Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CEP-Natural Language Processing
CEP-Natural Language Processing
The course is designed so that students will achieve the following PLOs:
Relevant Program Learning Outcomes (PLOs)
1 Engineering Knowledge: 7 Environment and Sustainability: ☐
2 Problem Analysis: 8 Ethics: ☐
3 Design/Development of Solutions: 9 Individual and Team Work: ☐
4 Investigation: 10 Communication: ☐
5 Modern Tool Usage: ☐ 11 Project Management: ☐
6 The Engineer and Society ☐ 12 Lifelong Learning: ☐
IMPORTANT INSTRUCTIONS:
Every student will submit his/her project in group and within due date.
All the projects submitted after the due date will be marked as zero.
Copied projects will be marked as zero.
HARDWARE REQUIREMENT:
SOFTWARE REQUIREMENT:
Windows 7 or higher
Google Chrome Browser
Python
Colab
Gmail account
PROJECT EVALUATION
Project Research Report
Viva of the Project.
Following characteristics of complex engineering problem are targeted in this Development/ Construction
assignment of Mobile Application Development course.
CEP STATEMENT:
Project Lifecycle:
Description
EVALUATION:
Students will be evaluated on the following criteria:
• Implementation: 70%
• Output/result achieved: 30%
OBJECTIVES OF CEP
Following are the objectives of the assigned complex engineering problem:
Sr CLO
Learning Outcomes Points
No. Involved
Develop Define and contrast deterministic and stochastic grammars,
1 CLO-3 providing examples to show the adequacy of each
4
SUMMARY:
Overall Summery of the project
Assessment of CEP (This Section is for Instructor’s use only)
Evaluation of CLO-1
Category Very Poor Poor Fair Good Excellent Obtained
Percentage [1-20%] [21-40%] [41-60%] [61-80%] [81-100%] Mark
Fully Fully
understand understand
Understanding of Developed
the problem the problem
the given understanding
Develops a but does not and
problem and its Unable to the of the given
partial understand understand 20% of
relationship with understan problem, but
understanding the the the Total
the given d the given unable to
of the given implication implications Assigned
situation/ problem corelated with
problem and and Marks
application/ the assigned
relationship relationship
scenario application
with the with the
application. application.
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.10 0.11-0.20 0.21-0.30 0.31-0.40 0.41-0.50
Obtained Marks
Selection of an
Selected an Selected
appropriate Selected
appropriate Selected an correct
method/ Wrong correct
method but appropriate method and
approach and its method method and 50% of
developed method and approach
implementation selected to approach the Total
wrong approach but also able to
to solve the given solve the also able to Assigned
approach unable to implement
problem with problem implement Marks
towards the implement and execute
respect to the partially
solution correctly
application
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.20 0.21-0.40 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00
Obtained Marks
Achieved
Achieved Achieved
Results of the Achieved Results and
partial results correct
proposed Unable to some results provided an 30% of
and provided a results and
solution against achieve but unable to acceptable the Total
partial solved the
the given any results solve the solution to Assigned
solution to the given
problem problem the given Marks
problem problem
problem
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.10 0.11-0.20 0.21-0.30 0.31-0.40 0.41-0.50
Obtained Marks
Instructor’s
Date Total Obtained Marks
Signature
Evaluation of CLO-2
Category Very Poor Poor Fair Good Excellent Obtained
Percentage [1-20%] [21-40%] [41-60%] [61-80%] [81-100%] Mark
Fully Fully
understand understand
Understanding of Developed
the problem the problem
the given understanding
Develops a but does not and
problem and its Unable to the of the given
partial understand understand 20% of
relationship with understan problem, but
understanding the the the Total
the given d the given unable to
of the given implication implications Assigned
situation/ problem corelated with
problem and and Marks
application/ the assigned
relationship relationship
scenario application
with the with the
application. application.
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.20 0.21-0.40 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00
Obtained Marks
Selection of an
Selected an Selected
appropriate Selected
appropriate Selected an correct
method/ Wrong correct
method but appropriate method and
approach and its method method and 50% of
developed method and approach
implementation selected to approach the Total
wrong approach but also able to
to solve the given solve the also able to Assigned
approach unable to implement
problem with problem implement Marks
towards the implement and execute
respect to the partially
solution correctly
application
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.20 0.21-0.40 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00
Obtained Marks
Achieved
Achieved Achieved
Results of the Achieved Results and
partial results correct
proposed Unable to some results provided an 30% of
and provided a results and
solution against achieve but unable to acceptable the Total
partial solved the
the given any results solve the solution to Assigned
solution to the given
problem problem the given Marks
problem problem
problem
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.20 0.21-0.40 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00
Obtained Marks
Instructor’s
Date Total Obtained Marks
Signature
Evaluation of CLO-3
Category Very Poor Poor Fair Good Excellent Obtained
Percentage [1-20%] [21-40%] [41-60%] [61-80%] [81-100%] Mark
Fully Fully
understand understand
Understanding of Developed
the problem the problem
the given understanding
Develops a but does not and
problem and its Unable to the of the given
partial understand understand 20% of
relationship with understan problem, but
understanding the the the Total
the given d the given unable to
of the given implication implications Assigned
situation/ problem corelated with
problem and and Marks
application/ the assigned
relationship relationship
scenario application
with the with the
application. application.
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.20 0.21-0.40 0.41-0.60 0.61-0.80 0.81-1.00
Obtained Marks
Selection of an
Selected an Selected
appropriate Selected
appropriate Selected an correct
method/ Wrong correct
method but appropriate method and
approach and its method method and 50% of
developed method and approach
implementation selected to approach the Total
wrong approach but also able to
to solve the given solve the also able to Assigned
approach unable to implement
problem with problem implement Marks
towards the implement and execute
respect to the partially
solution correctly
application
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.60 0.61-1.20 1.21-1.80 1.81-2.40 2.41-3.00
Obtained Marks
Achieved
Achieved Achieved
Results of the Achieved Results and
partial results correct
proposed Unable to some results provided an 30% of
and provided a results and
solution against achieve but unable to acceptable the Total
partial solved the
the given any results solve the solution to Assigned
solution to the given
problem problem the given Marks
problem problem
problem
Assigned Marks 0.01-0.40 0.41-0.80 0.81-1.20 1.21-1.60 1.61-2.00
Obtained Marks
Instructor’s
Date Total Obtained Marks
Signature
PROPOSED SOLUTION COMPLEX ENGINEERING PROBLEM
Solution of Objective 1 (CLO-1)
The student will propose this solution for the given objectives here.
Solution of Objective 2 (CLO-2)
The student will propose this solution for the given objectives here.
Solution of Objective 3 (CLO-3)
The student will propose this solution for the given objectives here.
Solution of Objective 4 (CLO-3)
The student will propose this solution for the given objectives here.
Cost Calculations
The student will tabulate all costs involve to design the project for real scale implementation.