Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Iptc 11512 MS
Iptc 11512 MS
impacts the flow properties of fluids with water becoming The initial fluid distribution is heavily influenced by capillary
more mobile as the rock becomes more oil wet. forces. The tilting FWL, separate gas caps, large variation in
oil properties and the wettability dependent flow
2.5 Well pattern and production history characteristics furthermore poses a challenge in the
The field is developed with long horizontal wells with an initialisation and dynamic modelling of the reservoir.
average horizontal length of some 19,000 ft while the longest
wells having up to 25,000 ft of reservoir section. In total, the
75 wells intersect more than 450 km of reservoir target. Most 3. Initialisation of Simulation Models
to be a function of its previous oil saturation history. For the Palaeo FWL FWL Porosity .
major part of the upper section of the Kharaib B accumulation
the oil saturations exceed 80-85% and the reservoir becomes Capillary Pressure Entry Capillary Pressure Irreducible / Critical water saturation
more oil wet. The relative permeability characteristics are Pc = f (HAFWL, Rho) Pce = f (Porosity, facies) Swir, Swcr = f(phi)
exponents drop from 5 to around 3 (Figure 4). Furthermore the Sor for a water-wet carbonate Nowi=
No = f (AWI)
remaining oil saturation tends to decrease as the wettability Sowcr = f(Sorwf) Sorwix = f (Sorwf,AWI,Sw)
Kro(Swir/Swcr
) = 1 (definition)
Nwi =f= (AWI)
Nw f (AWI)
1
The implementation of the Kr-Pc model was defined by 3
steps:
0
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1. Calculate and group normalized saturation functions
Palaeo Hydrocarbon Saturation
2. Calculate endpoint data on a cell by cell basis
3. Assign saturation function groups to the individual grid
Figure 4: Corey exponent as a function of palaeo hydrocarbon
saturation
cells.
In order to rigorously implement the complex wettability Killoughs hysteresis [Reference 4] between the drainage and
dependent petrophysical model in the simulation model imbibition processes was applied for the non-wetting phase in
endpoint scaling was employed to conveniently scale relative order to model the dependence of relative permeabilities on
permeability and capillary pressure curves to key parameters, the saturation path and history.
such as Swir, Sorw and Krw@Sorw on a grid cell basis. A
workflow was set up to define the oil-water endpoints in the The described petrophysical model was important for the
model based on unit type, porosity and saturation history history match. In particular the matching of formation
(wettability) as depicted in Figure 5. pressures along the long horizontal wells was a key to history
matching since significant variations in flow properties along
the wells were observed. Matching of logged swept zones
from water injectors further provided confidence in the
reservoir/petrophysical model since no breakthrough from a
water injector to a producer had been observed at the time of
history matching to validate modelling of the flood front.
IPTC 11512 5
Performance of the 75 production and injection wells was 5.2 Normal Cartesian Gridding
modelled with the described reservoir simulation model by use At the onset of the study, a coarse grid model with a regular
of the rock curves as defined by the petrophysical model. Cartesian grid was generated for the Kharaib B reservoir. The
grid was based on a lateral resolution of 500 ft by 500 ft and
5. Gridding Challenges had 14 layers resulting in a 156 x 249 x 14 model (505,249
active grid cells). Vertical cell thicknesses varied between 2
5.1 Background of Gridding Techniques and 15 feet. The model size was considered to be manageable
The geometry of oil fields, fault compartments and well from a run time perspective and therefore well suited for
2000
Figure 7 shows the actual distance from the central well (Well
2) to the two surrounding wells calculated from the well traces
(smooth lines), while the step functions represent the distances
between the grid cells intersected by the wells in the 500 ft
Well 6
simulation model. The difference between actual and grid cell Infill Producer
distances can be up to 500 ft for both wells which is
significant in the inner section of the radial well pattern and in
areas with wells spaced at around 1,000 ft. Well 7
2000 1300
Pressure
1500 1200
1000 1100
500 1000
0 900
4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Well MD [ft]
2000 1700
Pressure
1500 1600
wells. This was done with 3 different local grids having an
Actual Watercut
Modelled watercut
5.3 Local Grid Refinement around wells Figure 12: 2x 2 LGR grids in confined area of investigation.
The 500 ft model hence proved inadequate to model the
individual well behaviour due to the lack of grid resolution Figure 12 shows the 2x2 LGR around all wells in the area of
between wells. Creating a fine grid model to allow for at least investigation. The whole area is essentially a 250 ft grid with
3 grid cells between wells would require grid dimensions of all the LGR areas around the wells being amalgamated. The
only 200 ft or less. This translates into a full field model with inner part of the wells is though in a few instances still only
some 3 MM grid cells. Such a large model was considered separated by 1 grid cell. Further refinement of the grid
inefficient for history matching purposes due to the significant mitigates the problem, at the cost of additional memory
run-time and memory requirements. requirements and run-time.
The underlying grid was divided into two regions. An outer Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production
region with limited hydrocarbons mapped was constructed 1900
Pressure (psia)
simulation i.e. around 28% more active grid cells than the 500 1600
Reservoir and fluid properties and their distribution across the 1400
1200
5.4.1 Results from PEBI Grid Model 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
MD (ft)
The PEBI grid model was used for reservoir simulation with Logged Pressure PEBI Model Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure
each well being controlled by reservoir voidage rates.
Figure 18: Well 6 Comparison of pressures; Actual formation
Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production pressures, 500 ft Cartesian model and PEBI grid model.
1500
1400
The same was seen for the pressure response from the water
injector observed in infill Well 6 (Figure 9). The PEBI grid
1300
resulted in a smooth pressure curve at the tail end of the well
Pressure (psia)
1200
reflecting where the well was opposite to the water injector,
whereas the coarse grid model oscillated by 100 psi due to the
1100 varying distance to the injector caused by the non-alignment
of the wells with the grid. The pressure profile was smooth at
1000
the inner section of the well in the 500 ft grid as the distance
900
to the nearest well was almost constant, since the well trace
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
MD (ft)
14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000
intersected the grid along the cell diagonals. The outer part of
Logged Pressure PEBI Model Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure the well on the contrary is zigzagging through the grid cells
which results in the step wise changes in distance to the
Figure 17: Well 2 Comparison of pressures; Actual formation nearby well affecting the modelled pressures.
pressures, 500 ft Cartesian model and PEBI grid model.
The grid being aligned with the wells and having at least 6 Comparison of Pressures along the wellbore before start of production
grid cells between wells allowed for more accurate modelling 1900
of the field performance. The model pressure profiles became
smooth as the gradually increasing well distances were now 1800
1600
grid Cartesian model together with the profile obtained from
the PEBI grid. The PEBI grid model was able to reproduce the 1500
1200
4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000
Logged Pressure PEBI Model MD (ft)
Pressure COARSE GRID Model Pressure
LGR 2x2 LGR 3x3 LGR 4x4
psi for the 2x2 LGR grid. The 3x3 local grid refinement to poor grid resolution and non-alignment of wells.
reduced the oscillation to 30 psi while the 4x4 LGR reduced it Furthermore, it resolved the issues of modelling bottom-water
further to 25 psi. Even though the oscillation in the 4x4 grid is coning and flood front advancement between injectors and
small it is still a distortion of the results caused by gridding producers since the grid size was reduced around the wells
effects. where the large pressure drops and saturation changes
occurred, while still maintaining a reasonable model size. This
The matching of pressure profiles was critical for this approach also met the requirement for conducting history
reservoir with long horizontal wells. The capability of match runs using a full field model with a reasonable run-time,
More important for the crestal area of the field was modelling On balance, the benefits associated with the use of PEBI grids
of the progression of the flood front between injectors and for this reservoir outweighed the disadvantages of this
producers where the distance between wells was critical to approach.
ensure correct modelling of break through time and water cut
development. At the time of history matching, water
breakthrough from an injector had however not occurred and
could not be included in the history match. The advancement
of a flood front was as part of the reservoir characterisation
matched to a logged swept zone close to a water injector.
As discussed in the previous sections, the history matching of This case story shows how the history matching requirements
the Kharaib B reservoir required a model with a fine grid for a giant low relief carbonate reservoir, completed with a
resolution to capture the main flow paths and drive large number of horizontal wells drilled in irregular
mechanisms in the reservoir to be able to model field and producer/injector patterns with complex initial fluid
individual well performance to a sufficient degree of accuracy. distribution and flow characteristics led to the selection of a
However, the run time of the model had to be manageable to simulation model based on the PEBI gridding technique.