Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Duterte's Four Years in Power - Extrajudicial Killings, Rights Abuses and Terror Polsci
Duterte's Four Years in Power - Extrajudicial Killings, Rights Abuses and Terror Polsci
Duterte's Four Years in Power - Extrajudicial Killings, Rights Abuses and Terror Polsci
Section:1
Semester: 2 (2021/2022)
1. Summary of the news
included in a review of President Rodrigo Duterte's fourth year in office. The passage of a
controversial anti-terrorism bill and a botched reaction to the coronavirus outbreak were also
mentioned in the review. In a mix of police operations and vigilante killings, more than
27,000 accused drug peddlers have been killed since 2016. Nearly 250 human rights
defenders have also been killed, including unions, attorneys, journalists, and environmental
activists by using coercive power that they have. President Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines
has signed a contentious anti-terror bill into law, which critics worry may be used to further
suppress dissent.
The law has been heavily criticized for its vague definition of terrorism and the broad
powers it grants security services. "It's as though the Philippines is always in a state worse
than martial law," former Supreme Court Justice Antonio Carpio stated. The Philippine
government has been criticized for employing militarized approach with their entitlement of
position of power that they have to deal with a public health emergency. In the Southeast
Asian region, the country at that time has the largest number of COVID-19 infections.
Lockdown regulations have forced the closure of enterprises and wreaked havoc on the
economy, resulting in the unemployment of an estimated 7.3 million people. However, Harry
Roque added that the problem was the epidemic only although known by everyone that it is
1
2. Opinion on the article
It is often argued that, leaders in any sort of country do know what are the best
solution under their territorial governance as it associates with something that most other
people outside the place of their governance can’t comprehend properly as it driven by the
matter of sociocultural that only the people living there understand how are they living their
life. However, it is still distinguishable whether it is an act for the people or an act for
Based on the article, I am strongly disagreeing with the behaviors and the policies of
the government that been practiced. Because by the way of Duterte practicing the policy in
the country, there is likely for the country will be led to the governance of dictatorship in that
country as the people don’t have their voice to be listened. Based on a paper that been written
repression. Dictators rule by commands and prohibitions.1 The police monitor compliance
and there are sanctions for disobedience. This statement does correlate with the way of how
Duterte govern Philippines by silencing the people’s dissent in a harsh way which is death
penalty. Although they are entitled with the coercive power, it is unreasonable for acting such
way.
Moreover, Duterte also practicing one of the types of power which is persuasion. This
is quite dangerous as persuasion have the capability of reaching within and also across a wide
set of diverse populations to change a social or cultural system.2 And the persuasion that been
people regarding the vague definition of terrorism in his bill that been implemented to the law
that the wide powers give security forces to arrest suspected terrorists without a warrant and
1
Wintrobe, Ronald. (2009). Dictatorship: Analytical Approaches. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative
Politics.
2
Heotis, Effie. (2017). Leadership and the Art of Social Persuasion. SOJ Psychology. 4. 2.
2
detain them without charges for a longer period of time for him to arrest people who’s not on
the road of decision as him. Truth is, Duterte is the actual “terrorist” as he was terrorising the
people understanding and rights as the people have the probability of being charged with the
3
3. View from the Islamic perspective
Islam concerned pertaining the importance of governing a territory with the value of
O you who have believed, do not betray Allah and the Messenger or betray your trusts while
you know [the consequence].3
Nowadays, we can see there are many countries that are suffered from various aspects of
problem due to corrupt leaders and fraud way of ruling. Thus, people are required to choose a
responsible leader in order to ensure the future and rights of its people are in the safe hand.
As from what can be interpreted from the article, Duterte indeed exploit the ability for
its people to speak out by implementing a bill that making dissents as a crime. Islam does not
forbid the speech and expression as long as it does not violate the Quran and al-Hadith, thus,
each individual is allowed to submit their opinions for the benefit of all mankind. Rasulullah
S.A.W said:
Hadith above stated the importance of everyone's right to express themselves in areas of
rights. However, every individual or group, as well as leaders involved in the right to freedom
of expression, should adhere to the limits of freedom of speech from having the element of
insulting. This is to avoid any detrimental consequences for individuals and the community as
a whole.
3
Surah Al-Anfal, Verse 27
4
Hadith No 2191, Narrated by Ibn Majah
4
Moreover, regarding the Duterte’s controversial act that he proposed a vague bill in
order to protect their power from any that are against him. There is a verse in Al-Quran:
This verse of Al-Quran emphasised on the matter of abusive of power as what Duterte is
practicing are strictly prohibited that really need to be avoided by any leader that been given
5
Surah Al-Anfal, Verse 90
5
4. Conclusion
Corruption is most widespread in places where there are other forms of institutional
weakness, such as political instability, bureaucratic red tape, and weakened legislative and
judicial systems as the incident that happened in Philippine. The crucial aspect to remember
is that corruption and institutional flaws are inextricably intertwined, and that they mutually
reinforce one another. For example, red tape facilitates corruption, and corrupt officials may
work to increase the extent of red tape in order to collect more bribes from the public. And it
is clearly shown that Duterte govern the country based on his whims and fancies that full with
corruption to the point of contradicting to the provisions of Al-Quran and Sunnah and even
the normal intuition of human being can value it to be inhuman. There is also a Hadith
emphasizing the honesty on leadership; “No Imam or authority spends the dark of night being
deceptive in his jurisdiction but that Allah will forbid him from entering Paradise”.6 Thus,
every people must take the incident as a moral to be used in order to preserve the peace of
6
Tārīkh Dimashq 38523
6
Bibliography