Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Differentiation Levels of
Differentiation Levels of
Differentiation Levels of
Revised 02/04/13
Accepted 02/11/13
DOI: 10.1002/j.2161-0045.2014.00071.x
Differentiation Levels of
College Students: Effects on
Vocational Identity and
Career Decision Making
Patrick Johnson, Tamara D. Schamuhn,
Danielle B. Nelson, and Walter C. Buboltz Jr.
This study assessed the effects of differentiation levels on the career development
of college students. Participants were 231 college students who completed the
Differentiation of Self Inventory (Skowron & Friedlander, 1998), My Vocational
Situation (Holland, Daiger, & Power, 1980), the Career Decision Profile (CDP;
Jones & Lohmann, 1998), and demographic questions. The results supported the
hypotheses that higher levels of the various components of differentiation would
predict higher levels of vocational identity and fewer difficulties with career decision
making. In particular, lower levels of emotional cutoff and emotional reactivity and
higher levels of “I position” predicted higher levels of vocational identity and career
decision making. Results suggest a more complicated picture for fusion, with higher
levels being predictive of lower levels of decisiveness but not significantly related to
vocational identity. Implications of the results for career counselors are provided.
Method
Procedure and Participants
Participants were 231 college student volunteers who, after providing
written consent, completed standardized instruments and demographic
questions. Of these 231 participants, 140 (61%) were women, 88 (38%)
were men, and three (1%) did not identify their gender. In terms of
ethnicity, 35 (15%) identified themselves as African American, two (1%)
identified themselves as Asian American, 185 (80%) identified themselves
as Caucasian/Anglo American, three (1%) identified themselves as His-
panic/Latino American, and six (3%) identified themselves as other. The
mean age of the participants was 22.85 years old (SD = 5.93).
Instruments
Differentiation of Self Inventory (DSI). The DSI (Skowron & Friedlander,
1998) is composed of 43 items, rated on a 6-point scale, that generate
a total differentiation score and four subscale scores. Factor analyses
demonstrated support for the four subscales as being “empirically dis-
tinct dimensions of a single construct, differentiation of self” (Skowron
& Friedlander, 1998, p. 241). The first subscale, Emotional Reactivity,
reflects the degree to which a person responds to environmental stimuli
with emotional flooding, emotional liability, or hypersensitivity. The
second subscale, I Position, reflects a clearly defined sense of self and
the ability to thoughtfully adhere to one’s convictions when pressured
to do otherwise. The third subscale, Emotional Cutoff, reflects feeling
threatened by intimacy and feeling excessive vulnerability in relationships
with others; this vulnerability leads to fears of engulfment and defensive
behaviors such as distancing and denial. The fourth subscale, Fusion
With Others, reflects emotional overinvolvement with others, including
triangulation and overidentification with parents. Higher scores on the
DSI reflect higher levels of differentiation (i.e., more total differentia-
tion, less fusion, less reactivity, less cutoff, more I position).
Skowron and Friedlander (1998) provided information about the psy-
chometric properties of the DSI based on three separate studies. Across
the three studies, participants were 609 adults, of which 75% were women.
In terms of ethnicity of the total sample, approximately 5% were African
American, 3% were Asian American, 88% were Caucasian/Anglo Ameri-
can, 2% were Hispanic/Latino American, and 2% were Native American.
Initial construct validity of the DSI was supported as the DSI correlated
highly and in the expected direction with a measure of chronic anxiety and
with amount and intensity of symptomatic distress. Across several stud-
ies, internal consistency coefficients, using Cronbach’s alpha, supported
Results
For our study, the alpha coefficients for the scales were as follows: DSI
= .75, Emotional Reactivity = .67, Emotional Cutoff = .83, Fusion With
Others = .50, I Position = .75, VI = .89, Decidedness = .74, Comfort =
.79, Self-Clarity = .80, Knowledge = .77, Decisiveness = .86, and Career
74 The Career Development Quarterly MARCH 2014 • Volume 62
Discussion
Our study suggests a link between differentiation of self and young
adult career development. Specifically, higher levels of differentiation
predict higher levels of vocational identity and higher levels of all six of
Table 1
Descriptive Statistics and Study Variable Intercorrelations
Item M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
1. ER 37.75 10.14 —
2. IP 46.55 9.08 .42* —
3. EC 54.16 10.66 .16* .15* —
4. FO 24.84 8.63 .27* –.05 –.26* —
5. VI 12.11 6.10 .27* .25* .21* .04 —
6. Dec 13.80 3.04 .08 .24* .20* –.09 .48* —
7. Com 12.33 3.64 .20* .29* .18* .01 .56* .60* —
8. SC 12.68 6.98 .03 –.01 .02 .14* .14* .14* .11 —
9. Know 15.34 6.22 .11 .14* .23* .04 .46* .40* .47* .00 —
10. Deci 16.22 6.33 .33* .25* .14* .20* .25* .15* .34* .11 .19* —
11. CCI 20.08 3.91 .08 .08 .10 .02 .11 .19* .21* .04 .04 .04 —
Note. ER = emotional reactivity; IP = I position; EC = emotional cutoff; FO = fusion with others; VI
= vocational identity; Dec = decidedness; Com = comfort; SC = self-clarity; Know = knowledge;
Deci = decisiveness; CCI = career choice importance.
*p < .05.