RUBRIC FOR CLASS ORAL RECITATION/PARTICIPATION/RECITATION

Criteria Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Needs/Improvement Total Points

(95-100%) (55-80%) (80-55%)
Clarity & Tone of voice Student pronounces Student portrays clear pronunciation and Does not maintains
clearly maintains audience interest, but does not audience interest
consistently use fluid speech.
Delivery, Mastery Student uses body Student uses body language appropriately, Display distracting body
language appropriately somewhat rehearsed his/her thought, seldom language, use filler words
uses filler words (“umm”, “like”, etc.) and
speaks clearly in an understandable pace.
Preparedness Student is knowledgeable Student seems pretty prepared but might Seems not prepared for the
of the topic have needed a couple more rehearsals. recitation

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

1
 RUBRIC FOR CASE STUDY ANALYSIS

Content POINTS
50 Pts. 50 40 20 10
Identification of the main Identifies and understands all of the Identifies and understands Identifies and understands Identifies and understands few
Issues/Problems main issues in the case study most of the main issues in the some of the issues in the of the issues in case study
case study case study
Analysis of the Issues Insightful and thorough analysis of Thorough analysis of most of Superficial analysis of some Incomplete analysis of the
all the issues the issues of the issues in the case issues
Comments on effective Well documented, reasoned and Appropriate, well thought out Superficial and/or Little or no action suggested,
solution/strategies (the pedagogically appropriate comments about solutions, or inappropriate solutions to and/or inappropriate solutions
solution may be in the comments on solutions, or proposal proposals for solutions, to some of the issues in the to all of the issues in the case
case already or proposed for solutions, to all issues in the most of the issues in the case case study study
by you) case study study
Linking course reading to Excellent research into the issues Good research and Limited research Incomplete research and links
research with clearly documented links to documented links to the documented links to any to any readings
class (and/or outside readings) materials read readings
POINTS
WRITING SKILLS 30 20 10 5
30Pts. Writing is totally free of errors. There are occasional errors There are more than Errors are frequent
Report of the episode is very Report could be tightened a occasional errors Report of the episode is
concise little Report could be tightened extremely long-winded.
quite a lot
POINTS
FORMAT 20Pts. 20 10 5 2
Format is appropriate and enhances Format is appropriate and Format is appropriate and Format is appropriate but
the understanding of the critical enhances the understanding of enhances the understanding seldom enhances the
episode in a creative and dramatic the critical episode in of the critical episode some understanding of the critical
manner throughout the case dramatic manner for most the of the time episode
case

2
Course & Year:______________
Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

3
 RUBRIC FOR COMPUTER LABORATORY ACTIVITY
4 6 8 10
Adequate Time Student spent too much time and/or tooStudent spent too much time Student spent an adequate amount of Student spent an adequate amount of
Spent on Activity little time on entire entire computer lab
and/or too little time on parts of time on computer lab activity to ensure time on computer lab activity to
(10Pts.) activity. computer lab activity. good results. ensure the best results.
Effort (10Pts.) Student put little to no effort towards
Student put little effort towards Student put a good amount of effort Student put great deal of effort
computer lab activity. computer lab activity. towards computer lab activity. towards computer lab activity.
Completion of Student completed less than ½ of the Student completed about ½ of the Student completed about 80% of the Student completed all of the computer
Task (10Pts.) computer lab activity by the due date.computer lab activity by the due computer lab activity by the due date. lab activity by the due date.
date.
Neatness, Responses and information given are Responses and information given Responses and information given are Responses and information given are
Readability, and entirely unreadable and illegible are unreadable and illegible neat, readable, and legible throughout, very neat, readable, and legible
Legibility (10Pts.) throughout the activity. throughout most of the activity. most of the activity. throughout all of the activity.

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

4
 RUBRICS IN GROUP REPORT
Component Sophisticated
Teamwork/Level of The team worked well together to achieve
Engagement (25 Points) objectives. Each member contributed in a
valuable way to the project. All data sources
indicated a high level of mutual respect and
collaboration.
Contribution (25 Points) All requirements and objectives are identified,
evaluated and competed. The deliverable offered
new information or approach to the topic under
discussion. Likewise, the application is based on
started criteria, analysis and constraints.
Subject Knowledge (25 The deliverable demonstrated knowledge of the
Points) course content by integrating major and minor
concepts into the response. The deliverable also
demonstrated evidence of extensive research
effort and a depth of thinking about the topic.
Supporting All relevant information was obtained and
Material (20 Points) Information sources were valid. Analysis and
design considerations were well supported by the
information.
Composition (5 Points) The deliverable was well organized and clearly
written. The underlying logic was clearly
articulated and easy to follow. Words were
chosen that precisely expressed the indent
meaning and supported reader comprehension.
Diagrams or analyses enhanced and clarified
Competent
The team worked well together most of
the time, with only a few occurrences of
communication breakdown or failure to
collaborate when appropriate. Members
were mostly respectful of each other.
All requirements are identified and
evaluated but some objectives are not
completed. The deliverable offered some
new information or approach to the topic
under discussion. The application is
reasonable; further analysis of some of
the alternatives constraints may have led
to a different recommendation.
The deliverable demonstrated knowledge
of the course content by integrating
major concepts into the response. The
deliverable also demonstrated evidence
of extensive research effort and/or initial
of thinking about the topic.
Sufficient information was
Obtained and most sources were valid.
Analysis and design considerations were
mostly supported by the information.
The deliverable was organized and
clearly written for the most part. In some
areas the logic and/or flow of ideas were
difficult to follow. Words were well
chosen with some minor expectations.
Diagrams were consistent with the text.
Not Yet Complete
Team did not collaborate or communicate well.
Some members would work independently,
without regard to objectives or priorities. A
lack of respect and regard was frequently
noted.
Many requirements and objectives are not
identified, evaluated and/or completed. The
deliverable offered no new information or
approach to the topic under discussion. Few
application considerations are analyzed and
other factors were ignored or incompletely
analyzed.
The deliverable did not demonstrate
knowledge of the course content, evidence of
the research effort or depth of thinking about
the topic.
Insufficient information
Was obtained and/or sources lack validity.
Analysis and design considerations were not
supported by the information collected.
The deliverable lacked overall organization.
The reader had to make considerable effort to
understand the underlying logic and flow of
ideas. Diagrams were absent or inconsistent
with the text. Grammatical and spelling errors
made it difficult for the reader to interpret the
5
 presentation of ideas. Sentence were Sentences were mostly grammatical text in places.
grammatical and free from errors. and/or only few spelling errors were
present but they did not hinder the reader.

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

6
 RUBRIC FOR ESSAY/WRITTEN EXAMINATION
Criteria Missing or Serious Problems Below Expectations Meets Expectations Excellent Work Points
Earned
0 10 15 20
the relevant of answer The essay did not answer the The answer is incomplete. The answer id brief with The answer is
to the question question Excessive discussion of unrelated insufficient detail. Unrelated issues complete; sufficient
issues and/or significant errors in were introduced and/or minor detail provided to
content. errors in content support assertions;
answer focuses only
on issues related to
the question;
factually correct
Thoroughness of None of the relevant details were Serious gaps in the basic details Most of the basic details are Deals fully with the
answer included needed included but some are missing entire question
Organization of Weak organization; sentences Minor problem of organization or Clear and logical presentation;
answer rambling; ideas are repeated logic; needs work on creating good development of an argument;
transitions between ideas transitions are made clearly and
smoothly
Mechanics of writing Major problems with mechanics of Frequently problems with Clear, readable, prose. Good use of
(spelling, punctuation, language; awkward sentence mechanics of language; occasional transition; no problems with
grammar, clarity of construction; poor or absent of awkward sentence construction; spelling; punctuation, or grammar
pose) transitions; frequently difficult to poor transitions; reduce readability
understand
TOTAL POINTS
EARNED

7
 RUBRIC FOR WRITTEN EXAMINATION
CRITERIA
Content  Content indicates synthesis of ideas, in depth analysis and 40%
originality
Grammar and Mechanics  Free from spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors, absence of 30%
fragments, comma splices, and run-ons.
Format/Style  current format/style including margins, spelling and identification 30%
TOTAL 100%

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

8
 RUBRICS FOR ORAL PARTICIPATION
CRITERIA
Delivery  Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom 40%
looking at notes
 Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience
interest and emphasize key points.
Content  Demonstrates full knowledge of the subject matter questions at fingertips 40%
 Provides clear purpose and subject; supports conclusions/ideas with evidence
Enthusiasm/Audience  Increase audience understanding and knowledge of topic 20%
awareness  Demonstrates strong enthusiasm about the topic
TOTAL 100%

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

9
 RUBIC FOR INDIVIDUAL ORAL EXAMINATION/PRESENTATION/RECITATION
AREAS SCORING CRITERIA SCORE
Organization of Idea  Information is presented in a logical sequence
(40 Points)
Content of Answer  Accurate information presented
(45 Points)  Technical terms are well-defined in proper language.
 Some points are made reflect well their relative importance.
Delivery  Speaker maintains good eye contact
(15 Points)  Speaker uses a clear, audience voice.
 Delivery is poised, controlled and smooth
 Good language skills and pronunciation are used.

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

10
 RUBRICS FOR TECHNICAL/INDUSTRIAL KNOWLEDGE

Performance Indicator Unsatisfactory (1) Satisfactory (2) Exemplary (3) Score

1. Identify the computer input The student could identify computer input and output The student could identify and able to discuss the The student could easily identify and discuss the
and output devices devices but fails to discuss its function property. function of computer input and output devices. function of computer input and output devices.
2. Demonstrate appropriate The student displayed lack of understanding about The students possessed understanding the The student had demonstrated full understanding of
steps in removing detected the appropriate steps in removing detected PC appropriate steps in removing detected PC virus steps in removing detected PC viruses an able to
PC virus viruses. but fails to perform virus detection and removal in perform such.
a PC.
3. Apply workable approaches The student had limited ideas about the workable The students possessed enough knowledge in The student had possessed full knowledge on
and skills in disassembling approaches and skills in disassembling and disassembling and assembling approaches of disassembling and assembling approaches of
and assembling computer assembling computer devices. computer devices bit fails to apply it in actual. computer devices, and able to apply it in actual.
devices.
Total Score
Mean Score = (Total Score/3)
Percentage Rating = (Total Score/9)x100%

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

11
 RUBRICS FOR LABORATORY REPORT
CATEGORY 4 (Excellent) 3 (Very Good) 2 (Good) 1 (Needs Improvement)
Science Report illustrate accurate and thorough Report illustrate accurate
Report illustrate limited Report illustrate inaccurate
Concepts understanding of scientific concepts understanding of most scientific understanding of scientific concepts understanding of scientific
underlying the lab. concepts underlying the lab. underlying the lab. concepts underlying the lab.
Experimental Hypothesized relationship between the Hypothesized relationship between the
Hypothesized relationship between No hypothesis has been
Hypothesis variables and the predicted results clear variables and the predicted results
the variables and the predicted stated.
and reasonable based on what have been reasonable based on general
results have been stated, but
studied. knowledge and observation. appeared to be based on flawed
logic.
Procedures Procedures are listed in clear steps. Each Procedures are listed in a logical Procedures are listed but are not in Procedures do not accurately
step is numbered and stated complete order, but steps are not numbered a logical order or are difficult to list the steps of the
sentence. and/or are not stated in complete follow. experiment.
sentences.
Data Data are excellently accurately presented Accurate representation of the data in Accurate representation of the data Data are not shown OR are
in graph and tables. tables and/or graphs. Graphs and in written form, but no graph or inaccurate.
tables tables are presented.
Conclusion Conclusions findings supported the Conclusions findings supported the Conclusion party what was learned No conclusion was include in
hypothesis. hypothesis and what was learned from from the experiment. the report OR shows little
the experiment. effort and reflection.
Component of All required element are [present and All required elements are present. One required element is missing, Several required elements
the report additional element that add to the report but additional elements that add to are missing.
(e.g., thoughtful comments, graphics) the report (e.g., thoughtful
have been added. comment, graphics) have been
added.

12
Course & Year:______________
Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

13
 RUBRIC FOR PORTFOLIO PRESENTATION

CRITERIA PERCEN`TAGE SCORE

Organization
(clarity of concepts, 20%
relevance of evidence)
Content
(relevance, 50%
comprehensiveness, entirely)
Oral Presentation
(Delivery use of Media, 40%
Ability to answer question)

Total 100%

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.
14
 RUBRIC FOR PORTFOLIO ASSESMENT

Quality of Entire Presentation Degree of Self – Reflection Improvement/Progress Made Depth of Undertaking (2) Responsiveness/Feedback (1)
(5) (4) (3)
(Relevance, artistry, (Insights gained) (Relevant of Evidences) (Clarity of concepts) (others remarks/comments)
comprehensiveness) 20% 20% 20% 10%
20%

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

15
 RUBRIC FOR PLATE ASSESMENT

CRITERIA PERFORMANCE LEVELS

100
(Total Points) OUTSTANDING VERY SATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
The plate submitted has all theThe plate submitted has all the The plate submitted has all the The plate submitted has all the
CONTENT/SUBSTANCE concepts, complete, expressed content, completed, but content, completed, but content, completed, but
(50 POINTS) in comprehensive and expressed in slightly expressed in loosely expressed in incomprehensive
coherent manner. comprehensive and content comprehensive and incoherent and incoherent manner.
manner. manner.
(50 points) (35 points) (20 points) (5 points)
ACCURACY Has followed all the required Has followed most of the Has followed least of the Did not follow the required
(20 points) specification/format/details. required required specification/format/details.
specification/format/details. specification/format/details.
(20 points) (15 points) (10 points) (5 points)
ORIGINALLY Has shown originality in Has little originality. Has no originality. Has copied the works of
(10 points) work. others.
(7 points) (5 points) (2 points)
(10 points)
PROMPTNES Has submitted before Has submitted on the day of Submitted after the deadline. Submitted 2 weeks after the
(10 points) deadline. the deadline. deadline or has not submitted
at all.
(7 points) (5 points) (2 points)
(10 points)
NEATNESS Very good/Very Good/Appealing/Neat Average presentation of work. Weak presentation of work.
(10 points) appealing/Very neat presentation of work.

16
 presentation of work.
(10 points) (7 points) (5 points) (2 points)

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

17
 RUBRIC FOR PRACTICAL ACTIVITY/LABORATORY EXERCISE
CRITERIA PERCENTAGE SCORE
Performance during the conduct of activity 40%
Ability in answer the given question 30%
Quality and Originality of work 20%
Timelines 10%
TOTAL

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

18
 RUBRIC FOR MEAT PRODUCT/PROCESSING
CRITERIA PERCENTAGE SCORE
Techniques and abilities to perform the activity 40%
Quality of Output 40%
Presentation 20%
Total

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

19
 RUBRIC FOR PRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT OF BROILER PROJECT
(Broiler production)

CRITERIA PERCENTAGE SCORE

Able to manifest industry towards work 40%
Quality of paper works or output submitted 30%
Presentation 30%
Total

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

20

Component
Teamwork (25 points)
Contribution (25 points)
Knowledge of the Subject (25 points) The
Supporting Materials (25 points)
RUBRIC FOR ROLE PLAYING
Sophisticated
The team worked well together to
achieve objectives. Each member
contributed in a valuable way to the
project. All data source indicated a
high level of mutual respect and
collaboration.
All requirements and objectives are
identified, evaluated and completed.
The deliverables offered new
information or approach to the topic
under discussion. Likewise, the
application is based on stated criteria,
analysis and constraints.
deliberations demonstrated
knowledge of the course content by
integrating major and minor concepts
into the response. The Deliverable
also demonstrated evidence of
extensive research effort and a depth
of thinking about the topic.
All relevant information are obtained
and information sources were valid.
Component
The team worked well together most
of the time, with only a few
occurrences of communication
breakdown or failure to collaborate
when appropriate. Members were
mostly respectful of each other.
All requirements are identified and
evaluated but some objectives are not
completed. The develirables offered
some new information or approach to
the topic under discussion. The
application is reasonable; further
analysis of some of the alternatives or
constrains may have led to a different
recommendation.
The deliverable demonstrated
knowledge of the course content by
integrating major concepts into the
response. The deliverable also
demonstrated evidence of limited
research effort and/or initial of
thinking about the topic.
Sufficient information was obtained
and most source were valid. Analysis
Not Yet Component
Team did not collaborate or
communicate well. Some members
would work independently, without
regards to objectives or priorities. A
lack of respect and regard was
frequently noted.
Many requirements and objectives are
not identified, evaluated and/or
completed. The deliverables offered
no new information or approach to the
topic under discussion. Few
application considerations are
analyzed and other factors were
ignored or incompletely analyzed.
The deliverable did not demonstrated
knowledge of the course content,
evidence of the research effort or
depth of thinking about the topic.
Insufficient information was obtained
and/or sources lack validity. Analysis
21

Composition (5 points)
Analysis and design considerations
were well supported by the
information.
The deliverables were well
organization and clearly written. The
underlying logic was clearly
articulated and easy to follow. Words
were chosen that precisely expressed
the intended meaning and supported
reader comprehensive. Diagrams or
analyses enhanced and clarified
presentation of ideas. Sentences were
grammatical and free from errors.
and design considerations were mostly and design considerations were not
supported by the information. supported by the information
collected.
The deliverables were organized and The deliverables lacked overall
clearly written for the most part. In organization. The reader had to make
some areas the logic and/or flow of considerable effort to understand the
ideas were difficult to follow. Words underlying logic and flow of ideas.
were well chosen with some minor Diagrams were absents or inconsistent
expectations. Diagrams were with the next. Grammatical and
consistent with the text. Sentences spelling errors made it difficult for the
were mostly grammatical and/or only reader to interpret the text in places.
a few spelling errors were present but
they did not hinder the reader.

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

22
 RUBRIC FOR REPORT PRESENTATION
CRITERIA SCORING CRITERIA SCORE TOTAL
The type of presentation is appropriate for the topic and audience. 5
Organization (15 points) Information is presented in a logic sequence. 5
Presentation appropriately cites requisite number of references. 5
Introduction is attention-getting, lays out the problem well, and establishes a framework for the rest of the 5
presentation.
Technical terms are well-defined in language appropriate for the target audience. 5
Presentation contains accurate information. 10
Content (45 points)
Materials included is relevant to the overall message/purpose. 10
Appropriate amount of materials is prepared, and points made reflect well their relative importance. 10
There is an obvious conclusion summarizing the presentation. 5
Speaker maintains good eye contact with the audience and is appropriately animated (e.g., gestures, 5
moving around, etc.).
Speaker uses a clear, audible voice. 5
Presentation (40 points) Delivery is poised, controlled, and smooth. 5
Good language skills and pronunciation are used. 5
Audio visual aids, graphs and figure are well prepared, information, effective, and not distracting. 5
Length of presentation is within the assigned time limits. 5
Information was well communicated. 10
Score Total Points 100

______________________________

23
 Course Facilitator

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ___________________________________
8. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
9.
10.

24
 RUBRIC FOR TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE

PERFORMANCE UNSATISFACTORY SATESFACTORY EXEMPLARY SCORE

INDICATORS
Choose the appropriate
ingredients material and
equipment and following
standard procedure in applying
the skill in cookery and baking.
Produce good quality of the
finished baked product.
Applying appropriate standard
in sanitation and hygiene in
baking and cooking.
Applying standard safety in
baking and cooking
Course & Year:______________
Subject:_______________
1 2 3
The students do not know any ingredients The student can identify but fails to apply The student correctly applies the
material and all equipment and not it appropriately and some standard appropriate skill in identifying, applying
following the standard procedure in procedure was not being followed. the material and equipment and following
applying the skill in cooking and looking. the standard procedure in cooking and
baking.
The student failed to procedure good The student-produced quite better quality The students-produced a good quality
quality baked product. of the baked product. standard of baked products.
The student does not applying sanitary The student sometimes forgets to apply The student is constantly following the
and proper hygiene in cooking and proper hygiene in baking and cooking proper standard of proper hygiene and
baking in all duration of the performance. once in a while. sanitation in baking and cooking.
The student does not know the standard The student sometimes forgets to apply The student is constantly aware of
procedure for baking and cooking. safety procedure in baking and cooking. applying safety procedure in baking and
cooking.

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
25
7.
8.
9.
10.
 ___________________________________
NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY

RUBRIC FOR TERM PAPER

Criteria Apprentice Basic Learned Exemplary Score

Clarity and Demonstrates minimal Demonstrates an attempt to answer Demonstrates an adequate focus Original though or approach. Demonstrates
Intention attention to the assigned assigned task, but is vague and is on assigned task. Arguments id a clear intention that is responsive to the
task. Paper makes no made of statements rather than fairly obvious, clear, and concise. assigned task. Contextualizes the topic or
argument and has no arguments. 7 8 text to be analyzed.
direction. 4 5 6 9 10
1 2 3
Content demonstrates Content demonstrates attention to Content demonstrates Content explores complex ideas that are
consideration of simple ideas simple ideas that are evident in the consideration of new ideas that used to shape compelling work. Provides
Content that are evident in some work. Student did not master the are used to shape solid work. ample evidence to support arguments.
Development elements of the paper. material due to shallow Provides some, but not enough, Employs logical and smooth writing.
Thoughts are unclear and researching and careless reading. evidence to support main point.
unconnected. Difficult to follow, full of Somewhat logical, but at times
1 2 3 digressions. wanders. 9 10
4 5 6 7 8
There is no opening Paper does not provide context. Contextualized the topic and text Careful statement of thesis. Strong topic
paragraph or thesis. Paragraphs do not have topic to be analyzed. Uneven in sentences and paragraph connections.
Structure Paragraphs and sentences are sentences and are randomly paragraph construction and Compelling conclusion originally
and disjointed. No conclusion. organized. Conclusion is weak and connections. Conclusion does not following from the earlier ideas expanded
Organization hastily added at the end of the support thesis very well. in the paper.
paper.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10

26
 Attempts to use some source Uses less than five scholarly Competently uses at least five Skillfully uses at least five scholarly
Research and evidence to support sources that all agree with each relevant scholarly source and relevant sources as evidence to support
and Use of ideas, but mostly relies on other. Sources something are not cites sources as evidence to well developed ideas.
Source personal assumptions. relevant. Often relies on personal support well-developed ideas.
assumptions not based on
1 2 3 evidence. 7 8 9 10
4 5 6
Length off paper is Use of slang, colloquial Some spelling and grammatical Careful editing. Proper margins, spacing,
Language significantly shorter than expressions or other informal errors. Respects required length footnoting, quotations, pagination and
and required in the assignment. speech. Many spelling and specified in assignment. biographical citations. Flawless spelling,
Formatting Language is informal, not grammatical. Length of paper is up grammar, typography, and punctuation.
respecting the standards of to two pages over or less than Respects required length specified in
an academic paper. specified in assignment. assignment.
Numerous spelling,
grammatical, and
typographical errors. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 2 3

Course & Year:______________

Subject:_______________

Name of Students Score

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ___________________________________
7. NAME/SIGNATURE OF THE FACULTY
8.
9.
10.
27
28