Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ucsd Soci 159 Spring 22 Syllabus
Ucsd Soci 159 Spring 22 Syllabus
This course explores how we view our courts and judicial system, often based on, or
affected by popular culture. Here, our focus will be on film or movies as a medium of
popular culture. In other words, we will discuss specific judicial and legal concepts through
the prism of movies in popular culture. We will challenge our beliefs and gain an
appreciation for how judges act and react in their effort to ensure due process and a fair
administration of justice. And as a judicial officer I hope to bring you some unique insight
into the courts and the judicial process...
General information: Your instructor is The Honorable Judge Brad A. Weinreb, San
Diego Superior Court. My Office hours are by appointment. You may reach me via email
at bweinreb@ucsd.edu. You may also call my courtroom department D22 and leave a
message with my courtroom clerk, at 760-201-8022. I will try to respond to your emails as
quickly as I can but keep in mind I may be presiding (on the bench) so it may not be until
that evening. Also, students sometimes send me messages via Canvas, but I don't see them
until I log in. To ensure I see the email promptly, send it directly to my email address.
The assigned book is Asimow & Mader, Law and Popular Culture—A Course
Book (second edition 2013) (“LPC”). It is available in the bookstore before school begins.
Grading structure: The course is all remote and is split into a hybrid mode. There will be
asynchronous requirements (on your own time but before our scheduled class) and then a
REMOTE live synchronous class where we will discuss what you did in your
assignment. The course does not have a mid-term; instead, there are weekly
graded assignments as well as a final paper. The basic structure is as follows:
These movies are available for free through UCSD, but you may find it easier to watch
them on your own through streaming or on-demand services (like Netflix, Amazon Prime
etc). To find the sources to contact to stream particular movies,
try www.JustWatch.com (Links to an external site.).
Grading. As noted above, grades will be based on pre-class responses (20%), class
discussion and post-class discussion board responses (40%), and your final paper (40%).
Final paper. The final paper is a maximum 1500 words (6-page) essay on any subject of
your choosing relating to both law (broadly defined) and popular culture (broadly defined
and not limited to movies or TV). You need to start thinking about the subject of the paper
now. Additional requirements: Page-limit excludes cover page/title and bibliography in
either MLA or APA format. The essay should be double-spaced with Times New Roman
font size 12. The margins should be 1-inch.
Potential Issues discussed in Paper. You can use one or more subject/issue of your choice
related to our course content. Perhaps you’ll focus on one TV show or movie, or a series or
several for comparison or contrast. Below are issues you might also consider as a topic.
Many issues will also be addressed in our seminar and could be of interest to you.
1. Law and popular culture. What does this particular work teach us about law, lawyers,
the legal system, ethics, or justice? What does it teach the general public? How accurate
and fair is the show or film's account in reflecting the reality of law and lawyers?
2. Public policy and legal theory. What specific issues of legal or ethical policy emerge from
the show or film? Many films dwell on the difference between "justice" and "law." Do you
see a gulf between the two? If so, how did you come up with your version of
"justice?" And what's wrong with "law" if it didn't produce "justice?"
3. Messages from the writer/director? What can we learn about cultural or political issues
and attitudes at the time the show or film was made (as distinguished from the time in
which the story is set)? In other words, what kind of message are the writer and director
trying to send to viewers beyond just entertaining them? Do you accept that message or
disagree with it?
4. Learning about lawyers. Treating the show or film as an account of what lawyers or
judges do and believe, what can we learn about such questions as: How do lawyers interact
with other lawyers or judges or with non-lawyers such as clients, staff, friends or family
members? What is the impact of judges’ or lawyers' work on their personal lives and
relationships? What professional roles do lawyers play other than in litigation and how
well do they play these roles? What can we learn about how lawyers feel about what they
do and how these feelings influence their public actions and their private lives? Do these
representations align with what real lawyers do and believe?
5. Law genre. There is a genre of law films and television shows, meaning a set of audience
expectations or stock stories, in the same sense that there is a western or detective or
horror film genre. Can we identify patterns of the genre? Does this movie or television
show conform to the limitations of the genre or does it transcend them?
7. Personal reaction. Treat the show or film as a form of experiential learning as if you
were a participant in the events depicted in the film. How did you react to the film? What
emotions did it stir? How would you like to have been one of the lawyers, law students,
clients, jurors, or the judge involved in this film? Would you have acted differently than
they did? Do you see the judges and lawyers involved as role models or just the opposite?
Tentative class schedule. This is a tentative organization of the sessions with assigned
readings. Please check Canvas assignments and discussion links for specific information.
*Class 1. Introduction to law and popular culture. We will also conduct an overview on
courts and the judicial system. Assignment: Read LPC Preface (pp. xxi – xxiv) & Chapter 1
& pp. 124-127. Submit pre-class response. There is no post-class discussion board.
*Class 2. Overview of the adversary system and the trial genre. Assignment:
Watch Anatomy of a Murder. Read LPC Chapter 2. Watch Power-point: Criminal
Process. Submit pre-class assignment response. Post-class discussion board.
*Class 3. Good Lawyers/Bad Lawyers. Assignment: Watch To Kill a Mockingbird and The
Verdict. Read LPC: Chapter 4 and LPC ¶3.08.1. Submit pre-class assignment response.
Post-class discussion board.
*Class 4. Criminal justice system. Assignment: Watch Lincoln Lawyer. Read LPC chapter
8 (but not pp. 153-58) and ¶¶7.01and 7.02 (pp. 124-132). Watch Criminal Trial Power-
point, Plea Bargain Power-point. Submit pre-class response. Post-class discussion board.
*Class 5. Judicial ethics, unique courtroom issues and addressing bias. Assignment: Watch
Courtroom Ethics Power-point, Elder Abuse Power-point. Implicit Bias Video. Submit
pre-class assignment response. Post-class discussion board.
*Class 6. The Jury. Assignment: Watch 12 Angry Men. Read LPC ch 9. Watch The Jury
power-point. Submit pre-class response. Post-class discussion board.
*Class 7. The Civil Justice system. Assignment: Watch A Civil Action. Read LPC ch. 12
(but not pp. 241-49). Watch Civil Procedure Power-point. Submit pre-class
response. Post-class discussion board.
*Class 8. Civil Rights. Assignment. Watch Philadelphia. Read LPC ch. 13 and
¶10.06. Watch Civil Rights Power-point. Submit pre-class response. Post-class discussion
board.
*Class 9. Family Law. Assignment: Watch Kramer vs. Kramer. Read LPC
ch.14. Watch Child Custody and DVPA Power-points. Submit pre-class response. Post-
class discussion board.
*Class 10. Final Class Wrap-up. Final Papers support class. Submit pre-class response. No
post-class discussion board.
*Final Papers due by 11:59pm on June 7th. Submit on Canvas. Turnitin.com academic
integrity software will be used.