Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Green Finance and Economic Development of A Country
Green Finance and Economic Development of A Country
This is to certify that I have completed the Project titled” GREEN FINANCE
PALLAV TYAGI
01016659421
Certificate
TO WHOMSOEVER IT MAY CONCERN
unending support.
project guide and to all those who have indirectly guided and
● Zadek and Flynn (2013): "Green finance is often used interchangeably with green
investment. However, in practice, green finance is a wider lens including more than
investments as defined by Bloomberg New Energy Finance and others. Most
important is that it includes operational costs of green investments not included under
the definition of green investment. Most obviously, it would include costs such as
project preparation and land acquisition costs, both of which are not just significant
but can pose distinct financing challenges."
● Pricewaterhouse Coopers Consultants (PWC) (2013): "For the banking sector, green
finance is defined as financial products and services, under the consideration of
environmental factors throughout the lending decision making, ex-post monitoring
and risk management processes, provided to promote environmentally responsible
investments and stimulate low-carbon technologies, projects, industries and
businesses."1
GREEN FINANCE
1 (Dr. Nannette Lindenberg, 2014), Definition of Green Finance, German Development Institute.
Green finance or sustainable finance is the set of financial regulations,
standards, norms and products that pursue an environmental objective, and in
particular to facilitate the energy transition. It allows the financial system to
connect with the economy and its populations by financing its agents while
maintaining a growth objective.2
Green finance refers to the financial arrangements that are specific to the use for
projects that are environmentally sustainable or projects that adopt the aspects
of climate change. Environmentally sustainable projects include the production
of energy from renewable sources like solar, wind, biogas, etc.; clean
transportation that involves lower greenhouse gas emission; energy efficient
projects like green building; waste management that includes recycling, efficient
disposal and conversion to energy, etc. Moreover, project defined sustainable
under the disclosure requirement for Green Debt Securities include climate
change adaptation, sustainable waste and water managements, sustainable land
use including sustainable forestry and agriculture, and biodiversity conservation
(SEBI 2017). In order to meet the financial needs for these types of projects,
new financial instruments such as green bonds; carbon market instruments (e.g.
carbon tax); and new financial institutions (e.g. green banks and green funds)
are being established. They together constitute green finance.
Green finance is central to the overall discussion on sustainability of economic
growth. Rapid economic development is often achieved at the cost of
environment. Dwindling natural resources, degraded environment and rampant
pollution are hazardous to public health and pose challenges to the sustainable
economic growth. In order to protect and substantially improve the
environment, nations around the world have been increasingly focusing on the
use of eco- friendly technologies. However, it requires appropriate incentive
structure for increased allocation of funds towards setting up or adopting
environmentally sustainable projects. Once funds are freed from the
conventional industries and are channelled into the green and environment-
friendly sectors, other resources including land and labour may also follow. This
eventually leads to an optimal allocation of resources that support sustainable
growth in the long run. In order to achieve these objectives, targeted policies on
green finance have been formed in major countries involving all stakeholders of
economic growth, viz., corporates, governments and central banks.3
Dating back to the first decade of the 21st century, green bonds are
sometimes referred to as climate bonds, but the two terms are not
always synonymous.
Economic growth should be a positive force for the whole planet.This is why
we must make sure that financial progress creates decent and fulfilling jobs
while not harming the environment. We must protect labour rights and once
and for all put a stop to modern slavery and child labour. If we promote job
creation with expanded access to banking and financial services, we can
make sure that everybody gets the benefits of entrepreneurship and
innovation.
COVID-19 has deepened existing inequalities, hitting the poorest and most
vulnerable communities the hardest. It has put a spotlight on economic
inequalities and fragile social safety nets that leave vulnerable communities to
bear the brunt of the crisis. At the same time, social, political and economic
inequalities have amplified the impacts of the pandemic.
Each year, an estimated one third of all food produced – equivalent to 1.3
billion tonnes worth around $1 trillion – ends up rotting in the bins of
consumers and retailers, or spoiling due to poor transportation and harvesting
practices. If people worldwide switched to energy efficient light bulbs the world
would save US$120 billion annually.
Should the global population reach 9.6 billion by 2050, the equivalent of
almost three planets could be required to provide the natural resources
needed to sustain current lifestyles. The COVID-19 pandemic offers countries
an opportunity to build recovery plans that will reverse current trends and
change our consumption and production patterns towards a more sustainable
future.
Green financing here in consumption and production implies doing more and
better with less. It is all about separating financial growth from environmental
degradation, which will help in increase of resource efficiency and promoting
sustainable lifestyles. It can also help in poverty alleviation and the movement
towards green and low carbon economies.
13. Climate Action : Climate transition has broad line up in financial and
economic implications.Hence, financial authorities and central banks
throughout the world are playing an active role in promoting the change
towards a sustainable economy.
14. Life Below Water : It states conservation and sustainable use of seas,
oceans and marine for sustainable progress. Clean seas and oceans are
important to our survival.They cover 70% of the whole planet and we subsist
on them for energy, water and food. Yet, we have managed to do enormous
degradation to these resources. We must protect them by eliminating pollution
and overfishing and immediately start to responsibly manage and protect all
marine life around the world.
15. Life on Land : This objective aims at protecting, restoring and promoting
efficient and sustainable usage of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage
plantations and forests, fight drylands and deforestation, and stop and reverse
land deterioration and terminate wildlife-conservation and ecosystem loss.
This study, jointly produced by Climate Policy Initiative and Vivid Economics
maps the ‘greenness’ of these fiscal stimulus measures and their contribution
towards country-level climate objectives. As compared to unexceptional
stimulus action, green stimulus actions have been proven to provide both
short-term profitable gains and develop national wealth in the long-term.
Green recovery actions, such as funding in net zero emission, sustainable
energy, energy planning, conveyance and nature-based alleviation and
adjustment solutions provide higher employment strength, in addition to other
financial rebates and larger social advantages, than policies that seek to prop
up aging, more polluting means of production.
The India Advisory Council of the UNEP India Inquiry was assembled by the
Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI). This
analysis, emphasises important proposals resulting from their discussions for
syncing the Indian financial system with sustainability.
In the Indian context, they focus at the call development of stronger and
reliable ‘efficiency aligned market framework’ focused on institutional
investment, banking, foreign direct investment, and public finance institutions.
They called for rules and regulatory reorganisation in following areas:
● Rajkot, India
● Jakarta, Indonesia
● Amman, Jordan
● Mexico City, Mexico
● Nairobi, Kenya
● Belgrade, Serbia
60% of the area expected to be urban throughout the world by 2050 remains
to be built. Instead of diverting inadequate resources to net-zero-carbon,
robust, sustainable, and climate-friendly investments, these cities can go
through historical strategies and plans to to urbanization.