TPS (Think Pair Share)REPORT

Syed Ayub Ahmed

PGP-DSBA Online

Date:15/03/2021
Table of Contents
Contents
Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................4
Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................4
Data Description ...................................................................................................................................4
Sample of the dataset: ..........................................................................................................................4
Exploratory Data Analysis .....................................................................................................................5
Let us check the types of variables in the data frame. ..................................................................... 5-6
Check for missing values in the dataset: ...............................................................................................6
Pair Plot .................................................................................................................................................6
Box Plot......................................................................................................................................7
List of Figures
Fig.1 – Pair plot………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….6
Fig.2 – Correlation Heatmap………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………7
Fig.3– Products…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..11
Fig.4– Outlier……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..20
Fig.5– Histplot……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………28

List of Tables
Table 1. Dataset Sample………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4
Table 2. Summary of the data …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7-10
Table 3. Data of Survey………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… .21
Table 4. Gender and Major……….……………………………………………………………………………………………………………22
Table 5. Gender and Grad Intention……………………………………………………………………………………………….21 & 25
Table 6. Gender and Employment………………………………………………………………………………………………….21 & 26
Table 7. Gender and Computer……………………………………………………………………………………………………..22 & 25
Table 8. Contingency table for Gender & Major…………………………………………………………………………….23 & 24
Table 9. 2*2 table of Gender and Intent to Graduate…………………………………………………………………………….27

Executive Summary
Problem 1
Question 1:
Case Snippet 1A) A pollution control inspector suspected that a riverside community was
releasing semi-treated sewage into a river and this, as a consequence, was reducing the
level of dissolved oxygen of the river. He drew 15 randomly selected specimens of river water at a
location above the town and another 15 specimens below to check this. The
dissolved oxygen readings, in parts per million, are given in the accompanying table.
Is the suspicion of the pollution control inspector valid? Did he have to do any assumptions
to test his suspicion?
Introduction
The purpose of this whole exercise is to explore the dataset. Do the exploratory data analysis.

Data Description
1.ABOVE TOWN: oxygen readings, per million

2.BELOW TOWN: oxygen readings, per million

Sample of the dataset:

The data is given as shown below:
Exploratory Data Analysis
Let us check the types of variables in the data frame

Check for missing values in the dataset:

Data has 2 variables Above Town and Below Town which float type.

Summary of the data:

As per the above summary we can infer that Standard DEVIATION for Below Town is higher which
than Above Town specimen readings which means Specimen drawn from the Below Town are less
consistent & responsible for reducing the level of dissolved oxygen of the river than Above Town.
Pair Plot:

As from the above pair plot we can infer that almost Above Town and Below Town readings are
looking similar but Below Town dissolved oxygen readings are on higher side making it more
suspicion for the pollution controller inspector.

The suspicion of the pollution control inspector is valid as from the readings Below Town specimens
drawn randomly by the inspector indicates that Below Town location is more responsible for
releasing semi-treated sewage into river as compared to Above Town specimen from the location.
 x`

Question 2:

Case Snippet 2A) On a communication channel one of three sequences of letters can be

transmitted: AAAA, BBBB, CCCC. It is known that the action of noise on the receiver

decreases the probability of correct reception of a transmitted letter to 0.6. The probability

of the incorrect reception of a transmitted letter as either of the two other letters increases

to 0.2. It is assumed that the letters are distorted independently of one another. Find the

probability that

1) When AA is transmitted, AB is received on the receiver

2) When AAAA is transmitted, ABCA is received on the receiver

Answer:

Prob of incorrect reception = 1-0.6 = 0.4

Prob of one letter change to another i.e AA to AB =0.4*0.2 = 0.08

Prob of one letter change to another i.e AAAA to ABCA=0.4*0.2*0.2 =0.016

Question 3:
Case Snippet 3A) In a greenhouse experiment four different fertilizers are applied to two

plant species and the height of the species is noted. The objective is to examine whether there is any
effect of the fertilizers. The following ANOVA table is constructed. You need to

provide the missing values.

Source of Degrees Sum of Mean F-value

Variation of Squares Squares
Freedom
Species 745.4375
Fertilizers
Species X 50.5842
Fertilizer
Error 135.97
Total 47 1168.73

What is your final conclusion?

Answer:

No of Fertilizers = 4

No of Plant Species = 2

Source of Degrees Sum of Mean F-value

Variation of Squares Squares
Freedom
Species 1 745.4375 745.4375 223.1898919886
Fertilizers 3 6 2 0.5988158417
Species X 3 50.5842
Fertilizer
Error 40 135.97 3.339925
Total 47 1168.73