Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Astm C 1025-91 (2000)
Astm C 1025-91 (2000)
Copyright © ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
C 1025
2
C 1025
10. Report 11.3 The six sets of data contained all of the specimens of
10.1 The report of each test shall include the following: the stated test geometry, and form a homogeneous population.
10.1.1 Sample identification, The data also exhibited a correlation between strength and
10.1.2 Average width to the nearest 0.03 mm (0.001 in.), density. Their mean strength, corrected by regression to the
10.1.3 Average thickness to nearest 0.03 mm (0.001 in.), mean density, was 225.4 kPa (1550 psi) with a standard
10.1.4 Support span length, mm (in.), deviation of 4.3 kPa (110 psi). Plotted on probability paper,
10.1.5 Rate of loading, mm (in.)/min. or N (lb)/min. their distribution appeared normal with no significant skewness
10.1.6 Maximum applied load, N (lb), or kurtosis. Tested by analysis of variation with degrees of
10.1.7 Modulus of rupture calculated to the nearest 70 kPa freedom 5 (between groups) and 24 (within groups against the
(10 psi), null hypothesis and the random effects hypothesis), a differ-
10.1.8 Defects in specimen, ence between labs was barely discernible. The null hypothesis
10.1.9 Orientation and location of specimen within the was satisfied at 90 % confidence level. The confidence band on
parent electrode, and the ratio of variances (between labs to within labs) included
10.1.10 Failure mode and location. zero at the two-sided 80 % confidence level. Best estimates for
the standard deviations are:
11. Precision and Bias 5 11.3.1 Between Laboratories:
11.1 The precision of this test method (see Practice E 691) sb5 6.76 kPa ~47 psi!
was determined from an ASTM round robin test on 38-mm
(1.50-in.) square cross section specimens which were cut from with 5 df.
a 153-mm (6.0-in.) thick slab from a 610 mm (24.0 in.) 11.3.2 Within Laboratories:
diameter premium grade electrode having a maximum particle sw 5 14.6 kPa ~100 psi!
size less than 6 mm (0.25 in.). Since this round robin was a
destructive test, each participating laboratory tested only their with 24 df.
samples. The samples sent to each laboratory were selected so 11.3.3 Mean Value:
as to represent the slab of graphite; that is, samples from x̄ 5 225.4 kPa ~1550 psi!
different radial locations within the 610-mm (24.0-in.) diam-
eter slab. Hence the stated precision not only represents the 11.3.4 It can also be safely concluded that the within-lab
variations within the test itself but also the variations within the variability is largely due to materials variability for which no
sampled electrode. data was available for correlation. Known effects include
11.2 The referenced ASTM round robin test was a multi- orientation and disparate flaws.
purpose test and only that portion of the test data accumulated 11.4 The stated precision of this test will probably worsen if
on four-point bending tests on square cross section specimens electrodes having a maximum particle size larger than 6 mm
was analyzed to arrive at the stated precision. Six laboratories (0.25 in.) are tested using this test method.
participated in the test to the extent that their methodology and 11.5 Bias—Bias cannot be determined as this is a destruc-
test fixtures conform to, but may not be identical to, this tive test and no standard specimens are available.
method and the fixture shown in Fig. 1.
12. Keywords
5
Supporting data are available from ASTM Headquarters. Request RR: C-5- 12.1 carbon; electrode graphite; flexural strength; graphite;
1009. modulus of rupture
The American Society for Testing and Materials takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection
with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such
patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible
technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your
views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at
610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org).