TOBIAS, NINA SHYLA G.

ACTIVITY 2B: ASSIGNMENT METHOD

1.

OFFICER BLDG. CTU HALL BLGD. ADMIN BLDG. AUDITORIUM

1 350 400 370
2 500 460 380
3 480 450 400

OFFICER BLDG. BLGD. BLDG. OFFICER BLDG. BLGD. BLDG.

CTU ADMIN AUDITORIUM CTU ADMIN AUDITORIUM
HALL HALL
1 0 50 20 1 0 0 20

2 120 80 0 2 120 30 0

3 80 50 0 3 80 0 0

From the optimum table, we can draw conclusion:

DECISION:

BUILDING COST

OFFICER 1 CTU HALL P350

OFFICER 2 AUDITORIUM P380
OFFICER 3 ADMIN P450
P1,180.00 – the minimum cost

2.

JOBS MACHINE A MACHINE B MACHINE C MACHINE D

1 400 600 800 1,000
2 200 600 400 800
3 800 700 400 400
4 900 1,000 400 600
JOB MACHINE MACHINE MACHINE MACHINE JOB MACHINE MACHINE MACHINE MACHINE
S A B C D S A B C D
1 0 200 400 600 1 0 0 400 600

2 0 400 200 600 2 0 200 200 600

MACHINE COST
3 400 300 0 0 3 400 100 0 0
JOB 1 MACHINE B P600
4 500 600 0 200 4 500 400 0 200
JOB 2 MACHINE A P200
JOBoptimum
From the 3 MACHINE
table, we can D
draw conclusion: P400
DECISION:
JOB 4 MACHINE C P400
P1,600.00 – the minimum cost

3.

TEAM PLAYER 1 PLAYER 2 PLAYER 3 PLAYER 4

RB P170,000 P175,000 P195,000 P185,000
RF 185,000 180,000 175,000 195,000
FdX 175,000 185,000 180,000 170,000
TnT 180,000 175,000 185,000 170,000

TEAM PLAYER 1 PLAYER 2 PLAYER 3 PLAYER 4

TEAM RB
PLAYER PLAYER 0
PLAYER PLAYER5,000 25,000 15,000
1 RF2 10,000
3 4 5,000 0 25,000
FdX 5,000 15,000 5,000 0
RB 0 0
TnT 25,000
10,000 15,0005,000 15,000 0

RF 10,000 0 0 25,000

FdX 5,000 10,000 5,000 0

TnT 10,000 0 15,000 0

From the optimum table, we can draw conclusion:
DECISION:

TEAM PLAYER COST

RB PLAYER 1
170,000
RF PLAYER 3 175,000
FdX PLAYER 4 170,000
TnT PLAYER 2 175,000
MINIMUM COST P690, 000