Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s.

2022

Republic of the Philippines

Department of Education
Cordillera Administrative Region
SCHOOLS DIVISION OFFICE OF ABRA

OFFICE PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM FOR SCHOOL HEADS

SY 2021-2022

Name of Employee: _______________________________ Name of Rater: SAMUEL T. EGSAEN JR., EdD

Position: ________________________________________ Position: Asst. Schools Division Superintendent
School/Division: __________________________________ Date: ________________________________
Rating Period: __________________________________________

TO BE FILLED DURING
TO BE FILLED DURING PLANNING
EVALUATION
Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RATING
MFO’S KRA’S OBJECTIVES TIMELINE per SCORE
Objective Quality Efficiency Timeliness Q E T AVE.
KRA 1: School 1. Implemented the September 13 5 - 100% 5 - 100% utilization 5 - School AIP
Leadership School Annual 2021-June implementation of of funds allocated cum SLCOP and
Management Implementation Plan 2022 PAPs in the AIP cum per PPAs other
and (AIP) cum School SLCOP and other supplementary
Operations Learning Continuity supplementary plans 4 - 90% to 99% plans were
Plan (SLCOP) and utilization of funds implemented
(30) other supplementary 4 - 90% to 99% allocated within the
plans implementation of prescribed
PAPs in the AIP cum 3 - 80% to 89% date/timeline
SLCOP and other utilization of funds
supplementary plans allocated 4 - School AIP
1|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
cum SLCOP and
3 - 80% to 89% 2 - 70% to 79% other
implementation of utilization of funds supplementary
PAPs in the AIP cum allocated plans were
SLCOP and other implemented after
supplementary plans 1 - 69% and below one (1) week of
implementation of the prescribed
2 - 70% to 79% PAPs in the AIP date
implementation of cum SLCOP and
PAPs in the AIP cum other 3 - School AIP
SLCOP and other supplementary cum SLCOP and
supplementary plans plans other
supplementary
1 - 69% and below plans were
implementation of implemented after
PAPs in the AIP cum two (2) weeks of
SLCOP and other the prescribed
supplementary plans date

2 - School AIP
cum SLCOP and
other
supplementary
plans were
implemented after
three (3) weeks of
the prescribed
date

1 - School AIP
cum SLCOP and
other
supplementary
plans were
implemented after
2|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
2. Developed the SIP July
2022-25 with 2022-
23 Annual
Implementation Plan
(AIP) cum School
Learning Continuity
Plan (SLCOP) and
other supplementary
Plans
3|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
one (1) month of
the prescribed
date
7 5- 100% of PPAs are 5- Submit draft
reflected in the AIP copy of SIP with
cum SCLOP & 2022-23
Supplementary plans AIP,WFP,PPMP
is submitted on
4- 90 to 99% of PPAs the 1st week of
are reflected in the July 2022 or
AIP cum SCLOP & earlier
Supplementary plans 4- Submit draft
copy of SIP with
3-80 to 89 % of PPAs 2022-23
are reflected in the AIP,WFP,PPMP
AIP cum SCLOP & on the 2nd week
Supplementary plans of July 2022(11-
15)
2- 70% 79 of PPAs 3- Submit draft
are reflected in the copy of SIP with
AIP cum SCLOP & 2022-23
Supplementary plans AIP,WFP.PPMP
on the 3rd week
1- 69 % or below of of July 2022(18-
the PPAs are 220.
reflected in the AIP 2- Submit draft
cum SCLOP & copy of SIP with
Supplementary plans 2022-23 AIP,
WFP, PPMP on
Indicators: the 4rd week of
- Compliant with the July 2022 (25-29).
prescribed format 1- Submitted draft
- Compliant with copy of SIP with
complete signature of 2022-23
SIP Planning Team AIP,WFP, PPMP
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
- SIP/AIP was
reviewed by the
Division Appraisal
Committee
on August 2022
- Presence of
onwards.
components per
chapter
- Compliant with
complete annexes
3. Conducted 10 Research
research and 1. Research Proposal
implemented was evaluated by the
innovative practices SDRC
improving the delivery 2. Copy of Approved
of basic education Research Proposal
services 3. Certificate of
Completion of
Research Final
Report
4. Certification that
research results was
disseminated in the
school/district/division
5. Presented
research to
regional/division
research conferences
or district
conferences

Innovation
1. Copy of Innovation
was
presented/received at
the Division Office
4|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
2. Innovation was
assessed, evaluated
and validated
3. Certificate of
Recognition of
approved innovation
4. Certification that
approved innovation
was presented
5. Certification that
innovation was
adopted by other
teachers/schools/
community/division

Indicators:
5 – All indicators
were met
4 – 4 indicators were
met
3 – 3 indicators were
met
2 – 2 indicators were
met
1 – 1 indicator was
met
KRA 2: 1. Assisted teachers Sept.”21- 10 5- Assisted in the
Instructional in the review, June ‘22 review and
Leadership contextualization, and development of
implementation of contextualized
(40) learning standards to learning materials
75-80% (total no. of
make the curriculum
teachers);
relevant to the reproduced and
learners utilized 90-100% of
(3.1.2) the SLMs as
5|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
evidenced by the
inventory ,
utilization and
certification reports

4- Assisted in the
review and
development of
contextualized
learning materials
70-74% (total no. of
teachers);
reproduced and
utilized 80-89% of
the SLMs as
evidenced by the
inventory ,
utilization and
certification reports

3- Assisted in the
review and
development of
contextualized
learning materials
65-69 % (total no.
of teachers);
reproduced and
utilized 70-79% of
the SLMs as
evidenced by the
inventory ,
utilization and
certification reports

2- Assisted in the
review and
development of
6|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
contextualized
learning materials
60-64 % (total no.
of teachers);
reproduced and
utilized 60-69% of
the SLMs as
evidenced by the
inventory ,
utilization and
certification reports

1- Assisted in the
review and
development of
contextualized
learning materials
55-60 % (total no.
of teachers);
reproduced and
utilized 50-59% of
the SLMs as
evidenced by the
inventory ,
utilization and
certification reports

2.Provided technical Sept”21- 10 5- Observed ,

assistance to June’22 monitored and
teachers on teaching coached 90-100% of
standards and the total number of
pedagogies, within teachers
and across learning
areas to improve their 4- Observed,
teaching practice monitored and

7|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
(3.3.2) coached 80-89% of
the total number of
teachers

3- Observed,
monitored and
coached 70-79% of
the total number of
teachers

2- Observed,
monitored and
coached 60-69% of
the total number of
teachers

1- Observed,
monitored and
coached 50-59% of
the total number of
teachers

3. Provide technical Sept”21- 10 1- Provided TA to

assistance to June”22 teachers in
teachers in using constructing and
learning assessment implementing at least
tools, strategies and 4 written works with
results consistent TOS
with curriculum
requirements to 2- Provided TA to
ensure accountability teachers in
in achieving higher constructing and
learning outcomes implementing at least
4 Performance Tasks
with Rubrics

8|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022

3- Provided TA to
teachers in identifying
three least learned
competencies across
the grade levels and
learning areas

4- Provided TA to
teachers in acquiring
data of MPS, Final
Grades across the
quarters, grade levels
and learning areas

5- Provided TA to
teachers in finalizing
and submitting
quarterly on time
the assessment
reports of learners

5- all indicators met

4- 4 indicators
3-3 indicators met 2-
2 indicators me 1- 1
indicator met
4. Utilize learning Sept “21- 10 1- Analyzed the
outcomes in June “22 assessment result
developing data- of learners across
based interventions the grade levels in
to maintain learner all learning areas
achievement and
attain other 2. Presented the
performance result and analysis
indicators in a LAC session,

9|OPCRF SY 2021-2022
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
conference or
meeting

3. Prepared an
intervention plan to
address the
learning gaps

4. Based on the
intervention plan,
prepared
innovation/research
proposals or
remediation
activities

5. Aligned to the
Division Memo ,
acquired certificate
of recognition for
innovation /
certificate of
completion for
research and other
intervention
activities as proofs
of implementation.

5- all indicators met

4- 4 indicators met
3-3 indicators met
2- 2 indicators met
1- 1 indicator met
KRA 3: Human 1. Crafted and October 6 5- 96-100% of the 5- 100% of the 5- L and D Plan
Resource implemented 2021-July activities in the L and allocated budget implemented by
Development Learning 2022 D Plan were was utilized the 2nd week of
and Developmental Plan implemented June 2022
4-95-99%of the
10 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
Management based on IPDPs/DPs 4- 91%-95% of the allocated budget 4- L and D Plan
activities in the L and was utilized implemented by
(12 pts.) D Plan were the 3rd week of
implemented 3-90-94%of the June 2022
allocated budget
3- 86%-90% of the was utilized 3- L and D Plan
activities in the L and implemented by
D Plan were 2-85-89%of the the 4th week of
implemented allocated budget June 2022
was utilized
2- 81%-85% of the 2- L and D Plan
activities in the L and 1-84% and below of implemented by
D Plan were the allocated the 1st week of
implemented budget was utilized July 2022

1- 80% and below of 1- L and D Plan

the activities in the L implemented later
and D Plan were than 2nd week of
implemented July
2. Evaluated the October 3 5 -- 100% of the 5- Performance
performance of 2021-July teachers and other management
teachers and other 2022 school based cycle conducted 2
school personnel personnel have days before the
undergone the scheduled date
performance
management cycle 4- Performance
management
4-91%-95% of the cycle conducted 1
teachers and other day before the
school based scheduled date
personnel have
undergone the 3- Performance
performance management
management cycle cycle conducted
at the scheduled

11 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
3- 86%-85% of the date
teachers and other
school based 2- Performance
personnel have management
undergone the cycle conducted 1
performance day after the
management cycle scheduled date

2- 81%-85% of the 1- Performance

teachers and other management
school based cycle conducted 2
personnel have days after the
undergone the scheduled date
performance
management cycle

1- 80% and below of

the teachers and
other school based
personnel have
undergone the
performance
management cycle
3. Established a October 3 5- Established a 5- 100% of the 5- R and R and
functional school 2021-July functional school allocated budget personnel
PRAISE committee 2022 PRAISE committee was utilized wellness program
and crafted and and implemented implemented by
implemented 96%-100% of the R 4-95-99%of the the 2nd week of
Rewards and and R and personnel allocated budget June 2022
Recognition and wellness program was utilized
personnel wellness implemented 4- R and R and
program 3-90-94%of the personnel
4- Established a allocated budget wellness program
functional school was utilized implemented by
PRAISE committee the 3rd week of
12 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
and implemented 2-85-89%of the June 2022
91%-95% of the R allocated budget 3- R and R and
and R and personnel was utilized personnel
wellness program wellness program
implemented 1-84% and below of implemented by
the allocated the 4th week of
3- Established a budget was utilized June 2022
functional school
PRAISE committee 2- R and R and
and implemented personnel
86%-90% of the R wellness program
and R and personnel implemented by
wellness program the 1st week of
implemented July 2022

2- Established a 1- R and R and

functional school personnel
PRAISE committee wellness program
and implemented implemented
81%-85% of the R beyond 2nd week
and R and personnel of July 2022
wellness program
implemented

1- Established a
functional school
PRAISE committee
and implemented
80% and below of the
R and R and
personnel program
implemented
KRA 4: Improved 4 5. 96-100% 5- No late
Resource disbursement rate of disbursement rate of liquidation. (every
Management school's MOOE fund School's MOOE fund 28th day of the
13 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
per month month)
(8)
4. 91-95% 4- 1 month late of
disbursement rate of liquidation (every
School's MOOE fund 28th day of the
per month month)

3. 86-90% 3- 2 months late

disbursement rate of of liquidation
School's MOOE fund (every 28th day of
per month the month)

2. 76-85% 2- 3 months late

disbursement rate of of liquidation
School's MOOE fund (every 28th day of
per month the month)

1. 80% disbursement 1- 5 months

rate of School's late of
MOOE fund per liquidation
month (every
28th day
of the
month)

2.Updated PPEI of 4 5 - 100% updated 5 - Updated

the school Subsidiary Ledger of subsidiary ledger
the school PPEI of the school
4 - 95% - 99% PPEI by
updated subsidiary December 2021
ledger of the school 4- Updated
ppei subsidiary of the

14 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
3 - 90% - 94% school PPEI by
updated Subsidiary January 2022
ledger of the school 3 - Updated
ppei subsidiary ledger
2 - 85% - 89% of the school
updated subsidiary PPEI by February
ledger of the school 2022
ppei 2- Updated
1 - 84% and below subsidiary ledger
updated subsidiary of the school
ledger of the school PPEI by March
ppei 2022
1- Updated
subsidiary ledger
of the school
PPEI by April
2022
KRA 5: 1. Expanded 5 5 - 5 MOA/MOU Forged 21 days or
Partnership institutionalized 4 - 4 MOA/MOU more before
and Linkages partnership and 3 - 3 MOA/MOU implementation of
linkages with various 2 - 2 MOA/MOU the PPAs
(10) stakeholders 1 – 1 MOA/MOU Forged 16 to 20
days before
implementation of
the PPAs
Forged 11 to 15
days before
implementation of
the PPAs
Forged 6-10 days
before
implementation of
the PPAs
Forged 1 day to 5
days before
15 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
implementation of
the PPAs
2) Utilized 5 5 - 10 articles
communication published/posted
platforms in and/or advocacy
communicating with materials at School
teachers, learners, DepEd Tayo Page
parents and other
stakeholders 4 - 8 articles
published/posted
and/or advocacy
materials at School
DepEd Tayo Page

3 - 6 articles
published/posted
and/or advocacy
materials at School
DepEd Tayo Page

2 - 4 articles
published/posted
and/or advocacy
materials at School
DepEd Tayo Page

1 - 2 articles
published/posted
and/or advocacy
materials at School
DepEd Tayo Page

RATEE: REVIEWED AND RATED BY: APPROVED BY

16 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2
Enclosure 1 DM No. _______, s. 2022
_________________________________ SAMUEL T. EGSAEN JR., EdD BENILDA M. DAYTACA, EdD, CESO V
_________________________________ Assistant Schools Division Superintendent Schools Division Superintendent
Date: __________________________ Date: __________________________ Date: _______________________

17 | O P C R F S Y 2 0 2 1 - 2 0 2 2