Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Item Analysis (GRP 3&7)
Item Analysis (GRP 3&7)
TEST
ITEMS CONDE PAILAS DE GUZMAN RIGOR DONA PRIMO PANTASAN SALVADOR CABANILLA
1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 0 0
2 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0
3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0
4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
5 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
6 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0
7 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 0
8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
13 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1
14 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
15 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
16 1 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1
17 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
18 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1
19 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
20 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1
SCORE 19 16 16 15 15 15 13 13 12
STUDENTS
7.02 8
GROUP
DIFFICULTY INDEX DISCRIMINATION INDEX
UPPER LOWER VALUE INTERPRETATION REMARKS VALUES
5 4 0.35 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.04
4 2 0.23 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.08
4 2 0.23 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.08
8 6 0.54 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.08
4 1 0.19 VERY DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.12
5 4 0.35 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.04
6 6 0.46 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.00
0 1 0.04 VERY DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE -0.04
8 4 0.46 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.15
8 2 0.38 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.23
8 7 0.58 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.04
8 2 0.38 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.23
7 2 0.35 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.19
8 2 0.38 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.23
5 1 0.23 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.15
6 4 0.38 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.08
8 3 0.42 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.19
7 0 0.27 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.27
8 4 0.46 AVERAGE ACCEPTABLE 0.15
5 2 0.27 DIFFICULT NOT ACCEPTABLE 0.12
FINAL
DISCRIMINATION INDEX DECISION
REMARKS
INTERPRETATION REMARKS
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE FAIR REVISE
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER NOT ACCEPTABLE POOR REJECT
NO. NAME(SURNAME, FIRST NAME, MIDDLE NAME YEAR AND SECTION SCORE
1 CONDE, CHRISTINE JOY FELIPE. 2ND YEAR / B ###
2 PAILAS, ERICA COLOMA. 2ND YEAR / B ###
3 DE GUZMAN, GERALDINE SALAMACA. 2ND YEAR / B ###
4 RIGOR, LYKA 2ND YEAR / B ###
5 DONA, PAULINE CASTRO. 2ND YEAR / B ###
6 PRIMO, MICHELLE PISCO. 2ND YEAR / B ###
7 PANTASAN, NURDITA ISMAEL. 2ND YEAR / B ###
8 SALVADOR, JENELYN DIASCAN 2ND YEAR / B ###
9 CABANILLA, STEPHANIE 2ND YEAR / B ###
10 BUMAGAT, ROSELLE 2ND YEAR / B ###
11 GROMUALDO, KYLA MAE 2ND YEAR / B ###
12 GUEVARRA, AKINA LEE 2ND YEAR / B ###
13 TIOPIANCO, JANNAH 2ND YEAR / B ###
14 PRONTO, BERNADETTE 2ND YEAR / B ###
15 DELOS REYES, JENALYN 2ND YEAR / B ###
16 GARDOCE, MARK IAN 2ND YEAR / B ###
17 TUCKER, ROSETE 2ND YEAR / B ###
18 AGUILAR, JOHN PAOLO BARCELONA. 2ND YEAR / B ###
19 JOSE, RAZZLE JOY GREEN. 2ND YEAR / B ###
20 ADRIOSULA, ALEXIS 2ND YEAR / B ###
21 BARCELONA, NICEL CRUZ. 2ND YEAR / B ###
22 REGLOS, DONDON 2ND YEAR / B ###
23 PAROCHA, IAN JERICHO 2ND YEAR / B ###
24 ESTEBAN, BLESS JILL 2ND YEAR / B ###
25 VALEROSO, ANDREA PHINE. 2ND YEAR / B ###
26 ESTEBAN, EPHRAIM ARON MINA. 2ND YEAR / B ###
DIFFICULTY INDEX DISCRIMINATION INDE
0.81-1.00 VERY EASY 0.61-1.00
0.61-.80 EASY 0.41-0.60
0.41-0.60 AVERAGE 0.20-0.40
0.21-0.40 DIFFICULT 0.01-0.19
0.00-0.20 VERY DIFFICULT 0
(-1) TO -0.01
ACCEPTABLE IS FROM
0.41-0.60
ACCEPTABLE IS FROM 0.20-1
DISCRIMINATION INDEX
VERY HIGH DISCRIMINATING POWER
MODERATELY DISCRIMINATING POWER
LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER
VERY LOW DISCRIMINATING POWER
NO DISCRIMINATING POWER
QUESTIONABLE ITEM