Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Richer of Saint Remi Histories
Richer of Saint Remi Histories
M edieval L ibrary
Richer of Saint-Rémi
histories
volume i
dom l 10
S
R
L
S S
R R
L L
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: ii 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: iii 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 2 6/29/2011 8:16:07 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 3 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM
Contents
Copyright © 2011 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College Introduction vii
all rights reserved
Printed in the united States of America
Prologue 2
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Richer, of Saint-Rémy, 10th cent.
Book 1 7
[Historiae. English & Latin]
Histories / Richer of Saint Rémi ; edited and translated by Justin Lake.
p. cm.—(Dumbarton Oaks medieval library; 10)
Book 2 157
Latin with facing English translation.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBn 978- 0- 674- 06003- 6 (v. I : alk. paper)—ISBn 978- 0- 674- 06159- 0 Note on the Text 379
(v. II : alk. paper) 1. France—History—To 987—Early works to 1800. 2. Notes to the Text 381
France—History—Capetians, 987–1328—Early works to 1800. I. Lake,
Justin. II. Title.
Notes to the Translation 398
DC70.A3R513 2011 Bibliography 421
944¢.01—dc22 2011008840
S S
R R
L L
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: iv 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: v 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 4 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 5 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM
Introduction
vii
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: vi 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: vii 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 6 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 7 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM
introduction introduction
dent kingdoms and the great landed magnates took advan- renown for leading the defense of Paris against a substantial
tage of the quarreling between the heirs of Charlemagne to Viking siege that threatened the city for over a year in 885–
win increasing power and authority for themselves. After 886.
enduring a series of divisions at the hands of the sons and As could be expected, Charles and the faction arrayed
grandsons of Louis the Pious (d. 840), the empire was briely around him did not accept the validity of Odo’s election. In
reunited during the inglorious reign of Charles the Fat (884– 893 Archbishop Fulk of Reims crowned Charles king, lead-
887). But when Charles died in January of 888, having been ing to four years of civil war that came to an end only in 897,
forced to abdicate several weeks earlier, there was no obvi- after Odo agreed to recognize Charles as his successor.
ous successor, and the constituent parts of the empire were When Odo died a year later, Charles became the uncon-
left to go their own way. In each of the successor king- tested king of West Francia, but Odo’s election had created
doms that emerged, non- Carolingian kings quickly assumed a destabilizing precedent, for there were now two different
power. families that could lay claim to the throne. Thus, when the
In West Francia there remained a legitimate Carolingian West Frankish magnates became displeased with Charles’s
heir to the throne: Charles, the eight-year-old son of King entanglements in Lotharingia and his unseemly devotion to
Louis the Stammerer (877–879) and the half-brother of kings his Lotharingian favorite, Hagano, Odo’s brother Robert
Louis III (879–882) and Carloman (879–884). But when the became the focal point of their resistance. Robert rebelled
magnates assembled at Compiègne in February of 888 to against Charles and had himself crowned king in 922. Al-
elect a new king, they passed over Charles and elevated though his rival was killed a year later at the Battle of Sois-
Odo, count of Paris, to the throne instead. They did so for sons, Charles did not regain his throne. He was instead be-
practical reasons: “not as traitors,” Richer says, “but as men trayed and imprisoned by Count Heribert of Vermandois,
indignant against their enemies.”3 These enemies were the whereupon Robert’s son-in-law, Radulf, duke of Burgundy,
Vikings, who had inlicted tremendous damage on the Car- became king. When Radulf died in 936, Robert’s son, Hugh
olingian empire in the latter decades of the ninth century the Great, engineered the return of Charles’s exiled son
and posed a continual threat to West Francia, with its long Louis from England (for reasons that are not entirely clear),
coastline and easily navigable rivers. In contrast to Charles, and the Carolingians were reestablished on the throne. The
who would not reach the age of majority for several more authority of Louis IV (936–954), however, was severely cir-
years, Odo was an established military commander with a cumscribed by Hugh, who assumed the grandiose title “duke
secure power base who could confront the Viking threat im- of the Franks” and sought to exercise a supervisory role over
mediately. As count of Paris and Orléans and lay abbot of the king whom he had brought to power. Louis and his son
Saint-Martin of Tours, he was one of the most powerful S S Lothar (954–986) maintained control of the West Frankish
magnates of the realm. Moreover, he had won considerable R R throne for ifty years, but on the death of Lothar’s son Louis
L L
viii ix
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: viii 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: ix 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 8 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 9 6/29/2011 8:16:08 AM
introduction introduction
in 987, the magnates rejected the claims of Louis’s uncle stated theme of the “conlicts of the Gauls” (congressus Gal-
Charles, duke of Lower Lotharingia, and chose Robert’s lorum) is a second narrative thread of equal importance, the
grandson Hugh (later known as Hugh Capet) as king. The church of Reims. Richer’s monastery of Saint-Rémi was lo-
result was a rebellion by Charles that nearly succeeded in cated less than a mile from Reims and was closely tied to the
toppling Hugh. The century of conlict between the Caro- archiepiscopal see. Saint-Rémi housed the relics of its epon-
lingian and Robertian royal houses for dominance in West ymous patron, Saint Remigius, the “apostle of the Franks,”
Francia was only brought to a close—although this could who had converted the Frankish king Clovis to Christianity
not have been obvious to Richer or his contemporaries—by and anointed him with oil from a sacred vial, by virtue of
the defeat and imprisonment of Charles in 991 and the un- which future archbishops of Reims claimed the right to con-
contested accession of Hugh’s son Robert ive and a half secrate the king of the Franks. In Richer’s day Reims was a
years later. nerve center of political and ecclesiastical power in West
The decades-long Carolingian-Robertian conlict helped Francia. The archbishop of Reims exercised authority over
undermine the power of the West Frankish monarchy, and eleven episcopal sees and wielded supreme power in the
with royal authority ineffective or nonexistent throughout county, making him one of the kingdom’s most powerful
much of the realm, ambitious magnates seized every oppor- magnates. The position was thus highly sought-after, and
tunity to aggrandize themselves, frequently at the expense Richer’s history narrates in detail two long-running disputes
of the king. The pages of Richer’s Historia are illed with over control of the archbishopric, the irst pitting Heribert
stories of the audacity, cunning, and rapacious violence of of Vermandois’s irregularly elected son Hugh against his
the great magnates of West Francia, men such as Hugh the sometime replacement Artald, and the second involving
Great, Heribert of Vermandois, Arnulf of Flanders, Odo of Gerbert’s acquisition of the see and his efforts to hold on to
Blois, and Fulk nerra of Anjou. Factional strife among the it following the deposition of his predecessor, Arnulf, at the
leading men—dissidentia principum—was a fact of life in synod of Saint-Basle in 991.
tenth-century West Francia, both a cause and a symptom Books 3 and 4 of the Historia focus heavily on Gerbert,
of the weak monarchy. The struggles of the West Frankish Richer’s patron and dedicatee, and Archbishop Adalbero
kings to make their authority felt in the face of the internal (969–989), who was responsible for bringing Gerbert to
disorder generated by the magnates and the external threats Reims and who helped to inaugurate a period of intellectual
posed by the Vikings, Hungarian raiders, and the German and cultural revival in his see. The scion of a noble Lotharin-
kings east of the Rhine constitute the principal subject mat- gian family who had been educated at the reformed monas-
ter of Richer’s work. tery of Gorze, Adalbero came to Reims from Metz, where,
The scope of his history extends beyond the West Frank- S S like his predecessor Odelric, he had been a cathedral canon.
ish kings and their wars, however. Interwoven with the R R upon taking ofice he undertook a series of reform mea-
L L
x xi
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: x 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xi 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 10 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 11 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM
introduction introduction
sures, renovating the cathedral of Reims and bringing the detail how he introduced innovations such as the abacus and
canons together under a communal rule, reorganizing the the armillary sphere at Reims. He was also a self-professed
monasteries of Mouzon and Saint-Thierry, and traveling to Ciceronian and a devoted student of classical rhetoric, and
Rome to secure a papal privilege for the monastery of Saint- his surviving letters bear witness to his diligent efforts to
Rémi.4 He also advanced Gerbert’s career when he arrived seek out new manuscripts of authors such as Cicero and
in Reims, appointing him to be head of the cathedral school5 Quintilian. Gerbert’s tenure as scholasticus at Reims secured
and (according to Gerbert himself) eventually designating his reputation as one of the most learned men in the Latin
him as his successor.6 West. It was partly as a result of his growing fame that he
Richer’s account of Gerbert’s early career and curriculum was brought to Ravenna by Otto II of Germany to engage
at Reims is justiiably one of the best-known parts of his his- in a disputation with the Saxon scholar Otric of Magdeburg,
tory.7 Educated at the monastery of Saint- Gerald of Aurillac who had impugned his taxonomy of the parts of philosophy.
in the Auvergne, Gerbert was sent to Spain by his abbot The disputation was a triumph for Gerbert, who was re-
after a visit from Count Borrell of Barcelona, who subse- warded by Otto with the prestigious Italian abbey of Bob-
quently entrusted him to the care of Bishop Hatto of Vich bio. In Italy, however, Gerbert found himself beleaguered
for instruction. He later traveled with Borrell and Hatto to by refractory monks and hostile landowners, and in 984 he
Rome, where he so impressed Pope John XIII with his in- returned to Reims to take up his former position at the ca-
tellectual talents that he was given an audience with the thedral school.
German emperor Otto I. This proved to be a meeting of After the death of Adalbero in 989, Hugh Capet passed
lasting importance, for it began a relationship between Ger- over Gerbert and appointed Arnulf, the bastard son of King
bert and the Ottonian emperors that would last for three Lothar, to the see of Reims as part of an attempt to neutral-
decades and see Gerbert promoted to a series of increas- ize Carolingian opposition to his rule. Shortly after swear-
ingly prominent Church ofices with help from the backing ing an oath of fealty to Hugh, however, Arnulf threw in his
of his German patrons. Gerbert left Rome for Reims shortly lot with his rebellious uncle Charles and delivered the city
thereafter in order to study logica (the arts of dialectic and of Reims to him. Charles and Arnulf were subsequently be-
rhetoric) with the celebrated schoolmaster Gerannus, and trayed and captured by Bishop Adalbero of Laon in the
in 972 Adalbero appointed him master of the cathedral spring of 991, marking the end of Carolingian resistance to
school. Hugh. At the synod of Saint-Basle in June of 991, Arnulf was
Perhaps as a result of his time in Spain, with its access to forced to abdicate his ofice, and shortly thereafter Gerbert
the riches of Arab learning, Gerbert possessed an unparal- was chosen archbishop in his place. A signiicant opposition
leled knowledge of the quadrivium (the arts of arithmetic, S S faction refused to accept Arnulf ’s deposition, however, and
geometry, music, and astronomy), and Richer describes in R R Gerbert’s position remained uncertain at Reims, where Ar-
L L
xii xiii
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xii 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xiii 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 12 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 13 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM
introduction introduction
nulf still had considerable support. At the synod of Mouzon arguments for the validity of his claim to the see of Reims.
in 995, which was presided over by a legate of Pope John XV, Whether Richer was instructed to write his Historia by Ger-
Gerbert agreed to suspend saying mass temporarily until bert is less clear. He alludes to a command from Gerbert in
the dispute could be settled. He spent the next two years in his prologue, but the invocation of a commission from a
an ultimately vain attempt to defend his claim to the see of dedicatee was one of the most common of medieval prefa-
Reims against Arnulf ’s supporters, and in 997 he left Reims tory topoi, and it should not be taken as proof that Gerbert
for the court of Otto III of Germany, who appointed him actually asked Richer to write. It is equally possible that the
archbishop of Ravenna (998) and then pope (999–1003), at strongly pro- Gerbertian tone of the Historia stemmed from
which time he took the name Sylvester II. Richer’s desire to win Gerbert’s esteem and patronage, or
Richer includes an abridged version of Gerbert’s own perhaps some more tangible reward. The precise nature of
Acta of the synod of Saint-Basle in Book 4, and he intended the relationship between the two men eludes us. It is fre-
to include a similar account of the synod of Mouzon, al- quently assumed, on the basis of Richer’s detailed knowl-
though this section either dropped out of the manuscript or edge of Gerbert’s curriculum, that he must have been a stu-
was never completed. The narrative portion of the Historia dent of Gerbert, but this cannot be proven. The two men
comes to a stop at the conclusion of the synod of Mouzon. did, however, share common intellectual interests, notably
It is followed by a series of brief notes (apparently material rhetoric and medicine, and Richer had access not only to
for a future continuation), the last two of which report on Gerbert’s synodal acts but also to his letters, which suggests
Gerbert’s appointment to the see of Ravenna and Pope that they were on familiar terms. Whether or not Richer
Gregory V’s decision to allow Arnulf to resume his former was ever a student of Gerbert’s at the cathedral school of
position as archbishop of Reims. Richer evidently stopped Reims, he clearly viewed Gerbert as an intellectual mentor.
writing when it became clear that Gerbert was not return- Our knowledge of Richer himself is limited to what can
ing to Reims, but he found a way to transmit the manuscript be gleaned from the pages of his history. His father, Rodulf,
to him. Our sole surviving copy of his history is found in the was a vassal (miles) of King Louis IV, and he continued to
cathedral library of Bamberg, where Gerbert’s personal li- serve Queen Gerberga after Louis’s death in 954. In Richer’s
brary was deposited after his death. telling, Rodulf was one of the king’s closest advisers—a pru-
Given that Richer dedicated his history to Gerbert, de- dent counselor and clever military tactician who devised a
scribed his “enlightenment” of Gaul in panegyrical tones, successful scheme to retake the city of Laon from Hugh the
and reproduced (or intended to reproduce) major portions Great in 949 and engineered the capture of the stronghold
of Gerbert’s Acta of the synods of Saint-Basle and Mouzon of Mons seven years later.8 Rodulf ’s ties to Louis IV help to
in his work, it is clear that the Historia was intended at least S S explain Richer’s entrance into the prestigious monastery of
in part to burnish Gerbert’s reputation and recapitulate his R R Saint-Rémi, which was closely associated with the Carolin-
L L
xiv xv
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xiv 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xv 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 14 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 15 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM
introduction introduction
gian kings. There is no way of knowing when Richer entered tradition of historical writing at Reims, a tradition inaugu-
Saint-Rémi, nor does he describe his time there, but the rated by Archbishop Hincmar (845–882), who wrote both a
Historia reveals that he was a person of considerable learn- Life of Saint Remigius and the third and inal section of the
ing and intellectual ambition. He was widely read in the his- so-called Annals of Saint-Bertin. In his prologue Richer pres-
torians of classical and late antiquity (notably Caesar, Sal- ents his history as a continuation of Hincmar’s annals, which
lust, Livy, and Hegesippus), and the Historia is full of direct came to an end at his death in 882. Hincmar found a worthy
and indirect echoes of their work.9 He was also capable of successor in Flodoard (894–966), a canon of the cathedral
describing the technical aspects of Gerbert’s curriculum in of Reims who wrote two of the most important works of
language that indicates he had received a thorough training tenth-century Latin historiography: Annals covering the
in the liberal arts. Like Gerbert, he was devoted to the study years 919–966, and the massive and enormously erudite His-
of classical rhetoric, and he composed dozens of speeches tory of the Church of Reims.12 Richer used both of Flodoard’s
to put into the mouths of his characters. Indeed, the impor- histories as source material, but the Annals were his most
tance of persuasive speaking is one of the distinguishing fea- important source by far. Indeed, much of the irst half of his
tures of the Historia, in which almost every important event history (from 1.15 to 3.21) is a rewriting of the Annals in one
is preceded by a formal oration of some sort. way or another. Reworking the material of one’s predeces-
Richer also reveals a keen interest in two subjects that sors was standard practice for medieval historiographers,
fell outside of the scope of the standard medieval curricu- but Richer was keen to show that he was not merely compil-
lum: siege craft and medicine. On three occasions he de- ing a tissue of excerpts from Flodoard. He states in the pro-
scribes the construction of siege engines in precise techni- logue that he “did not use the same words” as Flodoard, “but
cal detail, and he demonstrates a particular fondness for different ones,” and that he employed “a very different
describing the mortal illnesses of his characters, with de- style.” In fact, the manuscript shows that in his irst draft
tailed lists of symptoms drawn from medical textbooks.10 In Richer boasted that his rhetorical style was “far superior” to
a fascinating autobiographical excursus, he gives an account Flodoard’s, before he reconsidered and toned down his lan-
of an arduous journey that he took to Chartres to read medi- guage. Stylistic concerns were thus of paramount impor-
cal manuscripts at the behest of his friend Heribert.11 Given tance to Richer, who sought to take the bare-bones struc-
the level of Richer’s learning and his desire to parade that ture of Flodoard’s Annals and transform it into a true
learning in the pages of his history, it is safe to assume that narrative history in the classical mold.
he was part of the learned elite in his own community and Despite the importance accorded to his work as one of
probably tied into a broader network of scholarly monks the only narrative sources for the political and ecclesiastical
and clerics in West Francia. S S history of late tenth-century West Francia, Richer has won
Richer saw himself as the continuator of a distinguished R R few admirers as a historian. Robert Latouche, who produced
L L
xvi xvii
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xvi 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xvii 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 16 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 17 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM
introduction introduction
the last translation of the Historia over seventy years ago, the rules of classical rhetoric. To make his history “plau-
could scarcely contain his irritation at the author’s casual re- sible,” he was obligated to lesh out his source material
lationship with the truth.13 There is no denying that Richer through a process of ampliication and rhetorical invention.
was a careless and frequently inaccurate historian. His ac- The result is a history that juxtaposes events that actually
count of the royal lineage of Charles the Simple, for exam- happened (quae vere gesta sunt) with the kinds of things that
ple, is highly confused.14 He incorrectly calculates Louis IV’s very well could have happened (quae geri potuerunt).
age at his death and the length of Lothar’s reign, despite the Richer’s intended audience and the ultimate purpose of
fact that the necessary information was readily available to the Historia remain matters of debate. It is clear that much
him.15 He frequently invents or exaggerates army sizes and of what he wrote was intended speciically for Gerbert’s
casualty statistics, in one case quoting Flodoard as a source eyes, and the focus on the archbishopric of Reims and the
for a number not found in either of his predecessor’s histori- monastery of Saint-Rémi suggests that it was intended to be
cal works.16 Equally frustrating to those who turn to Richer read by the monastic and clerical community of Reims. The
as a source for the history of tenth-century West Francia is second half of the Historia can be read in part as an apologia
his fondness for rhetorical inventio, the imaginative genera- for Gerbert and a defense of his claims to the see of Reims.
tion of material needed to make a narrative believable to its But if Richer wrote with the speciic intention of helping
audience. In Richer’s case, inventio most frequently takes Gerbert, it is not immediately obvious why he chose to em-
the form of freely invented speeches and conversations and bed his pro- Gerbertian material within a four-book history
detailed descriptions of battles, siege engines, and diseases of the West Frankish kings and their wars.
for which he was highly unlikely to have had access to eye- Because Richer’s stated theme is political history, and be-
witness accounts. cause he wrote in the aftermath of the failed rebellion of
Richer’s tendency to embellish the material he took from Charles of Lotharingia, scholars have long been interested
Flodoard’s Annals by adding circumstantial details and in- in determining how his own political allegiances may have
venting speeches was neither arbitrary nor unusual, how- shaped what he wrote.17 On the basis of his father’s ser vice
ever. On the contrary, it was entirely consistent with the to Louis IV and his generally favorable portrayal of the Car-
conventions of classical historiography. When Richer tells olingian kings, some have identiied Richer as a Carolingian
the reader in his prologue that he intends to treat his sub- partisan. Others have pointed to Adalbero’s speech in favor
ject matter “plausibly, clearly, and concisely,” he is not merely of the election of Hugh Capet in Book 4 as evidence that
recycling a well-worn prefatory topos. He is citing the three Richer had reconciled himself to support the Capetian dy-
“virtues of narrative” recommended by the rhetorical hand- nasty backed by both Adalbero and Gerbert.18 In truth, the
books of classical antiquity, thereby signaling to the reader S S text of the Historia does not present unambiguous support
his intention to treat his history as a narratio governed by R R for either dynasty. The Carolingian kings are generally pre-
L L
xviii xix
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xviii 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xix 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 18 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 19 6/29/2011 8:16:09 AM
introduction introduction
sented with sympathy, but Richer is not shy about criticiz- ling Monumenta Germaniae Historica and Richer’s irst edi-
ing Charles the Simple’s foolish devotion to Hagano or the tor.22 not only is Bamberg MS Hist. 5 the sole surviving copy
immaturity and vanity of Louis V.19 With the possible excep- of Richer’s history, it is also his autograph manuscript. Its
tion of Lothar, whose reign ends with a modestly successful ifty-seven folios are illed with corrections, erasures, and
military campaign in Lotharingia, the impression left of the expunged but still-legible passages that testify to various
Carolingian kings in the Historia is primarily one of weak- stages of composition and revision. At Bamberg, where the
ness and persecution. By contrast, the Robertians—Odo, Historia is attested in a twelfth-century library catalog, three
Robert I, Hugh the Great, and Hugh Capet—for the most authors are known to have used it as a source. A fragment
part exude strength and competence, but their legitimacy is from an anonymous eleventh-century Historia Francorum
frequently called into question. On several occasions Richer draws on Richer’s account of the “Customs of the Gauls” at
refers to Robert as a “tyrant” and a “usurper,” and Hugh the 1.3.23 The medieval historian Frutolf of Michelsberg (d. 1103)
Great, who is himself frequently called a “tyrant,” admits and the German Renaissance humanist Johannes Trithemius
that his father acted unjustly in ruling while Charles the (1462–1516) also drew on Richer as a source. Interestingly,
Simple still lived.20 Hugh Capet is depicted as being con- both of these authors restrict themselves to the irst two
scious of acting wrongly in assuming the throne in place of books of the Historia (Trithemius refers to it explicitly as
Charles of Lotharingia, and on the inal folio of the manu- a two-book history), and both disagree with Bamberg MS
script Richer refers to the “treachery” of Robert the Pious, Hist. 5, making it very likely that another redaction of Ri-
Hugh’s son and successor, for having released Arnulf from cher’s history once existed at Bamberg.24 The monastic
captivity.21 In sum, it is dificult to support the argument chronicler Hugh of Flavigny (ca. 1065–1114) borrowed from
that Richer wrote as part of an attempt to burnish the claims Richer’s account of Gerbert’s career for his Chronicon, but
of either the Carolingian or the Robertian house. To the de- there is no evidence that he took a trip to Bamberg;25 hence
gree that the Historia presents a consistent political view- it is possible that another edition of the Historia similar to
point, it is a conventional one: the desire for a strong and that which is contained in Bamberg MS Hist. 5 once existed
legitimate king who could stamp out civil strife (dissidentia in northern France.26 We have no way of knowing whether
principum) and bring peace to the realm. Richer’s own monastery preserved a copy of his work, since
The Historia itself is uninished and its survival a matter most of the holdings of the library of Saint-Rémi were de-
of good fortune, for it does not appear to have circulated stroyed by ire in 1774.
widely in the Middle Ages. Only one copy is extant: Bam- A few aspects of Richer’s diction deserve brief mention.
berg, Staatsbibliothek MS Hist. 5, which was discovered by The word virtus, which in classical Latin encompassed quali-
the Bamberg librarian Heinrich Joachim Jaeck in 1833 and S S ties such as bravery and perseverance that were associated
presented to Georg Heinrich Pertz, coeditor of the ledg- R R with ideal manliness, acquires a certain vagueness in Ri-
L L
xx xxi
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xx 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxi 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 20 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 21 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM
introduction introduction
cher’s hands.27 It has thus been variously translated as “virtue,” ever, accurately relect the political realities of tenth-century
“excellence,” “power,” “strength,” “skill,” and “courage,” de- Francia, and even this anachronistic terminology is not used
pending on the context. Richer uses tyrannus not necessarily consistently. In his geographical prologue, for example,
to refer to despots but to designate those who, like Heribert Richer, following Caesar, deines Aquitaine as the area be-
of Vermandois, Hugh the Great, and Charles of Lotharingia, tween the Garonne River and the Pyrenees (1.2). Yet he im-
challenge legitimate royal authority. The word oppidum is a mediately abandons this deinition and uses Aquitaine in its
general term that describes any kind of fortiied settlement traditional medieval signiication to refer the area between
(a stronghold or a fortiied town), whereas castrum appears, the Loire and the Garonne. He uses Belgica as a synonym for
for the most part, to refer to a particular kind of fortiica- Flodoard’s regnum Lotharii to denote Lotharingia, but (again
tion: a stone fortress surrounded by walls.28 The word miles following Caesar) places its western boundary at the Marne
is used in three overlapping senses in the Historia, to mean River instead of the Meuse, the traditional western bound-
soldier, vassal, and member of “the warrior class” (ordo mili- ary of Lotharingia since the Treaty of Verdun in 843. This
taris).29 What unites all three of these deinitions is that in had the effect of putting cities like Reims (1.14) and Soissons
every instance the miles was a professional warrior who pro- (1.21) inside Belgica, even though neither was considered
vided military ser vice to a lord. Eques (“knight”) overlaps to part of Lotharingia. Gallia Celtica is deined early on as the
a large extent with miles, so that ordo militaris (“warrior class”) area between the Garonne and the Marne (1.2), but in the
and ordo equestris (“knightly order”) probably refer to the Historia itself Richer treats it as the area between the Loire
same group of people. This was not a particularly elite group, and the Marne. Richer may in fact have ended up confusing
as is evident from Adalbero of Reims’s criticism of Charles himself by using Caesar’s tripartite division of Gaul, since at
of Lotharingia for taking a wife de militari ordine (4.11) or an 1.12 he includes Reims within Celtic Gaul and two chapters
expunged passage in which Richer explains that Odo (a vir later puts it in Belgica.32 His decision to use this terminol-
militaris whose father was of the ordo equestris) was unable to ogy probably stems in part from his classicizing tendencies,
repress feuding among the milites because “they sometimes but he may also have chosen to use Gallia Belgica over reg-
scorned to be subject to a person of middling status” (eo quod num Lotharii to make a comment about the legitimacy of
milites mediocri interdum subdi contempnerent).30 West Frankish overlordship in Lotharingia. For there could
Richer’s geographical terminology is idiosyncratic and be no question but that the king of Gallia should by rights
occasionally confusing. Lacking a word to denote the terri- exercise dominion in Gallia Belgica.
tory that historians today call West Francia, he employs the
classical moniker Gaul, and drawing on Caesar’s Bellum Gal-
licum, he divides Gaul into three parts: Aquitaine, Celtic S S The translator’s task has been made substantially easier by
Gaul, and Belgica.31 These territorial divisions did not, how- R R the work of Hartmut Hoffmann, who published a new edi-
L L
xxii xxiii
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxii 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxiii 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 22 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 23 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM
introduction introduction
tion of Richer’s Historia for the Monumenta Germaniae 9 For a complete catalog of Richer’s citations of and allusions to classical
Historica in 2000 and an accompanying study in Deutsches authors, see the index in Hoffmann, Richeri historiarum libri IIII, pp. 315–
25.
Archiv für Erforschung des Mittelalters. Serious students of
10 For siege engines, see Hist. 2.10, 3.105, and 4.22. Richer’s medical knowl-
Richer will need to consult the notes in Hoffmann’s edition, edge is analyzed by MacKinney, “Tenth- Century Medicine as Seen in the
which also contains a facsimile of the manuscript. I have Historia.”
beneited from being able to consult the previous transla- 11 Hist. 4.50.
tions of Jerome Guadet, Karl von der Osten- Sacken, and 12 See Philippe Lauer, ed., Les Annales de Flodoard. Collection de textes
Robert Latouche, and I have been fortunate to receive help pour servir à l’étude et à l’enseignement de l’histoire (Paris: Alphonse
Picard, 1905), and Martina Stratmann, ed., Flodoardus Remensis: Historia
from many people. In particular I would like to thank Jan
Remensis Ecclesiae, Monumenta Germaniae Historica SS 36 (Hanover: Hahn,
Ziolkowski, Danuta Shanzer, Greg Hays, Michael Winter- 1998).
bottom, David Bachrach, Bruce Eastwood, and Mayke 13 Latouche, Richer: Histoire de France. See, for example, vol. I, p. xi: “Il est
de Jong. These volumes are dedicated with gratitude to my donc dangereux de le suivre et son témoinage est toujours suspect,” and
parents. vol. I, p. 133 n. 2: “Richer n’a pas de scrupules d’historien.”
14 Hist. 1.4.
15 Hist. 2.103, 3.109.
Justin Lake
16 Hist. 1.46. See also 1.49, 1.51, 2.35, and 2.85 for invented or exaggerated
January 2011 casualty igures.
17 See Wolfgang Giese, “Genus” und “Virtus,” pp. 10–16, and Gian Andria
Notes Bezzola, Das Ottonische Kaisertum in der französischen Geschichtsschreibung des
1 For the dates of composition, see Hoffmann, “Die Historien Richers 10. und beginnenden 11. Jahrhunderts (Graz: Hermann Böhlau, 1956), pp. 105–
von Saint-Remi,” esp. pp. 446 and 453–55. 45. The most recent summary of scholarly approaches to the political ide-
2 “West Francia” was not a name used by Richer, or any contemporary ology of Richer’s Historia is found in Glenn, Politics and History in the Tenth
author, but a term of convenience adopted by scholars to describe the ter- Century, pp. 5–6.
ritory ceded to Charles the Bald at the Treaty of Verdun in 843, lands that 18 See Kortüm, Richer von Saint-Remi, pp. 46–49.
formed the core of the later kingdom of France. It was the lack of a gener- 19 Hist. 1.14–16, 3.95. For Richer’s portrayal of the West Frankish kings,
ally agreed-upon designation for this territory that led Richer to adopt the see in particular Giese, “Genus” und “Virtus.”
anachronistic term Gallia. See Jean Dunbabin, France in the Making (new 20 Hist. 1.21, 1.45, 2.2. Hugh is called a tyrant at 2.22, 24, 26–28, 36, 48, 81,
York: Oxford university Press, 1985), pp. 1–5. 82, 85, and 87.
3 Hist. 1.4. 21 Hist. 4.39, 4.109.
4 Hist. 3.22–42. 22 For an account of Jaeck’s presentation of the manuscript to Pertz and
5 Hist. 3.42. his traveling companion, Johannes Böhmer, see Glenn, Politics and History,
6 Hist. 4.102. pp. 269–73.
7 Hist. 3.43–54. S S 23 See Hoffmann, “Die Historien Richers von Saint-Remi,” pp. 520–25.
8 Hist. 2.87–90, 3.7–10. R R 24 See ibid., pp. 508–20.
L L
xxiv xxv
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxiv 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxv 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 24 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 25 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM
introduction
S S
R R
L L
xxvi
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: xxvi 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 1 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 26 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 1 6/29/2011 8:16:10 AM
Prologus Prologue
Domino ac beatissimo patri Gerberto1 Remorum archiepis- To my Lord and most blessed father Gerbert,1 Archbishop
copo, Richerus monachus: of Reims, the monk Richer:
Gallorum congressibus in volumine regerendis imperii The authority of your command, most holy father Ger-
tui, pater sanctissime Gerberte, auctoritas seminarium de- bert, provided the seedbed for the conlicts of the Gauls to
dit. Quam, quia summam utilitatem affert, et rerum materia be compiled in a book. Because the advantages to be real-
sese multiplex praebet, eo animi nisu complector qua iuben- ized are so great, and because the subject matter is so abun-
tis mira benivolentia pertrahor. Cuius rei initium a vicino dant, I have embraced this task as eagerly as I was drawn
ducendum existimavi,2 cum res multo ante gestas dignae3 by the marvelous goodwill of the one making the request.
memoriae Hincmarus, ante te in pontiicatu VIII,4 suis an- I have judged it best to begin with recent events because
nalibus copiosissime annexuit. Hincmar2 of blessed memory, who was eighth in the of-
Tantoque superiora lector ea inveniet quanto a nostri ice of archbishop before you,3 so comprehensively wove
opusculi exordio per eius regesta sese attollet. Et hoc in- together the deeds of the more distant past in his own
quam ne Karolorum aliorumque frequens in utroque opere annals.4
repetitio operis utriusque ordinem turbet. ubi enim rerum The further back the reader goes from the beginning of
ordo non advertitur, tanto nitentem error confundit quanto my work through Hincmar’s history, the earlier the material
a serie ordinis errantem seducit. unde cum hic atque illic that he will ind. I say this so that the frequent repetition of
sepe Karoli, sepe Ludovici notae offeruntur, pro tempore the name Charles and of other names in each work will not
cause any confusion about their respective order. For when
the sequence of events is not attended to, error will con-
found the struggling reader to the degree that it leads him
astray from the proper order. Therefore, because the names
S S Charles and Louis appear often in both works, the careful
R R reader will distinguish between kings who share the same
L L
2 3
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 2 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 3 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 2 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 3 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM
histories prologue
auctorum prudens lector reges aequivocos pernotabit. Quo- name by referring to the different time periods of the au-
rum temporibus bella a Gallis saepenumero patrata varios- thors. My particular goal is to recall to memory in writing
que eorum tumultus ac diversas negotiorum rationes ad the frequent wars waged by the Gauls during the reigns of
memoriam reducere scripto specialiter propositum est. Si these kings, their various struggles, and the different rea-
qua vero aliorum efferantur, ob incidentes rationes quae vi- sons for their undertakings. If the affairs of others are men-
tari non potuerunt id evenisse putetur. Sed si ignotae anti- tioned, let it be assumed that this is due to incidental rea-
quitatis ignorantiae arguar, ex quodam Flodoardi presbiteri sons that could not be avoided. now if I am accused of being
Remensis libello me aliqua sumpsisse non abnuo, at non ignorant of the unknown past, I do not deny that I took
verba quidem eadem, sed alia pro aliis longe diverso5 oratio- some things from a certain book of Flodoard,5 a priest of
nis6 scemate disposuisse res ipsa evidentissime demonstrat. Reims, but the content itself shows very clearly that I did
Satisque lectori ieri arbitror, si probabiliter atque dilucide not use the same words, but different ones, and that I em-
breviterque omnia digesserim.7 In dicendo enim recusans ployed a very different rhetorical style. I think that the
efluere, plurima succincte expediam. Ac totius exordium reader will be satisied if I have set forth everything plau-
narrationis aggrediar, breviter facta orbis divisione Gallia- sibly, clearly, and concisely. For by declining to be long-
que in partes distributa, eo quod eius populorum mores et winded, I will reveal many things succinctly. I will begin the
actus describere propositum sit. prologue to the work as a whole after I have briely made a
explicit prologus. division of the world and divided Gaul into its parts, since it
is my intention to describe the customs and deeds of its in-
habitants.
S S
R R
L L
4 5
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 4 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 5 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 4 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 5 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM
BOOK OnE
S S
R R
L L
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 6 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 7 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 6 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 7 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM
1 1
8 9
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 8 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 9 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 8 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 9 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM
histories book 1
2 2
S S
R R
L L
10 11
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 10 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 11 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 10 6/29/2011 8:16:11 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 11 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM
histories book 1
3 3
12 13
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 12 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 13 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 12 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 13 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM
histories book 1
dunt. Post vero a sancto Remigio baptizati, adprime clara successful in almost everything that they did, even while
semper victoria10 emicuisse feruntur. Quorum quoque pri- they were pagans. But after they had been baptized by Saint
mus rex christianus Clodoveus fuisse traditur. A quo per Remigius, they are said to have shone continually in very
succedentia tempora imperatoribus egregiis res publica gu- famous victories.8 It is said that Clovis was their irst Chris-
bernata fuisse dinoscitur, usque ad Karolum, a quo historiae tian king. Starting with him and through the succeeding
sumimus initium. years, the kingdom is known to have been ruled by illustri-
ous emperors, down to the time of Charles,9 with whom I
shall begin my history.
4 4
14 15
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 14 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 15 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 14 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 15 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM
histories book 1
vectum,13 nemo regni tutelam quaerebat. Aliena adquirere one’s chief goal was to acquire the property of others, and
summum cuique erat, nec rem suam provehere videbatur no one was thought to have increased his fortunes unless he
qui alieni aliquid non addebat. unde et omnium concordia had added someone else’s possessions to his own. As a re-
in summam discordiam relapsa est. Hinc direptiones, hinc sult, universal harmony lapsed into complete and utter dis-
incendia, hinc rerum pervasiones exarsere. Quae cum im- cord, and outbreaks of pillaging, burning, and seizures of
manissime agitarentur, piratae qui Rhodomensem provin- property followed. While these acts of savagery were being
ciam incolebant, quae est Celticae Galliae pars, ad rerum perpetrated, the pirates who inhabited the territory around
immanitatem incitantur. Haec gens ab insulis oceani sep- Rouen (which is a part of Celtic Gaul) were themselves
tentrionalis remotioribus diu ante exierat. Et per maria er- roused to savage deeds. This nation had long ago left the
rando classe devecta, summam hanc Galliarum partem atti- distant islands of the northern sea, and after traversing the
gerat. Saepe quoque eam armis impetivit, saepe etiam a seas with their leet in a haphazard fashion, had reached this
terrae principibus devicta occubuit. Quod cum multoties corner of Gaul.12 They attacked it many times, and many
inter sese moverent, visum fuit Gallie primatibus ut dono times they were vanquished and laid low by the leading men
regum haec provincia ei conferretur, ita tamen, ut idolatria of the land. After both sides had engaged one another in
penitus relicta, christianae religioni se ideliter manciparet, battle on many occasions, the magnates of Gaul agreed that
necnon et regibus Galliarum terra marique ideliter mili- this province should be turned over to the pirates by virtue
taret. Huius provinciae metropolis Rhodomum esse dinos- of a royal grant, but only on the condition that they com-
citur, sex tantum urbibus, Baiocis videlicet, Abrincanto, pletely abandon idolatry, faithfully dedicate themselves to
Ebrocis, Sagio, Constantiae, Lisoio vim suae dominationis the Christian religion, and serve the kings of Gaul loyally as
intendens. Hanc itaque ex antiquo a piratis possessam esse their vassals on land and on sea.13 (Rouen is the metropoli-
manifestum est. Sed paterna tunc sevitia ducti, in principes tan see of this province, and its authority extends over just
dissidentes moliri conantur. unde et latrociniis ac discursio- six cities: Bayeux, Avranches, Évreux, Sées, Coutances, and
nibus Brittanniam minorem, quae est Galliae contigua at- Lisieux.) It is clear, then, that the pirates have held this ter-
que militans, infestare aggrediuntur. Reique occasionem ritory from the distant past. But at that moment, driven by
nacti, idem penitus abrumpunt ulteriusque procedunt in their ancestral savagery, they attempted to take advantage
Galliam. Ac circumquaque palantes, longe lateque diffun- of the dissension among the leading men. They advanced
into Brittany, which borders on and is held as a ief of Gaul,
and harried it with pillaging and raids. Then, seizing the op-
portunity that was before them, they completely broke the
S S agreement that they had made and marched into Gaul. Scat-
R R tering in all directions, they spread far and wide, carrying off
L L
16 17
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 16 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 17 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 16 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 17 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM
histories book 1
duntur, feminarum, puerorum, pecudum, ceterarumque re- a considerable haul of women, children, livestock, and other
rum non modicam predam abducentes. Recipiuntur vero property, after which they withdrew with all of this plunder
cum his omnibus secus Sequanam loco qui Giuoldi fossa to a place called Jeufosse on the Seine. Through constant
nuncupatur. Ac idem sepius aggresi, Galliae Celticae partem raiding they harried almost all of that part of Gaul that lies
quae Sequanae Ligerique luviis interiacet, quae et neustria between the Seine and the Loire, which is called neustria.
nuncupatur, totam pene insectati sunt. Hisque animo inerat Their intention was to invade the inner regions of Gaul and
interiores Galliarum partes irrumpere earumque gentes aut either drive the inhabitants from their lands or subject them
a inibus pellere aut gravissimis substituere tributis. Id etiam to very heavy tribute. Indeed, they were hastening to do this
ante ieri quam in consensum principes revocarentur ac- before the leading men could be reconciled with one an-
celerabant, huiusmodi dissidentia pecunias Galliarum sese other, for they reckoned that given the level of discord
asportaturos certissime rati. Quorum impetus Catillo prin- among them, the wealth of Gaul would surely be theirs for
cipe ferebatur. Principes, tanta barbarorum ignominia con- the taking. Their invasion was led by their chief, Catillus.
fecti, de pace habenda per legatos inter sese admodum quae- Overcome by the enormity of the disgrace caused by the
runt. nec diu morati, iure obsidum in unum consulturi barbarians, the leading men sought earnestly through the
conveniunt. In quo conventu, sapientium usi consilio, idem exchange of envoys to make peace. nor did they delay any
pacti, in concordiam maximam rediere, contumelias a bar- longer before they came together to deliberate under the
baris iniectas ultum ire parati. Et quia Karolus vix adhuc surety of hostages. During this meeting they heeded the ad-
triennis erat, de rege creando deliberant, non ut desertores, vice of wise men, and after pledging their faith to one an-
sed ut in adversarios indignantes. other, they returned to a state of complete harmony, ready
to avenge the insults inlicted on them by the barbarians.
And because Charles was barely three years old at the time,
they entered into deliberations to elect a king,14 not as trai-
tors, but as men indignant against their enemies.
S S
R R
L L
18 19
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 18 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 19 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 18 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 19 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM
histories book 1
5 5
Regis genus atque fortuna The Lineage and Fortunes of the King
rum militarem et strenuum, in basilica sancti14 . . . regem nal decree they made Odo, a vigorous warrior, their king.15
creant. Hic patrem habuit ex equestri ordine Rotbertum, His father, Robert,16 was of the knightly order, and his pa-
avum vero paternum Witichinum, advenam Germanum. ternal grandfather, Witichin, had emigrated from Ger-
Creatusque rex, strenue atque utiliter omnia gessit, preter many.17 After he was elected king, Odo carried out all of his
quod in militari tumultu raram componendi lites potesta- tasks energetically and successfully, except that when armed
tem habuit.15 nam pyratas signis collatis intra neustriam violence broke out, he had limited power to settle the dis-
septies fudit ac in fugam novies compulit.16 Atque hoc fere putes.18 Within neustria he defeated the pirates in pitched 888–892
per quinquennium.17 Quibus repulsis, fames valida subse- battles seven times and compelled them to lee nine times.
cuta est, cum triennio terra inculta remanserit. Iam enim This went on for about ive years. After the pirates had been
mensura frumenti quae sedeties ducta modium eficit de- driven out, there was a severe famine because the land had
cem dragmis venibat.18 Gallinatius quoque quatuor dragmis, remained uncultivated for three years. At that time one-
ovis vero tribus unciis, atque vacca iabo tollebatur. Vini nulla sixteenth of a bushel of grain sold for ten drachmas and a
coemptio erat, cum vinetis ubique succissis, vix eius aliquid chicken for four, while a sheep sold for three ounces and
habebatur. Rex interea per loca19 quae piratis irruentibus a cow could be purchased for eleven.19 Wine could not be
aditum prebebant munitiones exstruxit ac in eis militum co- bought because the vines had been cut down everywhere,
pias ponit, ipse20 in Aquitaniae partes secedens, non ante se and there was scarcely any to be had. Meanwhile the king
built fortiications throughout the areas that were serving
as entry points for the invading pirates, and he stationed
garrisons of soldiers there. He himself withdrew into Aqui-
S S
R R
L L
20 21
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 20 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 21 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 20 6/29/2011 8:16:12 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 21 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM
histories book 1
rediturum proponens quam supradicta modii frumentarii taine, declaring that he would not return until the afore-
mensura duabus dragmis veniret, gallinatius vero denario, mentioned bushel of grain sold for two drachmas, a chicken
atque ovis duabus itidem dragmis, vacca vero tribus unciis for a denarius,20 a sheep for two drachmas, and a cow for
venumdaretur. three ounces.
6 6
Aquitaniae concessisse22 dinoscunt. Conluunt itaque ac driven out of neustria learned that he had withdrawn into
classem parant, atque Brittanniam repentini irrumpunt. the interior of Aquitaine. And so they gathered together,
Brittanni repentino barbarorum impetu territi, saevientibus outitted a leet, and made a sudden incursion into Brittany.
cedunt.23 Cuique vitam tantum salvare satis fuit. Rerum sua- Terriied by the unexpected onset of the barbarians, the
rum ereptionem nemo quaerebat. De vita solummodo agi- Bretons led before the savage invaders. Each person
tabant. unde et suis fere omnibus derelictis, pyratae passim thought only of saving his own life. no one tried to rescue
rapiunt.24 Quaeque commoda asportant ac cum multa re- his possessions; their only concern was survival. As a result,
rum preda nullo renitente redeunt. Tam felici ergo successu almost all of their property was left abandoned, and the pi-
elati,25 per exteriores Brittanniae ines secus Andegavum rates plundered far and wide. They carried off everything of
Aquitaniam irrumpunt, multaque depopulatione terram de- value and returned with a great haul of plunder, without fac-
vastant. Abducunt viros ac mulieres puerosque. Quorum ing any opposition. Emboldened by such good fortune, they
burst through the outer borders of Brittany into Aquitaine,
S S
near Angers, and devastated the area with widespread pil-
R R
laging. They led away men, women, and children, and slaugh-
L L
22 23
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 22 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 23 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 22 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 23 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM
histories book 1
provectiores in utroque sexu obtruncant. Pueros servituti tered the more aged members of both sexes. They delivered
mancipant, feminas vero quae formosae videbantur prosti- the children into slavery and gave the most attractive
tuunt. women over to prostitution.
7 7
Odo rex contra pyratas exercitum parat Odo Musters an Army Against the Pirates
24 25
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 24 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 25 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 24 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 25 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM
histories book 1
belli dispositionem apud eos pertractabat, illos ad pugnam wavering in their counsel, he went over the plan of attack
hortans ac eorum magnanimitatem ex natura plurimum at- with them in detail, urging them into battle and repeatedly
tollens. Aliis quoque gentibus eos esse potiores tam viribus extolling their native courage. He declared that they were
quam audatia et armis memorabat. Eorum quoque maiores superior to other peoples not only in strength but also in
pene totum orbem debellasse, ipsumque caput orbis Ro- daring and skill at arms. Moreover, he reminded them that
mam immaniter attrivisse.26 unde et oportere paternam their ancestors had subjugated almost the whole of the earth
animositatem in iliis renovandam asserebat,27 ut patrum and had inlicted severe damage on the city of Rome, the
magnanimitas iliorum virtute commendaretur. very capital of the world. Hence they should revive this he-
reditary valor among themselves so that the courage of their
forefathers would be commended by the bravery of their
descendants.
8
8
Impetus Odonis regis in pyratas,
bellique qualitas Odo’s Assault on the Pirates and
the Outcome of the Battle 21
Q
A
uibus dictis cum persuasisset, utpote vir audax ac vio-
lentus, cum XVI signis illatis barbaros aggreditur.28 Sed fter persuading them with these words, in keeping with
peditum copias premittit29 atque ex eis primum impetum his daring and aggressive nature, Odo marched forward to
infert. Ipse cum equitatu succedens, peditum fortunam op- attack the barbarians with sixteen thousand troops. He sent
the foot soldiers ahead to make the irst assault, however,
while he followed up with the knights, waiting to see how
S S
R R
L L
26 27
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 26 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 27 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 26 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 27 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM
histories book 1
periebatur. nec minus et barbari acies ordinaverant ac indi- the infantry fared. The barbarians had also drawn up their
visi adversarios excipere cogitabant. At regii pedites hosti- battle lines, intending to meet their adversaries without
bus directi, primo certamine sagittas iaculantur; densatique, breaking their formation. The royal foot soldiers who had
lanceis obversis, in illos feruntur. Excepti vero a barbaris, been sent against the enemy ired arrows at the outset of the
plurimi dilabuntur, non tamen preter adversariorum rui- battle; then they crowded together in a group, turned their
nam. nam et eorum alii precipitati, alii vero quamplures spears toward their foes, and attacked. Many of them fell
sauciati sunt. Post pedites vero et regius equitatus succedit when they were met by the barbarians, but not without se-
ac acies hostium, copiis peditum divisas, multo nisu irrum- vere cost to their enemies; for some of them were struck
pit. Sternitque, ut fertur, XIII, paucis fuga salvatis.30 Et cum down and many more were wounded. The king’s knights
iam potiretur victoria spoliisque diripiendis instaret, barba- came up behind the foot troops and charged with tremen-
rorum IIII, quae insidiose in abditis latuerant, ex obliquo dous force into the enemy lines, which had already been
viarum irruere. Qui cum gradivo incessu propinquarent, ar- broken up by the infantry. Thirteen thousand of the enemy
morum luce ab observatoribus cogniti sunt. Factoque signo, are said to have been slain, and only a few managed to lee
exercitus in unum redit. Rex multo plures advenire arbitra- and save themselves. Just at the moment when the victory
tus, suos hortatur stipatores ut priores animos resumant, was theirs and they were setting about seizing the spoils of
immo et non amittant; decus pro patria mori, egregiumque their enemies, four thousand of the barbarians, who had
pro christianorum defensione corpora morti dare multis been lying in wait to ambush them, rushed out from side
sermonibus asserens. Exercitus itaque densatus, licet ante- paths. As they steadily drew nearer, however, the gleam of
rioris belli vulneribus aeger, tamen obvenire non distulit. their arms betrayed them to the lookouts. The signal was
given, and the army formed up again. The king reckoned
that many more of the enemy were on their way, and he
urged the men around him to summon up their former cour-
age and not to lose heart. He spoke to them at length, de-
claring that it was glorious for them to die for their country
and that it was a noble thing for them to sacriice them-
selves in the defense of Christians. And so the army formed
up in rank once more, and although they were still suffering
from the wounds they had received in the earlier engage-
ment, nonetheless they did not shrink from going to meet
S S the enemy.
R R
L L
28 29
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 28 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 29 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 28 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 29 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM
histories book 1
9 9
30 31
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 30 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 31 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 30 6/29/2011 8:16:13 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 31 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM
histories book 1
palantibus repertus atque captus est, suisque qui secum la- taken prisoner by some victorious soldiers who were rang-
tuerant gladio32 transixis, post spolia direpta Odoni regi33 ing widely over the ield of battle. They put his companions
oblatus est. who had hidden with him to the sword, and after seizing
spoils from them, they brought Catillus before King Odo.
10 10
32 33
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 32 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 33 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 32 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 33 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM
histories book 1
ante signifer, gladio educto, loetaliter eum transverberat ran him through, monstrously staining the sacred font with
ac fontem sacratum vulneris effusione immaniter cruentat. the outpouring of blood from the wound. The king was furi-
Rex tantum facinus indignans, principibus frementibus ho- ous at the perpetration of such a terrible crime and he or-
micidam rapi ac trucidari iubet. Ille gladio proiecto fugiens, dered the incensed magnates to seize the murderer and put
sancti Marcialis aram complexus est, indulgentiam ab rege him to death. Throwing away his sword, Ingo led and
ac primatibus postulans atque loquendi locum multis cla- grasped the altar of Saint Martial, beseeching the king and
moribus petens. Et iussu regio de commisso facinore re- his leading men for pardon and asking them with repeated
sponsurus sistitur. Orsusque sic ait:34 cries for an opportunity to speak. At the orders of the king
he was allowed to stand before them to answer for the crime
that he had committed, whereupon he addressed them as
follows:
11 11
‘D eum voluntatis meae conscium testor, nihil mihi “Iappeal to God, who is privy to my intentions, that
fuisse carius vestra salute. Vester amor ad hoc me impulit. nothing was dearer to me than your safety. It was love for
Ob vestram salutem in has me miserias precipitavi. Pro om- you that drove me to this. It was for your safety that I cast
nium vita tantum periculum subire non expavi. Grande qui- myself down into these misfortunes. It was for the sake of
dem est gestum negotium, sed maior est negotii utilitas. Re- all of your lives that I did not fear to run so great a risk. Cer-
tainly it is a serious crime that has been committed, but the
S S advantages to be derived from it are greater still. I do not
R R deny that I have offended against the sovereignty of the
L L
34 35
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 34 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 35 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 34 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 35 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM
histories book 1
giam maiestatem me laesisse quidem non abnuo, sed multa king, but I maintain that many beneits have been achieved
commoda in facinore comparata assero. Consideretur auc- through this crime. You must consider the intent of the
toris animus, animadvertatur etiam futura facinoris utilitas. agent and you must also take into account the future advan-
Tirannum captum metus causa baptismum petiisse adverti, tages that may result from the crime. I realized that it was
eumque postquam dimitteretur pluribus iniuriis vicem red- out of fear that the captured tyrant asked to be baptized,
diturum, suorumque stragem35 gravissime ulturum. In quem, and that when he was released he would requite the many
quia futurae cladis causa visus est, ferrum converti. Haec est wrongs done to him and exact the severest vengeance for
mei facinoris causa. Haec me ad scelus impulit. Hoc ob regis the slaughter of his men. I turned my sword against him be-
suorumque salutem peregi. Et utinam morte mea patriae li- cause I saw that he would be the cause of future calamity.
bertas rerumque tranquillitas consequantur. Sed si occidor, This was the reason for my crime. This is what drove me to
ob regis primatumque salutem occisus videbor. Cogitet iam such a wicked act. I did this for the salvation of the king and
quisque an pro huiusmodi mercede ei militandum sit, et an his men. And may my death bring about freedom for our fa-
pro ide servata tali habendus sit retributione. Ecce capitis therland, and peace!22 But if I am put to death, it will be
et pectoris laterisque recentia vulnera. Patent precedentium clear that I died in order to save the king and the leading
temporum cicatrices, dispersique per reliqua corporis mem- men. Let every man now ask himself if he is bound to serve
bra livores. Quorum assiduis doloribus confectus, nihil post the king in return for this sort of reward, and whether loyal
tot mala nisi mortem, malorum inem, exspecto.’ Qua con- ser vice merits such a punishment. Behold the fresh wounds
questione36 alios ad benivolentiam traxit, alios vero ad lacri- to my head, my chest, and my side! The scars of the past
mas impulit. unde et milites pro eo agentes regem demul- are plain to see. Bruises are spread over the remaining limbs
cent et ad pietatis clementiam suadent, nihil regi prodesse of my body. Debilitated by unceasing pains from these in-
asserentes si suorum quispiam intereat; immo in tiranni oc- juries, I look forward to nothing after so much suffering ex-
cisione gaudendum, vel quia vitae datus sit si idelis decessit, cept death, which is the end of suffering.” With this lament
vel quia eius insidiae penitus defecerint si in dolo baptis- he won the goodwill of some and drove others to tears. As
mum susceperit. Quibus rex animum temperans, tumulato a result, some of the king’s knights, acting on Ingo’s behalf,
barbaro, Ingonem in gratia resumit. Et insuper castrum tried to assuage their lord’s anger, urging him to be merci-
ful and show pity. They declared that the death of one of
his own men would be of no use to him. Instead he should
rejoice in the tyrant’s death, because if he had died a be-
liever, then he had been given over to life, whereas if he
S S had undergone baptism in bad faith, then his schemes had
R R come to nothing. In response the king tempered his anger,
L L
36 37
TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 36 06/29/11 TNT Job Number: 005520 • Author: DOML010 Page: 37 06/29/11
MS3
005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 36 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM 005520_DOML010_Book_APP.indb 37 6/29/2011 8:16:14 AM