Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Team Name: Lakshya: Sai Teja Ramanujam Megha Manavdeep Singh Grover
Team Name: Lakshya: Sai Teja Ramanujam Megha Manavdeep Singh Grover
Team Name: Lakshya: Sai Teja Ramanujam Megha Manavdeep Singh Grover
SUPPLY CHAIN
Un-optimized Safety Stock Demand volatility Inventory Management Customer service levels
2
4
REMODELLING THE SUPPLY CHAIN
ORDER QUANTITY:
ത x (Leadtime + 𝑹
=Moving average of 𝑺 ഥ )+ k 𝑹(𝝈𝟐𝒔 ) + 𝑺ത 𝟐 (𝝈𝟐𝑹 )
– In Transit stock – Stock level
ഥ
𝑺 is the average daily sales (average demand per period),
ഥ the average replenishment cycle (average lead-time),
𝑹
𝝈𝟐𝑹 the variance of the replenishment cycle
The service level factor (k) is a dimension of the safety factor relating to safety
CATEGORIZATION FORECASTING MODELLING stock as a measure of customer service. Every retailer sets a service level factor
with many setting it at more than 95 percent in order to meet customer
Fast Moving Mid Month, ORDER QUANTITY= demand. Therefore, the calculation model should include the K factor (service
(90-95%) Periodic review +Forecast level) following a defined target for retailer policy
& (1 week for FM), +Safety stock
Slow Moving Continuous –In Transit Also, It is necessary to consider the joint impact of demand and the
(5-10%) review (for SM) –Stock level replenishment cycle variability for calculating the safety stock
DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL
Dispatching information from the DC to DATA POINTS Received product information from
retail stores CONSIDERED suppliers to the DC
A multiple regression analysis would be conducted by applying the inventory model and comparing with the actual
performance over a period of one year.
Analysis: Our Idea
Regression Model
Avg.
Product Avg. Inventory Product Product Service Level of Inventory Level (Y)=
Category Level (days) Replenishment
Category Category each category
cycle
A historical data A A
historical data
historical data
B B B
From
From
From
C C C
D D D
E E E
Materials that are planned using the time-phased planning technique are provided with an MRP date in the planning file. This date is set
when creating a material master record and is re-set after each planning run. It represents the date on which the material is to be
planned again and is calculated on the basis of the planning cycle entered in the material master record.
METHODS
Past Due Supply and Demand Material Scheduling Method
The planning process considers past due supply and demand as if it were due today The material scheduling method controls how the planning process calculates the
(in other words, the start date of the plan). Reports and on-line inquiries that bucket exact date of demand: the start date of the operation generating the demand, or the
demand in weeks or periods show past due demand in the first bucket. start date of the order generating the demand.
In-depth understanding of the relevant supply chain variables through in depth interviews and previous researchers industry reports
Key Actionable – Step 1 Key Actionable – Step 2 Key Actionable – Step 3 Key Actionable – Step 4
Step 1: Identification of relevant and Step 2: Once the elements of customer Step 3: Post choosing the larger number Step 4: Identification & clustering of
important deciding supply chain service are known, buyers of the of relevant individual elements of dealers the different dealers basis the similar
factors which are specific to the Pain product need to be surveyed to service, make more understandable service needs of supply chain
industry. It’s understood through determine the importance of these dimensions by understanding & attributes
interviews with a range of dealers & elements in their decision to select and consolidating the attributes in one
by understanding the service evaluate suppliers ( assign weightages to understandable deciding factors.
elements identified by earlier each attribute) Demands wise seasonal variability should
researchers also be considered
Detailed Segmentation Strategy – Step 1 & 2
Delivery lead time Supplier’s warehouse is located in customer’s immediate area Categories Served by the outlet
Conduct surveys to determine the importance of the supply chain attributes for the dealers.
Based on these surveys and value
This will help in evaluating the decision making criteria for the dealers. The user behavior
added by these attributes, we
can be understood through:
selected the Top 5 parameters which
• User Surveys would form a part of the metrics to
• Industry Reports help Asian Paints segment the
• Historic Analysis dealers into categories.
• POS Data External Market Analysis
Detailed Segmentation Strategy – Step 3 & 4
Weekly sales data is an important attribute for segmenting retailers based on their demand and
Sales/Outlet/Week
customer base
Considering this parameter will ensure that the dealers are segmented based on their order size
Frequency of Deliveries Segmentation
variability from EOQ. Deciding
Variables
The dealers stocking and selling more number of categories need to be analyzed separately as
Number of Categories Served
compared to those stocking fewer
Geo-demographic Factors These factors substantially affect the demand at a particular dealer.
The capacity to store inventory at the dealership plus the time taken to sell it is crucial for
Number of days of inventory
segmentation
Note: Consolidating larger number of attributes from Step 1 to one understandable & quantifiable attributes
Step 4: Identify segments by clustering the dealers with similar service needs
Note: Predicting the orders to be fulfilled using the new recommended prediction model. Predicting orders product portfolio wise and segment wise
APPENDIX
Note: Because of Non-availability of Asian Paints data, we have considered sample values in our
model taken from other firms and across industries
SOURCES
• https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308937480_Retail_su
pply_chain_service_levels_the_role_of_inventory_storage
• Beaumont, N. (2006), “Service level agreements: an essential
aspect of outsourcing”, The Service Industries Journal, Vol. 26
Category-wise
No. 4, pp. 381-395.
improvement in service • Cheng, K.L. and Lee, H.L. (2001), “The inventory benefit of
levels shipment coordination and stock rebalancing in a supply chain”,
Management Science, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 300-306.
• Graves, S.C. and Willems, S.P. (1998), “Strategic safety stock
placement in supply chain”, Journal of Manufacturing and
Operations Management, Vol. 1, pp. 67-71
THE TEAM
THANK YOU