Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ethical Dilemma Analysis Worksheet
Ethical Dilemma Analysis Worksheet
Ethical Dilemma Analysis Worksheet
Michael To ensure the To take action Left the technician Supervise directly or To have the best
well-being of the unsupervised and have more than one interests of employees
employees and thus there was no person handling as well as the
follow safety concern machinery for safety organization
instructions of
Joshua
Joshua To secure the To oversee action Neglected training Train staff on the best
interests of the from Michael and emphasis on *OSHA practices to
company and Health and safety avoid injuries in the
the employees measures organization as well
as first aid.
Company To provide a To be in the best Has taken a back seat Establish *OSHA To ensure shareholder
safe position to to health and safety policies and steps to interests are met as
environment for continue and no training handling accidents to well as employees in
employees to operations avoid or manage the the company
work incidences.
Hospital Provide health To offer medical Has reported the Prompt response to
services and aid and report the organizations before the call to pick up the
report any case resulting in punitive injured employee.
incidences to measures causing
authorities organizations to
avoid them
The Ethical dilemma, in this case, presents Michael with an opportunity to do the best thing for one employee and put the company in
a difficult situation. The circumstance also puts him in a tough position due to the future prospects of him being in the company when
he does the right thing. By calling the ambulance, the company faces penalties, inspection requirements, and lawsuits that would
affect its operations in the future. Michael has proven himself to be valuable to the company and his efforts have seen the company
improve in production and revenues. By making the call against Joshua’s advice, Michael would be dismissed from the position
under the accusation of insubordination from his superior. Michael is also responsible for taking action in this circumstance that will
affect the company altogether.
Joshua is the manager and in control of the production department. Joshua answers to the executive and in this case, when the
incident is reported, the company’s credibility and image will be affected since it will be dealt with by external parties. Joshua sees the
consequences and how they affect the company and suggests a more reserved approach that will put the company’s interest first
before the employee. The result would be dire for the victim (Andrew) while the company will continue with its operations. He is
accountable for his department and would be liable for any punishment for the incident as the overall manager.
The company is directly affected by not having Occupational Safety and Health Administration in its facilities. The company could
face a halt in operation that will affect its business activities and any revenue generation in the future. This affects the employees who
also depend on the company for their incomes. The shareholders of the company are also affected as the earning ability of the
company has been reduced due to the incidence.
The hospital is responsible for the provision of medical services to the injured employee. They are also required to report any work-
related incidences in their reports to the authorities for measures to be taken. They are responsible for ensuring the victim regains
their physical health.
Government, either the state or federal government depending on the implementation authority is responsible to enforce safety
standards for companies within their jurisdiction. The authority is responsible to ensure the companies take care of their employees’
medical bills and their earning ability until they regain their physical health to work again. To do this they need to remind the
organizations of their responsibilities and measures they need to take to avoid accidents. In case of accidents, the government
authorities take measures that will encourage companies to adhere to occupational safety and health measures to avoid future
occurrences. This will dent the organization to serve as a lesson. However, the measures tend to push companies into hiding the
incidences to avoid the measures the government takes as it affects their operations.
2. Alternatives Analysis
Proposed Alternative 1: State Alternative Here
The first alternative is for Michael to use a personal vehicle to carry Andrew to the hospital for treatment. Michael with another staff
will assist in taking Andrew to the car park where he will be transferred to the hospital without having to call an ambulance. In this
instance, the company will not be recorded in the hospital where the incidence occurred. They will also forego any responsibility that
Andrew will incur. Michael picks this choice to agree with his supervisor in favor of the company against the employee’s health. It is
favorable to the company, his career progression, and the future relationship with his superior. However, it is demeaning to the
injured staff and internally conveys the message to the staff that they are not important. This decision in this scenario is Michael’s
ethical duty to obey his superior who has advised against calling an ambulance.
Government Short Companies are complying and no danger to Short: The punitive measures are not meted out on the
people’s lives organization
Long: Companies are committed to OSHA Long: Companies don’t adhere to policies and
regulations regulations resulting in more cases.
Government Short: Organization stick to OSHA regulations Short: The punitive measures meted out on the
Long: There are minimal occupational accidents organization
Long: Companies do not report accidents
Note: You are expected to analyze between two to three alternatives. This section applies only if you have three
alternatives. You can erase this section if you only have two alternatives.
Michael speaks to Joshua and informs him the situation is critical for Andrew. Suggests that Joshua calls the ambulance
and they will deal with the problems later. In this situation, Michael speaks to Joshua and they detail all the possible
consequences of this scenario and they agree to do the best for the organization and the injured staff. It involves
committing to deal with the punitive results of the accidents as well as having the staff obtain the best medical response
from a professional. In this instance, the consequences are absorbed by the two and the result is positive acceptance by
the staff but at a disadvantage for the company. The fine and measures imposed by the authorities will then be absorbed
by the whole organization including the other staff. This is best practice and represents the values of the company and
how they value their employees.
Michael Short: Appreciated by staff for his action Short: Reprimanded for the incidence
Long: His team appreciates him more and works Long: Enforce strict OSHA regulations that result in low
selflessly for the company staff morale
Joshua Short: Appreciated by staff for his action Short: Reprimanded for the incidence
Long: His team appreciates him more and works Long: Initiate strict OSHA regulations that result in low
selflessly for the company staff morale
Company Short: Appreciated by staff for taking care of its Short: Fined and flagged for the accident
people Long: Operations pause for some time affecting revenues
Long: Low turnover rates
Hospital Short: Offer prompt medical aid Short: People are cautious about engaging hospitals
Long: People are not fearful of contacting them Long: Patients suffer or even die from a lack of prompt
requests for assistance from hospitals
Government Short: Organization stick to OSHA regulations Short: The punitive measures meted out on the
Long: There are minimal occupational accidents organization
Long: Companies do not report accidents
Once you have completed this worksheet, submit it to your Open Learning Faculty Member for grading.