This document appears to be a school evaluation report that assesses the school's curriculum and instruction. It contains two sections that are rated on a scale from 0-3. The first section examines whether the curriculum provides for the development needs of all learners in the school community. A high rating indicates that educational needs are being fully met and intrinsic motivation is promoted. The second section evaluates whether the implemented curriculum is localized to make learning more meaningful and applicable to life in the community. A high rating suggests the localized curriculum is implemented and monitored to enhance meaningful and pleasurable learning.
Original Description:
Page 4
Original Title
Pages from SELF-ASSESSMENT-TOOL-TEMPLATE-PORTRAIT (1)-4
This document appears to be a school evaluation report that assesses the school's curriculum and instruction. It contains two sections that are rated on a scale from 0-3. The first section examines whether the curriculum provides for the development needs of all learners in the school community. A high rating indicates that educational needs are being fully met and intrinsic motivation is promoted. The second section evaluates whether the implemented curriculum is localized to make learning more meaningful and applicable to life in the community. A high rating suggests the localized curriculum is implemented and monitored to enhance meaningful and pleasurable learning.
This document appears to be a school evaluation report that assesses the school's curriculum and instruction. It contains two sections that are rated on a scale from 0-3. The first section examines whether the curriculum provides for the development needs of all learners in the school community. A high rating indicates that educational needs are being fully met and intrinsic motivation is promoted. The second section evaluates whether the implemented curriculum is localized to make learning more meaningful and applicable to life in the community. A high rating suggests the localized curriculum is implemented and monitored to enhance meaningful and pleasurable learning.
NAME OF SCHOOL ________________________________________________________________
NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD ________________________________________________________________
CLUSTER _____________________ DISTRICT _________________________________________
PREVIOUS RATING _______________ DATE OF VALIDATION ______________________________
II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION (30)
The curriculum learning systems anchored on the community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are collaboratively developed and continuously improved. SELF SDO INDICATOR STANDARD MOVs LEVEL OF PRACTICE RATING RATING 1. The curriculum 1. Teacher’s Portfolio LEVEL 0: Not Evident provides for the Attachments: development needs of ▪ RPMS/IPCRF portfolio LEVEL 1 Indicator: All types of - Proportion of teachers learners of the school community all types of learners in meeting PPST career stage 3 in are identified, their learning the school community all domains curves assessed; appropriate (Highly Proficient) programs with its support ▪ Monthly Supervisory materials for each type of learner Plan is developed with 26-50 percent ▪ Classroom Observation decrease of the non-numerates Tool, Observation Notes, Class Program, Sample and non-literate. Lesson Plan ▪ DepEd e-mails and FB LEVEL 2 Indicator: Programs accounts are 100% implemented and ▪ School Leadership with closely monitored to address Designation performances discrepancies, ▪ List of benchmark best practices, coach Localized/Contextualize low performers, mentor potential d IMs with sample (Big leaders, reward high achievement, Books, MTB dictionary and maintain environment that etc.) makes learning meaningful and ▪ School Initiated SLM/LAS (sample) enjoyable with 51-75 decrease of ▪ School Forms non-numerates and non-literates. ▪ Improvised/Localized LMs/ IMs/DLL LEVEL 3 Indicator: These ▪ List of instructional educational needs of all types of materials learners are being met as shown ▪ List of Visual Aids, by continuous improvement on Digitized IMs and learning outcomes (see the table Quality Assured and under the MOVs and products of accepted Localized LMs learning. Teachers’ as well as students’ 2. Training Development Plan performance is motivated by Attachments: intrinsic rather than extrinsic ▪ Teacher’ s rewards. Developmental Needs The schools’ differentiated ▪ LAC/INSETs Implementation Plan programs are frequently (LAC template as per benchmarked by other schools. DepEd/Division 2. The implemented Memorandum LEVEL 0: Not Evident curriculum is localized Issuances) ▪ Project Proposal LEVEL 1 Indicator: Local beliefs, to make it more ▪ School Memorandum norms, values, traditions, meaningful to the ▪ Technical Working folklores, current events, and learners and applicable Group existing technologies are to life in the ▪ Activity Completion documented and used to develop community. Report which includes a lasting curriculum. training details, Localization guidelines are agreed attendance, pictures financial and monitoring to by school community and report) teachers are properly oriented. ▪ Sample Certificate and Developed localized curriculum in Program 4 learning areas. ▪ Technical Assistance Plan (based on LEVEL 2 Indicator: The localized DepEd/Division curriculum is implemented and Memorandum monitored closely to ensure that it Issuances) makes learning more meaningful and pleasurable, produces desired