CONST LAW1 DEPT SYLLABUS SY2022-2023 Updated

San Beda University
College of Law
COURSE SYLLABUS
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW 1
COURSE CODE:
COURSE CREDIT: 4 UNITS
COURSE PREREQUISITE/S: NONE
FACULTY: ATTY. ______________________
EMAIL ADDRESS: ____________________________
TERM/ACADEMIC YEAR: FIRST SEMESTER - SCHOOL YEAR 2022-2023
DAY/TIME/ROOM/SECTION: __________________________
COURSE DELIVERY MODE: BLENDED OR FULL ONLINE
CONSULTATION DAY/TIME: __________________________
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
A comprehensive study of constitutional framework of the Republic of the

Philippines, its three (3) branches the government (with their powers and inter-
relationship), the Constitutional Commissions, and the principles of
governmental accountability.
COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)
Know and understand the Constitution, memorize provisions, critical and

analytical thinking, effective in written and oral communication, logical
reasoning, and sound judgment, exercise of proper professional and ethical
responsibilities.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):
1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

2. Comprehension/Understanding: describe, explain, identify, recognize
3. Application/Applying: choose, demonstrate, implement, perform
4. Analysis/Analyzing: analyze, categorize, compare, differentiate
5. Evaluation/Evaluating: assess, critique, evaluate, rank, rate
6. Synthesis/Creating: construct, design, formulate, organize, synthesize
Upon completion of the Constitutional Law I course, the student is expected to be able to:
Expected College of
Law Graduate LEARNING OUTCOMES (LOs)
Attributes (ELGAs)
Critical and analytical LO1. Explain, during class recitation and discussion, the basic
thinking framework of the 1987 Constitution, the composition and powers of
Effective in written and the branches of government, and the different Constitutional
oral communication principles relative to governmental administration.
Logical reasoning LO2. Analyze the practical and Constitutional implications of
Sound judgment Supreme Court rulings, current and proposed statutes, regulations,
Exercise of proper legal arguments, and strategies to the workings and operation of the
professional and ethical government.
responsibilities LO3. Assess the Constitutionality of current and proposed
governmental action in consideration of the policies sought to be
achieved.
LO4. Utilize legal research tools to gather information and materials
that aid in the analysis of legal issues in submitting Position Paper
that could serve as a basis of governmental policies.
ASSESSMENT/GRADING SYSTEM:
The student will be graded according to the following:
Percentage
(Weight is based
Scope of Work
Requirements (Based on the Learning Outcomes) on the
(Individual)
importance of
the LO)
LO1 Class recitations, Quizzes, Case Digests, Individual
LO2 and discussion Individual
LO3 Individual
LO4 - - Research Paper, Case Study Individual
Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Midterm Exams Individual 16.67%
Class Standing after Midterms Individual 33.33%
Final Exams Individual 33.33%
TOTAL 100
LEARNING PLAN:
Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

learning resources to be used; weekly schedule of the topics to be taken up; and
the learning methods to be utilized that are most likely to lead students towards
the goals and learning outcomes that were defined.
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
TOPIC/CONTENT (activities designed
RESOURCES of each
(arrangement or sequence or deployed by the
(print and non-print Topic,
of the major topics is based teacher to bring
materials and online/ Assign,
on a logical order) about, or create the
open-access resources) Exam for
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Course Introduction
 Course overview Syllabus 25 to 29 Lecture
 Course assignments July 2022 Discussion
 Course requirements
MODULE 1:
01 to 06  Recitation
I. The Constitution  Textbooks August  Case study &
2022 reporting
 Basic Principles and  Supreme Court  Discussion/
Concepts Decisions: lecture
- Political Law-  Quiz
Concept and  People v. Perfecto
Scope [43 Phil 887]
- Constitutional  Macariola v.
2
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Law and Asuncion [114 SCRA
Constitution - 77]
Concepts  De Leon v. Esguerra
[G.R. No. 78059,
 Effectivity of the August 31, 1987]
Constitution  Manila Prince Hotel
v. GSIS [G.R. No.
 Rules on 122156, February 3,
Interpreting 1997]
Doubtful Provision  Francisco v. House of
of the Constitution Representatives [G.R. 08 to 13  Recitation
No. 160261, August  Case study &
November 10, 2003] 2022 reporting
 Discussion/
lecture
 Textbooks Quiz
 Article XVII, 1987

II. Amendments & Constitution
Revision
 Republic Act No. 6735
 Source of Power to
Propose Changes to  Supreme Court
the Constitution Decisions:
 Gonzales v.
 Proposal COMELEC [G.R.
 Amendment v. No. L-28196,
Revision November 9, 1967]
 Modes of  Imbong v.
Proposing COMELEC [G.R.
Amendments or No. L-32432,
Revision September 11, 1970]
 Requirements  Santiago v.
for Proposals COMELEC [G.R.
No. 127325, March
 Ratification 19, 1997]
 Doctrine of  Occena v.
Proper COMELEC [G.R.
Submission No. 56350, April 2,
 Requirements 1981]
for Ratification  Tolentino v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. L-34150,
October 16, 1971]
 Sanidad v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. L-44640,
October 12, 1976]
3
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Province of Cotabato
v. The Gov’t. of the
RP Peace Panel on
Ancestral Domain
[G.R. No. 183591,
October 14, 2008]
 Lambino v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 174153, October
25, 2006]
Lambino v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 174153,
November 21, 2006]
MODULE 2:
Concept of the State

 State v. Country August  Case study &
2022 reporting
 Elements of State  Textbooks  Discussion/
 Territory lecture
 People  Article I, 1987  Quiz
 Government Constitution
 Constituent
v. Ministrant  Republic Act No. 3046
 Doctrine of
Parens  Republic Act No. 5446
Patriae
 De Facto  Republic Act No. 9522
Government
 Sovereignty  United Nations
 Nature and Convention on the Law
Characteristi of the Sea (UNCLOS)
cs
 Effect of  Sec. 1, Article IV, 1987
Belligerent Constitution
Occupation
 Concept of  Chapter 2, Book I,
Auto- Administrative Code of
Limitation 1987
 Sec. 2(1), Administrative

Code of 1987
 PCA Case Nº2013-19,

“In the Matter of the
4
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
South China Sea
Arbitration” Between the
Republic of the
Philippines and the
People’s Republic of
China
 Supreme Court
Decisions:
 Collector of Internal
Revenue v. Campos
Rueda [G.R. No. L-
13250, October 29,
1971]
 Magallona v. Ermita
[G.R. No. 187167, 16
August 2011
 Edu v. Ericta [G.R.
No. 32069, October
24, 1970]
 Bacani v. National
Coconut Corporation,
G.R. No. L-9657,
November 29, 1956]
 Philippine Virginia
Tobacco
Administration v.
Court of Industrial
Relations, 65 SCRA
416
 Gov’t of the
Phililppine Islands v.
Monte de Piedad, 35
SCRA 738
 Cabañas v. Pilapil, 58
SCRA 94
 Co Kim Cham v.
Valdez Tan Keh, 75
Phil. 113
 Laurel v. Misa, 77
Phil. 856
 Ruffy v. Chief of
Staff, 75 Phil. 875
 People v. Gozo [G.R.
No. L-36409,
October 26, 1973]
 People v. Perfecto, 43
5
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Phil. 887
 Macariola v.
Asuncion, 114 SCRA
77
 Vilas v. City of
Manila, 229 US 345
 Peralta v. Director of
Prisons, 75 Phil. 285
 Alcantara v. Director
of Prisons, 75 Phil.
749
MODULE 3:
State Immunity 29 August  Recitation

to 03  Case study &
 Concept of State  Textbooks September reporting
Immunity 2022  Discussion/
 Sec. 3, Article XVI, 1987 lecture
 Tests if Suit is Constitution  Quiz
Against the State
 Act No. 3083
 Suit Against Public
Officers  Commonwealth Act No.
327, as amended by
 Suit Against Presidential Decree No.
Government 1445
Agencies
 Incorporated v.  Supreme Court
Unincorporated Decisions:
 Local
Government  Philippine Agila
Units Satellite, Inc. v.
Lichauco, et al. [G.R.
 Suit Against Foreign No. 134887, July 27,
State and 2006]
International  Republic v. Sandoval
Organizations [G.R. No. 84607,
March 19, 1993]
 Consent to be Sued  United States of
 Express v. America v. Guinto
Implied [G.R. No. 76607,
 Scope of February 26, 1990]
Consent -  Sanders v. Veridiano,
Suability v. 162 SCRA 88
Liability  Vinzons-Chato v.
Fortune Tobacco
 Remedies Corporation [G.R.
6
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
No. 141309,
December 23, 2008]
 Department of Health
v. Philippine
Pharmawealth [G.R.
No. 182358,
February 20, 2013]
 Shauf v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
90314 November 27,
1990]
 Wylie v. Rarang
[G.R. No. 74135,
May 28, 1992]
 Republic v.
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
No. 142476, March
20, 2001]
 United States of
America v. Reyes
[G.R. No. 79253,
March 1, 1993]
 Department of Health
Secretary v.
Philippine
Pharmawealth [G.R.
No. 169304, March
13, 2007]
 Rayo v. CFI of
Bulacan, 110 SCRA
460
 Air Transportation
Office v. Spouses
Ramos, G.R. No.
159402, 23 February
2011
 Municipality of San
Fernando v. Firme
195 SCRA 692
 Bureau of Printing v.
Bureau of Printing
Employees
Association, 1 SCRA
340
 Mobil Philippines v.
Customs Arrastre
Services Division, 18
SCRA 1120
7
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Merritt v.
Government of the
Philippines Islands,
34 Phil. 311;
 Department of
Agriculture v. NLRC,
227 SCRA 693
 Amigable v. Cuenca,
43 SCRA 460
 EPG Construction v.
Secretary Vigilar,
G.R. No. 131544, 16
March 2001;
 Froilan v. Pan
Oriental Shipping,
G.R. No. L-6060, 30
September 1950;
 Lim v. Brownell, 107
Phil. 345;
 United States v.
Ruiz,136 SCRA 487;
 Holy See v. Rosario
[G.R. No. 101949,
December 1, 1994]
 China National
Machinery &
Equipment
Corporation (Group)
v. Sta. Maria, 665
SCRA 189
 Republic of
Indonesia v. Vinzon
[G.R. No. 154705,
June 26, 2003]
 Minucher v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
142396, February 11,
2003]
 Lasco v. UNRFNRE
[G.R. Nos. 109095-
1995]
 Republic v. Villasor,
54 SCRA 83
 Municipality of
Makati v. Court of
Appeals, 190 SCRA
206
8
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 University of the
Philippines v. Dizon
[G.R. No. 171182,
August 23, 2012]
MODULE 4:
Declaration of Principles
& State Policies 05 to 17  Recitation
September  Case study &
 Democracy and 2022 reporting
Republicanism  Textbooks  Discussion/
lecture
 Generally Accepted  Article II, 1987  Quiz
Principles of Constitution
International Law
 Municipal Law  Supreme Court
v. Treaty Decisions:
 Doctrine of  Villavicencio v.
Incorporation Lukban, 39 Phil. 778
 Doctrine of  Poe-Llamanzares v.
Transformation COMELEC [G.R.
No. 221697,221698-
 Service in defense 700, 8 March 2016]
of the State  Kuroda v. Jalandoni,
42 O.G. 4282
 Separation of  Agustin v. Edu, [G.R.
Church and State No. L-49112,
 Concept and February 2, 1979]
Rationale  Gonzales v.
 Different Kinds Hechanova, 9 SCRA
of Wall of 230
Separation  Ichong v. Hernandez,
 Accommodation 101 Phil. 115
 Tests to  People v. Lagman &
Determine Zosa, 66 Phil. 13
Accommodation  Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64
Phil. 201
 International Policy  Garces v. Estenzo,
 Government 104 SCRA 510
Policies  Estrada v. Escritor
 Trade [A.M. No. P-02-
 Nuclear Weapon 1651, June 22, 2006]
 In Re Letter of Tony
 Social Justice Valenciano [A.M.
 Different No. 10-4-19-SC,
Concepts March 7, 2017]
 Fonacier v. Court of
 Policy on Human Appeals [G.R. No. L-
9
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Rights 5917, January 28,
1955]
 Protection on  Taruc v. Dela Cruz
Family, Life and [G.R. No. 144801,
Children March 10, 2005]
 Same Sex  Tañada v. Angara,
Marriage 272 SCRA 18
 Abortion  Calalang v. Williams,
 Commencement 70 Phil. 726
of Constitutional  Ondoy v. Ignacio, 97
Protection for SCRA 611
the Unborn  Salonga v. Farrales,
 Double Effect 105 SCRA 459
Principle  Sec. of National
 Curfew Defense v. Manalo
Ordinances [G.R. No. 180906,
October 7, 2008]
 Gender Equality  Obergefell v. Hodges
[576 U.S _ (2015)]
 Health and  Falcis v. Civil
Environment Registrar General
 Writ of [G.R. No. 217910,
Kalikasan September 3, 2019]
 Imbong v. Ochoa,
 Policy on Education G.R. No. 204819, 8
April 2014
 Autonomy of  Samahan ng mga
Private Enterprises Progresibong
Kabataan (SPARK)
 Agrarian Reform v. Quezon City [G.R.
No. 225442, August
8, 2017]
 Autonomy of Local
 Oposa v. Factoran,
Government
224 SCRA 792
 Relationship
 Metropolitan Manila
Between the
Development
National and
Authority, et al. v.
Local
Concerned Residents
Governments
of Manila Bay [G.R.
 Kinds of
No. 171947-48,
Decentralization
December 18, 2008]
 Associative
 Guingona v. Carague,
Principle
196 SCRA 221
 Association of Small
 Opportunity to
Landowners v. Sec.
Public Service
of Agrarian Reform,
 175 SCRA 343
 Policy of Full Public  Hacienda Luisita vs.
10
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Disclosure Presidential Agrarian
 Concept of Full Reform Council
Public [G.R. No. 171101,
Disclosure July 5, 2011]
 Right to  Basco v. PAGCOR,
Information 197 SCRA 52
 Limitation of the  Limbona v.
Policy on Full Mangelin, 170 SCRA
Public 786
Disclosure  Province of North
 Privileged Cotabato v. Gov’t. of
Information the Republic of the
Philippines Peace
Panel on Ancestral
Domain [G.R. No.
183591, October 14,
2008]
 Pamatong v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 161872, April
13, 2004]
 Legaspi v. Civil
Service Commission,
150 SCRA 530
 Valmonte v.
Belmonte, 170 SCRA
256
 Chavez vs.
Presidential
Commission on Good
Government [G.R.
No. 130716,
December 9, 1998]
 In Re: Production of
Court Records and
Documents and the
Attendance of Court
officials and
employees as
witnesses under the
subpoenas of
February 10, 2012
and the various letters
for the Impeachment
Prosecution Panel
dated January 19 and
25, 2012, [February
14, 2012]
11
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
MODULE 6:
I. Separation of Powers
 Concept and Basis September  Case study &
 Textbooks 2022 reporting
 Relationship  Discussion/
Between the Three  Supreme Court lecture
Departments Decisions:  Quiz
 Checks and  Angara v. Electoral

Balances Commission, 63 Phil.
139
 Blending of Powers  Belgica v. Ochoa
[G.R. No. 208566,
 Political and November 11, 2013]
Justiciable  Casibang v. Aquino,
Questions 92 SCRA 642
 Tañada v. Cuenco,
 Expanded Judicial 100 Phil. 1101
Power of the Courts  Sanidad v.
of Justice COMELEC [G.R.
No. L-44640, 12
October 1976]
 Daza v. Singson, 180
SCRA 496
 Ongsiako-Reyes v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 207264, June 25,
2013]
MODULE 6:
II. Delegation of Powers

26 Sept to  Recitation
 Concept  Textbooks 01 October  Case study &
2022 reporting
 Tests of Valid  Sections 23(2) and 28(2),  Discussion/
Delegation Article VI, 1987 lecture
Constitution  Quiz
 Permissible
Delegation of  Supreme Court
Legislative Power Decisions:
 Emergency
Power  People v. Vera, 65
 Tariff Power Phil. 56
 Administrative  Araneta v. Dinglasan,
Agencies 84 Phil. 368
 Local  Rodriguez v. Gella,
12
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Government 92 Phil. 603
Units  Garcia v. Executive
 People Secretary, 211 SCRA
219
 ABAKADA Guro v.
Ermita [G.R. No.
168056, September 1,
2005]
 Eastern Shipping
Lines v. POEA [G.R.
No. 76633, October
18, 1988]
 Ynot v. IAC, 148
SCRA 659
 Belgica v. Ochoa
[G.R. No. 208566,
November 11, 2013]
MIDTERM First Week

EXAMINATIONS of October
2022
MODULE 7:
Legislative Department & 10 to 22  Recitation

Powers of Congress October  Case study &
 Textbooks 2022 reporting
 Bicameralism  Discussion/
 Article VI, 1987 lecture
 Senate Constitution  Quiz
 Composition
 Qualifications of  Republic Act No. 6735
Senators
 Term and Term  Republic Act No. 6645
Limit
 Supreme Court
 House of Decisions:
Representatives  Pimentel. Jr. v.
 Composition COMELEC [G.R.
 Qualifications of No. 133509,
Members of the February 9, 2000]
House of  Tobias v. Abalos, 239
Representatives SCRA 106
 Term and Term  Mariano, Jr. v.
Limit COMELEC, 242
SCRA 211
 Party-List System  Montejo v.
 Rules on COMELEC, G.R.
13
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Participation No. 118702, 16
 20% Allocation March 1995
 2% Percent  Aquino v.
Threshold COMELEC, G.R.
 3 Seat Limit No. 189793, 7 April
 Proportional 2010
Representation  Veterans Federation
Party vs. COMELEC
 Election of [G.R. No. 136781,
Members of October 6, 2000]
Congress  BANAT v.
 Regular COMELEC [G.R.
 Special No. 179271, April,
21 2009]
 Salaries and  Ang Bagong Bayani-
Perquisites OFW Labor Party v.
COMELEC [G.R.
 Legislative No. 147589, June 26,
Immunities 2001]
 Immunity from  Atong Paglaum, Inc.
Arrest v. COMELEC [G.R.
 Privileged No. 203766, April 2,
Speech 2013]
 Ang Ladlad LGBT
 Disclosures and Party v. COMELEC
Conflict of Interest [G.R. No. 190582,
April 8, 2010]
 Disqualifications  Abayon v. HRET
and Inhibitions [G.R. No. 189466,
 Incompatible February 11, 2010]
Office  Philippine Guardians
 Forbidden Brotherhood, Inc. v.
Office COMELEC, G.R.
No. 190529, April
 Legislative Sessions 29, 2010
 Regular  Bantay Republic Act
 Special or BA-RA 7941 v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 177271, May 4,
 Adjournment
2007]
 Day-to-Day
 Romualdez-Marcos
 Sine Die
v. COMELEC, 248
 Final
SCRA 300
Adjournment
 Aquino v.
 Adjournment for
COMELEC, 248
more than three
SCRA 400
days
 Co v. HRET, G.R.
 Adjournment in
Nos. 92191-92, July
other places
14
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
30, 1991]
 Organization of  Frivaldo v.
Congress COMELEC [G.R.
No. 87193, June 23,
 Quorum 1989]
 Dimaporo v. Mitra
 Disciplinary Power [G.R. No. 96859,
October 15, 1991]
 Rule-Making Power  Jimenez v.
 Legislative Journal Cabangbang, 17
SCRA 876
 Legislative Record  Osmeña v. Pendatun,
109 Phil. 863
 Pobre v. Defensor-
 Electoral Tribunals
Santiago [A.C. No.
 Composition
7399, August 25,
 Manner of
2009]
Apportionment
 Puyat v. De Guzman
 Powers/Function
[G.R. No. 51122,
 Jurisdiction
March 25, 1982]
 Santiago v.
 Commission on
Guingona, Jr. [G.R.
Appointments
No. 134577,
 Composition
November 18, 1998]
 Manner of
 Baguilat v. Alvarez
Apportionment
[G.R. No. 227757,
 Powers/Function
July 25, 2017]
 Avelino v. Cuenco,
 Inquiries in Aid of 83 Phil. 17
Legislation  Arroyo v. De
 Executive Venecia, [G.R. No.
Privilege 127255, June 26,
 Prohibition on 1998]
Members of the  Santiago v.
Armed Forces Sandiganbayan [G.R.
No. 128055, April
 Question Hour 18, 2001]
 Paredes, Jr. v.
 Declaration a State Sandiganbayan [G.R.
of War No. 108251, January
31, 1996]
 Bills that Must  Arroyo v. De
Originate from the Venecia, G.R. No.
House of 127255, August 14,
Representatives 1997 and June 26,
1998]
 Appropriation  United States v. Pons,
 Annual 34 Phil. 729
15
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Special  Casco Philippine
 Procedure Chemical Co. v.
 Budget Cycle Gimenez, 7 SCRA 347
 Budget Re-  Philippine Judges
Enactment Association v. Prado
 Budget [G.R. No. 105371,
Augmentation November 11, 1993]
 Reversion of  Robles v. HRET
Budget to the [G.R. No. 86647,
General Funds February 5, 1990]
 Special Funds  Angara v. Electoral
 Budget Commission, 63 Phil.
Impoundment 139
 Sectarian  Lazatin v. HRET
Purposes [G.R. No. 84297,
December 8, 1988]
 Taxation  Abbas v. Senate
 Principles of Electoral Tribunal,
Taxation 166 SCRA 651
 Exemption  Bondoc v. Pineda,
201 SCRA 792
 Law Making Power  Chavez v.
 Formal COMELEC [G.R.
Requirements No. 105323, July 3,
 Substantive 1992]
Requirements  Pimentel v. House of
 Certification of Representatives
Bills Electoral Tribunal
 Bicameral [G.R. No. 141489,
Conference November, 29, 2002]
Committee  Ongsiako-Reyes v.
COMELEC [G.R.
 Veto Power of the No. 207264, June 25,
President 2013]
 Regular Veto  Daza v. Singson, 180
 Item Veto SCRA 496
 Doctrine of  Coseteng v. Mitra,
Inappropriate 187 SCRA 377
Provision  Guingona v.
 Legislative Veto Gonzales, 214 SCRA
789
 Restrictions on the  Drilon v. De Venecia,
Legislative Power G.R. No. 180055, 31
 Increase in the July 2009, and
Jurisdiction of Madrigal v. Villar,
the Supreme G.R. No. 183055, 31
Court July 2009
 Grant of Title of  Bengzon v. Senate
16
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Nobility Blue Ribbon
Committee, 203
 Initiative and SCRA 767
Referendum  Standard Chartered
Bank v. Senate
Committee on Banks
[G.R. No. 167173,
December 27, 2007]
 Arnault v. Nazareno,
87 Phil. 29
 Balag v. Senate [G.R.
No. 234608, July 3,
2018]
 Senate v. Ermita
[G.R. No. 169777,
April 20, 2006]
 Gudani v. Senga
[G.R. No. 170165,
August 15, 2006]
 In re Petition for
Issuance of Writ of
Habeas Corpus of
Camilo L. Sabio
[G.R. No. 174340,
October 17, 2006]
 Neri v. Senate
Committee on
Accountability of
Public Officers and
Investigations [G.R.
No. 180643, March
25, 2008]
 Garcillano v. House
of Representatives
[G.R. No. 170338,
December 23, 2008]
 Tolentino v.
Secretary of Finance
[G.R. No. 115455,
August 25, 1994 and
October 30, 1995]
 Alvarez v. Guingona,
252 SCRA 695
 Lawyers Against
Monopoly and
Poverty v. Secretary
of DBM [G.R. No.
164987, April 24,
17
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
2012]
 Garcia v. Mata, 65
SCRA 520
 Demetria v. Alba
[G.R. No. 71977,
February 27, 1987]
 Philconsa v.
Enriquez, 235 SCRA
506
 Belgica v. Ochoa
[G.R. No. 208566,
November 11, 2013]
 Araullo v. Aquino III
[G.R. No. 209287,
July 1, 2014]
 Philconsa v.
Gimenez, 15 SCRA
479
 Tio v. Videogram
Regulatory Board,
151 SCRA 208
 Philippine Judges
Association v. Prado
[G.R. No. 105371,
November 11, 1993]
 ABAKADA Guro v.
Ermita [G.R. No.
2005]
 Gonzales v.
Macaraig, 191 SCRA
452
 Bengzon v. Drilon,
208 SCRA 133
 Philconsa v.
Enriquez, 235 SCRA
506
 Lung Center of the
Philippines v.
Quezon City [G.R.
No. 144104, June 29,
2004]
 Province of Abra v.
Hernando, 107 SCRA
104
 Abra Valley College
v. Aquino, 162
SCRA 106
18
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Pascual v. Secretary
of Public Works, 110
Phil. 331
 Aglipay v. Ruiz, 64
Phil. 201
 Guingona v. Carague,
196 SCRA 221
 Osmeña v. Orbos
[G.R. No. 99886,
March 31, 1993]
 First Lepanto
Ceramics, Inc. v.
Court of Appeals
[G.R. No. 110571,
March 10, 1994 and
October 7, 1994]
 Diaz v. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
109698, December 5,
1994]
 Subic Bay
Metropolitan
Authority v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 125416,
September 26, 1996]
MODULE 8:
Executive Department &

Powers of the President
 Textbooks 24 October  Recitation
 Executive Power to 05  Case study &
 Arti cle VII, 1987 November reporting
 Non-Executive Constitution 2022  Discussion/
Powers of the lecture
President  Supreme Court  Quiz
Decisions:
 Residual Power
 Marcos v. Manglapus
 Immunity of the [G.R. No. 88211,
President September 15, 1989]
 Ocampo v. Enriquez
 Qualifications of the [G.R. 225973,
President and Vice- November 8, 2016]
President  Estrada v. Arroyo
[G.R. No. 146738,
 Term and Term March 2, 2001]
19
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Limit  Soliven v. Makasiar,
167 SCRA 393
 Canvassing of Votes  Brillantes v
of the President and COMELEC [G.R.
Vice-President No. 163193, June 15,
2004]
 Presidential and  Lopez v. Senate
Vice-Presidential [G.R. 163556, June 8,
Electoral Tribunal 2004]
 Pormento v. Estrada
 Salaries and [G.R. No. 191988,
Perquisites of the August 31, 2010]
President  Doromal v.
Sandiganbayan [G.R.
 Rules on Succession No. 85468,
 Failure to September 7, 1989]
Qualify  Civil Liberties Union
 Failure of v. Executive
Election Secretary, 194 SCRA
 Death, 317
permanent  Dela Cruz v.
disability or Commission on
resignation Audit [G.R. No.
138489, November
 Vacancy in the 29, 2001]
Office of the Vice-  Funa v. Agra [G.R.
President No. 191644,
February 19, 2013]
 Procedure in calling  Aytona v. Castillo
a Special Election [G.R. No. L-19313,
January 19, 1962]
 In re Appointments
 Temporary Inability
dated March 30, 1998
of the President
of Hon. Valenzuela
 Disclosure of the
and Hon. Vallarta
Health Condition of
[A.M. No. 98-5-01-
the President
SC, November 9,
1998]
 Disqualifications of  De Castro v. Judicial
the President, and Bar Council
his/her family, [G.R. No. 191002,
Cabinet members March 17, 2010]
and other officers  Binamira v. Garucho,
188 SCRA 154
 Power of  Sarmiento v. Mison,
Appointment 156 SCRA 549
 Regular  Bautista v. Salonga,
 Ad Interim 172 SCRA 16
20
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Confirmation by  Quintos-Deles v.
the Commission Commission on
of Appointments Appointments, 177
 Midnight SCRA 259
Appointment  Calderon v. Carale,
 Appointment for 208 SCRA 254
Partisan Political  Tarrosa v. Singson
Consideration [G.R. No. 111243,
May 25, 1994]
 Power of Control  Soriano v. Lista
and Supervision [G.R. No. 153881,
March 24, 2003]
 Faithful Execution  Pimentel v. Ermita
Clause/Take Care [G.R. No. 164978,
Clause October 13, 2005]
 Flores v. Drilon
 Military Powers [G.R. No. 104732,
 Calling Out of June 22, 1993]
the Armed  Matibag v. Benipayo
Forces [G.R. No. 149036,
 Suspension of April 2, 2002]
the Privilege of  Luego v. Civil
the Writ of Service Commission,
Habeas Corpus 143 SCRA 327
 Declaration of  Pobre v. Mendieta,
Martial Law 224 SCRA 738
 Declaration of  Drilon v. Lim [G.R.
State of No. 112497, August
Rebellion 4, 1994]
 Convening of  Villena v. Secretary
the General of Interior, 67 Phil.
Court Martial 451
 Lacson-Magallanes
 Pardoning Power Co., Inc. v. Paño, 21
 Conditions SCRA 895
 Limitations  City of Iligan v.
 Pardon Director of Lands,
 Amnesty 158 SCRA 158
 Commutation  Gascon v. Arroyo
 Reprieve [G.R. No. 78389,
October 16, 1989]
 Borrowing Power  Kilusang Bayan v.
Dominguez [G.R.
 Treaty Making and Nos. 85439 &
Diplomatic Powers 91927,January 13,
1992]
 Ang-Angco v.
 State of the Nation
Castillo, 9 SCRA 619
Address
21
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 National Marketing
Corp. v. Arca [G.R.
No. L-25743,
September 30, 1969]
 Biraogo v. The
Philippine Truth
Commission [G.R.
No. 192935,
December 7, 2010]
 Guazon v. De Villa,
181 SCRA 623
 Ruffy v. Chief of
Staff, 75 Phil. 875
 Olaguer v. Military
Commission No. 34,
150 SCRA 144
 Quiloña v. General
Court Martial, 206
SCRA 821
 Gudani v. Senga
[G.R. No. 170165,
August 15,2006]
 SANLAKAS v.
Reyes [G.R. No.
159085, February 3,
2004]
 David v. Macapagal-
Arroyo, G.R. No.
171396, May 3,
2006]
 IBP v. Zamora [G.R.
No. 141284, August
15, 2000]
 Fortun v. Macapagal-
Arroyo [G.R. No.
190293, March 20,
2012]
 Lagman v. Medialdea
[G.R. No. 231658,
July 4, 2017]
 Lagman v. Pimentel
[G.R. No. 235935,
February 6, 2018]
 Torres v. Gonzales
[G.R. No. 76872,
July 23, 1987]
 Monsanto v.
Factoran, 170 SCRA
22
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
190
 People v. Salle, Jr.,
250 SCRA 581
 Garcia v.
Commission on
Audit [G.R. No.
1993]
 Sabello v. DECS, 180
SCRA 623
 Llamas v. Orbos
[G.R. No. 99031,
October 15, 1991]
 Commissioner of
Customs v. Eastern
Sea Trading [G.R.
No. L-14279,
October 31, 1961]
 Pimentel v. Executive
Secretary [G.R. No.
158088, July 6, 2005]
 Bayan Muna v.
Romulo [G.R. No.
159618, February 1,
2011]
 Saguisag v. Ochoa,
Jr., [G.R. No.
212426, January 12,
2016]
MODULE 9:
Judicial Department &

Powers of the Judiciary  Recitation
 Textbooks 07 to 19  Case study &
 Judicial Power, November reporting
Traditional  Article VIII, 1987 2022  Discussion/
Constitution lecture
 Expanded Judicial  Quiz
Power  Supreme Court
Decisions:
 Requisites of
Judicial Inquiry  Ocampo v.
 Actual Case or Enriquez [G.R.
Controversy 225973, November
 Proper Party 8, 2016]
 Raised at the  Santiago vs.
Earliest Possible Bautista [G.R. No.
Opportunity L-25024, March
23
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Lis Mota 30, 1970]
 Exemptions  Limkaichong v.
COMELEC [G.R.
 Power to Define Nos. 178831-32,
Jurisdiction of 179120, 179132-
Courts 33, 179240-41,
April 1, 2009 and
 Fiscal Autonomy of July 30, 2009]
the Supreme Court  Daza vs. Singson,
180 SCRA 496
 The Supreme Court  Philippine
 Composition Association of
 En Banc Colleges and
 Division Universities vs.
 Qualification of Secretary of
Justices Education [G.R.
 Appointment to No. L-5279,
the Office October 31, 1955]
 Salaries  Mariano, Jr. vs.
 Term of Office COMELEC [G.R.
 Disqualifications No. 118577, March
 Removal from 7, 1995]
Office  David vs.
Macapagal-Arroyo
 Powers of the [G.R. No. 171396,
Supreme Court May 3, 2006]
 Original  Pormento vs.
Jurisdiction Estrada [G.R. No.
 Appellate and 191988, August 31,
Review 2010]
Jurisdiction  Macasiano vs.
 Order Change of National Housing
Venue Authority [G.R.
 Assignment of No. 107921, July 1,
Judges 1993]
 Appointment of  Joya vs. PCGG,
Officials and 225 SCRA 568
Employees in  Legaspi vs. Civil
the Judiciary Service
 Rule Making Commission, 150
Power SCRA 530
 Administrative  Dumlao vs.
Supervision over COMELEC [G.R.
Judges and No. L-52245,
Justices January 22, 1980]
 Disciplinary  Bugnay
Power over Construction &
Judges and Devt. Corp. vs.
24
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Justices Laron [G.R. No.
79983, August 10,
 Judicial and Bar 1989]
Council  Kilosbayan, Inc. vs.
 Composition Guingona [G.R.
 Regular No. 113375, May
Members 5, 1994]
 Ex Officio  Philconsa vs.
Members Enriquez, 235
 Appointment to SCRA 506
Office  Tatad vs. Garcia,
 Term Jr. [G.R. No.
 Powers and 114222, April 6,
Duties 1995]
 Oposa vs. Factoran,
 Decisions and 224 SCRA 792
Resolution  Kilosbayan vs.
 Formal Morato, 246 SCRA
Requirement 540
 Substantive  Lozada vs.
Requirement COMELEC [G.R.
 Period of No. L-59068,
Promulgation January 27, 1983]
 Mantruste Systems,
 Annual Report to Inc. vs. Court of
the President and Appeals [G.R. Nos.
the Congress 86540-41,
November 8, 1989]
 Malaga vs.
Penachos, Jr. [G.R.
No. 86695,
September 3, 1992]
 Bengzon vs.
Drilon, 208 SCRA
133
 Limketkai Sons
Milling, Inc. vs.
Court of Appeals,
261 SCRA 464
 De Castro vs.
Judicial and Bar
Council [G.R. No.
191002, March 17,
2010]
 Macalintal vs.
Presidential
Electoral Tribunal
[G.R. No. 191618,
25
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
November 23,
2010]
 Drilon vs. Lim
[G.R. No. 112497,
August 4, 1994]
 Larranaga vs. Court
of Appeals [G.R.
No. 130644, March
13, 1998]
 Bustos vs. Lucero
[G.R. No. L-2068,
October 20, 1948]
 First Lepanto
Ceramics, Inc. vs.
Court of Appeals
[G.R. No. 110571,
March 10, 1994
and October 7,
1994]
 Aruelo vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
107852, October
20, 1993]
 Javellana vs. DILG
[G.R. No. 102549,
August 10, 1992]
 Maceda vs.
Vasquez, 221
SCRA 469
 Raquiza vs.
Castañeda, Jr.
[A.M. No. 1312-
CFI, January 31,
1978]
 Kilosbayan vs.
Ermita [G.R. No.
177721, July 3,
2001]
 Dulay vs. JBC
[G.R No. 202143,
July 3, 2012]
 Chavez vs. JBC
[G.R. No. 202242,
July 17, 2012 and
April 16, 2013]
 Jardeleza v. Sereno
[G.R. No. 213181,
26
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
August 19, 2014]
 Aguinaldo vs.
Aquino [G.R. No.
224302, November
29, 2016]
 Nitafan vs.
Commissioner of
Internal Revenue
[G.R. No. 78780,
July 23, 1987]
 De la Llana vs.
Alba, 112 SCRA
294
 People vs. Gacott,
Jr., 246 SCRA 52
 In re Manzano
[A.M. No. 88-7-
1861-RTC, October
5, 1988]
 Prudential Bank vs.
Castro, 158 SCRA
646
 Consing vs. Court
of Appeals [G.R.
No. 78272, August
29, 1989]
 Nicos Industrial
Corp. vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
88709, February
11, 1992]
 Mendoza vs. CFI,
66 SCRA 96
 Borromeo vs. Court
of Appeals, 186
SCRA 1
 Komatsu Industries
(Phils.), Inc. vs.
Court of Appeals,
G.R. No. 127682,
April 24, 1998]
 Oil and Natural
Gas Commission
vs. Court of
Appeals [G.R. No.
114323, July 23,
1998 and 28
September 1999]
27
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Francisco vs.
Permskul [G.R. No.
81006, May 12,
1989]
 Valdez vs. CA
[G.R. No. 163208,
August 13, 2008]
 Odchigue-Bondoc
vs. Tan [G.R. No.
186652, October 6,
2010]
MODULE 10:
Constitutional
Commissions
 Textbooks 21 to 26  Recitation
 Common Provisions November  Case study &
 Independence  Article IX, 1987 2022 reporting
and Fiscal Constitution  Discussion/
Autonomy lecture
 Salaries and  Supreme Court Revised  Quiz
Perquisites Administrative Circular
 Disqualifications No. 1-95
and Inhibitions
of Members of  Supreme Court
the Decisions:
Constitutional  Aruelo v. Court of
Commission Appeals [G.R. No.
 Rule Making 107852, October 20,
Power 1993]
 Quasi-Judicial  Cua v. COMELEC
Power [G.r. No. 80519-21,
December 17, 1987]
 Civil Service  Estrella v.
Commission COMELEC [G.R.
 Composition No. 160465, May 27,
 Appointment to 2004]
Office  Acena v. Civil
 Qualification Service Commission
 Powers and [G.R. No. 90780,
Duties February 6, 1991]
 Term and Term  Vital-Gozon v. Court
Limit of Appeals [G.R. No.
101428, August 5,
 Civil Service 1992]
 Filipinas Engineering
 Appointments and and Machine Shop v.
Termination of Ferrer [G.R. No. L-
28
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Office 31455, February 28,
 Career Service 1985]
 Policy  Mateo v. Court of
Determining Appeals [G.R. No.
 Primarily 113219, August 14,
Confidential 1995]
 Highly  Trade Union of the
Technical Phils. v. National
Housing Corp. G.R.
 Prohibition on No. L-49677, May 4,
Partisan Political 1989]
Campaign  De los Santos v.
Mallare [G.R. No. L-
 Security of Tenure 3881, August 31,
1950]
 Prohibition on  Salazar v. Mathay
Appointment to the [G.R. No. L-44061,
Government of September 20, 1976
Losing Candidate  Corpus v. Cuaderno
[G.R. No. L-23721,
 Prohibition on March 31, 1965]
Additional, Double  Luego v. Civil
and Indirect Service Commission,
Compensation 143 SCRA 327
 Prov of Camarines
 Commission on Sur v. Court of
Election Appeals [G.R. No.
 Composition 104639, July 14,
 Appointment to 1995]
Office  SSS Employees
 Qualification Association v. Court
 Powers and of Appeals, 175
Duties SCRA 686
 Term and Term  Civil Liberties Union
Limit v. Executive
Secretary, 194 SCRA
 Commission on 317
Audit  Flores v. Drilon
 Composition [G.R. No. 104732,
 Appointment to June 22, 1993]
Office  Quimson v. Ozaeta
 Qualification [G.R. No. L-8321,
 Powers and March 26, 1956]
Duties  Cayetano v. Monsod
 Term and Term [G.R. No. 10013,
Limit September 3, 1991
 Brillantes v. Yorac,
192 SCRA 358
29
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
 Lindo v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 95016,
February 11, 1991]
 Gallardo v. Tabamo
[G.R. No. 104848,
January 29, 1993]
 Relampagos v.
Cumba [G.R. No.
118861, April 27,
1995]
 Edding v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 112060, July 17,
1995]
 Galido v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 95346,
January 18, 1991]
 People v. Inting
[G.R. No. 88919,
July 25, 1990]
 People v. Basilla
[G.R. Nos. 83938-40,
November 6, 1989]
 People v. Delgado
[G.R. No. 93419-32,
September 18, 1990]
 COMELEC v. Silva
[G.R. No. 129417,
February 10, 1998]
 Arroyo v.
Department of Justice
[G.R. No. 199082,
September 18, 2012]
 Sarmiento v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 105628, August
6, 1992]
 Reyes v. RTC of
Oriental Mindoro
[G.R. No. 108886,
May 5, 1995]
 National Press Club
v. COMELEC [G.R.
No. 102653, March
5, 1992]
 Telecommunications
& Broadcast
30
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
Attorneys of the
Phils. v. COMELEC
[G.R. No. 132922,
April 21, 1998]
 Adiong v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 103956, March
31, 1992]
 Sanidad v.
COMELEC [G.R.
No. 90878, January
29, 1990]
 Funa v. Villar [G.R.
No. 192791, April
24, 2012]
 Guevarra v. Gimenez
[G.R. No. L-17115,
November 30, 1962]
 Orocio v.
Commission on
Audit [G.R. No.
75959, August 31,
1992]
 Osmeña v.
Commission on
Audit, 238 SCRA
463
 Sambeli v. Province
of Isabela, 210 SCRA
80
 Bustamante v.
Commissioner on
Audit, 216 SCRA
134
 Saligumba v.
Commission on
Audit [G.R. No. L-
61676, October 18,
1982]
 Philippine Airlines v.
Commission on
Audit [G.R. No.
91890, June 9, 1995]
 Bagatsing v.
Committee on
Privatization, 246
SCRA 334
31
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
MODULE 11:
Accountability of Public
Officers 28
 Textbooks November  Recitation
 Impeachable to 03  Case study &
Officers  Article XI, 1987 December reporting
Constitution 2022  Discussion/
 Different Modes of lecture
Filing of  Republic Act No. 8249  Quiz
Impeachment
Complaint  Republic Act No. 1379
 Initiation of  Republic Act No. 6770

Impeachment
Proceedings  Supreme Court
 One Year Ban Decisions:
Rule
 Articles of  Francisco v. House of
Impeachment Representatives [G.R.
No. 160261,
 Impeachment Case November 10, 2003]
 Gutierrez v. House of
 Extent of Representatives
Impeachment Committee on
Proceedings Justice, [G.R. No.
 Office of the 2011]
Ombudsman  Republic v. Sereno
 Composition [G.R. No. 237428,
 Qualification May 11, 2018]
 Term of Office  Khan v. Office of the
 Powers and Ombudsman [G.R.
Duties No. 125296, July 20,
 Disqualifications 2006]
and Inhibitions  Orap v.
Sandiganbayan, 139
SCRA 352
 Villavert v. Desierto
[G.R. No. 133715,
February 23, 2000]
 Office of the
Ombudsman v.
Madriaga [G.R. No.
164316, September
27, 2006]
32
WEEK/
LEARNING
DATE
METHODS
LEARNING (Schedule
RESOURCES of each
conditions for
the entire
learning)
semester)
FINAL 1st or 2nd
EXAMINATIONS Week of
December
2022
TEXTBOOK/REFERENCE BOOK:
1. Philippine Political Law, Isagani A. Cruz and Carlo L. Cruz

2. Outline/Reviewer in Political Law, Justice Antonio Eduardo B. Nachura
3. 1987 Constitution of the Rep. of the Phils. Commentary by Fr. J. Bernas
4. The Phil. Constitutional Law Vol. 1 by H. De Leon
5. Other books and references
POLICIES:
Policies and values that the teacher might want to communicate through the
syllabus concerning attendance, participation, academic integrity (e.g.
plagiarism, cheating, fabrication), missing assignments, missed exams, recording
classroom activities, online behavior during synchronous sessions, etc.
1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

2. Students are required to wear proper attire during online meetings.
3. Students who are called to recite but absent shall get a grade of 60.
4. Students who missed a quiz will get a grade of 60.
5. Students are prohibited from recording the online class as this is a violation of the
Copyright of the Professor.
Prepared by:
Atty. ______________________
Faculty, College of Law-SBU
Approved by:
Atty. MARCIANO G. DELSON

Dean, College of Law
Date Prepared by the Faculty: 25 July 2022
33

CONST LAW1 DEPT SYLLABUS SY2022-2023 Updated

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

You might also like

CONST LAW1 DEPT SYLLABUS SY2022-2023 Updated

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CONST LAW1 DEPT SYLLABUS SY2022-2023 Updated

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

San Beda University

A comprehensive study of constitutional framework of the Republic of the

COURSE GOALS: Expected College of Law Graduate Attributes (ELGAs)

Know and understand the Constitution, memorize provisions, critical and

LEARNING OBJECTIVES/OUTCOMES (LOs):

1. Knowledge/Remembering: define, list, recognize

The student will be graded according to the following:

Class standing before Midterms Individual 16.67%

Design or the structure of the course that includes content/topics to be covered;

 Article XVII, 1987

Concept of the State

 Sec. 2(1), Administrative

 PCA Case Nº2013-19,

State Immunity 29 August  Recitation

 Checks and  Angara v. Electoral

II. Delegation of Powers

MIDTERM First Week

Legislative Department & 10 to 22  Recitation

Executive Department &

Judicial Department &

 Initiation of  Republic Act No. 6770

1. Philippine Political Law, Isagani A. Cruz and Carlo L. Cruz

1. Attendance will be checked every meeting.

Atty. MARCIANO G. DELSON

Date Prepared by the Faculty: 25 July 2022

You might also like