IN THE COURT OF MR.

AMADUDDIN FAZIL CIVIL

JUDGE 1ST CLASS, SHAHPUR

C.M.A__________________/2020

in

Civil Suit No.___________/2020

Ghulam Sakina

……Plaintiff.

VERSUS

Muhammad Aslam

..…Defendant.
(SUIT FOR PARTITION U/S 4 OF THE PARTITION ACT, 2012 AND SEPARATE POSSESSION OF HOUSE
MEASURING 7.5 MARLA SITUTATED AT FAISAL COLONY SHAHPUR CITY, DISTRICT SARGODHA).

APPLICATION UNDER RULE 1 & 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 C.P.C.

1908 FOR TEMPORARY INJUNCTION.

1. That the plaintiff filed accompanying suit in this Learned

Court today which has not been fixed so far.

2. That the contents of the accompanying suit may also be

read as an integral part of this application.

3. That the plaintiff has prima facie a good arguable

case.and the suit is likely to be decreed in favor of the

plaintiff.
4. That the defendent no.1 is trying to demolish, re-built and

modify the suit property in order to change the existing

structure of the property. Hence, the defendent no.1, if not

not restrained from selling, alienating and transferring the

possession of the property to anyone , the plaintiff shall in

all propability suffer from an irreparable loss and injury.

5. That the balance of convenience lies in favor of the

plaintiff.

PRAYER: It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed

that the defendent no.1 may very kindly be restrained from

alienating; selling/transferring the property in question

and also be restrained from demolishing, re-builting or

modifying the basic structure of the property.

Ad-interim injunctive order till the decision of this

application may also be passed.

…Plaintiff
Through

CH. SAMAR ABBAS MAKEN MALIK MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Advocate High Court Advocate High Court.
Office Tehsil Courts, Shahpur
Saddar,District Sargodha.
IN THE COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE 1ST
CLASS, SHAHPUR.

C.M.A__________________/2020

in

Civil Suit No.___________/2020

Ghulam Sakina

……Plaintiff.

VERSUS

Muhammad Aslam

..…Defendant.
(SUIT FOR PARTITION U/S 4 OF THE PARTITION ACT, 2012 AND SEPARATE POSSESSION OF HOUSE
MEASURING 7.5 MARLA SITUTATED AT FAISAL COLONY SHAHPUR CITY, DISTRICT SARGODHA).

APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 7 OF THE PARTITION ACT, 2012

READ WITH SECTION 151 C.P.C. 1908 FOR TEMPORARY

INJUNCTION.

1. That the plaintiff filed accompanying suit in this Learned

Court today which has not been fixed so far.

2. That the contents of the accompanying suit may also be

read as an integral part of this application.

 3. That the plaintiff has prima facie a good case and the suit

is likely to be decreed in favor of the plaintiff.

4. That the defendent no.1 is in illegal possession of the

share of the plaintiff and defendent No.2 for which he is

entitiled to deposit mesne profits u/s 7 of the Partition Act.

2012.

PRAYER: It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed

that the defendent no.1 may very kindly be directed to

deposit interim mesne profits in the court.

Ad-interim mesne profits till the decision of this application

may also be passed.

…Plaintiff
Through

CH. SAMAR ABBAS MAKEN MALIK MUHAMMAD RAMZAN

Advocate High Court Advocate High Court.
Office Tehsil Courts, Shahpur
Saddar,District Sargodha.