Research Report: Summary Title ‘Conese indication of caret rescach ‘Absract Epi dense wen |. why experiment was done nodes or ended how experiment was dane comment | themainsesats ‘he principal contosions Tarot TExablish fl: Tanguage sould ees te sit ase centrality fom general tosecitic “fate caret bnowledge ‘information an eas. 2 Summaise previous reach 5. Prepare for present research “indeste bp ives gustion 4 nodes present esearch hate parposetypotesis “Methodology | Organise acerdng to ie sequence of | -ear quencing vet inthe reser “past pie tome ‘vo? (ample), when?, whee, how (procedure) Rel ‘Background inornation options) aed ens sould we Describe ble andor sap ‘monies State rel sgncant to hypothesis | - large record feu should be putin Apendin(es) ~ generally single pat ene ‘pscusion [REET PPR ripples] Tung shoul etiet he shi From specie o genet Review the most important ndings | informaion and deas , Compare to previous esearch [Noten some pos, usualy Jarge oes dissections Explain or speulte onthe ings | sepuated int Discusion’ and "Coneton' Conctuston | Identify imation ofthe epor's findings | Weatityimplicaonsgeneralisations of he study Recommend dietons for fur research tnd praccal pplication ofthe pest ‘esearch ‘Reference Lit [ALL sources ied th repo mast Be recorded inl sing the peti se “Rppendla(cesy | Copies of ny research stamens (Order may be reversed ‘Any large esrds of resus scat PyResearch Report: Summary Structure of the Research Report ‘The folowing i summary of te rine fh esac pit fr Dips Enlsh For Aen Paps. Abstract — -A summary ft wholerpom! Introduction oa Defaton oft ope Tce eo. Ae morons Nh ofthe eran on "over ale ramen s e Ste bypteis "The iret pts ia. Specie Methodology et tp by te dering Results ‘ctu ays of te dat ‘tiga ings, Conclusion/Discussion ad er ht tehypatesres neva resach Specific "Goeal "sage th the fining of Spun tot Sings "One pose conclson hat. inion of he uy imo have -proem.” Th wold bbe Inpatient the ay Gomis Recomm ——Research Report: Which Section? “The folowing eight excerpts have been taken feom a research report. Which section do you think they eome from? There are two of each fiom the following Introduction Methodology Rents Diseussion/Conclusion (As can be seen from the table, 1260 individuals answered an age question (an average of 315 per question format ‘while 64(8.8% of the sample) refused to o 80, To facilitate comparisons among the question formats, the response stributions for the three open-ended ‘questions were converted to that of the losed' ended (categorical format) ‘question. () Table | also contains the numberof study participants who were asked but refused to answer each a the four age questions (6) In catty 1982 telephone interviews were conducted with a statewide probability simple of 2083 registered voters in a ‘majoesoutbwesem sate The interviews ‘Were conducted for a state agency and dressed various voting-tlated aides ‘and opinions. (© While the results ebiained in this investigation must be evaluated relative to the population sampled, the mode of data collection employed, and sponsoring agency, comparisons between reported land actual ages fr each of the question formats studied reveled uniformly high levels of reporting accurecy. (e) Uniortanately, pechaps, the present study es not provide unequivocal evidence as ta the prefeabiity of one age question format aver anther. The decision to use a particular age question feat must ake into sccount and “balance” its response accuracy and potential refsal ate (9 a classic book on question construction, Payne (1950:125-6) implied that asking the age question wo different ways — "How old ae you?” or "What is the date of your bit?” would result in Gifferent and possibly inconsistent (One of the most frequently asked ‘questions in. public opinion polls and consumer surveys i the age. question. However, despite its wide usage, there is 4 dearth of methodological research on howe to best ak this question. (0) The interviewer then introduced himslherself and. sted who was conducting the sty and askod for the potential participant's cocperation. The ‘gestionnaire consisted 0°20 questions, ‘of which the age question was number 15