Professional Documents
Culture Documents
21 VSE Piliavin Practice Assessment Questions
21 VSE Piliavin Practice Assessment Questions
1. According to Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin diffusion of responsibility has been demonstrated in
laboratory studies on helping behaviour.
a) What is meant by the term diffusion of responsibility? [2]
When the responsibility is divided among the people around us so we fill less responsible for a
course of action, usually ignore to help someone
2. The study by Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin (subway Samaritans) took social psychology out of the
laboratory and into the field.
a) Suggest one reason why diffusion of responsibility was found in laboratory studies but not in the
Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin field study. [2]
b) Suggest one problem with conducting social psychological research in the laboratory. [2]
It’s lower the ecological validity of the study, as peopel are aware of their participant in the
experiment which might lower the validity of the experiment which make the result less
generalisable
7. Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin tested the ‘diffusion of responsibility’ hypothesis in their subway
Samaritans study.
a) To what extent did the findings of the study support the ‘diffusion of responsibility’ hypothesis? [2]
It did not support the hypothesis, the majority of people help in which suggest that their was not much
diffusion of responsibility going on in the scene
b) Suggest one explanation for the findings of the study. [2]
Maybe the space between passengers create a moral pressure in which it make you feel guilty and
evenrually decide to help out. Or maybe others might join in to help you if you decide to help which
mean that the cost of helping is spread out which make us want to help more
8. (a) According to the model of response to emergencies proposed by Piliavin, Rodin and Piliavin,
what are the two factors that influence a person’s decision to help or not? [2]
The cost and reward in which they received when they decide to help
(b) Give an example of the results from the study and explain it in terms of the two factors . [2]
We can see in the study 90% of helpers were male, this is maybe because as a woman the cost of
helping is higher than the reward of helping. Maybe they’re strength is not optimum for helping the victim
and this might make the situation even more embaressing which made them not wanting to help