Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 12

IPTC 11512

The Application of Unstructured Gridding Techniques for Full Field Simulation of a

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


Giant Carbonate Reservoir Developed With Long Horizontal Wells
H. Vestergaard, SPE, H. Olsen, SPE, and A.S. Sikandar,* SPE, Maersk Oil Qatar, and I.A. Al-Emadi, SPE, and
R. Noman, SPE, Qatar Petroleum

*Now with Schlumberger

Copyright 2007, International Petroleum Technology Conference


The dome shaped reservoir has the thickest oil column of
This paper was prepared for presentation at the International Petroleum Technology typically 23 hydrocarbon-feet at the crest of the field thinning
Conference held in Dubai, U.A.E., 4–6 December 2007.
towards the flank. The field has relatively low permeability
This paper was selected for presentation by an IPTC Programme Committee following review
of information contained in an abstract submitted by the author(s). Contents of the paper, as
ranging from 1-15mD. The developed wells enjoy no pressure
presented, have not been reviewed by the International Petroleum Technology Conference support from the distant flank aquifer and the trapped water
and are subject to correction by the author(s). The material, as presented, does not
necessarily reflect any position of the International Petroleum Technology Conference, its present in the central part of the field is not in communication
officers, or members. Papers presented at IPTC are subject to publication review by Sponsor
Society Committees of IPTC. Electronic reproduction, distribution, or storage of any part of this
with deeper layers. Oil gravity in the field varies significantly
paper for commercial purposes without the written consent of the International Petroleum from saturated with low viscosity (<1 cP) to highly
Technology Conference is prohibited. Permission to reproduce in print is restricted to an
abstract of not more than 300 words; illustrations may not be copied. The abstract must undersaturated with relatively high viscosity (35 cP). The field
contain conspicuous acknowledgment of where and by whom the paper was presented. Write
Librarian, IPTC, P.O. Box 833836, Richardson, TX 75083-3836, U.S.A., fax 01-972-952-9435.
has several local gas caps and a free water level dipping more
than 500 ft across the field.
Abstract
This paper presents a case history on reservoir simulation The reservoir was at the time of the study developed with 75
modelling of a giant, complex, low permeability, carbonate ultra long horizontal wells of up to 30,000 ft total length
reservoir which has been completed with many long drilled in alternating producer injector patterns from 5
horizontal wells. The lateral magnitude of the Al Shaheen different platform locations. Production from the field started
field in Qatar and the multiple radial layout of the 75 very in 1994 and secondary recovery by water injection
long horizontal wells in the field posed a challenge in commenced in 1997.
modelling of individual well performance using a manageable
grid size with an acceptable run time for history matching. The Continuing evaluation of reservoir performance and
gridding dilemma was solved by use of 2.5-D PEBI grids assessment of further development potential of the field
around each individual wellbore. This allowed for sufficient prompted the need for detailed history matching on a full field
resolution between wells and also aligned the grid with the basis. The modelling issues discussed in this paper were part
well paths thereby avoiding grid non-orthogonality issues. of a history matching study completed in 2004 which formed
the basis to further develop the reservoir with additional 89
The initial fluid distribution and wettability dependent flow wells to infill existing well patterns and to develop the thinner
properties added further complexity to the reservoir simulation oil column towards the flank of the reservoir.
model. This paper describes how tilting free water levels,
separate gas caps and large lateral variations of oil properties
across the field were captured in the initialisation of the 2. Background
simulation model. Dynamic flow properties in the reservoir
are heavily dependent on wettability and oil properties and the 2.1. Geology
paper describes the rigorous implementation of a complex The Kharaib B formation is a laterally continuous limestone of
petrophysical model in the reservoir simulation model by use Late Cretaceous age and the reservoir has a relatively constant
of endpoint scaling. thickness of some 80 ft within the Block 5 area. The lower
water bearing part is mud-dominated with poorer rock
1. Introduction properties whereas the upper oil bearing units are coarser
grained.
The reservoir in subject is a major carbonate reservoir in the
Al Shaheen field [Reference 1] in Block 5 offshore Qatar, A vertically cyclic nature with low porosity zones interbedded
covering an area of some 2080 km2. The Kharaib Formation between the main reservoir units with higher porosity is
forms part of the Lower Cretaceous Thamama Group that is characteristic for this formation. The permeability is in the
widely present in the Southern Arabian Gulf. range 1-15 mD.
2 IPTC 11512

2.2. Oil Properties 2.3 Fluid Contacts


Oil properties vary significantly across the laterally extensive The general trend of the active Kharaib B free water level
reservoir. The API gravity ranges from 38° at the crest of the (FWL) surface is to dip towards Northeast. This is most likely
field to 12° at the northern flank. The large variation is caused by hydrodynamic effects. The FWL varies by more
understood to be due to biodegradation and multiple migration than 500 ft across the reservoir and the dip causes the oil
phases which combined with the low permeability resulted in column to be positioned some 250 ft deeper in the North-
the lack of equilibrium across the field. Reservoir oil samples eastern part (Figure 2).
and oils extracted from cuttings from a large number of wells

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


were geochemically analysed to characterize the oil and
determine the lateral distribution of oil gravity across Block 5
(Figure 1).

Figure 2: Kharaib B Free Water Level map

The FWL is modelled with the Equivalent Radius (EQR)


saturation height Model [Reference 2, 3] which is matched to
Figure 1: Map of API Gravity. the logged saturations in the wells. Due to the short transition
zone, the modelled water saturation is very sensitive to the
In addition to oil gravity variations, the saturation pressure depth of the FWL.
varies from saturated near the gas caps to 1300 psi
undersaturated in low API areas. There is not, however, a In the northern and eastern part of Block 5 the lower part of
distinct correlation between saturation pressure and API Kharaib B contains a zone of residual oil that is modelled as
gravity. The large variation in saturation pressure means that the remains of a larger palaeo oil column that subsequently
different natural drive mechanisms will be predominant in has been reduced, leaving behind immobile residual oil. The
different areas of the reservoir. residual oil column is modelled by use of a separate palaeo
FWL [Reference 3].
In areas with saturated oil the pressure will drop below the
saturation pressure almost from onset of production which Gas oil contacts (GOC) have been identified at different levels
results in significant gas production reducing oil production in the Kharaib B in separate structural closures at depths
potential. These areas are however mostly characterized by varying up to 40 ft.
low viscosity oil in the order of 1 cP, hence water flooding
will yield almost piston like displacement. In areas with low 2.4 Dynamic parameters
saturation pressure and high viscosity there is a lack of natural The petrophysical model for Kharaib B is based on the
drive. The high mobility ratio during water flood in these areas concept that the current rock wettability is a function of its
will result in a more unstable displacement process. saturation history. The wettability is expressed as a function of
the maximum saturation experienced in the reservoir. This
As the field is developed with ultra long horizontal wells the maximum oil saturation is determined by the derived palaeo
viscosity along the length of the wells could change by up to a free water level that is up to 50 ft deeper than the active FWL.
factor of 10, hence detailed representation of variation in oil Increasing maximum oil saturation makes the Kharaib B
properties is essential for accurate modelling of short and long carbonates less water wet and more oil wet as the pore fabric
term well performance. comes in contact with more oil. The wettability alteration
IPTC 11512 3

impacts the flow properties of fluids with water becoming The initial fluid distribution is heavily influenced by capillary
more mobile as the rock becomes more oil wet. forces. The tilting FWL, separate gas caps, large variation in
oil properties and the wettability dependent flow
2.5 Well pattern and production history characteristics furthermore poses a challenge in the
The field is developed with long horizontal wells with an initialisation and dynamic modelling of the reservoir.
average horizontal length of some 19,000 ft while the longest
wells having up to 25,000 ft of reservoir section. In total, the
75 wells intersect more than 450 km of reservoir target. Most 3. Initialisation of Simulation Models

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


of the horizontal development wells are drilled radially away
from the platform locations in an alternating producer/injector Factors controlling the initial fluid distribution in the Kharaib
pattern. Furthermore, wells drilled from different platform B vary significantly across the field. These effects must be
locations complement each other in developing the inter- incorporated into the simulation models since they strongly
platform areas in the desired alternating producer/injector affect the prediction of oil volume and production
patterns (Figure 3). performance. The tilting FWL, the different GOC’s and the oil
property variations makes it necessary to break the field into a
number of equilibration regions with similar FWL, GOC, oil
density and saturation pressure.

3.1 Implementation Method


PVT properties indicate multiple filling events and varying
degrees of biodegradation. In order to capture the significant
variation in oil properties across the reservoir the oil properties
were discretised into 9 different regions based on mapping of
saturation pressure and API gravity, assigning a different oil
type to each PVT region. The oil properties within each
individual grid cell were then captured in sufficient detail by
assigning an initial saturation pressure together with the
relevant oil type (PVT region).

The most important parameter affecting the initial fluid


distribution is the FWL, which displays a tilt in excess of 500
feet across the reservoir. Oil gravity varies by at least 18 °API.
A discretisation of the variations across the modelled area has
been based on the following tolerances (Table 1):

Parameter Discretisation step


Free water level 3 feet
Figure 3: 2004 Kharaib B well location map. Gas oil contact 2 feet
Saturation Pressure 50 psi
The field started production in 1994 and water injection was Table 1 : Discretisation used for initialisation of simulation
initiated in 1997.
Low tolerances have been selected for the contacts since the
At the time of history matching in 2004 the horizontal wells reservoir is only 80 feet thick. Combining the individual PVT
originated from 5 platform locations. Most production had at regions with the discretised contacts and saturation pressures a
the time of history matching been drawn from the crest of the total of 2300 to 2900 equilibration regions are required,
field. Water injection was also first introduced in this central depending on grid layout. Implementation of a non-
area. equilibrium situation did not have any noticeable impact on
the stability of the simulation model.
2.6 Summary
The Kharaib B reservoir has an aspect ratio of ca. 1:1,000, and The oil in place in the simulation model was within 1%
is a thin, widespread, low permeability reservoir. The radial accuracy of the detailed geological model and the logged
well pattern combined with the magnitude of the field posed a water saturation in appraisal and development wells was
challenge in generating a simulation grid that would provide matched by the simulation model. The method is hence
sufficient resolution between wells. The inner part of the wells capable of representing the fluids in place accurately.
are typically some 500 ft apart requiring relatively fine
gridding in order to model the saturation changes between
water injectors and producers. The distal sections of the wells
are typically some 3,000 ft apart, which therefore require less
grid resolution.
4 IPTC 11512

4. Relative Permeabilities and Capillary Pressure


-
Oil -Water Relative Permeability End Points Correlations
The current wettability of the Kharaib B reservoir is modelled Required Variables

to be a function of its previous oil saturation history. For the Palaeo FWL FWL Porosity .
major part of the upper section of the Kharaib B accumulation
the oil saturations exceed 80-85% and the reservoir becomes Capillary Pressure Entry Capillary Pressure Irreducible / Critical water saturation

more oil wet. The relative permeability characteristics are Pc = f (HAFWL, Rho) Pce = f (Porosity, facies) Swir, Swcr = f(phi)

affected by oil wettability.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


MaximumKrw
EQR for both
(Palaeo& Active) EQR = PCE/PC Krwmax = f(Krwow,Krwww,Krwinit
)

The saturation-height model of the carbonate reservoir is


based on the Equivalent Radius Model EQR [Reference 2, 3] Water Saturation
(Palaeo& Active) Sw = f (EQR)
Krwow =f(sorwwat)
and Hg injection capillary pressure SCAL data were used to Only PalaeoSw
carried forward
define shape curves used for modelling of the fluid saturation. Maximum P
( alaeo)
HC Saturation Shp,Shmax= 1-SW Krwww =f(Sorwwat)
The drainage capillary pressure curves were used to derive the
Harvey-AmottWettabilityIndex
initial fluid distribution together with the FWL and GOC AWI = f(SW) Krwinit = f( AWI)
maps.
Sor for a water-wet carbonate Sorww f (Phi,Shmax,Swir
)
Multiple saturation functions have been applied to reflect the
different wettability conditions. Reservoir sections
Sor from a water-flood expt. Sorw(wat) f (AWI,Sorww)
experiencing palaeo oil saturations higher than 80% become
increasingly oil wet, and Corey exponents for oil relative
permeability curves increase from 2.25 to 4 while water TrueSor after inf. Water-flood Sorwf f (Sorwf>Shmax) thenShmaxelse Sorwf

exponents drop from 5 to around 3 (Figure 4). Furthermore the Sor for a water-wet carbonate Nowi=
No = f (AWI)

remaining oil saturation tends to decrease as the wettability Sowcr = f(Sorwf) Sorwix = f (Sorwf,AWI,Sw)
Kro(Swir/Swcr
) = 1 (definition)
Nwi =f= (AWI)
Nw f (AWI)

changes from water wet to oil wet. Krw(Sorwf) = Krwmax

Water & Oil Corey functions,


Kro(Swir) and Krw(Sorwf)

Figure 5: Schematic of endpoint definition workflow.


Corey Exponent, Kharaib B Formation

6 Only the normalized saturation functions were binned in


No
Nw
classes. The endpoints were provided on a cell by cell basis
5 and allowed for a detailed modelling of the petrophysical
characteristics. Since the reservoir rock was modelled as two
4
types with respect to Pc-characteristics, a total of about 50 sets
C orey E xponents

of primary drainage Kr-Pc curves were required and the


3
imbibition process was modelled through an additional 80
curves.
2

1
The implementation of the Kr-Pc model was defined by 3
steps:
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1. Calculate and group normalized saturation functions
Palaeo Hydrocarbon Saturation
2. Calculate endpoint data on a cell by cell basis
3. Assign saturation function groups to the individual grid
Figure 4: Corey exponent as a function of palaeo hydrocarbon
saturation
cells.

In order to rigorously implement the complex wettability Killoughs hysteresis [Reference 4] between the drainage and
dependent petrophysical model in the simulation model imbibition processes was applied for the non-wetting phase in
endpoint scaling was employed to conveniently scale relative order to model the dependence of relative permeabilities on
permeability and capillary pressure curves to key parameters, the saturation path and history.
such as Swir, Sorw and Krw@Sorw on a grid cell basis. A
workflow was set up to define the oil-water endpoints in the The described petrophysical model was important for the
model based on unit type, porosity and saturation history history match. In particular the matching of formation
(wettability) as depicted in Figure 5. pressures along the long horizontal wells was a key to history
matching since significant variations in flow properties along
the wells were observed. Matching of logged swept zones
from water injectors further provided confidence in the
reservoir/petrophysical model since no breakthrough from a
water injector to a producer had been observed at the time of
history matching to validate modelling of the flood front.
IPTC 11512 5

Performance of the 75 production and injection wells was 5.2 Normal Cartesian Gridding
modelled with the described reservoir simulation model by use At the onset of the study, a coarse grid model with a regular
of the rock curves as defined by the petrophysical model. Cartesian grid was generated for the Kharaib B reservoir. The
grid was based on a lateral resolution of 500 ft by 500 ft and
5. Gridding Challenges had 14 layers resulting in a 156 x 249 x 14 model (505,249
active grid cells). Vertical cell thicknesses varied between 2
5.1 Background of Gridding Techniques and 15 feet. The model size was considered to be manageable
The geometry of oil fields, fault compartments and well from a run time perspective and therefore well suited for

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


patterns do not follow the strict requirements of finite initial gridding investigations.
difference method based simulators of approximating the
space discretisation using orthogonal axes. A step closer to Reservoir simulation was performed with each well being
allowing finer discretisation (and subsequently higher constrained by historical subsurface voidage rates.
resolution) was made with the introduction of local grid
refinements (LGRs) in simulation grids around features of Relative permeability and capillary pressure curves were
interest, especially wells [Reference 5]. While local grid applied as rock curves. In theory, it would be possible to
refinement techniques aim to solve a given problem with less pseudoise the relative permeability curves to compensate for
grid blocks than conventional fine grids, the use of nine point the shortcomings of the coarse grid. However, the wells are
scheme aimed to reduce the grid orientation effect with drilled radially, so the flow intersects the regular grid at all
adverse affects on computation costs [Reference 6]. The angles. Furthermore, the relative permeability and fluid
limitation of being able to fully accommodate the location of characteristics vary significantly within the area, so a
natural features or well trajectories still remained unattainable. pseudoisation would result in an impractical number of curves,
and therefore this approach was not pursued.
It was not until the 1980’s that the use of Voronoi grids in
reservoir simulation was introduced [Reference 7, 8]. The
technique essentially allows flow simulations on grids based
on aggregation of triangles within user-defined domains;
Cartesian grids then become a particular case of such a general
scheme of unstructured grids. The name Voronoi is in honour
of the mathematician (Voronoi, 1908) who first defined these
polygonal regions. Other names used for such grids in the
literature are Wigner-Seitz cells, Dirichlet tesselation, PEBI
cells, and polygons of influence. In this paper, these cells are
referred to as PEBI cells (PErpendicular BIsection).

Due to the flexibility allowed by PEBI cells, these types of Well 1


grids have found their niche in allowing the reservoir Well 3
simulation grid to seamlessly (and more exactly) represent the
geometry of features such as deviated or horizontal well, faults
and reservoir boundaries [Reference 9]. The grids are
applicable to multi-layered, multi-phase full field simulation
Well 2
where heterogeneity and anisotropy can be large.

In simple terms, a typical PEBI grid may be made up of


individual domain grids that surround features of interest,
glued together by a bulk grid that discretises the remaining Figure 6: 500 ft Cartesian Grid with well traces for 3 wells
volume of interest. Two major unstructured discretisation overlaid.
schemes are available:
1. Full 3-D that allows PEBI cells in all directions to be Figure 6 shows an example with a subset of 3 wells in the
generated. This may not preserve the vertical layering coarse 500 ft by 500 ft grid. The grid cannot be aligned with
provided by the geological model and usually incurs high all wells since they are drilled radially from the platform
computation costs. location. The figure shows that as a consequence of the coarse
2. 2.5-D PEBI grids allow PEBI cells to be created in (I,J) gridding only 0-2 grid cells are separating Well 1 and Well 2.
directions only while preserving the vertical layering, Furthermore, the distance between the wells in the simulation
which is the scheme that was used for this study. model becomes somewhat distorted as a result of the grid size.
6 IPTC 11512

Actual versus Grid Well Distances


model as a consequence of the coarse gridding (Figure 8). At
around 9,000 ft MD where the distance between wells dropped
3000
from 1,000 ft to 500 ft the pressure in the model suddenly
2500
dropped 250 psi whereas the actual formation pressure showed
a smooth increase in pressure of some 75 psi per 1,000 ft. A
similar problem occurred at the tail end of the well where the
Well Distances [ft]

2000

pressure fluctuated by 100 psi in the model whereas the actual


1500
formation pressure was almost constant.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


1000
A similar example can be shown for one of the most important
500 wells in the history matching process, Well 6 in Figure 9. The
pressures at the tail end of the well shows the pressure
0
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 propagation from one of the first water injection wells (Well
Well MD [ft] 5) in the field.
WELL1_Grid WELL1_Actual WELL3_Grid WELL3_Actual

Figure 7: Actual distance between wells versus simulation model


derived distances.

Figure 7 shows the actual distance from the central well (Well
2) to the two surrounding wells calculated from the well traces
(smooth lines), while the step functions represent the distances
between the grid cells intersected by the wells in the 500 ft
Well 6
simulation model. The difference between actual and grid cell Infill Producer
distances can be up to 500 ft for both wells which is
significant in the inner section of the radial well pattern and in
areas with wells spaced at around 1,000 ft. Well 7

Distributed formation pressures obtained in development wells


drilled after start of production were one of the key history Well 4
matching parameters. These pressures provided important Well 5 Water Injector
information in this field completed with long horizontal wells,
since it was possible to determine differential depletion
resulting from production/injection in nearby wells along the
entire length of the wells. This was in particular important in
Kharaib B where the oil viscosity varies significantly along
the length of a well, causing fluids to be predominantly Figure 9: 500 ft Cartesian Grid with well traces for 4 wells overlaid
withdrawn from the low viscosity areas first.
Figure 10 shows that at the tail end of Well 6 the distance to
the injector (Well 5) is oscillating between 500 ft and 1,000 ft.
Actual versus Grid Well Distances This varying distance to the water injector caused the resulting
3000 1500
modelled pressures for the subject well to oscillate by up to
100 psi.
2500 1400
Well Distances [ft]

2000 1300
Pressure

1500 1200

1000 1100

500 1000

0 900
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000

Well MD [ft]

WELL1_Grid Distance WELL1_Actual Distance Pressure Model Logged Pressure

Figure 8: Actual distance between wells versus simulation model


derived distances with model and actual formation pressures.

Take the example of the 3 wells presented before (Figure 6).


The pressure obtained from the simulation model showed
strong influence of the reduced distance between wells in the
IPTC 11512 7

The results from the different models could subsequently be


Actual versus Grid Well Distances combined to provide a fine-grid modelling of the field.
3000 1900

An area of investigation was selected for the 500 ft model


2500 1800
covering around 1/5 of the wells in the reservoir. The area
around the first developed wells in the field was chosen to
Well Distances [ft]

2000 1700

investigate the effect of increasing the grid resolution between

Pressure
1500 1600
wells. This was done with 3 different local grids having an

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


1000 1500
increasing resolution of the grid around the wellbores with
500 1400
lateral grid refinements of 2x2, 3x3 and 4x4, respectively
(Table 2). The 4x4 LGR grid model required 4 parallel
0
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000
1300
18000 processors on a 64 bit cluster to handle the memory
Well MD [ft]
requirements.
WELL4_Grid WELL4_Actual WELL7_Grid WELL7_Actual
WELL5_Grid WELL5_Actual Logged Pressure Model Pressure
Sim. Model Coarse 2x2 3x3 4x4
Figure 10: Actual distance between wells versus simulation model grid LGR LGR LGR
derived distances with model and actual measured pressures. Cell size
500 ft 250 ft 167 ft 125 ft
around wells
The production performance was also influenced by the coarse No. of active
505,249 560,745 630,115 727,233
grid (Figure 11). Laterally large grid cells were inadequate for grid cells
modelling of coning of water from below despite the fine
vertical grid resolution. The example shows a well coning Table 2: Parameters for coarse and LGR grids.
water almost from the onset of production with the water cut
Reservoir and fluid properties for the LGRs were inherited
reaching 20% towards the end of the modelled period. The
from the original coarse grid model without modifications.
coarse grid model produced no water from the well causing an
overestimation of cumulative oil production of 15% after 8.5
years of production.

Actual Watercut

Modelled watercut

Figure 11: Well production performance in coarse grid.

5.3 Local Grid Refinement around wells Figure 12: 2x 2 LGR grids in confined area of investigation.
The 500 ft model hence proved inadequate to model the
individual well behaviour due to the lack of grid resolution Figure 12 shows the 2x2 LGR around all wells in the area of
between wells. Creating a fine grid model to allow for at least investigation. The whole area is essentially a 250 ft grid with
3 grid cells between wells would require grid dimensions of all the LGR areas around the wells being amalgamated. The
only 200 ft or less. This translates into a full field model with inner part of the wells is though in a few instances still only
some 3 MM grid cells. Such a large model was considered separated by 1 grid cell. Further refinement of the grid
inefficient for history matching purposes due to the significant mitigates the problem, at the cost of additional memory
run-time and memory requirements. requirements and run-time.

Alternatively, a number of models could be built with local


grid refinements (LGR) only in separate parts of the field,
while the remaining area in each model would be modelled by
a coarser 500 ft grid to ensure realistic boundary conditions.
8 IPTC 11512

5.4 Full Field model based on PEBI grid.


The PEBI gridding technique was then applied to investigate
the feasibility of this alternative modelling approach.

Perpendicular bisector cells (PEBI) were adopted to grid


laterally around the wells. The PEBI grid was aligned with the
well paths (Figure 15). For each well a local domain grid was
created which for the main part had 3 grid cells each 150 ft

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


orthogonal to the well.

Figure 13: Well water coning performance in different simulation


grids.

Figure 13 shows historic well performance as simulated from


the coarse 500 ft model with an increasing amount of LGR
cells around the well bores. The water cut performance of the
well showed a high degree of dependency on the number of
grid cells around the wells in the model. The 500 ft coarse grid
model did not produce any water, while the water cut
progressively increased as the number of grid cells around the
well were increased. The 4x4 grid refinement, i.e. 125 ft grid
cells, yielded a water cut rising to around 20% in line with the Figure 15: Subset of PEBI grid showing near wellbore grid
actual well data. resolution

This ensured that the flow path between all producer-injector


pairs was always modelled by at least 6 grid cells, while
slightly higher number of cells were used when well spacing
increased. Simulation of variation in reservoir and fluid
properties along the wellbore required less grid resolution and
the cell size along the well path was set to 300 ft.

Figure 14: Well BHP performance in different simulation grids

The flowing bottom hole pressure (BHP) was also found to be


sensitive to the degree of grid refinement, with the fine grid
models predicting bottom hole pressures up 200 psi lower than
the coarse grid model (Figure 14). Similar observations were
made for most wells in the LGR area.

Figure 16: Full Field Model PEBI grid


IPTC 11512 9

The underlying grid was divided into two regions. An outer Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production
region with limited hydrocarbons mapped was constructed 1900

with lateral grid dimensions of 1500 ft by 1500 ft and the


1800
central region used grid dimensions of 500 ft by 500 ft (Figure
16). The resulting grid had some 760 x 154 x 14 cells 1700

(1,638,560) of which around 700,000 were active in dynamic

Pressure (psia)
simulation i.e. around 28% more active grid cells than the 500 1600

ft Cartesian grid model.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


1500

Reservoir and fluid properties and their distribution across the 1400

field were unaltered compared to the original coarse grid


model. 1300

1200
5.4.1 Results from PEBI Grid Model 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
MD (ft)
The PEBI grid model was used for reservoir simulation with Logged Pressure PEBI Model Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure
each well being controlled by reservoir voidage rates.
Figure 18: Well 6 Comparison of pressures; Actual formation
Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production pressures, 500 ft Cartesian model and PEBI grid model.
1500

1400
The same was seen for the pressure response from the water
injector observed in infill Well 6 (Figure 9). The PEBI grid
1300
resulted in a smooth pressure curve at the tail end of the well
Pressure (psia)

1200
reflecting where the well was opposite to the water injector,
whereas the coarse grid model oscillated by 100 psi due to the
1100 varying distance to the injector caused by the non-alignment
of the wells with the grid. The pressure profile was smooth at
1000
the inner section of the well in the 500 ft grid as the distance
900
to the nearest well was almost constant, since the well trace
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
MD (ft)
14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000
intersected the grid along the cell diagonals. The outer part of
Logged Pressure PEBI Model Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure the well on the contrary is zigzagging through the grid cells
which results in the step wise changes in distance to the
Figure 17: Well 2 Comparison of pressures; Actual formation nearby well affecting the modelled pressures.
pressures, 500 ft Cartesian model and PEBI grid model.

The grid being aligned with the wells and having at least 6 Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production
grid cells between wells allowed for more accurate modelling 1900
of the field performance. The model pressure profiles became
smooth as the gradually increasing well distances were now 1800

exactly matched with the PEBI grid. Figure 17 shows a 1700

comparison of the pressure profile shown for the 500 ft coarse


Pressure (psia)

1600
grid Cartesian model together with the profile obtained from
the PEBI grid. The PEBI grid model was able to reproduce the 1500

smooth increase in formation pressure as observed in the


1400
actual data with a maximum of 50 psi difference.
1300

1200
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Logged Pressure PEBI Model MD (ft)
Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure
LGR 2x2 LGR 3x3 LGR 4x4

Figure 19: Well 6 Comparison of pressures; Actual formation


pressures, 500 ft Cartesian model, LGR models and PEBI grid
model.

Figure 19 shows a comparison of the pressure profile shown


for the 500 ft Cartesian model and the LGR cases together
with the profile obtained from the PEBI grid. The refined grid
cases still revealed the impact of the grid imposed varying
distance between the wells at the tail end of the well. The
oscillation of the pressure profile reduced from 100 psi to 50
10 IPTC 11512

psi for the 2x2 LGR grid. The 3x3 local grid refinement to poor grid resolution and non-alignment of wells.
reduced the oscillation to 30 psi while the 4x4 LGR reduced it Furthermore, it resolved the issues of modelling bottom-water
further to 25 psi. Even though the oscillation in the 4x4 grid is coning and flood front advancement between injectors and
small it is still a distortion of the results caused by gridding producers since the grid size was reduced around the wells
effects. where the large pressure drops and saturation changes
occurred, while still maintaining a reasonable model size. This
The matching of pressure profiles was critical for this approach also met the requirement for conducting history
reservoir with long horizontal wells. The capability of match runs using a full field model with a reasonable run-time,

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


modelling the large changes to flow properties along the well and issues relating to the merging of results from different
bores, partly governed by the variation in saturation pressure, sector models and boundary conditions were eliminated.
was one of the most important factors to obtaining a history
match of the performance of the reservoir. Several advantages of PEBI grids were identified:

1. Ability to grid around geological features and well


locations while honouring their locations exactly.
2. Exact modelling of inter-well distances, which was
essential for history matching dynamic pressure profiles
along horizontal wells.
3. The need for local grid refinements (LGRs) diminished.
Fewer number of active cells in the grid saved computation
costs.
4. The need for pseudoised relative permeability curves was
effectively reduced or even removed due to the dedicated
high resolution gridding around all wells.
5. Discretisation around features independent of the
surrounding cells to improve model fluid flow.

There are, however, some drawbacks that were encountered


during the study:
1. The grids used for history matching were not readily
Figure 20: Comparison of well performance; Actual, 500 ft adaptable for prediction runs if the new wells required
Cartesian model and PEBI grid model. unstructured grid domains around them.
2. Non-intuitiveness when modifications were needed to be
The coning of water in the PEBI grid from below was in most carried out on static or well connection properties due to
wells similar to the results from the 4x4 LGR grids (Figure 20) the unstructured character of the PEBI grid.
whereas the 3x3 and 2x2 LGR grids underestimated the water 3. Existing linear solvers in reservoir simulators are not
cut. In a few cases the water production was higher for the 4x4 efficient at handling PEBI grids. Despite the fact that no
LGR grid case than for the PEBI grid case. Modelling of numerical convergence errors were reported, costs of a
coning of water from below was primarily dependent on the Newton iteration compared to a Cartesian grid with
actual grid size rather than the distance to other wells. similar grid cell sizes were high.

More important for the crestal area of the field was modelling On balance, the benefits associated with the use of PEBI grids
of the progression of the flood front between injectors and for this reservoir outweighed the disadvantages of this
producers where the distance between wells was critical to approach.
ensure correct modelling of break through time and water cut
development. At the time of history matching, water
breakthrough from an injector had however not occurred and
could not be included in the history match. The advancement
of a flood front was as part of the reservoir characterisation
matched to a logged swept zone close to a water injector.

5.4.2 Summary of the Use of PEBI Grids for Full Field


Modelling

The problem of non-alignment of wells with the grid and the


lack of resolution between wells in a manageable Cartesian
grid was effectively solved with the 2.5-D PEBI gridding
along the well path. The use of well aligned PEBI grids
enabled accurate matching of formation pressures without
having the distance between wells distorted in the model due
IPTC 11512 11

6. Simulation Performances 7. Conclusion

As discussed in the previous sections, the history matching of This case story shows how the history matching requirements
the Kharaib B reservoir required a model with a fine grid for a giant low relief carbonate reservoir, completed with a
resolution to capture the main flow paths and drive large number of horizontal wells drilled in irregular
mechanisms in the reservoir to be able to model field and producer/injector patterns with complex initial fluid
individual well performance to a sufficient degree of accuracy. distribution and flow characteristics led to the selection of a
However, the run time of the model had to be manageable to simulation model based on the PEBI gridding technique.

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


allow for a large number of sensitivities to characterise the
reservoir.
1. The application of PEBI grids around the long horizontal
wells allowed for sufficiently refined cells between wells
Coarse Coarse + 1/5 refined drilled in radial patterns and accurate representation of
LGR LGR LGR PEBI intra well distances without compromising run-time.
Cartesian
2x2 3x3 4x4
Active cells 2. The numerical performance of the Full Field PEBI model
505 561 630 727 698
[*1,000] having fine resolution around all 75 wells was similar to
Grid dimens. that of a 4x4 LGR model covering only 1/5 of the wells.
500 250 167 125 150
[ft]
Memory 3. Advanced initialisation technique was required to
2.1 2.4 2.7 3.0 3.9 incorporate a complex initial fluid distribution in the
Req. [GB]
Newton Iter. 1,312 2,360 2,473 2,699 1,395 reservoir simulation model. This included an accurate
Linear Iter. 5,613 11,048 13,420 16,112 14,868 representation of the tilting FWLs, separate gas caps and
large lateral oil property variations.
Lin./Newton 4.3 4.7 5.4 6.0 10.7
iter. (avg)
4. The use of endpoint scaling on a grid cell basis combined
CPU time 1.1 2.5 4.3 6.9 6.5 with normalised saturation functions allowed for rigorous
[hours]
implementation of complex petrophysical properties of the
Table 3: Summary of simulation performance for different grids. reservoir. The petrophysical model reflects the concept that
the current rock wettability is strongly dependent on the
Table 3 shows the size and performance of the models created previous oil saturation history (palaeo) and that the rock
for the study. All simulations were run on Linux machines properties in turn are strongly dependent on wettability.
with 4 nodes x 2 CPU AMD Opteron chips with 8 GB of
memory each. The CPU times given are from 4 way parallel
runs with all models having identical numerical settings. History matching of this complex reservoir has allowed a
systematic evaluation of the existing development strategy,
CPU consumption varied from 1.1 to 6.9 hours for simulation and evaluation of a range of further development options. The
of the 10 years of field history. The PEBI model was 6 times next stage of development of this carbonate reservoir,
slower than the original coarse grid model, but the runtime involving 89 horizontal wells, is now in progress.
was similar to that of the LGR 4x4 case. All LGR cases had
refined grids only around 20% of the wells, whereas the PEBI Acknowledgements
model provided sufficient resolution around all wells The authors wish to thank Qatar Petroleum and Maersk Oil
independent of location or orientation. The PEBI model Qatar AS for permission to publish this paper.
thereby proved to be an efficient tool for history matching the
Kharaib B reservoir with acceptable run-times.

Reports on numerical performance showed, that the number of References


Newton iterations was similar for the coarse grid Cartesian 1. Thomasen, J., Al-Emadi, I.A., Noman, R., Øgelund, N.P.,
model and PEBI model, while the LGR cases required more Damgaard, A.: “Realizing the Potential of Marginal Reservoirs : The
iterations. However, the ratio between linear and Newton Al Shaheen Field Offshore Qatar”, paper IPTC 10854-MS presented
at the 2005 International Petroleum Technology Conference, Doha
iterations was significantly higher for the PEBI (10.7) than for
(2005).
the models based on Cartesian grids with LGRs (4.3 – 6.0). 2. Engstroem F.: ”A new method to Normalise Capillary Pressure
This relates to the available generation of solvers, which were Curves” paper 9535 presented at the 1995 International Symposium
originally designed for structured grids. There are, however, of the Society of Core Analysts, San Fransisco (1995).
new solvers that show promise of efficient handling of such 3. Engstroem F. Toft JC.: ”Experiences Using EQR Modelling for
models [Reference 10]. Saturation Predictions in a Middle East Carbonate Reservoir” paper
IPTC-10878 presented at the 2005 International Petroleum
Technology Conference, Doha (2005).
4. Killough, J.E.: “Reservoir Simulation with History-dependent
Saturation Functions”, Trans. AIME 261, page 37-48 (1976).
12 IPTC 11512

5. Pedrosa, O. A., and Aziz, K., “Use of Hybrid Grid in Reservoir


Simulation,” paper, SPE 13507, presented at the 1995 Middle East
Oil Technical Conference and Exhibition (1985).
6. Yanosik, J.L. and McCracken, T.A.: “A Nine-Point, Finite-
Difference Reservoir Simulator for Realistic Prediction of Adverse
Mobility Ratio Displacements,” SPEJ (August 1979) 253; Trans.,
AIME, 267.
7. Z. E. Heinemann, C. W. Brand, “Gridding Techniques in
Reservoir Simulation”, Proc. First Intl. Forum on Reservoir

Downloaded from http://onepetro.org/IPTCONF/proceedings-pdf/07IPTC/All-07IPTC/IPTC-11512-MS/1801895/iptc-11512-ms.pdf/1 by PT Medco E&P Indonesia user on 07 October 2021


Simulation, Alphbach, Austria (1988).
8. C.L. Palagi, K. Aziz, “Use of Voronoi Grids in Reservoir
Simulation”, paper SPE 22889, presented at the 66th Annual
Technical Conference and Exhibition, Dallas (1991).
9. Gunasekera, D., Cox, J., Lindsey, P., “The Generation and
Application of K-Orthogonal Grid Systems”, paper SPE 37998,
presented at the SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, 8-11 June
1997, Dallas, Texas (1997).
10. David DeBaun et al., “An Extensible Architecture for Next
Generation Scalable Parallel Reservoir Simulation”, paper SPE
93274, presented at the 2005 SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium,
Houston, Texas (2005).

You might also like