Group 45 Portion Care Caps2

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES
1338 Arlegui St., Quiapo, Manila
College of Engineering and Architecture

Department of Civil Engineering
A Capstone Design (CE 509 – CE Projects II)

Presented to the Faculty of Civil Engineering
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the

Degree of Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
PORTION CARE:
A PROPOSED 5 STOREY GREEN
BUILDING HOSPITAL WITH
WATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
AND BIOMIMETIC WIND CONVERTER
Agorilla, Paolo M.
Alcantara, Jadel A.
Barrientos, Jess Erwin C.
Hipolito, Claire Jasmin A.
Paynor, Jazzlene A.
Poblete, Laica T.
October 2021
Approval Sheet
The design project entitled “PORTION CARE: A PROPOSED 5 STOREY GREEN BUILDING
HOSPITAL WITH WATER HARVESTING SYSTEM AND BIOMIMETIC WIND
CONVERTER” prepared by Paolo M. Agorilla, Jadel A. Alcantara, Jess Erwin C. Barrientos, Claire
Jasmin A. Hipolito, Jazzlene A. Paynor and Laica T. Poblete of the Civil Engineering Department was
examined and evaluated by the members of the Student Design Evaluation Panel and is hereby
recommended for approval.
Engr. Charmaine Kay Guanlao Engr. Rolls Grant Vasquez

Capstone 2 Adviser Capstone 2 Coordinator
Approved by the Committee on Oral Examination with a final grade of ______.
Engr. Jomari Tan

Lead Panelist
Panelist, Engr. Jovelyn Argete Panelist, Engr. Judy Ann Lipata
Dr. Gerardo C. Malab

CE Chairperson, Department of Civil Engineering
Dr. Marianne L. Yumul EE, Asean Engr

Dean, College of Engineering and Architecture
Table of Contents
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1
1.1 THE PROJECT BACKGROUND 1
1.2 LOCATION MAP 2
1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES 4
1.4 THE CLIENT 5
1.5 SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS 7
CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUTS 8
2.1 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 8
2.1.1 VICINITY MAP 8
2.1.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 9
2.1.3 3D PERSPECTIVE 10
2.1.4 FLOOR PLANS 12
2.1.5 ELEVATIONS 19
2.1.6 SECTIONS 23
2.2 STRUCTURAL SCHEMATIC PLANS 25
2.2.1 FOUNDATION PLAN 29
2.2.2 STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLANS 30
2.2.3 INITIAL MEMBER SIZES 43
CHAPTER 3: PROJECT DESIGN 62
3.1 DESIGN CRITERIA 62
3.1.1 CODES, STANDARDS, AND REFERENCES 62
3.1.2 COMPUTER SOFTWARE’S APPLICATION 62
3.1.3 MATERIALS AND SPECIFICATIONS 64
3.1.4 DESIGN LOADS 65
3.1.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS 71
3.2 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL 72
3.2.1 3D GEOMETRICAL MODEL 72
3.2.2 BASE SUPPORT CONNECTIONS MODEL STRUCTURAL 74
3.2.3 FRAMING PLANS ON MODEL 75
3.2.4 ELEVATION VIEWS ON MODEL 87
3.2.5 MATERIAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT INPUTS 95
3.2.6 FRAME SECTION PROPERTY INPUTS 101
3.2.7 STIFFNESS MODIFIER FACTORS INPUTS 105
3.2.8 ASSIGNMENT OF REALEASE 111
3.3 LOAD COMPUTATION 116
3.3.1 LOAD APPLICATION ON MODEL 116
3.3.2 DEAD LOAD BY SELF-WEIGHT 130
3.3.3 LIVE LOAD 138
3.3.4 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD 141
3.3.5 SEISMIC ANALYSIS 147
3.3.6 WIND LOAD 166
3.4 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS 175
3.4.1 SOIL REPORT 175
3.4.2 SOIL BEARING 186
3.4.3 CONCLUSION 186
3.5 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT FLOW CHART 187
3.6 FRAME ANALYSIS 188
3.6.1 IRREGULARITY CHECK 188
3.6.2 MODAL ANALYSIS 190
3.6.3 DESIGN FLOWCHART FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (USD) AND
STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (LRFD AND ASD) 198
3.7 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (USD) 200
3.7.1 SLAB 200
3.7.1A SLABS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD) 200
3.7.1B DESIGN CALCULATION 202
3.7.2 BEAM 204
3.7.2A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD) 204
3.7.3 COLUMN 213
3.7.3A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD) 213
3.8 STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (ASD) 220
3.8.1 BEAM 220
3.8.1A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (ASD) 220
3.8.2 COLUMN 227
3.8.2A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (ASD) 227
3.9 STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (LRFD) 234
3.9.1 BEAM 234
3.9.1A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (LRFD) 234
3.9.2 COLUMN 241
3.9.2A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (LRFD) 241
3.10 SHEARWALL DESIGN 248
3.11 FOUNDATION DESIGN 248
3.11.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN FLOWCHART 248
3.11.2 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL 249
3.11.2A GEOMETRICAL MODEL 249
3.11.2B MATERIAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT INPUTS 250
3.11.2C SHELL SECTION PROPERTY INPUTS 253
3.11.3 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL 254
3.11.4 BEARING PRESSURE CHECK BY GRAVITY LOADS 255
3.11.5 BEARING PRESSURE CHECK BY TRANSIENT LOADS 258
3.11.6 FOOTING DESIGN RESULTS 261
3.12 SERVICEABILITY CHECK 264
3.12.1 DRIFT CHECK 265
3.12.2 DEFLECTION CHECK 271
CHAPTER 4: CONSTRAINTS, STANDARDS, AND TRADEOFFS 287
4.1 INNOVATION 287
4.2 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS 293
4.2A STRENGTH CHECK 293
4.2B SERVICEABILITY CHECK 297
4.2C ECONOMIC COST 304
4.2D SUSTAINABILITY 310
4.2E ENVIRONMENTAL 311
4.3 TRADEOFFS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS 313
4.4 CODES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRAINTS 322
4.5 OVERALL WINNING DESIGN 323
CHAPTER 5: FINAL DESIGN 324
5.1 EXECUIVE SUMMARY 324
5.2 FINAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS 326
APPENDICES 328
List of Tables
Table 2.1: Minimum thickness of Solid Non-Prestressed One-way Slabs .......................................... 43

Table 2.2: Preliminary Slab Sizes of First Floor to Roof Deck ........................................................... 44
Table 2.3: Minimum depth of Non-Prestressed Beams ....................................................................... 45
Table 2.4: Preliminary Beam Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck .......................................................... 48
Table 2.5: Tabulated Wall Loads ......................................................................................................... 49
Table 2.6: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads ............................................................. 49
Table 2.7: Tabulated Pressure Loads ................................................................................................... 49
Table 2.8: Preliminary Column Sizes of Basement to Roof Deck ...................................................... 52
Table 2.9: Preliminary Footing Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck....................................................... 53
Table 2.10: Preliminary Steel Beam Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck ............................................... 56
Table 2.11: Preliminary Steel Column Sizes of Basement to Roof Deck ........................................... 61
Table 3.1: Tabulated Material Specifications for RC .......................................................................... 64
Table 3.2: Tabulated Material Specifications for Steel ....................................................................... 64
Table 3.3: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Basement ........................................................ 130
Table 3.4: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Second Floor to Third Floor ........................... 130
Table 3.5: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Fourth Floor to Fifth Floor ............................. 131
Table 3.6: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from First or Ground Floor ......................................... 132
Table 3.7: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Second to Third Floor ........................................ 133
Table 3.8: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Fourth to Fifth Floor........................................... 134
Table 3.9: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Roof Deck .......................................................... 135
Table 3.10: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Ground Floor ...................................................... 136
Table 3.11: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Second to Third Floor......................................... 136
Table 3.12: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Fourth to Fifth Floor ........................................... 137
Table 3.13: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Roof Deck........................................................... 137
Table 3.14: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Basement .............. 138
Table 3.15: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Ground Floor ........ 138
Table 3.16: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Second Floor......... 139
Table 3.17: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Third Floor ........... 139
Table 3.18: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Fourth Floor .......... 140
Table 3.19: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Fifth Floor............. 140
Table 3.20: Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Special Loads of Roof Deck............. 141
Table 3.21: Tabulated Pressure Loads ............................................................................................... 141
Table 3.22: Tabulated Wall Loads of Ground Floor.......................................................................... 143
Table 3.23: Tabulated Wall Loads of Second to Third Floor ............................................................ 144
Table 3.24: Tabulated Wall Loads of Fourth to Fifth Floor .............................................................. 146
Table 3.25: Tabulated Total Weight of Floor Levels ........................................................................ 146
Table 3.26: Total Dead Load Calculations in ETABS ...................................................................... 146
Table 3.27: Seismic Source Type ...................................................................................................... 150
Table 3.28: Seismic Zone Factor ....................................................................................................... 150
Table 3.29: Occupancy Category ....................................................................................................... 154
Table 3.30: Seismic Importance Factors ............................................................................................ 155
Table 3.31: Soil Profile Types ........................................................................................................... 155
Table 3.32: Near-Source Factor, Na1 ................................................................................................. 156
Table 3.33: Near-Source Factor, Nv 1................................................................................................. 156
Table 3.34: Seismic Coefficient, Ca .................................................................................................. 157
Table 3.35: Seismic Coefficient, Cv .................................................................................................. 157
Table 3.36: Earthquake-Force-Resisting Structural Systems of Concrete......................................... 159
Table 3.37: Earthquake-Force-Resisting Structural Systems of Steel ............................................... 161
Table 3.38: Tabulated Seismic Load Parameters ............................................................................... 162
Tables 3.39-40: Calculated Design Base Shear in ETABS ............................................................... 164
Table 3.41: Tabulated Vertical Distributions for Reinforced Concrete ............................................. 165
Table 3.42: Tabulated Design Response Spectra Coordinate .............. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Table 3.43: Wind Directionality Factor, Kd ...................................................................................... 169
Table 3.44: Internal Pressure Coefficients, (GCpi) ............................................................................ 171
Table 3.45: Tabulated Wind Load Parameters .................................................................................. 171
Table 3.46: Terrain Exposure Constants ............................................................................................ 172
Table 3.47: Wall Pressure Coefficients ............................................................................................. 172
Table 3.48: Tabulated Structural Geometry....................................................................................... 172
Table 3.49: Tabulated Wall Pressure Coefficients ............................................................................ 173
Table 3.50: Wind Load Calculation in ETABS ................................................................................. 173
Table 3.51: Tabulated Results of Wind Load Calculations ............................................................... 174
List of Figures
Figure 1.1: Shows the project location’s satellite view from google earth ............................................ 2
Figure 1.2: Shows the close-up plan of the proposed project’s location ............................................... 3
Figure 1.3: Shows the elevation of the project’s location from the topographic map.. ......................... 3
Figure 1.4: Shows measurement of the proposed lot’s project.. ............................................................ 4
Figure 2.1: Shows the landmarks surroundings the project’s location. ................................................. 8
Figure 2.2: Site Development Plan ........................................................................................................ 9
Figure 2.3: Perspective of proposed project ........................................................................................ 10
Figure 2.4: Perspective of proposed project ........................................................................................ 11
Figure 2.5: Basement Floor Plan. ........................................................................................................ 12
Figure 2.6: Ground Floor Plan ............................................................................................................. 13
Figure 2.7: 2nd Floor Plan..................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 2.8: 3rd Floor Plan ..................................................................................................................... 15
Figure 2.9: 4th Floor Plan ..................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 2.10: 5th Floor Plan .................................................................................................................. 17
Figure 2.11: Roof Deck Floor Plan ...................................................................................................... 18
Figure 2.12: Front View Elevation ...................................................................................................... 19
Figure 2.13: Rear View Elevation ....................................................................................................... 20
Figure 2.14: Right View Elevation ...................................................................................................... 21
Figure 2.15: Left View Elevation ........................................................................................................ 22
Figure 2.16: Longitudinal Section ....................................................................................................... 23
Figure 2.17: Cross Section ................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 2.18: Foundation Plan............................................................................................................... 29
Figure 2.19: First Floor Framing Plan. ................................................................................................ 30
Figure 2.20: Typical Second and Third Floor Framing Plan. .............................................................. 31
Figure 2.21: Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Framing Plan. ................................................................... 32
Figure 2.22: Roof Deck Framing Plan. ................................................................................................ 33
Figure 2.23: Ground Floor Slab Designation Plan............................................................................... 34
Figure 2.24: Typical Second and Third Floor Slab Designation Plan. ................................................ 35
Figure 2.25: Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Slab Designation Plan. ..................................................... 36
Figure 2.26: Roof Deck Slab Designation Plan. .................................................................................. 37
Figure 2.27: Basement Column Plan. .................................................................................................. 38
Figure 2.28: First Floor Column Plan. ................................................................................................. 39
Figure 2.29: Typical Second and Third Floor Column Plan................................................................ 40
Figure 2.30: Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Column Plan..................................................................... 41
Figure 2.31: Roof Deck Column Plan.................................................................................................. 42
Figure 3.1: First Floor Wall Loading Plan. .......................................................................................... 65
Figure 3.2: Typical Second to Third Floor Wall Loading Plan. .......................................................... 66
Figure 3.3: Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Wall Loading Plan. ............................................................ 67
Figure 3.4: First Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan. ...................................................................... 68
Figure 3.5: Typical Second to Third Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan. ....................................... 69
Figure 3.6: Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan. ......................................... 70
Figure 3.7: 3D Geometrical Model for Reinforced Concrete Structure .............................................. 72
Figure 3.8: 3D Geometrical Model for Steel Structure........................................................................ 73
Figure 3.9: Foundation Level ............................................................................................................... 74
Figure 3.10: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Basement ........................................... 75
Figure 3.11: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for First Floor .......................................... 76
Figure 3.12: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Second and Third Floor ..................... 77
Figure 3.13: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Fourth Floor ...................................... 78
Figure 3.14: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Fifth Floor and Roof Deck ................ 79
Figure 3.15: Reinforced Concrete Structure Column Designation ...................................................... 80
Figure 3.16: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Basement .................................................................... 81
Figure 3.17: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Ground Floor .............................................................. 82
Figure 3.18: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Second and Third Floor .............................................. 83
Figure 3.19: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Fourth Floor ................................................................ 84
Figure 3.20: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Fifth Floor................................................................... 85
Figure 3.21: Steel Concrete Structure Column Designation ................................................................ 86
Figure 3.22: Reinforced Concrete Structure Front View ..................................................................... 87
Figure 3.23: Reinforced Concrete Structure Rear View ...................................................................... 88
Figure 3.24: Reinforced Concrete Structure Left View ....................................................................... 89
Figure 3.25: Reinforced Concrete Structure Right View..................................................................... 90
Figure 3.26: Steel Structure Front View .............................................................................................. 91
Figure 3.27: Steel Structure Rear View ............................................................................................... 92
Figure 3.28: Steel Structure Left View ................................................................................................ 93
Figure 3.29: Steel Structure Right View .............................................................................................. 94
Figure 3.30: Concrete Material Properties ........................................................................................... 95
Figure 3.31: Steel Material Properties ................................................................................................. 96
Figure 3.32: Slab Material Properties .................................................................................................. 97
Figures 3.33-34: Slab Property Modifiers ........................................................................................... 98
Figures 3.35-36: Beam Property Modifiers ....................................................................................... 100
Figure 3.37: Restraints Joint Assignment .......................................................................................... 100
Figures 3.38-39: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Beams ...................... 101
Figures 3.40-41: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Columns .................. 102
Figures 3.42-43: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Steel Beams ............. 103
Figures 3.44-45: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Steel Columns ......... 104
Figure 3.46: Stiffness Modification Factors of Concrete Beams ....................................................... 105
Figure 3.47: Stiffness Modification Factors of Concrete Columns ................................................... 106
Figure 3.48: Stiffness Modification Factors of Slabs ........................................................................ 107
Figure 3.49: Stiffness Modification Factors of Steel Beams ............................................................. 108
Figure 3.50: Stiffness Modification Factors of Steel Columns.......................................................... 109
Figure 3.51: Stiffness Modification Factors of Walls ........................................................................ 110
Figure 3.52: Assignment of Release .................................................................................................. 111
Figure 3.53: Assignment of Moment of Release ............................................................................... 112
Figure 3.54: P-Delta Inputs ................................................................................................................ 113
Figure 3.55: Property Modifiers for Beams ....................................................................................... 114
Figure 3.56: Property Modifiers for Columns ................................................................................... 115
Figure 3.57: Application of Displaced Dead Load on Model ............................................................ 117
Figure 3.58: Application of Displaced Superimposed Dead Load on Model .................................... 117
Figure 3.59: Application of Displaced Live Load on Model ............................................................. 118
Figure 3.60: Application of Displaced Seismic Load along X-Direction on Model ......................... 119
Figure 3.61: Application of Displaced Seismic Load along Y-Direction on Model ......................... 120
Figure 3.62: Seismic Load Pattern ..................................................................................................... 121
Figure 3.63: Application of Displaced Wind Load along X-Direction on Model ............................. 122
Figure 3.64: Application of Displaced Wind Load along Y-Direction on Model ............................. 123
Figure 3.65: Wind Load Pattern......................................................................................................... 124
Figure 3.66: Wind Exposure Width Data .......................................................................................... 125
Figure 3.67: Moment Diagram of Applied Loads on Model ............................................................. 126
Figure 3.68: Torsion Diagram of Applied Loads on Model .............................................................. 127
Figure 3.69: Axial Force Diagram of Applied Loads on Model........................................................ 128
Figure 3.70: Shear Force Diagram of Applied Loads on Model ....................................................... 129
Figure 3.71: Seismic Analysis Flowchart .......................................................................................... 147
Figure 3.72: Seismic Map for determining Zone Factor.................................................................... 151
Figure 3.73: Philippine Map as seen in PHILVOLCS Fault Finder .................................................. 152
Figure 3.74: Design Response Spectra Coordinate.............................. Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 3.75: Wind Analysis Flowchart .............................................................................................. 166
Figure 3.76: Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category I Building and other Structures ............. 168
Figure 3.77: Geotechnical Investigation from DPWH Region IV-A. 1st Page .................................. 176
Figure 3.78: Geotechnical Investigation from DPWH Region IV-A. 2nd Page ................................. 177
Figure 3.79: Geotechnical Investigation from DPWH Region IV-A. 3rd Page ................................. 178
Figure 3.80: Geotechnical Investigation from DPWH Region IV-A. 4th Page.................................. 179
Figure 3.86: Geotechnical Investigation from DPWH Region IV-A. 10th Page................................ 185
Figure 3.87: Design Development Flow Chart .................................................................................. 187
CE CAPSTONE 2 CHAPTER 1
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 THE PROJECT BACKGROUND
As Covid-19 cases rises in the Philippines, so as the lack of health care facilities. The demand
for hospital are increasing at a faster rate, but the hospitals in the Philippines is at low level in this
time. Another issue that the world is facing is the issue about the growing crises in the global climate
change. The researchers, conceptualize an idea of building a new hospital that care for the people and
can help lessen the harm to the environment.
The purpose of this project is to design a 5-storey green building hospital with a water
harvesting system and biomimetic wind converter showing the application of principles of Structural
Steel Design and Reinforced Concrete Design. The project will be located at University Drive, Biñan,
Laguna. In the hope that relaxing design will lead to a better recovery, the entire design, given the
designated structures, aims to be durable, safe, comfortable and economical to use, which is still in
compliance with the standard codes and specifications.
The hospital with a total lot area of 4,674.13 square meters will offer health care facilities
including a recovery building for awaiting discharge patients. The hospital with an H-shape structure
will have an emergency area in the middle and a recovery area for patients on the right side. Wall
boundaries will be around the perimeter of the property that will serve as the protection and separating
line between adjacent property. Liteblock will be used in the interior walls of the building. Vortex is
design to the middle not just as aesthetics also serves as the passageway of rainwater to the catchment.
The water in the catchment will be filtered and used for non-potable purposes such as irrigation and as
the water in the fountain.
1
Technological Institute of the Philippines – Manila
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
1.2 LOCATION MAP
The project is deliberately placed in University Drive, Biñan, Laguna in the property of Alveo
Land. In the recent years, the south becomes favored residential destination because of the progressing
communities that are innovative and sustainable. The researchers consider the statement of Laguna’s
health chief Mr. Bagamasbad, “one of the problems of the province is the lack of healthcare facilities
due to the rising cases of Covid 19”, in choosing the location. It is accessible from the South Luzon
Expressway through the main roads of Governor’s Drive and the Sta. Rosa-Tagaytay Road.
Accessibility is seen to further improve upon completion of the Cavite-Laguna Expressway and the
planned Cavite-Tagaytay-Batangas Expressway.
FIGURE 1.1 LOCATION MAP
Figure 1.1: Shows the project location’s satellite view from google earth with the yellow outline as
the lot’s perimeter for the proposed project.
Project Name: 5-STOREY GREEN BUILDING HOSPITAL
Location: University Drive, Biñan, Laguna
2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
FIGURE 1.2: PROJECT LOCATION BLOW-UP PLAN
Figure 1.2: Shows the close-up plan of the proposed project’s location
FIGURE 1.3 ELEVATION MAP
Figure 1.3: Shows the elevation of the project’s location from the topographic map. The different
color indicates the elevation of the location of the project’s site elevation is 46 m.
3
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
FIGURE 1.4 PROPOSED LOT’S MEASUREMENT
Figure 1.4: Shows measurement of the proposed lot’s project. The lot area is 4,674.13 sq. meters.
1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
This project intends to:
• To design a structural system that meets the desired needs within realistic constraints such as
economic, environmental, health and safety.
• To apply the standard codes and specifications stated in the National Building Code of the
Philippines (NBCP), National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP), Philippine Green
Building Code (PGBC), and principles in courses of Civil Engineering such as Reinforced
Concrete Design (RCD), Foundation Design and Structural Steel Design (SSD).
• To be able to use the technical skills and modern engineering software in the design process
such as Revit, ETABS 2016, Microsoft office excel, and Lumion.
• To use Ultimate Strength Design (USD) of Reinforced Concrete Design (RCD) and
Allowable Stress Design (ASD) / Load and Reinforced Factored Design (LRFD) of
Structural Steel Design (SSD)
4
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
1.4 THE CLIENT
MCGI (The Member Church of God International) is a Christian religious organization, the
main headquarters is in the Apalit, Pampanga, Philippines. Central to the works of Members Church
of God International (MCGI) are charitable projects that seek to more effectively and efficiently free
social services for people needing help. The reason for these charitable works is to fulfill the Lord
Jesus Christ’s admonition to Christians in Galatians 6:10, “As we have therefore opportunity, let us
do good unto all men, especially unto them who are of the household of faith.” Thus, the late Bro. Eli,
former Overall Servant, and Bro. Daniel, the new Overall Servant of MCGI, respectively, founded
different initiatives to address a range of tough social situations that many of our fellowmen face daily.
These social services are free to store, feeding program, wish-granting program, free potable water,
orphanage, and elder care, infant care, free education, legal consultation, disaster relief, diagnostic
center, and ADD infirmary and medical missions.
5
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
The Members Church of God International aspires to make medical aid accessible to everyone.
With the help of God, MCGI can regularly conduct medical missions All over the globe nearby and
far-flung areas and even in jails, providing medical and dental services as well as medicines to the
beneficiaries. Open to both members and non-members of the Church, licensed medical practitioners
willingly give assistance and treatment to their patients at no cost. It is manned by members of the
Church coming from different fields of expertise who wish to offer their knowledge and services to
indigents who cannot afford the usual doctor’s fee. Free medicine is also handed out to patients.
Today, with news about a rising threat against Covid-19. MCGI, in partnership with UNTV,
has come up with the idea of erecting an additional health facility that can hold a hundred Covid-19
patients. The health facility will be with state-of-the-art machines and laboratory equipment and is
open to anyone who needs to avail of medical services the facility renders, at absolutely no cost. The
facility aims to help poor members of the Church as well as non-members with their laboratory
requirements, so that doctors may properly assess their sickness and state of health. The services that
will be offered include 2D echo, blood chemistry analysis, EKG, hematology, ultrasound, dental x-
ray, and x-ray, among others — giving individuals and families one less thing to worry about and
focus more on other aspects of their lives.
6
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
1.5 SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS
This project covers the structural analysis and design computation of the H-shaped hospital
green building computed using modern software application in Microsoft Office Excel through
spreadsheets and computer-aided software ETABS 2016. It focuses on the structural analysis
and structural elements of 5 storey green building hospital. It aims to apply modern software
applications such as Microsoft Office Excel, ETABS 2016, Revit, and Lumion in the structural analysis
and design process.
The research will be conducted in limited resources and time. Time and resources are a
constraint in doing this project. Also, this project is limited for:
• Architectural Design: Perspectives, floor plans, elevations, sections
• Structural Design: Foundation plan and structural framing plan
• Design of reinforced concrete, structural steel, and foundation design
• Reference materials found on google
The following are not covered in this project: electrical works, plumbing/sanitary works,
mechanical works, the design of vortex and fire protection layout.
7
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUTS
2.1 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
The architectural plan consists of vicinity map, perspectives, floor plans and elevations and
section. The hospital was designed as “H-shaped”. The basement will be a parking lot and in the center
of the basement is an operating and maintenance room for the catchment basin. There is also a parking
lot for the patients at the front of the hospital. The catchment basin is located at the center of the
hospital from 3rd floor down to the 2nd floor where you will see in the middle of it is a fountain. The
hospital has two main buildings where the other building will be exclusive for covid-19 patients to
avoid the spread of the virus. In the roof deck, there is a helipad, and it is where we will install the
wind turbine that will generate electricity that helps the hospital to lessen their power consumption.
2.1.1 VICINITY MAP
VICINITY MAP
Figure 2.1: Shows the landmarks surroundings the project’s location.
8
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.1.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Figure 2.2: NOT TO SCALE – Site Development Plan
9
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.1.3 3D PERSPECTIVE
PERSPECTIVE
Figure 2.3: NOT TO SCALE – Perspective of proposed project
10
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
PERSPECTIVE
Figure 2.4: NOT TO SCALE – Perspective of proposed project
11
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.1.4 FLOOR PLANS
BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.5: NOT TO SCALE – Basement Floor Plan.
12
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
GROUND FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.6: NOT TO SCALE – Ground Floor Plan
13
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2ND FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.7: NOT TO SCALE – 2nd Floor Plan
14
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3rd FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.8: NOT TO SCALE – 3rd Floor Plan
15
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4th FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.9: NOT TO SCALE – 4th Floor Plan
16
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
5th FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.10: NOT TO SCALE – 5th Floor Plan
17
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK FLOOR PLAN

Figure 2.11: NOT TO SCALE – Roof Deck Floor Plan
18
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.1.5 ELEVATIONS
FRONT VIEW ELEVATION
Figure 2.12: NOT TO SCALE – Front View Elevation
19
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
REAR VIEW ELEVATION
Figure 2.13: NOT TO SCALE – Rear View Elevation
20
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
RIGHT VIEW ELEVATION
Figure 2.14: NOT TO SCALE – Right View Elevation
21
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
LEFT VIEW ELEVATION
Figure 2.15: NOT TO SCALE – Left View Elevation
22
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.1.6 SECTIONS
LONGITUDINAL SECTION
Figure 2.16: NOT TO SCALE – Longitudinal Section
23
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CROSS SECTION
Figure 2.17: NOT TO SCALE – Cross Section
24
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.2 STRUCTURAL SCHEMATIC PLANS
The structural schematic plan consists of set of detailed plans for how a structure will be
built. It includes the foundation plans, beam layout, slab layout and column layout of the structure.
Revit software helps us in making it easier and consume less of our time.
GENERAL NOTES
General notes are guides from the structural engineer to the structural elements of the
buildings such as Beams, Columns, Slabs, etc. for the construction of the H-Shaped Building.
A. GENERAL NOTES
1. In the interpretation of these drawings, indicated dimensions shall govern and
distances or sizes shall not be scaled for construction purposes.
2. The contractor shall coordinate with the AR, ME, SE, EE, and other utilities and
equipment plans for the exact size, number and locations of all sleeves or openings
thru floor, slabs, beams, walls, and also building dimensions.
3. All reinforced concrete work shall be done in accordance with the ACI - 318 - 89
building code and all structural steel work shall be done in accordance with AISC
specifications (latest edition) in so far as they do not conflict with the local building
code requirements.
4. All slabs, beams, girders, and other structural elements which are not indicated,
detailed, designated, or inadvertently omitted but are necessary to be coordinated
with architectural and other allied engineering plans as well as to complete the
structural works in accordance with the intent of the plans and specifications shall
be brought up during pre - bids/ meetings/ negotiations. It is understood that the
contractor has provided and included all these items in their bid.
25
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
B. FOUNDATION NOTES
1. The foundation is designed for a net allowable soil bearing pressure of 96 kPa (2000
psf) at a minimum depth of 2.00 meters from the natural grade line. Contractor shall
report in writing or the structural engineer on the actual soil conditions uncovered
and confirm actual bearing capacity of soil before depositing concrete.
2. No footing shall rest on fill. Footing for CHB walls and other minor structures shall
be embedded at least 800mm from the natural grade level.
3. Provide temporary removal of water from any source during construction.
Dewatering shall be carefully and properly performed to avoid disturbing the
foundations and slab bearing surfaces.
4. Contractor shall design, install, and monitor excavations retension systems, as
required for the protection of adjacent properties and provide all measures and
precautions necessary to minimize settlement and prevent damage to adjacent
existing or new construction.
5. Prepare conditions of concrete supply and placement of the complete concrete
foundation for the full thickness as a continuous monolithic casting.
6. Do not back fill against basement walls until ground floor slabs have been placed
and concrete has attained the required strength.
C. MASONRY WALLS NOTES
1. All materials and workmanship shall be in accordance with the applicable standards
and specifications of the national concrete masonry association and uniform
building code.
26
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2. Concrete masonry units shall conform to ASTM C90 grade n, with a minimum
compressive strength of 5 MPa (700 psi).
3. Mortar and grout for all reinforced masonry shall conform to ASTM 270 type m
and shall have minimum 28 days standard cylinder compressive of 21 MPa (3000
psi).
4. All masonry walls shall be reinforced according to following indicated schedules
as indicated in plans unless following concrete hollow block schedule.
5. All cells containing reinforcing bars or inserts shall be completely filled with
concrete grout.
D. COLUMN NOTES
1. Where columns change in size, vertical reinforcements shall be offset at a slope not
more than 1- in - 6. Provide transverse reinforcement as per item below for joints
with bar offsets.
2. Lap spliced. When required, are permitted only within the center half of the column
length and shall be proportioned as tension splices, in no case the lap splice be
located closer than a distance equal to the maximum column dimension where the
face of the beam - column joint. Provide extra transverse reinforcement of the same
size and arrangement indicated in the column schedule spaced at one - fourth of the
minimum column section dimension throughout the length of the splice or 100mm.
27
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3. Welded splice and mechanical connection may be used at any section provided not
more than alternate bars in each later at a longitudinal reinforcement are spliced at
any section and the center to center distance between splices of adjacent bars must
be 600mm or more measured along the axis of the column.
4. For all tied columns provide transverse reinforcement of the same size and
arrangement indicated in the column section schedule and spaced no greater than
one - quarter the minimum column section dimension nor 100mm, over a distance
from each joint face of not less than the larger of the maximum column section
dimension, or one - sixth of the clear height of the column or 450mm.
E. SLAB - ON - GRADE NOTES
1. The soil subgrade and fill layers below all slabs on grade, paving and pit slab shall
be mechanically compacted in layers to a minimum of 95 percent of the modified
proctor density. As per ASTM D1557.
2. All slabs - on - grade shall be provided with a minimum of 100mm thick.
Compacted and clean course sand bed, except as otherwise detailed in the plans.
3. Unless otherwise noted, all bedded slabs shall be reinforced with bars at 200mm
O.C. each way at the upper thirds portion of the slab.
4. Place concrete for all slabs - on- grade in checkerboard fashtion between
construction joint areas not to exceed 300 sq. meters with a minimum of 24 hours
between adjacent areas of placement. Construction joint shall not be farther apart
than 8.00 meters in any direction. All slabs on grade shall be saw cut on each grid
line and mid bay line (in both directions within 24 hours of casting).
28
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.2.1 FOUNDATION PLAN
FOUNDATION PLAN
Figure 2.18: NOT TO SCALE – Foundation Plan.
29
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.2.2 STRUCTURAL FRAMING PLANS
1ST FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

Figure 2.19: NOT TO SCALE – First Floor Framing Plan.
30
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 2ND – 3RD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

Figure 2.20: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Second and Third Floor Framing Plan.
31
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 4th – 5th FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

Figure 2.21: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Framing Plan.
32
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK FRAMING PLAN

Figure 2.22: NOT TO SCALE – Roof Deck Framing Plan.
33
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
GROUND FLOOR SLAB DESIGNATION PLAN

Figure 2.23: NOT TO SCALE – Ground Floor Slab Designation Plan.
34
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 2ND – 3RD FLOOR SLAB DESIGNATION PLAN

Figure 2.24: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Second and Third Floor Slab Designation Plan.
35
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 4th – 5th FLOOR SLAB DESIGNATION PLAN

Figure 2.25: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Slab Designation Plan.
36
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK SLAB DESIGNATION PLAN

Figure 2.26: NOT TO SCALE – Roof Deck Slab Designation Plan.
37
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
BASEMENT COLUMN PLAN

Figure 2.27: NOT TO SCALE – Basement Column Plan.
38
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
1ST FLOOR COLUMN PLAN

Figure 2.28: NOT TO SCALE – First Floor Column Plan.
39
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 2ND – 3RD FLOOR COLUMN PLAN

Figure 2.29: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Second and Third Floor Column Plan.
40
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 4TH – 5TH FLOOR COLUMN PLAN

Figure 2.30: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Column Plan.
41
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK COLUMN PLAN

Figure 2.31: NOT TO SCALE –Roof Deck Column Plan.
42
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2.2.3 INITIAL MEMBER SIZES
SLAB
SUPPORT CONDTION MINIMUM h
Simply supported ℓ/20
One end continuous ℓ/24
Both end continuous ℓ/28
Cantilever ℓ/10
Table 2.1: Table 407.3.1.1 Minimum thickness of Solid Non-Prestressed One-way Slabs according to
NSCP 2015
Expression applicable for normal weight concrete and fy = 420 MPa. For other cases, minimum
h shall be modified in accordance with Sections 407.3.1.1.1 through 407.3.1.1.3, as appropriate.
Section 407.3.1.1.1
For fy other than 420 MPa, the expressions shall be multiplied by (0.4 + fy/700)
Sample Computations for Preliminary Slab Sizes
Check First
𝐿
< 𝑜𝑟 > 2
𝑏
𝐿
𝐼𝑓 < 2, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝑖𝑠 𝑻𝒘𝒐 − 𝑾𝒂𝒚
𝑏
𝐿
𝐼𝑓 > 𝑜𝑟 = 2, 𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝑖𝑠 𝑶𝒏𝒆 − 𝑾𝒂𝒚
𝑏
∗ 𝑳 = 𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏
∗ 𝒃 = 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑙𝑎𝑏
One end continuous
S–1
𝐿 9700
= = 3.23 > 2 , (𝑶𝒏𝒆 − 𝑾𝒂𝒚)
𝑏 3005
43
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 2(9700 𝑚𝑚 + 3005 𝑚𝑚)

𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ = =
180 180
ℎ = 141.17 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟏𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎
Both end continuous
S–2
𝐿 9700
= = 2.62 > 2 , (𝑶𝒏𝒆 − 𝑾𝒂𝒚)
𝑏 3700
2(9600 𝑚𝑚 + 3700 𝑚𝑚)

𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ =
180
ℎ = 148.89 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟏𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎
Slab-On-Grade
𝐴𝑠𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑘𝑏𝑡 = 0.002(1000)(225) = 𝟒𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝜋 2
𝐴𝑏 (𝑏) 4 (12) (1000)
𝑠= = = 𝟐𝟓𝟓 𝒎𝒎
𝐴𝑠 450
PRELIMINARY SLAB SIZES

1st FLOOR TO ROOF DECK
b - SHORT SPAN L - LONG SPAN h - THICKNESS
SLABS TYPE
(mm) (mm) (mm)
S-1 ONE-WAY SLAB 3005 9700 225
S-2 ONE-WAY SLAB 3700 9700 225
S-3 ONE-WAY SLAB 2195 9700 225
S-4 ONE-WAY SLAB 3005 10300 225
S-5 ONE-WAY SLAB 3700 10300 225
S-6 ONE-WAY SLAB 2195 10300 225
S-7 ONE-WAY SLAB 1995 10300 225
S-8 ONE-WAY SLAB 3005 8100 225
S-9 ONE-WAY SLAB 3700 8100 225
S-10 ONE-WAY SLAB 2195 8100 225
S-11 ONE-WAY SLAB 3790 8100 225
S-12 ONE-WAY SLAB 4000 8100 225
Table 2.2: Preliminary Slab Sizes of First Floor to Roof Deck
44
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
BEAM
SUPPORT CONDTION MINIMUM h
Simply supported ℓ/16
One end continuous ℓ/18.5
Both end continuous ℓ/21
Cantilever ℓ/8
Table 2.3: Table 409.3.1.1 Minimum depth of Non-Prestressed Beams according to NSCP 2015
Expression applicable for normal weight concrete and fy = 420 MPa. For other cases, minimum
h shall be modified in accordance with Sections 409.3.1.1.1 through 409.3.1.1.3, as appropriate.
Sample Computations for Preliminary Beam Sizes
Simply supported
B–5
𝐿 = 10.4 𝑚
𝐿 10400𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ = = = 650 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟔𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎
16 16
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑏 = 0.3ℎ = 0.3(650) = 195 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒃 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎 𝒎𝒎
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑡𝑟𝑒 𝑥 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚
24𝑘𝑁
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = 𝑥 (0.650 𝑚 ∗ 0.20 𝑚)
𝑚
𝒌𝑵
𝑺𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 = 𝟑. 𝟏𝟐
𝒎
45
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
One end continuous
G–1
𝐿 = 9.6 𝑚
𝐿 9600𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ = = = 518.92 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟓𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎
16 18.5
24𝑘𝑁
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = 𝑥 (0.550 𝑚 ∗ 0.20 𝑚)
𝑚
𝒌𝑵
𝑺𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 = 𝟐. 𝟔𝟒
𝒎
Both end continuous
G–7
𝐿 = 10.4 𝑚
𝐿 10400𝑚𝑚
𝑀𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 ℎ = = = 495.24 𝑚𝑚 𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎 𝒎𝒎
21 21
24𝑘𝑁
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓 𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 = 𝑥 (0.500 𝑚 ∗ 0.20 𝑚)
𝑚
𝒌𝑵
𝑺𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 = 𝟐. 𝟒
𝒎
46
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
PRELIMINARY BEAM SIZES

SPAN b h
BEAMS SUPPORT CONDITION
(mm) (mm) (mm)
G-1 ONE END CONTINUOUS 9090 300 600
G-5 BOTH END CONTINUOUS 9090 300 600
B-1 SIMPLY SUPPORTED 8938 300 600
47
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Table 2.4: Preliminary Beam Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck
COLUMN
Sample Computations for Preliminary Column Sizes
Load Computations
𝑘𝑁
𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 = 24
𝑚3
𝑆𝑒𝑙𝑓𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚:
𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑥 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑆𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝐺 − 1 = 𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑥 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑘𝑁
𝑆𝑤 𝑜𝑓 𝐺 − 1 = 24 (0.300 𝑚 𝑥0.550 𝑚𝑥9.6𝑚)
𝑚3
𝑺𝒆𝒍𝒇 𝒘𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝑮 − 𝟏 = 𝟑𝟖. 𝟎𝟏𝟔 𝒌𝑵
𝑘𝑁
𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 = 24 𝑚3
𝑆𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 (𝑘𝑃𝑎):
𝑈𝑛𝑖𝑡 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑥 ℎ
𝑘𝑁
𝑊𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑆 − 1 = 24 𝑥 0. 215 𝑚
𝑚3
𝑾𝒆𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕 𝑺 − 𝟏 = 𝟓. 𝟏𝟔 𝒌𝑷𝒂
48
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
WALL LOAD
USE WALL LOAD (kPa)
Exterior 4.62(2X0.24)
Interior 3.56(2X0.24)
Exterior Wall Glass 1.39

Table 2.5: Tabulated Wall Loads
UNIFORM LOAD
CATEGORY DESCRIPTION
(kPa)
Wards and rooms 1.9
Hospitals Laboratories and operating rooms 2.9
Corridors above ground floor 3.8

Table 2.6: Table 205-1 Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Live Loads according to NSCP 2015
COMPONENT LOAD (kPa)

Mechanical Duct Allowance 0.2
CEILINGS
Plaster on Concrete 0.24
Cinder Concrete (per mm) 3.8
FLOOR FILL Sand (per mm) 0.015
Stone Concrete (per mm) 0.023
Cement Finish (25 mm) on Stone-Concrete
1.53
FLOOR AND Fill
FLOOR FINISHES Concrete Fill Finish (per mm thickness) 0.0023
Ceramic Tile 0.77
WINDOWS, Exterior Stud Walls 0.53
HALLWAYS Windows, Glass, Frame, and Sash 0.38
EE/ ME UTILITIES 0.25
TOTAL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS 3.068
TOTAL VERTICAL ELEMENTS 1.35
Table 2.7: Tabulated Pressure Loads
49
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 𝑆𝑙𝑎𝑏 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 + 𝑆𝐷𝐿 + 𝑊𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 (1𝑠𝑡 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑘)
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 5.16 + 1.75 + 1.39
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 8.3 𝑘𝑃𝑎 𝑥 6
𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝑳𝒐𝒂𝒅 = 𝟒𝟗. 𝟖 𝒌𝑷𝒂
𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 𝑂𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑝𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑦 (1𝑠𝑡 𝑡𝑜 𝑟𝑜𝑜𝑓 𝑑𝑒𝑐𝑡)
𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 3.8 𝑘𝑃𝑎 𝑥 6
𝑳𝒊𝒗𝒆 𝑳𝒐𝒂𝒅 = 𝟐𝟐. 𝟖 𝒌𝑷𝒂
C–1
𝐴𝑓 = 𝑇𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑢𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎
9.6𝑚 9.7
𝐴𝑓 = ( )( )
2 2
𝑨𝒇 = 𝟐𝟑. 𝟐𝟖 𝒎𝟐
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 91.26 𝑥 23.28
𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 2124.5328 𝑘𝑁
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑘𝑃𝑎 = 2124.5328 + 76.428
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 𝑖𝑛 𝑘𝑃𝑎 = 2200.9608
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐿𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑎𝑑 = 45.6 𝑥 23.28
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒅 𝑳𝒐𝒂𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒌𝑷𝒂 = 𝟏𝟎𝟔𝟏. 𝟓𝟔𝟖 𝒌𝑵
𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝑳𝒐𝒂𝒅 = 𝟏. 𝟐𝑫𝑳 + 𝟏. 𝟔𝑳𝑳
𝐹𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 = 1.2(2200.9608) + (1.6)(1062.568)
𝑃𝑢 = 4339.66176
𝑓𝑦 = 276
𝑓𝑐′ = 28
50
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝑴𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒎𝒖𝒎 𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒅 𝒅𝒊𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒖𝒎𝒏:
𝑃𝑢 = Øɑ(𝑃𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 + 𝑃𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙)
𝑃𝑢 = 0.65(0.8)(0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ (𝐴𝑔 − 0.015𝐴𝑔) + 0.015𝐴𝑔𝑓𝑦)
4339.66176𝑥103 = 0.65(0.8)(0.85(28)(𝐴𝑔 − 0.015𝐴𝑔) + 0.015𝐴𝑔(276))
𝐴𝑔 = 302559.6703 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑔 = 𝑠 2
𝑠 = √𝐴𝑔
𝑠 = √302559.6703
𝑠 = 550.054243𝑚𝑚
𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒔 = 𝟓𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎 𝒙 𝟓𝟓𝟎 𝒎𝒎
𝑵𝒖𝒎𝒃𝒆𝒓 𝒐𝒇 𝟐𝟎 𝒎𝒎 𝒅𝒊𝒂𝒎𝒆𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒕𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔
𝑃𝑢 = 0.65(0.8)(0.85𝑓𝑐 ′ (𝐴𝑔 − 𝐴𝑠𝑡) + 𝐴𝑠𝑡𝑓𝑦)
4339.66176𝑥103 = 0.65(0.8)(0.85(28)(550𝑥550 − 𝐴𝑠𝑡) + 𝐴𝑠𝑡(276))
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 4544.026109 𝑚𝑚
𝑛𝛱
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = (𝑑)2
4
4544.026109
𝑛=
𝛱
(20)2
4
𝑛 = 14.46408433
𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒏 = 𝟏𝟔 𝒃𝒂𝒓𝒔
𝑺𝒑𝒂𝒄𝒊𝒏𝒈𝒐𝒇 𝒍𝒂𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒂𝒍 𝒕𝒊𝒆𝒔
𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 10 𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 16 (𝑑𝑏) = 16 (20) = 320 𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 48 (𝑑𝑡) = 48 (10) = 480 𝑚𝑚
51
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 = 550 𝑚𝑚
𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝑺𝒎𝒂𝒙 = 𝟑𝟐𝟎 𝒎𝒎
PRELIMINARY COLUMN SIZES

BASEMENT TO ROOF DECK
SPAN b h
COLUMNS
(mm) (mm) (mm)
C-1 3850 750 850
C-2 3850 750 850
C-3 3850 750 850
C-4 3850 750 850
C-5 3850 750 850
C-6 3850 750 850
C-7 3850 750 850
C-8 3850 750 850
C-9 3850 750 850
C-10 3850 750 850
C-11 3850 750 850
C-12 3850 750 850
Table 2.8: Preliminary Column Sizes of Basement to Roof Deck
FOOTING
Sample Computations for Preliminary Footing Sizes
𝑭−𝟏
𝑃𝑢𝑛𝑓𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 =
𝐴𝑙𝑙𝑜𝑤𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦
3262.5288 𝑘𝑁
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 =
250 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑨𝒓𝒆𝒂 𝒐𝒇 𝒇𝒐𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈 = 𝟏𝟑. 𝟎𝟓 𝒎𝟐
52
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝐷𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = √𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔
𝐷𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = √13.05 𝑚2
𝐷𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠𝑞𝑢𝑎𝑟𝑒 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 3.61 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒎𝒎 𝒙 𝟒𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒎𝒎
𝑻𝒉𝒊𝒄𝒌𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒐𝒇 𝑭𝒐𝒐𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒈:
𝐵𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑁𝐺𝐿 = 3 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 3 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠 − 2 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑠
𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑐𝑘𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑜𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 = 1 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
𝑠𝑎𝑦 𝒉 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒎𝒎
PRELIMINARY FOOTING SIZES

SPAN b h
DESIGNATIONS
(mm) (mm) (mm)
F-1 4000 4000 1000
F-2 6500 6500 1000
F-3 6000 6000 1000
F-4 5000 5000 1000
F-5 5500 5500 1000
F-6 7500 7500 1000
F-7 8500 8500 1000
F-8 7000 7000 1000
F-9 3500 3500 1000
F-10 3500 3500 1000
F-11 6000 6000 1000
F-12 7000 7000 1000
Table 2.9: Preliminary Footing Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck
53
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STEEL BEAM
Sample Computations for Preliminary Steel Beam Sizes
𝑮−𝟏
𝑈𝑠𝑒 𝑊12𝑥14
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑝𝑡ℎ = 12 𝑖𝑛
𝐹𝑦 = 248 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐹𝑢 = 400 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝐿 = 690.816 𝑘𝑁
𝑻𝒐𝒕𝒂𝒍 𝑳𝑳 = 𝟐𝟐. 𝟖 𝒌𝑵
𝑳𝑹𝑭𝑫:
𝑃𝑢 = 1.2𝐷𝐿 + 1.6𝐿𝐿
𝑃𝑢 = 1.2(690.816 𝑘𝑁) + 1.6(22.8 𝑘𝑁 )
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟖𝟔𝟓. 𝟒𝟓𝟗𝟐 𝒌𝑵
𝑨𝑺𝑫:
𝑃𝑎 = 𝐷𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿
𝑃𝑎 = 690.816 𝑘𝑁 + 22.8 𝑘𝑁
𝑷𝒂 = 𝟕𝟏𝟑. 𝟔𝟏𝟔 𝒌𝑵
𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒅:
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔:
𝑃𝑢
𝐴𝑔𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
0.9𝐹𝑦
865.4592 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 103
0.9(248 𝑀𝑃𝑎 )
𝐴𝑔𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 3877.5053 𝑚𝑚2
54
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑅𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒:
𝑃𝑢
0.752 𝐹𝑢
865.4592 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 103
0.752 (400 𝑀𝑃𝑎 )
𝐴𝑔𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 3846.48533 𝑚𝑚2 𝑮𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏: 𝟑𝟖𝟒𝟔. 𝟒𝟖𝟓𝟑𝟑𝒌𝑵
𝑨𝒍𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒂𝒃𝒍𝒆:
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑌𝑖𝑒𝑙𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔:
𝑃𝑎
0.6𝐹𝑦
713.616 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 103
0.6(248 𝑀𝑃𝑎 )
𝐴𝑔𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 4795.806452 𝑚𝑚2
𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑅𝑢𝑝𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒:
𝑃𝑎
0.52 𝐹𝑢
713.616 𝑘𝑁 ∗ 103
0.52 (400 𝑀𝑃𝑎 )
𝐴𝑔𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 7136.16 𝑚𝑚2 𝑮𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓𝒏: 𝟒𝟕𝟗𝟓. 𝟖𝟎𝟔𝟒𝟓𝟐 𝒌𝑵
𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒓𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝒆, 𝒖𝒔𝒆 𝑾𝟏𝟐𝒙𝟏𝟒
PRELIMINARY STEEL BEAM SIZES

BEAM AREA DEPTH
SHAPE
DESIGNATION (in2) (in)
G1 4.16 12 W12X14
G2 4.16 12 W12X14
G3 4.16 12 W12X14
G4 4.16 12 W12X14
55
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
G5 4.16 12 W12X14
G6 4.16 12 W12X14
G7 4.16 12 W12X14
G8 4.16 12 W12X14
G9 4.16 12 W12X14
G10 4.16 12 W12X14
G11 4.16 12 W12X14
G12 4.16 12 W12X14
G13 4.16 12 W12X14
G14 4.16 12 W12X14
G15 4.16 12 W12X14
G16 4.16 12 W12X14
G17 4.16 12 W12X14
G18 4.16 12 W12X14
G19 4.16 12 W12X14
G20 4.16 12 W12X14
G21 4.16 12 W12X14
G22 4.16 12 W12X14
G23 4.16 12 W12X14
G24 4.16 12 W12X14
G25 4.16 12 W12X14
G26 4.16 12 W12X14
G27 4.16 12 W12X14
G28 4.16 12 W12X14
G29 4.16 12 W12X14
G30 4.16 12 W12X14
G31 4.16 12 W12X14
B1 4.16 12 W12X14
B2 4.16 12 W12X14
B3 4.16 12 W12X14
B4 4.16 12 W12X14
B5 4.16 12 W12X14
B6 4.16 12 W12X14
B7 4.16 12 W12X14
B8 4.16 12 W12X14
B9 4.16 12 W12X14
B10 4.16 12 W12X14
B11 4.16 12 W12X14
Table 2.10: Preliminary Steel Beam Sizes of First floor to Roof Deck
56
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STEEL COLUMN
Sample Computations for Preliminary Steel Column Sizes
𝑪−𝟏
𝐿 = 3.85 𝑚
𝐾=1
𝐹𝑦 = 248 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐹𝑢 = 400 𝑀𝑝𝑎
𝐸 = 200,000 𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐷𝐿 = 330.6765 𝑘𝑁
𝐿𝐿 = 175.56 𝑘𝑁
𝑳𝑹𝑭𝑫:
Ø = 0.90
𝑃𝑢 = 1.2𝐷𝐿 + 1.6𝐿𝐿
𝑃𝑢 = 1.2(330.6765 𝑘𝑁) + 1.6(175.56 𝑘𝑁 )
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟔𝟕𝟕. 𝟕𝟎𝟕𝟖 𝒌𝑵
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.5𝐹𝑦
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.5(248)
𝑨𝒔𝒔𝒖𝒎𝒆 𝑭𝒄𝒓 = 𝟏𝟐𝟒
𝑭𝒂𝒄𝒕𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒅:
𝑃𝑢
𝐴𝑔 =
Ø𝐹𝑐𝑟
677.7078 𝑘𝑁𝑥103
𝐴𝑔 =
(0.90)(124)
𝐴𝑔 = 6072.6505 𝑚𝑚2
57
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝐴𝑔 = 9420 𝑚𝑚2
𝑟𝑥 = 110 𝑚𝑚
𝑟𝑦 = 49.8 𝑚𝑚
𝐾𝐿 3.85𝑥103
= = 77.30924
𝑟𝑦 49.8
𝐾𝑙
< 200, 𝑢𝑠𝑒 77.30924
𝑟
𝐸 200,000
4.71√ = 4.71√ = 133.755
𝐹𝑦 248
𝐾𝑙 𝐸
< 4.71√
𝑟 𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑦
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒: 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658 𝐹𝑒 ) (𝐹𝑦)
𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658 𝐹𝑒 ) (𝐹𝑦)
𝜋2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 =
𝐾𝑙 2
(𝑟)
𝜋 2 (200,000)
𝐹𝑒 =
(77.30924)2
𝐹𝑒 = 105.1279
248
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658105.1279 ) (248)
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 92.393412
58
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝑃𝑛 = 𝐹𝑐𝑟𝐴𝑔
𝑃𝑛 = (92.393412)(6072.6505 𝑚𝑚2 )
𝑃𝑛 = 561.0729 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑢 = Ø𝑃𝑛
𝑃𝑢 = (0.90)(561.0729)
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟓𝟎𝟒. 𝟗𝟔𝟓𝟔𝟏𝟑 𝒌𝑵
𝑨𝑳𝑳𝑶𝑾𝑨𝑩𝑳𝑬:
𝐴𝑆𝐷: Ὠ = 0.60
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.5𝐹𝑦
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.5(248)
𝐴𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 124
𝑃𝑎 = 𝐷𝐿 + 𝐿𝐿
𝑃𝑎 = 330.6765 𝑘𝑁 + 175.56 𝑘𝑁
𝑷𝒂 = 𝟓𝟎𝟔. 𝟐𝟑𝟔𝟓 𝒌𝑵
𝑃𝑎
𝐴𝑔 =
𝐹𝑐𝑟
Ὠ
506.2365 𝑘𝑁𝑥103
𝐴𝑔 =
124
0.60
𝐴𝑔 = 2449.531452 𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑔 = 9420 𝑚𝑚2
𝑟𝑥 = 110 𝑚𝑚
𝑟𝑦 = 49.8 𝑚𝑚
59
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
𝐾𝐿 3.85𝑥103
= = 77.30924
𝑟𝑦 49.8
𝐾𝑙
< 200, 𝑢𝑠𝑒 77.30924
𝑟
𝐸 200,000
4.71√ = 4.71√ = 133.755
𝐹𝑦 248
𝐾𝑙 𝐸
< 4.71√
𝑟 𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑦
𝑇ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑒: 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658 𝐹𝑒 ) (𝐹𝑦)
𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658 𝐹𝑒 ) (𝐹𝑦)
𝜋2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 =
𝐾𝑙 2
(𝑟)
𝜋 2 (200,000)
𝐹𝑒 =
(77.30924)2
𝐹𝑒 = 105.1279
248
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = (0.658105.1279 ) (248)
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 92.393412
𝑃𝑛 = 𝐹𝑐𝑟𝐴𝑔
𝑃𝑛 = (92.393412)(9420𝑚𝑚2 )
𝑃𝑛 = 226.3206 𝑘𝑁
𝑃𝑢 = Ø𝑃𝑛
𝑃𝑢 = (0.90)(226.3206)
𝑷𝒖 = 𝟏𝟑𝟓. 𝟕𝟗𝟐𝟑 𝒌𝑵
60
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
PRELIMINARY STEEL COLUMN SIZES

BASEMENT TO ROOF DECK
COLUMN AREA DEPTH

SHAPE
DESIGNATION (in2) (in)
C-1 14.7 12.19 W12X50

C-2 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-3 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-4 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-5 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-6 19.1 12.12 W12X65
C-7 19.1 12.12 W12X65
C-8 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-9 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-10 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-11 14.7 12.19 W12X50
C-12 14.7 12.19 W12X50
Table 2.11: Preliminary Steel Column Sizes of Basement to Roof Deck
61
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CHAPTER 3: PROJECT DESIGN
PRE-DESIGN ANALYSIS
3.1 DESIGN CRITERIA
3.1.1 CODES, STANDARDS, AND REFERENCES
The hospital building is design fulfilling the codes, references, standards and specifications
of the following issuing:
▪ National Structural Code of the Philippines 7th Edition (2015) – It is the primary design
code in the country. It serves as minimum standards and guidelines to civil and structural
engineers on the design and assessment of buildings and any other structures since its
first edition in 1972.
▪ PHILIPPINE GREEN BUILDING CODE – It seeks to improve the efficiency of building
performance by adopting measures that promote resource management efficiency and site
sustainability while minimizing the negative impact of buildings on human health and the
environment.
▪ LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTORED DESIGN - It is a systematic plan of designing
steel structures and other structural components which is different from the traditionally
used.
▪ ASEP STEEL HANDBOOK – It is a manual that serves as a guide in a selection and use
of locally available structural steel products.
3.1.2 COMPUTER SOFTWARE’S APPLICATION
With the help of engineering software applications in doing the project it helps us consume
minimal amount of our and at the same time it created an efficient project. These computer software
applications are:
62
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
▪ REVIT – It is a building information modelling software used by architects, structural
engineers, engineers, and contractors. It allows users to design a building in 3D, annotate the
model with 2D drafting elements and access building information from the building models
database. It is a 4D BIM capable with tools to plan and track various stages in the building's
lifecycle, from concept to construction and later demolition. The students used this in doing
the architectural plan and structural plan of the project.
▪ MICROSOFT EXCEL – It is a spreadsheet software program that is powerful data
visualization and analysis tool. It can take your structural analysis to the next level. The
students used it in engineering computation of the project used in structural details.
▪ LUMION – is 3D rendering software made for architects. If you done creating a 3D
model of your design, it can help you bring it to life. The students used this software in
rendering of architectural plan of the project in chapter 2.
▪ ETABS v.2016 – means Three-Dimensional Analysis of Building System. It is a
software generally used for structural analysis of building or any structure by civil engineers.
This software helps the students to easily analyze the concrete moment frame of the multi-
storey project.
63
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.1.3 MATERIALS AND SPECIFICATIONS
For Reinforced Concrete
MATERIAL PROPERTIES IMPERIAL METRIC
Unit Weight 154.155 lb/ft^3 24 KN/m^3
Compressive Strength of
4.061 ksi 28 MPa
Concrete (fc’)
Yielding Strength of Steel
40.03 ksi 276 MPa
(fy)
Modulus of Elasticity (Ec) 3607.098 ksi 24870.062 MPa
Table 3.1: Tabulated Material Specifications for RC
For Steel
Material specification = A36 Steel
MATERIAL ROPERTIES IMPERIAL METRIC
Unit Weight 494.578 lb/ft^3 77 KN/m^3
Bulk Modulus 20,300 ksi 140 GPa
Yielding Strength of Steel

36, 300 psi 250 MPa
(fy)
Modulus of Elasticity (Ec) 29,000 ksi 200,000 MPa
Table 3.2: Tabulated Material Specifications for Steel
64
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.1.4 DESIGN LOADS
LOADING PLAN
1st FLOOR WALL LOADING PLAN

Figure 3.1: NOT TO SCALE – First Floor Wall Loading Plan.
65
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 2nd– 3rd WALL LOADING PLAN

Figure 3.2: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Second to Third Floor Wall Loading Plan.
66
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 4th – 5th WALL LOADING PLAN

Figure 3.3: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Wall Loading Plan.
67
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
1st FLOOR SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD PLAN

Figure 3.4: NOT TO SCALE – First Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan.
68
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 2nd – 3rd SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD PLAN

Figure 3.5: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Second to Third Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan.
69
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TYPICAL 4th – 5th SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD PLAN

Figure 3.6: NOT TO SCALE – Typical Fourth to Fifth Floor Superimposed Dead Load Plan.
70
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.1.5 LOAD COMBINATIONS
NSCP 2015 203.2 SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS

D = dead load
E = earthquake load set forth in Section 208.6.1
Em = estimated maximum earthquake force that can be developed in the structure as set forth
in Section 208.6. I
F = load due to fluids with well—defined pressures and maximum heights
H = load due to lateral pressure of soil and water in soil
L = live load, except roof live load, including any permitted live load reduction
Lr = roof live load. including any permitted live load reduction
P = ponding load
R = rain load on the undeflected roof
T = self—straining force and effects arising from contraction or expansion resulting from
temperature change. shrinkage, moisture change, creep in component materials,
movement due to differential settlement, or combinations thereof
W = load due to wind pressure
Load combinations using strength design or load and resistance factor design:
DL + LL
Punfactored at C-1 = 1061.568KN + 2200.9608KN
Punfactored at C-1 = 3262.53 kN
Load combinations using allowable stress or allowable strength design
1.2(DL) + 1.6(LL)
Pfactored at C-1 = 1.2(1061.568KN) + 1.6(2200.9608KN)
Pfactored at C-1 = 4339.66 kN
71
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL
3.2.1 3D GEOMETRICAL MODEL
Figure 3.7: 3D Geometrical Model for Reinforced Concrete Structure
72
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.8: 3D Geometrical Model for Steel Structure
73
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.2 BASE SUPPORT CONNECTIONS MODEL STRUCTURAL
Figure 3.9: Foundation Level
74
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.3 FRAMING PLANS ON MODEL
Figure 3.10: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Basement
75
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.11: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for First Floor
76
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.12: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Second and Third Floor
77
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.13: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Fourth Floor
78
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.14: Reinforced Concrete Structure Framing Plan for Fifth Floor and Roof Deck
79
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.15: Reinforced Concrete Structure Column Designation

80
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.16: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Basement
81
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.17: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Ground Floor
82
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.18: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Second and Third Floor
83
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.19: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Fourth Floor
84
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.20: Steel Structure Framing Plan for Fifth Floor
85
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.21: Steel Concrete Structure Column Designation
86
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.4 ELEVATION VIEWS ON MODEL
Figure 3.22: Reinforced Concrete Structure Front View
87
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.23: Reinforced Concrete Structure Rear View
88
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.24: Reinforced Concrete Structure Left View
89
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.25: Reinforced Concrete Structure Right View
90
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.26: Steel Structure Front View
91
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.27: Steel Structure Rear View
92
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.28: Steel Structure Left View
93
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.29: Steel Structure Right View
94
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.5 MATERIAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT INPUTS
Figure 3.30: Concrete Material Properties
95
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.31: Steel Material Properties
96
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.32: Slab Material Properties
97
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figures 3.33-34: Slab Property Modifiers
98
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
99
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figures 3.35-36: Beam Property Modifiers
Figure 3.37: Restraints Joint Assignment
100
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.6 FRAME SECTION PROPERTY INPUTS
Figures 3.38-39: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Beams
101
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figures 3.40-41: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Columns
102
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figures 3.42-43: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Steel Beams
103
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figures 3.44-45: Reinforced Concrete Structure Frame Section Properties of Steel Columns
104
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.7 STIFFNESS MODIFIER FACTORS INPUTS
Figure 3.46: Stiffness Modification Factors of Concrete Beams
105
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.47: Stiffness Modification Factors of Concrete Columns
106
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.48: Stiffness Modification Factors of Slabs
107
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.49: Stiffness Modification Factors of Steel Beams
108
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.50: Stiffness Modification Factors of Steel Columns
109
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.51: Stiffness Modification Factors of Walls
110
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.8 ASSIGNMENT OF REALEASE
Figure 3.52: Assignment of Release
111
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.53: Assignment of Moment of Release
112
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.2.9 OTHER ANALYSIS INPUTS
Figure 3.54: P-Delta Inputs
113
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.55: Property Modifiers for Beams
114
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.56: Property Modifiers for Columns
115
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.3 LOAD COMPUTATION
3.3.1 LOAD APPLICATION ON MODEL
116
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.57: Application of Displaced Dead Load on Model
Figure 3.58: Application of Displaced Superimposed Dead Load on Model
117
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.59: Application of Displaced Live Load on Model

118
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.60: Application of Displaced Seismic Load along X-Direction on Model

119
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.61: Application of Displaced Seismic Load along Y-Direction on Model

120
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.62: Seismic Load Pattern
121
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.63: Application of Displaced Wind Load along X-Direction on Model

122
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.64: Application of Displaced Wind Load along Y-Direction on Model

123
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.65: Wind Load Pattern
124
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.66: Wind Exposure Width Data
125
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.67: Moment Diagram of Applied Loads on Model
126
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.68: Torsion Diagram of Applied Loads on Model
127
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.69: Axial Force Diagram of Applied Loads on Model
128
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.70: Shear Force Diagram of Applied Loads on Model
129
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.3.2 DEAD LOAD BY SELF-WEIGHT
DEAD LOAD
Dead load on a structural element is the weight of the member itself plus the weights of all
materials permanently incorporated into the structure frame and supported by the member. It includes
the weights of permanent partitions or walls, the weights of plumbing stacks, electrical feeders,
permanent mechanical equipment, and so on.
COLUMNS SELF-WEIGHT
BASEMENT COLUMNS
DEPTH WIDTH LENGTH WEIGHT
QUANTITY
mm mm mm kN
71 750 850 3850 4182.255
Total Dead Load 4182.255

Table 3.3: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Basement
GROUND FLOOR TO 3RD FLOOR COLUMNS

QUANTITY
mm mm mm kN
68 750 850 3850 4005.54

Table 3.4: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Second Floor to Third Floor
130
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR COLUMNS

QUANTITY
mm mm mm kN
62 750 850 3850 3652.11

Table 3.5: Tabulated Self-Weight of Columns from Fourth Floor to Fifth Floor
BEAMS SELF-WEIGHT
GROUND FLOOR BEAMS
BASE HEIGHT LENGTH WEIGHT

QUANTITY DESIGNATION
mm mm mm kN
6 G-1 300 600 9090 235.61
8 G-2 300 600 9090 314.15
4 G-3 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-4 300 600 9090 78.54
4 G-5 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-6 300 600 9090 78.54
2 G-7 300 600 7690 66.44
4 G-8 300 600 7390 127.70
2 G-9 300 600 7390 63.85
2 G-10 300 600 7690 66.44
2 G-11 300 600 2740 23.67
2 G-12 300 600 4340 37.50
2 G-13 300 600 4340 37.50
4 G-14 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-15 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-16 300 600 4390 75.86
2 G-17 300 600 4390 37.93
2 G-18 300 600 9090 78.54
6 G-19 300 600 8938 231.67
8 G-20 300 600 8938 308.90
2 G-21 300 600 8938 77.22
131
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2 G-22 300 600 8938 77.22
6 G-23 300 600 9538 247.22
8 G-24 300 600 9538 329.63
2 G-25 300 600 9538 82.41
2 G-26 300 600 9538 82.41
4 G-27 300 600 7338 126.80
8 G-28 300 600 7338 253.60
4 G-29 300 600 7338 126.80
4 G-30 300 600 7338 126.80
2 G-31 300 600 7338 63.40
16 B-1 300 600 8938 617.79
4 B-2 300 600 8938 154.45
8 B-3 300 600 9538 329.63
4 B-4 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-5 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-6 300 600 9538 164.82
16 B-7 300 600 7338 507.20
4 B-8 300 600 7338 126.80
4 B-9 300 600 7338 126.80
4 B-10 300 600 7338 126.80
Table 3.6: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from First or Ground Floor
2nd FLOOR TO 3rd FLOOR BEAMS

mm mm mm kN
6 G-1 300 600 9090 235.61
8 G-2 300 600 9090 314.15
4 G-3 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-4 300 600 9090 78.54
4 G-5 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-6 300 600 9090 78.54
2 G-7 300 600 7690 66.44
4 G-8 300 600 7390 127.70
2 G-10 300 600 7690 66.44
2 G-11 300 600 2740 23.67
2 G-12 300 600 4340 37.50
2 G-13 300 600 4340 37.50
132
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4 G-14 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-15 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-16 300 600 4390 75.86
2 G-17 300 600 4390 37.93
2 G-18 300 600 9090 78.54
6 G-19 300 600 8938 231.67
8 G-20 300 600 8938 308.90
2 G-21 300 600 8938 77.22
2 G-22 300 600 8938 77.22
6 G-23 300 600 9538 247.22
8 G-24 300 600 9538 329.63
2 G-25 300 600 9538 82.41
2 G-26 300 600 9538 82.41
4 G-27 300 600 7338 126.80
8 G-28 300 600 7338 253.60
4 G-29 300 600 7338 126.80
4 G-30 300 600 7338 126.80
16 B-1 300 600 8938 617.79
4 B-2 300 600 8938 154.45
8 B-3 300 600 9538 329.63
4 B-4 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-5 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-6 300 600 9538 164.82
16 B-7 300 600 7338 507.20
4 B-8 300 600 7338 126.80
4 B-9 300 600 7338 126.80
4 B-11 300 600 2700 46.66
Table 3.7: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Second to Third Floor
4th FLOOR TO 5th FLOOR BEAMS

mm mm mm kN
6 G-1 300 600 9090 235.61
8 G-2 300 600 9090 314.15
4 G-3 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-4 300 600 9090 78.54
133
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4 G-5 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-6 300 600 9090 78.54
2 G-12 300 600 4340 37.50
2 G-13 300 600 4340 37.50
4 G-14 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-15 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-16 300 600 4390 75.86
2 G-17 300 600 4390 37.93
2 G-18 300 600 9090 78.54
6 G-19 300 600 8938 231.67
8 G-20 300 600 8938 308.90
2 G-21 300 600 8938 77.22
2 G-22 300 600 8938 77.22
6 G-23 300 600 9538 247.22
8 G-24 300 600 9538 329.63
2 G-25 300 600 9538 82.41
2 G-26 300 600 9538 82.41
4 G-27 300 600 7338 126.80
8 G-28 300 600 7338 253.60
4 G-29 300 600 7338 126.80
4 G-30 300 600 7338 126.80
2 G-31 300 600 7338 63.40
16 B-1 300 600 8938 617.79
4 B-2 300 600 8938 154.45
8 B-3 300 600 9538 329.63
4 B-4 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-5 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-6 300 600 9538 164.82
16 B-7 300 600 7338 507.20
4 B-8 300 600 7338 126.80
4 B-11 300 600 2700 46.66
Table 3.8: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Fourth to Fifth Floor
134
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK BEAMS

mm mm mm kN
6 G-1 300 600 9090 235.61
8 G-2 300 600 9090 314.15
4 G-3 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-4 300 600 9090 78.54
4 G-5 300 600 9090 157.08
2 G-6 300 600 9090 78.54
2 G-12 300 600 4340 37.50
2 G-13 300 600 4340 37.50
4 G-14 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-15 300 600 4390 75.86
4 G-16 300 600 4390 75.86
2 G-17 300 600 4390 37.93
2 G-18 300 600 9090 78.54
6 G-19 300 600 8938 231.67
8 G-20 300 600 8938 308.90
2 G-21 300 600 8938 77.22
2 G-22 300 600 8938 77.22
6 G-23 300 600 9538 247.22
8 G-24 300 600 9538 329.63
2 G-25 300 600 9538 82.41
2 G-26 300 600 9538 82.41
4 G-27 300 600 7338 126.80
8 G-28 300 600 7338 253.60
4 G-29 300 600 7338 126.80
4 G-30 300 600 7338 126.80
2 G-31 300 600 7338 63.40
16 B-1 300 600 8938 617.79
4 B-2 300 600 8938 154.45
8 B-3 300 600 9538 329.63
4 B-4 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-5 300 600 9538 164.82
4 B-6 300 600 9538 164.82
16 B-7 300 600 7338 507.20
4 B-8 300 600 7338 126.80
Table 3.9: Tabulated Self-Weight of Beams from Roof Deck
135
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
SLAB SELF-WEIGHT
GROUND FLOOR SLAB WEIGHT
LENGTH WIDTH THICKNESS WEIGHT

mm mm mm kN
16 S-1 9700 3005 225 2518.43
8 S-2 9700 3700 225 1550.45
8 S-3 9700 2195 225 919.79
12 S-4 10300 3005 225 2005.66
4 S-5 10300 3700 225 823.18
8 S-6 10300 2195 225 976.69
4 S-7 10300 1995 225 443.85
16 S-8 8100 3005 225 2103.02
8 S-9 8100 3700 225 1294.70
8 S-10 8100 2195 225 768.07
8 S-11 8100 3790 225 1326.20
8 S-12 8100 4000 225 1399.68
Table 3.10: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Ground Floor
2nd TO 3RD FLOOR SLAB WEIGHT

mm mm mm kN
12 S-1 9700 3005 225 1888.82
8 S-2 9700 3700 225 1550.45
8 S-3 9700 2195 225 919.79
12 S-4 10300 3005 225 2005.66
4 S-5 10300 3700 225 823.18
8 S-6 10300 2195 225 976.69
4 S-7 10300 1995 225 443.85
16 S-8 8100 3005 225 2103.02
8 S-9 8100 3700 225 1294.70
8 S-10 8100 2195 225 768.07
8 S-11 8100 3790 225 1326.20
4 S-13 6634 3005 225 430.60
Table 3.11: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Second to Third Floor
136
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4TH FLOOR TO 5TH FLOOR SLAB WEIGHT

mm mm mm kN
12 S-1 9700 3005 225 1888.82
8 S-2 9700 3700 225 1550.45
8 S-3 9700 2195 225 919.79
12 S-4 10300 3005 225 2005.66
4 S-5 10300 3700 225 823.18
8 S-6 10300 2195 225 976.69
4 S-7 10300 1995 225 443.85
16 S-8 8100 3005 225 2103.02
8 S-9 8100 3700 225 1294.70
8 S-10 8100 2195 225 768.07
4 S-13 6634 3005 225 430.60
Table 3.12: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Fourth to Fifth Floor
ROOF DECK SLAB WEIGHT

mm mm mm kN
16 S-1 9700 3005 225 2518.43
8 S-2 9700 3700 225 1550.45
8 S-3 9700 2195 225 919.79
12 S-4 10300 3005 225 2005.66
4 S-5 10300 3700 225 823.18
8 S-6 10300 2195 225 976.69
4 S-7 10300 1995 225 443.85
16 S-8 8100 3005 225 2103.02
8 S-9 8100 3700 225 1294.70
8 S-10 8100 2195 225 768.07
Table 3.13: Tabulated Self-Weight of Slabs from Roof Deck
137
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.3.3 LIVE LOAD
LIVE LOAD
These are the maximum loads expected by the intended use or occupancy. Most building codes
contain a table of design or specified live loads. To simplify the calculations, these are expressed as
uniform loads on the floor area. Refer to NSCP Section 205 for reference.
BASEMENT LIVE LOADS
COMPONENTS LOAD (kPa)
Stairs 4.8
Public parking and ramps 4.8
Elevator 2*(total load)

Table 3.14: Table 205-1 Minimum Uniform and Concentrated Loads and Table 205-2 Special Loads
of Basement according to NSCP 2015
GROUND FLOOR LIVE LOADS

Stairs 4.8
Laboratories and operating
2.9
room
Wards and room 1.9
Ground floor corridors 4.8
Stores (retail) 4.8
Lobbies 4.8
Office use 2.4
Storage (light) 6.0
Exit facilities 4.8
of Ground Floor according to NSCP 2015
138
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2nd FLOOR LIVE LOADS
Stairs 4.8
2.9
room
Wards and room 1.9
Above ground floor corridors 3.8
Lobbies 4.8
Office use 2.4
Exit facilities 4.8
Storage (light) 6.0

of Second Floor according to NSCP 2015
3rd FLOOR LIVE LOADS
Stairs 4.8
2.9
room
Lobbies 4.8
Wards and room 1.9
Office use 2.4
Exit facilities 4.8
Storage (light) 6.0

of Third Floor according to NSCP 2015
139
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4th FLOOR LIVE LOADS
Stairs 4.8
2.9
room
Wards and room 1.9
Office use 2.4
Exit facilities 4.8
Lobbies 4.8

of Fourth Floor according to NSCP 2015
5th FLOOR LIVE LOADS
Stairs 4.8
Wards and room 1.9
Office use 2.4
Exit facilities 4.8
Lobbies 4.8

of Fifth Floor according to NSCP 2015
140
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ROOF DECK LIVE LOADS
Component Load (kPa)
Helipad 4.8
of Roof Deck according to NSCP 2015
3.3.4 SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD
SUPER IMPOSED DEADLOAD
Superimposed dead loads is consist of loads of permanent fixtures and fittings in example are
ceilings, air-conditioning ducts, floor finishes, partitions, etc.
COMPONENT LOAD (kPa)

Mechanical Duct Allowance 0.2
CEILINGS
Plaster on Concrete 0.24
Cinder Concrete (per mm) 3.8
FLOOR FILL Sand (per mm) 0.015
Stone Concrete (per mm) 0.023
Cement Finish (25 mm) on Stone-Concrete
1.53
FLOOR AND Fill
FLOOR FINISHES Concrete Fill Finish (per mm thickness) 0.0023
Ceramic Tile 0.77
WINDOWS, Exterior Stud Walls 0.53
HALLWAYS Windows, Glass, Frame, and Sash 0.38
EE/ ME UTILITIES 0.25
TOTAL HORIZONTAL ELEMENTS 3.068
TOTAL VERTICAL ELEMENTS 1.35
Table 3.21: Tabulated Pressure Loads
141
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
WALL LOAD
GROUND FLOOR WALL LOADS
WALL LOAD HEIGHT LENGTH WEIGHT

kPa mm mm kN
6 G-1 1.39 4000 9090 7277.82
8 G-2 0.495 4000 9090 3455.65
4 G-3 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-4 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
4 G-5 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-6 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
2 G-7 0.495 4000 7690 730.86
4 G-8 0.44 4000 7390 1248.61
2 G-9 0.495 4000 7390 702.35
2 G-10 0.44 4000 7690 649.65
2 G-11 0.44 4000 2740 231.48
2 G-12 0.495 4000 4340 412.47
2 G-13 1.39 4000 4340 1158.26
4 G-14 1.39 4000 4390 2343.21
4 G-15 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
4 G-16 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
2 G-17 0.495 4000 4390 417.23
2 G-18 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
6 G-19 1.39 4000 8938 7156.12
8 G-20 0.495 4000 8938 3397.87
2 G-21 0.495 4000 8938 849.47
2 G-22 1.39 4000 8938 2385.37
6 G-23 1.39 4000 9538 7636.50
8 G-24 0.495 4000 9538 3625.97
2 G-25 0.495 4000 9538 906.49
2 G-26 1.39 4000 9538 2545.50
4 G-27 1.39 4000 7338 3916.73
8 G-28 0.495 4000 7338 2789.61
4 G-29 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
4 G-30 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
142
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2 G-31 0.495 4000 7338 697.40
16 B-1 0.495 4000 8938 6795.74
4 B-2 4.04 4000 8938 13866.06
8 B-3 4.04 4000 9538 29593.74
4 B-4 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-5 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-6 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
16 B-7 4.04 4000 7338 45535.52
4 B-8 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
4 B-9 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
4 B-10 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
Total Weight 239373.85
Table 3.22: Tabulated Wall Loads of Ground Floor
2nd FLOOR TO 3rd FLOOR WALL LOADS

kPa mm mm kN
6 G-1 1.39 4000 9090 7277.82
8 G-2 0.495 4000 9090 3455.65
4 G-3 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-4 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
4 G-5 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-6 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
2 G-7 0.495 4000 7690 730.86
4 G-8 0.44 4000 7390 1248.61
2 G-9 0.495 4000 7390 702.35
2 G-10 0.44 4000 7690 649.65
2 G-11 0.44 4000 2740 231.48
2 G-12 0.495 4000 4340 412.47
2 G-13 1.39 4000 4340 1158.26
4 G-14 1.39 4000 4390 2343.21
4 G-15 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
4 G-16 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
143
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
2 G-17 0.495 4000 4390 417.23
2 G-18 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
6 G-19 1.39 4000 8938 7156.12
8 G-20 0.495 4000 8938 3397.87
2 G-21 0.495 4000 8938 849.47
2 G-22 1.39 4000 8938 2385.37
6 G-23 1.39 4000 9538 7636.50
8 G-24 0.495 4000 9538 3625.97
2 G-25 0.495 4000 9538 906.49
2 G-26 1.39 4000 9538 2545.50
4 G-27 1.39 4000 7338 3916.73
8 G-28 0.495 4000 7338 2789.61
4 G-29 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
4 G-30 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
2 G-31 0.495 4000 7338 697.40
16 B-1 0.495 4000 8938 6795.74
4 B-2 4.04 4000 8938 13866.06
8 B-3 4.04 4000 9538 29593.74
4 B-4 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-5 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-6 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
16 B-7 4.04 4000 7338 45535.52
4 B-8 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
4 B-9 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
4 B-11 0.495 4000 2700 513.22
Table 3.23: Tabulated Wall Loads of Second to Third Floor
4th FLOOR TO 5th FLOOR WALL LOADS

kPa mm mm kN
6 G-1 1.39 4000 9090 7277.82
8 G-2 0.495 4000 9090 3455.65
144
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4 G-3 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-4 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
4 G-5 0.495 4000 9090 1727.83
2 G-6 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
2 G-7 0.495 4000 7690 730.86
4 G-8 0.44 4000 7390 1248.61
2 G-9 0.495 4000 7390 702.35
2 G-10 0.44 4000 7690 649.65
2 G-11 0.44 4000 2740 231.48
2 G-12 0.495 4000 4340 412.47
2 G-13 1.39 4000 4340 1158.26
4 G-14 1.39 4000 4390 2343.21
4 G-15 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
4 G-16 0.495 4000 4390 834.45
2 G-17 0.495 4000 4390 417.23
2 G-18 0.495 4000 9090 863.91
6 G-19 1.39 4000 8938 7156.12
8 G-20 0.495 4000 8938 3397.87
2 G-21 0.495 4000 8938 849.47
2 G-22 1.39 4000 8938 2385.37
6 G-23 1.39 4000 9538 7636.50
8 G-24 0.495 4000 9538 3625.97
2 G-25 0.495 4000 9538 906.49
2 G-26 1.39 4000 9538 2545.50
4 G-27 1.39 4000 7338 3916.73
8 G-28 0.495 4000 7338 2789.61
4 G-29 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
4 G-30 0.495 4000 7338 1394.81
2 G-31 0.495 4000 7338 697.40
16 B-1 0.495 4000 8938 6795.74
4 B-2 4.04 4000 8938 13866.06
8 B-3 4.04 4000 9538 29593.74
4 B-4 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-5 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
4 B-6 4.04 4000 9538 14796.87
16 B-7 4.04 4000 7338 45535.52
4 B-8 4.04 4000 7338 11383.88
145
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4 B-11 0.495 4000 2700 513.22
Table 3.24: Tabulated Wall Loads of Fourth to Fifth Floor
TOTAL WEIGHT
COLUMNS BEAMS SLABS TOTAL

FLOOR LEVEL
kN kN kN kN
GROUND FLOOR 4005.54 6406.16 16129.71 26541.42
2nd FLOOR 4005.54 6198.77 14531.03 24735.33
3rd FLOOR 4005.54 6198.77 14531.03 24735.33
4th FLOOR 3652.11 5851.11 13204.83 22708.05
5th FLOOR 3652.11 5851.11 13204.83 22708.05
ROOF DECK 0 5804.46 13403.84 19208.29
140636.48
Table 3.25: Tabulated Total Weight of Floor Levels
Table 3.26: Total Dead Load Calculations in ETABS
Dead Load excluding wall load:
142,928.17 − 140,636.48
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = × 100%
142,928.17
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = 1.60%
146
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.3.5 SEISMIC ANALYSIS
SEISMIC LOAD
SEISMIC ANALYSIS FLOWCHART
Figure 3.71: Seismic Analysis Flowchart
147
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Earthquake load, also known as seismic load, takes place due to the inertia force produced in
the building because of seismic excitations. Inertia force varies with the mass. The higher mass of the
structure will imply that the earthquake loading will also be high.
NSCP 2015 Section 208.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of succeeding earthquake provisions is primarily to design seismic-resistant
structures to safeguard against major structural damage that may lead to loss of life and property. These
provisions are not intended to assure zero-damage to structures nor maintain their functionality after a
severe earthquake.
NSCP 2015 Section 208.5.2.1 Design Base Shear and Section 208.3 Symbols and Notations
Ca = seismic coefficient, as set forth in Table 208-7
Cv = seismic coefficient, as set forth in Table 208-8
Ct = numerical coefficient given in Section 208.5.2.2
Ft = that portion of the base shear, V, considered concentrated at the top of the structure in
addition to Fn.
I = importance factor given in Table 208-1
Na = near-source factor used in the determination of Ca in seismic Zone 4 related to both the
proximity of the building or structure to known faults with magnitudes as set forth in
Tables 208-4 and 208-5
Nv = near-source factor used in the determination of Cv in seismic Zone 4 related to both the
proximity of the building or structure to known faults with magnitudes as set forth in
Tables 208-4 and 208-6
148
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
R = numerical coefficient representative of the inherent over-strength and global ductility
capacity of lateral-force-resisting systems, as set forth in Table 208-11 or 208-12
T = elastic fundamental period of vibration of the structure in the direction under
consideration, sec
V = base shear given by equations 208-8, 208-9, 208-10, 208-11 or 208-15
Vx = the design storey shear in Storey x
W = the total Seismic dead load defined in Section 208.5.2.1
Z = seismic zone factor as given in Table 208-3
Ωo = seismic force amplification factor, which is required to account for structural over-
strength and set forth in Table 208-11
SEISMIC PARAMETERS
SEISMIC SOURCE TYPE
University Drive, Biñan, Laguna is 961m away from west valley fault line, the most dangerous
fault line in Philippine area of responsibility, which make the city capable of producing large
magnitude seismic activity. Early 2022, Biñan was shaken by 1 quake of magnitude 3.2 and 4 quakes
between 2.0 and 3.0. There were also 5 quakes below magnitude 2.0 which people don't normally feel
(Volcano Discovery). Thus, the seismic source type of the location is type A.
149
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Unless stated, the following parameters below shall be used in computing the earthquake load.
Seismic Source
Seismic Source Definition
Seismic Source Description
Type Maximum Moment
Magnitude, M
Faults that are capable of producing
A large magnitude events and that have 7.0 ≤ M ≤ 8.4
a high rate of seismic activity.
B All faults other than types A and C. 6.5 ≤ M ≤ 7.0
Faults that are not capable of producing

large magnitude earthquakes and that
C M < 6.5
have a relatively low rate of seismic
activity.
Table 3.27: Table 208.4 Seismic Source Type according to NSCP 2015
SEISMIC ZONE FACTOR, Z
The University Drive in city of Biñan, Laguna is located in the Zone 4 of the map of the
Philippines.
Zone 2 4
Z 0.2 0.4
Table 3.28: Table 208-3 Seismic Zone Factor according to NSCP 2015
150
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.72: Seismic Map for determining Zone Factor
151
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
The nearest fault line in University Drive, Biñan, Laguna is West Valley Fault with 961m,
based on PHILVOLCS Fault Finder.
Figure 3.73: Philippine Map as seen in PHILVOLCS Fault Finder
152
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
OCCUPANCY CATEGORY
The project is a hospital which is in Category I Essential Facilities.
OCCUPANCY
OCCUPANCY OR FUNCTION OF STRUCTURE
CATEGORY
• Occupancies having surgery and emergency treatment
areas,
• Fire and police Stations.
• Garages and shelters for emergency vehicles and emergency
aircraft.
• Structures and shelters in emergency preparedness centers.
• Aviation control towers,
• Structures and equipment in communication centers and

other facilities required for emergency response
I. Essential Facilities • Facilities for standby power-generating equipment for

Category I structures,
• Tanks or other structures containing housing or supporting
water or other fire-suppression material or equipment
required for the protection of Category J, Il or Ill, IV and V
structures
• Public school buildings.
• Hospitals,
• Designated evacuation centers and
• Power and communication transmission lines.
• Occupancies and structures housing or supporting toxic or

explosive chemicals or substances,
II. Hazardous Facilities
• Non-building structures storing, supporting or containing
quantities of toxic or explosive substances.
• Buildings with an assembly room with an occupant capacity of
III. Special Occupancy 1,000 or more,
Structures • Educational buildings such as museums, libraries, auditorium
with a capacity of 300 or more occupants.
153
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
• Buildings used for college or adult education with a capacity of
500 or more occupants.
• Institutional buildings with 50 or more incapacitated patients,
but not included in Category I.
• Mental hospitals, sanitariums, jails, prisons and other buildings
where personal liberties of inmates are similarly restrained.
• Churches. Mosques, and other Religion Facilities.
• All Structures with an occupancy of 5,000 or more persons,
• Structures and equipment in power-generating stations. and

other public utility facilities not included in Category I or
Category ll, and required for continued operation.
IV. Standard
• All structures housing occupancies or having functions not listed
Occupancy
in Category I, II or III and Category V.
Structures
V. Miscellaneous
• Private garages. carports, sheds and fences over 1.5m high.
Structures
Table 3.29: Table 103-1 Occupancy Category according to NSCP 2015
SEISMIC IMPORTANCE FACTOR, I
The project is in Category I Essential Facilities with seismic importance factor 1.50.
Seismic Importance Seismic Importance2

Occupancy Category
Factor, I Factor, Ip
I. Essential Facilities3 1.50 1.50
II. Hazardous Facilities 1.25 1.50
III. Special Occupancy

1.00 1.00
Structures
IV. Standard Occupancy
1.00 1.00
Structures
154
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
V. Miscellaneous
1.00 1.00
Structures
Table 3.30: Table 208-1 Seismic Importance Factors according to NSCP 2015
SOIL PROFILE TYPE
Based on the Geotechnical Report conducted near the University Drive, Biñan, Laguna the
soil can be described as very dense soil and soft rock, thus the soil profile type is SC.
Average Soil Properties for Top 30 m

of Soil Profile
Soil Profile Soil Profile Name / Generic Undrained
Type Description SPT, N
Shear Wave Shear
(blows/300
Velocity, Vs (m/s) Strength, Sv
mm)
(kPa)
SA Hard Rock > 1500
SB Rock 760 to 1500
Very Dense Soil and Soft

SC 360 to 760 > 50 > 100
Rock
SD Stiff Soil Profile 180 to 360 15 to 50 50 to 100
SE1 Soft Soil Profile < 180 < 15 < 50
SF Soil Requiring Site-specific Evaluation. See Section 208.4.3.1
Table 3.31: Table 208-2 Soil Profile Types according to NSCP 2015
155
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
NEAR-SOURCE FACTOR, Na
The closest distance to known seismic source is 961m away from University Drive, Biñan,
Laguna. Na is 1.5 for Type A less than 2km.
Seismic Source Closest Distance To Known Seismic Source2

Type ≤ 2 km ≤ 5 km ≥ 10 km
A 1.5 1.2 1.0
B 1.3 1.0 1.0
C 1.0 1.0 1.0

Table 3.32: Table 208-5 Near-Source Factor, Na1 according to NSCP 2015
NEAR-SOURCE FACTOR, Nv
The closest distance to known seismic source is 961m away from University Drive, Biñan,
Laguna. NV is 2.0 for Type A less than 2km.
Closest Distance To Known Seismic Source2

Seismic Source
Type ≤ 2 km ≤ 5 km 10 km ≥ 15 km
A 2.0 1.6 1.2 1.0
B 1.6 1.2 1.0 1.0
C 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0

Table 3.33: Table 208-6 Near-Source Factor, Nv 1 according to NSCP 2015
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT, Ca
For soil type SC in Zone 4, the seismic coefficient (Ca) is 0.40Na.
156
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Soil Profile Seismic Zone Z

Type Z = 0.2 Z = 0.4
SA 0.16 0.32Na
SB 0.20 0.40Na
SC 0.24 0.40Na
SD 0.28 0.44Na
SE 0.34 0.44Na
SF See Footnote 1 Table 208-8

Table 3.34: Table 208-7 Seismic Coefficient, Ca according to NSCP 2015
Ca = 0.40Na
Ca = 0.40*1.5
Ca = 0.6
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT, Cv
For soil type SC in Zone 4, the seismic coefficient (Cv) is 0.56Nv.
Seismic Zone Z
Sol Profile
Type Z = 0.2 Z = 0.4
SA 0.16 0.32Nv
SB 0.20 0.40Nv
SC 0.32 0.56Nv
SD 0.40 0.64Nv
SE 0.64 0.96Nv
SF See Footnote 1 Table 208-8

Table 3.35: Table 208-8 Seismic Coefficient, Cv according to NSCP 2015
157
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Cv = 0.56Nv
Cv = 0.56*2.0
Cv = 1.12
OVERSTRENGTH FACTOR (R) and AMPLIFICATION FACTOR (Ωo) FOR CONCRETE
System Limitation and

Building Height
Basic Seismic-Force Resisting System R Ωo Limitation by Seismic
Zone, m
Zone 2 Zone 4
A. Bearing Wall Systems
• Special reinforced concrete shear walls 4.5 2.8 NL 50
• Ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls 4.5 2.8 NL NP
B. Building Frame Systems
• Special reinforced concrete shear walls or
5 2.8 NL 75
braced frames (shear walls)
• Ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls
5.6 2.2 NL NP
or braced frames
• Intermediate precast shear walls or braced
5 2.5 NL 10
frames
C. Moment-Resisting Frame Systems
• Special reinforced concrete moment
8.5 2.8 NL NL
frames
• Intermediate reinforced concrete moment
5.5 2.8 NL NP
frames
• Ordinary reinforced concrete moment
3.5 2.8 NL NP
frames
D. Dual Systems
• Special reinforced concrete shear walls 8.5 2.8 NL NL
E. Dual System with Intermediate Moment
Frames
• Special reinforced concrete shear walls 6.5 2.8 NL 50
158
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
• Shear wall frame interactive system with
ordinary reinforced concrete moment frames 4.2 2.8 NP NP
and ordinary reinforced concrete shear walls
F. Cantilevered Column Building System
• Cantilevered column elements 2.2 2 NL 10
G. Shear Wall-Frame Interaction Systems 5.5 2.8 NL 50
Table 3.36: Table 208-11A Earthquake-Force-Resisting Structural Systems of Concrete according to
NSCP 2015
OVERSTRENGTH FACTOR (R) and AMPLIFICATION FACTOR (Ωo) FOR STEEL
System Limitation and

Building Height
Basic Seismic-Force Resisting System R Ωo Limitation by Seismic
Zone, m
Zone 2 Zone 4
A. Bearing Wall Systems
• Light steel-framed bearing walls tension-
2.8 2.2 NL 20
only bracing
• Braced frames where bracing carries
4.4 2.2 NL 50
gravity load
• Light framed walls sheathed with steel
sheets structural panels rated for shear 5.5 2.8 NL 20
resistance or steel sheets
• Light framed walls with shear panels of all
4.5 2.8 NL 20
other light materials
• Light-framed wall systems using flat strap
2.8 2.2 NL NP
bracing
B. Building Frame Systems
• Steel eccentricity braced frames (EBF),
moment-resisting connections at columns 8 2.8 NL 30
away from links
• Steel eccentricity braced frames (EBF),
non-moment-resisting connections at 6 2.2 NL 30
columns away from links
• Special concentrically braced frames
6 2.2 NL 30
(SCBF)
• Ordinary concentrically braced frames
3.2 2.2 NL NP
(OCBF)
• Light-framed walls sheathed with steel
6.5 2.8 NL 20
sheet structural panels/sheet steel panels
• Light frame walls with shear panels of all
2.5 2.8 NL NP
other materials
159
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
• Buckling-restrained braced frames
(BRBF), non-moment-resisting beam- 7 2.8 NL 30
column connection
• Buckling-restrained braced frames
(BRBF), moment-resisting beam-column 8 2.8 NL 30
connection
• Special steel plate shear walls (SPSW) 7 2.8 NL 30
C. Moment-Resisting Frame Systems
• Special moment-resisting frame
8 3 NL NL
(SMRF)
• Intermediate steel moment frames (IMF) 4.5 3 NL NP
• Ordinary moment frames (OMF) 3.5 3 NL NP
• Special truss moment frames (STMF) 6.5 3 NL NP
• Special composite steel and concrete
8 3 NL NL
moment frames
• Intermediate composite steel and concrete
5 3 NL NP
moment frames
• Composite partially restrained moment
6 3 50 NP
frames
• Ordinary composite moment frames 3 3 NP NP
D. Dual Systems with Special Moment
Frames
• Steel eccentrically braced frames' 8 2.8 NL NL
• Special steel concentrically braced frames 7 2.8 NL NL
• Composite steel and concrete eccentrically
8 2.8 NL NL
braced frame
• Composite steel and concrete
6 2.8 NL NL
concentrically braced frame
• Composite steel plate shear walls 7.5 2.8 NL NL
• Buckling-restrained braced frame 8 2.8 NL NL
• Special steel plate shear walls 8 2.8 NL NL
• Masonry shear wall with steel OMRF 4.2 2.8 NL 50
• Steel EBF with steel SMRF 8.5 2.8 NL NL
• Steel EBF with steel OMRF 4.2 2.8 NL 50
• Special concentrically braced frames with
7.5 2.8 NL NL
steel SMRF
• Special concentrically braced frames with
4.2 2.8 NL 50
steel OMRF
E. Dual System with Intermediate Moment
Frames
160
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
• Special steel concentrically braced frame 6 2.8 NL NP
• Composite steel and concrete eccentrically
5.5 2.8 NL NP
braced frame
• Ordinary composite braced frame 3.5 2.8 NL NP
• Ordinary composite reinforced concrete
5 2.8 NL NP
shear walls with steel elements
F. Cantilevered Column Building System
• Special steel moment frames 2.2 2.0 10 10
• Intermediate steel moment frames 1.2 2.0 11 NP
• Ordinary steel moment frames 1.0 2.0 12 NP
• Cantilevered column elements 2.2 2.0 NL 10
G. Steel Systems not Specifically Detailed for
Seismic Resistance, Excluding Cantilever 3 3 NL NP
Systems
Table 3.37: Table 208-11B Earthquake-Force-Resisting Structural Systems of Steel according to
NSCP 2015
SEISMIC PARAMETERS
Seismic zone factor Z = 0.4

Seismic source type Type A
Distance to nearest fault line 961 m from WVFS
Soil Profile Type Sc
Importance factor I = 1.5
Over strength factor for steel R = 8.0
Seismic source amplification factor for steel Ωo = 3.0
Over strength factor for concrete R = 8.5
Seismic source amplification factor for concrete Ωo = 2.8
Ct = 0.0853 (metric)
Numerical coefficient to solve for structure Ct = 0.035 (imperial)
period Ct = 0.0731 (metric)
Ct = 0.030 (imperial)
Near source factor, Na Na = 1.5
Near source factor, Nv Nv = 2.0
Ca = 0.40Na = 0.6
Seismic coefficient
Cv = 0.56Nv = 1.12
Structural Period (steel), T T = 0.8856 sec
161
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Structural Period (reinforced concrete), T T = 0.759 sec
Total weight of the structure 140,636.38 kN
Table 3.38: Tabulated Seismic Load Parameters according to NSCP 2015
NSCP 2015 208.5-2.2 STRUCTURE PERIOD
The value of T shall be determined from Method A
For all buildings, the value T may be approximated from the following equation:
𝑻 = 𝑪𝒕 (𝒉𝒏 )𝟑⁄𝟒 (208-12)
where
Ct = 0.0853 for steel moment—resisting frames
Ct = 0.073 1 for reinforced concrete moment— resisting and eccentrically braced frames
Ct = 0.0488 for all Other buildings
Alternatively, the value of Ct for structures with concrete or masonry shear walls may be taken as
𝟎. 𝟎𝟕𝟒𝟑/√𝑨𝒄 .
The value or Ac shall be determined from the following equation:
𝑨𝒄 = ∑𝑨𝒆 [𝟎. 𝟐 + (𝑫𝒆 /𝒉𝒏 )𝟐 ] (208-13)
The value of 𝑫𝒆 /𝒉𝒏 used in Equation 208-13 shall not exceed 0.9.
Use Ct = 0.0731
T = 0.0731(22.65)3/4
T = 0.759 sec
For Steel
Use Ct = 0.0853
T = 0.0853(22.65)3/4
T = 0.8856 sec
162
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
NSCP 2015 208.5-2.1 DESIGN BASE SHEAR
The total design base shear in a given direction shall be determined from the following
equation:
𝑪𝒗 𝑰
𝑽= 𝑾 (208-8)
𝑹𝑻
V = (1.12*1.5 / 8.5*0.759) x 140,636.38
V = 36,624.31 kN
In addition, for Seismic Zone 4, the total base shear shall also not be less than the following:
𝟎. 𝟖𝒁𝑵𝒗 𝑰 (208-11)
𝑽= 𝑾
𝑹
Vmin at Zone 4 = ((0.8*0.4*2.0*1.5)/8.5) x 140,636.38 kN
Vmin at Zone 4 = 15,883.64 kN
The total design base shear need not exceed the following:
𝟐. 𝟓𝑪𝒂 𝑰
𝑽= 𝑾 (208-9)
𝑹
Vmax = ((2.5*0.6*1.5)/8.5) x 140,636.38 kN
Vmax = 37,227.28 kN
The total design base shear is,
V = (CvI/RT) x W = (1.12*1.5 / 8.5*0.759) x 140,636.38
V = 36,624.31 kN
163
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Tables 3.39-40: Calculated Design Base Shear in ETABS
For Steel
V = (1.12*1.5 / 8.0*0.8856) x 140,636.38kN
V = 33,347.77 kN
Vmin at Zone 4 = ((0.8*0.4*2.0*1.5)/8.0) x 140,636.38 kN
Vmin at Zone 4 = 16,876.37 kN
Vmax = ((2.5*0.6*1.5)/8.0) x 140,636.38 kN
Vmax = 39,553.98 kN
The total design base shear is,
V = (1.12*1.5 / 8.0*0.8856) x 140,636.38 kN
V = 33,347.77 kN
Design Base Shear:
36,624.31 − 23,488.19
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = × 100%
36,624.31
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = 35.87%
164
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
NSCP 2015 208.5-2.3 VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION OR FORCE
The total force shall be distributed over the height of the structure in conformance with
Equations 208-15, 208-16 and 208-17 in the absence of a more rigorous procedure.
𝒏
(208-15)
𝑽 = 𝑭𝒕 + ∑ 𝑭𝒊
𝒊=𝟏
Ft = 0.07(0.759)(36,624.31)
Ft = 1,945.75 kN
(𝑽 − 𝑭𝒕 )𝒘𝒙 𝒉𝒙 (208-17)
𝑭𝒙 =
∑𝒏𝒊=𝟏 𝒘𝒊 𝒉𝒊
For Roof Deck
F(RD) = (36,624.31– 1,945.75)(0.2453)
F(RD) = 8,506.5 kN
VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION TABLE
STOREY Wxhx/
W hx Wxhx Fx
LEVEL HEIGHT ∑Wxhx
kN m m kN-m kN
ROOF DECK 19208.29 3.775 22.65 435067.82 0.2453 8506.50
5th FLOOR 22708.05 3.775 18.88 428614.45 0.2417 8380.32
4th FLOOR 22708.05 3.775 15.10 342891.56 0.1933 6704.26
3rd FLOOR 24735.33 3.775 11.33 280127.77 0.1579 5477.09
2nd FLOOR 24735.33 3.775 7.55 186751.77 0.1053 3651.39
GROUND FLOOR 26541.42 3.775 3.78 100193.85 0.0565 1959.00
Total 140636.48 1773647.11 34678.56
Table 3.41: Tabulated Vertical Distributions for Reinforced Concrete
165
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.3.6 WIND LOAD
WIND LOAD
WIND ANALYSIS FLOWCHART
Figure 3.75: Wind Analysis Flowchart
166
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Wind load refers to any pressures or forces that the wind exerts on a building or structure.
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207 A.3 SYMBOLS AND NOTATIONS
B = horizontal dimension of building measured normal to wind direction, in m
b̅ = mean hourly wind speed factor in Equation 207A.9-16 from Table 207A.9-1
b̂ = 3-s gust speed factor from Table 207A.9-1
CP = external pressure coefficient to be used in determination of wind loads for buildings
G = Gust-effect factor
(GCp) = product of external pressure coefficient and gust-effect factor to be used in
determination of wind loads for buildings
(GCpi) = product of internal pressure coefficient and gust-effect factor to be used in
determination of wind loads for buildings
h = mean roof height of a building or height of other structure, except that eave height shall
be used for roof angle θ less than or equal to 10°, in m
K1, K2, K3 = multipliers in Figure 207A.8-1 to obtain Kzt
Kd = wind directionality factor in Table 207 A.6-1
Kz = velocity pressure exposure coefficient evaluated at height z
Kzt = topographic factor as defined in Section 207A.8
L = horizontal dimension of a building measured parallel to the wind direction, in m.
ℓ = integral length scale of turbulence, in m.
p = design pressure to be used in determination of wind loads for buildings, in N/m2
q = velocity pressure, in N/m2
qz = velocity pressure evaluated at height z above ground, in N/m2
V = basic wind speed obtained from Figure 207A.5-1A through 207A.5-1C, in m/s. The
basic wind speed corresponds to a 3-s gust speed at 10m above the ground in Exposure C.
167
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Z = height above ground level, in m
Zg = nominal height of the atmospheric boundary layer used in this code. Values appear in
Table 207A.9-1
α = 3-s gust-speed power law exponent from Table 207 A.9-1
â = reciprocal of α from Table 207A.9-1
ā = mean hourly wind-speed power law exponent in Equation 207A.9-16 from Table
207A.9-1
The project is under Occupancy category I that has a Basic Wind Speed of 270kph.
Figure 3.76: Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category I Building and other Structures
168
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STRUCTURE TYPE DIRECTIONALITY FACTOR, Kd

Buildings
Main Wind Force Resisting System 0.85
Components and Cladding 0.85
0.85
Arched Roofs
Chimneys, Tanks, and Similar Structures
Square 0.90
Hexagonal 0.95
Round 0.95
Solid Freestanding Walls and Solid 0.85

Freestanding and Attached Signs
0.85
Open Signs and Lattice Framework
Trusses Towers
Triangular, square, rectangular 0.85
All other cross sections 0.95
Table 3.43: Table 207 A.6-1 Wind Directionality Factor, Kd according to NSCP 2015
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207A.7.3 EXPOSURE CATEGORIES
Exposure B: For buildings with a mean roof height of less than or equal to 9 m, Exposure B shall
apply where the ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness B, prevails
in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 450 m. For buildings with a mean
roof height greater than 9 m, Exposure B shall apply where Surface Roughness B
prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 790 m or 20 times the height
of the building, whichever is greater.
169
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Exposure C: Exposure C shall apply for all cases where Exposures B or D do not apply.
Exposure D: Exposure D shall apply where the ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface
Roughness D, prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 1500 m or
20 times the building height, whichever is greater. Exposure D shall also apply where
the ground surface roughness immediately upwind of the site is exposure B or C, and
the site is within a distance of 180 m or 20 times the building height, whichever is
greater, from an Exposure D condition as defined in the previous sentence.
For a Site located in the transition zone between exposure categories, the category resulting in the
largest wind forces shall be used.
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207. A.8.2. TOPOGRAPHIC FACTOR
The wind speed-up effect shall be included in the calculation of design wind loads by using the
factor Kzt:
Kzt = (1 + K1 + K2 + K3)2 (207 A.8-1)
Where K1, K2 and K3 are given.
If site conditions and locations of structures do not meet all the conditions specified in Section
207 A.8.1 then Kzt = 1.0
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207. A.9.1. GUST EFFECT FACTOR
The gust effect factor for rigid building or other structure is permitted to be taken as 0.85.
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207A. 11.1 INTERNAL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS
Internal pressure coefficients, (GCpi), shall be determined from Table 207A.11-1 based on
building enclosure classifications determined from Section 207A.10.
170
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Main Wind Force Resisting

System and Components and All Heights
Cladding
Enclosed, Partially Enclosed,
Walls & Roofs
and Open Buildings
Enclosure Classification (GCpi)
Open Buildings 0.0
+0.55
Partially Enclosed Buildings
-0.55
+0.18
Enclosed Buildings
-0.18
Table 3.44: Table 207 A.11-1 Internal Pressure Coefficients, (GCpi) according to NSCP 2015
Unless stated, the following parameters below shall be used in computing the wind load.
WIND LOAD PARAMETERS
Location Malamig, Biñan, Laguna
Occupancy Category I. Essential Facilities
Basic Wind Speed, V 270 kph 75 mps
Wind direction factor, kd 0.85 (MWFRS)
Surface roughness C
Exposure category Exposure C
Topographic factor, Kzt 1
Gust effect factor, G 0.85
Enclosure classification Enclosed Buildings
0.18
Internal pressure coefficient, GCpi
-0.18
Table 3.45: Tabulated Wind Load Parameters
171
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
zmin
Exposure α zg â b̂ a̅ b̅ c l (m) ϵ̅
(m)
B 7.0 365.76 1/7 0.84 1/4 0.45 0.30 97.54 1/3 9.14
C 9.5 274.32 1/9.5 1.00 1/6.5 0.65 0.20 152.40 1/5 4.57
D 11.5 213.36 1/11.5 1.07 1/9 0.80 0.15 198.12 1/8 2.13
Table 3.46: Table 207 A.9-1 Terrain Exposure Constants according to NSCP 2015
*zmin = minimum height used to ensure that the equivalent height ̅z is greater of 0.6h or zmin.
For buildings with h ≤ zmin, ̅z shall be taken as zmin.
Wall Pressure Coefficients, Cp
Surface L/B Cp USE With
Windward Wall All values 0.8 qz
0-1 -0.5
Leeward Wall 2 -0.3 qh
≥4 -0.2
Side Wall All values -0.7 qh

Table 3.47: Wall Pressure Coefficients according to NSCP 2015
STRUCTURAL GEOMETRY
WIDTH B 57000 mm
LENGTH L 82000 mm
HEIGHT 1 h1 27000 mm
HEIGHT 2 h2 27000 mm
MEAN HEIGHT h 27000 mm
L/B 1.44
TERRAIN EXPOSURE C α 9.5
zg 274.32
Table 3.48: Tabulated Structural Geometry
172
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
WALL PRESSURE COEFFICIENTS
SURFACE L/B Cp
WINDWARD WALL 1.44 0.8
LEEWARD WALL 1.44 -0.5
SIDE WALL 1.44 -0.7

Table 3.49: Tabulated Wall Pressure Coefficients
Table 3.50: Wind Load Calculation in ETABS
The velocity pressure exposure coefficient Kz can be obtained using the equation:
𝟐/𝒂
𝒛
𝟐. 𝟎𝟏 ( ) 𝐹𝑜𝑟 4.57𝑚 ≤ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑧𝑔 (C207B.3-1)
𝒛𝒈
𝑲𝒛 𝟐/𝒂
𝟒. 𝟓𝟕
𝟐. 𝟎𝟏 ( ) 𝐹𝑜𝑟 𝑧 < 4.57𝑚 (C207B.3-2)
{ 𝒛𝒈
Sample Computation
For 4.57m ≤ z ≤ zg
Kz = 2.01 x (7.7/274.32)2/9.5
Kz = 0.497
For z < 4.57m

Kz = 2.01 x (4.57/274.32)2/9.5
Kz = 0.849
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207B.3.2 VELOCITY PRESSURE
Velocity pressure, qz, evaluated at height z shall be calculated by the following equation:
qz = 0.613KzKztKdV2 (N/m2) ; V in m/s (207B.3-1)
173
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Sample Computation
VELOCITY PRESSURE FOR GROUND FLOOR LEVEL
qz = 0.613 x 0.849 x 1.0 x 0.85 x (75)2
qz = 2.488 kPa
NSCP 2015 SECTION 207B.4.1 ENCLOSED AND PARTIALLY ENCLOSED RIGID BUILDINGS
Design wind pressures for the MWFRS of buildings of all heights shall determined by the
following equation:
p = qGCp – qi(GCpi) (207B.4-1)

Sample Computation
WINDWARD PRESSURES FOR GROUNDFLOOR to 2ND FLOOR
p = ((2.488 x 0.85 x 0.8) – 7.103 x 0.18)/1000
p = 0.000413 kPa
LEEWARD PRESSURES FOR GROUNDFLOOR TO 2ND FLOOR
p = ((2.488 x 0.85 x -0.5) – 7.103 x -0.18)/1000
p = 0.00022123 kPa
FLOOR p p
HEIGHT zg α Kz qz (kPa)
LEVEL (windward) (leeward)
GROUND
3.85 274.32 9.5 0.849 2.488 0.000413 0.000221
FLOOR
2nd FLOOR 7.7 274.32 9.5 0.947 2.777 0.000610 0.000098
3rd FLOOR 11.5 274.32 9.5 1.031 3.021 0.000776 -0.000006
4th FLOOR 15.4 274.32 9.5 1.096 3.213 0.000906 -0.000087
5th FLOOR 19.25 274.32 9.5 1.149 3.367 0.001011 -0.000153
ROOF DECK 23.1 274.32 9.5 2.423 7.103 0.003551 -0.001740

Table 3.51: Tabulated Results of Wind Load Calculations
174
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.4 GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
3.4.1 SOIL REPORT
INTRODUCTION
This report shows the results of the soil investigation performed at the proposed project site in
St. Francis Homes VII, Brgy. San Antonio, Biñan, Laguna with project name Proposed Construction
of Evacuation Center for CY 2021.
The objective of the investigation was to explore the soil conditions at the project site, perform
laboratory testing and evaluation of engineer to provide discussion and recommendations concerning
the general soil conditions at the site of the proposed structure to be constructed.
The subsurface conditions at the site were explored by drilling two (2) test boreholes to 15m
deep each. The test was done by wash boring method with Standard Penetration test and rock curing.
The soils were classified using AASHTO soil classification system.
The site is consisting of medium stiff, very stiff, very dense, dense, medium dense, soft and
very loose. At the time of soil investigation, the ground water level was encountered at 100m deep
below natural grade line.
Selected soil samples retrieved from the boring were tested for natural moisture content, sieve
analysis distribution and Atterberg’s limit.
175
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.77: Geotechnical Investigation from Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH)
Region IV-A. 1st Page
176
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Region IV-A. 2nd Page
177
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Region IV-A. 3rd Page
178
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Region IV-A. 4th Page
179
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
180
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
181
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
182
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
183
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
184
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
185
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.4.2 SOIL BEARING
Soil bearing capacity should not exceed 250kPa.
3.4.3 CONCLUSION
The building should be design for seismic zone 4 with soil type Sc, according to NSCP 2015.
186
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.5 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT FLOW CHART
Figure 3.87: Design Development Flow Chart
187
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.6 FRAME ANALYSIS
3.6.1 IRREGULARITY CHECK
STRUCTURAL IRREGULARITIES
• Re-Entrant Corner Irregularity
Both projections of the structure beyond a re-entrant corner are greater than 15% of the plan
dimension of the structure in the given dimension.
Vertical axis
20m > .15(28.5m)
20m > 4.275m ✓
Horizontal axis
11.5m > .15(41m)
11.5m > 6.15m ✓
Therefore, re-entrant corner irregularity exists.
• Vertical Geometric Irregularity
The horizontal dimension of the lateral-force-resisting system in fourth and fifth floor level is more
than 130% of that in an adjacent.
𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 4𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 82

= = = 1.367
𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 5𝑡ℎ 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑟 𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 60
136.67 > 130%
Therefore, vertical geometric irregularity exists.
188
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Ca = 0.6, Cv = 1.12
Control Period 1
T=0 Control Period 3
Acceleration = Ca T=Ts
Ca = 0.6 Ts = Cv/2.5Ca
Ts = 0.747
Control Period 2 Accelerarion=2.5Ca
T = To Acceleration=1.5
To = 0.2Ts = 0.2(Cv/2.5Ca)
To = 0.2(1.12/2.5*0.6) Control Period 4
To = 0.149 T=T >Ts = 0.759, Acc= Cv/T= 1.476
Acceleration = 2.5Ca
Acceleration = 1.5
T/Ts (sec) ACCELERATION (g)
0 0.6
0.149 1.5
0.747 1.5
0.759 1.476
Table 3.52: Tabulated Design Response Spectra Coordinate according to NSCP 2015
189
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.6.2 MODAL ANALYSIS
Figure 3.88: Modal Case Data
190
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.89: Response Spectrum Function Definition
191
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.90: Function Graph
192
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.91: Modal Participation 1st Page
193
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.92: Modal Participation 2nd Page
194
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.93: Modal Participation 3rd Page
195
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.94: Modal Direction Factors
196
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.95: Balancing Base Shear Reactions
197
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.6.3 DESIGN FLOWCHART FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (USD) AND

STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (LRFD AND ASD)
START
Correct indices
Create Structure and apply releases
Frame in ETABS to intermediate
members
Assign the
Provide the
Properties of the
needed definitions
Structure
Assign the load Input Load

each member of Combinations
the Stucture from NSCP 2015
Analyze the Data Extract the Results
END
Figure 3.96: Frame Analysis Flowchart
198
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
START
Reinforced Concrete Stuctural Steel Design

Design (RCD) (SSD)
Ultimate Strength Design Load and Resistance Allowable Strength

(USD) Factor Design (LRFD) Design (ASD)
Final Reinforced Concrete Final Structural Steel

Design Design
Final Design
END
Figure 3.97: Design Flowchart
199
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.7 REINFORCED CONCRETE DESIGN (USD)
3.7.1 SLAB
3.7.1A SLABS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD)

START
Given: Preliminary Slab Sizes, thickness=225mm, Loadings,

Concrete Cover=20mm, db=12mm
Compute for 𝛽:
𝐿𝑜𝑛𝑔 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝛽=
𝑆ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑠𝑝𝑎𝑛
𝛽 ≥ 2.0 Therefore, One-Way
Compute for 𝑑:
𝑑𝑏
𝑑 = 𝑡 − 𝑐𝑐 −
2
Compute for Load: Temperature Bars

1.2𝐷𝐿 + 1.6𝐿𝐿 𝜌𝑡 = 0.002
𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝜌𝑡 1000 𝑡
At Support
At Midspan Compute for Compute for number of bars:
Compute for moment 𝑊 𝑙 2 𝐴𝑠𝑡
moment: 𝑢 𝑛 , 𝑁=
discontinuous end integral: 16 𝐴𝑏
𝑊𝑢 𝑙𝑛 2 𝑊𝑢 𝑙𝑛 2 𝑊𝑢 𝑙𝑛 2
,
14 10 16
Discontinuous end
𝑊 𝑙 2
unrestrained: 𝑢 𝑛 Compute for spacing:
𝑛
𝐴𝑏
𝑊𝑢 𝑙𝑛2 S= × 1000
Interior span: 16
𝐴𝑠𝑡
𝑆 = 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 (𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠, 5𝑡, 450)

𝑀𝑢
𝑅𝑛 = (∅ = 0.9)
∅𝑏𝑑 2
END
Figure 3.98: Design Flowchart for Slabs by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
200
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑛
𝜌= 1− 1−
𝑓𝑦 0.85𝑓′𝑐
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
Is 𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 Is 𝜌 > 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
NO YES
𝜌 = 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 𝜌=𝜌 NO 𝜌 = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
Compute for 𝐴𝑠 :
𝐴𝑠 = 𝜌𝑑 1000
Compute for number of bars:

𝐴𝑠
𝑁=
𝐴𝑏
Compute for spacing:

𝐴𝑏
S= × 1000
𝐴𝑠
𝑆 = 𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑓 (𝐶𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑠, 3𝑡, 450)
END
Figure 3.99: Design Flowchart for Slabs by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method (continuation)
201
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.7.1B DESIGN CALCULATION
MANUAL COMPUTATION FOR USD SLAB

Slab Designation S-1 ONE-WAY SLAB
Short Span, b 2.55 m Long Span, L 8.94 m
Concrete Cover, cc 20 mm Thickness, h 225 mm
Effective Depth, d 199 mm
Superimposed Dead Load 5.40 kPa ØMain Bar 12 mm
Dead Load 3.07 kPa ØTemp Bar 10 mm
Live Load 4.80 kPa F'c 28 MPa
Wu 17.84 kPa Fy 276 MPa
SUPPORT MIDSPAN
Mu = wL2 /16
Mu = 11.6015 kN-m Mu = 7.2509 kN-m
2
Ru = Mu/φbd
Ru = 0.3255 Ru = 0.2034
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑢
𝜌= 1− 1−
ρ= 0.0012 ρ= 0.0007
1.4
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
𝑓𝑦
ρ min = 0.0051 ρ min = 0.0051
0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝛽1 600
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.75
𝑓𝑦 600 + 𝑓𝑦
ρ max = 0.0377 ρ max = 0.0377

ρ < ρmin < ρmax ρ < ρmin < ρmax
USE = 0.0051 USE = 0.0051
As = ρmin bd
As = 1009.42 mm2 As = 1009.42 mm2
Number of bars, n = As/Ab
n= 9 bars n= 9 bars
Spacing, S = Ab/As × 1000
S= 110 mm S= 110 mm
Spacing Limits
3t = 675 mm 3t = 675 mm
450 = 450 mm 450 = 450 mm
S= 110 mm S= 110 mm
9 - 12mm Ø Top Bars @ 110mm o.c. 9 - 12mm Ø Bottom Bars @ 110mm o.c.
Table 3.53: Design Calculation for S-1 by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
202
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TEMPERATURE BARS
USE ρt = 0.002
At = ρt bt
2
At = 450 mm
Number of bars, n = As/Ab
n = 6 bars
Spacing, S = Ab/As × 1000
S = 170 mm
Spacing Limits
5t = 1125 mm
450 = 450 mm
S = 170 mm
6 - 10mm Ø Temperature Bars @ 170mm o.c.
Table 3.54: Design Calculation for S-1 by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method (continuation)
203
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.7.2 BEAM
3.7.2A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD)

START
Given: 𝑀𝑢 , 𝑉𝑢 , Preliminary Beam Sizes,

and Specifications
Solve for 𝑅𝑢 :
𝑀𝑢
𝑅𝑢 = (𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 ∅ = 0.9)
∅𝑏𝑑 2
Solve for 𝜌:
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑢
𝜌= 1− 1−
𝑓𝑦 0.85𝑓 ′ 𝑐
Solve for 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 : Solve for 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 :

3 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝛽 1.4 𝑓′𝑐
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑜𝑟
8 𝑓𝑦 𝑓𝑦 𝑓𝑦
(whichever is greater)
Is 𝜌 < 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 Is 𝜌 > 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛

NO YES NO
Use 𝜌 = 𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 Use 𝜌 = 𝜌 Use 𝜌 = 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛
Compute for 𝐴𝑠 :
𝐴𝑠 = 𝜌𝑏𝑑
Calculate for 𝑁:
𝐴𝑠
𝑁=
𝐴𝑏
Checking of spacing:
4
𝑠 = max 50, 𝑑𝑏 , 𝑑𝑎𝑔𝑔
3
Compute for the required width:

𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑞 = 2 𝑐𝑐 + 2 𝑑𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑟𝑟𝑢𝑝𝑠 + 𝑁 𝑑𝑏 + 𝑁 − 1 50 A
Figure 3.100: Design Flowchart for RC Beams by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
204
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Is 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑞 > 𝑏
NO YES
One Layer Two Layers
Solve for 𝑎:
𝑁𝐴𝑏 𝑓𝑦
𝑎=
0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝑏
Compute 𝑐:
𝑎
𝑐=
𝛽1
Solve for 𝑓𝑠 :
𝑑−𝑐
𝑓𝑠 = 600
𝑐
Is 𝑓𝑠 ≥ 1000 𝑀𝑃𝑎
NO YES
Revise assumption Initial assumption is correct!

Tension controls
Compute for 𝑀𝑢 :
𝑎
𝑀𝑢 = 𝜙𝑀𝑛 = 𝜙𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦 𝑑 −
2
Is 𝜙𝑀𝑛 > 𝑀𝑢
NO YES
FAIL! SAFE!
Redesign section
(continuation)
205
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Compute for 𝑉𝑢 from design loads
Solve for 𝑉𝑐 :
𝑉𝑐 = 0.17 𝑓′𝑐 𝑏𝑤 𝑑
Is 𝑉𝑢 > 𝜙𝑉𝑐
YES
NO Compute for 𝑉𝑠 :
1
Is 𝑉𝑢 > 𝜙𝑉𝑐 𝑉𝑢
2 𝑉𝑠 = − 𝑉𝑐
𝜙
YES
NO
𝐴𝑣𝑚𝑖𝑛
Use , 𝐴𝑣𝑚𝑖𝑛 is not Compute for 𝑆:
𝑆
0.62 𝑓′𝑐 𝑏𝑤
required 𝐴𝑣 𝑓𝑦𝑡 𝑑
Greater of: 𝑆=
𝑓𝑦𝑡 𝑉𝑠
𝑏𝑤
and 0.35
𝑓𝑦𝑡
If 𝑉𝑠 > 0.33 𝑓′𝑐 𝑏𝑤 𝑑

NO
YES
Identify 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 , the lesser of: Identify 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 , the lesser of:
𝑑 𝑑
𝑜𝑟 600 𝑚𝑚 𝑜𝑟 300 𝑚𝑚
2 4
If 𝑆 > 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥
YES NO
Use 𝑆𝑚𝑎𝑥 Use 𝑆
END
(continuation)
206
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

MANUAL COMPUTATION FOR USD BEAM
Beam Designation G-1 ONE END CONTINUOUS (2nd Floor)
FLEXURAL
Width, b 750 mm F'c 28 MPa
Height, h 850 mm Fy 414 MPa
Concrete Cover, cc 40 mm Φ 0.9
ØMain Bar 20 mm β1 0.85
ØStirrup 16 mm Effective Depth, d 784 mm
SUPPORT MIDSPAN
Mu = 0.13 kN-m (ET ABS) Mu = 862.2785 (ET ABS)
Ru = Mu/φbd2
Ru = 0.00032 Ru = 2.0783
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑢
𝜌= 1− 1−
ρ= 0.00000 ρ= 0.0053
Checking Limits
3 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝛽1
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
8 𝑓𝑦
ρ max = 0.0183 ρ max = 0.0183

ρ < ρmax SINGLY REINFORCED ρ < ρmax SINGLY REINFORCED
1.4
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
𝑓𝑦
ρ min = 0.0034 ρ min = 0.0034
ρ < ρmin < ρmax ρmin < ρ
USE = 0.00338 USE = 0.0053
As min = ρmin bd
A s min = 1988.41 mm2 A s min = 3093.35 mm2
Number of bars, n = As min /Ab
n= 7 bars n= 10 bars
Check if Steel Yields
a = nAbfy /0.85f'cb
a= 51.00 mm a= 72.86 mm
c = a/β 1
c= 60.01 mm c= 85.72 mm
fs = 600(d-c)/c
fs = 7239.28 MPa fs = 4887.50 MPa
fy < fs STEEL YIELDS fy < fs STEEL YIELDS
Check if assumption Tension Controlled is Correct
εs = 0.003(d-c)/c
εs = 0.036 εs = 0.0244375 mm
εs > 0.005 TENSION CONTROLLED εs > 0.005 TENSION CONTROLLED
𝑎
∅𝑀𝑛 = 0.9 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝑎𝑏 𝑑 −
2
ØM n = 621.51 MPa ØM n = 875.07 MPa
Mu < ØMn ADEQUATE Mu < ØMn ADEQUATE
DCR 0.00022 SAFE DCR 0.98538 SAFE
7 - 20mm Ø Top Bars 10 - 20mm Ø Bottom Bars
Table 3.55: Design Calculation for G-1 Beam by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
207
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
SHEAR
Stirrups
Vu = 388.017 kN (ET ABS)
d= 625 mm
Vc = 0.17λ√f'c bd
Vc = 421.667 kN
Ø= 0.75
ØV c = 316.250 kN
1/2 ØV c = 158.125 kN
Vu > ØVc STIRRUPS REQUIRED
Vs = (Vu/Ø)-Vc
Vs = 95.690 kN
SIZE IS ADEQUATE
Av = 201.06 mm2
s = Av fy d/Vs
S= 540 mm
S max = 600 mm
310 mm
n Stirrups = 6 bars
1 - 16mm @ 150mm, 6 - 16mm @ 310mm o.c.
(continuation)
208
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Beam Designation G-5 BOTH END CONTINUOUS (2nd Floor)
FLEXURAL
SUPPORT MIDSPAN
2
Ru = Mu/φbd
Ru = 0.00000 Ru = 3.1545
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑢
𝜌= 1− 1−
ρ= 0.00000000 ρ= 0.00820498
Checking Limits
3 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝛽1
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
8 𝑓𝑦
ρ max = 0.0183 ρ max = 0.0183

1.4
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
𝑓𝑦
ρ min = 0.0034 ρ min = 0.0034
USE = 0.00338 USE = 0.0082
As min = ρmin bd
A s min = 1988.41 mm2 A s min = 4824.53 mm2
n= 7 bars n= 16 bars
a = nAbfy /0.85f'cb
a= 51.00 mm a= 116.58 mm
c = a/β 1
c= 60.01 mm c= 137.16 mm
fs = 600(d-c)/c
fs = 7239.28 MPa fs = 2829.69 MPa
εs = 0.003(d-c)/c
εs = 0.036 εs = 0.0141484 mm
𝑎
∅𝑀𝑛 = 0.9 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝑎𝑏 𝑑 −
2
ØM n = 621.51 MPa ØM n = 1359.17 MPa
209
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
SHEAR
Stirrups
Vu = 582.546 kN (ET ABS)
d= 750 mm
Vc = 506.000 kN
Ø= 0.75
ØV c = 379.500 kN
1/2 ØV c = 189.750 kN
Vs = (Vu/Ø)-Vc
Vs = 270.728 kN
SIZE IS ADEQUATE
Av = 201.06 mm2
s = Av fy d/Vs
S= 230 mm
S max = 600 mm
370 mm
n Stirrups = 8 bars
1 - 16mm @ 110mm, 8 - 16mm @ 230mm o.c.
(continuation)
210
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Beam Designation B-1 SIMPLY SUPPORTED (2nd Floor)
FLEXURAL
SUPPORT MIDSPAN
2
Ru = Mu/φbd
Ru = 0.00000 Ru = 5.2557
0.85𝑓′𝑐 2𝑅𝑢
𝜌= 1− 1−
ρ= 0.00000000 ρ= 0.01453150
Checking Limits
3 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝛽1
𝜌𝑚𝑎𝑥 =
8 𝑓𝑦
ρ max = 0.0183 ρ max = 0.0183

1.4
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑛 =
𝑓𝑦
ρ min = 0.0034 ρ min = 0.0034
USE = 0.00338 USE = 0.0145
As min = ρmin bd
A s min = 572.85 mm2 A s min = 2461.64 mm2
n= 2 bars n= 8 bars
a = nAbfy /0.85f'cb
a= 31.23 mm a= 124.91 mm
c = a/β 1
c= 36.74 mm c= 146.95 mm
fs = 600(d-c)/c
fs = 7304.61 MPa fs = 1376.15 MPa
εs = 0.003(d-c)/c
εs = 0.037 εs = 0.0068808 mm
𝑎
∅𝑀𝑛 = 0.9 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝑎𝑏 𝑑 −
2
ØM n = 109.65 MPa ØM n = 394.75 MPa
Table 3.59: Design Calculation for B-1 Beam by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
211
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
SHEAR
Stirrups
Vu = 273.280 kN (ET ABS)
d= 484 mm
Vc = 152.385 kN
Ø= 0.75
ØV c = 114.289 kN
1/2 ØV c = 57.144 kN
Vs = (Vu/Ø)-Vc
Vs = 211.988 kN
SIZE IS ADEQUATE
Av = 201.06 mm2
s = Av fy d/Vs
S= 190 mm
S max = 600 mm
240 mm
n Stirrups = 6 bars
1 - 16mm @ 90mm, 6 - 16mm @ 190mm o.c.
Table 3.60: Design Calculation for B-1 Beam by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
(continuation)
212
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.7.3 COLUMN
3.7.3A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (USD)
START
Given: 𝑃𝑢 , 𝑀𝑢𝑧 , 𝑀𝑢𝑥 , Preliminary Column

sizes
Solve for 𝐴𝑔 :
𝑃𝑢
𝐴𝑔 =
𝜃0.80(0.85)𝑓 ′ 𝑐 (1 − 𝑝) + 𝑝𝑓𝑦
Solve for 𝐴𝑠𝑡 :

𝐴𝑠𝑡 = 𝐴𝑔 𝜌
Solve for 𝑒
Is 𝑒 < 1.0ℎ
YES NO
Eccentrically Loaded Axially Loaded

Column Column
Solve for 𝜌𝑐𝑎𝑝 :

𝜌𝑐𝑎𝑝 = 𝜃0.80 0.85𝑓′𝑐 𝐴𝑔 − 𝐴𝑠 + 𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦
is pu<pcap
NO YES
CHANGE SECTION IS
SECTION SAFE
END
Figure 3.103: Design Flowchart for RC Columns by Ultimate Strength Design (USD) Method
213
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Rectangular 1800 x 1600 mm 0.60% reinf.
General Information
Column C1
Code ACI 318-14
Bar Set ASTM A615
Units Metric
Run Option Investigation
Run Axis Biaxial
Slenderness Not Considered
Column Type Structural
Material Properties
f'c 28 MPa
Ec 24870.1 MPa
fy 414 MPa
Es 200000 MPa
Section
Type Rectangular
Width 1800 mm
Depth 1600 mm
Ag 2.88e+006 mm2
Ix 6.144e+011 mm4
Iy 7.776e+011 mm4
214
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Reinforcement
Pattern Sides different
Bar layout Rectangular
Cover to Transverse bars
Clear cover ---
Bars ---
Confinement type Tied
Total steel area, As 17419 mm2
Rho 0.60 %
Minimum clear spacing 310 mm
No Pu Mux Muy ɸMnx ɸMny Capacity

kN kNm kNm kNm kNm Ratio
1 1970.45 -744.14 0.00 -6080.55 0.00 0.12
215
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
General Information
Column C11
Code ACI 318-14
Bar Set ASTM A615
Units Metric
Run Axis Biaxial
Material Properties
Type Standard
f'c 28 MPa
fy 414 MPa
Es 200000 MPa
Section
Type Rectangular
Width 1500 mm
Depth 1400 mm
Ag 2.1e+006 mm2
Ix 3.43e+011 mm4
Iy 3.9375e+011 mm4
Reinforcement
Clear cover ---
Bars ---
Rho 0.83 %
216
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

1 1970.45 -744.14 0.00 -5161.28 0.00 0.14
217
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
General Information
Column C19
Code ACI 318-14
Bar Set ASTM A615
Units Metric
Run Axis Biaxial
Material Properties
Type Standard
f'c 28 MPa
fy 414 MPa
Es 200000 MPa
Section
Type Rectangular
Width 2800 mm
Depth 3000 mm
Ag 8.4e+006 mm2
Ix 6.3e+012 mm4
Iy 5.488e+012 mm4
Reinforcement
Clear cover ---
Bars ---
Rho 0.37 %
218
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

1 1970.45 -744.14 0.00 -19131.14 0.00 0.03
219
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.8 STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (ASD)
3.8.1 BEAM
3.8.1A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (ASD)

START
Apply the computed Factored Load
Try a W Shape Section
Compute the Slenderness Ratio and Compactness
Compute 𝑀𝑝 :
𝑀𝑝 = 𝐹𝑦 𝑍𝑥
𝑀𝑝 = 𝑀𝑛
Compute for 𝑀𝑎 :
𝑀𝑛
𝑀𝑎 =
1.67
Is 𝑀𝑎 > 𝑀𝑢
YES NO
END REDESIGN
Figure 3.104: Design Flowchart for Steel Beams by Allowable Stress Design (ASD) Method
220
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

MANUAL COMPUTATION FOR ASD BEAM
Beam Designation G-1 (2nd Floor)
Fy 50 Lb 3.7 m
E 29000 Cb 1.046
Span/L 9.7 m 381.89 in
Mu 689.82 kN-m 508.80 kips-ft
W-Shape W27X84
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 24.7 in2 rx = 10.7 in
d = 26.7 in Iy = 106 in4
bf = 10 in Zy = 33.2 in3
tw = 0.46 in Sy = 21.2 in3
tf = 0.64 in ry = 2.07 in
k = 1.24 in J = 2.81 in4
h/tw = 52.7 Cw = 17900 in6
Ix = 2850 in4 rts = 2.54 in
3
Zx = 244 in ho = 26.1 in
213 in3 wt = 84 lb/ft
Sx =
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λ = h/tw λ = bf/2tf
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
52.70 137.27 7.78 24.08
NON-SLENDER NON-SLENDER
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
52.70 90.55 7.78 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
Table 3.61: Design Calculation for G-1 Beam by Allowable Strength Design (ASD) Method
221
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
LATERAL TORSIONAL BUCKLING

Lb Lp Lr
12.14 ft 7.31 ft 20.83 ft
Lp < Lb < Lr
INELASTIC LTB
ADEQUACY
Cb = 1.046
Fcr = 18.410
PLASTIC MOMENT, M p = 1016.667
NOMINAL MOMENT, M n = 3467.787
USE = 1016.667
Ma = 0.6Mn
ALLOWABLE STESS DESIGN, M a = 610.00
ALLOWABLE STRESS DESIGN
Mu Ma
<
508.800 kips-ft 610.000 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
(continuation)
tf=0.64 in
d=26.7 in h X
tw=0.46 in
bf=10 in
222
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Beam Designation G-5 Fully Braced (2nd Floor)
Fy 50
E 29000
Span/L 9.7 m 381.89 in
Mu 1804.33 kN-m 1330.81 kips-ft
W-Shape W40X297
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 87.3 in2 rx = 16.3 in
d = 39.8 in Iy = 1090 in4
bf = 15.8 in Zy = 215 in3
tw = 0.93 in Sy = 138 in3
tf = 1.65 in ry = 3.54 in
k = 2.83 in J = 61.2 in4
h/tw = 36.8 Cw = 399000 in6
Ix = 23200 in4 rts = 4.22 in
3
Zx = 1330 in ho = 38.2 in
1170 in 3 wt = 297 lb/ft
Sx =
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
36.80 137.27 4.80 24.08
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
36.80 90.55 4.80 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
223
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
Mp = Fy Zx
Mn = Mp
Ma = 0.6Mn
Mu Ma
<
1330.809 kips-ft 3325.000 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
(continuation)
tf=1.65 in
d=39.8 in h X
tw=0.93 in
bf=15.8 in
224
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Beam Designation B-1 Fully Braced (2nd Floor)
Fy 50
E 29000
Span/L 9.7 m 381.89 in
Mu 731.49 kN-m 539.52 kips-ft
W-Shape W18X130
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 38.3 in2 rx = 8.03 in
d = 19.3 in Iy = 278 in4
bf = 11.2 in Zy = 76.7 in3
tw = 0.67 in Sy = 49.9 in3
tf = 1.2 in ry = 2.7 in
k = 1.6 in J = 14.5 in4
h/tw = 23.9 Cw = 22700 in6
Ix = 2460 in4 rts = 3.13 in
3
Zx = 290 in ho = 18.1 in
256 in 3 wt = 130 lb/ft
Sx =
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
23.90 137.27 4.65 24.08
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
23.90 90.55 4.65 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
Table 3.65: Design Calculation for B-1 Beam by Allowable Strength Design (ASD) Method
(continuation)
225
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
Mp = Fy Zx
Mn = Mp
Ma = 0.6Mn
Mu Ma
<
539.520 kips-ft 725.000 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
Table 3.66: Design Calculation for B-1 Beam by Allowable Strength Design (ASD) Method
(continuation)
tf=1.2 in
d=19.3 in h X
tw=0.67 in
bf=11.2 in
226
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.8.2 COLUMN
3.8.2A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (ASD)

START
𝑘𝐿
Compute the Slenderness Ratio:
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Compute 𝐹𝑒 :
𝜋2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝑘𝐿
𝑟
𝑘𝐿 𝐸
Is ≤ 4.71
𝑟 𝑓𝑦
YES NO
𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.658 𝐹𝑒 𝐹𝑦 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.877𝐹𝑒
𝑃𝑛 = 𝐹𝑐𝑟 𝐴𝑔
𝑃𝑢 =0.6𝑃𝑛
Input 𝑃𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
Is 𝑃𝑢 > 𝑃𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
YES
NO
END REDESIGN
Figure 3.104: Design Flowchart for Steel Columns by Allowable Strength Design (ASD) Method
227
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

MANUAL COMPUTATION FOR ASD COLUMN
Column Designation C-1
Fy 50
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 2055.79 kN 462.14 kips
W-Shape W40X277
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 81.5 in2 rx = 16.4 in
d = 39.7 in Iy = 1040 in4
bf = 15.8 in Zy = 204 in3
tw = 0.83 in Sy = 132 in3
tf = 1.58 in ry = 3.58 in
k = 2.76 in J = 51.5 in4
h/tw = 41.2 Cw = 379000 in6
Ix = 21900 in4 rts = 4.25 in
3
Zx = 1250 in ho = 38.1 in
1100 in 3 wt = 277 lb/ft
Sx =
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λr < λ λ < λr
41.20 35.88 5.03 13.49
NON SLENDER NON SLENDER
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
21.99
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
KL/r min 4.71 𝐸/𝐹𝑦
<
21.99 113.43
INELASTIC
Table 3.67: Design Calculation for C-1 Column by Allowable Strength Design (ASD) Method
228
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 591.659 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.658𝐹𝑒 𝐹𝑦
Fcr = 48.262 ksi
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.877𝐹𝑒 Elastic
Fcr = 518.885 ksi

USE = 48.262 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
NOMINAL STRENGTH, P n = 3933.383 kips
Pa = 0.6Pn
ALLOWABLE STRENGTH, P a = 2360.030 kips
Pu Pa
<
462.142 kips 2360.030 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
(continuation)
tf=1.58 in
d=39.7 in h X
tw=0.83 in
bf=15.8 in
229
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 36
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 5308.09 kN 1193.26 kips
W-Shape W40X211
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 62.1 in2 rx = 15.8 in
d = 39.4 in Iy = 390 in4
bf = 11.8 in Zy = 105 in3
tw = 0.75 in Sy = 66.1 in3
tf = 1.42 in ry = 2.51 in
k = 2.6 in J = 30.4 in4
h/tw = 45.6 Cw = 141000 in6
Ix = 15500 in4 rts = 3.07 in
3
Zx = 906 in ho = 38 in
786 in3 wt = 211 lb/ft
Sx =
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λr < λ λ < λr
45.60 42.29 4.17 15.89
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
31.37
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
<
31.37 133.68
INELASTIC
230
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 290.839 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
Fcr = 34.182 ksi
Fcr = 255.066 ksi

USE = 34.182 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
Pa = 0.6Pn
Pu Pa
<
1193.258 kips 1273.636 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
(continuation)
tf=1.42 in
d=39.4 in h X
tw=0.75 in
bf=11.8 in
231
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 50
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 5718.52 kN 1285.52 kips
W-Shape W40X277
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 81.5 in2 rx = 16.4 in
d = 39.7 in Iy = 1040 in4
bf = 15.8 in Zy = 204 in3
tw = 0.83 in Sy = 132 in3
tf = 1.58 in ry = 3.58 in
k = 2.76 in J = 51.5 in4
h/tw = 41.2 Cw = 379000 in6
Ix = 21900 in4 rts = 4.25 in
3
Zx = 1250 in ho = 38.1 in
1100 in 3 wt = 277 lb/ft
Sx =
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λr < λ λ < λr
41.20 35.88 5.03 13.49
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
21.99
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
<
21.99 113.43
INELASTIC
(continuation)
232
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 591.659 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
Fcr = 48.262 ksi
Fcr = 518.885 ksi

USE = 48.262 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
Pa = 0.6Pn
Pu Pa
<
1285.523 kips 2360.030 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
(continuation)
tf=1.58 in
d=39.7 in h X
tw=0.83 in
bf=15.8 in
233
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.9 STRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN (LRFD)
3.9.1 BEAM
3.9.1A BEAMS DESIGN FLOWCHART (LRFD)
START
Compute the Slenderness Ratio and Compactness
Compute 𝑀𝑝 :
𝑀𝑝 = 𝐹𝑦 𝑍𝑥
𝑀𝑝 = 𝑀𝑛
Compute for 𝑀𝑎 :
𝑀𝑎 = 0.9𝑀𝑛
Is 𝑀𝑎 > 𝑀𝑢
YES NO
END REDESIGN
Figure 3.105: Design Flowchart for Steel Beams by Load Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Method
234
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

MANUAL COMPUTATION FOR LRFD BEAM
Beam Designation G-5
Fy 50
E 29000
Span/L 9.7 m 381.89 in
Mu 1049.57 kN-m 774.14 kips-ft
W-Shape W14X455
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 134 in2 rx = 7.33 in
d = 19 in Iy = 2560 in4
bf = 16.8 in Zy = 468 in3
tw = 2.02 in Sy = 304 in3
tf = 3.21 in ry = 4.38 in
k = 3.81 in J = 395 in4
h/tw = 5.66 Cw = 160000 in6
4
Ix = 7190 in rts = 5.17 in
Zx = 936 in3 ho = 15.8 in
Sx = 756 in3 wt = 455 lb/ft
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
5.66 137.27 2.62 24.08
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
5.66 90.55 2.62 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
235
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
Mp = Fy Zx
Mn = Mp
Ma = 0.9Mn
LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR DESIGN
Mu Ma
<
774.140 kips-ft 3510.000 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=3.21 in
d=19 in h X
tw=2.02 in
bf=16.8 in
236
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 50
E 29000
Span/L 10.4 m 409.45 in
Mu 2221.85 kN-m 1638.77 kips-ft
W-Shape W40X211
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 62.1 in2 rx = 15.8 in
d = 39.4 in Iy = 390 in4
bf = 11.8 in Zy = 105 in3
tw = 0.75 in Sy = 66.1 in3
tf = 1.42 in ry = 2.51 in
k = 2.6 in J = 30.4 in4
h/tw = 45.6 Cw = 141000 in6
4
Ix = 15500 in rts = 3.07 in
Zx = 906 in3 ho = 38 in
Sx = 786 in3 wt = 211 lb/ft
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
45.60 137.27 4.17 24.08
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
45.60 90.55 4.17 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
237
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
Mp = Fy Zx
Mn = Mp
Ma = 0.9Mn
Mu Ma
<
1638.770 kips-ft 3397.500 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=1.42 in
d=39.4 in h X
tw=0.75 in
bf=11.8 in
238
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 50
E 29000
Span/L 8.1 m 318.90 in
Mu 504.49 kN-m 372.10 kips-ft
W-Shape W14X193
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 56.8 in2 rx = 6.5 in
d = 15.5 in Iy = 931 in4
bf = 15.7 in Zy = 180 in3
tw = 0.89 in Sy = 119 in3
tf = 1.44 in ry = 4.05 in
k = 2.04 in J = 34.8 in4
h/tw = 12.8 Cw = 45900 in6
4
Ix = 2400 in rts = 4.59 in
Zx = 355 in3 ho = 14.1 in
Sx = 310 in3 wt = 193 lb/ft
SLENDERNESS
WEB FLANGE
λr = 5.70√E/Fy λr = 1.0√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
12.80 137.27 5.45 24.08
COMPACTNESS
WEB FLANGE
λp = 3.76√E/Fy λp = 0.38√E/Fy
λ λp λ λp
λ < λp λ < λp
12.80 90.55 5.45 9.15
COMPACT COMPACT
239
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
Mp = Fy Zx
Mn = Mp
Ma = 0.9Mn
Mu Ma
<
372.100 kips-ft 1331.250 kips-ft
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=1.44 in
d=15.5 in h X
tw=0.89 in
bf=15.7 in
240
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.9.2 COLUMN
3.9.2A COLUMNS DESIGN FLOWCHART (LRFD)

START
𝑘𝐿
Compute the Slenderness Ratio:
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Compute 𝐹𝑒 :
𝜋2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝑘𝐿
𝑟
𝑘𝐿 𝐸
Is ≤ 4.71
𝑟 𝑓𝑦
YES NO
𝐹𝑦
𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.658 𝐹𝑒 𝐹𝑦 𝐹𝑐𝑟 = 0.877𝐹𝑒
𝑃𝑛 = 𝐹𝑐𝑟 𝐴𝑔
𝑃𝑢 =0.9𝑃𝑛
Input 𝑃𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
Is 𝑃𝑢 > 𝑃𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑢𝑎𝑙
YES
NO
END REDESIGN
Figure 3.: Design Flowchart for Steel Columns by Load And Resistance Factor Design (LRFD)
Method
241
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 50
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 8209.40 kN 1845.47 kips
W-Shape W40X167
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 49.3 in2 rx = 15.3 in
d = 38.6 in Iy = 283 in4
bf = 11.8 in Zy = 76 in3
tw = 0.65 in Sy = 47.9 in3
tf = 1.03 in ry = 2.4 in
k = 2.21 in J = 14 in4
h/tw = 52.6 Cw = 99700 in6
4
Ix = 11600 in rts = 2.98 in
Zx = 693 in3 ho = 37.6 in
600 in3 wt = 167 lb/ft
Sx =
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λr < λ λ < λr
52.60 35.88 5.76 13.49
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
32.81
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
<
32.81 113.43
INELASTIC
242
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 265.906 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
Fcr = 46.216 ksi
Fcr = 233.199 ksi

USE = 46.216 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
Pa = 0.9Pn
Pu Pa
<
1845.473 kips 2050.592 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=1.03 in
d=38.6 in h X
tw=0.65 in
bf=11.8 in
243
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Fy 50
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 13739.28 kN 3088.59 kips
W-Shape W14X283
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 83.3 in2 rx = 6.79 in
d = 16.7 in Iy = 1440 in4
bf = 16.1 in Zy = 274 in3
tw = 1.29 in Sy = 179 in3
tf = 2.07 in ry = 4.17 in
k = 2.67 in J = 104 in4
h/tw = 8.84 Cw = 77700 in6
Ix = 3840 in4 rts = 4.8 in
3
Zx = 542 in ho = 14.6 in
Sx = 459 in3 wt = 283 lb/ft
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
8.84 35.88 3.89 13.49
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
18.88
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
<
18.88 113.43
INELASTIC
244
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 802.744 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
Fcr = 48.713 ksi
Fcr = 704.007 ksi

USE = 48.713 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
Pa = 0.9Pn
Pu Pa
<
3088.591 kips 3652.040 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=2.07 in
d=16.7 in h X
tw=1.29 in
bf=16.1 in
245
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Fy 50
E 29000
Span 4m 157.48 in
Pu 7156.17 kN 1608.71 kips
W-Shape W14X159
SECTION PROPERTIES
A = 46.7 in2 rx = 6.38 in
d = 15 in Iy = 748 in4
bf = 15.6 in Zy = 146 in3
tw = 0.745 in Sy = 96.2 in3
tf = 1.19 in ry = 4 in
k = 1.79 in J = 19.7 in4
h/tw = 15.3 Cw = 35600 in6
4
Ix = 1900 in rts = 4.51 in
3
Zx = 287 in ho = 13.8 in
Sx = 254 in3 wt = 159 lb/ft
LOCAL STABILITY
WEB FLANGE
λr = 1.49√E/Fy λr = 0.56√E/Fy
λ λr λ λr
λ < λr λ < λr
15.30 35.88 6.54 13.49
SLENDERNESS RATIO
KL/r min
< 200
19.69
OK
BUCKLING STRESS
<
19.69 113.43
INELASTIC
246
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ADEQUACY
𝜋 2𝐸
𝐹𝑒 = 2
𝐾𝐿
𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛
Fe = 738.627 ksi
𝐹𝑦
Inelastic
Fcr = 48.603 ksi
Fcr = 647.776 ksi

USE = 48.603 ksi
Pn = FcrAg
Pa = 0.9Pn
Pu Pa
<
1608.706 kips 2042.794 kips
SECTION IS ADEQUATE
tf=1.19 in
d=15 in h X
tw=0.745 in
bf=15.6 in
247
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.10 SHEARWALL DESIGN
The project design doesn't have any shearwall. Thus, shearwall computation isn't necessary.
3.11 FOUNDATION DESIGN
3.11.1 FOUNDATION DESIGN FLOWCHART
START
Foundation Dimension Design
Extract support reactions from

analysis
Compute for the footing area from the allowable

soil bearing capacity
Check Foundation Layout for

footing type
Isolated Footing Combined Footing Mat Footing
Update Foundation Layout
END
Figure 3.11-1: Design Flowchart for Foundation
248
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.11.2 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL
3.11.2A GEOMETRICAL MODEL
Figure 3.: Geometrical Model – USD
Figure 3.: Geometrical Model – ASD
249
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Geometrical Model – LRFD
3.11.2B MATERIAL PROPERTY ASSIGNMENT INPUTS
Figure 3.11-21: Material Property Assignment Input – 1
250
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
251
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
252
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.11.2C SHELL SECTION PROPERTY INPUTS
Figure 3.11-24: Shell Section Property Input – 1
Figure 3.11-24: Shell Section Property Input – 2
253
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.11.3 MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS MODEL
Figure 3.: Mathematical Analysis Model – USD
Figure 3.: Mathematical Analysis Model – ASD
254
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Mathematical Analysis Model – LRFD
3.11.4 BEARING PRESSURE CHECK BY GRAVITY LOADS
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Model – USD
255
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Inputs – USD
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Model – ASD
256
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Inputs – ASD
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Model – LRFD
257
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Gravity Loads Inputs – LRFD
3.11.5 BEARING PRESSURE CHECK BY TRANSIENT LOADS
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Model – USD
258
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Input – USD
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Model – ASD
259
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Input – ASD
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Model – LRFD
260
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Bearing Pressure Check by Transient Loads Input – LRFD
3.11.6 FOOTING DESIGN RESULTS
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Model – USD
261
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Input – USD
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Model – ASD
262
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Input – ASD
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Model – LRFD
263
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 3.: Footing Design Result Input – LRFD
3.12 SERVICEABILITY CHECK
Serviceability refers to the satisfactory function of a structure during its service life. It involves
the structure’s usefulness and stiffness instead of failure due to collapse or strength inadequacy.
Serviceability is also defined in the AISC design guide, as a state in which the function of a building,
its appearance, maintainability, durability, and comfort of its occupants are preserved under normal
usage.
Deflection is the displacement which occurred within a structural member under the influence
of loads. While drift is a lateral deflection which occurs in the building frame from the effects of wind
and/or earthquake.
Two limits are checked under the serviceability, one is from excessive vertical deflection and
misalignment due to gravity loads and the other is for structural drift due to transient loads.
264
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.12.1 DRIFT CHECK
USD SEISMIC DRIFT

Remarks at Remarks at
Drift Limit Story Floor Height Elevation ΔSx-dir ΔSy-dir Δmx-dir Δmy-dir
x-direction y- direction
0.08 ROOF TOP 4 26.5 0.002021 0.000834 0.011320 0.004670 SAFE SAFE
0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.00189 0.000798 0.010580 0.004470 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.001537 0.000698 0.008610 0.003910 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.001102 0.00052 0.006170 0.002910 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.000749 0.000354 0.004190 0.001980 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.000423 0.000212 0.002370 0.001190 SAFE SAFE
0.05 BASEMENT 2.5 2.5 0.000148 0.000066 0.000830 0.000370 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.759 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated USD Seismic Drift Check
265
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
USD WIND DRIFT

0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.000031 0.000007 0.000170 0.000040 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.000026 0.000006 0.000150 0.000030 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.000019 0.000005 0.000110 0.000030 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.000013 0.000003 0.000070 0.000020 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.000008 0.000002 0.000040 0.000010 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.759 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated USD Wind Drift Check
266
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ASD SEISMIC DRIFT

0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.00000026 0.00000008 0.00000150 0.00000050 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.00000026 0.00000100 0.00000160 0.00000600 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.00000026 0.00000100 0.00000160 0.00000600 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.00000027 0.00000100 0.00000160 0.00000600 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.00000027 0.00000100 0.00000160 0.00000600 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.8856 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated ASD Seismic Drift Check
267
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
ASD WIND DRIFT CHECK

0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.003260 0.000012 0.019400 0.000070 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.003299 0.000046 0.019630 0.000270 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.003327 0.000049 0.019800 0.000290 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.003335 0.000082 0.019840 0.000490 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.003342 0.000158 0.019880 0.000940 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.8856 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated ASD Wind Drift Check
268
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
LRFD SEISMIC DRIFT CHECK

0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.000000020000 0.000000200000 0.000001200000 0.000001200000 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.000000016000 0.000000006400 0.000000097000 0.000000038000 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.000000001100 0.000000001600 0.000000006800 0.000000009700 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.000000002100 0.000000005200 0.000000012000 0.000000031000 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.000000001200 0.000000000800 0.000000007100 0.000000004800 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.8856 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated LRFD Seismic Drift Check
269
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
LRFD WIND DRIFT CHECK

0.08 5TH 4 22.5 0.006559 0.000001 0.039030000 0.000006000 SAFE SAFE
0.08 4TH 4 18.5 0.000052 0.000000290 0.000310000 0.000001700 SAFE SAFE
0.08 3RD 4 14.5 0.000022 0 0.000130000 0 SAFE SAFE
0.08 2ND 4 10.5 0.00002 0.000000030 0.000120000 0.000000180 SAFE SAFE
0.08 1ST 4 6.5 0.000027 0.000000026 0.000160000 0.000000160 SAFE SAFE
0.05 BASEMENT 2.5 2.5 0 0 0 0 SAFE SAFE
T = 0.8856 sec
Table 3.: Tabulated LRFD Wind Drift Check
270
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
3.12.2 DEFLECTION CHECK
Reinforced Concrete Design (USD)
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR USD BEAM

Beam Designation B-2
SECTION PROPERTIES
Width, b = 350 mm No. of Compression Bar, nb = 0
Height, h = 550 mm Stirrups Diameter, ⌀s = 16 mm
Bar Diameter, db = 20 mm Clear Span, L = 8.938 m
No. of Tension Bars, nb= 6 bars Steel Cover, sc = 60 mm
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
CONCRETE REBARS
fc' = 28 Mpa fy = 414 Mpa
λc = 24 kN/m 3 Es = 200000 Mpa
EQUIVALENT LOAD FROM ETABS
Uniformly Distributed Load
SDL = 36.97 kN/m
DL = 26.763 kN/m
LL = 42.04 kN/m
Total Load = 105.773 kN/m
Percent Live Load Sustained 40%
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
Maximum Allowable Long Term Deflection = L/240
Maximum Allowable Immediate Deflection under Live Load = L/360
FLEXURAL DESIGN
Effective Depth, d = 490 mm
No. of Rebars, nb = 6 bars
β1 = 0.85
Table 3.122-1: USD Deflection Check for B-2 Beam
271
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Ec = 4700√fc'
Modulus Elasticity of Concrete, Ec = 24870.06 Mpa
Area of Tension Rebar, As = 1884.96 2
mm
Area of Compression Rebar, A's = 0 2
mm
n = Es/Ec
Modular Ratio, n = 8
x = bx(x/2) + (2n-1)(A's)(x-sc) = nAs(d-x)
Neutral Axis, x = 167.21 mm
Icr = (bx^3)/3 + (2n-1)(A's)(x-sc) + nAs(d-x)^2
Moment of Inertia of Cracked Section, Icr = 2124834998 mm4
3
Ig = bh /12
Moment of Inertia of Gross Section, Ig = 4852604167 mm4
fr = 0.62λc√fc'
Modulus of Rupture of Concrete, fr = 3.28 MPa
γt = 275 mm
Mcr = fr(Ig)/γt
Cracking Moment, Mcr = 57.89 kN-m
EFFECTIVE MOMENT OF INERTIA
Maximum Service Moment
MSDL = 369.18 kN-m
MDL = 267.25 kN-m
MLL = 419.81 kN-m
Effective Moment of Inertia
3 3
𝑀𝑐𝑟 𝑀𝑐𝑟
𝐼𝑒 = 𝐼𝑔 + 1 − 𝐼𝑐𝑟 NSCP 2015 Eq. 424.2.3.5a
𝑀𝑎 𝑀𝑎
a.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload

Ie DL = 2052963.537 mm4 Okay!
b.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload + 25% Liveload
Ie DL + 25%%LL = 2126133694 mm4 Okay!
c.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload + Liveload
Ie DL + LL = 2125284105 mm4 Okay!
Table 3.122-2: USD Deflection Check for B-2 Beam (continuation)
272
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
DEFLECTION
I. Immediate Deflection
a.) Deflection Due to Deadload δDL = 103730.49 mm
b.) Deflection Due to Deadload + 25% Liveload δDL+25%LL = 45.79 mm
c.) Deflection Due to Deadload + Liveload δDL+LL = 166.30 mm
Immediate Deflection = 103730.49 mm
II. Short Term Deflection
a.) Initial Liveload Deflection
δLL = δDL + LL - δDL = -103564.20 mm
a.) Initial Deadload Deflection
δDL = 103730.49 mm
c.) Initial 25% Sustained Liveload Deflection
δ25%LL=δDL+25%LL - δDL = -103684.70 mm
III. Long Term Deflection
Coefficient for Infinite Duration, εin = 2
Coefficient for Limited Load Duration, εt = 1.8
ρ' = As'/bd
Compression Steel Ratio, ρ' = 0
λin = εin/(1+50ρ')
Time Dependent Multiplier for Infinite Duration, λ in = 2
λt = εt/(1+50ρ')
Time Dependent Multiplier for Limited Load Duration, λt = 1.8
δLT = 𝛿L + εin δDL + εt δ25%LL
Long Term Deflection, 𝛿L = -82735.68 mm
Actual Long Term Deflection = -82735.68 mm
Allowable Long Term Deflection = 37.24 mm
Remarks ADEQUATE
Table 3.122-2: USD Deflection Check for B-2 Beam (continuation)
273
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Reinforced Concrete Beam B-2 Dead Load – USD
Reinforced Concrete Beam B-2 Super Imposed Dead Load - USD
Reinforced Concrete Beam B-2 Live Load - USD
274
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR USD BEAM

SECTION PROPERTIES
Width, b = 750 mm No. of Compression Bar, nb = 0
Height, h = 850 mm Stirrups Diameter, ⌀s = 16 mm
Bar Diameter, db = 20 mm Clear Span, L = 9.09 m
No. of Tension Bars, nb= 20 bars Steel Cover, sc = 60 mm
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
CONCRETE REBARS
fc' = 28 Mpa fy = 414 Mpa
λc = 24 kN/m3 Es = 200000 Mpa
SDL = 8.59 kN/m
DL = 14.981 kN/m
LL = 9.4 kN/m
Percent Live Load Sustained 40%
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
Maximum Allowable Long Term Deflection = L/240
Maximum Allowable Immediate Deflection under Live Load = L/360
FLEXURAL DESIGN
Effective Depth, d = 790 mm
No. of Rebars, nb = 20 bars
β1 = 0.85
275
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Ec = 4700√fc'
Modulus Elasticity of Concrete, Ec = 24870.06 MPa
Area of Tension Rebar, As = 6283.20 mm2
Area of Compression Rebar, A's = 0 mm2
n = Es/Ec
Modular Ratio, n = 8
bx(x/2) + (2n-1)(A's)(x-sc) = nAs(d-x)
Neutral Axis, x = 264.94 mm
Icr = (bx^3)/3 + (2n-1)(A's)(x-sc) + nAs(d-x)^2
Moment of Inertia of Cracked Section, Icr = 18579270599 mm4
3
Ig = bh /12
Moment of Inertia of Gross Section, Ig = 38382812500 mm4
fr = 0.62λc√fc'
Modulus of Rupture of Concrete, fr = 3.28 MPa
γt = 425 mm
Mcr = fr(Ig)/γt
Cracking Moment, Mcr = 296.29 kN-m
EFFECTIVE MOMENT OF INERTIA
Maximum Service Moment
MSDL = 50.70 kN-m
MDL = 88.42 kN-m
MLL = 55.48 kN-m
Effective Moment of Inertia
3 3
𝑀𝑐𝑟 𝑀𝑐𝑟
𝐼𝑒 = 𝐼𝑔 + 1 − 𝐼𝑐𝑟 NSCP 2015 Eq. 424.2.3.5a
𝑀𝑎 𝑀𝑎
a.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload
Ie DL = 1.91322E+11 mm4 0
b.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload + 25% Liveload
Ie DL + 25%%LL = 1.62441E+11 mm4 0
c.) Effective Moment of Inertia Due to Deadload + Liveload
Ie DL + LL = 88483431992 mm4 0
276
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
DEFLECTION
I. Immediate Deflection
a.) Deflection Due to Deadload δDL = 0.44 mm
b.) Deflection Due to Deadload + 25% Liveload δDL+25%LL = 0.57 mm
c.) Deflection Due to Deadload + Liveload δDL+LL = 1.33 mm
Immediate Deflection = 1.33 mm
II. Short Term Deflection
a.) Initial Liveload Deflection
δLL = δDL + LL - δDL = 0.89 mm
a.) Initial Deadload Deflection
δDL = 0.44 mm
c.) Initial 25% Sustained Liveload Deflection
δ25%LL=δDL+25%LL - δDL = 0.13 mm
III. Long Term Deflection
Coefficient for Infinite Duration, εin = 2
Coefficient for Limited Load Duration, εt = 1.8
ρ' = As'/bd
Compression Steel Ratio, ρ' = 0
λin = εin/(1+50ρ')
Time Dependent Multiplier for Infinite Duration, λ in = 2
λt = εt/(1+50ρ')
Time Dependent Multiplier for Limited Load Duration, λt = 1.8
δLT = 𝛿L + εin δDL + εt δ25%LL
Long Term Deflection, 𝛿L = 2.01
Actual Long Term Deflection = 2.01
Allowable Long Term Deflection = 37.88
Remarks ADEQUATE
277
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Reinforced Concrete Girder G-3 Dead Load - USD
Reinforced Concrete Girder G-3 Super Imposed Dead Load - USD
Reinforced Concrete Girder G-3 Live Load - USD
278
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Structural Steel Design (ASD)
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR ASD BEAM

Beam Designation B-2 SIMPLY SUPPORTED CONDITION
W-Shape W27X84
SECTION PROPERTIES
Area, A = 16000 mm2 Flange Width, bf = 253 mm
Depth, d = 678.4 mm Moment of Inertia at x, Ix = 1186260000 4
mm
Web Thickness, tw = 11.7 mm Moment of Inertia at y, Iy = 44121000 mm4
Flange Thickness, tf = 16.3 mm Clear Span, L = 8.938 m
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
STEEL A36
λs = 77 kN/m3
fy = 248 Mpa
Es = 200000 Mpa
SDL = 29.33 kN/m
DL = 23.51 kN/m
LL = 12 kN/m
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
Maximum Allowable Deflection = L/360
DEFLECTION
δ = 5wL4 /384EI
Maximum Deflection, δ = 22.71 mm
Allowabl Deflection = 24.83 mm
Remarks ADEQUATE
279
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Steel Design Beam B-2 Dead Load - ASD
Steel Design Beam B-2 Super Imposed Dead Load - ASD
Steel Design Beam B-2 Live Load - ASD
280
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR ASD BEAM

Beam Designation G-3 FIXED ENDED CONDITION
W-Shape W14x730
SECTION PROPERTIES
Area, A = 138709 mm2 Flange Width, bf = 454.4 mm
Depth, d = 589.5 mm Moment of Inertia at x, Ix = 5.952E+09 4
mm
Web Thickness, tw = 78 mm Moment of Inertia at y, Iy = 1.965E+09 mm4
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
STEEL A36
λs = 77 kN/m3
fy = 248 Mpa
Es = 200000 Mpa
SDL = 70.79 kN/m
DL = 10.68 kN/m
LL = 34.02 kN/m
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
DEFLECTION
δ = wL4 /384EI
Allowable Deflection = 25.25 mm
Remarks ADEQUATE
281
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Steel Design Girder G-3 Dead Load - ASD
Steel Design Girder G-3 Super Imposed Dead Load - ASD
Steel Design Girder G-3 Live Load - ASD
282
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Structural Steel Design (LRFD)
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR LRFD BEAM

Beam Designation B-2 SIMPLY SUPPORTED CONDITION
W-Shape W14X342
SECTION PROPERTIES
Depth, d = 445.4 mm Moment of Inertia at x, Ix = 2039534000 mm4
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
STEEL A36
λs = 77 kN/m3
fy = 248 Mpa
Es = 200000 Mpa
SDL = 29.33 kN/m
DL = 42.02 kN/m
LL = 42.9 kN/m
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
DEFLECTION
δ = 5wL4 /384EI
Allowabl Deflection = 24.83 mm
Remarks ADEQUATE
283
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Steel Design Beam B-2 Super Imposed Dead Load - LRFD
Steel Design Beam B-2 Live Load - LRFD
Steel Design Beam B-2 Dead Load - LRFD
284
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
DEFLECTION CHECK FOR LRFD BEAM

Beam Designation G-3 FIXED ENDED CONDITION
W-Shape W14X11
SECTION PROPERTIES
Depth, d = 399.3 mm Moment of Inertia at x, Ix = 1107176000 mm4
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
STEEL A36
λs = 77 kN/m3
fy = 248 Mpa
Es = 200000 Mpa
SDL = 25.00 kN/m
DL = 27.71 kN/m
LL = 24 kN/m
DEFLECTION CRITERIA
DEFLECTION
δ = wL4 /384EI
Allowable Deflection = 25.25 mm
Remarks ADEQUATE
285
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Steel Design Girder G-3 Live Load - LRFD
Steel Design Girder G-3 Dead Load - LRFD
Steel Design Girder G-3 Super Imposed Dead Load - LRFD
286
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CHAPTER 4: CONSTRAINTS, STANDARDS, AND TRADEOFFS

4.1 INNOVATION
I. RAINWATER HARVESTING SYSTEM
The term rainwater harvesting system means collecting rain where it falls or capturing the
runoff in a specific town or area. The rainwater collected will be keep in the catchment for direct
used or recharged into the groundwater.
There are different ways of harvesting rainwater, these are collecting runoff from rooftop,
collecting runoff from local catchment, collecting seasonal floodwaters from local stream and
conserving water through watershed management. The collected water can be reused for non-
potable purposes such as toilet flushing, irrigation and cooling towers which is stated in PGBC.
The total amount of water that is received in the form of rainfall over an area is called
the rainwater endowment of the area. Out of this, the amount that can be effectively harvested is
called the water harvesting potential. The collection efficiency accounts for the fact that all the
rainwater falling over an area cannot be effectively harvested, because of evaporation, spillage etc.
A vast news in newspaper, radio, social media and television that the city of Biñan in
Laguna is a flood prone area. Due to the issue, the researchers have come up to the idea of erecting
a hospital with water harvesting system to address the issue about the city being flooded for a
couple of months.
In this project, two water harvesting catchment will be excavated at the ground with a
dimension of 15 m x 15 m and a height of 9 meters each with a total rainfall capacity of 1,896,873.6
liters. The rainwater collected will be keep in the water catchment and will be used to provide
irrigation water to the lot landscape and recharged into the groundwater.
287
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
The following is an illustrative theoretical calculation that highlights the enormous
potential for water harvesting. Considering the project with a roof deck area of 3,349 sq m. Assume
the average annual rainfall in your area is approximately 944 mm or 37.17 inches (Biñan weather
update: Atlas)
Area of plot = 3,349 sq. m
Height of the rainfall = 0.944 m (944 mm or 37.17 inches)
Volume of rainfall over the plot = Area of plot x height of rainfall
Volume of rainfall over the plot = 3349 sq. m x 0.944 m
Volume of rainfall over the plot = 3161.46 cu.m
Assuming that only 60 per cent of the total rainfall is effectively harvested
Volume of water harvested = 3,161,456 liters x 0.6
Volume of water harvested = 1,896,873.6 liters
288
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
II. WALL BOUNDARIES
Wall boundaries are value-engineered solution to the demand of concrete boundary walls for civil
engineering project. These are walls constructed on, above, or over the physical border between two
properties so that it stands on or occupies lot on both properties. Standard height of the boundary wall
ranges between 4ft to 8ft or 1m to 2.4m.
Importance of Boundary Wall
• Boundary walls are constructed to protect the entire property, enhance the attractiveness of the
house, and provide an aesthetic aspect.
• The Boundary wall serves as the initial line of defense against intruders. It helps to demarcate
the property’s boundaries and protects the site from animals, thieves, and other intruders.
• The boundary wall offers the property and its occupants a sense of protection and security.
• Boundary walls and fences define the separating line between one property and another, as well
as the duty that comes with these properties.
• Boundary lines established by walls and fences are essential for preserving a healthy
relationship between neighbours and preventing conflicts.
• Establishing rules and regulations for the look of the neighbourhood as a public amenity.
Considering the project, the boundary wall will be used in the perimeter of the property, and will
serve as protection of the property and separating line between one property and another. It will be
design with the running feet of the boundary wall 210.8m and boundary wall height 1m to 1.5m
289
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
III. LITE BLOCK
Liteblock is made of cement, sand mortar and infused with micro air bubbles. The product is
more durable with 500MPa Tension fibers reinforcement and around 10 % rendering and installation
cost than concrete hollow blocks.
The features of liteblock are easy and fast installation by its lego like appearance, has superior
sound installation, low construction cost, heat thermal installation, lightweight, workable, strong,
durable and eco-friendly approved by berde.
According to Cebu Daily News interview to a CEO of Liteblock, "Liteblock is a lightweight
“eco-friendly” concrete block, that is cheaper, greener, and lighter alternative to hollow blocks, it is
more insulated because it has micro air bubbles that allows for better insulation, thus, helping save
energy."
In this project, Liteblock will be used in the interior walls of the building.
290
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
IV. BIOMIMETIC WIND CONVERTERS
Biomimetic wind converter is made of carbon fiber, it generates power during both the down
stroke and the upstroke, but a rotating blade turbine generates power during the entire rotation. The
two vertical axis wings of the Tyer Wind turbine are 5.25 feet in length (1.6m) that can sweep a total
area of 11.7 feet (3.56m). This relatively compact size is made for residential use. Tyer turbine's rated
power output of 1 kW. It is also said to give off less noise pollution compared to conventional wind
turbines, be safer for migrating birds, less visually obtrusive, and allow for a higher density of turbines
in a wind farm configuration.

291
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
A team of engineers at Tyer Wind decided that hummingbirds could provide insights into a
new wind turbine design by analysed the wing movements of hovering hummingbirds they found out
that their wings followed a three-dimensional figure-8 pattern, with the wings reaching angles of +/-
40 degrees from the horizontal. According to the test results, the data sheet indicates that the turbine's
rated output is 1 kW at a wind speed of 10 m/s (22.3 mph). At that velocity, the wind carries just under
5 kW of power, so this turbine is roughly 20% efficient.
In the project, biomimetic wind converter will be installed in the roof deck to lessen the electric
bill consumption of the hospital.
292
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.2 DESIGN CONSTRAINTS
There are many aspects of any design project that must be considered to determine the
feasibility of a system. These aspects are the constraints of the project. Design constraints are
conditions that need to happen for a project to be successful. Design constraints help narrow choices
when creating a project.
The following are the design constraints to be considered in designing the proposed 5-storey
green building hospital with water harvesting system and biomimetic wind converter:
I. Strength Check (Structural member design)
II. Serviceability Check (Deflection limits and Drift check)
III. Economic Cost (Simple estimate)
IV. Sustainability
V. Environmental
4.2A STRENGTH CHECK
Safety constraints typically include things like requiring interlocks and physical barriers
around moving parts, safeguards concerning electricity and the handling of toxic chemicals, and the
mandatory placement of warning signs.
A factor of safety increases the safety of people and reduces the risk of failure of a product.
When it comes to safety equipment and fall protection, the factor of safety is extremely important. If
a structure fails, there is a risk of injury and death as well as a company's financial loss.
This constraint is consisting of combined stress check for beams and columns of reinforced
concrete design (RCD) and structural steel design (SSD) of which the resulting ratio is compared to
the allowable ratio.
293
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STRENGTH CHECK FOR USD BEAM

Section
Storey Beam Location Mu φMn DCR Remarks
b h
3RD FLOOR B-1 350 550 Midspan 130.96 267.13 0.490251 SAFE
3RD FLOOR G-1 750 850 Midspan 908.20 1066.96 0.851207 SAFE
STRENGTH CHECK FOR USD COLUMN

Storey Column Section DCR Remarks
3RD FLOOR C-1 1500x1400 0.808 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-2 1500x1400 0.878 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-3 1500x1400 0.944 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-4 1500x1400 0.962 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-5 1500x1400 0.509 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-6 1500x1400 0.903 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-7 1500x1400 0.942 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-8 1500x1400 0.968 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-9 1500x1400 0.958 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-10 1500x1400 0.95 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-11 1500x1400 0.896 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-12 1500x1400 0.815 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-13 1500x1400 0.932 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-14 1500x1400 0.933 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-15 1500x1400 0.966 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-16 1500x1400 0.959 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-17 1500x1400 0.951 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-18 1500x1400 0.892 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-19 1500x1400 0.783 SAFE
3RD FLOOR C-20 1500x1400 0.928 SAFE
294
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STRENGTH CHECK FOR ASD BEAM

Storey Beam Section DCR Remarks
3RD FLOOR B1 W27X102 0.962 SAFE
3RD FLOOR G-1 W14X665 0.950 SAFE
STRENGTH CHECK FOR ASD COLUMN

Storey Column Section PMM Combo Class DCR Remarks
3RD FLOOR C-1 W14X283 DStlS24 Compact 0.924 SAFE
295
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
STRENGTH CHECK FOR LRFD BEAM

Storey Beam Section DCR Remarks
STRENGTH CHECK FOR LRFD COLUMN

Storey Column Section PMM Combo Class DCR Remarks
3RD FLOOR C-1 W14X176 DStlS1 Seismic 0.934 SAFE
296
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.2B SERVICEABILITY CHECK
Serviceability refers to the satisfactory function of a structure during its service life. It involves
the structure’s usefulness and stiffness instead of failure due to collapse or strength inadequacy.
Serviceability is also defined in the AISC design guide, as a state in which the function of a building,
its appearance, maintainability, durability, and comfort of its occupants are preserved under normal
usage.
Deflection is the displacement which occurred within a structural member under the influence
of loads. While drift is a lateral deflection which occurs in the building frame from the effects of wind
and/or earthquake.
Two limits are checked under the serviceability, one is from excessive vertical deflection and
misalignment due to gravity loads and the other is for structural drift due to transient loads.
Deflection
Beam: G-8 at 4th Floor-LRFD
297
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure 4.1 Top view of the 4th floor with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (LRFD)
Fig. 4.2 Perspective View of Structure with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (LRFD)
298
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Beam: G-8 at 4th Floor-ASD
Figure 4.1 Top view of the 4th floor with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (ASD)
299
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Fig. 4.2 Perspective View of Structure with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (ASD)
Beam: G-8 at 4th Floor-USD
300
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Figure: Top view of the 4th floor with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (USD)
Fig. 4.2 Perspective View of Structure with the Highlighted Critical Member for Deflection (USD)
301
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Summary of Vertical Deflection check for Beams
To summarize the data calculated for RCD and SSD, the following table represents the critical
value for all the design considered in the constraint.
Table 4.57 Summary of Beam Deflection

Deflection Length Allowable
Ratio
(mm) (mm) (L/240)
LRFD 28.2 7925 33.02 0.854
ASD 22 7925 33.02 0.666
USD 2.872 7925 33.02 0.087
Seismic Analysis
Seismic drift limits from NSCP 2015 7th – 2016 ed. Section 208.6.4 states that drift or horizontal
displacements of the structure shall be computed from the maximum inelastic response displacement
Δm caused by the design basis ground motion which shall be determined in accordance with section
208.6.4.2 for both the Allowable Stress Design and Strength Design.
Limitation on Drift:
For Structures with time period T>0.7 limit is 2% (0.02)
For Structures with time period T<0.7 limit is 2.5%
302
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Table Seismic Drift (Ultimate Strength Design)

h Overall
Level Allowable Remarks
(m) Drift
ROOF TOP 4 0.003981 0.08 ADEQUATE
5TH FLOOR 4 0.003715 0.08 ADEQUATE
3RD FLOOR 4 0.002159 0.08 ADEQUATE
2ND FLOOR 4 0.001581 0.08 ADEQUATE
1ST FLOOR 4 0.000838 0.08 ADEQUATE
BASEMENT 2.5 0.000319 0.08 ADEQUATE
Table Seismic Drift (Allowable Strength Design)

h Overall
(m) Drift
Table Seismic Drift (Load Resistance Factor Design)

h Overall
(m) Drift
303
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.2C ECONOMIC COST
Reinforced Concrete Design (USD)
PROJECT TITLE: PORTION CARE - A PROPOSED 5 STOREY GREEN BUILDING

CONVERTER
LOCATION: UNIVERSITY DRIVE, BIÑAN, LAGUNA
Description : SUMMARY OF WORKS
PROGRAM OF WORKS
MATERIAL
COST LABOR COST TOTAL COST
B
A CONCRETE
₱53,952,432.64 ₱21,580,973.06 ₱75,533,405.70
S WORKS
E
REBAR WORKS ₱92,236,564.27 ₱36,894,625.71 ₱129,131,189.97
M
E
FORMWORKS ₱1,476,567.94 ₱590,627.18 ₱2,067,195.12
N
T
G F
R L CONCRETE
₱12,741,729.41 ₱5,096,691.77 ₱17,838,421.18
O O WORKS
U O
REBAR WORKS ₱77,922,885.72 ₱31,169,154.29 ₱109,092,040.00
N R
D
FORMWORKS ₱5,566,090.18 ₱2,226,436.07 ₱7,792,526.25
S F CONCRETE
₱11,262,687.60 ₱4,505,075.04 ₱15,767,762.64
E L WORKS
C O
REBAR WORKS ₱64,592,683.94 ₱25,837,073.58 ₱90,429,757.51
O O
N R
FORMWORKS ₱5,033,811.00 ₱2,013,524.40 ₱7,047,335.41
D
T F CONCRETE
₱10,801,825.86 ₱4,320,730.34 ₱15,122,556.21
H L WORKS
I O
REBAR WORKS ₱54,917,468.94 ₱21,966,987.58 ₱76,884,456.52
R O
D R
FORMWORKS ₱2,523,595.89 ₱1,009,438.36 ₱3,533,034.25
304
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
F F CONCRETE
₱9,504,355.93 ₱3,801,742.37 ₱13,306,098.30
O L WORKS
U O
REBAR WORKS ₱38,204,291.69 ₱15,281,716.67 ₱53,486,008.36
R O
T R
FORMWORKS ₱4,492,446.84 ₱1,796,978.74 ₱6,289,425.58
H
F F CONCRETE
₱9,353,493.13 ₱3,741,397.25 ₱13,094,890.39
I L WORKS
F O
REBAR WORKS ₱38,204,291.69 ₱15,281,716.67 ₱53,486,008.36
T O
H R
FORMWORKS ₱3,665,093.54 ₱1,466,037.42 ₱5,131,130.96
CONCRETE
₱7,482,403.82 ₱2,992,961.53 ₱10,475,365.35
R D WORKS
O E
REBAR WORKS ₱9,095,807.16 ₱3,638,322.86 ₱12,734,130.02
O C
F K
FORMWORKS ₱3,793,456.36 ₱1,517,382.54 ₱5,310,838.90
TOTAL CONCRETE TOTAL REBAR TOTAL

WORKS WORKS FORMWORKS
₱161,138,499.76 ₱525,243,590.75 ₱37,171,486.46
TOTAL STRUCTURAL COST

₱723,553,576.98
Table: Summary of Cost Estimate – RCD (USD)
305
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Structural Steel Design (ASD)

CONVERTER
PROGRAM OF WORKS
MATERIAL
B
STEEL SECTIONS ₱13,664,739.23 ₱5,465,895.69 ₱19,130,634.92
A
S CONCRETE
₱20,457,774.50 ₱8,183,109.80 ₱28,640,884.30
E WORKS
M
REBAR WORKS ₱20,092,749.60 ₱8,037,099.84 ₱28,129,849.45
E
N
FORMWORKS ₱1,729,287.72 ₱691,715.09 ₱2,421,002.81
T
STEEL SECTIONS ₱44,439,306.65 ₱17,775,722.66 ₱62,215,029.30

G F
R L CONCRETE
₱3,283,450.26 ₱1,313,380.11 ₱4,596,830.37
O O WORKS
U O
REBAR WORKS ₱5,778,501.78 ₱2,311,400.71 ₱8,089,902.49
N R
D
FORMWORKS ₱1,729,287.72 ₱691,715.09 ₱2,421,002.81
STEEL SECTIONS ₱44,944,260.39 ₱17,977,704.16 ₱62,921,964.55

S F
E L CONCRETE
₱2,756,224.71 ₱1,102,489.88 ₱3,858,714.60
C O WORKS
O O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
N R
D
FORMWORKS ₱1,432,226.42 ₱572,890.57 ₱2,005,116.98
STEEL SECTIONS ₱41,872,262.23 ₱16,748,904.89 ₱58,621,167.12

T F
H L CONCRETE
₱2,756,224.71 ₱1,102,489.88 ₱3,858,714.60
I O WORKS
306
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
R O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
D R
FORMWORKS ₱1,432,226.42 ₱572,890.57 ₱2,005,116.98
STEEL SECTIONS ₱38,906,573.00 ₱15,562,629.20 ₱54,469,202.20

F F
O L CONCRETE
₱2,483,471.97 ₱993,388.79 ₱3,476,860.76
U O WORKS
R O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,494,390.27 ₱1,797,756.11 ₱6,292,146.38
T R
H
FORMWORKS ₱1,278,545.92 ₱511,418.37 ₱1,789,964.29
STEEL SECTIONS ₱35,716,938.10 ₱14,286,775.24 ₱50,003,713.34

F F
I L CONCRETE
₱2,483,471.97 ₱993,388.79 ₱3,476,860.76
F O WORKS
T O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,494,390.27 ₱1,797,756.11 ₱6,292,146.38
H R
FORMWORKS ₱1,278,545.92 ₱511,418.37 ₱1,789,964.29
STEEL SECTIONS ₱33,845,265.21 ₱13,538,106.08 ₱47,383,371.29
R D CONCRETE
₱2,623,092.49 ₱1,049,237.00 ₱3,672,329.49
O E WORKS
O C
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
F K
FORMWORKS ₱1,425,937.62 ₱570,375.05 ₱1,996,312.66
TOTAL COST OF TOTAL CONCRETE TOTAL REBAR TOTAL

STEEL SECTION WORKS WORKS FORMWORKS
₱354,745,082.72 ₱51,581,194.87 ₱69,478,239.96 ₱14,428,480.81

₱490,232,998.36
Table: Summary of Cost Estimate - STRUCTURAL STEEL ASD
307
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Structural Steel Design (LRFD)

CONVERTER
PROGRAM OF WORKS
MATERIAL
B
STEEL SECTIONS ₱12,862,116.80 ₱5,144,846.72 ₱18,006,963.53
A
S CONCRETE
₱25,288,386.79 ₱10,115,354.72 ₱35,403,741.51
E WORKS
M
REBAR WORKS ₱20,092,749.60 ₱8,037,099.84 ₱28,129,849.45
E
N
FORMWORKS ₱1,729,287.72 ₱691,715.09 ₱2,421,002.81
T
STEEL SECTIONS ₱38,844,127.24 ₱15,537,650.90 ₱54,381,778.14

G F
R L CONCRETE
₱3,283,450.26 ₱1,313,380.11 ₱4,596,830.37
O O WORKS
U O
REBAR WORKS ₱5,778,501.78 ₱2,311,400.71 ₱8,089,902.49
N R
D
FORMWORKS ₱1,729,287.72 ₱691,715.09 ₱2,421,002.81
STEEL SECTIONS ₱36,249,733.46 ₱14,499,893.38 ₱50,749,626.84

S F
E L CONCRETE
₱2,756,224.71 ₱1,102,489.88 ₱3,858,714.60
C O WORKS
O O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
N R
D
FORMWORKS ₱1,432,226.42 ₱572,890.57 ₱2,005,116.98
STEEL SECTIONS ₱33,788,236.93 ₱13,515,294.77 ₱47,303,531.70

T F
H L CONCRETE
₱2,756,224.71 ₱1,102,489.88 ₱3,858,714.60
I O WORKS
308
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
R O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
D R
FORMWORKS ₱1,432,226.42 ₱572,890.57 ₱2,005,116.98
STEEL SECTIONS ₱29,839,645.13 ₱11,935,858.05 ₱41,775,503.18

F F
O L CONCRETE
₱2,483,471.97 ₱993,388.79 ₱3,476,860.76
U O WORKS
R O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,494,390.27 ₱1,797,756.11 ₱6,292,146.38
T R
H
FORMWORKS ₱1,278,545.92 ₱511,418.37 ₱1,789,964.29
STEEL SECTIONS ₱26,298,976.44 ₱10,519,590.57 ₱36,818,567.01

F F
I L CONCRETE
₱2,483,471.97 ₱993,388.79 ₱3,476,860.76
F O WORKS
T O
REBAR WORKS ₱4,494,390.27 ₱1,797,756.11 ₱6,292,146.38
H R
FORMWORKS ₱1,278,545.92 ₱511,418.37 ₱1,789,964.29
STEEL SECTIONS ₱23,010,176.13 ₱9,204,070.45 ₱32,214,246.59
R D CONCRETE
₱2,623,092.49 ₱1,049,237.00 ₱3,672,329.49
O E WORKS
O C
REBAR WORKS ₱4,922,427.44 ₱1,968,970.98 ₱6,891,398.42
F K
FORMWORKS ₱1,425,937.62 ₱570,375.05 ₱1,996,312.66
TOTAL COST OF TOTAL CONCRETE TOTAL REBAR TOTAL

STEEL SECTION WORKS WORKS FORMWORKS
₱281,250,216.99 ₱58,344,052.08 ₱69,478,239.96 ₱14,428,480.81

₱423,500,989.83
Table: Summary of Cost Estimate - STRUCTURAL STEEL LRFD
309
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.2D SUSTAINABILITY
Sustainable development in the construction industry has caused the emergence of sustainable
building or green building. This represents a great opportunity to design buildings that are resource
efficient use less energy, curb wasteful practices from construction, and provide healthier
environments. Green building development involves an integrated approach where building
professionals collaborate closely on achieving sustainable goals and better efficiency in building
projects.
The focus of the project’s sustainability constraint is the recyclability of construction materials,
concrete and steel, at the proposed structure’s end of life stage. The proposed project’s scope of
recyclability includes:
• Recycled weight of the material
• Overall cost of the recycled material
• Energy emission produced by recycling the said construction materials
TOTAL RECYCLED WEIGHT OF MATERIALS

Factor Weight Total Recycled Weight
Material
(%) (kg) (ton)
Reinforced Concrete
0.7 3,401,102.79 2,624.35
(USD)
Structural Steel
0.93 1,918,938.00 1,967.20
(ASD)
Structural Steel
0.93 1,919,833.02 1,968.12
(LRFD)
310
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TOTAL RECYCLED PRICE OF MATERIALS

Price Recycled Weight Total Recycled Price
Material
(php/ton) (ton) (php)
Reinforced Concrete
757.50 2,624.35 1,987,945.96
(USD)
Structural Steel
15,879.60 1,967.20 31,238,314.17
(ASD)
Structural Steel
15,879.60 1,968.12 31,252,884.28
(LRFD)
TOTAL ENERGY EMISSION OF MATERIALS

Factor Recycled Weight Total Recycled Price
Material
(MJ/ton) (ton) (MJ)
Reinforced Concrete
34 2,624.35 89,227.94
(USD)
Structural Steel
1274 1,967.20 2,506,210.00
(ASD)
Structural Steel
1274 1,968.12 2,507,378.94
(LRFD)
4.2E ENVIRONMENTAL
The environmental constraints should be identified and documented as thoroughly as feasible.
And environmental factors should be considered in terms of their potential impact. The following are
the project’s limiting factors:
• Air, water or ground pollution or contamination
The limit factor of water or ground pollution or contamination in water harvesting
system is the maximum amount of pollution or contamination allowed in the water,
which will still be suitable for drinking. The limit factor is usually tested using the
Microbiological Water Quality Test (MWT). If the limit factor is exceeded, the water
is rejected and must be decanted and disposed of. This restriction on the water quality
prevents the build-up of bacteria in the water, which can make it unsafe to drink.
311
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
• Traffic and transport
The construction phase is affected by the quantity of vehicles travelling along the
adjacent roads.
• Preservation of ecology
The natural resources are affected by during construction phase because it need wide
space for constructing the biomimetic wind converter.
• Resilience to climate change
The structure's resilience to probable causes such as severe storms, increased flooding,
rising temperatures, and power outages must be considered.
• Design for deconstruction and disposal
Deconstruction design is an important aspect of green design that considers a structure's
full life cycle. It contains provisions for reusing building components after they have
served their purpose.
312
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.3 TRADEOFFS FOR SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS
A design tradeoff for sensitivity analysis of the proposed project, is required to determine
the overall governing design method using all of the design constraint by assigning an importance
factor. Two materials are considered, reinforced concrete and structural steel. These materials are
designed in three methods: the ultimate strength design for reinforced concrete and allowable strength
design and load and resistance factor design for structural steel.
To determine the governing design for the trade-offs considering a sensitivity analysis table
shall be presented the design criteria (strength, serviceability, economic cost, sustainability and
environmental) with level of importance factor of the constraint defined by the designers with the total
points of 100%.
The following is the equation to be used to determine the raw designer rankings of the design
alternatives as given by Otto and Antonsson’s (1991) model on trade-off strategies in engineering
design with 10 being the highest rank and 0 being the lowest rank.
313
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Strength Check
BEAM STRENGTH CHECK

RCD SSD
STOREY LABEL
USD ASD LRFD
3RD FLOOR B-1 0.49 0.83 0.80
3RD FLOOR B-4 0.47 0.91 0.94
3RD FLOOR B-5 0.49 0.91 0.94
3RD FLOOR B-6 0.85 0.06 0.52
3RD FLOOR B-7 0.49 0.91 0.68
3RD FLOOR G-2 0.85 0.89 0.87
3RD FLOOR G-4 0.85 0.88 0.72
3RD FLOOR G-10 0.85 0.90 0.91
3RD FLOOR G-20 0.85 0.91 0.97
3RD FLOOR G-5 0.85 0.996 0.91
COLUMN STRENGTH CHECK

RCD SSD
STOREY LABEL
USD ASD LRFD
1ST FLOOR C-4 0.97 0.95 0.92
1ST FLOOR C-18 0.97 0.92 0.95
1ST FLOOR C-1 0.96 0.90 0.89
1ST FLOOR C-1 0.96 0.90 0.88
1ST FLOOR C-17 0.96 0.89 0.89
1ST FLOOR C-2 0.95 0.89 0.93
1ST FLOOR C-20 0.95 0.86 0.89
1ST FLOOR C-1 0.94 0.94 0.95
1ST FLOOR C-1 0.94 0.90 0.87
1ST FLOOR C-20 0.93 0.89 0.91
314
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TRADE-OFF FOR STRENGTH

RCD - USD SSD - ASD SSD - LRFD
ELEMENT FACTOR LABEL
Value Rank Value Rank Value Rank
B-1 0.490 3 0.827 1 0.803 2
B-4 0.471 3 0.912 2 0.936 1
B-5 0.490 3 0.908 2 0.942 1
B-6 0.851 1 0.059 3 0.517 2
B-7 0.490 3 0.912 1 0.678 2
BEAM 40
G-2 0.851 3 0.886 1 0.865 2
G-4 0.851 2 0.882 1 0.716 3
G-10 0.851 3 0.897 2 0.905 1
G-20 0.851 3 0.910 2 0.969 1
G-5 0.851 3 0.996 1 0.909 2
C-4 0.968 1 0.950 2 0.920 3
C-18 0.966 1 0.921 3 0.946 2
C-1 0.962 1 0.904 2 0.893 3
C-1 0.959 1 0.896 2 0.878 3
C-17 0.958 3 0.894 1 0.894 2
COLUMN 60
C-2 0.951 1 0.891 3 0.928 2
C-20 0.950 1 0.856 3 0.893 2
C-1 0.944 2 0.936 3 0.946 1
C-1 0.942 1 0.902 2 0.870 3
C-20 0.933 1 0.885 3 0.914 2
OVERALL RANK 1860 2080 2060
315
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Serviceability
TRADEOFF FOR SERVICEABILITY

Criteria Axis Unit Factor Label
Value Rank Value Rank Value Rank
mm 16.67 B2 82735.7 1 27.21 2 23.27 3
Vertical Deflection of Beams -
mm 16.67 G3 2.01 2 1.72 3 6.16 1
X - 16.67 - 0.01132 1 0.0000015 3 0.0000035 2
Seismic Drift
Y - 16.67 - 0.00467 1 0.00000026 3 0.00000036 2
X - 16.67 - 0.00018 3 0.01924 1 0.00822 2
Wind Drift
Y - 16.67 - 0.00004 3 0.00004 2 0.00007 1
TOTAL RANK 183.34 233.33 183.33
Economic Cost
TRADEOFF FOR ESTIMATE COSTS

Criteria Unit
Price Rank Price Rank Price Rank
Material Cost Php ₱516,823,983.56 1 ₱350,166,427.40 2 ₱302,500,707.02 3
Labor Cost Php ₱206,729,593.42 1 ₱140,066,570.96 2 ₱121,000,282.81 3
Total Construction Cost Php ₱723,553,576.98
1 ₱490,232,998.36
2 ₱423,500,989.83
3
TOTAL RANK 1 2 3
316
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Sustainability
TRADEOFF FOR SUSTAINABILITY

Sustainability RCD - USD SSD - ASD SSD - LRFD
Unit Factor
Criteria Value Rank Value Rank Value Rank
Recycled Weight kg/ton 33.33 2,624.35 1 1,967.20 3 1,968.12 2
Recycled Market
php 33.33 1,987,945.96 3 31,238,314.17 2 31,252,884.28 1
Price
Energy Emission MJ 33.33 89,227.94 3 2,506,210.00 2 2,507,378.94 1
Overall Rank 233.33 233.33 133.33
317
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
Tradeoff Analysis
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS 1
IMPORTANCE
CONSTRAINTS UNIT Price Rank Price Rank Price Rank
FACTOR
Strength - 25 1860 8.94 2080 10 2060 9.9
Serviceability - 25 183.34 7.86 233.33 10 183.33 7.86
Estimate Cost Php 20 ₱723,553,576.98
2.91 ₱490,232,998.36
8.42 ₱423,500,989.83
10
Sustainability - 10 233.33 10 233.33 10 133.33 5.71
Environmental - 20 1 10 1 10 1 10
TOTAL RANK 778.20 968.40 901.10
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS 2
IMPORTANCE
FACTOR
Strength - 10 1860 8.94 2080 10 2060 9.9
Serviceability - 15 183.34 7.86 233.33 10 183.33 7.86
2.91 ₱490,232,998.36
8.42 ₱423,500,989.83
10
Sustainability - 30 233.33 10 233.33 10 133.33 5.71
Environmental - 15 1 10 1 10 1 10
TOTAL RANK 744.60 952.60 838.20
318
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS 3
IMPORTANCE
FACTOR
Strength - 15 1860 8.94 2080 10 2060 9.9
Serviceability - 27.5 183.34 7.86 233.33 10 183.33 7.86
2.91 ₱490,232,998.36
8.42 ₱423,500,989.83
10
Sustainability - 27.5 233.33 10 233.33 10 133.33 5.71
Environmental - 15 1 10 1 10 1 10
TOTAL RANK 818.90 976.30 821.68
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS 4
IMPORTANCE
FACTOR
Strength - 30 1860 8.94 2080 10 2060 9.9
Serviceability - 10 183.34 7.86 233.33 10 183.33 7.86
2.91 ₱490,232,998.36
8.42 ₱423,500,989.83
10
Sustainability - 10 233.33 10 233.33 10 133.33 5.71
Environmental - 30 1 10 1 10 1 10
TOTAL RANK 805.00 968.40 932.70
319
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
TRADEOFF ANALYSIS 4
IMPORTANCE
FACTOR
Strength - 25 1860 8.94 2080 10 2060 9.9
Serviceability - 15 183.34 7.86 233.33 10 183.33 7.86
2.91 ₱490,232,998.36
8.42 ₱423,500,989.83
10
Sustainability - 15 233.33 10 233.33 10 133.33 5.71
Environmental - 15 1 10 1 10 1 10
TOTAL RANK 699.60 868.40 801.05
SUMMARY OF TRADE OFF

Trade-off RCD SSD
Number USD ASD LRFD
1 778.2 968.4 901.1
2 744.6 952.6 838.2
3 818.9 976.3 821.68
4 805 968.4 932.7
5 699.6 868.4 801.05
AVERAGE 769.26 946.82 858.95
320
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
321
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.4 CODES, STANDARDS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRAINTS
The following are the codes, standards, and links used:
• National Structural Code of the Philippines (NSCP)
• National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP)
• Philippine Green Building Code
• The American Standards for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
• American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
• The American Concrete Institute (ACI)
• Simplified Construction Estimate by Max B. Fajardo Jr.
• https://www.aisc.org/why
steel/sustainability/?fbclid=IwAR3c48go%02ltIDOOeMMw39REufBvAlZFziT44Pm
7ZfPf7CIVZfE1HItwbrn4#29350
• https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Constraints_on_construction_projects
322
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
4.5 OVERALL WINNING DESIGN
Based on the analysis and interpretation for the overall winning design as described in the
sensitivity analysis, Allowable Strength Design of Steel governs among all the other design
alternatives considered.
On the first Trade-off it shows that among all other design alternatives, ASD governs with a total
rank of 968.4.
On the second Trade-off it shows that among all other design alternatives, ASD governs with a total
rank of 952.6.
On the third Trade-off it shows that among all other design alternatives, ASD governs with a total
rank of 976.3.
On the fourth Trade-off it shows that among all other design alternatives, ASD governs with a total
rank of 968.4.
and Lastly, Trade-off 5 shows that among all other design alternatives, ASD governs with a total rank
of 868.4.
With all trade-offs considered, ASD governs on all design constraints and out of the overall trade-
offs performed.
323
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
CHAPTER 5: FINAL DESIGN

5.1 EXECUIVE SUMMARY
This design follows the standards as set in the codes such as National Structural Code of the
Philippines (NSCP) 2015, National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP) PD 1096, American
Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 14th Edition, and the American Concrete Institute (ACI) 318-
11, the National Building Code of the Philippines and the Association of Structural Engineers of the
Philippines Steel Handbook. The above-mentioned codes governed each phase of the design process,
which is reflected in the design process in Chapter III. Five constraints were considered in this design
project such as Strength Check, Serviceability, Economic Cost, Sustainability and Environmental were
used as trade-off measurements to identify the governing design alternative. Based on the parameters
provided, the project has adequate safety, and the structure has the optimum design.
This project divided into five chapters which Chapter I covers the project background,
objectives, client, and scope and delimitations. Chapter II contains the architectural and structural
schematic plan in the project as well as the preliminary sizes. Chapter III contains the structural
analysis and design, as well as the geotechnical analysis and foundation design. In this chapter also
discussed the analysis with the use of structural software (ETABS 2016 and CSI SAFE 2016) for
assisting in the design process. Chapter IV contains all the constraints, standards, and trade-offs. It was
also discussed the innovation in this chapter. The five constraints were also discussed in the Chapter
IV namely: strength, serviceability, economic cost, sustainability, and environmental are used for the
trade – offs.
324
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
It is the most important section since it incorporates all the details from the preceding chapter
and concentrates on the three design options: Ultimate Strength Design (USD) for Reinforced Concrete
Design, Allowable Strength Design (ASD) for Structural Steel Design, and Load and Resistance Factor
Design (LRFD). The design process began with the comparison of ultimate strength, load resistance
factor, and permissible stress designs. Economic and environmental constraints on material costs After
a series of analysis with respect to the stated constraints, the Allowable Strength Design was chosen
as the governing design method for this project. The design that governs the constraints stated in
Chapter 4 is covered in Chapter 5.
325
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
5.2 FINAL SEISMIC ANALYSIS
A standard building code is used in many countries, including the Philippines. Buildings that
are built according to code can withstand mild earthquakes. There were no collapses, although there
was structural and non-structural damage. The ultimate seismic design for the governing design
alternative is presented by designers.
Table 5.1 Final Seismic Parameters

Seismic Parameters
Occupancy Category I
Importance Factor 1.5
Soil Profice Type Sc
Seismic Zone Factor 0.4
Seismic Source Type A
Near Source Factior (Na): 1.5
Near Source Factior (Nv): 2
Seismic Coefficient (Ca): 0.6
Seismic Coefficient (Cv): 1.12
Response Modification Factor (R): 8.5
Building Height (H) 26.5
Structural Period (T) 0.886
Table 5.2 Final Base Shear Calculations

Final Base Shear
Dead Load 166366.6008
Live load 79485.598
Superimposed Dead Load 163650.069
EQ 78108.218
Base Shear 19.07%
326
CE CAPSTONE 2
CHAPTER 5
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
327
CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital
APPENDICES
328
REFERENCES:
1. Biomimic wind turbine: What's all the flap about? by TomLombardo. (n.d.). Engineering.com.
https://www.engineering.com/story/biomimic-wind-turbine-whats-all-the-flap-about
2. Cinco, M. (2020, November 24). Laguna de Bay shore villages still flooded.
INQUIRER.net. https://www.google.com/amp/s/newsinfo.inquirer.net/1363999/laguna-lakeshore-
villages-still-underwater/amp
3. Editorial Staff. (2021, August 23). What is boundary wall, its definition, importance, modern design
ideas, 6 types of outer boundary walls, advantages and disadvantages. Expert
Civil. https://expertcivil.com/boundary-wall/#Definition_of_Boundary_Wall
4. Entrepreneur promotes â??greenâ?? concrete blocks. (2015, March 13). INQUIRER.net.
https://cebudailynews.inquirer.net/52844/entrepreneur-promotes-green-concrete-blocks
5. Inquirer, P. D. (2021, November 13). Alveo continues to prime the south.
INQUIRER.net. https://business.inquirer.net/334317/alveo-continues-to-prime-the-south
6. Nast, C. (2022, January 5). How do you design a better hospital? Start with the light. Wired.
https://www.wired.com/story/how-do-you-design-a-better-hospital-start-with-the-light/
7. Residential turbine design inspired by hummingbird wings. (2017, January 25). New Atlas.
https://newatlas.com/tyer-wind-turbine-hummingbird-
wings/47517/?fbclid=IwAR3k6BODQNelI0ezTNPdtFFt51ws28v7zEwlM8OrPGvAnkERpUwGUb
FpUsk
8. Reyes, D., & Santos, T. G. (2022, January 5). Omicron cases seen topping delta numbers.
INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1536107/omicron-cases-seen-topping-delta-numbers
9. Some barangays in Biñan city have been flooded for four months – Filipino news. (2021, January 8).
Filipino News.https://www.google.com/amp/s/filipino.news/2021/01/08/some-barangays-in-binan-
city-have-been-flooded-for-four-months/amp/

10. Strength Evaluation of Sustainable Concrete with Partial Replacement of Cement by Combination of
Banana Leaf Powder and Cattle Bone Powder Article – Ramya M, Mercy Shanthi R, Suji D.
https://www.ijream.org/papers/ICRTET0155.pdf
11. The Inquirer Bureaus. (2020, August 7). Calabarzon hospitals nearing full capacity.
INQUIRER.net. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1317857/calabarzon-hospitals-nearing-full-capacity
12. What is water harvesting? - Rainwaterharvesting.org. (n.d.). Rainwater Harvesting - Solution to water
crisis - Technology and Systems. https://www.rainwaterharvesting.org/whatiswh.htm
13. Yu Media Group d.o.o. (n.d.). Biñan, Philippines - Detailed climate information and monthly weather
forecast | Weather atlas. Weather Atlas. https://www.weather-atlas.com/en/philippines/binan-climate
14. (2020, January 6). LITEBLOCK. https://www.liteblock.ph/
15. Luzon – Ready mixed concrete prices. (2021, December 10). PHILCON PRICES.
https://philconprices.com/2020/01/luzon-ready-mixed-concrete-prices/
16. Region 4a – Metal works materials prices. (2022, January 11). PHILCON PRICES.
https://philconprices.com/2022/01/region-4a-metal-works-materials-prices/
17. Region 4a – Concreting works materials prices. (2021, August 7). PHILCON PRICES.
https://philconprices.com/2021/08/region-4a-concreting-works-materials-prices/

PAOLO M. AGORILLA
Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP) Manila
Address: 2172 Azucena St. Sta Ana Manila
Tel. No.: n/a
Email Address: : mpagorilla@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +639121428457
CAREER OBJECTIVE
Seeking a career that is challenging and interesting and lets me work on the leading areas of technology, a job
that gives me opportunities to learn, innovate and enhance my skills and strengths in conjunction with company
goals and objectives.
DESIGN PROJECT COMPLETED/ RESEARCH
• ANATOMY OF AN EARTHQUAKE DISASTER (1990 LUZON EARTHQUAKE)

• The Relationship of Safety as Compliance to the Satisfaction of Employees in Anmari Builders Inc.
KNOWLEDGE, SKILLS AND ATTITUDE
Having graduated from TIP with its orientation towards outcome-based education, I have acquired and can
demonstrate the following student acquire outcomes (knowledge, skills and attitudes) necessary to the practice
of the computing profession:
Analyze complex problems and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate for solution.
Use modern techniques and tools of the computing practice in complex activities.
Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities relevant to
professional computing.
SEMINARS AND TRAININGS ATTENDED
• A Guide to Transportation Engineering and Construction Management Program

Webinar
March 26, 2021
• Learning Geotechnical Engineering and Water Resource Engineering

Webinar
December 16, 2020
EXTRA AND CO-CURRICULAR ENGAGEMENT AND VOLUNTEER WORK
• Boyscout of Philippines, Scout Master

• Red Cross Member
• YMCA Member

REFERENCES
Bernadette G. Campo., LPT

Teacher II at Division of Manila
Instructor I at Pamantasan ng Lungsod ng Maynila
09195621331
Rosemel C. Mission
Purchasing Assistant
Gearbulk Coorporation
09178145761
Kamille Nichole Mariano

Accountant
Tritech DMCC
09173763163

JADEL A. ALCANTARA
Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP) MNL
Address: BLDG.3 Unit 219, Centennial Vill. Western Bicutan, Taguig City
Tel. No.: n/a
Email Address: mjaalcantara@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +639056063946
CAREER OBJECTIVE
Seeking to enhance my engineering skills and abilities.
• Analyze complex problems and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate for
solution.
• Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities relevant to
• I always obey first before I make a complain.
• Military Science 3 (Summer Camp Training) Class 14-17

Philippine Navy, Naval Reserve Command, HEADQUATERS NAVAL RESERVE CENTER
NAIONAL CAPITAL REGION
May 5, 2017
• PERFORMANCE RIDERS TRAINING

Dr. Jose Rizal Plaza Calamba Laguna and in behalf of TeamRS Philippines
February 11, 2018
• JAPANESE CUSINE (WASHOKU) TRAINING

TESDA Women’s Center
November 12-16, 2018
• ACIP VIRTUAL CONVENTION CONCRETE FORUM 5.0 SERIES 2

Via zoom Conference
December 16, 2020

JESS ERWIN CHUA BARRIENTOS
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Address: 319 Quintina Street, Sta Mesa, Manila
Email Address: mjecbarrientos@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +639367401981
CAREER OBJECTIVE
To embark on a career that could help develop my knowledge and skills, communication and decision making in the field of
accounting and to attain a position that will benefit my profession and any related works which I can also contribu te to the whole company
and/or institution.
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Tertiary: Technological Institute of The Philippines - Manila

November 2018 – Present
American Concrete Cement Competition – 1st Placer
Dean’s List – 1st sem 2021-2022
Far Eastern University - Manila

June 2015 – October 2016
Technological Institute of The Philippines - Manila

June 2011 – March 2015
Polytechnic University of The Philippines

Bachelor of Science in Mathematics
Secondary: Dominican School Manila

Math and Science Quiz Bee – 2nd Placer
June 2006 - March 2010
Primary: Saint Rita College-Manila

● Civil Engineering background

● Computer literate - Windows OS, Microsoft Office Applications (Excel, Word, PowerPoint)
● Basic Knowledge in structural software (Autocad, ETABS, etc.)
● Good in written and verbal communication skills
● Good in interpersonal and leadership skills
● Positive attitude with good decision-making skills
● Responsible, Flexible, Trustworthy.
● Very willing to be trained; Fast Learner, can work with minimal supervision.

CLAIRE JASMIN A. HIPOLITO
Bachelor of Science Major in Civil Engineering
Address: Phase 7B Blk38 Lot47 Pkg 2 Bagong Silang, Caloocan City
Email Address: cjahipolito@gmail.com
Cellular No.: +639282770946
CAREER OBJECTIVE
Professional and hard-working civil engineering student aim to achieve for my employer through applying the
skills and knowledge I learned in my experience and academics to the field I am in.
• The Assessment of Doha Bakers in Staffing Procedure through fish bone diagram – March 2020
• Earthquake Risk Assessment, A case study on Laoag Earthquake 1983 – May 2021
• Analyze complex problems and identify and define the computing requirements
appropriate for solution.
• Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and
responsibilities relevant to professional computing.
• Knowledgeable in Microsoft Office (Excel, PowerPoint and Word)
• Knowledgeable in AutoCAD
• Good communication skills
LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES
• Association of Civil Engineering Students – Philippine Institute of Civil Engineering SY (2016-2017)

Member
• Association of Civil Engineering Students – Philippine Institute of Civil Engineering SY (2019-up to
present) Member
• Construction Sustainability and Green Civil Engineering

Dr. Teresita Quirino Hall, Arlegui Campus
August 29, 2019
• CEMINAR 101 PART 2: A Guide to Transportation Engineering and Construction Management

Program
Via zoom conference
March 26, 2021

EXTRA AND CO-CURRICULAR ENGAGEMENT AND VOLUNTEER WORK
• An active volunteer/member of KKTK (Kapisanan ng mga Kabataan Tungo sa Kasakdalan) Church

of God (2020-up to present)
REFERENCES
Engr. Gerardo Malab

Program Chair, Civil Engineering Department
Technological Institute of the Philippines - Manila
gerardo.malab@tip.edu.ph/+639159820783

JAZZLENE A. PAYNOR
Address: 959 Valdez St. Sampaloc, Manila
Tel. No.: 8241-7036
Email Address: jhapaynor@gmail.com
Cellular No.: +639157424087
CAREER OBJECTIVE
To develop my professionalism, to discover my strengths and to obtain more challenging and responsible
position where my knowledge, ideas and skills will be fully utilized.
• Okada Hotel Manila: Structural Irregularities for Seismic Analysis (June 2021)
• Portion Care (October 2021)
• Analyze complex problems and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate for solution.
• Use modern techniques and tools of the computing practice in complex activities.
• Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities relevant to
LEADERSHIP ACTIVITIES
• Member of Association of Civil Engineering Students – Philippine Institute of Civil Engineering (SY
2017-2019)
• Member of American Concrete Institute – Philippines T.I.P. Manila Student Chapter (SY 2021-
Present)
• CEMINAR 101: Learning Geotechnical Engineering and Water Resource Engineering

Via zoom Conference
December 16, 2020
• CEMINAR 101 PART 2: A Guide to Transportation Engineering and Construction Management

Program
Via Zoom Conference
March 26, 2021

• VENTURE OUT: After University Webinar
Via Zoom Conference
August 14, 2021
• COME PREPARED: Job Interview Do’s and Don’ts

Via Zoom Conference
August 19, 2021
REFERENCES
Normina Angela H. Aglibut, LPT, MBA

AXA Philippines, Licensed Financial Advisor
0916 983 0731
normina_13@yahoo.com
Herminio A. Ariola
DOE-ITMS, Director
0961 680 5234
hermie.ariola@doe.gov.ph

LAICA POBLETE
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
Technological Institute of the Philippines (TIP) M
Address: 1047 Unit E. Gerardo St. Brgy. 562 Sampaloc Manila
Email Address: mlpoblete@tip.edu.ph
Cellular No.: +639994149792
CAREER OBJECTIVE
Seeking to enhance my skills and knowledge through a continuous process of learning to become successful professional in the field of Civil
Engineering. To obtain an entry-level construction industry position that will not only enhance my skills but also benifit the company
appointing me. To acquire valuable knowledge and skills to complement those I learned from school in the actual field that challenges me to
improve my skills the task alloted to me.
DESIGN PROJECTS COMPLETED/ RESEARCHES
ANATOMY OF AN EARTHQUAKE
Earthquake Risk Assessment, A Case Study on Laoag Earthquake 1983
STRUCTURAL IRREGULARITIES FOR SEISMIC ANALYSIS

A Study About Structural Irregularities of Nicanor Reyes Hall-FEU Complex-June 2021
ON-THE-JOB TRAINING/ PRACTICUM/ INTERNSHIP EXPERIENCE
Summer Job -Trainee

PESO Real
Poblacion 1, Real, Quezon
July 20, 2020 - August 20, 2020
Special Program for Employment of Students
Having graduated from TIP with its orientation towards outcome-based education, I have acquired and can demonstrate the following student
acquire outcomes (knowledge, skills and attitudes) necessary to the practice of the computing profession:
Analyze complex problems and identify and define the computing requirements appropriate for solution.
Use modern techniques and tools of the computing practice in complex activities.
Understand professional, ethical, legal, security and social issues and responsibilities relevant to professional computing.
LEADERSHIP ACTIVITY
Member of American Concrete Institute Philippines-TIP Manila (SY 2016-2017)

Member of Junior Philippine Institute of Civil Engineers - Lungsod ng Maynila (SY 2019-2020)

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

CE CAPSTONE 2
5 Storey Green
Building Hospital

Group 45 Portion Care Caps2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Group 45 Portion Care Caps2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TECHNOLOGICAL INSTITUTE OF THE PHILIPPINES

1338 Arlegui St., Quiapo, Manila

College of Engineering and Architecture

A Capstone Design (CE 509 – CE Projects II)

In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the

Engr. Charmaine Kay Guanlao Engr. Rolls Grant Vasquez

Approved by the Committee on Oral Examination with a final grade of ______.

Engr. Jomari Tan

Panelist, Engr. Jovelyn Argete Panelist, Engr. Judy Ann Lipata

Dr. Gerardo C. Malab

Dr. Marianne L. Yumul EE, Asean Engr

Table 2.1: Minimum thickness of Solid Non-Prestressed One-way Slabs .......................................... 43

1.1 THE PROJECT BACKGROUND

can help lessen the harm to the environment.

compliance with the standard codes and specifications.

the water in the fountain.

1.2 LOCATION MAP

planned Cavite-Tagaytay-Batangas Expressway.

FIGURE 1.1 LOCATION MAP

Project Name: 5-STOREY GREEN BUILDING HOSPITAL

Location: University Drive, Biñan, Laguna

FIGURE 1.2: PROJECT LOCATION BLOW-UP PLAN

FIGURE 1.3 ELEVATION MAP

FIGURE 1.4 PROPOSED LOT’S MEASUREMENT

1.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES

This project intends to:

economic, environmental, health and safety.

such as Revit, ETABS 2016, Microsoft office excel, and Lumion.

Structural Steel Design (SSD)

1.4 THE CLIENT

center, and ADD infirmary and medical missions.

focus more on other aspects of their lives.

1.5 SCOPE AND DELIMITATIONS

and design process.

constraint in doing this project. Also, this project is limited for:

• Architectural Design: Perspectives, floor plans, elevations, sections

• Structural Design: Foundation plan and structural framing plan

• Design of reinforced concrete, structural steel, and foundation design

• Reference materials found on google

mechanical works, the design of vortex and fire protection layout.

CHAPTER 2: DESIGN INPUTS

2.1 ARCHITECTURAL PLANS

2.1.1 VICINITY MAP

2.1.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

2.1.4 FLOOR PLANS

BASEMENT FLOOR PLAN

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

2ND FLOOR PLAN

3rd FLOOR PLAN

4th FLOOR PLAN

5th FLOOR PLAN

ROOF DECK FLOOR PLAN

FRONT VIEW ELEVATION

Figure 2.12: NOT TO SCALE – Front View Elevation

REAR VIEW ELEVATION

Figure 2.13: NOT TO SCALE – Rear View Elevation

RIGHT VIEW ELEVATION

Figure 2.14: NOT TO SCALE – Right View Elevation

LEFT VIEW ELEVATION

Figure 2.15: NOT TO SCALE – Left View Elevation

Figure 2.16: NOT TO SCALE – Longitudinal Section

Figure 2.17: NOT TO SCALE – Cross Section