Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Onodera 2006
Onodera 2006
ABSTRACT: A variety of problems involving the masticatory system can be partially attributed to para-
functional habits such as bruxism. These include occlusal trauma, abfractions, tooth migration, as well
0886-9634/2404- as temporomandibular dysfunction. Since bruxism is considered a contributing factor to the above-men-
292$05.00/0, THE
JOURNAL OF tioned dental problems, it is essential to consider parafunctional habits in the diagnosis and treatment
CRANIOMANDIBULAR planning before doing any occlusal reconstruction. However, the problem lies in the lack or absence of
PRACTICE,
Copyright © 2006 a simple device or gauge useful to be able to diagnose and evaluate the occlusal schemes in the
by CHROMA, Inc. patient’s grinding pattern. In this study, we have developed a very simple device (BruxChecker) for eval-
uating the grinding patterns in sleep bruxism. Using the BruxChecker, it was possible to visualize real or
Manuscript received
December 13, 2004;
actual interferences during sleep bruxism. Therefore, examination of the grinding pattern using this
revised device is necessary and crucial for making the proper treatment plan for each patient.
manuscript received
June 27, 2006; accepted
June 30, 2006
Address for reprint
requests:
Dr. Sadao Sato
Department of Craniofacial
Growth and Development
Dentistry
Kanagawa Dental College
82 Inaoka-Cho, Yokosuka,
B
Kanagawa, Japan ruxism is generally defined as a diurnal or noctur-
E-mail: satos@kdcnet.ac.jp
nal parafunctional activity involving: clenching,
grinding, bracing and gnashing of the teeth. 1
During bruxism, excessive forces can be generated for
extended periods of time that exceed the approximately
20-minute tooth contact. Some literature even reported a
case of bruxism involving more than two hours of tooth
contact.2 Sleep bruxism can generate tremendous biome-
Dr. Kanji Onodera received his D.D.S. chanical occlusal forces, which at times can be signifi-
from Tokyo Dental College in 1995 and cantly greater than bruxing with conscious effort by an
had a clinical practice in the Department
of Conservative Dentistry at the same
individual during the waking hours.3-5 As a result, signif-
school from 1996-1999. He received a icant load can be distributed to the dentition, the alveolar
certificate in orthodontics in 2001 from and periodontal supporting structures, and the temporo-
Kanagawa Dental College. His major
research interest is the interrelation of
mandibular (TM) joints. Simultaneously, hyperactivity of
craniomandibular dysfunction with masticatory muscles occurs, thus compromising the
bruxism. health of these muscles.
Several types of degenerative occlusal conditions such
as occlusal trauma, abfractions, dental compression syn-
dromes, tooth migration, as well as temporomandibular
dysfunction have long been described in dentistry.
Stresses from active bruxism appear to cause a physical
or physiochemical loss of cervical tooth structure and
may result in dentin hypersensitivity in these regions due
to the progressive exposure of dentinal tubules.6 A high
292
ONODERA ET AL. EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP
OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE 293
EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP ONODERA ET AL.
Figure 2
Effect of subject wearing the
BruxChecker on the masticatory
muscle activity. No significant differ-
ence between the activity of the mas-
seter and temporalis muscles with and
without wearing the BruxChecker was
noted.
294 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4
ONODERA ET AL. EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP
Figure 3
b
c. canine-premolar-molar grinding
(group grinding, GG) without mediotru-
sion grinding; and
d. canine-premolar-molar grinding
(group grinding) with mediotrusion
grinding (GG+MG).
Figure 4
Observation of different grinding patterns on
the BruxChecker: a. incisor-canine-premolar
grinding (right side) with mediotrusive grinding
(lingual cusps of 1st and 2nd molar on the left
side); b. canine-premolar grinding (right side)
with mediotrusion grinding in 1st molar (left
side) and incisor-canine-premolar grinding
without mediotrusion grinding; c. no anterior-
canine grinding with strong posterior grinding;
d. faint anterior-canine grinding with strong
posterior grinding.
OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE 295
EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP ONODERA ET AL.
296 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4
ONODERA ET AL. EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP
Table 1
Patterns of Tooth Contact Evaluated on the Articulator or BruxChecker in
No-TMJ Symptom and TMJ Symptomatic Subjects
No-TMJ symptomatic TMJ symptomatic
subjects (n=36) subjects (n=50)
Articulator BruxChecker Articulator BruxChecker
Laterotrusion side
Incisor-canine 16 (44.4) 11 (30.6) 8 (16.0)* 2 (4.0)*
Incisor-canine-premolar 9 (25.0) 14 (38.9) 15 (30.0) 2 (4.0)*
Incisor-canine-premolar-molar 10 (27.8) 11 (30.6) 26 (52.0)* 43 (94.0)*
No-laterotrusion contact 1 (0.03) 0 1 (2.0) 0
Mediotrusion side
Mediotrusion contact† 21 (58.3) 13 (36.1) 28 (56.0) 8 (16.0)*
Mediotrusion grinding‡ 2 (0.06) 23 (63.9) 5 (10.0) 42 (84.0)*
No-mediotrusion contact 13 (36.1) 0 17 (34.0) 0
*Significantly different from No-TMJ symptom group at p<0.05
†Contact: defined as a cusp contact during mediotrusive movement of the condyle
‡Grinding: defined as a wider and expanded facet around the cusp and oblique surface of the cusp than the cusp contact
(): Percent
described previously with grinding facets on the lingual sive side during sleep bruxism.
cusps of the mediotrusive side, mainly first and second Group Grinding with Mediotrusive Grinding
molars. (GG+MG): Laterotrusive group guidance up to the molars
Group Grinding (GG): The canine tooth up to the with signs of grinding facets in the lingual cusps of the
molars on the laterotrusive side are ground off as a group 1st and 2nd molars on the mediotrusive side.
with no signs of grinding in the molars on the mediotru-
Figure 7
The occlusion scheme based on bruxism
grinding patttern: a. canine-dominated
grinding; b. canine-dominated grinding
with mediotrusion grinding; c. group grind-
ing; d. group grinding with mediotrusion
grinding.
OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE 297
EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP ONODERA ET AL.
298 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4
ONODERA ET AL. EVALUATION OF GRINDING PATTERNS DURING SLEEP
OCTOBER 2006, VOL. 24, NO. 4 THE JOURNAL OF CRANIOMANDIBULAR PRACTICE 299