Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mcom Project Strategic Management
Mcom Project Strategic Management
ON
BUSINESS MANAGEMENT
PART- 1 (SEMESTER-1)
(2021-2022)
INTERNAL ASSESSMENT
VIDYAVIHAR (EAST)
VIDYAVIHAR EAST
CERTIFICATE
(2021-2022)
This is to certify that the project titled INDIA’S JOURNEY TOWARDS $5 TRILLION DOLLAR
ECONOMY is a project work done by MIHIR MAHENDRA KOTHARI ROLL NO: 33 in
fulfillment of the requirements for the MCOM in ACOUNTANCY (PART-1) (SEMESTER-1)
during the academic year 2021-2022 is the original work done by the candidate and completed
under guidance of PROF. GIRISH KARNAD.
PLACE:- MUMBAI
…………………..... …………………….
Internal Examiner External Examiner
...................................
……………………
(Dr. SONALI DEOGIRIKAR) (Dr. VEENA
SANEKAR)
M. Com Coordinator Principal
DECLARATION BY STUDENT
Thank you,
Yours faithfully,
MIHIR
MAHENDRA KOTHARI
ROLL NO: 33
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to thank all the people who helped me in undertaking the study and completing the
project by imparting me with their valuable information and guidance that was required at every
stage of my project work.
I would like to Thank our Principal, DR. VEENA SANEKAR and MCOM Co-ordinator Dr.
SONALI DEOGIRIKAR, for giving me an opportunity and encouraging me to prepare the
project.
Last but not the least, I would like to thank my project guide PROF. GIRISH KARNAD for
guiding and helping me throughout the preparation of my project, right from selection of the
topic till its completion.
Objectives
To analyse the growth patterns of productive sectors and economy at large and, thereby,
postulate the sectoral growth rates to attain the US$ 5 trillion objective, we have made the
following attempts for our empirical analyses:
1. Growth trajectory for US$ 5 trillion: estimation of overall growth rates and timeline.
2. Analyses of sectoral and GDP growth patterns.
3. Sectoral growth trajectory for US$ 5 trillion GDP.
At the onset, we analysed the overall GDP growth rate required to attain US$ 5 trillion along
with impact of COVID-19 pandemic. In the second objective, the historical growth patterns and
contributions of three productive sectors—agriculture, industry and services—are ascertained.
This has helped us explore the growth trajectory of each productive sector in third objective. The
following section elaborates the analyses and results for each of the above objectives.
The latest GDP estimate for the current 2019-20 year and exchange rate of Rs 70.39 per dollar
(average exchange rate of 2019-20) yield a $2.9 trillion GDP. This has to touch the $5 trillion
level by 2024-25 (within five years).This implies exchange rate-adjusted compound annual
growth rate (CAGR) of about 13.5 per cent — close to NITI Aayog’s projection of 11.5 per cent.
It must be heeded, however, that this estimation of desired growth rate (CAGR) to attain the
GDP objective is devoid of the COVID-19 impact.In fact, the ambitious target of $5 trillion GDP
was set prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. The onslaught of COVID-19, followed by the
nationwide lockdown in the first quarter of 2020, has made India’s $5 trillion GDP target
surreal.Global uncertainty, disrupted trade and spiking the exchange rate to Rs 77 from Rs 70.39
per dollar swell the impossibility of achieving this target.Amid macroeconomic shocks and
uncertainties, many national and international institutions and rating agencies have released
revised GDP growth forecasts for 2020-21.Standard and Poor’s Global Inc, Fitch Solutions Inc,
the World Bank and the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) released negative growth projections
between -1.5 and -5 per cent.Moody’s Investors Service Inc and the International Monetary Fund
posited non-negative growth numbers of 0 per cent and 1.9 per cent.Most projections from
institutions and agencies, however, have a consensus on a growth outlook above seven per cent
for 2021-22. This is because of fiscal and monetary stimulus and reforms announced by the
conservative GDP growth rate of -3.2 per cent for 2020-21 relying on the World Bank’s estimate
and RBI’s negative territory forecast.It is inevitable that subdued growth of $5 trillion target
trajectory in 2020-21 will either devolve the growth pressure to subsequent years or push the
target year to a later period.Our estimation for the post-COVID-19 period from 2021-22 to 2024-
25 yields a CAGR of 18.1 per cent. This estimate indicates the Indian economy needs to grow at
an annual rate of 18.1 per cent to attain a GDP target of $5 trillion by 2024-25 which looks more
surreal than real.The unrealistic-looking projected growth rate of 18.1 per cent prompted us to
investigate the alternative to attain the $5 trillion target which is, naturally, a postponement of
the target year.In the post-COVID-19 period, the economy is expected to recover and revive as
argued by multilateral institutions, rating agencies and economists, including the Centre’s chief
economic advisor.Economists went ahead and said the Indian market will emerge stronger than
ever post-COVID-19, given liquidity support and future demand.This revival is attributable to
stimulus and reforms announced by the Centre for all productive sectors. These stimuli and
reforms may attract investment and growth in productive sectors and primarily include:
The effectiveness of these stimuli and reforms, however, depend on their implementation and
thus remain debatable.Given this, from 2021-22, we postulated the economy’s productive sectors
to follow their respective historical growth trajectories of the previous five years.Therefore,
agriculture, industry and services are expected to grow annually at their historical average of
about 7.5 per cent, 9.0 per cent and 11.4 per cent respectively.This looks more realistic and
acceptable than the 18.1 per cent annual growth rate derived and discussed earlier.These
considerations and analyses revealed the Indian economy can attain only $3.8 trillion by 2024-25
and reach the $5 trillion mark by 2027-28 with a CAGR of 9.97 per cent.This implies COVID-19
pushed India’s $5 trillion dream by three years.Further, our analyses with different GDP
forecasts for the COVID-19 impacted year reveal any projected GDP growth rate between -5 per
cent and four per cent during 2020-21 pushes the $5 trillion objective by three years further.The
discussion on GDP growth trajectory, with COVID-19 impact and without it, is visualised
India’s resolve to sell stakes in Public Sector Enterprises (PSEs) could be a game-changer for the
economy and help fund capital expenditures. In fiscal 2022, the government has budgeted $25
billion from stake sales in PSEs and financial institutions. It looks ambitious, yet we reckon the
total value of the government stake in the BSE PSU Index (BSETPSU) is $170 billion, almost 7x
the 2022 divestiture target. Including stake-sale proceeds from unlisted firms, the government
could pull in $200 billion in revenue over the next four years, which can be used to stimulate the
economy.
Abolishing personal taxes in India could be the biggest stimulus to the economy, making the
country an attractive hub for global talent and foreign investment. The contribution of income
taxes in India is 2.5% of the GDP, quite low compared with most other countries. Only a quarter
of the overall tax revenue is collected via the income levy, with corporate accounting for 25%,
and indirect — primarily the Goods and Services Tax (GST) — 50%. About 2-3% of Indians pay
income taxes and mostly comprise the salaried class. Slashing or reducing personal tax rates will
A part of the revenue shortfall can be recovered from higher indirect taxes demand gets a boost
India needs to focus on outcome-driven infrastructure spending by charting a 10-year fiscal path
for rating agencies. Dedicated focus on building new cities, ports, bridges, high-speed rail and
highways will have a multiplier effect on jobs and help reduce unemployment. Projects as part of
National Infrastructure Pipeline (NIP), with capital spending of $1.4 trillion, should be expedited
and monitored against timelines. For funding, private financiers, off-balance sheet funding,
overseas pensions and insurance capital should be sought, with a quasi-sovereign guarantee.
Any wastefulness because of higher infrastructure spending won’t be a concern in the long run,
Amid the Covid-19 crisis, India became the largest producer of personal protective equipment
(PPE), which is a testimony to the country’s manufacturing prowess. Before the pandemic, India
was a net importer of PPE kits. However, amid import bans and within a span of two months, the
country became self-reliant for PPE and started exporting the kits. The government should
capitalize on this momentum and aggressively set out to become self-reliant. As companies adapt
the “China + One” strategy, India’s government must show its intent with faster land clearances,
reduced bureaucracy and greater incentives to attract investments in sectors like medical textiles,
Improvement in land and capital productivity, along with attracting longer-term capital, will
India’s drastically low health-care spending must be increased through targeted, outcome-based
stimulus. The pandemic has starkly illustrated India’s inadequate health-care spending, hovering
near 3.6% of GDP, according to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
(OECD). Other OECD countries spend an average of 8.8% of GDP, while the other BRICS
nations — Brazil, Russia, China and South Africa — are at 6.3%. To improve the skewed
distribution of medical facilities, India could provide incentives for doctors and entrepreneurs to
Direct-benefit transfers could be in the form of skill credits for medical workers or enticements
The recent Union Budget proposed on the 5th of July 2019 began with a remark regarding the $5
trillion economy. The debate regarding the $5 trillion economy begins from this very remark as it
reflects the larger economic agenda of the newly elected NDA government. The document, to a
large extent, was a policy outline reflecting the stance of the government with regard to this and
the means that they are intending to employ in order to attain the goal of $5 trillion economy,
thereby putting India at the third place in terms of GDP only after USA and China.
The first means adopted by the government was structural reform. The undertaking of structural
reforms was a means to address issues of inefficiency. This was an area that the NDA had been
successfully made use of during their previous term. Tax reforms especially in terms of the GST
have transformed indirect taxation. Though it had a short-term negative impact, in the long run, it
has been envisaged to be beneficial for the growth of the economy. Several reforms in the area of
banking, bankruptcy, digitalisation and the like have worked towards simplifying functioning for
productive enterprises and the ease of living for individuals.
The budget makes an attempt to tap into the productive sectors of the economy and boost them in
ways that would enable further growth of the GDP. Sectors that are bound to produce assured
returns in terms of GDP growth have been targeted. The relaxation of the tax burden for
corporates by bring 99.3% of all companies under the 25% tax bracket, incentives and push for
start-ups and so on are some attempts. The budget even pointed out to a possibility of
commercialisation of space technology by the formation of a commercial wing at the ISRO. The
heavy push for the private sector and commercialisation can be seen as steps towards attaining
the $5 trillion goal.
The question that arises is whether India is capable of attaining this goal within the short period
of time stipulated. For $5 trillion to be attained, India essentially needs to double its GDP. The
former RBI governor C Raghuram Rajan has stated that for India to be able to attain this goal, a
sustained growth of 8% is required. The growth figures of India in the recent times have been a
little fuzzy with reports providing misleading statistics. Rajan also mentioned that with the
demand for welfare spending on the rise, there are limitations to the extent to which the
government can invest in the economy. The ability to attain this goal in such short period of time
is questionable.