Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

International Journal of Surgery 12 (2014) S20eS22

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Surgery


journal homepage: www.journal-surgery.net

Original research

Fast track for elderly patients: Is it feasible for colorectal surgery?


Rita Compagna, Giovanni Aprea, Davide De Rosa, Maurizio Gentile, Giovanni Cestaro,

D
Gabriele Vigliotti, Tommaso Bianco, Guido Massa, Maurizio Amato, Salvatore Massa,
Bruno Amato*
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Via S. Pansini, 5, 80131 Napoli, Italy

TE
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Background: Fast-track program has been applied in several surgical fields. However, currently many
Received 15 May 2014 surgical patients are elderly over 70 years of age, and discussion about the application of such protocols
Accepted 15 June 2014 for elderly patients is inadequate. Materials and methods: The present study was designed to consider
Available online 23 August 2014
the safety and feasibility of application of a fast-track program after colorectal surgery in elderly patients.
A total of 76 elderly patients with colorectal cancer who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection
Keywords:
Fast-track rehabilitation
Laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Elderly patients
C
were randomly assigned to receive either the fast-track care program (n ¼ 40) or the conventional
perioperative care protocol (control group, n ¼ 36). The fast track protocol included no preoperative
mechanical bowel irrigation, immediate oral alimentation and earlier postoperative ambulation exercise.
The length of postoperative hospital stay, the length of time to regain bowel function and the rate of
postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The length of time to
A
regain bowel function, including the passage of flatus [32 (24e40) h vs 42 (32e52) h], and to start a
liquid diet (13 [10e16] h v/s 43 [36e50] h) were significantly shorter in patients receiving the fast track
care protocol compared with those receiving the conventional care protocol. A shorter duration of
postoperative hospital stay was recorded in patients receiving the fast-track program than in those
receiving conventional care [6 (5e7) days v/s 9.5 (7e12) days]. A reduced percentage of patients who
R

developed general complications was also observed in the fast-track group (5.0% v/s 18%). Conclusion:
Fast-track after laparoscopic colorectal surgery can be safely applied in carefully selected elderly patients
older than age 70 years. The fast-track recovery program resulted in a more rapid postoperative recovery,
earlier discharge from hospital and fewer general complications compared with a conventional post-
operative protocol.
ET

© 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction use of a nasogastric tube, starvation for several postoperative days


until the recovery of bowel movement and bed rest in the imme-
Traditionally, patients undergoing colorectal surgery were diate postoperative period followed by ward ambulation on post-
treated within a perioperative care protocol, which included the operative days 1 or 2. Restarting oral alimentation was based on
R

the passage of gas or faeces, usually several days following surgery.


The concept of fast-track (enhanced recovery after surgery, ERAS)
was introduced to colorectal surgical practice by Kehlet [1]. Fast-
track protocols combine multidisciplinary perioperative care stra-
List of abbreviations: ERAS, enhanced recovery after surgery; FT, fast-track; ASA, tegies, including extensive preoperative counseling, no bowel
American Society of Anesthesiologists; IV PCA, intravenous patient controlled
analgesia; NSAIDs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications; UICC, Union for
preparation, no sedative premedication, carbohydrate-loaded liq-
International Cancer Control. uids until 2 h before surgery, effective multimodal pain manage-
* Corresponding author. ment, short-acting anesthetics, adequate perioperative fluid
E-mail addresses: ritacompagna@libero.it (R. Compagna), aprea@unina.it management, small incisions, and no routine use of drains and
(G. Aprea), david.derosa@unina.it (D. De Rosa), magentile@unina.it (M. Gentile),
nasogastric tubes. Postoperative care includes early oral feeding,
gcestaro@unina.it (G. Cestaro), federer2987@hotmail.it (G. Vigliotti),
tommasobianco85@gmail.com (T. Bianco), guido.massa@libero.it (G. Massa), enforced mobilization, early removal of bladder catheter and
maurizioamato@gmail.com (M. Amato), smassa@unina.it (S. Massa), bruno. standard laxative [2].
amato@unina.it (B. Amato).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.389
1743-9191/© 2014 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
R. Compagna et al. / International Journal of Surgery 12 (2014) S20eS22 S21

The concept of fast-track (FT) rehabilitation has been recently without nausea or vomiting, adequately controlled pain, free
introduced with the intent to improve perioperative management ambulation and defecation, no surgical complications,
by reducing stress and complications suffered by patients, short- normothermia.
ening the length of hospital stay, and reducing costs of resection of
colorectal cancer. A systematic review that included several ran- 3. Results
domized, controlled trials examined the evidence for fast track
protocols compared with traditional care [3e4]. Currently, laparo- Of the 76 enrolled patients, 40 in the fast-track rehabilitation
scopic surgery has been accepted as the surgery of choice for group (FT group) and 36 in the conventional care group (control
colorectal cancer because it minimizes invasive injury and has a group) were analyzed. No statistically significant differences in
comparatively safe profile. We set up a randomized controlled baseline characteristics, age (71 v/s 72) and gender ratio (M22/F18
clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a fast- v/s M20/F16), were noted between the two groups. Duration of
track recovery program for elderly patients undergoing laparo- surgery (130 min v/s 110 min), intra-operative blood loss (50 ml v/s
scopic colorectal surgery comparing with traditional care. 55 ml) and numbers of lymph nodes resected (15 v/s 15) were not
significantly different between the fast-track group and the control

D
2. Material and methods group.
Of the 76 enrolled patients, 15 were classified as stage I, 21 as
Participants were recruited from the Department of Gastroen- stage II and 40 as stage III based on the TNM classification system of
terology, Endocrinology and Surgery, University Federico II of the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). The length of
Naples, from April 2010 to October 2013. Criteria for patients follow up ranged from 3 to 40 months. One patient had local

TE
selected for the study were as follows: age over 70 years; a diag- recurrence after rectal carcinoma surgery, one had hepatic metas-
nosis of colorectal cancer and undergoing laparoscopic colorectal tasis after right hemicolectomy, two patients died from myocardial
resection. Patients were excluded from the study if they were infarction and one patient died from hepatic metastasis. No sig-
younger than 70 years of age, they underwent an emergency sur- nificant differences were observed in mortality between the two
gery, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class IV, or groups. Significantly accelerated recovery was found in patients
required postoperative intensive care or conversion to an open receiving fast-track care compared with patients receiving con-
procedure. A total of 76 patients were enrolled. After obtaining ventional care. A shorter duration of postoperative hospital stay
informed consent, a randomization process was carried out. Over-
C was recorded in patients in the fast-track program compared with
all, 40 patients were assigned to the fast-track rehabilitation pro- those in the control group. A reduced number of patients devel-
tocol and 36 patients were assigned to the conventional care group. oping complications was also observed in the fast-track group (5.0%
Of the 76 patients in the study, 42 were men and 34 were women. v/s 18%).
The median age for all patients was 72 years. Patients underwent
the following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n ¼ 8), left hemi- 4. Discussions
A
colectomy (n ¼ 12), transverse colectomy (n ¼ 2), sigmoid colec-
tomy (n ¼ 40) and anterior resection (n ¼ 14). The study was Laparoscopic colorectal resection is now a definite treatment for
approved by the local Ethical Committee and written informed colorectal cancer. Fast-track rehabilitation offers a multimodal
consent was obtained from all patients before participation in the perioperative care plan for patients undergoing elective surgery
R

study. that reduces complications and speeds recovery also in elderly


The protocols of fast-track rehabilitation programs typically patients. In contrast to protocols of classic perioperative care, the
include no bowel preparation except one or two enemas in cases of fast-track rehabilitation protocol does not require fast infusion of
rectal surgery, continuation of a normal diet until 8 h before sur- fluid, intestinal antibiotics and mechanical bowel preparation in
gery, no routine use of nasogastric tubes, postoperative pain control the perioperative period [5]. According to the fast-track protocol
ET

with intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA), and mini- regarding the limitation of fluid administration intra- and post-
mization of opioid use except for in patients with a contraindication operatively, elderly patients can avoid the fluideelectrolyte
to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications (NSAIDs). One or imbalance that can be induced by preoperative prolonged fasting,
two doses of prophylactic antibiotics consisting of a second- massive bowel preparation, and overloading of the cardiopulmo-
generation cephalosporin were used on the day of surgery. On nary system. Using pneumatic compression stockings intra-
postoperative day (POD) 1, patients were permitted water intake operatively and encouraging early ambulation can prevent throm-
and urinary catheters were removed. Ambulation was encouraged. boembolic complications. The restriction of opioids can reduce the
For rectal cancer patients, the urinary catheter was removed on the incidence of ileus and gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea or
R

second or third postoperative day. Patients were given a soft diet on vomiting, and related complications, such as aspiration [6]. Recent
POD 2. studies have shown, however, that ileus can be significantly
On POD 3, a normal diet was permitted, IV fluid administration reduced by the use of epidural analgesia with local anesthetics [7].
was discontinued, and analgesia was changed to oral medicine if Preoperative bowel preparation in traditional colorectal surgery
appropriate. On the next day, any abdominal drains placed during involves oral administration of intestinal antibiotics for 3 days and
surgery were removed. Patients without problems were discharged administration of a preoperative mechanical enema to clean the
on POD 5. faecal contents from the colon, aiming to reduce the numbers of
Duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, intraoperative blood intestinal bacteria, thereby ensuring safe surgery. The practice is
loss and complications, including wound infection, anastomotic widely adopted in clinics, but there is no clear evidence of benefit
leakage, pulmonary infection, intestinal obstruction and the length for patients [8]. Instead, one study even showed that preoperative
of hospital stay were recorded by the surgeon. The time to passage bowel preparation was associated with higher risks of anastomotic
of the first flatus, to ambulation and to diet were self-reported by leakage and postoperative infectious complications [9]. Bacterial
the patient and recorded by the nurse. Follow up started immedi- translocation is possibly a detrimental effect of preoperative me-
ately after discharge from hospital through telephone queries and chanical bowel preparation, caused by a reduction in the levels of
was continued every 3 months thereafter at hospital appointments. intestinal flora and reduced efficacy of the mucosal mechanical
Discharge criteria were as follows: tolerance of a normal diet barrier. Postoperative infection results in more treatment failures in
S22 R. Compagna et al. / International Journal of Surgery 12 (2014) S20eS22

elderly patients as a result of weak immunity. Therefore, we did not Guido Massa: Participated substantially in conception, design,
perform preoperative mechanical bowel preparation in patients of and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of
the fast-track group [10]. Nowadays, more and more laparoscopic data.
surgery has been applied in the treatment of colorectal cancer. This Maurizio Amato: Participated substantially in conception,
procedure significantly reduces trauma and speeds up the reha- design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter-
bilitation of patients following surgery. Shorter hospital stay and pretation of data; also participated substantially in the drafting and
lower rates of hospital readmission have been reported [11]. editing of the manuscript.
Salvatore Massa: Participated substantially in conception,
5. Conclusion design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter-
pretation of data; also participated substantially in the drafting and
In studies involving younger patients, similar effects, such as editing of the manuscript.
shortening the length of time to the passage of flatus, to food intake Bruno Amato: Participated substantially in conception, design,
and to hospital discharge, and reduced rates of hospital read- and execution of the study and in the analysis and interpretation of
mission, were observed [12,13]. It may be argued that fast-track data.

D
colonic surgery could lead to a higher readmission rate, but more
than 65 percent of these readmissions occurred after postoperative
day five and therefore might not have been prevented by a longer Conflicts of interest
hospital stay. Also, other studies have indicated that readmissions
after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted [14e18]. In the present All Authors have no conflict of interests.

TE
study there were not readmissions connected with acute life-
threatening conditions, even in the cases with anastomotic dehis-
References
cence. Our perioperative fast-track care program provided safe and
effective care management for elderly patients undergoing lapa- [1] H. Kehlet, Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and
roscopic colorectal surgery and also improved clinical outcomes in rehabilitation, Br. J. Anaesth. 78 (1997) 606e617.
[2] B. Amato, M. Donisi, C. Rispoli, M. Gentile, L. Sivero, Enhanced recovery after
the short term. The study has been continued for a further
surgery (ERAS) program in the elderly: is it feasible? Chirurgia Turin 26 (4)
assessment of its long-term effects in the elderly population. In (2013) 307e308.
conclusion, a fast-track surgery recovery protocol is superior to a
C [3] M. Gatt, A.D. Anderson, B.S. Reddy, P. Hayward-Sampson, I.C. Tring, J. MacFie,
conventional protocol for perioperative care management of Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in pa-
tients undergoing major colonic resection, Br. J. Surg. 92 (2005) 1354e1362.
elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery. [4] C.K. Khoo, C.J. Vickery, N. Forsyth, N.S. Vinall, I.A. Eyre-Brook, A prospective
randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management pro-
Ethical approval tocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer, Ann. Surg.
245 (2007) 867e872.
A
[5] B. Kaltoft, I. Gogenur, J. Rosenberg, Reduced length of stay and convalescence
Local Board approved the study. in laparoscopic vs open sigmoid resection with traditional care: a double
blinded randomized clinical trial, Colorectal Dis. 13 (2011) e123ee130.
[6] L. Basse, D.H. Jakobsen, P. Billesbølle, M. Werner, H. Kehlet, A clinical pathway
Funding to accelerate recovery after colonic resection, Ann. Surg. 232 (2000) 51e57.
[7] K. Holte, H. Kehlet, Postoperative ileus: a preventable event, Br. J. Surg. 87
R

All Authors have no source of funding. (2000) 1480e1493.


[8] P. Bucher, P. Gervaz, C. Soravia, et al., Randomized clinical trial of mechanical
bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal
Author contribution surgery, Br. J. Surg. 92 (2005) 409e414.
[9] C.E. Pineda, A.A. Shelton, T. Hernandez-Boussard, et al., Mechanical bowel
preparation in intestinal surgery: a meta-analysis and review of the literature,
Rita Compagna: Participated substantially in conception,
ET

J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12 (2008) 2037e2044.


design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- [10] M.S. Vlug, J. Wind, E. van der Zaag, et al., Systematic review of laparoscopic vs
pretation of data. open colonic surgery within an enhanced recovery programme, Colorectal
Giovanni Aprea: Participated substantially in conception, Dis. 11 (2009) 335e343.
[11] S.R. Steele, T.A. Brown, R.M. Rush, et al., Laparoscopic v/s open colectomy for
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- colon cancer: results from a large nationwide population-based analysis,
pretation of data; also participated substantially in the drafting and J. Gastrointest. Surg. 12 (2008) 583e591.
editing of the manuscript. [12] J. Andersen, H. Christensen, J.H. Pachler, et al., Effect of the laxative magne-
sium oxide on gastrointestinal functional recovery in fast-track colonic
Davide De Rosa: Participated substantially in conception, resection: a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study, Colorectal
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- Dis. 14 (2012) 776e782.
n, E. Wennberg, Fast-track concepts in major open upper abdominal
R

pretation of data. [13] M.F. Olse


and thoracoabdominal surgery: a review, World J. Surg. 35 (2011)
Maurizio Gentile: Participated substantially in conception, 2586e2593.
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- [14] K. Azimuddin, L. Rosen, J.F. Reed III, J.J. Stasik, R.D. Riether, I.T. Khubchandani,
pretation of data. Readmissions after colorectal surgery cannot be predicted, Dis. Colon Rectum
44 (2001) 942e946.
Giovanni Cestaro: Participated substantially in conception, [15] B. Amato, L. Sivero, G. Vigliotti, M. Gentile, M. Donisi, Surgery for cancer in the
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- elderly: state of the art, Chirurgia Turin 26 (4) (2013) 313e315.
pretation of data. [16] C. Rispoli, N. Rocco, L. Iannone, B. Amato, Developing guidelines in geriatric
surgery: role of the grade system, BMC Geriatr. 9 (Suppl. 1) (2009) A99.
Gabriele Vigliotti: Participated substantially in conception,
[17] D. Loffredo, A. Marvaso, S. Ceraso, B. Amato, M. Cinelli, Minimal invasive
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- surgery in treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinomas: case
pretation of data. studies and survival rates, BMC Surg. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2013) S45, http://
Tommaso Bianco: Participated substantially in conception, dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S45.
[18] S. Perrotta, G. Quarto, V. Desiato, B. Amato, G. Benassai, TEM in the treatment
design, and execution of the study and in the analysis and inter- of recurrent rectal cancer in elderly, BMC Surg. 13 (Suppl. 2) (2013) S56,
pretation of data. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-13-S2-S56.

You might also like