
3.4 The office has an appealing environment.          
3.5 The materials related to provide services are understandable and
         
accessible.
4. Empathy
4.1 The personnel are fair and unbiased in their treatment of students.          
52

4.2 The personnel give attention to all students with concern.          


4.3 The personnel have the students’ best interests at heart.          
4.4 The personnel understand the students' needs.          
4.5 The office is not excessively strict about rules and regulations.          
5. Responsiveness
5.1 The personnel are always willing to help students.          
5.2 The personnel are ready to respond to students’ request.          
5.3 The personnel offer prompt services to students.          
5.4 The personnel have the capacity to solve problems when they arise.          
5.5 The office has available personnel to assist you.          

PART 3: COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


Direction: Please provide us with details of what you think could
comment or recommend about the service quality of Rogationist College school services.

Thank you

APPENDIX C
53

RESEARCHERS’ PROFILE

RIAN JAY P. DIMAANO


Tubuan II, Silang, Cavite
09195001339
riandimaano@yahoo.com

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
POST GRADUATE STUDIES Philippine Christian University
Sampaloc I, Dasmariñas, Cavite
Master’s in Business Administration
September 2020 – present

TERTIARY EDUCATION Rogationist College


Km 52, Aguinaldo Highway, Lalaan II, Silang,
Cavite
Bachelor of Science in Business Administration
Major in Marketing Management
2013 – 2017

SECONDARY EDUCATION Munting Ilog National High School


Munting Ilog, Silang, Cavite
2012
WORK EXPERIENCE

COLLEGE INSTRUCTOR I Cavite State University – Main


Indang, Cavite
September 2020 – Present

SENIOR HIGHSCHOOL TEACHER Our Lady of Fatima – Laguna


Sta. Rosa, Laguna
January 2022 – Present

SENIOR HIGHSCHOOL TEACHER Far Eastern University


Metrogate, Silang, Cavite
June 2018 – September 2020

SENIOR HIGHSCHOOL TEACHER Rogationist College


Lalaan II, Silang, Cavite
June 2017 – May 2018

INTERNSHIP Nissan Dasmarinas


Dasmarinas, Cavite
54

Admin’s Assistant
April – May 2016
ABILITY AND SKILLS
 Strong Communication Skills
 Computer Literate (Microsoft Office, Photoshop, Dreamweaver)
 Knowledgeable in creating Marketing and Business Plan
 Ability to do multi-tasking
 Leadership Skills

SEMINAR ATTENDED
MADWORLD: Upsetting the Status Quo
SM Mall of Asia Arena, Pasay City
February 26, 2017

Good Manufacturing Practices


Rogationist College, Silang Cavite
January 25, 2017
Go Green: Inspiring the Youth in Greening the Enterprise
Provincial Gymnasium, Trece, Martires, Cavite
September 29, 2016

Explore, Engage, Evolve because Opportunities are Boundless


FilOil Flying V Arena, San Juan City
January 29, 2016

Equipping RC Students: Ready for Action


Rogationist College, Silang Cavite
January 20, 2016

AFFILIATION
Marketing Enthusiast in Rogationist College Excellence (MERCX)
Rogationist College, Silang, Cavite
Member
2013 – 2017

REFERENCES
Maria May Cruz, MBA
Program Chair, Rogationist College
09778062480

Raymart Manalo, RMP


Faculty Member, Rogationist College
09096931012
55

Marizel C. Benter MBA


Former MERCX Adviser
09206707844

PERSONAL DATA
AGE: 26 years WEIGHT: 58 kg
old CIVIL STATUS: Single
BIRTHDATE: Nov. 6, CITIZENSHIP: Filipino
1996 RELIGION: Roman Catholic
HEIGHT: 5’3
“I hereby certify that the information is true and correct to the
best of
my knowledge and ability.”

RIAN JAY P. DIMAANO

You might also like