See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/328761271

Public Institutions in India Consider New Methods of Financing

Article · October 2018

CITATIONS READS
0 92

1 author:

Jinusha Panigrahi
National University of Educational Planning and Administration (NUEPA)
16 PUBLICATIONS   35 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Financing of Public Higher Education Institutions View project

Financing of Public Higher Education Institutions View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jinusha Panigrahi on 06 November 2018.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

Public Institutions in India Consider
New Methods of Financing
Provincial-level private higher education in India has shifted from a mostly public-funded system to a
mostly private-funded system, putting increased pressure on family contributions.

By

Jinusha Panigrahi

October 22, 2018 The World View

https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/world-view/public-institutions-india-consider-
new-methods-financing

2 COMMENTS

Indian higher education system has experienced a major transition during the last decade not only in
terms of the massive participation of diverse students in higher education but also due to the
participation of new private HEIs in general, as well as technical courses. The changing institutional
landscape is the result of the structural adjustment policies and new economic reforms that
encourage market influences in higher education decision making. In response to policy changes, the
public HEIs (PHEIs) have also undergone a major transformation, adopting privatization measures
due to a decline in funding by the central and provincial governments. Along with privatization
measures the provincial universities practice several cost-saving measures that have non-inclusive
implications.
Decline in public funding
India achieved massification of higher education (with 15% GER) in 2009—total enrolment in higher
education has grown from 20.7 million in 2009 to 34.6 million in 2018. By 2015/16, the gross
enrolment ration (GER) had reached 24.5%. There was a rapid expansion in the number of HEIs—
private and public. Public funding has not kept pace with expansion. The expenditure on university
and other tertiary education as a percentage of GDP by central government has declined from 0.34
percent of GDP in 2009-10 to 0.22 percent in 2014-15; the share contributed by provincial
governments declined from 0.56 percent to 0.44 percent during the same period.
Provincial-level PHEIs in India have shifted from a mostly public-funded system to a mostly private-
funded system (putting increased pressure on family contributions) with few exceptions. The recurring
grants from provincial governments and non-recurring grants from the central government taken
together meet 70% or 50% (or at times 30%) of the annual expenditure of provincial PHEIs. Various
strategies are being adopted by these provincial HEIs to compensate for the resource gap in
response to decline in public funding.

Strategy I: Cost-sharing measures

The most common cost-sharing measure is student fees and the addition of courses that operate
under a self-financing scheme that covers the cost of teaching and non-teaching staff charged directly
to students as fees, unlike regular courses in PHEIs where the recurring cost of salaries and other
allowances for teaching and non-teaching staff is borne by the university or college, particularly in
provincial colleges. Apart from tuition fees, there is an examination fee, a “development fee” charged
to students to support infrastructure development (e.g.; labs, auditorium, smart classrooms, etc.) and
an annual/semester fee that results in a major chunk of provincial university income. A “Back Paper
Syndrome” (a term commonly-used for students who repeatedly fail to pass a semester due to anxiety
and must reappear for exams by paying fees for each appearance) results in a fee collected from
deprived groups that exceeds the amount collected from students in the general category at many
provincial universities. The development fee is increasing annually across institutions.
Although, there are student protests against hikes in tuition fees and exemptions for deprived groups,
the overall fee structure is regressive as every student, irrespective of socio-economic background
and gender, has to pay all other fees. Offering courses through distance education is trending as a
cost-sharing measure by provincial universities.
Without any stringent rules for fee structure at the policy level for self-financing courses, the higher
fees for courses (typically in technical or job-oriented area) offered under self-financing mode are
justified by HEIs claiming that they provide advanced level skills that would improve the improve
employability upon completion of the course). These courses increasingly contribute to the income of
aided colleges at provinces.
Strategy II: Income generating activities
To respond to resource shortages, initiatives for leveraging resources are being employed such as
renting out university infrastructure and outsourcing institutional activities. Unlike centrally-funded
HEIs, few provincial universities have infrastructure of sufficient condition or quality to rent them out to
generate revenue although some government-aided colleges have successfully explored this strategy
to a limited extent.
Similarly, the generation of revenue from the outsourcing of university services like food service,
security, canteen, cafeteria, health centre etc. have contributed some income to provincial
universities, but not to the colleges.
Popular income-generating measures such as endowment funds, alumni contributions or other
philanthropic gestures are not significant factors for provincial PHEIs. This celebrated method of
income generation in developed countries through research contracts, consultancy services,
organizing workshops, seminars and conferences and international student mobility holds very little
opportunity for provincial PHEIs with very few exceptions.
University-industry linkages have recently picked up in India in technical and professional courses, but
remain limited options for most PHEIs. Some amount of income is also generated through recovery of
loans and investments in fixed deposits by PHEIs.
Strategy III: Cost saving measures
The most commonly practiced response to the resource crunch is to have add enrolment and manage
with guest faculty, reemployed (retired) faculty, part-time or temporary non-academic staff with lower
remuneration to cut salary and non-salary expenses. Multitasking by both academic and non-
academic staff is another cost-saving measure despite the probability of compromising with quality of
both teaching and learning and administration.
Another important adjustment being made is to distribute scholarship/fellowship allocations meant for
one student among 3-4 students from marginalised groups such as Scheduled Castes (SCs),
Scheduled Tribes (STs) and Other Backward classes (OBCs), women and minorities. Here the very
purpose of scholarship fails.
There are cuts to other academic expenses too, such as sharing of rooms and computers by
academic and non-academic staff, reducing subscriptions to print journals and shifting to online
 journals, using outdated textbooks, and cutting down other administrative, repair and maintenance
expenses. The plight of the affiliated colleges in the provinces, institutions that can run degree
programmes, but are not empowered to award degrees unless they attached to a university, is
becoming pathetic.
Conclusion and Way Forward
Unlike centrally-funded HEIs, the provincial PHEIs confront mounting expenditures, growing
enrolments, and resources shortages due to the decline in public funding. They subsequently resort
to higher tuition fees, self-financing courses, and various cost-saving measures that compromise
academic quality, access to higher education by deprived groups and impact the mid and long-term
growth and development of these institutions.
There is need for policy interventions prioritizing development grants to provincial universities and
colleges if they are to reach a level of competitiveness and quality in the near future as those
institutions are rapidly deteriorating.

Jinusha Panigrahi is assistant professor and co-chairperson, Centre For Policy Research in Higher
Education (CPRHE), National Institute of Educational Planning and Administration in New Delhi and
co-chairperson, Economics and Finance of Education Special Interests Group of the Comparative and
International Education Society (CIES), USA
Read more by
Jinusha Panigrahi

View publication stats