This document contains a checklist for evaluating a LAC (Learning Action Cell) session guide. The checklist contains criteria for evaluating various elements of the session guide like objectives, content, activities, analysis, discussion, application, and reflection. A facilitator would use this checklist to rate each item on a scale of 1 to 4 and provide suggestions for improving any items rated below a 4. The overall purpose is to ensure LAC session guides are high-quality and effectively support teacher learning.
This document contains a checklist for evaluating a LAC (Learning Action Cell) session guide. The checklist contains criteria for evaluating various elements of the session guide like objectives, content, activities, analysis, discussion, application, and reflection. A facilitator would use this checklist to rate each item on a scale of 1 to 4 and provide suggestions for improving any items rated below a 4. The overall purpose is to ensure LAC session guides are high-quality and effectively support teacher learning.
This document contains a checklist for evaluating a LAC (Learning Action Cell) session guide. The checklist contains criteria for evaluating various elements of the session guide like objectives, content, activities, analysis, discussion, application, and reflection. A facilitator would use this checklist to rate each item on a scale of 1 to 4 and provide suggestions for improving any items rated below a 4. The overall purpose is to ensure LAC session guides are high-quality and effectively support teacher learning.
School: STA.RITA NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL District: Cabiao LAC SESSION GUIDE EVALUATION CHECKLIST Directions: Read item or dimension of the LAC Session Guide and criteria to evaluate the item or dimension (1 st column). Rate each item according to the criteria. Check the appropriate number in the scale. If rating is lower than 4, suggest ways of improving the item or component of the Session guide.
This form will be used to
Items/dimensions of the Session Guide being reviewed Legend:
4- Compliance with criterion is complete (or full)
3- Compliance with criterion is substantial but not complete 2- Compliance with criterion is limited 1- Compliance with criterion is not observable at all
4 3 2 1 Suggestions for Improvement
A. Enduring understanding or learnings 1. A key learning/understanding is identified for the major concepts/topics covered in the session guide 2. Key learnings/ understandings are aligned to the objectives. 3. The development of the Activities, Analysis, Abstraction and Application parts of the Session Guide support the achievement of the identified key learnings. B. Objectives 1. Are specific 2. Are measurable 3. Are realistically achievable at the end of the session or lesson 4. Target higher order thinking skills 5. Include KNOWING, DOING and VALUING dimensions as appropriate C. Over all content/topic 1. Session guide covers concepts that are critical to know about the topic 2. Coverage of topics is adequate to achieve objectives 3. Content is free from IPR infringement 4. Use of the guide in a LAC session could significantly contribute to improvement of teacher practice 5. Notes to LAC facilitator as needed are included in the session guide D. Activities 1. Activities used in the Session Guide are: Able to “hook” and keep teacher- users engaged LAC SESSION GUIDE EVALUATION CHECKLIST Directions: Read item or dimension of the LAC Session Guide and criteria to evaluate the item or dimension (1 st column). Rate each item according to the criteria. Check the appropriate number in the scale. If rating is lower than 4, suggest ways of improving the item or component of the Session guide.
This form will be used to
Items/dimensions of the Session Guide being reviewed Legend:
4- Compliance with criterion is complete (or full)
3- Compliance with criterion is substantial but not complete 2- Compliance with criterion is limited 1- Compliance with criterion is not observable at all
4 3 2 1 Suggestions for Improvement
Appropriate for adults Engaging Related to topic or content being developed 2. Have variety 3. Performing the activities leads to the achievement of objectives 4. Multiple activities are logically sequenced 5. Instructions for activities are clear and concise E. Analysis 1. Process questions in the Analysis portion of the Session Guide: Enable teacher- users to relate Activity (ies) to the content being studied and to key learnings Deepen teacher- users’ insights into the topic or the skill being taught Process questions target higher level thinking skills F. Discussion 1. Discussion questions or triggers: Are Focused on key concepts or principles Can elicit the desired key learnings or understandings from participants Align to objectives Fill in the gaps in the video content G. Application 1. Application activity is appropriate to the topic or skill contained in the session guide 2. Application activity can reasonably assess the ability of teachers using the session guide to transfer learning to a new situation H. Reflection 1. Reflection activities/exercises embedded in the session guide are LAC SESSION GUIDE EVALUATION CHECKLIST Directions: Read item or dimension of the LAC Session Guide and criteria to evaluate the item or dimension (1 st column). Rate each item according to the criteria. Check the appropriate number in the scale. If rating is lower than 4, suggest ways of improving the item or component of the Session guide.
This form will be used to
Items/dimensions of the Session Guide being reviewed Legend:
4- Compliance with criterion is complete (or full)
3- Compliance with criterion is substantial but not complete 2- Compliance with criterion is limited 1- Compliance with criterion is not observable at all
4 3 2 1 Suggestions for Improvement
meaningful 2. Reflection activities suggest ways of improving teacher agency or empowerment I. References 1. References used for the session guide are fairly recent 2. Refences are properly cited 3. Official Dep Ed policies relevant to topic are cited
Overall Rating: ________________________
Reference: DepEd Region 3 Self and Peer Checklist to Evaluate Session Guides
Evaluated by: FELISA T. ANDAMON Conforme: ESTELITA V.