Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aid Cuts One Year On: How An Independent Scotland Could Approach Aid Spending Differently
Aid Cuts One Year On: How An Independent Scotland Could Approach Aid Spending Differently
ONE YEAR ON
HOW AN INDEPENDENT
SCOTLAND COULD APPROACH
AID SPENDING DIFFERENTLY
July 2022
SNP Westminster Foreign Affairs Team
1
SNP Wesminster Foreign Affairs Team Aid Cuts One Year On
Foreword
The SNP is committed to ensuring that Scotland continues to be a good global citizen, working in
partnership with others across the world to address global challenges that can only be tackled collectively.
We are committed to achieving the UN’s Sustainable Developments Goals (SDGs) for peace and prosperity
for people and the planet, and we recognise that issues such as global poverty and inequality, ongoing
and future humanitarian crises, and the evolving climate emergency will not be overcome by nations
working alone and in their own self-interest.
Recent global events have brought all of this into sharp perspective.
The Covid-19 pandemic has been a worldwide health and economic crisis, disproportionately affecting
already vulnerable and disadvantaged groups of people. In 2020, the steady decline of the number
of people living in extreme poverty — on less than $1.90 per person per day – was interrupted when
poverty rose for the first time in nearly 25 years. While this has recently resumed its downward trajectory,
the World Bank estimates that between 75 million and 95 million additional people could be living in
extreme poverty in 2022 compared to pre-Covid projections.
Ongoing and emerging conflicts around the world have similarly plunged people into poverty and
contributed to a cycle of displacement, disease and death.
Now more than ever, the international community should be redoubling efforts to face these challenges
head on, providing the resources required to play an active role in alleviating global poverty, and striving
to achieve the SDGs. We should be stepping up, not stepping away.
Yet against this backdrop of the past two years, the UK Government has done the opposite having
u-turned on its own manifesto commitments, defied its own legislation, and most significantly betrayed
its commitments to the poorest and most vulnerable people on the planet. It has retreated from the
world at the exact moment it should have been leading.
When it was announced in June 2020 that the Department for International Development was to be
abolished and merged into the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, warnings were made that it would
lead to a loss of focus on poverty alleviation in favour of acting in the UK’s national interests prioritising
aid-for-trade, a brain drain with key knowledge and expertise within the department disappearing, and
an imminent threat to the aid budget.
The merger of the departments has meant that there is no longer a Secretary of State for International
Development in attendance at cabinet. Within the new Foreign, Commonwealth and Development
Office, there is no International Development Minister advocating for those without a voice. And during
the first year of the department’s existence, nearly 100 former DFID technical directors left the FCDO with
no one hired to replace them.
Despite a legally-binding commitment to spend the internationally agreed target of 0.7% of GNI on
official development assistance and despite all political parties in Westminster committing to this in
their manifestos, the UK Government used the impact of Covid on the country’s finance as an excuse to
introduce an ideologically-driven cut to the aid budget.
2
While other G7 countries such as Canada, France, Italy, the US and Germany increased their aid
spending in response to the pandemic, the UK was alone in turning inwards.
The reduction in spending from 0.7% to 0.5% has been catastrophic. Over £4billion has been wiped
from the aid budget, a cut of nearly one-third compared to the previous year. Life-saving programmes
focussed on healthcare, climate, conflict, and nutrition have faced cuts of up to 35%. Countries facing
some of the worst humanitarian crises such as Bangladesh, Ethiopia and Yemen have seen cuts to
bilateral aid of up to 65%.
The cuts are not just figures and percentages on a spreadsheet, these cuts cost lives.
This week marks one year since Tory MPs in the House of Commons voted in favour of this indefinite
aid cut. The SNP has been consistent in our opposition to this, will continue to argue for a return to
0.7%, and want no part in the damage being inflicted on vulnerable people throughout the world.
And while the UK Government has shown that it can no longer be a trusted partner, the SNP Scottish
Government has shown that it is committed to playing its part in assisting and empowering other and
delivering aid for the world’s poorest and most vulnerable people.
Scotland was the first country to set up a dedicated Climate Justice Fund which will double to £24
million over the next four years. The Scottish Government’s International Development Fund will
increase from £10 million to £15 million. Scotland is already demonstrating that it sees international
development very differently from the UK Government and is stepping up its global contributions
rather than retreating inwards and focussing on self-interest.
Building on the work already undertaken by the Scottish Government, spending 0.7% of GNI on ODA
focussed on poverty alleviation, and embedding policies targeting the most marginalised groups,
Scotland can fulfil its role as a good global citizen and make distinctive contributions in addressing the
global challenges we face.
Chris Law MP
SNP Shadow Secretary of State for
International Development
3
SNP Wesminster Foreign Affairs Team Aid Cuts One Year On
o An estimated 20 million women and girls who will not receive support
from UK Aid this year, compared to 2019.
o 6.2 million girls under 2, and 12 million babies overall, won’t receive
nutritional support.
4
SNP Westminster Foreign Affairs Team Aid Cuts One Year On
o 1200 Nigerian women displaced by violence and conflict and women from
host communities in Bauchi State will not be able to partake in a programme
developing their vocational and business skills to improve their livelihoods.
Source: https://www.one.org/international/impact-of-uk-aid-cuts/
5
Key Policy Proposals
Strategy
• Make ‘helping the furthest behind first’ the basis for all International
Development policy in an Independent Scotland.
6
Climate
• Work with international partners in the Global North to encourage states
that haven’t already to lead by Scotland’s example, and to set up domestic
Climate Justice Funds of their own.
Health
• Double aid spend commitment focused on projects covering to sexual and
reproductive health and rights, family planning and the provision of free,
sustainable period products over 5 years following Scottish Independence.
7
AID CUTS
ONE YEAR ON