1) Tibetans define reality as the three dimensions of space that make up the world of phenomena, rather than including time, which is a product of consciousness rather than an objective observation.
2) The essential nature of reality is not the world perceived by the senses, but rather "that which the object points to, the ground, the source, the ground of being."
3) When Tibetans speak of reality, they are referring to the world of phenomena, or rgyud, which means something that arises or is manifest. Reality cannot be directly spoken about but rather is something the world of phenomena is like.
1) Tibetans define reality as the three dimensions of space that make up the world of phenomena, rather than including time, which is a product of consciousness rather than an objective observation.
2) The essential nature of reality is not the world perceived by the senses, but rather "that which the object points to, the ground, the source, the ground of being."
3) When Tibetans speak of reality, they are referring to the world of phenomena, or rgyud, which means something that arises or is manifest. Reality cannot be directly spoken about but rather is something the world of phenomena is like.
1) Tibetans define reality as the three dimensions of space that make up the world of phenomena, rather than including time, which is a product of consciousness rather than an objective observation.
2) The essential nature of reality is not the world perceived by the senses, but rather "that which the object points to, the ground, the source, the ground of being."
3) When Tibetans speak of reality, they are referring to the world of phenomena, or rgyud, which means something that arises or is manifest. Reality cannot be directly spoken about but rather is something the world of phenomena is like.
What is called 'realism' is the way the mind begins to
become conscious of itself. It is a question of consciousness. —Joseph Campbell (Tibetan, 1952) Tibetans use the term "reality" to mean the three dimensions of space, and hence the world of phenomena. They do not speak of time. Time is not a matter of observation, but of the consciousness that observes, so it is irrelevant for the definition of reality, which is the world of space-time. This definition corresponds to Aristotle's conception of "to on", that is, that which is real, a thing by itself, in contrast to all that is unreal, appearances. The world of the senses does not correspond with the essential nature of reality. In fact, the essential nature of reality is not the world of the senses. The essential nature of reality is not an object, but that which the object points to, the ground, the source, the ground of being, the realm of being as it is in and of itself. That is the definition of reality that I have found in the sutras and in the literature. —Samyang Norbu ## What is Reality? In the West, we like to talk about reality. That is a problem. Because there is no reality. And yet, we like to talk about that, as if it was reality. But reality is not something that we speak about, but something that the world of phenomena is like. "Reality" is not something that we can understand by the mind, but something that the world of phenomena is like. Reality is not something that we can talk about, but something that the world of phenomena is like. We have a problem with the word "reality." When you ask a Tibetan what he means by the word "reality," he will respond, "It is not about appearances, it is not about sensations, it is not about the mind. Reality is about the phenomena." This is true, and so we have to study what the world of phenomena is like. What does it mean to say that something is like the world of phenomena? In Tibetan, when we talk about the world of phenomena, we are talking about reality. The first translation of reality is rgyud "phenomena." We say reality is rgyud rje. You cannot say "phenomena of phenomena," but you can say "reality of reality." The word rgyud "phenomena" is derived from the root rgyu "appearance" which means something that arises, something that comes up and is manifest. The word "phenomenon" is borrowed from the Latin. We need the word "phenomena" in order to talk about this world of phenomena. A Tibetan cannot talk about the idea of "the reality of the reality of reality." "The reality of the reality of the reality of reality." That sounds like a paradox. Yet, you might ask, if there is no reality, what is the real one? "The reality of the reality of the reality of reality." That sounds like a paradox. "The reality of the reality of the reality of reality." When we are trying to understand what is reality, we are not trying to talk about it, we are trying to talk about something that is like it, so that we can have some way of understanding reality. The essential nature of reality is that which the object is like. The essence of the world of phenomena is that which the object is like, the ground of being. The Tibetan does not speak of time; it is only when we are talking about the world of phenomena that we need to use the word "time." The essence of reality is the time-dimension as an appearance that is part of