Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DTT Functionalization of Ag Particles For Conducting Adhesives
DTT Functionalization of Ag Particles For Conducting Adhesives
To cite this article: Cristian S. de Oliveira, Luis T. Quispe, Cristiani C. Plá Cid, Jelver A. Sierra,
Silvio de Barros, A. Mello & André A. Pasa (2017): DTT functionalization of Ag particles for
conducting adhesives, The Journal of Adhesion, DOI: 10.1080/00218464.2017.1288113
Article views: 19
1. Introduction
In microelectronics packaging with tin-lead solders is normally used.
However, lead is harmful to the environment and human being, leading
to a global concern about the search for alternative solders free of this
element [1,2]. Moreover, nowadays microelectronic devices are becoming
smaller and needing fine pitch connections and the current solder alloy
could cause defects such as bridging and solder ball [2]. One potential
alternative for replacement of tin-lead solders is the use of electrically
conductive adhesives (ECAs) composed by a polymeric matrix and con-
ductive fillers that are responsible for the mechanical properties and elec-
trical conduction, respectively [3]. These adhesives are classified according
to the percolation threshold for electrical conduction that is quantified by
the percentage of the volume fraction of filler and varies in the range from
15% to 25%. If the adhesive has an amount of filler smaller than
CONTACT André A. Pasa andre.pasa@ufsc.br Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Física, Campus
Universitário, Caixa Postal 476, Florianopolis, 88040-900 Brazil.
Color versions of one or more of the figures in this article can be found online at www.tandfonline.com/gadh.
© 2017 Taylor & Francis
2 C. S. DE OLIVEIRA ET AL.
2. Experiments
2.1. Materials
Acetone purchased from Química Moderna (Barueri, Brazil), ethyl alcohol
99.5% from Labsynth (Diadema, Brazil), and detergent from Sigma-Aldrich
(São Paulo, Brazil) were used to clean the waste jewelry. Nitric acid (HNO3)
obtained from Labsynth, sodium chloride (NaCl) from Labsynth, and sodium
borohydride (NaBH4) 99% from Sigma-Aldrich were used for recycling silver
powder. Ethanol ≥99.8% purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and DTT ≥99.8%
from Sigma-Aldrich were used for functionalization of silver particles. Epoxy
bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (DGEBA), curing agent tetraethylenepentamine
(TEPA), and solvent isopropyl alcohol 99.5% were purchased from Sigma-
Aldrich and used for the formulation of the polymer matrix. Silver flakes
with an average diameter of 10 μm, 99% of purity, were obtained from
Sigma-Aldrich to be used as filler in the adhesives. Commercial electrical
conductive adhesive Loctite 3880 was purchased from Loctite Co. for elec-
trical and mechanical characterization.
2.5. Preparation of samples for bulk resistivity and shear strength test
For the electrical measurements, the prepared conductive pastes were printed
by screen-printing in a rectangular area defined by a mask tape on a glass
substrate. After removal of the mask, the strips of ICA of length a, width d,
and thickness w are pre-cured at 50°C for 20 min and cured at 140°C for 2
hr. The resistivity of the cured ICA strips was measured using a Keithley
2400 Source Meter with a 4-point probe with a distance s between the tips.
The current (I) is applied between the two outer probes and the voltage (V)
measured between the two inner probes. The electrical resistivity (ρ) is
calculated from the following equation:
ρ ¼ ρs w; (1)
where ρs is the sheet resistivity given by
V a d
ρs ¼ C ; ; (2)
I d s
where C da ; ds is a correction factor dependent on the sample dimensions
and distance between probes [14]. For using Equation (2) the samples
were prepared considering the following restrictions: ds >1, da 4,
and ws <0:4.
For shear strength tests, the samples were made according to the D1002
standard. With the purpose of mimicking practical application, the shear
strength samples were prepared on pieces of FR-1 printed circuit board with
a single coppered face. The test samples were prepared by coating the copper
side of one piece with ICAs paste. The piece with the ICAs is then pressed
against the coppered surface of the second piece with a constant normal force
THE JOURNAL OF ADHESION 5
of 80 N at 50°C during 20 min and 140°C for 2 hr. The shear strength (σ) is
calculated from Equation (3):
f
σ¼ ; (3)
A
where f is the force applied parallel to the surface of the test sample to break off
the bond, and A is the area covered by the adhesive. Tests were carried out
using a testing system Instron 5966 (Norwood, USA) equipped with a 10-KN
load cell.
recycled silver particles. The high contact angle of 108.1° for untreated
commercial silver particles is attributed to the presence of the lubricant
layer. The incubated commercial particles with 10 mM DTT showed a
much lower contact angle of 52.4° indicating the replacement of the lubricant
layer by the thiol molecules, which have hydrophilic groups in its structure
(–SH and –OH). The DTT molecule has two possibilities of assembling on
metallic surfaces, i.e., standing up or lying down. In the standing-up config-
uration, the molecule binds to the surface via one Au-S bond and the other
thiol group remains exposed. However, from the literature the lying-down
configuration is the expected one [15–17].
The results for the contact angle of recycled silver particles, obtained by
following the procedure discussed in Section 2.2, untreated and treated in
0.1 mM DTT show higher angles than commercial Ag treated with 10 mM
DTT. Surfaces with no lubricant or low coverage with DTT explain the
measured angles. However, the higher hydrophilicity of recycled Ag particles
treated with 10 mM DTT with a contact angle of 30.2° shows that the absence
of the lubricant layer allowed an increase in DTT surface coverage. In
addition, the relatively high contact angle of 52.4° for treated commercial
Ag, as discussed above, is an indication that the lubricant was only partially
replaced by the DTT.
The chemical surface composition of recycled silver particles treated with
10 mM DTT was measured with XPS and the results are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. XPS S2p signal of recycled silver particles incubated with 10 mM DTT with the S 2p3/2
signal fitted with three different sulfur species with binding energies of 160.9, 161.8, and 163.4 eV, for
chemisorbed sulfur (S-Ag), surface thiolate (-R-S-Ag), and unbound DTT species (R-S-H), respectively.
THE JOURNAL OF ADHESION 7
A broad S2p signal between 160 and 166 eV is observed and indicates the
presence of DTT molecules on the surface of Ag. The S2p signal has a
doublet structure due to p1/2 and p3/2 levels, with a spin-orbit splitting of
1.18 eV and area ratio of 1:2. The broad peak in the figure can be fitted by
doublets with S2p3/2 binding energy at 160.9, 161.8, and 163.4 eV, corre-
sponding to chemisorbed sulfur (S-Ag), surface thiolate (-R-S-Ag), and
unbound DTT species (R-S-H), as described by Battocchio et al. [18]. The
intensities of peaks at 161.8 and 163.4 eV can provide information about
DTT molecule configuration on the silver surface. The higher intensity at
161.8 eV denotes the prevalence of lying-down configuration because it is
related to -S–Ag covalent bonds relative to the lower intensity at 163.4 eV,
which corresponds to free SH groups, and assigned to standing-up molecules.
For silver particles incubated with 0.1 mM DTT, a weak XPS S2p signal was
observed (data not shown), suggesting that the Ag surfaces are less covered
with DTT molecules; a result that is in agreement with the measured contact
angles values, which are higher when compared to samples treated with more
concentrated DTT solutions, as described above.
Figure 2. SEM results: (a) and (b) are top view images of commercial Ag flakes untreated and
treated with 10 mM DTT, respectively. (c) and (d) are cross-sectional images of the ICAs prepared
with 80 wt % of filler untreated and treated in 10 mM DTT, respectively.
8 C. S. DE OLIVEIRA ET AL.
Figure 3. SEM top view images of recycled samples (a) untreated and treated with (b) 0.1, (c) 1,
and (d) 10 mM DTT.
THE JOURNAL OF ADHESION 9
Figure 4. SEM top view images of adhesives filled with recycled Ag (a) untreated and treated
with (b) 0.1, (c) 1, and (d) 10 mM of DTT.
Figure 5. Cross-sectional view of the adhesive prepared with recycled Ag treated with 10 mM
DTT.
ICAs are comparable to the existing commercial ICAs and to values from the
literature that are in the range of 1–5 × 10−4Ω cm [19, 20]. The ICAs
prepared with recycled Ag fillers treated with DTT showed slightly better
electrical performance than those filled with treated commercial Ag flakes.
The absence of lubricant layer and the smaller size of recycled Ag particles
allowed better coverage with DTT and better dispersion in the adhesive,
which are probably the reasons for the lower resistivities observed.
Figure 7. Shear strength of ICAs filled with 80 wt % of recycled (circles) or commercial (squares)
Ag particles as a function of DTT concentration. The result for the adhesive without filler (up
triangle) is also shown for comparison.
12 C. S. DE OLIVEIRA ET AL.
particles are still in aggregates, as shown in Figures 3 and 4, and for higher
concentrations of DTT the agglomerates are dissolved and the Ag particles are
better dispersed improving the mechanical properties. The higher values of σ for
ICAs filled with recycled Ag treated in 1 and 10 mM DTT solutions relative to
samples of commercial Ag incubated in solutions with same concentration can
be attributed to the superior dispersion of the particles in the adhesive, due to the
better DTT coverage and smaller size. Moreover, the value of σ for the highest
concentration of DTT of 21 MPa is close to the shear strength of adhesives
formulated without filler.
4. Conclusions
Ag particles obtained commercially or from recycled waste jewelry were used
successfully for the preparation of ICAs. The electrical and mechanical properties
obtained in this work are comparable to existing values in the literature. The
coverage of the surface of the Ag particles with DTT improved significantly
the electrical resistivity of the ICAs. The particles from recycled Ag enhanced the
electrical and mechanical properties of the ICAs as a function of the concentration
of DTT in the incubation solution. The better results were for recycled particles
when compared to commercial ones and were attributed to the smaller size and
better DTT coverage due to the absence of lubricant coating of recycled Ag.
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the LCME for the electron microscopy facilities, Prof. R. A. F.
Machado (LCP/UFSC) for the contact angle measurements, and LABMAT/UFSC for com-
plementary shear strength tests.
Funding
This research was supported by Brazilian agencies CAPES, CNPQ, FINEP, and FAPESC.
ORCID
Silvio de Barros http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2520-569X
References
[1] Kang, S. K., and Sarkhel, A. K., J. Electron. Mater. 23, 701–707 (1994).
[2] Abtew, M., and Selvaduray, G., Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 27, 95–141 (2000).
[3] Lu D., and Wong C. Eds, Materials for Advanced Packaging, (Springer, New York,
2009). 1st ed., Ch. 11, pp. 365–405.
[4] Bailey, C., Liu, J., Li, Y., and Wong, C., Soldering Surf. Mount Technol. 18, 33–39
(2006).
THE JOURNAL OF ADHESION 13
[5] Li, Y., and Wong, C., Mater. Sci. Eng. R Rep. 51, 1–35 (2006).
[6] Lovinger, A. J., J. Adhesion 10, 1–15 (1979).
[7] Lu, D., Tong, Q. K., and Wong, C., IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol. 22, 365–371
(1999).
[8] Cui, H-. W., Fan, Q., and Li, D-. S., Int. J. Adhes. Adhes. 48, 177–182 (2014).
[9] Li, Y., Moon, K-. S., Li, H., and Wong, C., 9th International Symposium on Advanced
Packaging Materials: Processes, Properties and Interfaces, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,
March 24–26, (2004), pp. 1–6.
[10] Li, Y., Moon, K-. S., and Wong, C., J. Electron. Mater. 34, 1573–1578 (2005).
[11] Zhang, R., Moon, K-. S., Lin, W., Duan, Y., Lotz, S. M., and Wong, C., IEEE Trans.
Adv. Packag. 33, 892–898 (2010).
[12] Li, Y., Moon, K-. S., and Wong, C., J. Electron. Mater. 34, 266–271 (2005).
[13] Murphy, J., Ackerman, A., and Heeren, J., J. Chem. Educ. 68, 602–604 (1991).
[14] Smits F., Bell System Technical Journal 37, 711–718 (1958).
[15] Banks, J., Yu, T., and Yu, H., J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 3538–3542 (2002).
[16] MacDairmid, A., Gallagher, M., and Banks, J., J. Phys. Chem. B 107, 9789–9792 (2003).
[17] Creczynski-Pasa, T. B., Millone, M. A. D., Munford, M. L., de Lima, V. R., Vieira, T. O.,
Benitez, G. A., Pasa, A. A., Salvarezza, R. C., and Vela, M. E., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.
11, 1077–1084 (2009).
[18] Battocchio, C., Meneghini, C., Fratoddi, I., Venditti, I., Russo, M. V., Aquilanti, G.,
Maurizio, C., Bondino, F., Matassa, R., Rossi, M., Mobilio, S., and Polzonetti, G., J.
Phys. Chem. C 116, 19571–19578 (2012).
[19] Ji, Y-. H., Liu, Y., Huang, G-. W., Shen, X-.J., Xiao, H-. M., and Fu, S-. Y., ACS Appl.
Mater. Interf. 7, 8041–8052 (2015).
[20] Amoli, B. M., Marzbanrad, E., Hu, A., Zhou, Y. N., and Zhao B., Macromol. Mater.
Eng. 299, 739–747 (2014).