MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: JACQUELINE S. CANLAS Name of Rater: VIRGINIA F. LLEGADO

Position: TEACHER III Position: MASTER TEACHER I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: PAMPANGA Date of Review: JULY 2022
Rating Period: SEPTEMBER - JULY 2022

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. 1. Applied June 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Conte knowledge 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on nt of content and/or inter-observer
Service Knowl within and agreement form about
s edge across knowledge of content
and curriculum within and across
Pedag teaching curriculum teaching areas
ogy areas. 2. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs developed
highlighting integration of
content knowledge within
Efficiency 5 0.1875
and across subject areas
3. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration
in other subject areas
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and
across subject areas
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a June 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati range of 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on teaching and/or inter-observer
Service strategies agreement form about
s that teaching strategies that
enhance enhance learner
learner achievement in literacy
achieveme and numeracy skills
nt in 2. Lesson plans/modified
literacy and DLLs used in teaching
numeracy highlighting learner-
skills. centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills Efficiency 4 0.15
3. Instructional materials
highlighting learner-
centered strategies that
promote literacy and/or
numeracy skills
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
teaching
5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 3. Applied June 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati a range of 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on teaching and/or inter-observer
Service strategies agreement form about
s to develop teaching strategies to
critical and develop critical and
creative creative thinking, as well
thinking, as as other higher-order
well as thinking skills
other 2. Lesson plans/modified
higher- DLLs used in teaching
order highlighting different
thinking teaching strategies that
skills. develop critical and
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
creative thinking and/or Efficiency 5 0.1875
other HOTS
3. Instructional materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and
creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
4. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
5. Results of assessment Timeliness
used in teaching
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 2. 4. June 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Learni Managed 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on ng classroom and/or inter-observer
Service Enviro structure to agreement form about
s nment engage managing classroom
and learners, structure that engages
Divers individually learners in various
ity of or in activities Efficiency 4 0.1875
Learn groups, in 2. Lesson plans/modified
ers meaningful DLLs highlighting
exploration, various classroom
discovery management strategies
and hands- that engage learners in
on activities activities/tasks in
within a different physical
range of learning environments Timeliness
physical 3. Others (Please specify
learning and provide annotations)
environmen
ts.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 5. June Classroom observation tool Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Managed 2022 (COT) rating sheet and/or
on learner inter-observer agreement
Service behavior form about teacher
s constructiv management of learner
ely by behavior using the following
applying strategies:
positive 1. Providing motivation
and non- 2. Praising the Efficiency 5 0.1875
violent learners/Giving positive
discipline to feedback
ensure 3. Setting house
learning- rules/guidelines
focused 4. Ensuring learners’ active
environmen participation
ts. 5. Allowing learners to
express their
ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal
opportunities to learners
7. Encouraging learners to Timeliness
ask questions
8. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used June 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati differentiate 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on d, and/or inter-observer
Service developme agreement form about
s ntally using differentiated,
appropriate developmentally
learning appropriate learning
experience experiences
s to 2. Lesson plans/modified
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
address DLLs developed Efficiency 5 0.1875
learners’ highlighting
gender, differentiation in content,
needs, product, process,
strengths, learning environment or
interests others according to
and learners’ gender, needs,
experience strengths, interests and
s. experiences
3. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process,
learning environment or
others according to Timeliness
learners’ gender, needs,
strengths, interests and
experiences
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 3. 7. Planned, June 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Curric managed 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on ulum and and/or inter-observer
Service and implemente agreement form about
s Planni d using developmentally
ng developme sequenced teaching and
ntally learning process
sequenced 2. Lesson plans/modified
teaching DLLs highlighting
and developmentally
learning sequenced instruction
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
processes that meet curriculum Efficiency 5 0.1875
to meet goals and varied
curriculum teaching contexts
requiremen 3. Instructional materials
ts and used to implement
varied developmentally
teaching sequenced teaching and
contexts. learning process to meet
curriculum requirements
and varied teaching
contexts
4. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
8. June 1. Personal notes of Quality 5 0.1875
Participate 2022 teachers on
d in LACs/FGDs/meetings
collegial with proof of attendance
discussions 2. Minutes of LAC/FGD
that use sessions on use of
teacher teacher and learner Efficiency 5 0.1875
and learner feedback to enrich
feedback to teaching practice with
enrich proof of attendance
teaching 3. Others (Please specify
practice. and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 9. June 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Selected, 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on developed, and/or inter-observer
Service organized agreement form about
s and used using appropriate
appropriate teaching and learning
teaching resources, including ICT
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
and Examples: Efficiency 5 0.1875
learning  Activity sheets/task
resources, sheets/work sheets
including  PowerPoint
ICT, to presentations
address  Video clips
learning  Module
goals.  SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
2. Lesson plans/modified Timeliness
DLLs with appropriate
instructional materials
appended
3. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 4. 10. June 22.5% 1. Classroom observation Quality 5 0.1875
Educati Asses Designed, 2022 tool (COT) rating sheet
on sment selected, and/or inter-observer
Service and organized agreement form about
s Repor and used using diagnostic,
ting diagnostic, formative and summative
formative assessment strategies
and 2. Prepared lesson
summative plans/modified DLLs
assessmen highlighting appropriate
t strategies use of formative
consistent assessment strategies
with 3. Developed diagnostic
curriculum tests: (a) with TOS
requiremen reviewed by superior; (b)
ts. with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed summative
tests: (a) with TOS
reviewed by superior; (b)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
with sample Efficiency 5 0.1875
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
5. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample
accomplished rubrics
6. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

Timeliness
Basic 11. June 1. Compilation of a learner’s Quality 5 0.125
Educati Monitored 2022 written work with
on and summary of results and
Service evaluated with signature of parents
s learner 2. Formative/summative
progress assessment tools with
and TOS and frequency of Efficiency 4 0.1
achieveme errors with identified least
nt using mastered skills
learner 3. Class records/grading
attainment sheets
data. 4. Lesson plans/modified
DLLs showing index of Timeliness 4 0.1
mastery
5. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)
Basic 12. June 1. At least 3 samples of Quality 5 0.125
Educati Communic 2022 corrected test papers of
on ated the same 3 learners in
Service promptly the same learning area
s and clearly with parents’ or
the guardians’ signature and
learners’
date of receipt
needs,
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
progress 2. Minutes of PTA meetings Efficiency 4 0.1
and or Parent-Teacher
achieveme conferences in all
nt to key quarters with proof of
stakeholder parent’s/guardian’s
s, including attendance
parents/gu
3. Report cards with
ardians.
parent’s or guardian’s
signature in all quarters
supported by minutes of
meeting Timeliness 5 0.125
4. Communication with
parents/guardians using
various modalities
5. Anecdotal record showing
entries per quarter
6. Other documents
showing learner needs,
progress and
achievement submitted to
other stakeholders

Basic 5. 13. June 10% 1. Certificate of Recognition Quality 2 0.1

Educati Plus Performed 2022 or Participation
on Factor various 2. Certificate of Training
Service related 3. Certificate of
s works/activi Speakership
ties that 4. Committee involvement
contribute 5. Advisorship of Co-
to the curricular activities Efficiency 2 0.1
teaching- 6. Book or Journal
learning Authorship/Co-
process. authorship/Contributorshi
p
7. Coordinatorship/
Chairpersonship
8. Coaching and mentoring
learners in competitions
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
9. Mentoring pre-service/in- Timeliness
service teachers
10. Others (Please specify
and provide annotations)

4.58

VIRGINIA F. LLEGADO JACQUELINE S. CANLAS MICHAEL R. DATU

Rater Ratee Approving Authority