Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Adversity Quotient
Adversity Quotient
Adversity Quotient
1. The behaviors were caused by an internal authority, the students' desire for dominance was
manifested through their enthusiasm, self-confidence, self-esteem, and ambition. The
behaviors would occur in response to another person's reaction, such as persuasion or force,
and they could have a direct impact on both responsibility and future expectations.
Koonthaisong, M. 2003. Some mental features that correlated to the Adversity Quotient.
M.Ed. Thesis. Mahasarakham: Mahasarakham University, Thailand,
2. Even in the face of chaos, it entails remaining stable and maintaining healthy levels of
physical and psychological functions. It can also be viewed as a successful adaptation to
high risk. This has been conceptualized as the result of both individual characteristics and
environmental effects (Markman, 2000; Peak Learning, 2010). Other researchers have
recently demonstrated through the results of their studies that measuring AQ® may be a
better predictor of success than IQ, not only for academic achievement in education, but also
for other related social skills (Zhou, 2009; Williams, 2008; Tantor, 2007).
Markman, G. 2000. Adversity Quotient: The role of personal bounce-back ability in new
venture formation, Human Resousce Management Review, Vol.13(2),2003, pp. 281-301,
Available at: Elsevier.com.
Zhou, H. 2009. The adversity quotient and academic performance among college students
at St. Joseph’s College, Quezon City, Ph.D Universiti Kebangsaan, Malaysia, Available
at : 105 www.peaklearning.com
3. Stoltz (1997) and Pargudtong (2008) considered that individuals can succeed in AQ
development techniques by changing their habits of thinking, which can be created by
uninstalling original visions and intentionally creating a new form of thinking. Furthermore,
studies have shown that AQ development is related to academic achievement development
and promotes emotional stability, adaptation, and stress reduction. Furthermore, it was
discovered that problem-solving ability is not only correlated and positively influences
learning achievement, but it is also positively correlated with work success, social skills, and
self-control (Chailangka, Panomrit, Boonmee, Kaewjaiboon, & Mekloi, 2009; Cornista &
Macasaet, 2013; Saetang, 2012; Santos, 2012).
It is consistent with the findings of the researchers from the data collection survey conducted
in the school. It was discovered that Mutthayomsuksa 3 students had high stress levels as a
result of the aforementioned reasons. As a result, solutions to such problems are required.
Recent studies had primarily studied and developed AQ in adults, so the AQ development
program was not appropriate for samples of early adolescences as it should have been.
Furthermore, no direct research on AQ development programs for stress reduction was
conducted.
There were only studies that looked at the correlation between two variables. As a result, the
researchers believed that the AQ development program, which was directly developed to
solve the problems and be appropriate to the samples, would be one of the solutions to the
previously mentioned stress problems. As a result, the researchers were required to take the
potential of AQ to be adopted for maximum benefit as well as to reduce stress on learning
and living, as well as to be a way to raise a level of success in all life aspects in the future.
Not only adults, but also children and teenagers, face numerous challenges in their personal
and academic lives. School is a major source of stress and creates a variety of adversities.
Students in school must deal with a stressful environment (Hema and Gupta, 2015). They
must deal with competitions, too many assignments, failures and poor relationships with
other students or lecturers, high pressure to get good grades and perform well in exams, peer
pressure or exclusion, negative remarks from teachers and parents, and other aspects of their
school education. According to Sarita and Sonia (2015), concept-laden curriculum,
inappropriate school timings, a high student-teacher ratio, and a nonconductive physical
environment in classrooms
Stress in the family, such as divorce, intrapersonal conflicts, and maternal depression, causes
stress in adolescents, which impairs functioning (Rex Forehand et al, 1991). Examination-
related stresses were discovered to be a major source of adversity in the form of academic
stress (Shirom, 1986). For students, they have become unavoidable adversities. If students
are unable to cope with these conditions, they may experience a variety of psychological
disturbances that have a direct impact on their physical and mental health, causing them
harm. If the degree of disturbance is too great to be tolerated, such students frequently
commit suicide. Students of all ages face a variety of adverse situations. The Adversity
Quotient has been found to be positively related to school performance and climate.
Hema G.,M. Gupta (2015).Adversity Quotient for Prospective Higher Education. The
International Journal of Indian Psychology ISSN 2348-5396 (e) | ISSN: 2349-3429 (p)
Volume 2, Issue 3. Pp50-64
Sarita and Sonia, (2015). Academic Stress among Students: Role and Responsibilities of
Parents. International Journal of Applied Research 2015; 1(10): 385-388
5. Adversity refers to being exposed to unfavorable or calamitous circumstances such as a
cyclone or an earthquake, as well as difficulties at home or at work. Adversities in society
for students include peer pressure, an unfavorable organizational climate, poor social
relationships at home, gender discrimination, a disordered family environment, loneliness,
and so on (Nikam and Uplane, 2013). Students of all ages are subjected to a variety of
adversities. The level of adversity influences learners' personal and professional lives,
resulting in a variety of outcomes. Higher education is an important milestone for every
individual's success after they have completed their secondary education. During their higher
education, students are exposed to a variety of situations that are vastly different from those
encountered in high school. Youth, college or university students, are the future.
The study was aimed at high school students because high school is the foundation for any
higher education they may pursue in the future. Higher education aims to develop
undergraduates holistically, which necessitates a quality-oriented education. Clearly, the
goal of college efforts was to improve college students' overall literacy. The psychological
quality is an important component of overall quality; that is, whether college students have
good psychological quality, particularly coping ability against adversity or resilience
(returning to normalcy) in adversity. This inability to cope with adversity will have an
impact on their life and future development, as well as whether they can become qualified
builders and trustworthy successors for the cause of society. Higher education, which has the
task of preparing leaders for an uncertain and changing future, must provide their students
with the most fundamental trait of resilience, in order for them to face the inevitable
challenges and adversities found in all professions.
Nikam and Uplane (2013), Adversity Quotient and Defense Mechanism of Secondary
School Students, Universal Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 1 (4), pp. 303-308