Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Port State Control - Its Human Element - Liberian Registry
Port State Control - Its Human Element - Liberian Registry
2. MOUs statistics
4. Case Studies
5. Conclusions
2
The Liberian Registry Today
ISO 9001: +4,500 Over 166 mil 12% Market Share +500,000
2015 Certified Registered Vessels Gross Tons of World Fleet Active Seafarers
2
Liberia’s Global Network
Of Auditors & Inspectors
•
Quality Reputation (White-Listed)
First-Class PSC Record & Quality Reputation (ISO 9001:2008 accredited company)
6
China & Liberia’s Maritime Agreement
On Maritime Transport
2. MOUs statistics
4. Case Studies
5. Conclusions
8
Port State Control Finding and Observations
TOKYO MOU LIBERIA—ALL SHIP TYPES
3.67%
3.00% 3.44%
3.00% 2.96% 3%
2.90%
2.57%
2.00%
1.00%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Tokyo MOU Overall Liberian Vessels Tokyo MOU
China LIBERIA
No. of Inspection No. of Detention Detention %
2014 551 37 6.72%
3.09% 3.11%
3.00% 2.84%
2.50% 2.02%
2.00% 1.67%
1.50%
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Paris MOU Overall Liberian Vessels Paris MOU
1.55%
1.50% 1.22%
1.15% 1.10% 1.16%
1.00% 0.95%
1.00% 0.86%
0.50%
0.00%
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
USCG Overall Liberian Vessels USCG
QS21 recognizes vessels and flag States which have successfully met specified safety and
quality requirements and regulations when calling ports in the United States.
Agenda
2. MOUs statistics
4. Case Studies
5. Conclusions
15
Fully-Automated
Detention Prevention Program
Liberia pioneered and introduced this unique system in 2015,
and is the only registry to provide this vital service free of
charge.
Benefits :
2. MOUs statistics
4. Case Studies
5. Conclusions
18
Port State Control – Top 5 Detainable Deficiencies
Port State Control – Inspection vs Detention
My perspectives – due to :
➢ Hardware
– Certification, Machinery, Navigation, Emergency, Operations, Safety,
Pollution prevention, Design, etc
➢ “Software”
- First impression & housekeeping
- Communication & Language
- Transparency & Open
- Take immediate action(s), etc
Case Study - MLC
➢ A vessel had come under scrutiny due to a report of poor working conditions and lack
of food. The Flag Administration, upon receiving the report, engaged the DPA, the
local Flag inspector and notified the local port authority of the report and Flag’s plan
for action.
➢ The Administration provided instructions to the DPA of what information to provide to
port authority, and the Flag inspector attended and provided an additional report to
port authority.
➢ The local port authority, upon receiving the updates from the Flag and the DPA
ensuring the working conditions and proper provisioning of the vessel, closed the case
WITHOUT attendance.
➢ Failure to provide this information to port authority in a timely manner would have
resulted in an “Seaworthiness” detention which would have delayed the vessel for
several days while the PSC conducted their investigation.
Case Study – Fire fighting
➢ An oil tanker arriving a port discovered they did had lost some of their low expansion
foam during the transit, and they unfortunately could not account for the loss. The
vessel notified the operator who in turn notified Class and Flag.
➢ The Flag advised the local PSC office and arranged for an inspector to attend the
vessel upon arrival.
➢ The PSCO arrived to conduct a PSC exam, and the Flag inspector was able to assist the
Master in providing the necessary documentation to show they had ordered the foam
and had also put in place risk mitigation measures to ensure the safety of vessel
despite having less than the necessary amount of foam.
➢ As a result of the open communication, the PSC did not issue any adverse PSC actions
on the vessel, and it was allowed to resume normal operations without restrictions.
Case Study
➢ Vessel was inspected by PSC. A total of 12 deficiencies was issued by the PSCO consist of
various defecs and 6 x code 17.
➢ Liberia office immediate carried out Flag State Inspection on the same day.
➢ A total of 14 new deficiencies were found during Flag State Inspection, including:
➢ Illegal modification on fuel oil line
➢ OWS date entry not working for long period of time.
➢ Oil Record Book record show serious discrepancy; after investigation, more than 20MT
of waste oil and bilge water unaccounted.
➢ Be honest
Req’t as per SOLAS Ch I Reg 11
Relaxation afforded with plans
My perspectives – due to :
➢ Hardware
– Certification, Machinery, Navigation, Emergency, Operations, Design,
Safety, Pollution prevention, Design etc
➢ “Software”
- First impression & housekeeping
- Communication & Language
- Transparency & Open
- Take immediate action(s), etc
Agenda
2. MOUs statistics
4. Case Studies
5. Conclusions
27
Conclusions
• Who is actually responsible to ensure quality shipping ?
Owner, Crew, Ship Management, Manning agency, ….. Class, Flag, PSC, IMO, etc
Contact
LISCR Singapore LISCR Singapore 24/7 DUTY OFFICER
Tel: +65 6323 1048 Tang Sau Weng, MD +1 703 963 6216
info@liscr.sg swtang@liscr.com DUTYOFFICER@LISCR.COM