Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

NAME OF SCHOOL ________________________________________________________________

NAME OF SCHOOL HEAD ________________________________________________________________

CLUSTER _____________________ DISTRICT _________________________________________

PREVIOUS RATING _______________ DATE OF VALIDATION ______________________________

II. CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION (30)


The curriculum learning systems anchored on the community and learner’s contexts and aspirations are
collaboratively developed and continuously improved.
SELF SDO
INDICATOR STANDARD MOVs LEVEL OF PRACTICE
RATING RATING
1. The curriculum 1. Teacher’s Portfolio LEVEL 0: Not Evident
provides for the Attachments:
development needs of ▪ RPMS/IPCRF portfolio LEVEL 1 Indicator: All types of
- Proportion of teachers learners of the school community
all types of learners in
meeting PPST career stage 3 in are identified, their learning
the school community all domains curves assessed; appropriate
(Highly Proficient) programs with its support
▪ Monthly Supervisory materials for each type of learner
Plan
is developed with 26-50 percent
▪ Classroom Observation
decrease of the non-numerates
Tool, Observation Notes,
Class Program, Sample and non-literate.
Lesson Plan
▪ DepEd e-mails and FB LEVEL 2 Indicator: Programs
accounts are 100% implemented and
▪ School Leadership with closely monitored to address
Designation performances discrepancies,
▪ List of benchmark best practices, coach
Localized/Contextualize low performers, mentor potential
d IMs with sample (Big leaders, reward high achievement,
Books, MTB dictionary
and maintain environment that
etc.)
makes learning meaningful and
▪ School Initiated
SLM/LAS (sample) enjoyable with 51-75 decrease of
▪ School Forms non-numerates and non-literates.
▪ Improvised/Localized
LMs/ IMs/DLL LEVEL 3 Indicator: These
▪ List of instructional educational needs of all types of
materials learners are being met as shown
▪ List of Visual Aids, by continuous improvement on
Digitized IMs and learning outcomes (see the table
Quality Assured and under the MOVs and products of
accepted Localized LMs
learning.
Teachers’ as well as students’
2. Training Development Plan
performance is motivated by
Attachments:
intrinsic rather than extrinsic
▪ Teacher’ s
rewards.
Developmental Needs
The schools’ differentiated
▪ LAC/INSETs
Implementation Plan programs are frequently
(LAC template as per benchmarked by other schools.
DepEd/Division
2. The implemented Memorandum LEVEL 0: Not Evident
curriculum is localized Issuances)
▪ Project Proposal LEVEL 1 Indicator: Local beliefs,
to make it more
▪ School Memorandum norms, values, traditions,
meaningful to the ▪ Technical Working folklores, current events, and
learners and applicable Group existing technologies are
to life in the ▪ Activity Completion documented and used to develop
community. Report which includes
a lasting curriculum.
training details,
Localization guidelines are agreed
attendance, pictures
financial and monitoring to by school community and
report) teachers are properly oriented.
▪ Sample Certificate and Developed localized curriculum in
Program 4 learning areas.
▪ Technical Assistance
Plan (based on LEVEL 2 Indicator: The localized
DepEd/Division curriculum is implemented and
Memorandum monitored closely to ensure that it
Issuances) makes learning more meaningful
and pleasurable, produces desired

You might also like