Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Program Evaluation Analysis Computation Output
Program Evaluation Analysis Computation Output
Trainee 1 Trainee 2
B. Course Content
1. Course content vis-à-vis the program objectives 4 3
2. Sequencing of the course contents 4 3
3. Sufficiency of information 4 3
4. Relevance of course content vis-à-vis need 4 3
C. Training Methodology
1. Effectiveness of selected method 4 3
2. Appropriateness to the course activities 4 3
Facilitator/Trainer (AndresCabalu)
1. Knowledge of the subject matter 5 4
2. Ability to communicate ideas 5 4
3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4
4. Ability to encourage participation 5 4
5. Ability to organise lecture 5 4
6. Ability to answer questions 4 4
7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4
8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 5 4
9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 5 4
10. Use of training equipment 4 4
11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4
12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 5 4
13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4
Facilitator/Trainer (Dominador Dizon)
1. Knowledge of the subject matter 5 4
2. Ability to communicate ideas 5 4
3. Ability to arouse interest 4 4
4. Ability to encourage participation 5 4
5. Ability to organise lecture 5 4
6. Ability to answer questions 4 4
7. Openness to suggestions and comments 4 4
8. Ability to encourage critical and/or creative thinking 5 4
9. Spontaneity in expression of ideas 5 4
10. Use of training equipment 4 4
11. Comprehensiveness of lecture 4 4
12. Ability to provide adequate feedback 5 4
13. Ability to provide practical exercises 4 4
JOSELITO S. TOLVO
Voc'l. Sch. Administrator
Lasam Institute of Technology
Average
Trainee 3 Average Descriptive Rating
per Group
4.42
5 4.67 Outstanding
In this area, the item on "Scheduling of activities
5 4.33 Very Good / Very Satisfactory time allotment" got a rating of 3.0 or "Very Good/
5 4.33 Very Good / Very Satisfactory Satisfactory" while the rest were rated "Good /
Adequate".
5 4.33 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4.42 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3.67
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory All items under the Course Content got ratings fa
on "Very Good/Very Satisfactory". This means th
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory trainees were very satisfied with the course conte
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory
3.67
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory On the "effectiveness of selected method", a 3.9 rating was gi
"Very Good/Very satisfactory" while the "Appropriateness to
4 3.67 Very Good / Very Satisfactory course activities" got 3.80 or "Very Good/Very Satisfactory".
Outstanding
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Redilyn
The whole items got and average rating of 4.34 C. Agub)" got an average
which is equivalent to "Very Good" rating of 4.34 or "Very Good"".
Outstanding
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F.
All Items got a rating of 4.31 or "Very Good" Cabalu)" got an average rating
of 4.31 or "Very Good".
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F.
All Items got a rating of 4.31 or "Very Good" Cabalu)" got an average rating
of 4.31 or "Very Good".
Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Andres F.
All Items got a rating of 4.31 or "Very Good" Cabalu)" got an average rating
of 4.31 or "Very Good".
Very Good
The item on
"Facilitator/Trainer (Gervacio
All the items got and average rating of 4.31 or Faustino)" got an average
"Very Good" respectively. rating of 4.31 or "Very Good".