Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mars Petcare Safety Standard Book 6.1 Overview V1 - 0
Mars Petcare Safety Standard Book 6.1 Overview V1 - 0
Mars Petcare Safety Standard Book 6.1 Overview V1 - 0
Version 1.0
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
TABLE OF CONTENT
NOTE:
This part is one of a series of documents belonging to the Mars Machinery Safety Standard which includes altogether the
following parts:
6.1 OVERVIEW
6.2 RISK ASSESSMENT
6.3 MACHINE GUARDING REQUIREMENTS
6.4 SAFETY FUNCTIONS
6.5 CONTROL OF HAZARDOUS ENERGY
6.6 VALIDATION
6.7 CE-MARKING & DOCUMENTATION
Page 2 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
REVISIONS
Page 3 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
5.1. OVERVIEW
5.1.1. Scope
This section gives general information on the different chapters which compose this Mars machine safety standard.
5.1.2. Attendance
This section is intended for personnel involved in machine safety and needs a quick reference guide about matters treated in
detail in each book. In all the books mentioned below it is assumed that the safety designs are developed by competent, trained
personnel.
This book gives guidance and a methodology to perform a risk assessment in accordance with EN ISO
12100:2010.
A risk assessment in an overall process. The goal of a risk assessment is to identify all hazard situations
associated to the use of a defined machine (or part of), then to estimate and evaluate the related risks in order
that the too high risks can be adequately reduced i.e. reduced according to the related standards.
All machinery (old or new) shall have its own documented risk assessment. Updating of this document is
necessary in case of any modification impacting operator safety and/or machine characteristics.
The best way to conduct a risk assessment is to form a team bringing different experiences and expertise and
knowledge about the use of the machine and the related required safety standards.
This book is intended for this team which usually consist of project engineers, maintenance engineers,
operations personal and SES/HSE personal. A team needs a minimum of 2 people, this team will have a
leader, usually, the Project manager.
Trainings on Safety of machinery standards are recommended, Functional Safety Certification as well but
cannot be imposed and are not compulsory.
From the outcome of a risk assessment, remediation project and safety requirements specification can be
developed in order to create a safer and compliant machine.
Page 4 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
This chapter gives information, guidance and requirement about Guarding solutions.
After risk assessment has been performed and machine needs upgrading, safety measures shall be identified,
designed and implemented to reduce the risks in an adequate manner as defined in the related risk assessment
document.
On existing machine, if the possibly to design out the risks is almost impossible then the first safety measure is
provide Guarding. Guarding needs to comply with applicable standards to close the related gaps.
Special requirements for Full Body Access (operator) are given in this book in order to ensure that people
cannot be imprisoned inside the guarded area and the machine restarted.
The use of this book is mostly intended for Engineers in charge of (remediation) design (Electrical, Mechanical,
Pneumatic and Hydraulic).
Typically, works are executed by trained personnel from the Maintenance department or by a competent
external System Integrator under supervision of a Project manager.
This chapter provides references and requirement regarding design of Safety Related Part of Control System
(SRP/CS) providing safety function(s) per EN ISO 13849-1:2015 about typical safety functions architectures.
After risk assessment has been performed and indicates that machine upgrading with safe operator access is
required, Safety functions need to be identified, designed and implemented in order to reduce the risks
according with ISO13849 to ensure safe interaction.
Several safety functions can be used and mixed. (Interlocking guard with or without guard locking, Light
Curtain, E-stop etc.).
The use of this book is mostly intended for Engineers in charge of (remediation) design (Electrical, Pneumatic
and Hydraulic).
Typically, works are executed by trained personnel from the Maintenance department or by a competent
external System Integrator under supervision of a Project manager.
This chapter gives basic information about means aimed at preventing unexpected machine start-up from
energy source to allow safe human interventions in danger zones.
The purpose of the control of hazardous energy is ensuring right procedure for full machine shut down and
avoid unexpected machine start-up, therefore all energy sources need to have Switch-off & Lock capabilities.
Page 5 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Special requirements for Full Body Access (operator) are given in this book in order to ensure that machine
cannot be restarted with people inside the guarded area.
The use of this book is mostly intended for Engineers in charge of (remediation) design (Electrical, Pneumatic
and Hydraulic).
Typically, works are executed by trained personnel from Maintenance department or by competent external
System Integrator under supervision of Project manager.
This book gives provisions about validation process of safety functions in accordance with EN ISO 13849-
2:2015
The purpose of the Validation process is ensuring machine changes and SRP/CS implementation meet the
requirements.
During that process, the Safety Functions are tested to ensure that they work properly.
The Safety Functions are tested in normal condition and under fault conditions according to standard
requirements.
The use of this book is mostly intended for Engineers in charge of (remediation) design (Electrical, Mechanical,
Pneumatic and Hydraulic).
The Validation checklist can be written by design engineers as the checklist came from the SRS. However,
checks and tests shall be executed by competent personnel not involved in design stage (e.g. Maintenance
Personnel)
This book explains the main health and safety requirements for a machinery to be put into service in the EU
market.
All machines produced for EU market require CE marking and related documentation.
All machine changes need proof of correct changes updating the Technical File.
However, the manufacturer is not obliged to deliver elements from the related technical file to customer.
Therefore, in addition to the mandatory documentation required by CE marking rules, MARS Site Purchase
Office shall include in its Request For Quotation at least the delivery of the followings documents:
Page 6 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Remark:
The outlined process here below shall be applied also to new machines from different OEMs put together by Mars
personnel and/or SI to create a production line.
In the case of this process has been already done and documentation is available for each single machines, it will be
necessary to apply again such process but only on the machine connection points. The same in the case of assembly
of existing machines or existing and new machines.
Otherwise, application of this process shall be done on each machine AND connection point in order to cover all the
line production.
On the risk assessment, the determination of limits of machinery part shall define exactly where each machine begins
and finishes.
Step 2: Choice and Definition of Guarding measures to reduce adequately too high risks.
Book 6.3 Machine Guarding requirements
Page 7 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Refer to Book 6.7 CE-Marking & Documentation for additional info about documentation delivery concept.
Where applicable, depending on the nature of the intervention and SI involvement level, MARS Request For Quotation
shall include total or part of the following documents:
Statement of conformity to international standards and or local standards/rules
Updating of original Use and Maintenance Manuals and/or schematics (electrical, pneumatic…)
Risk assessment report
Safety requirement specifications related to the safety functions installed on the machinery
Performance Level calculations of those safety functions.
Validation checklist.
Page 8 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Machine/Machinery definition:
Assembly, fitted with or intended to be fitted with a drive system consisting of linked parts or components, at least one
of which moves, and which are joined together for a specific application.
The term “machinery” also covers an assembly of machines which, in order to achieve the same end, are arranged
and controlled so that they function as an integral whole.
The requirements for E-stop apply to all machines, with exception to:
• machines where an emergency stop would not reduce the risk;
• hand-held or hand-operated machines.
The emergency stop function shall be available and operational at all times. It shall override all other functions and
operations in all operating modes of the machine without impairing other protective functions.
In other words, except on rare cases, even if the E-stop function is a complementary protective measure, all
machinery shall have at least an emergency stop function.
Page 9 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Page 10 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Page 11 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
EN 12267:2003+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Circular saw machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 12268:2014 Food processing machinery - Band saw machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 12331:2015 Food processing machinery - Mincing machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 12463:2014 Food processing machinery - Filling machines and auxiliary machines - Safety and hygiene
requirements
EN 12505:2000+A1:2009 Food processing machinery - Centrifugal machines for processing edible oils and fats - Safety and
hygiene requirements
EN 12852:2001+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Food processors and blenders - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 12854:2003+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Beam mixers - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 12855:2003+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Rotating bowl cutters - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 13570:2005+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Mixing machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 13870:2015 Food processing machinery - Portion cutting machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 13871:2014 Food processing machinery - Cubes cutting machinery - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 13885:2005+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Clipping machines - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 13954:2005+A1:2010 Food processing machinery - Bread slicers - Safety and hygiene requirements
EN 692:2005+A1:2009 Machine tools - Mechanical presses - Safety
EN 693:2001+A2:2011 Machine tools - Safety - Hydraulic presses
EN 13736:2003+A1:2009 Safety of machine tools - Pneumatic presses
US Standards only
Page 12 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Glossary
ACRONYM Meaning
ANSI American National Standards
AOPD Active Optoelectronic Protecting Device
AOPDDR Active Optoelectronic Protecting Device responsive to Diffuse Refection
CCF Common Cause Failure
CE European Conformity, CE Marking
CEN European Committee for Standardization
DC (AVG) Diagnostic Coverage (Average)
EEA European Economic Area
EN European Standard (harmonised)
ESPE Electro-Sensitive Protective Equipment
EU European Union
FSM Functional Safety Management
FT Fault Tolerance
HRN Hazard Rating Number
LO Likelihood of Occurrence of coming into contact with the hazard
FE Frequency of Exposure
DPH Degree of Possible harm
NP Number of Persons exposed at the risk
ISO International Organization for Standardization
LOTO Lockout-Tagout
MTTFD Mean time to dangerous failure
NFPA National Fire Protection Association
NRTL Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory
OEM Original Equipment Manufacturer
OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration
PFHD Average probability of a dangerous failure per hour
PIPDS Passive Infra-red Protecting Device
PL Performance Level
PLR required Performance Level
PSE Pressure Sensitive Edge
SI Systems Integrator
SIL Safety Integrity Level
SRECS Safety-related electrical control system
SRP/CS Safety Related Part of a Control System
SRS Safety Requirements Specification
STO Safe Torque Off
UL Underwriters Laboratories
Page 13 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Flow Chart
Please note that the flow chart is available as a detailed size A0 poster and also in a simplified A3 (split over multiple pages).
The simplified version is included here as a quick reference.
The outlined process here below shall be applied also to new machines from different OEMs put together by Mars personnel and/or SI to create a production
line. In the case of this process has been already done and documentation is available for each single machines, it will be necessary to apply again such
process but only on the machine connection points. The same in the case of assembly of existing machines or existing and new machines.
Otherwise, application of this process shall be done on each machine AND connection point in order to cover all the line production.
On the risk assessment, the determination of limits of machinery part shall define exactly where each machine begins and finishes.
No
NO: To Safety Design
Project (internal or contracted) to
implement the safety designs
END
YES YES NO
Ensure VENDOR
Follow the Q&A as
supplies
per 6.7 CE Documented Minor
documentation &
MARKING LOTO Procedure Intervention
validate (similar
per 6.7 CE Procedure
MARKING)
YES Satisfied?
Training Department
END
Page 14 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Risk Assesment
Determine the
limits of the Reference Guide:
machinery
BOOK 6.2 RISK
ASSESSMENT
Hazard
Identification
Risk reduction
Risk Reduction corrective measures
Design
Priority for Risk
Reduction Guard
Role Responsibility
The team shall have a team leader. The team leader is fully responsible for
ensuring that all the task involved in planning performing and documenting
Team Leader
the risk assessment are carried out and that the results/recommendation
(1)
are reported to the appropriate person(s)
Risk reduction
corrective measures
Page 15 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Guarding
Reference Guide:
BOOK 6.3 GUARDING
Analysis of the
Hazards and Risk REQUIREMENTS
Reduction Plan
SEE Risk Assesment
Fixed Guards
Can these elements be 6.3.3.1
Fixed Guards made completely NO
6.3.3.1 inaccessible while working? OR
Interlocking
OR movable Guards
Interlocking 6.3.3.2
movable Guards
6.3.3.2
Protective Devices
6.3.4
YES
OR
Fixed Guards
6.3.3.1
OR
Interlocking
movable Guards
6.3.3.2
Guard Design
Role Responsibility
Engineer
Engineer in charge of remediation of the specific hazard
(1 or more)
Page 16 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Safety
Functions
Determine the
required PL
Verification of PL
Is PL > PL(required)
Validation:
Are all
requirements
met?
Safety Function
Designs
Role Responsibility
Engineer
Engineer in charge of remediation of the specific hazard
(1 or more)
Safety Function
Outputs Designs
Page 17 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
LOTO
Keeping a machine in a stopped condition while persons are present in danger zones is
one of the most important conditions of the safe use of machinery and hence one of the
major aims of the machine designer and machine user. Reference Guide:
The risk assessment relating to the presence of persons in a danger zone of a stopped BOOK 6.5 CONTROL OF
machine needs to take into account the probability of an unexpected start-up of the HAZARDOUS ENERGY
hazard-generating elements.
YES
Measures for
isolation & energy LOTO Procedure
dissipation
6.5.3.4
LOTO Design
Role Responsibility
Engineer
Engineer in charge of remediation of the specific hazard
(1 or more)
LOTO Design
Outputs
LOTO Procedure
Training Department
Documented Minor
Intervention
Procedure
Page 18 of 19
Machine Safety Standard - Book 6.1
Validation
The purpose of the validation process is to confirm that the design of each Safety Function
supports the overall safety requirements specification for the machinery
Drawings &
Specifications
Functional
description of circuit
diagram
Time sequence
diagram
Component Lists
Analysis of all
relevant faults
Role Responsibility
Reference Guide:
Engineer Person(s) responsible for carrying out the validation of safety functions BOOK 6.6 VALIDATION
(1 or more) once implemented
Page 19 of 19