Complaint: Commissioner@afp - Gov.au Acv@health - Gov.au Committees@health - Gov.au

Page 1
1
2
3 Reece Kershaw (Australian date) 25-7-2022
4 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
5 Forwarded via email commissioner@afp.gov.au
6
7 Cc: acv@health.gov.au Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
8 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
9 Committees@health.gov.au Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
10 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
11
12 Mr A. Albanese (via portal)
13
14 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier daniel.andrews@parliament.vic.gov.au
15 attorney-general@justice.vic.gov.au
16
17 Re: 20220725-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the AFP-Suppl 78-
18 Re Trust the Government, etc
19
20 COMPLAINT
21 Sir,
22 further to my original COMPLAINT of 6 August 2021 I provide a further supplement hereby.
23
24 It should be understood that "Any person who has taken an oath or made a declaration or
25 acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or adherence to a foreign power." And therefore
26 this includes any person who as an alliance with W.E.F. (World Economic Forum). W.H.O.
27 (World Health Organisation), etc. I will address certain issues below. Sarah hanson-0Young
28 being a member of the W.E.F. I view is not entitled to be a Member of Parliament. Indeed the
29 W.E.F. seeks to overthrow our constitutional system. Likewise many others are not entitled to be
30 Members of Parliament.
31
32 Who really is a Mem,ber of Parliament?
33
34 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
35 Convention)
36 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
37 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
38 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
39 misconception.
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Hansard 2-4-1891 Constitution Convention Debates
43 QUOTE
44 Sir JOHN BRAY: I am very glad to hear that the committee considered the point,
45 although I think they arrived at a very unwise decision. The hon. gentleman who last spoke
46 is mistaken in what I take to be the drift of all parliaments. No parliament lives out the
47 full term of its existence. It is always dissolved before it actually expires, and so it would
48 be in this [start page 645] case. The practice almost invariably is for the house to be
49 dissolved, and a new house elected, before the expiration of the three years, the object
25-7-2022 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
admin@inspector-rikati.com See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 being that there shall always be a parliament in existence. The intention is not that
2 the members shall be elected for three years, but that they shall absolutely serve for
3 three years, and the three years ought for the sake of convenience to date from the
4 first meeting of parliament. At any rate, we ought to ensure that all the members shall be
5 elected for the same term, and that one member's time shall not expire three or four weeks
6 before the term of another member, as might be the case under this clause.
7 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: No!
8 Sir JOHN BRAY: I think so, because the date appointed for the return of the writs is not
9 necessarily the same in every district.
10 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: The clause does not say that each member shall sit for
11 three years, but that the house shall endure for that time!
12 Sir JOHN BRAY: But the house consists of members. At any rate, the operation of the
13 clause is not very clear, and I would ask hon. members to agree to the amendment I have
14 proposed.
15 Mr. BAKER: The hon. member, Sir Samuel Griffith, says that this clause is not
16 intended to fix the term for which members of the house shall hold office, but to fix
17 the duration of the house itself; but there can be no house without members. If the
18 writs are returned at different dates, members of parliament will hold office for
19 different periods.
20 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: No!

21 Mr. BAKER: That is how it strikes me. If the writ of one member is returned three
22 weeks before that of another, the first man will be a member of parliament for three weeks
23 longer than the other.
24 Mr. BARTON: The writs are appointed to be returned on the one day!
25 Mr. WRIXON: I must say that the amendment of the hon. member, Sir John Bray,
26 commends itself to my mind. Until parliament meets, and the members present
27 themselves, you do not really know who is a member of parliament and who is not.
28 Up to that time a man is only returned to serve in parliament, and it may be that he
29 will not take the oath when he presents himself at the table, or it may be that he is
30 disqualified, and, therefore, until the house meets, and the members take the oath,
31 and qualify themselves, you do not know who are members of parliament and who
32 are not. It seems to me, therefore, that you have one uniform date at which you know
33 those who really are members of parliament when you start from the first meeting of
34 parliament. But if the day of the return of the writs is uncertain, you will not know
35 who are members of parliament until they are actually sworn in.
36 END QUOTE
37
38 Hansard 5-3-1891 Constitution convention Debates
39 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN:
40 The people of this continent were not landed upon its shore to-day ignorant of the
41 responsibilities of self-government. They have amply proved in the past that they are
42 entitled to be trusted with all the powers appertaining to a free people. They have
43 believed that they enjoyed freedom [start page 86] under their present constitution
44 second to none in the world.
45 END QUOTE
46
Page 3

2 QUOTE Mr. HOLDER.-
3 We know that it could never have been perfect by any possible contingency. But we may
4 claim that it is sufficiently perfect for a free and self-reliant people to live under its
5 rule with their freedom undiminished; and my answer to those who ask whether the
6 Bill is acceptable in this light is this: When we met in this Convention we entered upon a
7 task in which we realized we should be untrue to the trust reposed in us if we had not
8 dealt with the matters which came before us with the sense of responsibility resting upon
9 every one of us that we were dealing with matters on behalf of independent and self-
10 reliant states.
11 END QUOTE
12
14 QUOTE
15 [start page 1012]
16 Mr. GLYNN (South Australia)[8.33]: Before the Committee proceeds to consider the
17 amendment which has been suggested by the Legislative Assembly of New South Wales,
18 I would suggest that we make an alteration in the first portion of the clause by adding
19 words to the effect that these disqualifications shall operate until the federal
20 parliament otherwise provides.
21 The Hon. E. BARTON: Does the hon. member contemplate the federal parliament
22 making provision exempting a man who has taken the oath of allegiance to a foreign
23 power?
24 Mr. GLYNN: This provision is really temporary. It is to cover the gap between the
25 adoption of the constitution and the passing of special legislation by the federal
26 parliament. I would ask hon. members also to consider the effect of sub-clauses II and III.
27 For instance, the meaning of the term "bankrupt" itself may change. It may be very
28 different twenty years hence from what it now is. Then there is the word "felony." As Sir
29 Samuel Griffith has pointed out, the meaning of the word "felony" is changing
30 considerably. In some colonies felony is comparatively a light offence; in other colonies
31 it is a heavy offence. In New Zealand felony is practically unknown to the federal law.
32 Changes similar to that which have taken place in New Zealand in regard to the meaning
33 of the word may take place in other colonies, and if you leave the clause as it stands you
34 will put it in the power of the states parliaments to either extend or diminish the
35 qualification by making a change in the meaning of "felony." I say that this is a matter for
36 the federal parliament, and that it ought not to be fixed perpetually in the constitution.
37 Again, as regards the construction of the clause itself, I would draw the attention of the
38 Drafting Committee to another matter. The hon. member, Mr. Barton, has referred to the
39 taking of an oath or declaration of allegiance. The first part of the clause, it will be seen,
40 does not read with the latter part of it. For instance, it says, "Any person who has taken
41 an oath or made a declaration or acknowledgment of allegiance, obedience, or
42 adherence to a foreign power." The clause then goes on to say that the person shall be
43 incapable of being chosen or sitting as a member of the senate or of the house of
44 representatives until the disability is removed. But, once a man takes an oath of this
45 kind, you cannot remove the disability because a thing is done. The amendment
46 required is purely a drafting amendment. The way in which the matter should be put
47 would be, until the removal of the disqualification caused by the taking of the oath. That
48 is the evident intent of the clause; but the wording of the clause is altogether different. I
49 think this is a matter that ought to be left to the federal parliament, and I think that the
50 words I suggest should be adopted.
Page 4
1 The HON. E. BARTON (New South Wales)[8.36]: I am unable to see that it would be a
2 good thing to limit this clause in the way suggested by my hon. friend, Mr. Glynn, who
3 has said that this is a matter that should be left to the federal parliament. This happens to
4 be just one of those matters which are included in the constitution of every one of the
5 colonies. All the colonial constitutions provide for such matters as these, and it is perhaps
6 right that they should provide for them, for even in the first parliament it would be rather
7 a strange thing to find persons who had taken oaths of allegiance to foreign powers, who
8 were undischarged bankrupts or insolvents, or who had been recently attainted of crime,
9 or convicted of felony or infamous crime. Unless you have provisions of this kind, it is
10 quite possible that somebody might take a violent affection for a gaol-bird, and put him
11 into parliament. We do not want that sort of thing. It is one thing not to put limita- [start
12 page 1013] tions on the ordinary freedom of the citizens of the commonwealth. It is
13 another thing to provide against the defilement of parliament; and this would be the case
14 as regards the 3rd sub-clause, whilst in the case of the 2nd sub-clause it would be the
15 admission into parliament of persons who had not purged themselves of certain
16 disabilities, while in the case of the first subclause it would be the entry of persons into
17 parliament whose very conditions would suggest that their interests were quite different
18 from those of the citizens of the country. Persons who have taken the oath of
19 allegiance to a foreign power are not to be classed in the same category as citizens of
20 the country for the purpose of joining in legislation.
21 An HON. MEMBER: And not to be trusted?
22 The Hon. E. BARTON: Not to be trusted, prima facie!

23 Mr. GLYNN: That is not one of my points!
24 The Hon. E. BARTON: If the definition of a point is a thing of no magnitude, it is not a

25 point because it is larger. These limitations having been put in all constitutions of the
26 Australian colonies, and having worked well, and prevented the entry of undesirable
27 persons into parliament, they may well be continued in the constitution we are now
28 framing. They are not limitations of the freedom of the electors. It is scarcely to be
29 supposed that, except by inadvertence or accident, the electors would vote for such a
30 person; but it is quite possible that the electors of the commonwealth, not knowing that
31 certain persons had taken the oath of allegiance to a foreign power or had become
32 attainted of some crime, or become bankrupt or insolvent-it is quite on the cards that such
33 persons would stand for election for the commonwealth parliament, and the electors
34 might choose them, not knowing who they were. That is not at all an improbable
35 supposition. Such a thing has happened, and it is a kind of thing which the electors are to
36 be protected against, because it is a state of things the electors themselves could not
37 provide against. They might be taken in warily; they might be caught in a trap. This is not
38 merely a case of preserving the freedom of the electors, but of preventing them from
39 being imposed upon by persons who otherwise might creep into parliament, perhaps, in
40 some cases, persons who were insidious enemies of the commonwealth, and in other
41 cases persons who had been attainted of crime, or who were under other conditions of
42 which they should rid themselves before they offered themselves for election to any
43 legislative assembly. I submit that on the whole it is very desirable to avoid making the
44 alteration suggested by the hon. member, Mr. Glynn; and while I am speaking, I think I
45 might say that, although it is far less objectionable, it would be desirable also not to
46 accept the amendment that has been suggested by the Legislative Assembly of this
47 colony.
48 END QUOTE
Page 5
1
3 QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
4 I believe that, with certain alterations in the financial provisions, that Bill is a measure
5 under which the colonies could even now safely federate. Not that I say it is the best Bill
6 that could be framed; but I do believe it is a well-devised and well-drawn Constitution,
7 and a Constitution [start page 11] under which a free people-making such
8 amendments from time to time as necessity will require, and the powers given by the
9 Constitution will allow-might live in perfect freedom and with perfect security.
10 END QUOTE
11
13 QUOTE
14 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: What is the way to do it I am not now considering. But I
15 hope I am not misunderstood in calling attention to that difficulty as likely to arise. I
16 believe myself that the system which we call responsible government is the best that has
17 yet been invented in the history of the world for carrying on the good government of the
18 people, and I hope that it will be instituted in the Federal Government of Australia. But, at
19 the same time, I desire to point out the great possibility-almost probability-that that
20 system, as we have it at the present time, if we insist upon members of the executive
21 being members of the legislature, and insist upon their commanding always a
22 majority in one house of the legislature, may not work. We have to devise a constitution
23 that will work, that will have within its bounds sufficient scope to allow of any
24 development.
25 END QUOTE
26
28 QUOTE Mr. MUNRO:
29 . I quite admit that the United States system suits them; and if we are simply going to
30 form a republic, and to establish an institution in which the executive will not be in
31 Parliament, and will not be responsible, the state of affairs will be totally different.
32 But I am contemplating that this Convention has in view the formation of true responsible
33 government.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 HANSARD 26-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates
37 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS:
38 There is a line up to which concession may become at any moment a sacred duty, but to
39 pass that line would be treason; and therefore, when we are asked solemnly and gravely
40 to abandon the principle of responsible government, when we are invited to surrender the
41 latest-born, but, as I think, the noblest child of our constitutional system-a system which
42 has not only nurtured and preserved, but has strengthened the liberties of our people-then,
43 END QUOTE
44
46 QUOTE
47 Mr. BARTON.- We have simply said that the guarantee of the liberalism of this
48 Constitution is responsible government, and that we decline to impair or to infect in
49 any way that guarantee.
50 END QUOTE
51
53 QUOTE
54 Mr. BARTON.-this Constitution is to be worked under a system of responsible
55 government
56 END QUOTE
Page 6
1
3 QUOTE
4 Mr. BARTON.- Of course it will be argued that this Constitution will have been
5 made by the Parliament of the United Kingdom. That will be true in one sense, but
6 not true in effect, because the provisions of this Constitution, the principles which it
7 embodies, and the details of enactment by which those principles are enforced, will all
8 have been the work of Australians.
9 END QUOTE
10
12 QUOTE
13 Mr. BARTON.- Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have
14 provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the
15 provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the
16 people.
17 END QUOTE
18 .
20 QUOTE
21 Mr. DEAKIN.- In this Constitution, although much is written much remains
22 unwritten,
23 END QUOTE
24
26 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
27 Is it a Constitution which gives all reasonable and liberal guarantees of freedom?
28 That can only be answered in one way. Is it a Constitution the action of which, until
29 amended by the people, is preserved and safeguarded? There is only one answer to that.
30 Is it a Constitution which the people themselves, by their will expressed by their
31 Parliament and themselves, are able to alter to suit their needs under conditions of
32 reasonable thought, without unreasonable difficulty? There can be no answer but one to.
33 that question.
34 END QUOTE
35
37 QUOTE Mr. HOLDER.-
38 We know that it could never have been perfect by any possible contingency. But we may
39 claim that it is sufficiently perfect for a free and self-reliant people to live under its
40 rule with their freedom undiminished; and my answer to those who ask whether the
41 Bill is acceptable in this light is this: When we met in this Convention we entered upon a
42 task in which we realized we should be untrue to the trust reposed in us if we had not
43 dealt with the matters which came before us with the sense of responsibility resting upon
44 every one of us that we were dealing with matters on behalf of independent and self-
45 reliant states.
46 END QUOTE
47
49 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN:
50 They have believed that they enjoyed freedom [start page 86] under their present
51 constitution second to none in the world. When the
52 question of a second chamber comes to be considered, they will assuredly not be satisfied
53 to possess less freedom. More than this. In framing a federal constitution, we should set
54 out with the explicit claim to possess and exercise all the rights and privileges of
55 citizens of the British empire to the same extent that they are possessed and
Page 7
1 exercised by our fellow-countrymen in Great Britain itself. Australia is entitled to

2 absolute enfranchisement. In our union we attain political manhood and the stature of a
3 full-grown democracy.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 Considering as recent attack by Anthony Albanese upon Scott Morrison I view it is essential to
7 clarify matters.
8
9 Anyone who read my numerous writings will be well aware that I have often repeated that I view
10 Scott Morrison to be a TRAITOR, terrorist, and committed war crimes, crimes against
11 humanity, fraud, etc. As such I am not some liberal stooge who seek to take party lines. I have
12 also expressed that in my view the Governor-General had no constitutional powers to
13 commission Anthony Albanese to be a Minister, as he violated Section 44 of the Constitution
14 and the Governor-General cannot violate the provisions of the constitution to commission a
15 person in violation with s44. If anything the High Court of Australia in many cases held a person
16 was not validly a Member of Parliament where being in violation of Section 44 and the fact that
17 the Governor-General had Commissioned such a person (consider Barnaby Joyce) did not
18 validate the commission/appointment. I have also expressed my view that Anthony Albanese is a
19 TRAITOR, terrorist, committed war crimes, crimes against humanity, fraud, etc. As such, no
20 one can claim that I somehow take sides based upon some political alliance.
21
22 Scott Morrison reportedly stated “We don’t trust in governments. We don’t trust in the United
23 Nations. Thank goodness.” and Anthony Albanese attacked Scott Morrison for stating this such
24 as “The idea that he’s out there and pressing the United Nations button ... I’ve spent two months
25 trying to repair our international relations and that sort of nonsense, throwaway, conspiracy line
26 about the United Nations I think isn’t worthy of someone who led Australia.” & astonishing”
27 “nonsense” and unworthy of someone who led Australia”
28 I now ill first quote the article and then will have the Framers of the Constitution explain which
29 one expressed the correct position!
30
31 https://10play.com.au/theproject/articles/anthony-albanese-condemns-scott-morrisons-anti-
32 government-sermon-calling-it-nonsense/tpa220721jdgtm
33 QUOTE
34 Anthony Albanese Condemns Scott Morrison’s Anti-Government Sermon Calling It
35 “Nonsense”
36 21 Jul 2022
37 (IMAGE NOT REPRODUCED)
38 Prime minister Anthony Albanese states he found Scott Morrison’s comments about the
39 UN and government during a church sermon “astonishing” “nonsense” and unworthy of
40 someone who led Australia.
41 Scott Morrison, the former Prime Minister of Australia visited the opening of Tennis
42 Player, Margaret Court’s Victory Life Centre church in Perth.
43 During the visit he hosted a sermon where he made a number of points about the lack of
44 trust he has in the government and world leaders.
45 Stating: “We don’t trust in governments. We don’t trust in the United Nations. Thank
46 goodness.”
47 “We don’t trust in all of these things, fine as they might be, and as important a role as they
48 play.

Page 8
1 Believe me, I’ve worked in it, and they are important but as someone who’s been in it, if
2 you are putting your faith in those things like I put my faith in the Lord, you are making a
3 mistake. They’re earthly. They are fallible. I’m so glad we have a bigger hope.”
4 Speaking to ABC breakfast Albanese shared his thoughts on Morrison’s statements.

5 “I just thought, wow. This guy was the prime minister of Australia and had that great
6 honour of leading the government. I found it quite astonishing”
7 It provides some explanation perhaps of why, in my view, he clearly didn’t lead a

8 government that was worthy of the Australian people – he said he doesn’t believe in
9 government.
10 The idea that he’s out there and pressing the United Nations button ... I’ve spent two
11 months trying to repair our international relations and that sort of nonsense, throwaway,
12 conspiracy line about the United Nations I think isn’t worthy of someone who led
13 Australia.”
14 END QUOTE
15
16 It appears to me that Anthony Albanese would do better to learn what the legal principles
17 embedded in the constitution are about. It is not to go around to some war zone to try to be
18 placing political grandeur while ignoring the floods in Australia. It is not to make some
19 agreement to fund Ukraine and provide weapons in a fraudulent manner without the
20 consent/approval of the Parliament. It is not to provide the IMF with $20 million to assist
21 Ukraine. It is not to give a France business $850 million without the consent/approval of the
22 Parliament.
23 As the Parliament has not been sitting since 31 March 2022 then clearly anything like this must
24 be considered FRAUD. Also, the submission to the U.N. of a reduction in whatever by 2050 is
25 not within the constitutional legislative powers of the Commonwealth. Let alone the Federal
26 Government!
27
28 HANSARD 19-4-1897 Constitution Convention
29 QUOTE Mr. CARRUTHERS:
30 Mr. Barton first of all recites Dicey to show what occurs under the unwritten
31 Constitution of England. But here we are framing a written Constitution. When
32 once that Constitution is framed we cannot get behind it.
33 END QUOTE
34
36 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES:
37 (2.) A judiciary, consisting of a federal supreme court, which shall constitute a high court
38 of appeal for Australia, under the direct authority of the Sovereign, whose decisions, as
39 such, shall be final.
40 (3.) An executive, consisting of a governor-general and such persons as may from time to
41 time be appointed as his advisers, such persons sitting in Parliament, and whose term of
42 office shall depend upon their possessing the confidence of the house of representatives,
43 expressed by the support of the majority.
44 END QUOTE
45
47 QUOTE Sir HENRY PARKES:
48 The resolutions conclude:

Page 9
1 An executive, consisting of a governor-general, and such persons as may from time

2 to time be appointed as his advisers, such persons sitting in Parliament, and whose
3 term of office shall depend upon their possessing the confidence of the house of
4 representatives expressed by the support of the majority.
5 What is meant by that is simply to call into existence a ministry to conduct the affairs of
6 the new nation as similar as it can be to the ministry of England-a body of constitutional
7 advisers who shall stand as nearly as possible in the same relation to the representative of
8 the Crown here [start page 27] a her Majesty's imperial advisers stand is relation to the
9 Crown directly. These, then, are the principles which my resolutions seek to lay down as a
10 foundation, as I have already stated, for the new super structure, my object being to invite
11 other gentlemen to work upon this foundation so as to best advance the ends we have in
12 view.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 It must be clear that where both claimed to have been Ministers then both should be well aware
16 what as part of “a body of constitutional advisers” the constitution stands for.
17
19 QUOTE Mr. OCONNOR.-
20 We must remember that in any legislation of the Commonwealth we are dealing with the
21 Constitution. Our own Parliaments do as they think fit almost within any limits. In this
22 case the Constitution will be above Parliament, and Parliament will have to conform
23 to it.
24 END QUOTE
25 .
27 QUOTE
28 Mr. HIGGINS.-No, because the Constitution is not passed by the Parliament.
29 END QUOTE
30 .
32 QUOTE
33 Mr. GORDON.- The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes
34 on the Constitution we will have to wipe it out."
35 END QUOTE
36
38 QUOTE
39 Mr. WISE.-If the Federal Parliament chose to legislate upon, say, the education
40 question-and the Constitution gives it no power to legislate in regard to that question-the
41 Ministers for the time being in each state might say-"We are favorable to this law, because
42 we shall get £100,000 a year, or so much a year, from the Federal Government as a subsidy
43 for our schools," and thus they might wink at a violation of the Constitution, while no
44 one could complain. If this is to be allowed, why should we have these elaborate
45 provisions for the amendment of the Constitution? Why should we not say that the
46 Constitution may be amended in any way that the Ministries of the several colonies
47 may unanimously agree? Why have this provision for a referendum? Why consult the
48 people at all? Why not leave this matter to the Ministers of the day? But the proposal
49 has a more serious aspect, and for that reason only I will ask permission to occupy a
50 few minutes in discussing it.
51 END QUOTE
52 .
54 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
Page 10
1 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving
2 that people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy
3 from day to day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts
4 through ignorance into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people
5 having this security, it must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any
6 one may say to the contrary that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of
7 the British Constitution is secured. It is secured by vesting in the people, through their
8 representatives, the power of the purse, and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is
9 no other way of securing absolute freedom to a people than that, unless you make a
10 different kind of Executive than that which we contemplate, and then overload your
11 Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the citizen from interference. Under
12 this Constitution he is saved from every kind of interference. Under this Constitution
13 he has his voice not only in the, daily government of the country, but in the daily
14 determination of the question of whom is the Government to consist. There is the
15 guarantee of freedom in this Constitution. There is the guarantee which none of us
16 have sought to remove, but every one has sought to strengthen. How we or our work
17 can be accused of not providing for the popular liberty is something which I hope the
18 critics will now venture to explain, and I think I have made their work difficult for
19 them. Having provided in that way for a free Constitution, we have provided for an
20 Executive which is charged with the duty of maintaining the provisions of that
21 Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as the agents of the people. We have
22 provided for a Judiciary, which will determine questions arising under this
23 Constitution, and with all other questions which should be dealt with by a Federal
24 Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all courts in the states that
25 choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not provided, first, that our
26 Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the will of the people,
27 which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution shall not, nor shall
28 any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court appointed by their
29 own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a perversion of its
30 provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed as
31 the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for no
32 citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that those
33 who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the Parliament of
34 the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the Constitution, they are
35 bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making a Constitution of this
36 kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or infringe its provisions,
37 then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not altered in terms-so
38 whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it gives your people
39 will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you are creating here,
40 which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a tribunal as will
41 preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent, under any pretext
42 of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the states, or the states
43 from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided for all these things,
44 I think this Convention has done well.
45 END QUOTE
46
48 QUOTE
49 Mr. CARRUTHERS:
50 This is a Constitution which the unlettered people of the community ought to be able
51 to understand.
52 END QUOTE
Page 11
1 .
3 QUOTE
4 The Right Hon. C.C. KINGSTON (South Australia)[9.21]: I trust the Drafting Committee will not fail to
5 exercise a liberal discretion in striking out words which they do not understand, and that they will put
6 in words which can be understood by persons commonly acquainted with the English language.
7 END QUOTE
8
9 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
10 Convention)
11 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS.-
12 We want a people's Constitution, not a lawyers' Constitution.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 It must be very clear, even for Blind Freddy, that the Government of the Day can only act within
16 the provisions of the laws that Parliament enacted within the limits of the Commonwealth of
17 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and not in violation thereof.
18
19 One now has to ask how does this then explain who is correct in if a Government/UN should be
20 trusted or not?
21
22 Well, let me further quote the Framers of the Constitution:
23
25 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
26 No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses
27 of Parliament act capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if
28 the Houses choose to agree to it-let the Houses do one thing one day and another the next,
29 and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but trust the Parliament." Of course;
30 but Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution. The Senate of
31 to-day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the
32 Constitution.
33 END QUOTE
34
36 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
37 No one is more in favour of that than I am. But, at the same time, it is said-"Let the Houses
38 of Parliament act capriciously and variously from day to day-allow this 'tacking' to go on if
39 the Houses choose to agree to it-let the Houses do one thing one day and another the next,
40 and do not bother about altering the Constitution, but trust the Parliament." Of course; but
41 Parliament must only be trusted when it is within the Constitution. The Senate of to-
42 day and the House of Representatives must not be put in a position superior to the
43 Constitution.
44 END QUOTE
45 .
47 QUOTE
48 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-Now it is coming out. The Constitution is made for the people
49 and the states on terms that are just to both.
50 Mr. DEAKIN.-It is made for the lawyers under this clause.

51 Sir JOHN DOWNER.-I do not think so.

Page 12
1 If you say "Trust the Parliament," no Constitution is required at all ; it can

2 simply be provided that a certain number of gentlemen shall be elected, and meet together,
3 and, without limitation, do what they like. Victoria would not agree to that. But there is a
4 desire to draw the very life-blood of the Constitution, so far as the states are concerned, by
5 this insidious amendment, which would give the Houses authority from time to time to
6 put different constructions on this most important part of the Constitution. I hope we
7 will do as we have done in many instances before, in matters that have been much debated-
8 adhere to the decision we have already arrived at.
9 END QUOTE
10
12 QUOTE Mr. WISE:
13 If my proposal is carried it will give an alternative to that already carried by the hon. and
14 learned member, Mr. Symon, the alternative being that in lieu of the course confirmed by
15 the carrying of the hon. and learned member's amendment both houses may be dissolved,
16 provided and here is the safeguard for the security of the senate-that the dissolution of the
17 senate shall not take effect within six months of the period at which the house of
18 representatives would expire by effluxion of time. That is to say, to guard against the
19 danger, suggested by one of the representatives of South Australia, of the power of
20 dissolution being recklessly used when the house of representatives is just about to go to
21 the country, in order to punish the senate and involving no punishment of the house of
22 representatives, I propose that the senate shall not be dissolved at any time within six
23 months before the natural expiry of the life of the house of representatives. That is a
24 safeguard against the abuse of the power, while the possession of the power would be a
25 weapon to insure, and the only weapon which will insure, to the executive the proper
26 control of the parliamentary machine. If the amendment be carried, we can afterwards
27 discuss what should take place in the event of the dissolution not giving satisfactory
28 results-whether the referendum should be adopted, or whether we should provide for a
29 meeting of the two houses. At the present moment, I do not see my way to support a
30 proposal for the meeting of the two houses before any dissolution takes place, or before the
31 power of dissolution has been given to the executive, because, as the right hon. member,
32 Sir George Turner, pointed out, the result might be that the majority of the senate might
33 conspire with the minority of the house of representatives to put out a ministry which was
34 responsible to the house of representatives, and which had a majority there. If that ministry
35 went out of office, what could the incoming ministry do, because it would have a minority
36 in the house of representatives? Representative government could not be carried out under
37 these conditions. Therefore, as this device of the meeting of the two houses is only to be
38 employed as [start page 878] a last resource, I shall be prepared to trust to the old, well-
39 known methods of giving to the executive government full control of parliament, and to
40 trust them to prevent its abuse, and, if possible, its exercise.
41 END QUOTE
42
44 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.
45 If we are going to give the Federal Parliament power to legislate as it pleases with regard to
46 Commonwealth citizenship, not having defined it, we may be enabling the Parliament to
47 pass legislation that would really defeat all the principles inserted elsewhere in the
48 Constitution, and, in fact, to play ducks and drakes with it.
49 That is not what is meant by the term "Trust the Federal Parliament."
50 END QUOTE

Page 13
1
3 QUOTE
4 Mr. SYMON.-Very likely not. What I want to know is, if there is anybody who will
5 come under the operation of the law, so as to be a citizen of the Commonwealth, who
6 would not also be entitled to be a citizen of the state? There ought to be no opportunity for
7 such discrimination as would allow a section of a state to remain outside the pale of the
8 Commonwealth, except with regard to legislation as to aliens. Dual citizenship exists,
9 but it is not dual citizenship of persons, it is dual citizenship in each person. There may
10 be two men-Jones and Smith-in one state, both of whom are citizens of the state, but
11 one only is a citizen of the Commonwealth. That would not be the dual citizenship
12 meant. What is meant is a dual citizenship in Mr. Trenwith and myself. That is to say,
13 I am a citizen of the state and I am also a citizen of the Commonwealth; that is the
14 dual citizenship. That does not affect the operation of this clause at all. But if we introduce
15 this clause, it is open to the whole of the powerful criticism of Mr. O'Connor and those who
16 say that it is putting on the face of the Constitution an unnecessary provision, and one
17 which we do not expect will be exercised adversely or improperly, and, therefore, it is
18 much better to be left out. Let us, in dealing with this question, be as careful as we
19 possibly, can that we do not qualify the citizenship of this Commonwealth in any way or
20 exclude anybody [start page 1764] from it, and let us do that with precision and clearness.
21 As a citizen of a state I claim the right to be a citizen of the Commonwealth. I do not
22 want to place in the hands of the Commonwealth Parliament, however much I may be
23 prepared to trust it, the right of depriving me of citizenship. I put this only as an
24 argument, because no one would anticipate such a thing, but the Commonwealth
25 Parliament might say that nobody possessed of less than £1,000 a year should be a citizen
26 of the Federation. You are putting that power in the hands of Parliament.
27 Mr. HIGGINS.-Why not?

28 Mr. SYMON.-I would not put such a power in the hands of any Parliament. We must
29 rest this Constitution on a foundation that we understand, and we mean that every
30 citizen of a state shall be a citizen of the Commonwealth, and that the Commonwealth
31 shall have no right to withdraw, qualify, or restrict those rights of citizenship, except
32 with regard to one particular set of people who are subject to disabilities, as aliens,
33 and so on.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 Well, we know now that the citizenship was unconstitutionally taken over by the
37 Commonwealth, albeit is and remains ULTRA VIRES,. (See AEC v Schorel-Hlavka )
38
"The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions, that I wish it to
be always kept alive. It will often be exercised when wrong, but better so than not to be
exercised at all. I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere."
—Thomas Jefferson (1787)
39
40 “Where an excess of power prevails, property of no sort is duly respected. No man is safe in
41 his opinions, his person, his faculties, or his possessions.” —James Madison (1792)
42
43 We are being betrayed by the Commonwealth having legislated to allow foreign troops without
44 legally accountable to harm Australians within the Commonwealth of Australia.
Page 14

2 QUOTE. Mr. BAKER:
3 That the military and naval defence of Australia shall be intrusted to federal forces under
4 one command.
5 Of course that is a sine qua non; and I hope we shall not do this thing by halves. I hope
6 we shall not, as has been done in the United States, provide for a divided authority over
7 any of our forces, whether those forces consist of a standing army, of citizen troops, of
8 militia, or of any other description of force whatever.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 Foreign troops such as the U.N. armed forces cannot be accepted as part of Australian defence
12 force whatsoever, and certainly not to engage in conduct to terrorize Australians, being for
13 unconstitutional vaccinations and/or whatever.
14
15 https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/australia-s-2billion-covid-quarantine-facility-
16 white-elephants-empty-and-unlikely-to-ever-be-used/ar-
17 AAZDOO7?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=56d72609a17140319651a4dad77d2d9f
18 Australia's $2BILLION Covid quarantine facility white elephants empty and unlikely
19 to EVER be used
20
21 Neither can we accept so called QUARANTINE centres operated by States/Territories as this
22 violates Federal powers.
23
24 The following article (one has to check the entire article for this to get some understanding about
25 the deception involved) may just expose why one cannot trust so called “scientist” whom have
26 been for 50 years predicting all kinds of scenarios, likely just to keep themselves in a job and the
27 gullible politicians went along with this. Reminds me on the COVID scam!
28
29 https://cei.org/blog/wrong-again-50-years-of-failed-eco-pocalyptic-predictions/
30 QUOTE
31 Thanks go to Tony Heller, who first collected many of these news clips and posted them
32 on RealClimateScience.
33 SUMMARY
34 Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the
35 1960s. They continue to do so today.
36 None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true.
37 What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in
38 government and science.
39 More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers
40 of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in
41 government and science.
42 While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media
43 eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 And yet Anthony Albanese without any constitutional powers nevertheless couldn’t wait to
47 betray Australians to be a servant for the communist U.N. agenda.
48

Page 15
1 https://www.westernjournal.com/bidens-climate-envoy-grilled-using-private-jet-emits-hundreds-thousands-lbs-
2 co2/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=conservative-
3 tribune&ats_es=14d63ad63339a8c4f9a817f5e715c34b
4 Biden's Climate Envoy Grilled for Using Private Jet that Emits Hundreds of Thousands of
5 Lbs. of CO2
6 QUOTE
7 He also added that Kerry and other climate activists are more than just hypocrites,
8 saying “it makes them, quite frankly, a threat to the rights and freedoms of people
9 around the world.”
10 END QUOTE
11
12 And this underlines the hypocrites where it means “One rule for thee and another one of me!”
13 Boris Johnson (UK) very much was like this with his mandates that citizens had to comply with
14 while he was blatantly ignoring it time and time again.
15 And the whole “climate change” shows to be utter and sheer nonsense where contrary to
16 assurances the solar panels are not capable of keeping up and in Germany now there is a return
17 to coal and nuclear power, etc, because wind turbines and solar panels cannot cope when the gas
18 is limited. Worse is that those who rely upon EV travel (Electric Vehicle) may discover that
19 many charging stations are broken down and/or are under water, etc.
20
21 https://tiremeetsroad.com/2020/02/12/shocking-photo-shows-uk-tesla-supercharger-bays-
22 underwater-built-on-flood-plain/
23 Shocking photo shows UK Tesla Supercharger bays underwater ...
24 12 Feb 2020 ... A shocking photo is making the rounds on the internet showing this Tesla
25 Supercharger and its bays in Wokingham, UK literally submerged ...
26 QUOTE
27
28 END QUOTE
29
30 Anyhow, for those needing to charge a tesla EV they may check out the website:
31
32 https://clouddropout.com/tesla-chargers-underwarter/
33 Tesla Chargers Underwater | 5 Things To Know
34
35 https://www.westernjournal.com/solar-panels-suffer-stunning-failure-weather-becomes-hot-
36 handle/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_conten
37 t=conservative-tribune&ats_es=14d63ad63339a8c4f9a817f5e715c34b
38 Solar Panels Suffer Stunning Failure as Weather Becomes 'Too Hot' for Them to Handle
39 QUOTE
40 Climate change activists tell us that solar will save the planet from overheating…it
41 turns out solar panels are LESS efficient in high temperatures. They are not the
42 solution, they’re inefficient, combust in the heat, slave labour made, need full
43 backup.. https://t.co/H7Wji6gtnE
44 END QUOTE
45 And
Page 16
1 QUOTE
2 “People think solar panels protect the environment but they require 300+ times as
3 much land as conventional energy sources and now the Los Angeles Times has
4 discovered that they could ‘contaminate groundwater with toxic heavy metals such as
5 lead, selenium and cadmium,'” Shellenberger tweeted on Sunday
6 END QUOTE
7
8 Video: “Why renewables can’t save the planet _ Michael Sh__ TEDxDanubia”
9 QUOTE
10
11
12
13
14
15

Page 17
4
5 END QUOTE
6
7 https://www.westernjournal.com/electric-police-cars-running-juice-way-rural-
8 emergencies/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=CTBreaking&ff_campaign=breaking&ff_content=conservative-
9 tribune
10 Electric Police Cars 'Running Out of Juice' on Way to Rural Emergencies
11
12 https://www.westernjournal.com/new-study-shows-electric-cars-much-lower-quality-gas-powered-
13 vehicles/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=conservative-brief-
14 WJ&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=western-journal&ats_es=%5B-MD5-%5D
15 New Study Shows Electric Cars Have Much Lower Quality Than Gas-Powered
16 Vehicles
17

Page 18
1 https://www.westernjournal.com/colossal-failure-ev-charging-stations-face-mechanical-problems-half-
2 inoperable-1-area/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=conservative-brief-
3 WJ&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=western-journal
4 Colossal Failure: EV Charging Stations Face Mechanical Problems - Over Half
5 Inoperable in 1 Area
6
7 https://www.westernjournal.com/another-ford-ev-recall-dangerous-defect-
8 time/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=newsletter-CT&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=conservative-
9 tribune
10 Another Ford EV Recall: Here's the Dangerous Defect This Time
11
12 What we have is a madman running loose to commit the Commonwealth of Australia to certain
13 U.N. climate change conditions, etc, disregarding the rights of Australians. This, while China
14 and India, as examples, reportedly continue to build coal fired power stations and so can
15 undercut the production cost of other countries that have gone ballistic over climate change.
16
18 QUOTE Mr. HIGGINS.-
19 . I should prefer to rest on the fact that the powers of the Federal Parliament are limited
20 under the Constitution itself, and that the Federal Parliament has no power to do
21 anything except what is expressly given to it, or what is by implication necessary.
22 END QUOTE
23
25 QUOTE
26 Mr. BARTON.-No; I do not think that there is anything in the Bill that takes it away.
27 Very well, then, if a state law, or the action of the state, or the action of a citizen of a state,
28 does not contravene Commonwealth legislation under that power of legislation, granted in
29 this Bill. the state law is still valid, and cannot be touched or interfered with, and that I
30 conceive is sufficient for the purpose of New South Wales under this Constitution. Now,
31 my honorable friend (Mr. Isaacs) yesterday, in that remarkably able and statesmanlike
32 speech which he made-one of the best speeches addressed to this Convention since it began
33 its sittings in Adelaide-mentioned state laws with regard to irrigation in the United States,
34 especially state laws passed with reference to the and country, and with reference to
35 California. Now, while my honorable friend mentioned those in support of his argument,
36 all those instances are evidences that, under the operation of the trade and commerce
37 clause in America, the right is retained to the states, under the United States Constitution,
38 to deal with these matters, and is recognised by the courts. And if there were any doubt
39 about that in our own' case, we have only to refer to clause 99 of this Bill, which tells us
40 that-
41
42 All powers which at the establishment of the Commonwealth are vested in the
43 Parliaments of the several colonies, and which are not by this Constitution exclusively
44 vested in the Parliament of the Commonwealth, or withdrawn from the Parliaments
45 of the several states, are reserved to, and shall remain vested in, the Parliaments of
46 the states respectively.
47 Mr. KINGSTON.-That is the reservation clause.

48 Mr. BARTON.-Yes, the reservation clause. Now, that clause has a twofold operation. It
49 means, first, that the power to deal with water conservation and irrigation, which, if
50 you rely on sub-section (1) alone, finds no mention in this Constitution, and,
51 therefore, is not a power given to the Commonwealth, but a power retained in the
Page 19
1 states absolutely. And it means, in addition to that, that the states will retain their
2 power of dealing with the navigation of their rivers, except so far as those rivers fall
3 under the domination-if you like to use that large word-of the legislation of the
4 Commonwealth, when the Commonwealth chooses to legislate on the subject of
5 navigation. So that the position of the state is secure as regards the conservation and
6 use of its waters, except to the extent that there may be an actual navigation law
7 passed by the Commonwealth, which may have the effect of limiting the state use of
8 the water of the rivers within that state.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 Again:
12 QUOTE
13 Mr. BARTON.-Yes, the reservation clause. Now, that
14 clause has a twofold operation. It means, first, that the
15 power to deal with water conservation and irrigation,
16 which, if you rely on sub-section (1) alone, finds no
17 mention in this Constitution, and, therefore, is not a
18 power given to the Commonwealth, but a power retained
19 in the states absolutely.
20 END QUOTE
21
22 How on earth can you trust any government where the person in
23 violation of constitutional limitations goes around the world big
24 noting himself unconstitutionally handing out monies and
25 weapons, etc, without any Parliamentarian approval?
26
27 And it appears to me that likely Ukraine NAZI government may be selling weapons &
28 ammunition to other countries!
29
30 https://www.westernjournal.com/cargo-plane-packed-11-tons-military-explosives-europe-
31 something-strange-kept-firefighters-
32 away/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=WJBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content
33 =western-journal&ats_es=14d63ad63339a8c4f9a817f5e715c34b
34 Cargo Plane Packed with 11 Tons of Military Explosives Down Over Europe, But
35 Something Strange Kept Firefighters Away
36 By Jack Davis July 17, 2022 at 12:28pm
37 QUOTE
38 When more than 11 tons of military explosives exploded after a Saturday place crash, fear
39 kept first responders away.
40 A Soviet-era four-engine turboprop cargo plane, piloted by a Ukrainian crew, was taking
41 11.5 tons of Serbian-made ordinance to Bangladesh when it came down in northern
42 Greece, according to ABC. Officials said illuminating mortar shells were among the cargo.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 This is when there is absolutely no control over where the moneys and weapons are going and so
46 any other humanitarian aid. I doubt any humanitarian aid ever went over the last 8 years to
47 Donbas subjected to bombardments by the Ukraine NAZI government.

Page 20
1 https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/06/no_author/loud-drums-of-war-the-dangers-of-a-longer-
2 and-extended-war-in-ukraine-towards-a-unipolar-world/
3 “Loud Drums of War”: The Dangers of a “Longer and Extended
4 War” in Ukraine. Towards a Unipolar World?
5 QUOTE
6 US-NATO Wars of the Post Cold War Era
7 But after the victory of the “West” in 1990, “wars of order” [responsibility to protect] were
8 instigated in many places in the world, such as the war against Iraq orchestrated by Bush
9 Sr. in 1991. Some may still remember the unsavory Kuweit “incubator lie” that ultimately
10 tipped the scales in favor of the UN’s blessing for that war.
11 When, on March 24, 1999, NATO launched the first war of aggression in its history
12 without a UN mandate and thus in violation of international law against a sovereign
13 country, it was immediately followed by a new doctrine permitting future interventions
14 without a UN mandate.
15 The wars of the so-called “Value West” [“Humanitarian West”, under “Responsibility to
16 Protect”] in Iraq as well as in Afghanistan, Libya and Syria did not reorganize anything,
17 but only led to “failed states”, i.e. into never-ending chaos – also a war crime.
18 NATO’s war in Yugoslavia began on March 24, 1999 – 12 days earlier Poland, the Czech
19 Republic and Hungary had joined NATO. Was this just another war in the wake of the
20 post-Yugoslav secession wars since the early 1990s? Certainly not, because 4 imperial
21 motives of the USA can be identified(17)
22 1) A war of NATO Against the rest of Yugoslavia in order to insert it into the periphery of
23 the West.
24 2) A war of the USA, in order to subjugate EU-Europe further to their subordination.
25 3) “A war whose long-distance effect was also aimed at further chastening Russia”; and
26 4) A war to demonstrate “NATO or US superiority over China”(18).
27 Color Revolutions
28 After the Yugoslav war, so-called “color revolutions” were concerted in Eastern Europe,
29 most of which then led to regime change and desired EU and NATO accession.
30 Canadian professor of economics, Michel Chossudovsky, drew attention in June 2015 to
31 the fact that behind the Ukraine crisis lies a broad military strategy that goes far beyond
32 Ukraine:
33 “NATO – and when we say NATO, we also mean the United States – is engaging in war
34 games on Russia’s doorstep … Now they are threatening Russia with nuclear weapons, and
35 it’s obvious that the nuclear option has been discussed in the U.S. Congress.”(19)
36 Then, in the summer of 2015, the Ukrainian parliament passed a law to that
37 effect,(20) stating that deployment of nuclear weapons and weapons of mass
38 destruction on the soil of Ukraine would be legal “until the deployment target is
39 reached.” Previously, this was ruled out by law.
40 From 2015, NATO’s maneuver frequency (such as DEFENDER 20/21) on Russia’s

41 doorstep increased dramatically. In parallel, the military infrastructure road and rail from
42 Antwerp/Bremerhaven/ Hamburg towards Görlitz, Krakow and Kiev was made fit for war.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 Also consider the following:
Page 21
1
2 https://www.globalresearch.ca/five-years-mh17s-destruction-clear-lack-evidence-remains-moscow-
3 culpable/5683793?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles
4 Six Years on from Malaysia Airlines MH17 Destruction: A Clear Lack of Evidence that
5 Moscow Was Behind It
6 QUOTE
7 Australia’s involvement in the MH17 proceedings also merits a degree of
8 wariness. In recent years, following the West’s lead, Australian administrations
9 have engineered and expanded a range of sanctions against Russia – relating
10 from the March 2014 Crimea takeover to the Kerch Strait incident of last
11 November.
12 US-Aussie relations have long been collaborative, and are growing closer in an
13 attempt to offset rising Chinese power in the Pacific region. Australian
14 governments sanctioned military engagement alongside US forces in the highly
15 destructive wars in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq.
16 END QUOTE
17
18 What we have is an ongoing betrayal/treason by Australian governments as to join into
19 warmongering without any DECLARATION OF WAR by the Governor-General!
20
22 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
23 Then, again, there is the prerogative right to declare war and peace, an adjunct of which
24 it is that the Queen herself, or her representative, where Her Majesty is not present,
25 holds that prerogative. No one would ever dream of saying that the Queen would declare
26 war or peace without the advice of a responsible Minister.
27 END QUOTE
28
30 QUOTE
31 Mr. DEAKIN: We can make an exception in favour of imperial interests. We have no
32 desire to interfere with the imperial prerogative in matters of war and peace!
33 END QUOTE
34
36 QUOTE
37 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: At all events, I would ask hon. members to pause before
38 they determine upon asking the Queen to surrender all her prerogatives in Australia. For
39 my part, I believe that all the prerogatives of the Crown exist in the governor-general
40 as far as they relate to Australia. I never entertained any doubt upon the subject at all-
41 that is so far as they can be exercised in the commonwealth.
42 END QUOTE
43
44 Now consider the following also:
45
46 https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/european-union-ambassador-argues-its-essential-for-
47 communist-china-to-rule-the-world/?utm_source=daily-2022-07-21&utm_medium=email
48 European Union ambassador argues it’s ‘essential’ for Communist China to ‘rule the
49 world’
50 'The EU does not defend the independence of Taiwan, but the peaceful reunification,'
51 said the former Spanish ambassador to Japan.
Page 22
1 QUOTE
2 (LifeSiteNews) — In a shocking interview, Spain’s former ambassador to Japan,
3 Jorge Toledo Albiñana, said the European Union wants a “peaceful
4 reunification” between China and Taiwan with the end goal of having
5 China “rule the world.”
6 “The EU does not defend the independence of Taiwan but the peaceful
7 reunification. We believe that there should be only one China,” Albiñana told
8 Spanish newspaper La Vanguardia in an interview published last Sunday.
9 Albiñana also told the paper that the EU sees China as a “partner” on the global
10 stage, and that it is “essential and necessary to have China to rule the world.”
11 Getting into specifics, Albiñana cited the COVID-19 so-called pandemic, Iran’s
12 nuclear weapons program, and the alleged “climate crisis” as some of the pertinent
13 issues the EU and world need China’s help with tackling.
14 END QUOTE
15
16 Also consider the following articles:
17
18 https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/run-up-to-the-american-bioterrorist?s=w
19 Run-up to the American bioterrorist State’s Jan. 31, 2020 declaration of war - Part 1.
20 Timeline of executive orders, patents, papers, regulations, statutes,
21
22 https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/run-up-to-the-american-bioterrorist-37f?s=w
23 Run-up to the American bioterrorist State’s Jan. 31, 2020 declaration of war - Part 2.
24 QUOTE
SDS
Jul 7
Thank you for all of your hard work, it is much appreciated. A couple of
things regarding Kary Mullis- he invented PCR (first successful experiment
was In 1983) and won a Nobel prize for it in 1993. He also said that it should
never be used for diagnosing disease because you could find just about
anything you wanted to in a sample using PCR. Personally, I don’t think any
of what’s happened during the last two and a half years could have happened
if Kary Mullis had still been alive as the whole charade is based on the
purposeful misuse of PCR and I believe Mullis would have been very, very
outspoken about its misuse
25 END QUOTE
26
27 https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-happened-natos-madrid-summit
28 What Happened at NATO's Madrid Summit?
29 QUOTE
30 Q6: What does the strategic concept say about China and the Indo-Pacific?
31 A6: In the footsteps of the 2019 London declaration and 2021 Brussels communiqué, the
32 new strategic concept states that China’s “ambitions and coercive policies challenge our
33 interests, security and values.” The threat from China includes “malicious hybrid and cyber
34 operations and its confrontational rhetoric and disinformation,” control of key
35 technological and industrial sectors, and growing partnership with Russia.
Page 23
1 While allies remain “open to constructive engagement,” they also stand ready to enhance
2 “resilience and preparedness” to address the “systemic challenges” posed by Beijing.
3 Interestingly, the concept specifies that NATO and the European Union will increase their
4 cooperation on China, a welcomed orientation to avoid duplication.
5 The concept also stresses the importance of the Indo-Pacific for NATO, outlining that
6 “developments in that region can directly affect Euro-Atlantic security.” NATO will
7 therefore strengthen its “dialogue and cooperation” with its Indo-Pacific partners, namely
8 Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea, whose leaders participated in the summit
9 for the first time.
10 END QUOTE
11
12
13 Anthony Albanese seems not to be included in the photo and as such not deemed a rightful
14 partner (in crime)
15
16 QUOTE Email
17 Exposed! Secretive annual talks influenceAustralian foreign policy
18 Citizens Party <citizensparty@citizensmail.com.au>
19 To:inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
20 Fri, 22 July at 12:51 pm
21 Click here to recommend this to your friends
22 Click here to Print or View this Media Release in PDF
23 Australian Citizens Party

24 Media Release Friday, 22 July 2022
25 Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
26 PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
27 Phone: 1800 636 432
28 Email: info@citizensparty.org.au
29 Website: https://citizensparty.org.au
30
31 Exposed! Secretive annual talks influence Australian foreign policy
32 This release was first published as an article in the 20 July 2022 Australian Alert Service.
33 As a nation that “guards” its sovereignty, Australians would be aghast to learn of a foreign influence
34 operation that brings together leading politicians, government officials, journalists, and business
35 executives from Australia and China for secretive annual talks.

Page 24
1 Most Australians would be instinctively suspicious of a forum that, while the event itself is not secret,
2 attracts scant publicity, and the discussions are secret—participants strictly observe rules that prevent
3 them from disclosing the contents of any comments made at the event, even without identifying the
4 speaker; they are only permitted to disclose their own comments.
5 It would enrage Australians to learn that regular participants in this forum publicly sneer at an
6 Australian journalist imprisoned in China, and that the forum was used to plant a fake “spy” story in
7 the Australian media to undermine Australia’s most beneficial international relationship. Australians
8 can be confident that the politicians in Canberra who are strident in their public defence of Australian
9 sovereignty and have made it their mission to combat foreign interference would use the full power of
10 Parliament and foreign interference laws to scrutinise the working of this operation and expose its
11 agenda.
12 Australians would indeed have such reactions, if this scenario were about a foreign interference
13 operation by China. Except it’s not a scenario, and it’s not about Australia and China. It’s a very real,
14 30-year operation influencing Australia and the United States, called the Australian American
15 Leadership Dialogue (AALD). The “dialogue” occurs during an annual junket alternating between the
16 USA and Australia, the latest of which has just wrapped up in Washington DC. If you were wondering
17 why Australia’s bombastic new opposition leader Peter Dutton has been quiet lately, and why he gave
18 an interview to Sky News on Sunday morning with the Washington Capitol building in the
19 background, it’s because he has been on the latest AALD junket to the USA. Underscoring its political
20 importance, the new CEO of the AALD is Tony Smith, the just-retired former Speaker of Australia’s
21 House of Representatives, and its Advisory Board includes Professor Glynn Davis, Prime Minister
22 Anthony Albanese’s newly appointed Secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, i.e.
23 the head of Australia’s Commonwealth public service.
24 The above description of how the AALD operates is entirely accurate:
25  It involves leading politicians from both countries’ two major parties, government
26 officials, journalists, and business executives, who attend by invitation only;
27  It receives little publicity in proportion to the political firepower it attracts, and its
28 attendees strictly observe its non-disclosures rules, as evidenced by the fact there has
29 been very few leaks in its 30-year history;
30  A journalist who is a regular AALD attendee didn’t sneer at an Australian
31 journalist imprisoned by China, but at Julian Assange imprisoned by the UK at the
32 demand of the USA—ABC News Breakfast co-presenter Michael Rowland tweeted “A
33 big gold star to Ecuador” when Assange was forcibly removed from Ecuador’s London
34 embassy in 2018, and doubled down by tweeting that people who call Assange a
35 journalist are in “a VERY small camp”;
36  Liberal MP Andrew Hastie revealed he was contacted by an intermediary of a

37 self-proclaimed Chinese spy while at the 2019 Australian American Leadership Dialogue
38 event, which led to a sensational 60 Minutes story about a defecting Chinese spy
39 exposing Chinese espionage in Australia, before the Australian Security Intelligence
40 Organisation (ASIO) confirmed the claims were fake.
41 The AALD is the brainchild of then Coca-Cola Amatil CEO Phil Scanlan, an Australian business
42 executive with an American wife, who also had a background in politics as advisor to leading Liberal
43 Party identity Peter Coleman (a Cold War ideological warrior and the father-in-law of Peter Costello).
44 In his 2019 book The US Lobby and Australian Defence Policy, author Vince Scappatura reports that
45 Scanlan confessed to a deep-seated fear that following the end of the Cold War, he “would wake up
46 one morning and find that the US has declared independence from Australia”.

Page 25
1 Scanlan proposed his idea to US President George H.W. Bush during Bush’s 1991 visit to Australia,
2 and Bush backed it. Scanlan’s goal for AALD was to strengthen the alliance between the two nations,
3 or, more specifically, to strengthen the alliance as the foundation of Australia’s foreign policy, through
4 “relationship management between current and likely future leaders from both countries”, according to
5 the AALD website.
6 The attendees of the very first dialogue in 1993, held in Washington DC, included future PM Kevin
7 Rudd, journalist Greg Sheridan, Nick Greiner, and then-US Defence Secretary Dick Cheney and his
8 Under Secretary Paul Wolfowitz—the criminal conspirators behind the Iraq war—who the previous
9 year had enunciated the strategic doctrine that America’s post-Cold War foreign and defence policies
10 would focus on stopping the rise of any rival military or economic power, i.e. China. The AALD is
11 committed to supporting this doctrine, by acting as a channel to communicate to Washington decision-
12 makers a supposedly homogeneous Australian desire that America remain “engaged” in the Asia-
13 Pacific.
14 In a 10 November 2016 ABC 7.30 interview, former Australian PM Paul Keating blamed the AALD
15 for making Australian politicians of both parties subservient to the US alliance:
16 “We’ve got into this almost sort of crazy position now where the American alliance, instead of simply
17 being a treaty, where the United States is obliged to consult with us in the event of adverse strategic
18 circumstances, it has now taken on a reverential, sacramental quality”, Keating said. “It’s like a
19 sacrament. I’m not talking about simply the government; I’m talking about some people on the Labor
20 side as well.
21 “There’s a view, there was a thing called the Australian-American dialogue, which by the way I never
22 attended, which is a sort of a cult thing that’s gone on for years and I don’t know what the Americans
23 put in the drinking water, but whenever the Australians come back, they’re all bowing and scraping
24 and going on.” (Emphasis added.)
25 What Keating describes goes a long way towards explaining why new PM Anthony Albanese, one of
26 many Labor participants in the AALD, is barely different from his predecessor. Meanwhile, nothing
27 China has been accused of in terms of foreign interference comes close to the influence the AALD has
28 over Australian foreign policy.
29 Click here to watch an interview about the need for an independent foreign policy to evert
30 war: CITIZENS INSIGHT - New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO Pacific war plan -
31 Matt Robson
32 END QUOTE Email
33
34
35 QUOTE Must watch! New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO Pacific
36 war plan
37 Must watch! New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO Pacific war
38 plan
39 Citizens Party <citizensparty@citizensmail.com.au>
40 To:inspector_rikati@yahoo.com.au
41 Thu, 21 July at 1:51 pm
42 Click here to recommend this to your friends
43 Click here to Print or View this Media Release in PDF

Page 26
1 Australian Citizens Party

2 Media Release Thursday, 21 July 2022
3 Craig Isherwood‚ National Secretary
4 PO Box 376‚ COBURG‚ VIC 3058
5 Phone: 1800 636 432
6 Email: info@citizensparty.org.au
7 Website: https://citizensparty.org.au
8
9 Must watch! New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO Pacific war plan
10 A former New Zealand Cabinet Minister has warned that the actions of Australian Prime Minister
11 Anthony Albanese and New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern in tying their two countries to
12 NATO is pushing the Pacific towards war.
13 Matt Robson was a Cabinet Minister in Helen Clarke’s Labour-led Coalition government, and served
14 as NZ’s Minister for Disarmament and Associate Minister for Foreign Affairs, with intimate
15 knowledge of Pacific affairs.
16 He is also a barrister with extensive experience in international law.
17 In a striking new interview with the Australian Citizens Party’s Citizens Insight program on YouTube,
18 Matt Robson takes on the manufactured consensus regarding supposedly virtuous NATO standing
19 against authoritarian Russia and China, which is being used to undermine NZ’s commitment to
20 banning nuclear weapons and an independent foreign policy, and turn Australia and NZ into
21 extensions of NATO in the Asia-Pacific, for confronting China.
22 For Australia, Anthony Albanese is continuing his predecessor’s policies, which is bad enough,
23 demonstrating Australia’s complete lack of independence on foreign policy; for NZ however, Ardern
24 is actually destroying her country’s foreign policy principles, including its independent commitment to
25 nuclear disarmament, by taking NZ under NATO’s nuclear umbrella.
26 To see a NZ statesman say what no serving major party politician in Australia or New Zealand would
27 be game to say today, click here to watch CITIZENS INSIGHT - New Zealand Statesman denounces
28 Five-Eyes/NATO Pacific war plan - Matt Robson
29 https://cec.enudgemail.com.au/securl.php?nudge=y907zpr48701&link=11120&email=inspector_rikati
30 @yahoo.com.au
31 The interview covers:
32  Matt Robson’s qualified legal opinion on whether Russia’s actions in Ukraine

33 were “unprovoked”—the excuse for siding with NATO;
34  What it means legally that Australia and NZ have sided with NATO and supplied
35 weapons to Ukraine;
36  Why NZ developed an independent foreign policy which is now being abandoned

37 by Ardern;
38  The political backlash in NZ to Ardern’s policy;

39  China’s actions in the Pacific, and the hypocrisy of Australia and NZ in
40 pressuring Pacific Island nations not to deal with China;
41  The current Australia-NZ-US meddling in the Pacific, including targeting some

42 Pacific Island nations’ governments for “regime change”;

Page 27
1  NZ’s intelligence agencies and defence apparatus, which operates under the Five
2 Eyes partnership with the UK, USA, Australia, and Canada, and how it is an anti-
3 democratic force opposing the will of New Zealanders to have an independent foreign
4 policy;
5  How Australia and NZ’s strong and beneficial trade relationships with China are a
6 foundation for peace, and a reason both countries should act in their own independent
7 national interest.
8 Matt Robson’s courage to speak out is backed by his experience, going all the way back to his
9 activism as a university student opposing the Vietnam War.
10 He explains he is not intimidated by smears of being a “Putin apologist” or “Chinese agent”, because
11 he’s heard it all before, during the Vietnam war, when anyone who spoke out was accused of being an
12 agent of “Moscow” or “Beijing”.
13 Matt Robson also gives a ringing endorsement of the late former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm
14 Fraser’s forceful view that Australia should assert its independence from the USA and UK, and
15 Fraser’s 2014 book Dangerous Allies, which exposes how Australia’s alliance with the UK and USA
16 has always dragged us into foreign wars.
17 The way that more and more people with seniority and experience in foreign affairs—like Matt
18 Robson, and like former Australian Ambassador John Lander, who was interviewed on Citizens
19 Insight on 31 March 2022 and on 9 May 2022 (click the hyperlinks to watch)—are speaking out to
20 warn that it is the policies being pursued by our governments that are leading to war, should alarm all
21 Australians and New Zealanders.
22 It is time to heed these warnings, and use our voices to tell our political leaders to stop the insanity,
23 and adopt independent foreign policies that are in our national interests.
24 Click here to watch CITIZENS INSIGHT - New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO
25 Pacific war plan - Matt Robson
26
27 END QUOTE Must watch! New Zealand Statesman denounces Five-Eyes/NATO
28 Pacific war plan
29
30 http://differentbugle.blogspot.com/2022/07/russian-missiles-in-mexico-as-mexico.html
31 Chris Sullivan: Russian Missiles In Mexico As Mexico Joins SATO (differentbugle.blogspot.com)
32 CHRIS SULLIVAN
33 "TRAIN YOURS EL F TO I ND IFFERENCE ABOUT SO URCES . TRUTH ALONE HAS A
34 CL AIM , AND IT HAS THAT CL AIM WHEREVER IT APP EARS ." ANTO NIN G IL B ERT
35 S ERTILL ANGES , O.P .
36 TUESDAY, JULY 19, 2022
37 Russian Missiles In Mexico As Mexico Joins SATO

38
39 Well one can expect that the Russian Federation decided that with NATO expanding in violation
40 to the Minsk and other agreements then well let the USA and others also feel the heat.
41
42 In my view it was not only utter foolish but utterly stupid and a violation of our constitution for
43 the Federal government to get involved in the Ukraine dispute when it never even bothered to
44 obtain authority from the Governor-General and neither did it show any real concern over the
45 last 8 years when the Ukraine NAZI government was bombarding Donbass and mass murdering
46 more than 134,000 reported Ukrainians. Where was the humanitarian aid then for the victims in
47 Donbass?
Page 28
1 In the meantime:
2
3 https://cairnsnews.org/2022/07/22/military-tanks-protect-chinese-banks-which-are-now-
4 keeping-private-deposits-as-usd-sinks-under-the-waves/
5 Military tanks protect Chinese banks which are now keeping private deposits as USD
6 sinks under the waves
7
8 And with this warmongering the following article also should be considered:
9
10 https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/no_author/the-world-needs-russian-oil-and-gas/
11 Russian Oil and Gas
12 QUOTE
13 By Patrick Foy
14 July 23, 2022
15 It’s the second-raters that stir up hell; first-rate people wouldn’t.—
16 Dorothy Parker
17 As I recall, “blowback” was defined by the CIA as the unintended and/or
18 unforeseen adverse consequences of U.S foreign policy. We can certainly
19 see that in Washington’s current adventure in Ukraine. In fact, this may be
20 the supreme example to date, and there has been quite a track record, as
21 noticed by cognoscenti who follow such things.
22 Let’s start from ground zero. Vlad Putin did not roll out of bed one morning
23 and decide to order Russia’s armed forces to invade innocent, hapless
24 Ukraine. It is not even necessary to be a foreign affairs cognoscenti to
25 realize that this entire affair has “made in Washington” written all over it.
26 In the immediate run-up to Prez Putin throwing up his hands, one could
27 almost casually observe that Washington was doing everything it could
28 (while loudly proclaiming just the opposite) to ensure that no negotiations
29 would be entered into between Moscow, Kiev and their next door neighbors
30 in Europe.
31 After all, please remember that Washington had already shown its hand by
32 slamming the door on the 2014-15 Minsk accords. It simply instructed its
33 European vassals to walk away from the signed-and-delivered Minsk II,
34 and let things slide.
35 This annoying fact alone would give Vlad pause about negotiating with the
36 Europeans or Kiev. À quoi bon? Washington’s meddling foreign-policy
37 officialdom was always lurking in the background with a monkey-wrench.
38 Now comes this instructive item via Hong Kong, the South China Morning
39 Post, alerting us to a hilarious and egregious blowback from Washington’s
40 triumphal post-invasion sanction regime. If Washington’s demands about
41 boycotting Russian oil had actually been followed, then Europe and the
42 U.S. would be in even worse shape than they currently are!
43 END QUOTE
44
45 Video: “The UN Admits The Unthinkable & Immediately Initiates Damage
46 Control…Here’s What They Said!”
47
Page 29
3
4
5 Again:
6 https://10play.com.au/theproject/articles/anthony-albanese-condemns-scott-morrisons-anti-
7 government-sermon-calling-it-nonsense/tpa220721jdgtm
8 QUOTE
9 Anthony Albanese Condemns Scott Morrison’s Anti-Government Sermon Calling It
10 “Nonsense”
11
Page 30
1 21 Jul 2022
2 (IMAGE NOT REPRODUCED)
3 Prime minister Anthony Albanese states he found Scott Morrison’s comments about the
4 UN and government during a church sermon “astonishing” “nonsense” and unworthy of
5 someone who led Australia.
6 Scott Morrison, the former Prime Minister of Australia visited the opening of Tennis
7 Player, Margaret Court’s Victory Life Centre church in Perth.
8 During the visit he hosted a sermon where he made a number of points about the lack of
9 trust he has in the government and world leaders.
10 Stating: “We don’t trust in governments. We don’t trust in the United Nations.
11 Thank goodness.”
12 “We don’t trust in all of these things, fine as they might be, and as important a role as they
13 play.
14 Believe me, I’ve worked in it, and they are important but as someone who’s been in it, if
15 you are putting your faith in those things like I put my faith in the Lord, you are making a
16 mistake. They’re earthly. They are fallible. I’m so glad we have a bigger hope.”
17 Speaking to ABC breakfast Albanese shared his thoughts on Morrison’s statements.

18 “I just thought, wow. This guy was the prime minister of Australia and had that great
19 honour of leading the government. I found it quite astonishing”
20 It provides some explanation perhaps of why, in my view, he clearly didn’t lead a

21 government that was worthy of the Australian people – he said he doesn’t believe in
22 government.
23 The idea that he’s out there and pressing the United Nations button ... I’ve spent two
24 months trying to repair our international relations and that sort of nonsense,
25 throwaway, conspiracy line about the United Nations I think isn’t worthy of someone
26 who led Australia.”
27 END QUOTE
28
29 Well, it must be clear that the U.N. is in favour to have people suffering hunger so they will be
30 more likely work for little as after all its “partner” the W.E.F. (World Economic Forum) desires
31 that “You own nothing and be happy” and get rid of what it considers “useless eaters”.
32
33 And let us not ignore the involvement of the W.H.O. (world health Organisation) in bio-
34 laboratories in Ukraine where research has been ongoing to make pathogens more deadly.
35
36 In this instance I view that Scott Morrison let the cat out of the bag, but regretfully didn’t do so
37 when in government.
38
39 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all issues.
40 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Friends call me Gerrit)
41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

42 (Our name is our motto!)

Complaint: Commissioner@afp - Gov.au Acv@health - Gov.au Committees@health - Gov.au

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Complaint: Commissioner@afp - Gov.au Acv@health - Gov.au Committees@health - Gov.au

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

7 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: No!

20 Sir SAMUEL GRIFFITH: No!

1 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution convention Debates

22 The Hon. E. BARTON: Not to be trusted, prima facie!

24 The Hon. E. BARTON: If the definition of a point is a thing of no magnitude, it is not a

1 exercised by our fellow-countrymen in Great Britain itself. Australia is entitled to

25-7-2022 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

4 Speaking to ABC breakfast Albanese shared his thoughts on Morrison’s statements.

7 It provides some explanation perhaps of why, in my view, he clearly didn’t lead a

25-7-2022 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 An executive, consisting of a governor-general, and such persons as may from time

50 Mr. DEAKIN.-It is made for the lawyers under this clause.

25-7-2022 Page 11 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 If you say "Trust the Parliament," no Constitution is required at all ; it can

25-7-2022 Page 12 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

27 Mr. HIGGINS.-Why not?

1 Hansard 6-3-1891 Constitution Convention Debates

25-7-2022 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

25-7-2022 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

25-7-2022 Page 17 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

47 Mr. KINGSTON.-That is the reservation clause.

25-7-2022 Page 19 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

24 2) A war of the USA, in order to subjugate EU-Europe further to their subordination.

26 4) A war to demonstrate “NATO or US superiority over China”(18).

40 From 2015, NATO’s maneuver frequency (such as DEFENDER 20/21) on Russia’s

20 Fri, 22 July at 12:51 pm

21 Click here to recommend this to your friends

22 Click here to Print or View this Media Release in PDF

23 Australian Citizens Party

25-7-2022 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

24 The above description of how the AALD operates is entirely accurate:

36  Liberal MP Andrew Hastie revealed he was contacted by an intermediary of a

25-7-2022 Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

41 Thu, 21 July at 1:51 pm

42 Click here to recommend this to your friends

43 Click here to Print or View this Media Release in PDF

25-7-2022 Page 25 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Australian Citizens Party

31 The interview covers:

32  Matt Robson’s qualified legal opinion on whether Russia’s actions in Ukraine

36  Why NZ developed an independent foreign policy which is now being abandoned

38  The political backlash in NZ to Ardern’s policy;

41  The current Australia-NZ-US meddling in the Pacific, including targeting some

25-7-2022 Page 26 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

37 Russian Missiles In Mexico As Mexico Joins SATO

17 Speaking to ABC breakfast Albanese shared his thoughts on Morrison’s statements.

20 It provides some explanation perhaps of why, in my view, he clearly didn’t lead a

41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like