Professional Documents
Culture Documents
In The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1625 of 2021
In The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1625 of 2021
==========================================================
CHAUDHARY PRAVINBHAI REVABHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR TUSHAR CHAUDHARY(5316) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MR NIKHIL S VYAS(5663) for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 2
MS. M.H. BHATT, APP for the Opponent(s)/Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
Date : 02/03/2022
ORAL ORDER
event of his arrest in connection with the FIR being registered vide
Dist-Mehsana for the offence punishable u/s. 323, 332, 504, 506(2)
and 114 of Indian Penal Code and Section 3(2(5-a) of the of the
1989 (for short "the Atrocities Act"), wherein learned 3rd Additional
Page 1 of 9
20.10.2021.
with the said offence. That if the allegations levelled in the FIR is
3(2)(5-a) of Atrocities Act are made out. That from the bare of the
FIR, it appears that no any abusive words are used by the appellant
was not aware about the caste of the complainant. That appellant has
have strongly opposed the prayer made by the appellant referring the
Page 2 of 9
servant, appellant has committed this offence along with other co-
appearing for the respondent No.2 and learned APP for the
saying that whey they had cut off the lights of his village and thereby
started abusing him on phone and further it is that after some time
appellant along with other three persons came at the sub-station and
started giving kick and fist blows and also had given threates and
thereafter he had left the place and the complainant and other
Page 3 of 9
the complainant as appellant was not at all aware about the caste of
by Investigating Officer.
Supreme Court has held that there is no absolute bar against grant of
Page 4 of 9
to be prima facie mala fide. View taken by the High Court of Gujarat
of 2018, it was opined that direction nos.(iii) and (iv) issued by the
bail. This Court has made scrutiny of the complaint and prima facie,
Page 5 of 9
and Ors, reported in (2008)12 Supreme Court Cases 531, it was held
ought to have alleged that the appellant- accused was not a member
Page 6 of 9
(f) shall not leave India without the permission of the Trial
Court and if having passport shall deposit the same before
the Trial Court within a week; and
Page 7 of 9
the appellant. The appellant shall remain present before the learned
police remand.
14. This is, however, without prejudice to the right of the accused
15. At the trial, the trial Court shall not be influenced by the prima
on bail.
Page 8 of 9
(B.N. KARIA, J)
SUYASH
Page 9 of 9