C3-LFC-E-MST-022 R01 TC of LV Switchgears.

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 35

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

APPENDIX –A
CHECK LIST

 
 

   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

Pre-Commissioning Checklist of LV SWITCHGEARS

Name of the
Project: EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY
Name of the Emirates Real Estate Corporation
Client:
Name of the
Project
Hill International
Manager
Name of the EHAF Consulting Engineer
Consultant:
Name of Airolink Building Contracting LLC
Contractor
 
Inspection Request Ref No.   Date  

Location:   Time  
Area / Location:  
   

    Satisfactory  
SI No Description Remarks
Yes No

   
1 Approved layout drawings and general assembly drawings to be in place.  
Verify approved installation Inspection Request for panels, panel components and
2
incomer/outgoing cables.
     
Approved panel and cable cold inspection request prior to live test of panel and outgoing
3
cables.
     
4 Check safe access to work areas and approved by Authorized Safety Officer.  
5 Calibrated test instrument and calibration certificate to be in place.  
6 Check safe access to work areas and approved by Authorized Safety Officer.  
Compare nameplates of equipment and detailed components with single line diagram and
7
specified requirements, and report discrepancies.
     
Check for proper anchorage, required clearances, physical damage, and proper
8
alignment of switchgear and components.
     
  Inspect all doors, panels, and sections for paint, dents, scratches, fit, and missing
9      
hardware.
  Verify that fuse and circuit breaker sizes, types, and ratings are according to the
10      
approved drawings
 
  Test electrical and mechanical interlock systems for proper operation and sequencing.      
11 Make closure attempts on locked open devices. Make opening attempts on locked closed
devices. Attempt key exchanges with devices in exchange preventing positions.
  Inspect insulators for evidence of physical damage and contaminated surfaces. Verify
12      
proper barrier and shutter installation and operation.
13 Mechanical locking of switchgear devices.  
14 Markings on the switchboards, on power and control conductors.  
15 Visual inspection of outside surfaces and paintworks.  
16 Protective Device and Relay Settings.  
17 Touch up any scratches or other defects  
Consultant's Comments:

       
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

 
Name
         

 
Signature & Date
         

 
 

   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

Emergency Power Off (EPO) - Test Report


Name of the
Project: EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY
Name of the
Client:
Emirates Real Estate
Name of the
Project
Hill International
Manager
Name of the EHAF Consulting Engineer
Consultant:
Name of Airolink Building Construction LLC
Contractor
 
Inspection Request Ref No.   Date  
Location:   Time  
Area / Location:  
   
 
     
Emergency Push Button
SL No  PANEL REFERENCE  Remarks 
(OK / NOT OK) 
1       

2       

3       

4       

5       

6       

7       

8       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

 
Name
         

 
Signature & Date
         

 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
CB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
Name of the Project:  EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY

 
Name of the Client:  Emirates Real Estate

 
  Hill International
Name of the Project Manager 

 
  EHAF Consulting Engineer
Name of the Consultant: 

 
  Airolink Building Contracting LLC 
Name of Contractor 

Inspection Request Ref No.    Date 

Location:    Time 

Area / Location:   

 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
1  Visual Inspection of Assembly     
1.1  Overall Assembly Dimensions.   
1.2  General Arrangement layout as per the drawing.  
1.3  Verify whether enclosure is free from any external damages.  
1.4  Verify Electrical Clearance.   
1.5  Verify whether the panel is clean and free from foreign matter.  
1.6  Verify whether the alignment and tightness of the cubicles are proper.  
1.7  Verify whether the cables are properly glanded and terminated, if any.  
     
Verify shrouding provided for all live parts to prevent accidental 
1.8   
contact. 
1.9  Verify all warning labels are in right place.  
1.10  Settings of all Incoming breakers.  
2  Mechanical Tests     
     
Verify the tightness of bolts used in MCCB Incoming and outgoing 
2.1   
links. 
2.2  Verify the tightness of power and control wires.  
 
Verify whether the busbar links are properly bolted and are having red     
2.3   
marks for correct torque tightness. 
3  Electrical bonding between Mechanical Parts & Structure     
3.1  All Metal Parts & Main Earth Bar.  
3.2  Doors and Main Earth Bar.   
3.3  Metallic Body of the Components Installed (if applicable).  

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB  1 of 4
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
CB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
4  FUNCTIONAL TEST     
  Indication Lamps checked.     
  Manual operation checked.     
  MCCB rating checked.     
  Electrical Functional of all switching device tested.     
  AUTO Operation checked     
  Ventilation fan operation     
  Door limit switch operation     
 
PROTECTIVE DEVICE CHECK 
 
  MAKE  RATED VOLTAGE  RATED CURRENT  TYPE 
CONTACTOR /FUSES         
REACTOR         
CAPACITOR         
 
PARAMETER SETTING CHECK 
 
 
SR NO  DESCRIPTION SETTINGS REMARKS
1  CT Ratio     
2  Control series.     
3  Control Mode.     
4  Measuring Voltage.     
5  Measuring frequency.     
6  Target PF.     
7  Connecting time     
8  Disconnecting time     
9  Discharge time     
10  Harmonics     
       

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB  2 of 4
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
CB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR TESTING 
 
 
INST.  TEST  CAL.DUE 
DESCRIPTION  MAKE  MODEL  SL.NO 
REFERENCE  DATE 
             

             

             

             

             
 
 
 
 
 
INSULATION RESISTANCE TEST DETAILS 
 
   
  Insulation  IR Value in 
  Sl. 
  Resistance  Mega Ohms 
No 
  1000VDC 
  1  R ‐ Y  Ω
 
  2  Y ‐ B  Ω
  3  B ‐ R  Ω
 
4  R ‐ N  Ω
5  Y ‐ N  Ω Reference Values: 
6  B ‐ N  Ω For Insulation resistance test: ≥1MΩ 
7  R ‐ E  Ω
8  Y ‐ E  Ω
9  B ‐ E  Ω
10  N ‐ E  Ω

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB  3 of 4
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
CB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
ANNEXURE 
(Comment / Observation) 
 
   
Sl. 
Comment / Observation  Responsibility  Complied Date 
No 
1       

2       

3       

4       

5       

6       

7       

8       

9       

10       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
       
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

Name             

Signature             

Date             

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB  4 of 4
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 
Name of the Project:  EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY

 
Name of the Client:  Emirates Real Estate

 
 
Name of the Project Manager  Hill International
 
EHAF Consulting Engineer
 
Name of the Consultant: 

   
   
Name of Contractor 
Airolink Building Contracting LLC 
Inspection Request Ref No.    Date 

Location:    Time 

Area / Location:   

 
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
1  Visual Inspection of Assembly     
1.1  Overall Assembly Dimensions.   
1.2  General Arrangement layout as per the drawing.  
1.3  Verify whether enclosure is free from any external damages.  
1.4  Verify Electrical Clearance.   
1.5  Verify whether the panel is clean and free from foreign matter.  
1.6  Verify whether the alignment and tightness of the cubicles are proper.  
1.7  Verify whether the cables are properly glanded and terminated, if any.  
     
Verify shrouding provided for all live parts to prevent accidental 
1.8   
contact. 
1.9  Verify all warning labels are in right place.  
1.10  Settings of all Incoming, outgoing breakers & Over load Relays.  
2  Mechanical Tests     
2.1  Verify the tightness of bolts used in ACB Incoming and outgoing links.  
2.2  Verify the tightness of power and control wires.  
 
Verify whether the busbar links are properly bolted and are having red     
2.3   
marks for correct torque tightness. 
3  Electrical bonding between Mechanical Parts & Structure     
3.1  All Metal Parts & Main Earth Bar.  
3.2  Doors and Main Earth Bar.   

  SITE ACCEPANCE TEST – MCC FORM 2 & CP  1 of 7
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
3.3  Metallic Body of the Components Installed (if applicable).  
4  Insulation Resistance Test ( 500V /  1000V DC Megger)     
  Isolate control circuit including fuses, MCBs etc.     
4.1  Between phases to phases   
4.2  Between phases to neutral   
5  Functional test     
5.1  Operation of Incomer and outgoing breakers.  
5.2  Operation of Electrical and Mechanical interlocks.  
5.3  Check the operation of UVR, relay, contactors etc.  
     
parameter setting for VFD (Current, Speed, KW as per motor name 
5.4   
plate rating) 
     
Check the operation of starters (DOL, VFDs, Star Delta & Soft starters) 
5.5   
in Hand mode. 
     
Check the operation of starters (DOL, VFDs, Star Delta & Soft starters) 
5.6   
in Auto mode. 
     
Check the operation of VFDs by providing analog input signals and 
5.7   
verify analog outputs accordingly. 
     
Check the operation of Ammeters, Voltmeters, indication lamps, push 
5.8   
buttons and selector switches. 
5.9  Check the operation of thermostats, exhaust fans.  
     
Check the commands and status signals of feeders from remote 
5.10   
(BMS/PLC) in the control terminals provided, if available. 
     
Check the operation of starters during Earth leakage & Fire Alarm 
5.11   
signal from FACP. 
5.12  Functional test as per control philosophy.  
     
Measurement of 3phase voltage (400V AC) & 1phase voltage (230V 
5.13   
AC) @ outgoing terminals (when Breaker / starter in ON condition). 

  SITE ACCEPANCE TEST – MCC FORM 2 & CP  2 of 7
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 

TORQUE TEST DETAILS (FOR TRANSPORT JOINTS) 
 
LOCATION  BOLT SIZE  TORQUE  TEST RESULT 
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
Reference Values: 
 
TORQUE TIGHTNESS CHART
(WITH FLAT, SPRING WASHER & NUT)
Bolt Size (mm) TIGHTING TORQUE (N.m)
M6  7 Nm
M8  18 Nm
M10  37 Nm
M12  62 Nm
 
INSULATION RESISTANCE TEST DETAILS 
 
 
   
Insulation  IR Value in 
  Sl. 
  Resistance  Mega Ohms 
 
No 
1000VDC
 
  1  R ‐ Y  Ω
  2  Y ‐ B  Ω
  3  B ‐ R  Ω
 
  4  R ‐ N  Ω
  5  Y ‐ N  Ω
 
6  B ‐ N  Ω Reference Values: 
7  R ‐ E  Ω
For Insulation resistance test: ≥1MΩ 
8  Y ‐ E  Ω
9  B ‐ E  Ω
10  N ‐ E  Ω
  3 of 7
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 

VFD (SIMULATION) TEST RESULTS


 
     
 
  Frequency Input / Analog Measured    
Manual /
VFD Analog Input Output Voltage (V) – Speed Test
Auto
Ref No (Actual / Simulation) value Between any (RPM) Result
Operation
test (mA/V) phase

  SITE ACCEPANCE TEST – MCC FORM 2 & CP 
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 
 
Sl.   
VFD PARAMETERS 
No  SETTING  REMARKS
1  Basic Settings     
1.1  Nominal motor current     
1.2  Current limit     
1.3  Acceleration ramp time     
1.4  Initial starting torque     
1.5  Type of stop     
1.6  Deceleration ramp time     
1.7  Final deceleration torque     
1.8  Impulse braking torque level     
1.9  DC injection braking time     
2  Advance Settings     
2.1  Torque limit     
2.2  Voltage booster level     
2.3  Stator loss compensation     
2.4  Deceleration gain     
3  Protection Settings     
3.1  Motor overload protection     
3.2  Motor underload threshold     
3.3  Motor underload time     
3.4  Current overload protection     
3.5  Current overload timing     
3.6  Time before restarting     
3.7  Phase loss threshold     
3.8  Automatic restart     
4  Parameter Display Setting     
4.1  Power factor     
4.2  Motor thermal state     
4.3  Motor current     
4.4  Elapsed operating time     
4.5  Activate power     
4.6  Active power in kW     
4.7  Motor torque     
4.8  Display of current status     
4.9  Last detected fault     
4.10  Phase rotation direction     

  SITE ACCEPANCE TEST – MCC FORM 2 & CP 
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 
Sl.  BMS & FIRE ALARM INTERFACE TEST CHECK LIST   
No  STATUS  REMARKS 
PANEL REFERENCE : 
1  RUN STATUS     
2  START/STOP COMMAND     
3  VFD COMMAND     
4  VFD  FEEDBACK     
5  TRIP ALARM INDICATION     
6  VFD TRIP ALARM     
7  HOA SWITCH AUTO STATUS     
8  FIRE ALARM SIGNAL     
9  OPEN/CLOSE DAMPER STATUS     
10  FIRE CONDITION WORKING     
       
       
 
 
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR TESTING 
 
 
INST.  TEST  CAL.DUE 
DESCRIPTION  MAKE  MODEL  SL.NO 
REFERENCE  DATE 
             

             

             

             

             

             

             

  SITE ACCEPANCE TEST – MCC FORM 2 & CP 
 

 
 
   
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT 

 
   
MCC PANEL (FORM‐2)/CP SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST 
 
 
ANNEXURE 
(Comment / Observation) 
 
   
Sl. 
Comment / Observation  Responsibility  Complied Date 
No 
1       

2       

3       

4       

5       

6       

7       

8       

9       

10       
 
 
 
 
 
 
       
             
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

Name             

Signature             

Date             

             
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
Name of the Project:  EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY

 
Name of the Client:  Emirates Real Estate

 
 
Name of the Project Manager  Hill International
 
EHAF Consulting Engineer
 
Name of the Consultant: 

   
   
Name of Contractor  Airolink Building Contracting LLC 

Inspection Request Ref No.    Date 

Location:    Time 

Area / Location:   

 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
1  Visual Inspection of Assembly     
1.1  Overall Assembly Dimensions.   
1.2  General Arrangement layout as per the drawing.  
1.3  Verify whether enclosure is free from any external damages.  
1.4  Verify Electrical Clearance.   
1.5  Verify whether the panel is clean and free from foreign matter.  
1.6  Verify whether the alignment and tightness of the cubicles are proper.  
1.7  Verify whether the cables are properly glanded and terminated, if any.  
     
Verify shrouding provided for all live parts to prevent accidental 
1.8   
contact. 
1.9  Verify all warning labels are in right place.  
1.10  Settings of all Incoming and outgoing breakers.  
2  Mechanical Tests     
2.1  Verify the tightness of bolts used in ACB Incoming and outgoing links.  
2.2  Verify the tightness of power and control wires.  
     
Verify whether the busbar links are properly bolted and are having red 
2.3   
marks for correct torque tightness. 
3  Electrical bonding between Mechanical Parts & Structure     
3.1  All Metal Parts & Main Earth Bar.  
3.2  Doors and Main Earth Bar.   
3.3  Metallic Body of the Components Installed (if applicable).  
4  Insulation Resistance Test ( 500V /  1000V DC Megger)     

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
  Isolate control circuit including fuses, MCBs etc.     
4.1  Between phases to phases   
4.2  Between phases to neutral   
4.3  Between phases to earth (if applicable)  
4.4  Between neutral to earth (if applicable)  
 
5  Contact Resistance Test   
       
6  Functional test     
6.1  Operational test for metering devices and indication lamps.  
6.2  Operation of Incomer and outgoing breakers.  
6.3  Operation of Electrical and Mechanical interlocks.  
6.4  Functional test as per control philosophy.  
     
Measurement of 3phase voltage (400V AC) & 1phase voltage (230V 
6.5   
AC) @ outgoing terminals (when Breaker in ON condition). 
6.6  Checking of PLC/BMS signals to TBs.  
       
 
TORQUE TEST DETAILS 
 
 
LOCATION  BOLT SIZE  TORQUE  TEST RESULT 
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
 
Reference Values: 
 
TORQUE TIGHTNESS CHART
(WITH FLAT, SPRING WASHER & NUT)
Bolt Size (mm) TIGHTING TORQUE (N.m)
M6  7 Nm
M8  18 Nm
M10  37 Nm
M12  62 Nm
 
INSULATION RESISTANCE TEST DETAILS 
 
 
 
Insulation  IR Value in 
Sl. 
Resistance  Mega Ohms 
No 
1000VDC
1  R ‐ Y  Ω
2  Y ‐ B  Ω
3  B ‐ R  Ω
4  R ‐ N  Ω
5  Y ‐ N  Ω
6  B ‐ N  Ω
7  R – E  Ω
8  Y – E  Ω
9  B – E  Ω
10  N ‐ E  Ω
 
 
 
 
Reference Values:  For Insulation resistance test: ≥1MΩ 

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
  CONTACT RESISTANCE TEST DETAILS 
 
   
TEST  MEASURED 
JOINT  LOCATION 
CURRENT RESISTANCE
R PHASE BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
Y PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
B PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
NEUTRAL BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
EARTH BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
 
   
TEST  MEASURED 
JOINT  LOCATION 
CURRENT RESISTANCE
R PHASE BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
Y PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
B PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
NEUTRAL BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
EARTH BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
 
 
   
TEST  MEASURED 
JOINT  LOCATION 
CURRENT RESISTANCE
R PHASE BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
Y PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
B PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
NEUTRAL BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
EARTH BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
 
 
 
 
   
TEST  MEASURED 
JOINT  LOCATION 
CURRENT RESISTANCE
R PHASE BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 
Y PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
B PHASE BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
NEUTRAL BUSBAR  100A DC  µΩ 
EARTH BUSBAR    100A DC  µΩ 

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
 
 
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR TESTING 
 
 
INST.  TEST  CAL.DUE 
DESCRIPTION  MAKE  MODEL  SL.NO 
REFERENCE  DATE 
             

             

             

             

             

             

             

             

             

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
MDB - SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
 
ANNEXURE 
(Comment / Observation) 
 
   
Sl. 
Comment / Observation  Responsibility  Complied Date 
No 
1       

2       

3       

4       

5       

6       

7       

8       

9       

10       
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

Name             

Signature             

Date             

             

  SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST ‐ MDB 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
SMDB / ESMDB- SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
Name of the Project:  EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY

 
Name of the Client:  Emirates Real Estate

 
 
Name of the Project Manager  Hill International
 
EHAF Consulting Engineer
 
Name of the Consultant: 

   
   
Name of Contractor 
  Airolink Building Contracting LLC 

Inspection Request Ref No.    Date 

Location:    Time 

Area / Location:   

 
 
 
 
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
1  Visual Inspection of Assembly     
1.1  Overall Assembly Dimensions.   
1.2  General Arrangement layout as per the drawing.  
1.3  Verify whether enclosure is free from any external damages.  
1.4  Verify Electrical Clearance.   
1.5  Verify whether the panel is clean and free from foreign matter.  
1.6  Verify whether the alignment and tightness of the cubicles are proper.  
1.7  Verify whether the cables are properly glanded and terminated, if any.  
     
Verify shrouding provided for all live parts to prevent accidental 
1.8   
contact. 
1.9  Verify all warning labels are in right place.  
1.10  Settings of outgoing breakers.   
2  Mechanical Tests     
     
Verify the tightness of bolts used in ACB / MCCB Incoming and 
2.1   
outgoing links. 
2.2  Verify the tightness of power and control wires.  
 
Verify whether the busbar links are properly bolted and are having red     
2.3   
marks for correct torque tightness. 

 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
SMDB / ESMDB- SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
3  Electrical bonding between Mechanical Parts & Structure     
3.1  All Metal Parts & Main Earth Bar.  
3.2  Doors and Main Earth Bar.   
3.3  Metallic Body of the Components Installed (if applicable).  
4  Insulation Resistance Test ( 500V /  1000V DC Megger)     
  Isolate control circuit including fuses, MCBs etc.     
4.1  Between phases to phases   
4.2  Between phases to neutral   
4.3  Between phases to earth (if applicable)  
4.4  Between neutral to earth (if applicable)  
 
 
Sl.  Complying
ROUTINE TEST 
No  Yes  No
5  Functional test     
5.1  Operational test for metering devices and indication lamps.  
5.2  Operation of Incomer and outgoing breakers.  
5.3  Operation of Electrical and Mechanical interlocks.  
5.4  Functional test as per control philosophy.  
     
Measurement of 3phase voltage (400V AC) & 1phase voltage (230V 
5.5   
AC) @ outgoing terminals (when Breaker in ON condition). 
5.6  Checking of PLC/BMS signals to TBs.  
 
 
TORQUE TEST DETAILS AS APPLICABLE 
 
 
LOCATION  BOLT SIZE  TORQUE  TEST RESULT 
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   
  mm  N.m   

 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
SMDB / ESMDB- SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
Reference Values: 
 
TORQUE TIGHTNESS CHART
(WITH FLAT, SPRING WASHER & NUT)
Bolt Size (mm) TIGHTING TORQUE (N.m)
M6  7 Nm
M8  18 Nm
M10  37 Nm
M12  62 Nm
 
INSTRUMENTS USED FOR TESTING 
 
 
 
INST.  TEST  CAL.DUE 
DESCRIPTION  MAKE  MODEL  SL.NO 
REFERENCE  DATE 
             

             

             

             

             

             

             

             

             

 
 

 
 
   
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FORMAT

 
   
SMDB / ESMDB- SITE ACCEPTANCE TEST
 
ANNEXURE 
(Comment / Observation) 
 
   
Sl. 
Comment / Observation  Responsibility  Complied Date 
No 
1       

2       

3       

4       

5       

6       

7       

8       

9       

10       
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
     
Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

Name             

Signature             

Date             

             

 
 

 
 
 
 
FINAL DISTRIBUTION BOARD COMMISIONING REPORT

Name of the Project:


EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY
Name of the Client:
Emirates Real Estate
Name of the Project Manager
Hill International
Name of the Consultant:
EHAF Consulting Engineer
Name of Contractor   Airolink Building Contracting LLC 
Submitted on: Inspection on:
Inspection Request Ref. No.
 
Location: Date:

Area / Location: Time:

PANEL DETAILS INCOMING CABLE IR TEST (MΩ) PSCC & EFLI TEST

Supply Cable Size mm² Source ECC mm² R-Y R-B Y-B RYB-N RYB-E N-E CONT. Ipf Current: kA
 
protective Device Type Amps. Rating Amps Setting: Amps.
  Ze/Zdb: Ω 

           
    CABLE SIZE ECC MCCB MCCB RCD COLD TEST    
LIVE TEST
              Insulation Resistance (MΩ) 
 
Circuit Circuit Designation Remarks
           
Core mm² mm² Amps kA mA   Zs act. Zs max. Energised RCD (mS)
R--Y R-B Y-B RYB-N RYB-E N-E CONT. Polarity
Ω  Ω  date x1 x5

           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
           
Test Equipment / Model no. Serial No. Calibration Due Date:
Prepared By(LFC) Checked By
Name Date Signature Name Date Signature

             
Approved By Consultant (CML) Others
Name Date Signature Name Date Signature

       
Comments:
 

 
 

 
 
 
MAIN/SUB MAIN DISTRIBUTION BOARD (NORMAL/EMERGENCY) TEST REPORTS

Name of the Project: EREC Building 40 – MINISTRY OF ENERGY & INDUSTRY


Name of the Client:
Emirates Real Estate
Name of the Project
Manager Hill International
Name of the
Consultant: EHAF Consulting Engineer
Name of Contractor Airolink Building Contracting LLC
Building: Level:   Room: Panel Ref:
Panel Details: Panel IR Test (MΏ):   
Cable Size : ECC : Source : R-Y R-B Y-B RYB-N RYB-E N-E Continuity Polarity Ipf Current : KA

Protective Device Type : Rating : Setting: N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A   Ze/Zb: Ώ 

Circuit Details Cold Test Live Test


     
      Main
Cable
ECC MCCB MCCB MCCB ELCB Insulation Resistance (MΏ)    Ipf current Zs Act Zs. Max Energised ELCB(mS)
MCCB
Ckt.
Sl. No Circuit Designation Continuity Polarity MANUAL Functional Test
Reference        
TRIP TEST
(mm²) (mm²) Amps Type (kA) Rating R-Y R-B Y-B RYB-N RYB-E N-E kA (Ώ) (Ώ) (Date) X1 X5

1 RYB 1                                              
2 RYB 2                                              
3 RYB 3                                              
4 RYB 4                                              
5 RYB 5                                              
8 RYB 6                                              
7 RYB 7                                              
8 RYB 8                                              
9 RYB 9                                              
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 
                                                 
COMPANY LFC

Tested By Tests Witnessed By

Company LFC EHAF ABC HILL OTHERS

Name          
Signature          

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

APPENDIX –C
RISK ASSESSMENT
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
 

INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 
RISK ASSESSMENT 
 
Risk Assessment Number  C3-LFC- Date  14‐11‐2021  Assessment  Name  Designation  Signature & Date 
E/RA-022

 
Project:  Ministry of Energy & Industry Prepared By:  Rakesh Kumar Hse Officer
 
T&C of LV Switchgears  
Activity  Reviewed  and  
Approved  by:   
Elias Alkhoury 
Reason for Assessment  Initial Assessment
 
 
PERSONS AT RISK 
Own Employees   Sub‐contractors      Other Workers   Visitors   Public  

Young Persons   Pregnant Women   Lone Workers   Disabled   Other  


Your estimate of the total number of people affected  10+ public
 

 
HAZARDS 
Falls from Height    Falling Objects  Lifting Operation  Dust  Demolition 
 
Mobile Plant    Mobile Vehicles   Excavations    Confined Space   Buried Services  
Overhead Service    Manual Handling  Vibration    Noise   Fire or Explosion 
Fumes or Gas    Near or In Water   Collapse    Adverse Weather  Chemical  
Health  Physical  (details) 

    Residual  Action By 
HAZARD/RISK  Initial Risk  Existing Controls  ADDITIONAL CONTROL MEASURES  Risk Rating* 
Rating* 

 
L  S  (R)  L  S  (R 

 
 
* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐  L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 
 
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Document No  C3‐LFC‐E/RA‐017
Revision  Date  07‐10‐2021 

 
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 

 Unauthorized entry of person appointed for testing and commissioning activities   Competent supervision must be followed Officer


 Improper communication  All parts of racks and active components to be   Competent persons must be involved for the
 Poor lighting protected properly  testing activities
 Proper communication to be maintained between  LOTO/ESSW procedure to be followed
 Improper access
the commissioning team   Pre-commissioning check list must be filled and
 Using improper PPE for the ensure the system is ready for testing and no
task  Provide proper lighting
 All exits must be cleared and maintained properly. naked wires exposed anywhere on the panels or
 Use of unsafe tools in the other locations.
 Electrical Hazards  Full supervision must be available during
 Task specific hand gloves must be worn
 Fumes and Burns operation. whenever working with live electricity or
 Fire / Explosion  Ensure the area is clear and safe prior to the energized panels.
 Electrocution / Shock operation.  Permit must be obtained prior to commence the
 Visual inspections carried out by HSE officer work.
 Establish a work regimen where workers can be  Access must be controlled. Lock must be
provided on each panels to prevent unauthorized
rotated, allowing short rest periods to prevent
access.
effects due to heat during summer.  Ensure all outgoing cables terminated and no
 Use full body harness while working above 1.8 exposed.
meters and on edges
 Use proper task relevant PPE’s and mandatory
PPE’s while pulling the cable.
 Conduct Tool Box talks to highlight the hazard.
 Ensure workers are aware in the safe and correct
use of tools
 Cut pieces and scarp materials shall be disposed
in a dedicated waste area (As per procedure)
 All involved in the activity must wear task
relevant PPE’s.
 Housekeeping must be done on daily basis

Activity/Work : Using Live  DM COCSP Ch # 16 to be followed.  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing
Electricity for Testing & 4 4 16  Only the trained and experienced personnel will for all involved 2 3 6  Constructio
Commissioning LV System  Emergency procedures to be known to all n Manager
allow working for such activities.
 Overloading
 Standby electrical supervisor and certified
involved parties  Site
 Broken or damaged Wires  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks. Engineer
technician will engage for testing and  Supervisor/
 Fire  Ensure full time supervision for works
commissioning.  Any damaged or modified power tool shall not Foreman
*  Electrocution
See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐   ‐ Risk Rating 
Engineer will conduct pre-commissioning Continued?  YES / NO   Safety
‐ Likelihood,  S‐ Severity, R

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 
according to approved MSRA prior to start the allow using at the site. Officer
testing and commissioning.  LOTO/ESSW procedure to be followed.
 Appropriate PPE's such as safety goggles, hard  Ensure Fire extinguishing equipment shall be
hats, hand gloves, dust masks, ear protection will provided nearby.
 Energized panels must not be left open.
be worn by all.
 Signage must be in place on each panels to
 The electrical jobs / maintenance to be indicate the hazards.
competent electricians.
 Use of electrical tools as per manufacturer
instructions / specifications.
 Use of battery operated tools wherever possible.
 Proper tools and accessories must be used
Proper maintenance of Electrical tools/equipment
 All electrical tools/equipment must be PAT tested

Activity/Work : Use of Testers – 3 3 9  Ensure that only trained and experienced  Method Statement and Risk Assessment 1 2 2  Constructio
Megger and Multimeters technician is allowed to use those instruments. briefing for all involved n Manager
 Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks.  Site
 Ensure all multi meter and tester have valid
 Unauthorized/ untrained  Ensure full time supervision for works Engineer
person calibration certificate.  Supervisor/
 Faulty instrument  Ensure PTW are obtained prior to start testing Foreman
 Electrocution / electric Shock and commissioning.  Safety
 Adequate exclusion zone shall be established to Officer
prevent unauthorized entry into main control
room. All time supervision by task in charge for
the testing and commissioning task should be
available.
 Appropriate PPE's such as safety goggles, hard
hats, electrical rubber gloves, hand gloves, dust
masks, ear protection will be worn.

Activity/Work : Working on  DM COCSP CHAPTER 8: Scaffolding safety  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing
mobile scaffoldings 3 3 9 procedure must be followed. for all involved 1 2 2  Constructio
 Ensure proper and effective training has been  Emergency procedures to be known to all n Manager
 Damaged mobile scaffolding, given to the work force involved parties  Site
 Lack of information regarding  Provide competent supervision at all times  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks. Engineer
safe use of mobile scaffolding  Mobile Scaffoldings to be inspected and tagged  Ensure full time supervision for works  Safety

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐ L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 
by competent person  Officer
 Place the mobile scaffolding on firm level ground  Electrician
 Mobile scaffolding to be used only for light duty
work and for short duration works
 Ensure the mobile scaffoldings are placed in the
correct location and locked
 Never place the mobile scaffolding over electrical
circuit or over any material
 Maintain proper housekeeping in the working
area
 Never place the mobile scaffolding over loose
materials or over the material which are used to
cover openings
 Ensure that the mobile scaffolding are free from
any visual damage
 Mobile scaffolding should be free from grease
and oil
 Do not carry tools and equipment while climbing
down and while working
 Do not over-reach while working on mobile
scaffoldings
 Always face towards the mobile scaffolding while
climbing up and down and while working
 Always get off the mobile scaffolding before
trying to move it
 Mobile scaffolding should not be used near the
edges, openings, shafts/risers, at least 3m
distance.

Activity/Work : Hand Tools and 3 4 12  Ensure proper and effective training has been  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing 1 3 3  Constructio
Power Tools- given to the work force. for all involved n Manager
 Provide competent supervision at all times.  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks.  Site
 Electricity,  All cables must be protected from damages.  Ensure full time supervision for works Engineer
 Untrained Operatives,  All cables should be inspected prior to each use.  Adequate lighting shall be provided to ensure the  Supervisor/
 Faulty Equipment,  Ensure all power tools are with proper guard and good illumination on the working area Foreman
 Unsafe Power Tapping, handles.  Safety
 Ensure all tools are inspected and tagged prior to Officer
 Improper Selection of Tools
use.
 Short Circuit,  Never make any alteration on tools.
 Damage Cable,

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐  L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 
 Inadequate Instruction and  Ensure all power tools are P.A.T. tested and
Training, tagged.
 Instructions and Supervision,  Damaged tools to be returned and replaced
immediately.
 Maintain proper cable management at work area.
 Use only proper cables, sockets (Industrial
Socket) and connections.
 Do not use any electrical tool in damp or wet
location or with wet hands.
 Never pull electric tool from plug by the cord.
 Never carry the power tools by its cord.
 While working on edges tools must be secured
from falling down
 Do not leave the power tools unattended in an
energized position.
 Ensure temporary firefighting equipment’s are
available in the work area if any activity may
produce heat or spark and appropriate permit
(Hot Works) to be procured and the requirements
of the permit to be followed.
 Maintain proper storage for all power operated
equipment’s.
 All the hand tools must be inspected prior to
each use.
 Follow instructions from DM COCSP Ch 14
 Task relevant PPE’s to be worn by all employees

Activity/Work : Environmental 3 4 12  UAE ministry of labour mid-day break rule in  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing 1 3 3  Constructio
Hazards-Heat stress/Noise/Dust summer shall be adhered. for all involved n Manager
 Provision of drinking water for all work locations  Emergency procedures to be known to all  Site
 Operations during Windy as per Dubai Municipality decrees no 401/2015. involved parties Engineer
conditions  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks.  Plant
 Vehicular movement,
 Working in summer season must be carried out  Ensuring adequate cool drinking water is Manager
with extra care and caution, carryout work in available at each work place. Sweet drinks  Safety
 running equipment and tools,
Generators sessions, drink plenty of water, hydrolyte etc. should not be provided as they increase fluid Officer
 Working in Hot Temperatures  Toilets to have urine color charts posted to aid loss.
and High Humidity self-assessment of dehydration levels  Ensure full time supervision for works
 Outdoor work, workplace  An information campaign through toolbox talks
where there is no air stagnant, will be conduct around sites to inform the

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐ L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 
 Improper monitoring for workers of how to recognize the early symptoms
workplace temperature. of heat stress and the action to take to remain
hydrated.
 Ensuring availability and implementation for
emergency procedure( suitable & sufficient rest
areas, first aid kits, first aid providers,
communication channel with emergency
services…etc.)
 Provide approved oral rehydrating
solution/electrolyte form DM to compensate the
loss due to sweating.
 Provide sufficient ventilation in the work area.
 Sufficient rest and job rotation for the task
performers.
 Noise assessment to be carried out periodically.
 Workers must wear ear protection if the noise
level exceeds 85db.
 Operatives must wear dusk mask while working
at dusty area.
 Provide competent supervision at all times.
 Maintain proper housekeeping.

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐ L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
RISK ASSESSMENT 
General  DM COCSP Ch # 02 to be followed.  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing  Constructio
(Human Error)  Experienced and competent crew members to be for all involved n Manager
 Incompetent deployed for the job  Emergency procedures to be known to all  Site
 Improper planning involved parties Engineer
 Job to be continuously supervised by authorized
 coordination & communication  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks.  Plant
person.
 Ensure full time supervision for works Manager
 Short cutting of activities  Planning, preparation and TBT to be conducted  Safety
 Over confident with peers, subordinates and supervisors. Officer
 Absent minded  Follow task sequence
 Over work  Buddy system
 Supervisor to control the activities closely and
corrective action to be taken immediately as
required
 Work to be stopped if Supervisor is not present
 Supervisor to ensure the fitness of the crew

General: (Incorrect usage &  DM COCSP Ch # 02 to be followed.  Method Statement and Risk Assessment briefing  Constructio
storage of PPE / Inadequate  Approved & checked validity PPE to be worn at for all involved n Manager
PPE)  Emergency procedures to be known to all  Site
all times
 Untrained personnel involved parties Engineer
 Trained personnel
 Negligence  Daily task briefing and weekly Tool Box Talks.  Foreman
 Ensure availability  Ensure full time supervision for works  Safety
 Non availability
 JP to ensure the requirements Officer
 Using inadequate PPE
 Ensure long neck safety shoes.
 Over used &
deteriorated/damaged

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart ‐ L‐ Likelihood,   S‐ Severity, R‐ Risk Rating  Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev B
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location 
Revision Date
INTEGRATED MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 
RISK ASSESSMENT 

Risk Matrix (Severity = Probability X Consequence)


Severity  CONSEQUENCE (Potential severity of consequences of injury or damage) 
(1) Insignificant  (2) Minor (3) Moderate (4) Major (5) Catastrophic
(likelihood of failure of control 
PROBABILITY (LIKELIHOOD ) 

 Minor  injuries,  which  may  Injuries  requiring  on‐site  treatment  Serious    injuries    requiring    off‐site  Single fatality.   Multiple fatalities. 
require    self‐administered  by  medical  practitioner.  Personnel  treatment by medical practitioner or   Major  damage  to   Irreparable   damage   to   highly
first  aid.  Injured  personnel  unable  to  continue  to  perform  immediate  evacuation  to  hospital.  structures/items  of  cultural valued  structures/  items/
can  continue  to  perform  duties.  Potential  Long‐term  or  permanently  locations of cultural significance
measures) 

significance,  or  Major 


normal duties.   Minor  repairable  damage  to disabling effects.  or sacred value. 
 Minor  repairable  damage structures/items  of  cultural   Moderate  damage  to  structures/ infringement  of  cultural  values/   Loss  of  license  to  operate  or
to commonplace structures  significance, or minor infringements  items  of  cultural  significance,  or  sacred locations.  ability to produce indefinitely.
 Without causing  of cultural values.  significant  infringement  of  cultural   Production loss or delay for over  Severe  financial  penalties  or
production loss.   Production  loss  or  delay  up  to  one values/ sacred locations.  one month. legal  liabilities,  cost  to  repair, 
 Fines,  cost  to  repair,  plant  week.   Production loss or delay of 1 week ‐  Fines,  cost  to  repair,  plant plant  damage)  of  greater 
damage)  of  less  than   Fines, cost to repair, plant damage)  1month.  damage)  of  AED500,  000  ‐ thanAED10M. 
AED5, 000.  of AED5, 000 ‐ AED50, 000.   Fines,  cost to  repair,  plant damage)
AED10M. 
of AED50, 000 AED500, 000. 
(1) Rare -
Never occurred
1 2 3 4 5
(2) Possible
Has occurred
2 4 6 8 10
(3) Likely
Occurred more than 3 6 9 12 15
once
(4) Often
Occurs several times / 4 8 12 16 20
year
(5) Frequent
Occurs frequently
5 12 15 20 25

Risk Legend
1-3 Low No action required, unless escalation of risk is possible.
4-6 Moderate Activity or industry can operate subject to management and /or modification
8-12 High Activity or industry should be modified to include remedial planning and action and be subject to detailed EHS assessment.
15-25 Extreme Activity or industry should not proceed in current form.

* See the Risk Assessment Matrix Chart Continued?  YES / NO 

Control measures are required to ensure that the residual risk rating is at a minimum level so the activity can commence safely.  If the activity still has a high residual risk rating then it is necessary to find another 
method of carrying out the task. 
Document No HSE‐F‐01‐Rev A
This document becomes UNCONTROLLED once printed from the official CD or server location
Revision Date

You might also like