PEAL PARAGRAPHS 21B

Read McKay pp. 691-703

Directions:
 After reading the pages listed above, complete your PEAL paragraph(s).
 Paragraphs should be concise and precise, yet thought-provoking. Avoid story-telling.
 Type your answers in this file.
o Save the assignment to your file sharing account.
o Submit on canvas.
o Print the assignment for your unit study guide.
 Color-code each paragraph.
o Blue = Point
o Green = Evidence
o Red = Analysis
o Purple = Link
o Orange = measure of most important

Point Evidence Analysis

 Use your THESIS  Evidence = TERMS from the  Focus your analysis on connecting
FRAMES to chapter (dates, names, events, your points to the question’s topic
model clear etc.) that you would use to to broader historical trends.
concise points. prove your points.
Suggested prompts:
 This is important because…
 This connects to…
 One should consider that…
 This is ironic because…
 Ideologically, this reflects…
 Contrary to what one might
think…

Use the follow thesis frame when…

1. Writing the answer to a ‘Why’ question.
 “(RE-ASSERT THE PREMISE OF THE QUESTION) in order to… (INSERT POINT 1 AND
YOUR EXPLICITLY-STATED ‘MOST IMPORTANT’ POINT 2).”

2. Writing the answer to a ‘To what extent’ question.

 “Overall, despite (INSERT COUNTERPOINT), (RE-ASSERT THE PREMISE OF THE
QUESTION) by (INSERT POINT 1 AND YOUR EXPLICITLY-STATED ‘MOST IMPORTANT’
POINT 2).”
21B PEAL PARAGRAPHS

Write one color-coded PEAL paragraph for each of the following questions.

1. To what extent did capitalism have a greater impact on mid-19th century Europe than socialism?
 Overall, despite the subsidization of citizens in the workplace during mid-19th century Europe aiding
railway companies’ capitalism played a greater impact on Europe because it changed production and
most importantly changed how people lived and worked. Subsidization of citizens was incredibly
integral to the citizens of Europe because it aided them in becoming more economically prosperous
while still working for aid. Aid was not as common in capitalism; however, it changed the production
field in the mid-19th century Europe. The industrial capitalism in Europe was peaking in production
fields as businesses were becoming more prosperous because of government aid and, the current
increase in economical successes. The way people lived and worked was changed by the successes of
their production fields which in return created a more healthy, normal life for mort European citizens.
St. Simon created worker protection which can in return create a safer, and in advanced more
prosperous work environment for capitalism to grow further. Altogether, capitalism had a greater
impact on mid-19th century Europe because it changed production and changed how people lived and
worked even though socialism created subsidization for workers.

2. To what extent did nationalism fuel European revolutions in the 19th century?
 Overall, despite the idea of nationalism creating plausible actions who established a negative
environment for 19th century, Europe fueled European revolutions by creating less tax revenue and
more importantly creating more class consciousness. Nationalism has possible situations in which
citizens fear socialism and is also threatening of the life Metternich finds successful for running France.
As Metternich hates France it is found plausible that Nationalism will not fuel revolutions as leaders of
Europe and soldiers Metternich is capable of enforcing will prevent any wars. European Revolutions
can still thrive and form because nationalism creates less tax revenue in European countries which in
return creates an opportunity for more war and revolutions in Europe. The Ottoman state became
increasingly powerful and rationalized during the 19th century for tax revenue which began to decrease
in this century. This creates many opportunities for revolution and war in this state. More importantly,
class consciousness began to thrive in 19th century creating division among the people and bring
Marxism into a more dominant position. It is to the greatest belief of citizens that if not in their class it
is best to fight which creates another opportunity in which war is the best option. Revolution was
overall fueled by nationalism because financial stability was instituted and more importantly brought
upon class consciousness across Europe.

3. To what extent did the views of Utopian Socialists differ from Marxists (Revolutionary Socialists)?
 Overall, despite the fact that Utopian Socialists and Marxists both view people as and economic unit,
the Socialists differ because the morals of the different societies are incredibly differing in views of
citizens and more importantly the working expectations change depending on the social views of the
society. Both Marxism and Utopian Socialists agreed in their beliefs that people are merely economic
units, to create a more direct standpoint to their appreciation of the working-class individuals. Also, St.
Simon was one of the many Utopians Socialist that had strong beliefs about their socialist party. He
helped the working class and protected them from working situations that were difficult to manage. The
morals were incredible differing in beliefs as Marxism was more advocating over killing rich citizens as
a aid to helping the lower class (or themselves as the Marxists). The Utopian Socialists were much
more radical in their beliefs as they weren’t as focused on killing for other advantages. The working
expectations for Marxism was much more problematic as they weren’t as caring as some of the citizens
in the Utopian Society previously discussed. Overall, Utopian Socialists differ from Revolutionary
Socialists by differing morals and also the working class situational expectations.