Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.

: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: YASH
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 1

SPREADSHEET OF CANTILEVER R.C. RETAINING WALL AS PER IS CODES

Designs a RC Retaining Wall subjected to Normal Earth Pressure for the given properties of
backfill material, wall and base sections, Concrete grade and type of Steel.

INPUT
BACK FILL Angle of slope of bank Ф(deg) to horizontal, (max Ф=θ) 0
Angle of repose θ (deg) = 30
Density of back fill (kN/m3) = 18
Density of saturated back fill (kN/m3) = 20
Surcharge Uniform Surcharge load (kN/m2) = 1
Base Soil Safe Bearing Capacity of Soil (kN/m2) = 40
Coefficient of base friction between soil and concrete 0.45

RCDesignCD
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: UVW
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 2

INPUT (Cont'd)
Wall Height of Wall, H (m) 2.000
Profile Depth of Water Table below GL, H1 (m) 1.000
Depth of soil above toe slab, H2 (m) 0.000
Wall thickness at top of base slab, T1 (m) 0.400
Wall thickness at top, T2 (m) 0.400
Base slab width, B (m) 1.450
Base slab toe dimension, B1 (m) 1.050
Base slab thickness, D (m) 0.400
Shear key depth, D1 (m) 0.000
Shear key thickness, T3 (m) 0.000
Material Concrete Grade, fck M 30 4

Data Steel Reinforcement Grade, fy (N/mm2) = 5004

Concrete In base slab (mm) = 60

Cover In earth face of wall (mm) = 40
In front face of wall (mm) = 25

Horizontal Pressures, Moments and Shears on Wall (Service Load Condn.)

2
Depth of wall Horizontal Pressure on wall (kN/m ) Bending Moment Shear on
from top (m)Soil Pressure Grd Water Pr Surcharge Pr. on wall (kNm/m) wall (kN/m)
0 0.00 0 0.333 0.00 0.00
0.2 1.20 0 0.333 0.01 0.19
0.4 2.40 0 0.333 0.09 0.61
0.6 3.60 0 0.333 0.28 1.28
0.8 4.80 0 0.333 0.62 2.19
1 6.00 0 0.333 1.17 3.33
1.2 7.20 2 0.333 1.98 4.92
1.4 8.40 4 0.333 3.18 7.15
1.6 9.60 6 0.333 4.88 10.01
1.8 10.80 8 0.333 7.23 13.52
2 12.00 10 0.333 10.33 17.67
2.4 14.40 14 0.333 19.36 27.88
Value at 2.4m depth neglecting surcharge pressure = 18.40 27.08

Note: Seismic load case governs the design

RCDesignCD
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: UVW
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 3

Passive Resistance (Considered / Not Considered =) Tick TRUE

if considered
2
Passive pressure at top, (kN/m ) = 40.00
2
Passive pressure at bottom, (kN/m ) = 77.60
Depth of passive resistance (m) = 0.40
Passive Force (kN/m) = 23.52
Passive Moment about Toe (kNm/m) = -5.21

Vertical Loads per metre length (Service Load condition)

Load case Vertical load (kN) Lever arm to Toe (m) B.M. (kNm)
Wall (Rectangle) 20.000 1.250 25.000
Wall (Triangle) 0.000 1.050 0.000
Base Slab 14.500 0.725 10.513
Shear Key 0.000 0.000 0.000
Soil load over Toe Slab Tick TRUE
if considered 0.000 0.000 0.000
Soil +sub-soil water(if any) over Heel Slab 0.000 1.450 0.000
Surcharge load -1.11022E-16 1.450 0.000
Maximum Total = 34.500 - 35.513
Total neglecting surcharge load = 34.500 - 35.513
Total for 0.9 x (wall+base+soil over toe) & no surcharge = 31.050 - 31.961
C.G. of vertical loads from Toe: Case: Total load = 35.513/34.5= 1.029 m
Case: Total neglecting surcharge load = 35.513/34.5= 1.029 m
Moment on C.L. of Base:
Case: Total load = 19.357+(-5.205) + 34.5 x (0.725-1.029) = 3.652 kNm
Case: Total neglecting surcharge load = 19.357+(-5.205) + 34.5 x (0.725-1.029) = 3.652 kNm

Soil Pressure under Base Slab (Service Load Condition)

Case: Total load including soil load over toe slab Toe Heel
2
Pressure at Toe = 34.5/1.45 + ( 3.652) x 6 /1.45^2 = 34.215 kN/m
2
Pressure at Heel = 34.5/1.45 - ( 3.652) x 6 /1.45^2 = 13.371 kN/m
Case: Total including soil load over toe slab, but neglecting surcharge load: Soil Pressures O.K.
2
Pressure at Toe = 34.5/1.45 + ( 3.652) x 6 /1.45^2 = 34.215 kN/m
2
Pressure at Heel = 34.5/1.45 - ( 3.652) x 6 /1.45^2 = 13.371 kN/m

SBC of soil is more than the design pressures, hence base width is O.K
RCDesignCD
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: UVW
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 4
RCDesignCD

Stability Calculations (Service Load Condition)

Case: Total load including soil load over toe slab & Surchrage
Over Turning Moment about Toe = 19.36 kNm
Resisting Moment = 35.513 kNm
Factor of safety against over turning = 1.83 > 1.5, Section O.K.

Horizontal Sliding Force = 27.88 kN

Resisting Force = 34.5 x 0.45 + 23.52 = 39 kN
Factor of safety against sliding = 1.40 > 1.4, Section O.K.

Total for 0.9 x (wall+base+soil over toe) & no surcharge:

Over Turning Moment about Toe = 18.40 kNm
Resisting Moment = 31.961 kNm
Factor of safety against over turning = 1.74 > 1.5, Section O.K.

Horizontal Sliding Force = 27.08 kN

Resisting Force = 31.05 x 0.45 + 23.5237.5
= kN
Factor of safety against sliding = 1.38 < 1.4 Revise base size or consider soil load
over toe slab for which tick in cell E101
Design of Wall by Limit State Method (Partial Safety Factor, γf = 1.5)
Depth of wallUlt. MomentEff. Depth (mm) Bar ф (mm) Ast (mm2) Provide Steel near earth face
from top (m) Mu, kNm Reqd. Provided Vertl. Horzl. Reqd. Provided Vertical Reinf't Horizontal Reinf't
0 0 0 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
0.2 0.022 2.35 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
0.4 0.136 5.84 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
0.6 0.414 10.19 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
0.8 0.928 15.25 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
1 1.750 20.94 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
1.2 2.972 27.29 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
1.4 4.766 34.56 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
1.6 7.324 42.84 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
1.8 10.838 52.12 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
2 15.500 62.33 355 10 8 480 480 10 dia at 160 crs 8 dia - 100crs
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: UVW
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 5

Check for Shear in Wall by Limit State Method (Partial Safety Factor, γf = 1.5)
Depth of wall Ult. Shear Shear Stress 100 Ast Perm. Shear Stress Design Status
from top (m) Vu, kN τv, N/mm2 bd τc, N/mm2 of Wall
0 0.000 0.000 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
0.2 0.280 0.001 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
0.4 0.920 0.003 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
0.6 1.920 0.005 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
0.8 3.280 0.009 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
1 5.000 0.014 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
1.2 7.380 0.021 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
1.4 10.720 0.030 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
1.6 15.020 0.042 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
1.8 20.280 0.057 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.
2 26.500 0.075 0.135 0.280 Section O.K.

Design of Base Slab

Case: Total load including soil load over toe slab P Q R S

Toe Heel
Soil Pressure at P = 34.215 kN/m2
Soil Pressure at S = 13.371 kN/m2
Soil Pressure at Q = 19.121 kN/m2
Soil Pressure at R = 13.371 kN/m2

Designing the base slab by limit-state method, Partial load factor, γf = 1.5
Moment at Q = 1.5x(19.12x1.05^2/2 +15.09x1.05^2/3 -(0+1.05x0.4x25) x 1.05) = 15.86 kNm
Moment at R = 0.00 kNm
1.5x(13.37x-1.11022302462516E-16^2/2 +0x-1.11022302462516E-16^2/6-(0+0+-1.11022302462516E-16x0.4x 25

Case: Total including soil load over toe slab, but neglecting surcharge load:

Soil Pressure at P = 34.215 kN/m2

Soil Pressure at S = 13.371 kN/m2
Soil Pressure at Q = 19.121 kN/m2
Soil Pressure at R = 13.371 kN/m2 RCDesignCD
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: UVW
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 6
Designing the base slab by limit-state method, Partial load factor, γf = 1.5
Moment at Q = 1.5x(19.12x1.05^2/2+15.09x1.05^2/3-(0+1.05x0.4x25)x0.525)) = 15.86 kNm
Moment at R = 1.5x(13.37x-1.11022302462516E-16^2/2 +0x-1.11022302462516E-16^2/6-(0+-1.11022302462516E-16x
0.00 kNm

Areas of Reinforcement in Base Slab

Mu Eff. Depth(mm) Bar Ф (mm) Ast (mm2) Main steel Distribn.Steel
Location
(kNm) Reqd. Provided Main Distbn.Reqd. Provided Ф - Crs (mm) Ф - Crs (mm)
Toe Slab 15.86 63.05 334 12 12 480 480 12 - 235 at btm 12-235 at btm
Heel Slab 3E-31 0.00 334 12 12 480 485 12 - 230 at top 12-235 at top

Critical section
at 'd' from face

Check for Shear in Base Slab

P Q R S
Case: Total load including soil load over toe slab Toe Heel
2
Soil Pr. at 'd' from Q = 23.922 kN/m
2
Soil Pr. at 'd' from R = 8.570 kN/m
Ultimate Shear (Partial lad factor, γf = 1.5:
Shear at 'd' from Q = 1.5x(23.92x0.716+10.29x0.716/2 -(0x0.716/1.05+0.716x0.4x25)) = 20.480 kN
Shear at 'd' from R = 1.5x(13.37x-0.334+-4.8x-0.334/2-((0+0) x-0.334/-1.11022302462516E-16+-0.334x0.4x 25)) =
= 19.053 kN
Case: Total including soil load over toe slab, but neglecting surcharge load:

2
Soil Pr. at 'd' from Q = 23.922 kN/m
2
Soil Pr. at 'd' from R = 8.570 kN/m
Ultimate Shear (Partial lad factor, γf = 1.5:
Shear at 'd' from Q = 1.5x(23.92x0.716+10.29x0.716/2-(0x0.716/1.05+0.716x0.4x25)) = 20.48 kN
Shear at 'd' from R = kN =
18.55 25))
1.5x(13.37x-0.334+-4.8x-0.334/2-(0x-0.334/-1.11022302462516E-16+-0.334x0.4x

Check for Shear in Base Slab by Limit State Method (Partial Safety Factor, γf = 1.5)
Ult. Shear Shear Stress 100 Ast Perm. Shear Stress Design Status
Location 2 2
Vu-max, kN τv, N/mm bd τc, N/mm of Base
Toe Slab 20.480 0.061 0.144 0.288 Section O.K.
Heel Slab -18.552 -0.056 0.145 0.289 Section O.K.
RCDesignCD
Company's Name: PRASHANT HADKAR Job No.: 1896/03
DASARA CHOWK, KOLHAPUR Design by: YASH
Client: IRS Date: 5-Nov-15
Project: RCC UTILITY DUCT Page No. 7

Cantilever RC Retaining Wall

0 G.L.

GWT, -1

G.L., -2
-2 -2

-2.4 -2.4

Sectional Profile

RCDesignCD