INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM (IPCRF) for Teachers I-III

Name of Employee KAREN D. DUMAYAS Name of Rater MARYPER B. YABO

Position Teacher I Position Master Teacher I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division DepEd Zamboanga del Sur Date of Review June 15, 2020
Rating Period APRIL 201 9– MARCH 2020
To be filled out during planning To be filled during evaluation

Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING

per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content Showed knowledge of Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge Showed knowledge of
Knowledge content and its of content and its of content and its of content and its content and its
and integration within and integration within and integration within and integration within integration within and
Basic Pedagogy across subject areas across subject areas across subject areas and across subject No acceptable across subject areas
as shown in MOV 1
Educatio as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 areas as shown in
Quality evidence was with a rating of 7
n with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 MOV 1 with a rating shown
Service of 4
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within
June 2018- Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson Submitted at least 4
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
March 2019 lessons as evidenced as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by lessons as evidenced
curriculum
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 from MOV 1 from MOV 1 from by MOV 1 and
teaching
supported by any 1 of
areas. supported by any 1 of colleagues and colleagues and colleagues and No acceptable
the other MOV given
Efficiency the other MOV given supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 evidence was
of the other MOV of the other MOV of the other MOV shown
given given given

Timeliness
Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using Facilitated using No acceptable Facilitated using
different teaching different teaching different teaching different teaching evidence was different teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading, promote reading,
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or
numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as numeracy skills as
Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 a rating of 6

2. Used a range of
teaching
strategies that
June 2018-
enhance learner 7.50% 4 4 4 0.3
March 2019
achievement in
literacy and
numeracy skills.
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
2. Used a range of
per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs teaching
OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
strategies that
June 2018- 5 4 3 2 1
enhance learner 7.50% 4 4 4 0.3
March 2019
1. Content achievement in Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 No acceptable Submitted at least 2
Knowledge literacy and learnercentered learnercentered learnercentered evidence was learnercentered
Submitted at least 1 lessons as evidently
and numeracy skills. lessons as evidently lessons as evidently lessons as evidently show
learnercentered shown in MOV 1 and
Pedagogy shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and shown in MOV 1 and
lessons as supported by any 1 of
supported by any 1 of supported by any 1 supported by any 1 evidently shown in the other MOV given
Efficiency the other MOV given of the other MOV of the other MOV
MOV 1 and
given given supported by any 1
1. Applied
of the other MOV
knowledge of
given
content within
June 2018-
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
March 2019
curriculum Timeliness
teaching
Used different Used different Used different Used different No acceptable Used different
areas.
teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies teaching strategies evidence was teaching strategies
that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical that develop critical shown that develop critical
and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative thinking and creative and creative thinking
and/or other HOTS as and/or other HOTS and/or other HOTS thinking and/or and/or other HOTS
Quality shown in MOV 1 with as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 other HOTS as as shown in MOV 1
a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 6
3. Applied a range
with a rating of 4
of teaching
strategies to
develop critical
June 2018-
and creative 7.50% 4 4 4 0.3
March 2019
thinking, as well
as other
Submitted 3 lessons Submitted 2 lessons Submitted 1 lesson Submitted 3 lessons
higherorder Submitted 4 or more
thinking skills as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown as evidently shown
lessons as evidently No acceptable
in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and
Efficiency shown in MOV 1 and evidence was
supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any of supported by any 1
supported by any 1 of shown
of the other given of the other given the other given of the other given
the other given MOV
MOV MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom Used classroom No acceptable Used classroom
management management management management evidence was management
strategies that engage strategies that strategies that strategies that shown strategies that
4. Managed
learners in activities/ engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in engage learners in
classroom
Quality tasks as shown in activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as activities/ tasks as
structure to
MOV 1 with a rating of shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 shown in MOV 1 with
engage learners,
7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 a rating of 7
individually or in
groups, in
meaningful June 2018-
7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
exploration, March 2019
discovery and Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 3 Submitted at least 2 Submitted at least 1 Submitted at least 3
hands-on lessons supported by lessons supported by lessons supported by lessons supported No acceptable lessons supported by
activities within a Efficiency MOV 1 and any 1 of MOV 1 and any 1 of MOV 1 and any 1 of by MOV 1 and any evidence was MOV 1 and any 1 of
range of physical the other acceptable the other acceptable the other acceptable 1 of the other shown the other acceptable
learning MOV MOV MOV acceptable MOV MOV
environments.

Timeliness
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No acceptable Applied teacher
Knowledge management management management management evidence was management
and strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner strategies of learner shown strategies of learner
Pedagogy behavior that promote behavior that behavior that behavior that behavior that
positive and non- promote positive promote positive promote positive promote positive
violent discipline as and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent and non-violent
Quality shown in MOV discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown discipline as shown
1. Applied submitted with a in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted in MOV submitted
knowledge
5. Managed of rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4 with a rating of 7
content
learner within
behavior June 2018-
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
constructively by March 2019
curriculum
applying positive
teaching June 2018-
and non-violent 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
areas. March 2019
discipline to
Basic 2. Learning ensure
Educatio Environment learningfocused
n and Diversity environments Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4 Submitted at least 4
Submitted at least 4
Service of Learners of the given of the given of the given No acceptable of the given
of the given strategies
Efficiency strategies as strategies as strategies as evidence was strategies as
as observed in at
observed in at least 3 observed in at least 2 observed in at least shown observed in at least 4
least 4 lessons
lessons lessons 1 lessons lessons

Timeliness

Applied differentiated
teaching strategies to
address learner Applied
Applied differentiated Applied differentiated Applied differentiated
diversity as shown in differentiated
teaching strategies to teaching strategies to teaching strategies to
MOV 1 with a rating of teaching strategies No acceptable
address learner address learner address learner
Quality 7 to address learner evidence
diversity as shown in diversity as shown in diversity as shown in
diversity as shown shown MOV 1 with a rating of
MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating
6. Used in MOV 1 with a 7
of 6 of 5
differentiated, rating of 4
developmentally
appropriate
learning Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No acceptable Submitted 3
June 2018- differentiated teaching differentiated differentiated differentiated evidence was differentiated
experiences to 7.50% 4 4 4 0.3
March 2019 strategies in at least teaching strategies in teaching strategies in teaching strategies shown teaching strategies in
address learners’
gender, needs, 2 lessons as at least 2 lessons at least 2 lessons in at least 1 lesson at least 2 lessons
strengths, evidenced by MOV 1 as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by as evidenced by
interests and and supported by any MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and
Efficiency 1 of the other supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1 supported by any 1
experiences.
acceptable MOV of the other of the other of the other of the other
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No acceptable Planned and
Knowledge implemented implemented implemented implemented evidence was implemented
and developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally shown developmentally
Basic Pedagogy sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced sequenced teaching
Educatio and learning process and learning process and learning process teaching and and learning process
Quality as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 as shown in MOV 1 learning process as as shown in MOV 1
n
Service 7. Planned, with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 shown in MOV 1 with a rating of 7
1. Applied
managed and with a rating of 4
knowledge of
implemented
content within
developmentally June 2018-
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
sequenced March 2019 Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 3
curriculum
teaching and June 2018- developmentally developmentally developmentally developmentally
teaching 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
learning March 2019 sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced teaching sequenced Submitted 3
areas.
processes to meet and learning process and learning process and learning process teaching and developmentally
curriculum as evidently shown in as evidently shown as evidently shown learning process as sequenced teaching
requirements and MOV 1 and supported in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and evidently shown in No acceptable and learning process
varied teaching Efficiency by any 1 of the other supported by any 1 supported by any 1 any 1 of the other evidence was as evidently shown
contexts. given MOV of the other given of the other given given MOV shown in MOV 1 and
MOV MOV supported by any 1
of the other given
MOV

Timeliness
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely participated No acceptable Frequently
participated in participated in participated in in LACs/FGDs/ evidence was participated in
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ meetings to discuss shown LACs/FGDs/
meetings to discuss meetings to discuss meetings to discuss teacher/learner meetings to discuss
Basic teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner feedback to enrich teacher/learner
Educatio 3. Curriculum feedback to enrich feedback to enrich feedback to enrich instruction as feedback to enrich
8. Participated in Quality instruction as shown instruction as shown instruction as shown shown in the MOV instruction as shown
n and Planning
collegial in the MOV submitted in the MOV in the MOV submitted in the MOV
Service
discussions that submitted submitted submitted
June 2018-
use teacher and 7.50% 4 4 4 0.3
March 2019
learner feedback
to enrich teaching
practice.
Participated in at least Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No acceptable Participated in at
4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ evidence was least 4 LACs/FGDs/
meetings as evidently meetings as meetings as meetings as shown meetings as
Efficiency
shown in any 1 of the evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in
given MOV any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given any 1 of the given
MOV MOV MOV MOV
Timeliness
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content Developed and used Developed and used Developed and used Developed and No acceptable
Knowledge varied teaching and varied teaching and varied teaching and used varied evidence was
and learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, teaching and shown
Pedagogy including ICT, to including ICT, to including ICT, to learning resources, Developed and used
address learning address learning address learning including ICT, to varied teaching and
goals as shown in goals as shown in goals as shown in address learning learning resources,
Quality MOV 1 with a rating of MOV 1 with a rating MOV 1 with a rating goals as shown in including ICT, to
address learning goals
1. Applied 7 of 6 of 5 MOV 1 with a rating
9. Selected, as shown in MOV 1
knowledge of of 4
developed,
content within
with a rating of 7
organized and June 2018-
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
used appropriate March 2019
curriculum
teaching
teachingand June 2018-
7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
learning
areas. March 2019 Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted any
resources, varied teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
including ICT, to learning resources, learning resources, learning resources, learning resource, Submitted at least 4
address learning including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as including ICT, as varied teaching and
goals. evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in evidently shown in No acceptable learning resources,
including ICT, as
Efficiency MOV 1 and supported MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the evidence was
evidently shown in
by any 1 of the supported by any 1 supported by any 1 acceptable MOV shown
MOV 1 and supported
acceptable MOV of the acceptable of the acceptable by any 1 of the
MOV MOV acceptable MOV

Timeliness
Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected, Designed, selected,
organized and used organized and used organized and used organized and used
diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic, formative diagnostic,
and summative and summative and summative formative and Designed, selected,
assessment assessment assessment summative organized and used
strategies consistent strategies consistent strategies consistent assessment diagnostic, formative
with curriculum with curriculum with curriculum strategies and summative
10. Designed, requirements as requirements as requirements as consistent with No acceptable
assessment
selected, Quality shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with shown in MOV 1 with curriculum evidence was
strategies consistent
organized and a rating of 7 a rating of 6 a rating of 5 requirements as shown
with curriculum
used diagnostic, shown in MOV 1 requirements as
formative and with a rating of 4 shown in MOV 1 with
June 2018-
summative 7.50% a rating of 6 3 4 3.5 0.2625
March 2019
assessment
strategies
consistent with
curriculum Submitted 3 varied
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 varied Submitted 2 varied Submitted 1
requirements. assessment tools as
varied assessment assessment tools as assessment tools as assessment tools
tools as evidently evidently shown in evidently shown in as evidently shown No acceptable evidently shown in any
1 of the acceptable
Efficiency shown in any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the in any of the evidence was
MOV
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV shown

Timeliness
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
5 4 3 2 1
1. Content Consistently Frequently monitored Occasionally Frequently monitored
Knowledge monitored and and evaluated monitored and Rarely monitored and evaluated
and evaluated learner learner progress and evaluated learner and evaluated learner progress and
Basic Pedagogy progress and achievement using progress and learner progress achievement using
No acceptable
Educatio 4. Assessment achievement using learner attainment achievement using and achievement learner attainment
Quality evidence was
n and Reporting learner attainment data as shown in the learner attainment using learner data as shown in the
shown
Service data as shown in the MOV submitted data as shown in the attainment data as MOV submitted
1. Applied
11. Monitored and MOV submitted MOV submitted shown in the MOV
knowledge of submitted
evaluated learner
content within
progress and June 2018-
and across 7.50% 5 4 4 4.5 0.3375
achievement March 2019
curriculum Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a
using learner No acceptable
teaching combination of at combination of at combination of at Submitted 1 combination of at
attainment data. Efficiency evidence was
areas. least 4 of the least 3 of the least 2 of the acceptable MOV least 3 of the
shown
acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
Timeliness distributed across 4 were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 3 quarters

Consistently showed Frequently showed Occasionally showed Rarely showed Frequently showed
prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear prompt and clear
communication of the communication of communication of communication of communication of
learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs, the learners’ needs,
progress and progress and progress and progress and progress and
achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key achievement to key
stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders, stakeholders,
No acceptable
including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/ including parents/
12. Quality evidence was
guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as shown guardians as guardians as shown
Communicated shown
in the MOV submitted in the MOV in the MOV shown in the MOV in the MOV
promptly and submitted submitted submitted submitted
clearly the
learners’ needs, June 2018-
7.50% 4 4 4 4 0.3
progress and March 2019
achievement to
key stakeholders,
including
parents/guardians. Submitted a
Submitted a Submitted a No acceptable Submitted a
combination of at Submitted any 1 of
Efficiency combination of 3 of combination of 2 of evidence was combination of 3 of
least 4 of the the given MOV
the acceptable MOV the acceptable MOV shown the acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV

Submitted MOV were Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV No acceptable Submitted MOV
Timeliness distributed across 4 were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was were distributed
quarters across 3 quarters across 2 quarters only 1 quarter shown across 3 quarters

Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely performed Consistently

performed various performed various performed various various related performed various
related work/activities related related work/activities that related
No acceptable
that contribute to the work/activities that work/activities that contribute to the work/activities that
Quality evidence was
teaching learning contribute to the contribute to the teaching learning contribute to the
13. Performed shown
process as shown in teaching learning teaching learning process as shown teaching learning
Basic various related
the MOV submitted process as shown in process as shown in in the MOV process as shown in
Educatio 5. Plus works/activities June 2018-
10% the MOV submitted the MOV submitted submitted the MOV submitted 5 5 5 0.5
n Factor that contribute to March 2019
Service the teaching-
 Weight PERFORMANCE INDICATOR RATING
13. Performed per ACTUAL
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE Outstanding Very Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor SCORE
Basic various related KRA QET RESULT Q E T Ave
Educatio 5. Plus works/activities June 2018- 5 4 3 2 1
10% 5 5 5 0.5
n 1. Factor
Content that contribute to March 2019
Service Knowledge the teaching-
Submitted at least 4 Submitted 3 different Submitted 2 different Submitted any 1 of No acceptable Submitted at least 4
and learning process.
Efficiency different kinds of kinds of acceptable kinds of acceptable the acceptable evidence was different kinds of
Pedagogy acceptable MOV MO MO MOV shown acceptable MOV

Timeliness
1. Applied
knowledge of
content within
June 2018- RATING FOR OVERALL ACCOMPLISHMENT Very Satisfactory 4.288
and across 7.50% 5 4 4.5 0.3375
March 2019
curriculum
ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES
teaching
areas.
RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING
4.500 – 5.000 Outstanding
3.500 – 4.499 Very Satisfactory
2.500 – 3.499 Satisfactory
1.500 – 2.499 Unsatisfactory
below 1.499 Poor

Ratee: Rater: Approving Authority:

KAREN D. DUMAYAS MARYPER B. YABO MARCIANA A. LABORTE

Teacher I Master Teacher I ESHT I
 PART II: COMPETENCIES
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES
Self-Management
1. Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development.
2. Understands personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and takes
into account personal goals and values congruent to that of the organization.
3. Displays emotional maturity and enthusiasm for and is challenged by higher goals.
4. Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt chants, checklists, etc.) to
achieve goals.
5. Sets high quality, challenging, realistic goals for self and others.
Professionalism and Ethics
1. Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms and Conduct and
Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees (RA 6713).
2. Practice ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the
impact of his/her actions and decisions.
3. Maintains a professional image: being trustworthy, regularity of attendance and
punctuality, good grooming and communication.
4. Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization’s needs.
5. Act with a sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization’s needs,
improve system and help others improve their effectiveness.
Results Focus
1. Achieves results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time.
2. Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing
organizational needs before personal needs.
3. Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating
procedures correctly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality work
in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervision required.
4. Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or
inefficiency. May focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set.
5. Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve
performance. Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost,
more efficiently, or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting
any specific goal.
Teamwork
1. Willingly does his/her share of responsibility.
2. Promotes collaboration and removes barrier to teamwork and goal accomplishment across
the organization.
5 5
3. Applies negotiation principles in arriving at win-win agreements.
4. Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions.
5. Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across organizations to accomplish
organization goals and objectives.
Service Orientation
1. Can explain and articulate organizational directions, issues and problems.
2. Takes personal responsibility for dealing with and/or correcting customer service issues and
concerns.
5
5
3. Initiates activities that promote advocacy for men and women empowerment.
4. Participates in updating office vision, mission, mandates and strategies based on DepEd
strategies and directions.
5. Develops and adopts service improvement program through simplified procedures that will
further enhance service delivery.
Innovation
1. Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective solutions. Foster new ideas,
processes and suggests better ways to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency).
2. Demonstrates an ability to think “beyond the box”. Continuously focuses on improving
personal productivity to create higher value and results.
4
5 3. Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop original ideas or solutions.
4. Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions that improve the work unit
and organization.
5. Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. Demonstrates resourcefulness and
the ability to succeed with minimal resources.
OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING 4.500
 PART III: SUMMARY OF RATINGS FOR DISCUSSION

Final Performance Results Rating Adjectival Rating

Accomplishment of KRAs and Objectives 4.288 Very Satisfactory

Name of Employee KAREN D. DUMAYAS Name of Superior MARCIANA A. LABORTE

Signature Signature

Date Date

PART IV: DEVELOPMENT PLANS

Action Plan
Strengths Development Needs Timeline Resources Needed
(Recommended
A. Functional Competencies

From KRA 1, Objective 3 From KRA 1, Objective 3

Applying new learning from Learning and Development
To apply a range of teaching strategy To apply a range of teaching strategy
attending seminars/LAC . Team. Supervisors and master
to develop critical and creative to develop critical and creative Year -round
Using feedback to try new teachers.
thinking, as well as other higher- thinking, as well as other higher-
approach to an old practice. Local Funds
orfder thinking skills orfder thinking skills

B. Core Behavioral Competencies

1. Coaching
2. Incorporating in the next In-
1. Teamwork Innovation particularly on Regular Coaching.
service training on Human Resource Team
2. Service Orientation conceptualizing "Out of the Box" In-service training in
conceptualization of innovation Development Fuinds
3. Result Focus ideas/approaches April and May
and ingenious methods and
solutions.

RATEE RATER APPROVING AUTHORITY

KAREN D. DUMAYAS MARYPER B. YABO MARCIANA A. LABORTE

Teacher I Master Teacher I ESHT II