Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Argue of Issue
Argue of Issue
Argue of Issue
Whether NWRWA has locus standii to challenge the judgement of the apex court?
The Apex stated that “she has two children and they are being taken care of by the
appellant and she is leading a happy married life. This Court cannot shut its eyes to the
ground reality and disturb the happy family life of the appellant and the prosecutrix'
Supreme Court has taken a standing with respect to child marriages and cleared
ambiguities regarding Section 3 and 9. It upheld the importance of the intention behind
the Act rather than simply going by the literal interpretation of provisions.
due to the literal provisions rather the facts, circumstances and intention of the parties
and the legislation should be given due consideration. Though the present judgment has
cleared few ambiguities, but there are still few loop holes in the present act
Ratio Decidendi
that every child of the age of 6-14 years shall have a right to free and compulsory
Chapter 6 of the Act has special provisions for the protection of the right of children. The
National Commission for Protection of Child Rights received a statutory status after
passing of this Act. By virtue of Article 21-A of the Constitution, the right of children
to free and compulsory education was made a Fundamental Right. Every child between
the ages of 6-14 now have a right to free education in a school till elementary level.
Provision -
o Section 2(a) in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 - Meaning of a child is
provided as a female who is less than 18 years of age and a male who is less than 21 years
of age.
o.Section 3 in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 provides that every child
marriage is voidable if the contracting party was a child at the time of the marriage.
o Section 9 in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 provides punishment for a male
o Section 12(a) in The Prohibition of Child Marriage Act, 2006 provides for nullity of