Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Epitope Prediction Based On Carbon Content
Epitope Prediction Based On Carbon Content
ABSTRACT
Epitope are portion of protein antigen that helps virus-antibody interactions for entry of foreign body into B-cell. Epitope
prediction based on carbon content is reported here. The study is carried out on glycoprotein of rapies virus. The carbon
based analysis program (CARBANA) predicts the epitope region clearly. The predicted results are in agreement with
reported sites. The study suggests that the epitope are hydrophobic in nature. The carbon based analysis can be an alternative
method for predicting epitope and will aid in redesign of epitope regions.
Keywords: Glycoprotein; antigenic determinant; epitope prediction; carbon content; hydrophobicity;
Similarly amino acids from 330 to 338 are involved to be It is also reported that the amino acids 333, 340,
in the antigenic site III of glycoprotein of rapies virus. 342-343 and 357 are involved in antigenic sites which
This site again involved in hydrophobic region in the are again in carbon rich region. One can conclude that a
carbon distribution plot. Both these sites in carbon stretch of amino acids involved in epitope rather one or
distribution plot reveal that hydrophobic interaction is two amino acid. Further modification or mutations can
the dominant force that involved in antigen-antibody be suggested based on the carbon distribution plot. Many
interactions. times the mutations that alter the interactions are due to
changes in the domain structure.
The epitope predicted using AAP of BCPREDS
(B-cell epitope prediction server) is given in Table 1. The
program was instructed to predict epitope of length
22 amino acid as shown in the output. The start of each
epitope, the sequence and score values are listed in the
table. In another output the complete glycoprotein
sequence with predicted epitope are given. This program
predicts that a length of 22 amino acid starting from 83,
114, 160, 210, 274, 324, 419 and 488 are epitope. Majority
Figure 1: Plot of Carbon Percentage vs Amino Acid in of these sites are in hydrophobic regions and in agreement
Glycoprotein. The Points Above the Threshold Line (31.45%) with carbon distribution plot except at 210 and 488.
are Considered as Epitope Regions.
Table 1
BCPREDS Output: Epitope Predicted using AAP.
Position Epitope Score
419 ADPSTVFKEGDEAEDFVEVHLP 1
488 SKQRSFGGTGGNVSVTSQSGKV 1
274 DQLVNLHDFRSNEIEHLVVEDL 1
324 RKLVPGFGKAYTIFNKTLMEAD 1
160 DLDPYDKSLHSRVFPGGKCSGI 1
114 RAAYNWKMAGDPRYEESLQNPY 1
210 IFTNSRGKRASNGNKTCGFVDE 1
83 VVTEAETYTNFVGYVTTTFKRK 0.616
Another output of BCPREDS (the E labeled amino acids involved to have epitope site).
1 11 21 31 41 51 60
| | | | | | |
MVPQVLLFVLLLGFSLCFGKFPIYTIPDKLGPWSPIDIHHLRCPNNLVVEDEGCTNLSGF 60
...........................................................................................................................................................
SYMELKVGYISAIKVNGFTCTGVVTEAETYTNFVGYVTTTFKRKHFRPTPDACRAAYNWK 120
.........................................................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE............................EEEEEEE
MAGDPRYEESLQNPYPDYHWLRTVRTTKESLIIISPSVTDLDPYDKSLHSRVFPGGKCSG 180
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE....................................................................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
ITVSSTYCSTNHDYTIWMPEDPRPGTPCDIFTNSRGKRASNGNKTCGFVDERGLYKSLKG 240
E..........................................................................................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.........
ACRLKLCGVLGLRLMDGTWVAMQTSDETKWCSPDQLVNLHDFRSNEIEHLVVEDLVKKRE 300
................................................................................................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE.....
ECLDTLESIMTTKSVSFRRLSHLRKLVPGFGKAYTIFNKTLMEADVHYKSVRTWNEIIPS 360
.........................................................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE............................................
KGCLKVGGRCHPHVNGVFFNGIILGPDDRVLIPEMQSSLLRQHMELLESSVIPLMHPLAD 420
.....................................................................................................................................................EE
PSTVFKEGDEAEDFVEVHLPDVYKKISGVDLGLPNWGKYVLMTAGAMIGLVLIFSLMTWC 480
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE..........................................................................................................
RRANRPESKQRSFGGTGGNVSVTSQSGKVIPSWESYKSGGEIRL 524
.........................EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE...................................
Overall the carbon distribution plot obtained from [4] A.S. Kolaskar and Prasad C. Tongaonkar 1990., “A Semi-
CARBANA program is quite good in predicting epitope. Empirical Method for Prediction of Antigenic
This might help in vaccine design. Determinants on Protein Antigens, FEBS Lett, 276;
pp. 172-174.
4. CONCLUSION [5] K.L. Mansfield, N. Johnson and A.R. Fooks 2004.,
“Identification of a Conserved Linear Epitope at the
Epitope prediction based on carbon content is reported N Terminus of the Rabies Virus Glycoprotein”, J. Gen.
here. This carbon distribution based method is an Vir., 85; pp. 3279–3283.
accurate method for epitope prediction. This new
[6] C. Prehaud, P. Coulon, F. Lafay, C. Thiers and A. Flamand
method and tool developed is hoped to help redesign
1988., “Antigenic Site II of the Rabies Virus Glycoprotein:
epitope regions in antigen. These studies also conclude Structure and Role in Viral Virulence”, J. Vir. pp. 1-7
that the epitopes are hydrophobic in nature.
[7] E.Rajasekaran and M.Vijayasarathy 2011., “CARBANA:
Carbon Analysis Program for Protein Sequences”, Bioinf.
REFERENCES
5(10), pp. 455-457.
[1] A. Benmansour, H. Leblois, P. Coulon, C. Tuffereau, Y.
[8] E.Rajasekaran, C.S.Vinobha, M.Vijayasarathy and
Gaudin, A. Flamand, and F. Lafay, 1991., “Antigenicity
R.Senthil and P.Shankarganesh 2009., “The Nature of
of Rabies Virus Glycoprotein”, J. Vir. 65; pp. 4198-4203.
Proteins”, IACSIT-SC, IEEE, pp. 452-453.
[2] J. Chen, H.Liu, J. Yang, K. Chou 2007., “Prediction of
Linear B-cell Epitopes using Amino Acid Pair [9] S. Saha and G.P.S. Raghava 2004., “BcePred: Prediction
Antigenicity Scale, Amino Acids, 33; pp. 423-428. of Continuous B-Cell Epitopes in Antigenic Sequences
Using Physico-Chemical Properties”, In G.Nicosia,
[3] T.P.Hopp and K.R.Woods 1981., “Prediction of Protein V.Cutello, P.J. Bentley and J.Timis (Eds.) ICARIS 2004,
Antigenic Determinants from Amino Acid Sequences,
LNCS, 3239, pp. 197-204, Springer.
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 86; pp. 152-156