Accomplishment Tara Na Tayo'y Magbasa and Project C-Right

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 6

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: TARA NA, TAOY’Y MAGBASA______________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

OBJECTIVE TARGET ACCOMPLISHMENT REMARKS


- To reduce the number of non-readers. - The 49 identified non-readers during the - For the month of October during the first -Out of 49 identified non-readers 40
conduct of pre-reading assessment (PHIL- monitoring of achievement and gaps 18 (82%) of them have shown development
IRI Pre-test) will undergo the intensive (37%) of the identified non-readers in their reading skills. While 9 (18%) of
reading intervention. became decoder while 31 (63%) of them them are the remaining gaps to be catered
are the gaps who will undergo the during summer reading camp.
intensive reading intervention through
pull-out system classes.

-For the second phase of monitoring


conducted on the month of January 18
(37%) decoders show development in
their word recognition skills, while 22
(45%) of them are gaps for the month of
October, who are now decoders and the 9
(18%) of identified non-readers does not
show big improvements in their reading
skills.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: TARA NA, TAOY’Y MAGBASA______________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

INDICATORS FINDINGS
AGREEMENT
ACHIEVEMENT (%) GAP (%)
GOAL OBJECTIVES REMARKS (Action taken to
PROCESS OUTPUT ______37%_____ ______63%_____
address Gap/s)
As of October 2019 As of October 2019
- To reduce the - To increase the -Conduct of pull- -18 (37%) of -There were 18 -There are 31 -Out of 49 identified -Continue the conduct
number of non- reading skills (at least out classes for 40- identified non- (37%) of the (63%) of the non-readers from the of reading pull-out
readers. decoding skill) of the 50 minutes during readers becomes identified non- identified non- month of July are now classes using Tara Na,
identified non- vacant time of the decoder. readers became readers who are reduced to 31 (63%) and Tayo’y Magbasa and
readers. identified reading decoders. still in the process they are the gaps that other materials that
teachers using Tara -31 (63%) of of achieving at needs to have an can help struggling
Na, Tayo’y identified non- least the decoding intensive conduct of readers to become
Magbasa materials. readers are still in skills in reading. reading intervention to readers.
the process of become decoders.
achieving at least -Through the conduct of
the decoding skills. pull-out system class 18
(37%) of them are now
decoders.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RESULT ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: TARA NA, TAOY’Y MAGBASA______________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

DATA SOURCE FINDINGS CONCLUSION


-During the conduct of pre-reading - Result of pre-reading assessment (Phil- - Through the conduct of intensive -The conduct of intensive reading
assessment (PHIL-IRI Pre-test) there are Iri Pre-test). reading intervention and pull-out system, intervention through pull-out system
49 identified non-readers who are subject out of 49 identified non-readers from the really shows a big impact in decreasing
for the intensive reading intervention month of July, 40 (82%) of them have the number of non-readers. As the data
through pull-out system. shown development in their reading skills shows, 40 (82%) of the identified non-
during the first and second phase of readers showed development and
monitoring conducted from the month of improvement in their reading skills.
October and January. While the 9 (18%)
of them are the remaining gaps who will
be catered during summer reading camp.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: PROJECT C-RIGHT________________________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

OBJECTIVE TARGET ACCOMPLISHMENT REMARKS


- To increase the number of instructional - The 497 identified non-readers during - For the month of October during the first -Out of 497 identified frustration readers
readers. the conduct of pre-reading assessment monitoring of achievement and gaps, 168 325 (65%) of them show development in
(PHIL-IRI Pre-test) are subject for 1 hour (34%) of the identified frustration readers their reading level. While the 172 (35%)
reading class every day which can help become instructional readers while 329 of them are the remaining gaps who will
them develop their reading level. (66%) of them are the gaps who will continue the 1 hour intensive reading
undergo the intensive conduct of 1 hour intervention until the month of March.
reading intervention and help develop
their reading level.

-For the second phase of monitoring


conducted on the month of January the
168 (34%) instructional readers shows
improvement in becoming independent
readers, while 157 (31%) of them who are
gaps for the month of October are now
instructional readers and the remaining
172 (35%) of identified frustration readers
does not show big improvements in their
reading levels.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: PROJECT C-RIGHT________________________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

INDICATORS FINDINGS
ACHIEVEMENT (%) GAP (%) AGREEMENT
GOAL OBJECTIVES ______65%______ ______35%______ REMARKS (Action taken to
PROCESS OUTPUT
As of January 2020 As of January 2020 address Gap/s)
- To make the - To increase the number -Conduct of 1 -168 (34%) of -The 168 (34%) of -The 172 (35%) of -Out of 497 identified -Continue the conduct
identified frustration of instructional readers. hour reading identified the identified identified frustration frustration readers from of 1 hour reading class
readers becomes class as frustration instructional readers readers are still in the month of July are using the Project C-
instructional readers. stipulated in the readers who as of October are process of achieving now reduced to 172 Right materials and
class program become now showing the instructional (35%) and they are the other materials that
using the Project instructional improvements in reading level. gaps that still need to can help develop their
C-Right readers are now becoming develop their reading reading level from
material. showing independent readers. level. frustration to
improvements in -Through the conduct of instructional.
becoming -The 157 (31%) of 1 hour reading class
independent identified frustration every day, 157 (31%) of - Enrol the selected
readers. readers are now them develop their identified frustration
-157 (31%) of instructional readers. reading level from readers who did not
identified frustration to show any
frustration instructional. While the improvements in their
readers are now 168 (34%) instructional reading level until the
instructional readers as of October end of school year.
readers. show improvements in
-172 (35%) of their reading skills in
identified becoming independent
frustration readers.
readers are still
in process of
achieving the
instructional
reading level.

PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION RESULT ANALYSIS TEMPLATE

PROGRAM TITLE: PROJECT C-RIGHT________________________________________ IMPLEMENTATION PERIOD: JULY-MARCH


PROGRAM HOLDER: Kathleen Kay D. Subaldo______________________________

DATA SOURCE FINDINGS CONCLUSION


-During the conduct of pre-reading - Result of pre-reading assessment (Phil- - Through the conduct of 1 hour intensive -The conduct of 1 hour intensive reading
assessment (PHIL-IRI Pre-test) there are Iri Pre-test). reading intervention, out of 497 identified intervention shows a big impact in the
497 identified frustration readers who will frustration readers from the month of decreasing number of frustration readers.
undergo the 1 hour intensive reading July, 325 (82%) of them show As the data show, 325 (65%) of the
intervention to develop their reading development in their reading skills during identified frustration readers have shown
level. the first and second phase of monitoring development and improvement in their
conducted from the months of October reading level.
and January. While the 172 (35%) of
them are the remaining gaps who will
continue the 1 hour intensive reading
intervention until March.

You might also like