Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

RA-2223758 SIMOPS - Cargo operation and SIRE inspection

Vessel: Front Duke Risk assessment group List of participants (one on each row):
Approved by:
Date: 2022-07-16 Deck Deck officers & Crew
HSEQ Singapore
Engine officers & Crew

The highest level in the risk assessment is highlighted in below table


Description of task RISK CATEGORY RISK VALUE ACTION
Vetting during cargo operation
Negligible 1-2 Evaluation at Operational level Onboard.

Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment


Minor 3-4 Evaluation at Senior Operational level Onboard.
Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment

Moderate 5 - 10 Evaluation at Senior Operational level Ashore (Vessel Manager –Marine


Superintendent/Manager).
Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment
Major 12 - 16 Evaluation at Management level Ashore (Fleet Director- Fleet Manager –DPA -
HSEQ Manager)

Acceptable to proceed with work as per mitigation plan in Risk Assessment


Extreme Risk 20 - 25 Evaluation at Top Management level Ashore (Managing Director - CEO)
Not Acceptable Risk. Work Cannot Proceed.

HAZARD CONSEQUENCE 1ST ASSESSMENT MITIGATING ACTIONS 2ND ASSESSMENT

1 Inadequate Planning Stress, Confusion 9 Severity 3 1- Conducted meeting of all department heads to plan all jobs. 2 Severity 1
Likelihood 3 2- Advise office for intended plan of action Likelihood 2
4- Opening meeting with SIRE inspector.
5- Assign individual duties and brief about same.
6- Terminal permission for Testing of Alarms & equipment.
2 Working Overtime / Long hours Fatigue , Stress 6 Severity 2 1- Use WRH to plan work & Rest hours. 2 Severity 1
Likelihood 3 2- Inspection to be planned in such a way that duty officers complete Likelihood 2
their inspection in working time.
3- There should be enough crew members to complete each tasks and
supervise them.
3 Distraction During Cargo operation Stress , Confusion , increased Workload 6 Severity 2 1- Pre job tool box meeting. 2 Severity 1
and Inspection , Injury , Pollution Likelihood 3 2- Individual duties assigned & Briefed. Likelihood 2
3- Co-ordination among teams.- Establish clear lines of communication.
4. CCR inspection not to be carried out during Critical stages of
operation.

Page 1 of 2
4 Communication Confusion , Lack of communication 6 Severity 2 1- Ensure effective means of communication is established. 2 Severity 1
Likelihood 3 2- Ensure enough walkie talkie to complete all tasks Likelihood 2
3- Master Office ,CCR or ECR to be control station for managing
between the operations.
4- Contingency measures to be agreed during tool box meeting.
5- Terminal to be advised for Testing of alarms / equipment.

RA-2223758 SIMOPS - Cargo operation and SIRE inspection approved by


HSEQ Singapore

____________________________________________
Signature

Page 2 of 2

You might also like