DPR Pipra To Gardi CH 3+100km

pradhan mantri gram sadak yojana (pmgsy-III)
Year (2021-22)
PACKAGE NO. : BR37SHYM02
Name of Road : PIPRA To GARDI
Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100

Name of Bridge :
KM in PIPRA To GARDI Road over River
State : Bihar
District : West Champaran
Block : Ramnagar
Span of Bridge : 11 X 18.5 M
Length Of Bridge : 220.00 M
Length Of Approch : 60.00 M
Cost of Bridge : 973.237 Lakh

Total Cost of Bridge Including App. : 1003.796 Lakh
Cost of Bridge Per M : 4.424 Lakh
5 Year Maintenance Cost : 0.253 Lakh
Submitted By: Prepared By:

Executive Engineer Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society,
West Champaran South Extension,Part-1
NEW DELHI-110049
1
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY-III)
SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PROJECT
NAME OF BRIDGE : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in

PIPRA To GARDI Road over River
DISTRICT : West Champaran

BLOCK : Ramnagar
LENGTH OF BRIDGE : 220.00 m

LENGTH OF APPROCH : 60.00 m
SPAN ARRANGEMENT : 11 X 18.5 M
TOTAL LENGTH OF IMPROVEMENT 280.00 m
Sl. No. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.)
1 COST OF BRIDGE STRUCTURE 861.271
2 COST OF APPROACH 25.473

TOTAL COST = 886.74
12% GST & 1 % LABOUR CESS 115.28
SEIGNOIRAGE FEE 10%= 1.77
TOTAL COST OF CONSTRUCTION (A) = 1003.80
5 YEARS MAINTENANCE COST (IN LACS)= 0.209

12% GST & 1 % LABOUR CESS 0.027
SEIGNOIRAGE FEE 10%= 0.016
SUB TOTAL = 0.253
G. TOTAL 1004.049
Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer
RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1
S.E.
RWD (w) Circle, Purnea
2
SUMMARY OF COST ESTIMATE FOR THE PROJECT
NAME OF BRIDGE : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in

DISTRICT : West Champaran

BLOCK : Ramnagar
Sl. No. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.)
1 COST OF FOUNDATION 50374845.18
2 COST OF SUB STRUCTURE 9393447.52
3 COST OF SUPER STRUCTURE 26256388.83
4 COST OF PROTECTION WORK 102453.57
5 COST OF APPROCH 1554384.51
6 COST OF DIVERSION 992961.24
TOTAL COST = 88674480.84
3
PROFORMA-A
DISTRICT WISE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSALS FOR THE YEAR 2021-22
Total Cost of Bridge including Approach

No. of Av. Cost per Mt.
Length of Road
Sl. No. District Package No. Habitations (Lakhs)
Bridge (m) (Lakhs)
Covered
Const. Maint. Const. Maint.
1 West Champaran BR37SHYM02 220.000 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001
TOTAL 1 0 220.000 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001

TOTAL HABITATIONS
NO. OF DIST. LENGTH (KMS) VALUE RS. (LAKHS) AV. COST /KM RS. (LAKHS)
PACKAGES COVERED
1
1 1 220.000 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001
4
DISTRICT WISE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSALS FOR THE YEAR 2021-22
PACKAGE SUMMARY
NAME OF ROAD : PIPRA To GARDI
DISTRICT West Champaran
BLOCK Ramnagar
Cost of
Link Length of Average Cost Total Estimated Cost of Bridge Average cost per Mt. of
Name of Length of Bridge
Sl. No. Route Name of Road Approach per Mt. of including Approach Road Bridge with Approach Road
Block Bridge (Structure
No. Road Bridge (Rs. in Lakhs) (Rs. in Lakhs)
Only)
From To m m Rs. In Lakhs Rs. in Lakhs Construction Maintenance Construction Maintenance
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15
1 Ramnagar MRL18 PIPRA To GARDI 220 60.000 973.237 4.424 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001
TOTAL 220 60.000 973.237 4.424 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001

RWD (w) Division,
RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1
Bagha - 1
5
PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJANA
Checklist for P.I.U. & S.T.A.
1 Location : State : Bihar District : West Champaran Block : Ramnagar
2 Package No : BR37SHYM02 -
3 Name of Road : PIPRA To GARDI
4 Total Length of Approach Road (m) :- 60.00 m
5 Name of the Proposed Bridge (if any) : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in PIPRA To GARDI Road over River
6 Length of the Proposed Bridge (Excluding Approaches) : 220.00 m
7 Width of Bridge (in mt) : 8.45
8 Through Route/ Link Route Nos. as per Core Network :
(i) Is the road a part of core network :
* if Yes, Sl. No. of road CN-I : Sl. No. of CN-VI :
* if Yes, Through Route/ Link Route No. : MRL18
Name of the benefitted Habitation (s) (to be cross checked with CN-VI) with
(ii) Sl. No. Habitation Population
population
1 Pipra 362
2 Gobrahia 914
3 Gardi 382
Total 1658
9 Whether the Road proposal was sanctioned earlier :

Yes / No
(i) If Yes, please mention the Phase, MoRD Sanction letter No and Date of Sanction :
(i) If Yes, please mention the Phase, MoRD Sanction letter No and Date of Sanction :
Phase : MoRD Sanction No. : Date :
Length : Chainage : From : To :
(ii) Cost of the Road Work sanctioned : Rs : Lakhs

Whether any CD/ Causeway was Sanctioned at or nearby location with the road proposal and whether the same was constructed or not (if yes, the
(iii)
details thereof with chainage) :
(iv) Whether the roadwork has been completed or in progress and likely date of completion :
(v) If not, How the connectivity and movement of traffic was ensured :
(v) Reasons for not proposing the Bridge at the time of Submission of Road proposal :
Total Cost
10 Estimated Cost ITEM Cost per Mt
(Rs. in Lakhs)
Approaches 17.565 0.0798
Bridge Super Structure 296.697 1.3486
Substructure & Foundation 675.382 3.0699
Others 14.152 0.0643
TOTAL 1003.796 4.571
H. Specification :- 267.68 MoRD Share :- 441.67 State Share :- 294.45
6
11 INDEX MAP (Not to Scale ) : Attached
Enroule Habitations Name / Chainage
GARDI
PIPRA
Proposed Bridge Location
12 Typical Sketch of proposed bridge showing schematic arrangement of span (Attached with Drawing)
13 Typical Photographs of proposed bridge location.
(i) U/S of Bridge
(ii) at of Bridge
(iii) D/S of Bridge
7
14 Type of Proposed Bridge :
(i) Submersible structures like vented causeway or Submersible Bridge
(ii) Box Bridge
(iii) Bridge with RCC Pier and Abutments √
a. Type of Foundation (Open/ Raft/ Well/ any other) Pile
b. Bearing Capacity at Foundation level 15 T
c. Aggangement of Span 11 X 18.5 M
Total Span 11 Nos of Vents 11 Clear Span of Vents 18.5
d. Critical Levels Road Top Level (RTL) 103.51

mtrs.
Average Ground level (AGL) 98.61
mtrs.
Nala Bed Level (NBL) 98.11
mtrs.
High flood Level (HFL) 100.92
mtrs.
Foundation Level (FL) 98.43 mtrs.
Ht. of Bridge h= (RTL-NBL) 5.40
mtrs.
Ht. of Bridge H= (RTL-FL) 5.08
mtrs.
Ordinary flood Level (OFL) 100.60
mtrs.
e. Catchment Area :
Catchment Area should be based on hydrological Survey or from toposheet
Catchment Area served = 5000 Hect.
Heaviest Rainfall = 69.9 mm/hr.
Basisc of Design Discharge:- 286.700 Manning, Dickens, Rotional formulae as per IRC Code
Waterway required = 151.600 m
Waterway provided = 151.600 m
f. Scour Depth (m) 96.043
15 Cost Details
A. General Costs
Cost of Perparation of DPR (Limiled to 1 % of Total cost of Bridge)
B. Bridge Components
Description of Components Quantity Cost Rs. Grade of
i) Foundation
Earthwork in excavation (Depth up to 3m) 1119.36 342792.81

PCC M15 58.12 475943.32 M15
R.C.C. grade M 35 in Pile cap 603.72 5247820.12 M30
Bored cast-in-situ M35 grade R.C.C. Pile (1000mm Dia) 1520.00 34162504.28 M35
Reinforcement 133.36 9770784.65
1.00 150000.00
Initial Load Test on test pile for 2.5 times the design load specified in Drawings
1.00 125000.00
Routine pile load test on pile for 1.5 times the design load specified in Drawings
Horizontal pile load test on pile for 1.5 times the design load specified in Drawings 1.00 100000.00
8
ii) SubStructure
R.C.C. grade M-30 (From 5m upto 10m height) 373.75 3369364.63 M30
R.C.C. grade M-35 (From 5m upto 10m height) 33.50 304905.20 M35
Bearing 1267200.00 950400.00
weepholes 132.00 15731.19
Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall 192.83 151987.49
filter media 51.53 254881.31
iii) Superstructure
R.C.C grade M-30 (Height 5m to 10m) 884.83 8638621.40 M30
Cement concrete wearing course 111.05 1905678.12 M30
Drainage Spouts 110.00 112143.13
P.C.C. M-15 levelling course below approach slab 8.82 70934.73
Reinforced Cement Concrete Approach slab 13.23 185910.37
Strip Seal Expansion Joint 100.80 883817.69
iv) Protection Work
13.58 66685.82
Providing and laying boulder pitching on slopes laid over prepared filter media
6.79 35767.75
Providing and laying filter material underneath pitching in slopes
C. Road Components (for Approach road/ Diversion)
Clearing and Grubbing 0.05 2617.87
Construction of embankment (from borrow pits) 4225.00 891583.58
subgrade & Earthen shoulder 253.20 54261.87
Granular Sub-base 49.57 168440.69
WBM Grading 2 34.43 205403.98
WBM Grading 3 17.21 101733.18

Prime Coat 229.50 12289.85
Tack Coat 229.50 4255.01
229.50 55820.36
Premix Carpet
229.50 18988.34
Seal Coat
Providing and Fixing 'Logo' of PMGSY Project 1.00 10279.39
Providing & Fixing of LOGO of "Citizen Information Board" 1.00 10279.39
5 Year Maintenance Board 1.00 10279.39
Diversion 992961.24
Road Marking with Hot Applied Thermoplastic Compound with Reflectorising Glass Beads on Bituminous Surface 12.00 8151.6
Total Cost of The Project (Rs.) 88674480.84
9
16 Five Year Routine Maintenance
Year Cost (in Lakhs) % Cost
I 0.028 0.003
II 0.038 0.004
III 0.051 0.005
IV 0.062 0.006
V 0.073 0.007
Total Maintenance Cost 0.252576007 0.025162089
17 Whether the Bridge has Geometrics as per latest Circular of NRRDA : YES/ NO
DO.#P-17035/1/2007-Tech. 30th September, 2014.
18 Whether the Cost Estimates are as per standard data analysis an SSR
19 Sources and the Leads distances of Materials are as under
Lead
Material Source Material Source Lead Distance
Distance
Earth Bitumen Muzaffarpur 57
GSB Bettiah 231 Emulsion Muzaffarpur 57
Aggregate Bettiah 359 Cement Bettiah 10
Sand Koilwar 257 Steel Bettiah 10
This is to Certified that,
1 Span details of bridge tallies with DPR & data uploaded on omms.nic.in & there is no deviation.
2 Information furnished herewith is true to the best of my knowledge.
3 Total cost of the project, State share & MoRD share worked out by PIU is justified.
4 The proposal of bridge is missing bridge proposal on sanctioned road & in the same stretch as it was sanctioned in previous phase under PMGSY.
DPR Prepared by DPR Checked by Checked & recommended
Junior Engineer Assitant Engineer Executive Engineer
10
To be filled by State Technical Agency

Name of STA : IIT, Patna
Name of Road : PIPRA To GARDI
Name of Bridge (if any) : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in PIPRA To GARDI Road over River
20 Is the proposed work is for CD/ Causeway of any length or bridge with span excluding approaches less than 15m. YES/ NO
STAs need not clear such proposals
21 Is the Proposal entered on the OMMS : YES/ NO

(Data entries to be verified by STA before Clicking the Proposal)
a. Span of Bridge on web : m b. Span of Bridge as per DPR :

* Span of bridge : C/C distance along the centre line of the bridge between inner faces of dirt walls.
c. Whether type of foundation & resting strata as per survey report justified to be safe YES/ NO
d. Whether Hydraulic design is checked & found to be adequate as per site requirements YES/ NO
e. Whether RCC designs are checked and found to be economical & safe. YES/ NO
f. Whether the provisions made by PIU are sufficient & essentia from economy point of view. YES/ NO
22 If the Proposal is for a Bridge for which Road was already Sanctioned
If Yes, Have you verified and satisfied yourself with all the items listed ar Sr. No. 7, by PIU Yes / No
Have you satisfied yourself that the road is a part of Core Network Yes / No
23 Are you Satisfied with the following
Engineering Surveys (L-section, X-sections must be verified) Yes / No

Soil/ Material Investigation Yes / No
Hydraulic Studies Yes / No
(Catchment for structures to be verified from topo sheet. Location and requirement of structures to be verified from L-section and catchment
area to be marked on Topo Sheet Copy)
24 Is the design of the following elements as per relevant IS/ IRC codes
Foundation / Abutments / Piers / Deck Slab / Wing Walls Yes / No
Does the Estimation Conform to Standard Rate Analysis and SoR generated for current Phase for PMGSY works and a
25 Yes / No
copy of SoR provided to STA
26 Does the proposal have provisions for
PMGSY Logo Sign Boards and Information Board Yes / No
27 Whether STA and Superintendent Engineer have visited the site? If Yes, Date of Visit :
Kindly indicate whether the program of visit was informed to NRRDA for prior approval?
28 Specific Remarks, if any, by STA
(Specific remarks of STA about the overall Bridge Project are necessary on each DPR)
29 Certificates :
Certified that the Design and Estimation for the Poroposed bridge are based on the data and SSR provided by PIU Engineers. The proposal after final Correction is entered on
the OMMS. The Proposal may be considered for clearance.
Technical Scrutiny at STA done by :
Signature Signature Signature
Name Name Name
Date Date Date
11
12
CROSS-SECTION
FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
(ON EARTHEN ROAD)
7500
SHOULDER Proposed Carriageway SHOULDER
(1875) (3750) (1875)
3.5% 3.5%
4.5% 4.5%
2 2
1 Embankement 1
GL
Premix Carpet (OGPC)+Seal Coat(Type-B)
WBM 75 mm (GR-III)
WBM 150 mm (GR-II)
Existing Soling 2.5 m wide
GSB Gr-II 200 mm
SHOULDER
CONSULTANTS:
BIHAR RURAL ROADS
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY Scale : Not to be Scale
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) J.E. A.E. E.E.
PIPRA TO GARDI AT CH 3+100KM
13
PIPRA TO GARDI AT CH 3+100KM
14
Legend
Untitled Map
Write a description for your map. Feature 1
Pipra To Gardi
➤
N
Image © 2022 Maxar Technologies 200 m 15
DETAILED DESIGN REPORT
COST ESTIMATE
Submitted By: Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt. Ltd.
16
( Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar)
NAME OF ROAD : PIPRA To GARDI LENGTH OF BRIDGE (M) : 220.00

BLOCK Ramnagar LENGTH OF APPROACH ROAD (M): 60.00
Sl. SDB Sl. MORD Ref Amount

Item Description Unit Quantity Rate
No. No. No. (in Rs.)
FOUNDATION
1 11.1 300 Excavation for Structures
Earthwork in excavation for structures as per drawing
and technical specifications Clause 305.1 including setting
out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of
stumps and other deleterious material and disposal upto a
lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling
in trenches with excavated suitable material.
I. Ordinary Soil
i) Upto 3m depth Cum 1,119.360 306.24 342792.81
2 12.39 Providing and laying of PCC M15 levelling course 150 mm
(MoRT thick
800 & 1200 II
&H)
II. PCC Grade M-15 (Levelling Course) Cum 58.119 8,189.12 475943.32
3 12.8 1500, R.C.C. grade M 30 in Pile Foundation complete as per Dwg
(G) 1700 & & Tech Specification.
(MoRT 2100
&H) Pile Cap in RCC M-30 (Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer
and Concrete Pump) Cum 603.720 8,692.47 5247820.12
4 12.24 1100, Bored cast-in-situ M35 grade R.C.C. Pile excluding
(MoRT 1600 & Reinforcement complete as per Drawing and Technical
&H) 1700 Specifications and removal of excavated earth with all lifts
and lead upto 1000 m.
I. 1000 mm Dia m 1,520.000 22475.33 34162504.28
5 11.7 1000 & Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement
1200 in foundation complete as per drawings and technical
specifications Clauses 1000 and 1202 MT 133.358 73,267.52 9770784.65
6 Carrying out load test on any pile as per standard
procedure laid down in the IS:2911 specification
including construction of test cap, dismantling the cap
after test and cleaning the site and maintaining
complete records of load
a) Initial Load Test on test pile for 2.5 times the design
load specified in Drawings
1.2 m Dia Pile Nos. 1.00 1,50,000.00 150000.00
b) Routine pile load test on pile for 1.5 times the design
1.2 m Dia Pile (2% of piles in total). Nos. 1.00 1,25,000.00 125000.00
c) Horizontal pile load test on pile for 1.5 times the design
1.2 m Dia Pile (2% of piles in total) . Nos. 1.00 1,00,000.00 100000.00
Sub Total of Foundation Items = 50374845.18
17


SUBSTRUCTURE
7 13.5 1500, R.C.C. grade M-30 in Substructure complete as per Dwg &
(G) 1700 & Tech Specification
(MoRT 2100 RCC M-30
&H) ii) From 5m upto 10m height (Using Batching Plant,
Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump) Cum 373.751 9,015.01 3369364.63
8 13.5 1500, R.C.C. grade M-35 in Substructure complete as per Dwg &
(H) 1700 & Tech Specification
(MoRT 2100 RCC M-35
&H) ii) From 5m upto 10m height (Using Batching Plant,
Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump) Cum 33.500 9,101.58 304905.20
9 12.6 1000 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement (Fe
415) in substructrue complete as per drawings and
technical specification Clauses 1002, 1005, 1010 & 1202 MT 59.190 73,427.72 4346177.70
11 13.14 Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and
(MoRT level elastomeric bearing conforming to IRC: 83 (Part-II)
&H) section IX and clause 2005 of MoRTH specifications
complete including all accessories as per drawing and
Technical Specifications. cc 12,67,200 0.75 950400.00
12 12.9 600 Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry,
plain/reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall, return
wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full
width of the structures with slope of 1(V):20(H) towards
drawing face complete as per drawing and technical
specification Clauses 614, 709, 1204.3.7
Nos 132 119.18 15731.19
13 12.10 1200 Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall
complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause
1204.3.8
I) Sandy Material Cum 192.833 788.18 151987.49
14 12.11 1200 Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed
aggregates (Jhama Metal) as per specification to a
thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size
towards the soil and bigger size towards the wall and
providing over the entire surface behind abutment, wing
wall, return wall to the full height, compacted to firm
condition complete as per drawing and technical
specification Clause 1204.3.8 Cum 51.534 4945.89 254881.31
Sub Total of Substructure Items = 9393447.52
SUPERSTRUCTURE
15 13.1 800 Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete in
superstructure complete as per drawing and technical
specifications Clauses 800, 1205.4 and 1205.5
II. RCC M-30 (Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and
Concrete Pump) Cum 884.829 9763.04 8638621.40
16 13.2 1000 Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement (Fe
415) in superstructrue complete as per drawings and
technical specification Clauses 1002, 1010 & 1202 MT 193.682 74654.60 14459283.39
Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M
30 grade including reinforcement complete as per
17 13.5 800
drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and
1206.3 Cum 111.053 17160.16 1905678.12
18 13.10 1200 Drainage Spouts complete as per drawing and technical
specifications Clause 1209 No 110.000 1019.48 112143.13
18


19 13.11 800 P.C.C. M-15 ordinary grade (1:2.5:5) levelling course
below approach slab complete as per drawing and
technical specificatios Clauses 800 & 1211. cum 8.820 8042.49 70934.73
20 13.12 800 Reinforced Cement Concrete M-30 grade approach slab
including reinforcement and formwork complete as per
drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and
1211 cum 13.230 14052.18 185910.37
21 14.22 2607 Strip Seal Expansion Joint (Providing and laying of a strip
(MoRT seal expansion joint catering to maximum horizontal
&H) movement upto 70 mm, complete as per approved
drawings and standard specifications to be installed by
the manufacturer/supplier or their authorised
representative ensuring compliance to the manufacturer's
instructions for installation.) m 100.800 8105.94 817078.98
22 14.18 2605 Providing & fixing 20 mm thick compressible fibre board
(ii) in expansion joint complete as per drawing & Technical
(MoRT Specification.
&H) m 100.800 260.07 26214.75
23 14.18 Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick premoulded
(III) joint filler in expansion joint for fixed ends of simply
(MoRT supported spans not exceeding 10 m to cater for a
&H) horizontal movement upto 20 mm, covered with sealant
complete as per drawing and technical specifications. m 100.800 402.02 40523.96
Sub Total of Superstructure Items = 26256388.83
PROTECTION WORK
24 14.5 1300 Providing and laying boulder pitching on slopes laid
over prepared filter media as per drawing and technical
specifications Clause 1302 cum 13.584 4909.27 66685.82
25 14.1 1300 Providing and laying filter material underneath
pitching in slopes complete as per drawing and technical
specifications Clause 1302 cum 6.792 5266.30 35767.75
Sub Total of Protection Items = 102453.57
Total Cost of Bridge Structure = 86127135.10
RWD (w) Division, RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1
Bagha - 1
19
Sl. No. SDB MORD Amount
SL .NO Ref.No Item Description Unit Length Width Height Quantity Rate
(in Rs.)
SUB HEAD : PREPARATORY WORKS ,SITE CLEARANCE , DISMANTLING
1 2.2 201 Clearing and Grubbing Road Land ( By manual means) including
(I-A ) uprooting wild vegetation , grass ,bushes ,shrubs , saplings and trees
of girth upto 300mm , removals of stumps of such trees cut earlier &
disposal of unserviceable materials & stacking of serviceable
materials to be used or auctioned upto a lead of 1000 m including
removal and disposal of top organic soil not exeeding 150mm in
thickness as per technical specification - clause 201.1 and direction of
E/I Ha 60.00 8.000 - 0.05 54538.88 2617.87
2 3.4 301.5 Construction of Embankment with material obtained from borrow
pits with a lift upto 1.5 m , transporting to the site spreading , grading
to required slope and compacting to meet requirement of Tables
300.1 and 300.2 with a lead upto 1000 m as per Technical
Specification Clause 301.5 .
100% of Embankment Material Cum 4225 211.03 891583.58
3 3.14 303.1 Construction of Subgrade and Earthen Shoulders
Construction of subgrade and earthen shoulders with approved
material obtained from borrow pits with all lifts and leads,
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and
compacted to meet requirement of Table 300.2 with lead upto 1000
m as per Technical Specification Clause 303.1.
i) Construction of subgrade (Full Width) 1 60.0 (7.25+8.45)/2 0.3 141.3
ii) Earthen shoulder
Adjacent to WBM 2 60.0 2.100 0.225 56.70

Adjacent to GSB 2 60.0 2.300 0.200 55.20
Cum Total Quantity = 253.20 214.30 54261.87
20
(in Rs.)
Sub Head : PAVEMENT LAYERS - GSB & WBM ITEMS
4 4.1 401 Granular Sub-base with Well Graded Material (Table 400.1)
(A) (By mix in place method)
(ii) For Grading II Material
Construction of granular sub-base by providing well graded material,
spreading in uniform layers with tractor mounted grader
arrangement on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place method
with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with smooth wheel roller to
achieve the desired density, complete as per Technical Specification
Clause 401. Cum 60.00 4.05 0.200 48.60
Add for Extra Widening @ 2% of total Vol. Cum 0.97
Cum 49.57 3397.90 168440.69
5 4.7 405 Water Bound Macadam with Stone Screening Type "B" Gr- II
(2-A) WBM Grading 2 (By Mechanical Means)
Providing, laying, spreading and compacting stone aggregates of
specific sizes to water bound macadam specification including
spreading in uniform thickness, hand packing, rolling with three
wheel 80-100 kN static roller in stages to proper grade and camber,
applying and brooming, crushable screening to fill-up the interstices
of coarse aggregate, watering and compacting to the required density
Grading 2 as per Technical Specification Clause 405. Cum 60.00 3.75 0.15 33.75
Cum 34.43 5966.71 205403.98
21
(in Rs.)
6 4.7 405 WBM Grading 3 (By Mechanical Means)
( 3-A ) Providing, laying, spreading and compacting stone aggregates of
specific sizes to water bound macadam specification including
spreading in uniform thickness, hand packing, rolling with three
wheel 80-100 kN static roller in stages to proper grade and camber,
applying and brooming, crushable screening to fill-up the interstices
of coarse aggregate, watering and compacting to the required density
Grading 3 as per Technical Specification Clause 405.
Cum 60.00 3.75 0.075 16.88
Cum 17.21 5910.42 101733.18
SUB HEAD : BITUMINOUS ITEMS
7 5.1 502 Prime Coat (Low porosity)
(I)
Providing and applying primer coat with Bitumen emulsion (SS-1)
on prepared surface of granular base including cleaning of road
surface and spraying primer at the rate of 0.70- 1.0 kg/sqm using
mechanical means as per Technical Specification Clause 502.
Sqm 60 3.75 - 225.00
Add for Extra Widening @ 2% of Total Area Sqm 4.50
Sqm 229.50 53.55 12289.85
8 5.2 503 Tack Coat
(I) Providing and applying tack coat with bitumen emulsion (RS ) using
emulsion distributor @ 0.2 to 0.25 kg per sq m on the prepared
bituminous surface cleaned with hydraulic broom as per technical
specification clause 503. Sqm 60.00 3.75 - 225.00
Sqm 229.50 18.54 4255.01
22
(in Rs.)
9 5.9 508 Premix Carpet (Waste Plastic)
(II ) Providing, laying and rolling of open-graded premix carpet of 20
mm thickness composed of 13.2 mm to 5.6 mm aggregates either
using penetration grade bitumen or emulsion to required line,
grade and level to serve as wearing course on a previously
prepared base, including mixing in a suitable plant, laying and
rolling with a three wheel 80-100 kN static roller capacity, finished
to required level and grades to be followed by seal coat of either
Type A or Type B or Type C as per Technical Specification Clause
508. Sqm 60 3.75 - 225.00
Sqm 229.50 243.23 55820.36
10 5.12 510 Seal Coat
( II ) Providing and laying seal coat sealing the voids in a bituminous
surface laid to the specified levels, grade and cross fall using Type B,
as per Technical Specification Clause 510 Sqm 60 3.75 - 225.00
Sqm 229.50 82.74 18988.34
23
(in Rs.)
11 10.2 1700 Informatiry Sign Board
300 Providing and Fixing 'Logo' of Project informayory sign board with
Logo as per MORD specifications and drawing. Three MS plates of
1.6mm thick, top and middle plate duly welded with MS flat iron
25mm x 5 m size on back on edges. The lower plate will be welded
with MS angle iron frame of 25mm x 25mm 5mm. The angle iron
frame of the lower most plate and flat iron frame of middle plate will
be welded to 2 Nos. 75mm x 75 mm of 12 SWG sheet tubes posts
duly embedded in cement concrete M-15 grade blocks of 450mm x
450mm x 600 mm,600 mm,600 below ground level. The top most
diamond plate will be welded to middle plate by 47mm x 47mm of
12SWG steel plate tube. All M.S will be stove enameled on both sides.
Lettering and printing arrows, border etc, will be painted with ready
mixed synthetic enamer paint of superior quality in required shade
and colour. All sections of framed posts and steel tube will be
painted with primer and two coats of epoxy paint as per drawing
Clause 1701 abd Annexure 1700.1.
Nos 3 10279.39 30838.18
Road Marking with Hot Applied Thermoplastic Compound with
Reflectorising Glass Beads on Bituminous Surface-Providing
and laying of hot applied thermoplastic compound 2.5 mm thick
including reflectorising glass beads @ 250 gms per sqm area,
thickness of 2.5 mm is exclusive of surface applied glass beads as
per IRC:35 .The finished surface to be level, uniform and free from
12 streaks and holes. Sqm 60 0.20 12.00 679.30 8151.60
TOTAL COST OF APPROACH ROAD = 1554384.51
24
(in Rs.)
Sub Head : Diversion
13 Construction of Diverson & Earthen Dam
Construction of Embankment with material obtained from borrow
pits with a lift upto 1.5 m , transporting to the site spreading , grading
(i) 2.2 201 (I-A ) to required slope and compacting to meet requirement of Tables Cum 125 (4.0 + 8)/2 2.0 1500 211.03 316538.55
300.1 and 300.2 with a lead upto 1000 m as per Technical
Specification Clause 301.5 .
Granular Sub-base with Well Graded Material (Table 400.1)
Grading II -Construction of granular sub-base by providing well
graded material, spreading in uniform layers with tractor mounted
14 4.1 401 (II) grader arrangement on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place Cum 125 3.75 0.15 70.3125 3397.90 238914.83
method with rotavator at OMC, and compacting with smooth wheel
roller to achieve the desired density, complete as per Technical
Specification Clause 401.
Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP3 as per
15 1100 B m 60 7291.80 437507.86
design in Single Row
TOTAL COST OF DIVERSION = 992961.24
25
SUMMARY OF 5 YEARS MAINTENANCE COST
DISTRICT:- West Champaran

BLOCK:- Ramnagar
NAME OF ROAD:-
Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in
LENGTH OF ROAD (KM):- 0.060 km
Amount in
Particulars Amount in Rs. (Lakh)
1st Year Maintenance cost 2204.00 0.022

2nd Year Maintenance cost 3127.00 0.031
3rd Year Maintenance cost 4220.00 0.042
4th Year Maintenance cost 5201.00 0.052
5th Year Maintenance cost 6180.00 0.062
Total Cost of 5 years Maintenance 20932.00 0.209
ESTIMATE FOR 5 YEARS MAINTENANCE WORKS
Total Length Of Road = 60 m

Length Of the Flexible Pavement = 60 m
Length Of the Regid Pavement = 0m
Width Of the Road (Br) = 3.75 m
Width Of the Shoulder (Bs) = 1.125 m
No. Of Hume Pipe Culvert = 0
No. Of Slab Culvert = 0
Length of Drain= 0m
Multiplying Factor for Commercial Vehicle 15 to 45 per days = 1.25 {ref. – Annexure 14.4 operation Manual from Rural Road}
Yearly
%
Sl. No. SOR No. Description of Items Unit Estimated Rate (Rs.) Amount (Rs.)
Taken
Qty.
Restoration of Raincuts/Berms with soil.moorum
1 15.1 Cum 5 2.53 357.77 906.00
etc(Qty=L*Bs*0.3*%taken) X 1.25
Making up of Berms/shoulder, stripping excess soil
2 15.2 from the shoulder surfaces to achieve level etc. Sqm 8 13.50 54.92 741.00
(Qty=L*Br*%taken) X 1.25
Maintenance of WBM Road Maintenance of WBM road
including filling up of pot holes, ruts and rectifying
3 15.5 Sqm 0 0.00 537.89 0.00
corrugated surface, damaged edges and ravelling as per
technical specification Clause 1906.
Patch repair over bituminous surface with 20 mm
4 15.3(iii) Sqm 0.5 1.41 395.87 557.00
Premix Carpet (Qty=L*Br*%taken) X 1.25
Maintenance of RCC Railing
Repair of RCC railing to bring it to the original shape,
5 15.10 M 0.1 0.00 2455.96 0.00
cleaning and repainting as per drawings and technical
specification Clause 1911
Estimate For First Year Maintenance Work Rs. 2,204.00
26
1 15.1 Cum 6 3.04 357.77 1,087.00
2 15.2 from the shoulder surfaces to achieve level etc. Sqm 10 16.88 54.92 927.00
3 15.5 Cum 0 0.00 537.89 0.00
4 15.3(iii) Sqm 1 2.81 395.87 1,113.00
5 15.10 M 0.1 0.00 2455.96 0.00
Estimate For Second Year Maintenance Work Rs. 3,127.00

1 15.1 Cum 7 3.54 357.77 1,268.00
2 15.2 from the shoulder surfaces to achieve level etc. Sqm 12 20.25 54.92 1,112.00
3 15.5 Cum 1.5 0.32 537.89 170.00
4 15.3(iii) Sqm 1.5 4.22 395.87 1,670.00
5 15.10 M 0.1 0.00 2455.96 0.00
Estimate For Third Year Maintenance Work Rs. 4220.00
27
1 15.1 Cum 8 4.05 357.77 1,449.00
3 15.5 Cum 2 0.42 537.89 227.00
4 15.3(iii) Sqm 2 5.63 395.87 2,227.00
5 15.10 M 0.1 0.00 2455.96 0.00
Estimate For Forth Year Maintenance Work Rs. 5,201.00
1 15.1 Cum 9 4.56 357.77 1,630.00
3 15.5 Cum 2.5 0.53 537.89 284.00
4 15.3(iii) Sqm 2.5 7.03 395.87 2,783.00
5 15.10 M 0.1 0.00 2455.96 0.00
Estimate For Fifth Year Maintenance Work Rs. 6,180.00
28
SEIGNOIRAGE FEE
Total Add
Sl. SDB MORD Amount Material
Description Unit Quantity Rate Materia Seignoirage
No. Sl .NO Ref.No (In Rs.) Amount
l Fee 10%
EARTHWORK ( FOUNDATION)
1 3.4 301.5 Construction of Embankment with material obtained
from
Unit =borrow
cum pits with a lift upto 1.5 m , transporting to
Taking output = 100 cum
a) Material
Compensation For Earth Taken From Private Land Cum 60.00 34.82 2,089.20
Cost for 100 cum = a 2,089.20
Rate Per Cum = (a)/100= 20.89
Total Cost = Cum 20.89 4,225.00 88,268.70 8,826.87
APPROACH ROAD
( By mix in place method )
(i) For Grading I Material
Construction of granular sub-base by providing well
graded material,
For Grading spreading in uniform layers with
II Material
Unit = cum
a) Material
Well graded granular sub-base material as per Table 400.1
53 mm to 9.5 mm @ 50 per cent Cum 180.00 610.74 1,09,933.20
9.5 mm to 2.36 mm @ 20 per cent Cum 72.00 506.92 36,498.240
2.36 mm below @ 30 per cent (Course Sand) Cum 108.00 175.80 18,986.400
Cost for 300 cum = a 1,65,417.84
Rate Per Cum = (a)/300= Cum 551.39
Total Cost = Cum 551.39 49.57 27,333.64 2,733.36
3 4.7 405 WBM Grading 3
WBM Grading 3 (Mechanical means)
Providing, laying, spreading and compacting stone
aggregates
For WBM IIofMaterial
specific sizes to water bound macadam
Unit = cum
a) Material
Aggregate
Grading-III 53 mm to 22.4 mm @ 0.91 cum per 10 sqm
for compacted thickness of 75 mm 435.60 503.85 2,19,477.06
Cum
Stone Screening
86.40 392.53 33,914.592
Type B 11.2 mm for Grading III @ 0.18 cum per 10 sqm Cum
Cost for 360 cum = a 2,53,391.65
Total Cost = Cum 703.87 17.21 12,115.29 1,211.53
29
II Providing, laying and rolling of open-graded premix
carpet of 20 mm thickness composed of 13.2 mm to 5.6
mm aggregates either using penetration grade bitumen
or emulsion to required line, grade and level to serve
as wearing course on a previously prepared base,
including mixing in a suitable plant, laying and rolling
with a three wheel 80-100 kN static roller capacity,
finished to required level and grades to be followed by
seal coat of either Type A or Type B or Type C as per
Technical Specification Clause 508.
Unit = sqm
Taking output = 4000 sqm (80 cum)
a) Material
Aggregate
Stone crushed aggregates 11.2 mm to 0.09 mm @ 0.27
Cum 108.00 515.53 40,449.24
cum per 10 sqm
Cost for4000 Cum= a 40,449.24
Total Cost = Cum 10.11 229.50 2,320.78 232.08
FOUNDATION
11 12.39 1100 & Providing and laying of PCC M15 levelling course
Mort&H 1700 100mm thick below the pile cap.
(ii) P.C.C Grade M 15 In Pile Foundation
Unit = Cum
a) Material
Coarse sand Cum 0.48 175.80 157.55
40 mm aggregate Cum 0.48 486.92 449.18
20 mm aggregate Cum 0.24 595.36 554.90
10 mm aggregate Cum 0.08 657.91 615.52
Rate Per Cum = (a)= Cum 1,777.15
Rate Per Cum = (a)/15=
Total Cost = Cum 118.48 58.12 6,885.75 688.57
12 1500,
1700 & R.C.C Grade M 30 In Foundation
2100
R.C.C. grade M 30 in Open Foundation complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
Unit = Cum
Taking ouput = 120 cum
a) Material
Coarse sand Cum 54.00 175.80 8,143.20
20 mm aggregate Cum 64.80 595.36 35,695.08
10 mm aggregate Cum 43.20 657.91 26,532.14
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 70,370.42
Rate Per Cum = (a)/120= 586.42
Total Cost = Cum 586.42 603.72 354033.60 35403.36
30
SUBSTRUCTURE
17 13.5(G) 1500,
R.C.C. grade M-30 in Substructure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using
1700 &
MoRT&H Data Book)
2100
R.C.C Grade M 30 In Substructure
Height 5m to 10m
Unit = Cum
Material
Coarse sand Cum 54.00 175.80 8,143.20
20 mm aggregate Cum 64.80 595.36 35,695.08
10 mm aggregate Cum 43.20 657.91 26,532.14
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 70,370.42
Rate Per Cum = (a)/120= 586.42
Total Cost = Cum 586.42 373.75 2,19,174.93 21,917.49
18 13.5(H) 1500,
R.C.C. grade M-35 in Substructure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using
1700 &
MoRT&H Data Book)
2100
R.C.C Grade M 35 In Substructure
Height 5m to 10m
Unit = Cum
Material
Coarse sand Cum 54.00 175.80 8,143.20
20 mm aggregate Cum 64.80 595.36 35,695.08
10 mm aggregate Cum 43.20 657.91 26,532.14
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 70,370.42
Rate Per Cum = (a)/15= 4,691.36
Total Cost = Cum 4,691.36 33.50 1,57,161.79 15,716.18
7 12 1200
Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed aggregates as per specification to a thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the wall and providing over the entire surface behind abutment, wi
Unit = cum
Material
Filter media as per specification Cum 12.00 3173.72 38084.6
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 38084.6
Rate Per Cum = (a)/10= 3808.464
Total Cost = Cum 3808.464 58.3258 2,22,131.79 22,213.18
8 14.5 1300 Providing and laying Boulder pitching on slopes laid over prepared filter media as per
drawing and technical specifications Clause 1302
Stone/Boulder
Unit = cum
Material
Stone boulder (25 kg minimum) Cum 1.00 351.36 351.36
Stone spalls of minimum 25 mm size Cum 0.20 351.36 70.27
Total Cost = 421.63 13.5836 5,727.30 572.73
8 12.10 1200 Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical specification Clause 1204.3.8
Unit = cum
Granular material
Material
Coarse sand Cum 12 142 1702
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 1702
Rate Per Cum = (a)/10= 170.2
Total Cost = Cum 170.2 192.833 32823.95 3282.394815
31
SUPERSTRUCTURE
9 14.1 1500,
(C) 1600 & R.C.C. grade M 30 in Super Structure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
1700
R.C.C Grade M 30 In Superstructure
Unit = cum (Height 5.0 m to 10.0m )
Material
Coarse sand Cum 54.60 175.80 9,598.68
20 mm aggregate Cum 64.80 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm aggregate Cum 43.20 657.91 28,421.71
Rate Per Cum = (a)= 76,599.72
Rate Per Cum = (a)/120= 638.33
Total Cost = 638.331 884.829 5,64,813.97 56,481.40
10 13.11 800
P.C.C. M 15 ordinary grade (1:2.5:5) levelling course below approach slab complete as per drawing and technical
specifications Clauses 800 and 1211.
P.C.C grade M 15
Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)
Unit = cum
Material
Coarse sand Cum 0.48 175.8 84.38
40 mm aggregate Cum 0.48 486.92 233.72
20 mm aggregate Cum 0.24 595.36 142.89
10 mm aggregate Cum 0.08 657.91 52.63
Total Cost = 513.6248 8.82 4,530.17 453.02
11 14.4 800
Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M 30 grade including reinforcement complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1206.3
Wearing M- 30 In Superstructure
Material
Coarse sand Cum 0.45 175.80 79.11
20 mm aggregate Cum 0.54 595.36 321.49
10 mm aggregate Cum 0.36 657.91 236.85
Total Cost = 637.45 124.283 79,224.13 7,922.41
Total Construction Cost (With 10% Seigniorage Fee) :-- 1,77,422.50
MAINTENANCE
12 15.1 1900 Restoration of Rain Cuts Restoration of rain cuts with soil, moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil, benching for
300mm width laying fresh material in layers not exceeding 250 mm and compaction with plate compactor or power rammer to restore
the original alignment, level and slopes as per drawings and technical specifications Clause 1902
Restoration of Rain Cuts
A. Manual Means
Unit = cum
a) Material
Compensation For Earth Taken From Private Land Cum 7.50 34.82 261.15
Cost For 10 Cum = a 261.15
Total Cost = Cum 26.12 417.72 10,908.73 1,090.87
13 15.2 1900 Maintenance of Earthen shoulder (filling with fresh selected soil) Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the design
level by adding fresh approved selected soil and compacting it with appropriate equipment at OMC upto a lead of 1000 m as per
technical specification Clause 1903
32
Maintenance Of Earthen Shoulder (Filling With
Fresh
Unit = Selected
sqm Soil)
Taking output = 100 sqm
Assuming average thickness of filling to be 150 mm
Quality of fresh material = 15 cum
a) Material
Compensation For Earth Taken From Private Land Cum 7.50 34.82 178.35
Cost For 100 Sqm = a 178.35
Rate Per Sqm = (a)/100= Cum 1.78
Total Cost = Cum 1.78 101.25 180.58 18.06
14 15.3 1900 Maintenance of WBM Road

Maintenance of WBM road including filling up of pot
holes, ruts and rectifying corrugated surface, damaged
edges and ravelling as per technical specification
Clause 1906.
Unit = cum
Output - Taking affected area @ 5% in 1 km
= 1000 x 3.75 x 0.05 = 187.5 sqm
Quantity 187.5 x 0.075 = 14.06 cum
a) Material
Grading 3 53 mm to 22.4 mm @ 0.91 cum per 10 sqm
for compacted thickness of 75 mm Cum 435.60 503.85 2,19,477.06
Type B 11.2 mm for Grading 3 @ 0.18 cum per 10 sqm
Cum 86.40 392.53 33,914.59
Cost for 360 cum = 2,53,391.65
Cost for 1 cum = 703.87
Cost for 14.06 cum = 9,896.35
Rate Per Cum = (a)/187.5= Cum 52.78
Total Cost = Cum 52.78 1.27 66.80 6.68
15 15.3 1900 Patch repair on already filled pot holes with 75 mm BM with 20 mm premix carpet and seal coat Type B as
per drawings and technical specification Clause 1904.2
Unit = sqm
Takign output = 200 sqm
a) Material
Grading (1) (40 mm nominal size)
Crushed stone aggregate @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm Cum 5.40 553.36 2,988.14
Crushed sand passing 2.36 mm sieve and retained on
180 mircon sieve @ 0.06 cum per 10 sqm Cum 1.20 234.89 281.87
Cost For 200 Sqm = a 3,270.01
Rate Per Sqm = (a)/200= sqm 16.35
Total Cost = sqm 16.35 321.09 5,249.90 524.99
Total Maintenace Cost (With 10% Seigniorage Fee) :-- 1,640.60

0.016
Total Construction Cost (With 10% Seigniorage Fee) :-- 1,77,422.50
1.774
33
QUANTITY ESTIMATE
34
ESTIMATE OF QUANTITY OF BRIDGE ONLY
PIPRA TO GARDI CH - 3+100KM (11x20)
Length Breadth Height

Sl No. Description Unit nos Quantity
(m) (m) (m)
FOUNDATION
Excavation upto 3.0m depth
Abutment-1 cum 1 11.30 5.300 2.000 119.78
Pier-1 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-2 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-3 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-4 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
1(i) Pier-5 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-6 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-7 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-8 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-9 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Pier-10 cum 1 8.30 5.300 2.000 87.98
Abutment-2 cum 1 11.30 5.300 2.000 119.78
Total 1119.36
Bored Cast-in-situ Pile M35 (1000MM Dia)

Abutment-1 m 8 20.00 160.00
Pier-1 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-2 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-3 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-4 m 6 20.00 120.00
2 Pier-5 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-6 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-7 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-8 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-9 m 6 20.00 120.00
Pier-10 m 6 20.00 120.00
Abutment-2 m 8 20.00 160.00
Total 1520.00
Levelling Course for Pile Cap M15

Abutment-1 cum 1 10.60 4.600 0.15 7.31
Pier-1 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-2 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-3 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-4 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
3(i) Pier-5 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-6 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-7 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-8 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-9 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Pier-10 cum 1 7.60 4.600 0.15 5.24
Abutment-2 cum 1 10.60 4.600 0.15 7.31
Less Quantity for the area of all piles cum -76 0.79 0.15 -8.95
Total= 58.12
Pile Cap M30

Abutment-1 cum 1 10.30 4.300 1.50 66.44
Pier-1 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-2 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-3 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
35
3(ii)
Pier-4 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-5 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
3(ii)
Pier-6 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-7 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-8 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-9 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Pier-10 cum 1 7.30 4.300 1.50 47.09
Abutment-2 cum 1 10.30 4.300 1.50 66.44
Total= 603.72
Steel Reinforcement
4 As Per BBS 133.36
Ton 133.358
Total= 133.358
SUBSTRUCTURE
RCC M30 upto 5 m
Abutment-1 cum 1 8.40 1.000 2.570 21.59
Abutment-2 cum 1 8.40 1.000 2.265 19.03
Abutment Cap -1,2 cum 2 8.40 1.335 0.800 17.94
Pier-1 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.204 6.61
Pier-2 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.198 6.59
Pier-3 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.400 7.20
Pier-4 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.091 6.27
Pier-5 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.202 6.61
Pier-6 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.293 6.88
5(i) Pier-7 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.288 6.86
Pier-8 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.356 7.07
Pier-9 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.215 6.65
Pier-10 cum 1 3.00 1.000 2.344 7.03
Pier Cap-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
Trapezoidal Part V = cum 10 5.50 2.610 0.650 93.31
1/2(Base1+Base2)XHXB
Pier Cap-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
cum 10 8.00 2.610 0.600 125.28
Rectrangular Part
Dirt Wall cum 2 8.40 0.400 1.875 12.60
Return Wall cum 2 1.65 0.500 4.870 8.04
2 1.65 0.500 4.565 7.53
Bracket Tringular Portion cum 2 7.40 0.045 0.67
Bracket Rectangle Portion cum 2 7.40 0.300 0.525 2.33
Total= 373.75
36
RCC M35 upto 5 m for pedestal & reaction block
Pedestal cum 66 0.850 0.850 0.150 7.15
5(iii) RB1 cum 44 0.800 0.500 0.900 15.84
RB2 cum 20 0.300 0.700 0.900 3.78
RB3 cum 20 0.575 0.650 0.900 6.73
Total= 33.50
Steel Reinforcement
6
Ton As per BBS 59.190
Total= 59.190
Weep holes
Spacing for weep holes = 2 m in horizontal and 1 m in vertical direction
No of weep holes in horizontal direction per abutment = 8.4/2+1 = 6
No of weep holes in vertical direction per abutment = 3+1 = 4
7 No of weep holes in horizontal direction per return wall =3.5/2+1 = 3
No of weep holes in vertical direction per return wall =5.567/1+1 = 7
Total no of Weep holes per abutment = 6 x 4 24
Total no of Weep holes per return wall = 3 x 7 21
Total no of weep holes = 24 x 2 + 21 x 4 Total 132.00
Backfilling - Sandy Material

Behind Abutment-1 cum 1 7.40 3.50 4.870 126.13
8
Deduct for filter media -51.53
Total 192.83
Filter media
9
Behind Abutment-2 1 7.400 0.60 4.565 20.27
Behind Return wall cum 2 1.650 0.60 4.870 9.64
cum 2 1.650 0.60 4.565 9.04
Total 51.53
Elastomeric Bearing Nos cm cm cm

10(ii)
Bearing B1,B2,B3 cc 66 32.00 40.00 15.00 1267200.00
Total 1267200.00
37
SUPERSTRUCTURE
RCC M30 T Beam
Deck Slab
Slab cum 11 20.00 8.40 0.225 415.80

Long Girder
(i) Middle Portion cum 33 14.100 0.300 1.100 153.55
11
(ii) Bulb Rectangular Portion cum 33 14.100 0.250 0.600 69.80
(iii) Bulb Trapezoidal Portion Middle cum 33 14.100 0.023 10.47
(iv) Top Haunch Portion cum 44 14.100 0.023 13.96
(v) Top Haunch at varying Portion cum 66 1.200 0.150 1.250 14.85
(vi) Top Haunch at end portion cum 66 0.800 0.600 1.350 42.77
Cross Girder cum 33 5.400 0.300 1.100 58.81
Crash Barrier
Bottom Rectangular Portion cum 2 167.800 0.450 0.215 32.47
Middle Trapezoidal Portion cum 2 167.800 0.363 0.250 30.41
Top Trapezoidal Portion cum 2 167.800 0.250 0.500 41.95
Total 884.83
HYSD Bars
12
Ton As Per BBS 193.682

Total= 193.682
13 Drainage Spout nos. 110 Total 110.00
14(i) PCC below Approach Slab M15

cum 2 8.40 3.50 0.15 8.82
Total 8.82
14(ii) Approach Slab M30 cum 2 8.400 3.50 0.225 13.23

Total 13.23
PCC M30 Wearing Coat

15
cum 1 227.80 7.50 0.065 111.05
Total= 111.05
Strip Seal Expansion Joint

16
m 12 8.400 100.80
Total 100.80
17(i) Compressible fibre board m 12 8.400 100.80

Total 100.80
17(ii) Premoulded Filler Joint m 12 8.400 100.80

Total 100.80
38
PROTECTION WORK
18 Boulder Pitching (cum)
cum 4 11.320 0.30 13.58
Total 13.58
19 Filter Material (Cum) cum 4 11.320 0.15 6.79

Total 6.79
39
Requirement of HYSD bar:
Quantity
Sl.No. Structure Name Category
(Ton)
1) Superstructure: Superstructure 193.682
Foundation 94.717
Substructure 30.588
2) Pier Pedestal 2.562
RB-1 2.602
RB-3 2.121
Foundation 38.640
Substructure 16.212
3) Abutment: Pedestal 1.281
RB-1 1.301
RB-2 2.522
TOTAL: 386.230
Total Steel Quantity:-

1) Superstructure: 193.682 Ton
2) Substructure : 59.190 Ton
3) Foundation : 133.358 Ton
TOTAL: 386.230 Ton
40
Reinforcement Calculation for the Bridge (11 x20.0)
Name of the structure: Abutment 2

No. of Structures: PIPRA TO GARDI AT CH:3+100KM
Bar Unit
Bar Spacing Length No. of Total Length
Location Bar Description Dia. Shape a b c d e Nos. Wt. Weight (Kg)
Mark (mm) (mm) Elements (mm)
(mm) (Kg/m)
Pile 1 Main bar (Full length) 25 20925 22175 2 80 3548000 3.853 13671.39
b
Pile 2 Main bar (Full length) 25 20925 22175 2 80 3548000 3.853 13671.39
b
b
Pile 4 Ring 16 100 2669 2893 2 128 740608 1.578 1168.90
Pile 3 Helical Ring 10 150 b 349790 349790 2 8 5596640 0.617 3450.46
Bottom Bar-1st Layer

Pile Cap 5 20 125 a b c 900 4130 900 5850 2 82 961740 2.466 2371.74
(Section A-A)
Top Bar-1st Layer

Pile Cap 8+8a 12 250 a b c 900 4630 900 6382 2 42 530982.4 0.888 471.40
(Section A-A)
Top Bar-1st Layer

Pile Cap 9 12 250 a b c 900 4130 900 5882 2 42 489382.4 0.888 434.47
(Section A-A)
Bottom Bar-2nd Layer a b c

Pile Cap 6 20 125 900 10130 900 11850 2 34 810540 2.466 1998.87
(Section B-B)
41
Top Bar-2nd Layer
Pile Cap 10 12 250 a b 900 10130 900 11882 2 18 418246.4 0.888 371.32
(Section B-B) c
Top Bar-2nd Layer

Pile Cap 11 12 250 a b 900 10130 900 11882 2 18 418246.4 0.888 371.32
(Section B-B) c
a
Side Face
Pile Cap 12 12 0.3 10138 0.3 10091 2 16 322899.2 0.888 286.67
Reinforcement
c
c
Pile Cap 60 Chair bar 12 - a b e 1286 600 1286 350 350 3426 2 42 288623.37 0.888 256.24
d
Side Face
Pile Cap 12 12 0.3 4138 0.3 4091 2 16 130899.2 0.888 116.21
Reinforcement a b c
Main bar a
Abutment-1 Shaft 15 12 100 b 300 4715 300 5267 1 84 443481 0.888 393.72
(Section A-A)
c
a
Main bar b
Abutment-1 Shaft 14 16 100 300 4715 300 5251 1 84 442134 1.578 697.82
(Section A-A)
c
Distribution Bar b cc
a
Abutment-1 Shaft 16A (Section B-B/Plan at B- 16 100 613.3 8320 613 9483 1 42 398272 1.578 628.59
B) - Both faces
Distribution Bar b cc
Abutment-1 Shaft 16 (Section B-B/Plan at A- 12 100 a 613.3 8320 613 9499 1 35 336253 0.888 298.52
A) -Both faces
Distribution Bar a
Abutment-1 Shaft 18 (Section A-A/Plan at A- 12 8nos. b c 300 885 300 1437 1 16 22992 0.888 20.41
A,B-B) -Both faces
a
Master Ring/stirrups
Abutment-1 Shaft 17A 12 100 e 920 300 300 920 920 3672 1 589 2164277 0.888 1921.43
(Plan At B-B) c b
d
42
Tie/Link Ring/stirrups
Abutment-1 Shaft 17 10 300 b 920 1080 1 2910 3142670 0.617 1937.53
(Plan At A-A)
Main bar a
Abutment-2 Shaft 15 12 100 300 4410 300 4962 1 84 417800 0.888 370.92
(Section A-A) b
c
Main bar a
Abutment-2 Shaft 14 16 100 b 300 4410 300 4946 1 84 416453 1.578 657.29
(Section A-A)
c
Distribution Bar
Abutment-2 Shaft 16A (Section B-B/Plan at B- 16 100 b cc 613.3 8320 613 9483 1 42 398272 1.578 628.59
a
B) - Both faces
Distribution Bar
b cc
Abutment-2 Shaft 16 (Section B-B/Plan at A- 12 100 a 613.3 8320 613 9499 1 29 278311 0.888 247.08
A) -Both faces
Distribution Bar a
Abutment-2 Shaft 18 (Section A-A/Plan at A- 12 8nos. b c 300 885 300 1437 1 16 22992 0.888 20.41
A,B-B) -Both faces
a
Master Ring/stirrups e
Abutment-2 Shaft 17A 12 100 920 300 300 920 920 3672 1 589 2164277 0.888 1921.43
(Plan At B-B) c b
d
Tie/Link Ring/stirrups
Abutment-2 Shaft 17 10 300 b 920 1080 1 2408 2601137 0.617 1603.66
(Plan At A-A)
a
Master Ring/stirrups c
Abutment Cap 39 10 150 e 1610 920 320 797.6 720 4448 2 51 450686 0.617 277.86
(Section A-A/F-F)
d b
Bottom Bar (Section

Abutment Cap 40 12 8 nos. a b c 480 8320 480 9232 2 8 147712 0.888 131.14
F-F)
Top Bar (Section F-

Abutment Cap 38 16 10 nos. a b c 480 8320 480 9216 2 10 184320 1.578 290.91
F)
Both Side Face Bar 8+10

Abutment Cap 41 12 a b c 300 8320 300 8872 2 18 319392 0.888 283.55
(Section F-F) nos.
43
Dirt Wall and Dirt Wall Distribution
31 12 2 Nos. b 8320 8320 2 2 33280 0.888 29.55
Bracket Bar (Section F-F)
a
Dirt Wall and Dirt Wall vertical bar
32 12 100 b 213.3 3058 798 4020 2 84 677044 0.888 601.08
Bracket (Section F-F) c
a
Dirt Wall and Dirt Wall vertical bar b
33 10 100 213.3 3098 3291 2 84 554186 0.617 341.67
Bracket (Section F-F)
Dirt Wall and Both Side Face Bar

34 10 200 a b c 213.3 8320 213 8707 2 19 337819 0.617 208.27
Bracket (Section F-F)
a
Bracket Main or c
Dirt Wall and
35 Haunch Bar (Section 12 100 b 600 250 300 715 300 2069 2 84 348420 0.888 309.32
Bracket d
F-F) e
b
Dirt Wall and a c
37 Ring(Section F-F) 10 620 8320 620 8320 17980 2 2 71920 0.617 44.34
Bracket d
e
b
Dirt Wall and a c

37 Ring(Section F-F) 10 470 8320 470 8320 17680 2 1 35360 0.617 21.80
Bracket d
Dirt Wall and

36 Binder(Section F-F) 12 b 8320 8320 2 5 83200 0.888 73.86
Bracket d
e
a
Dirt Wall and Vertical Bar b
42 20 110 1560 1670 2 10 33400 2.466 82.37
Bracket Bar(Section G-G) d
e
a
Dirt Wall and Vertical Bar b
43 16 110 1560 1670 2 10 33400 1.578 52.72
Bracket Bar(Section G-G) d
e
a
Return Wall-1(Both Vertical Bar
19 12 b c 300 5230 300 5830 2 3 34980 0.888 31.05
Side Abutment-1) Bar(Section A-A) d
e
a
20 16 100 b c 300 6695 300 7295 2 17 248030 1.578 391.47
Side Abutment-1) Bar(Section A-A)
44
Return Wall-1(Both Horizontal Bar
21 16 100 a b c 300 2570 300 3170 2 26 164840 1.578 260.17
e
a
22 10 100 b c 300 6695 300 7295 2 17 248030 0.617 152.92

23 12 100 a b c 300 2570 300 3170 2 26 164840 0.888 146.34

24 10 200 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 14 60760 0.617 37.46

25 12 200 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 14 60760 0.888 53.94

29 16 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 3 13020 1.578 20.55
de
a
19 12 b c 300 4925 300 5525 2 3 33150 0.888 29.43
e
a
20 16 100 b c 300 6390 300 6990 2 17 237660 1.578 375.10

21 16 100 a b c 300 2570 300 3170 2 23 145820 1.578 230.15
e
a
22 10 100 b c 300 6390 300 6990 2 17 237660 0.617 146.52

23 12 100 a b c 300 2570 300 3170 2 23 145820 0.888 129.46

24 10 200 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 14 60760 0.617 37.46
45
25 12 200 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 14 60760 0.888 53.94

29 16 a b c 300 1570 300 2170 2 3 13020 1.578 20.55
Total wt.(Kg) 54853
Total Weight of the reinforcement for Pile & Pile Cap (HYSD bar) (Ton) 38.64
Total Weight of the reinforcement for Abutment Shaft & Cap & Return wall (HYSD bar) (Ton) 16.21
46
Reinforcement Calculation for the Bridge (11x20)
No. of structure: Pier 10

Name of Structures: PIPRA TO GARDI AT CH:3+100KM
Bar Unit
Bar Spacing Length No. of Total Length
Location Bar Description Dia. Shape a b c d e Nos. Wt. Weight (Kg)
Mark (mm) (mm) Elements (mm)
(mm) (Kg/m)
Main bar
Pile 12 20 20925 21925 10 48 10524000 2.466 25953.14
(Full length) b
Main bar
Pile 12 20 20925 21925 10 48 10524000 2.466 25953.14
(Full length) b
b
Pile 11 Ring 16 100 2669 2893 10 96 2777280 1.578 4383.38
Pile 13 Helical Ring 10 150 b 349790 349790 10 6 20987400 0.617 12939.21
Bottom Bar-1st Layer

Pile Cap 3 20 125 a b c 900 4130 900 5850 10 58 3404700 2.466 8396.30
(Section A-A)
Top Bar-1st Layer

Pile Cap 1 12 100 a b c 900 4130 900 5882 10 73 4264450 0.888 3785.95
(Section A-A)
Bottom Bar-2nd Layer a b c

Pile Cap 4 20 125 900 7130 900 8850 10 34 3026700 2.466 7464.12
(Section B-B)
Top Bar-2nd Layer

Pile Cap 2 12 100 a b c 900 7130 900 8882 10 43 3774850 0.888 3351.28
(Section B-B)
47
Side Face
Pile Cap 5 12 a b 0.3 7138 0.3 7091 10 16 1134496 0.888 1007.20
Reinforcement c
c
Pile Cap 16 Chair bar 12 - a b e 1286 600 1286 350 350 3426 10 30 1016579.85 0.888 902.51
d
a
Side Face
Pile Cap 5 12 0.3 4138 0.3 4091 10 16 654496 0.888 581.06
Reinforcement
c c
Main bar a
Pier-1 Shaft 8 20 b 300 4799 300 5319 1 20 106380 2.466 262.34
(Section A-A)
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-1 Shaft 9 20 300 4799 300 5319 1 6 31914 2.466 78.70
(Section A-A)
c
c aad b
Master Ring (Section
Pier-1 Shaft 7 16 100 c b 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 23 180634 1.578 285.09
C-C) d
Link Bar (Section C-

Pier-1 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 100 108347 0.617 66.80
C)
Main bar a
Pier-2 Shaft 8 20 300 4793 300 5313 1 20 106260 2.466 262.05
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-2 Shaft 9 20 300 4793 300 5313 1 6 31878 2.466 78.61
(Section A-A) c
c aad b
Pier-2 Shaft 7 16 100 b 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 23 180163 1.578 284.35
C-C) c
d

Pier-2 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 100 108115 0.617 66.66
C)
48
Main bar a
Pier-3 Shaft 8 20 300 4995 300 5515 1 20 110300 2.466 272.01
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-3 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4995 300 5515 1 6 33090 2.466 81.60
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-3 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 25 196000 1.578 309.35
C-C) c b
d

Pier-3 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 107 115920 0.617 71.47
C)
Main bar a
Pier-4 Shaft 8 20 300 4686 300 5206 1 20 104120 2.466 256.77
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-4 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4686 300 5206 1 6 31236 2.466 77.03
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-4 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 22 171774 1.578 271.11
C-C) c b
d

Pier-4 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 96 103980 0.617 64.11
C)
Main bar a
Pier-5 Shaft 8 20 300 4797 300 5317 1 20 106340 2.466 262.24
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-5 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4797 300 5317 1 6 31902 2.466 78.67
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-5 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 23 180477 1.578 284.85
C-C) c b
d

Pier-5 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 100 108269 0.617 66.75
C)
49
Main bar a
Pier-6 Shaft 8 20 300 4888 300 5408 1 20 108160 2.466 266.73
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-6 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4888 300 5408 1 6 32448 2.466 80.02
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-6 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 24 187611 1.578 296.11
C-C) c b
d

Pier-6 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 104 111786 0.617 68.92
C)
Main bar a
Pier-7 Shaft 8 20 300 4883 300 5403 1 20 108060 2.466 266.49
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-7 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4883 300 5403 1 6 32418 2.466 79.95
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-7 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 24 187219 1.578 295.49
C-C) c b
d

Pier-7 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 103 111592 0.617 68.80
C)
Main bar a
Pier-8 Shaft 8 20 300 4951 300 5471 1 20 109420 2.466 269.84
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-8 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4951 300 5471 1 6 32826 2.466 80.95
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-8 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 25 192550 1.578 303.90
C-C) c b
d

Pier-8 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 106 114220 0.617 70.42
C)
50
Main bar a
Pier-9 Shaft 8 20 300 4810 300 5330 1 20 106600 2.466 262.89
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-9 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4810 300 5330 1 6 31980 2.466 78.87
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-9 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 23 181496 1.578 286.45
C-C) c b
d

Pier-9 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 101 108772 0.617 67.06
C)
Main bar a
Pier-10 Shaft 8 20 300 4939 300 5459 1 20 109180 2.466 269.25
(Section A-A) b
c
a
Main bar b
Pier-10 Shaft 9 20 c 300 4939 300 5459 1 6 32754 2.466 80.77
(Section A-A)
c aad b
Pier-10 Shaft 7 16 100 2920 920 920 2920 7840 1 24 191610 1.578 302.42
C-C) c b
d

Pier-10 Shaft 10 10 300 b 920 1080 1 105 113756 0.617 70.13
C)
Pier Cap-
1 Top Bar (Section A-A) 20 a b 300 7920 300 8440 10 26 2194400 2.466 5411.59
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 c
Pier Cap-
1a Top Bar (Section A-A) 20 a b 300 3950 4210 10 52 2189200 2.466 5398.77
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10
a
Pier Cap- Master Ring (Section
2 16 200 b 2530 1170 1170 b2530 7560 10 13 982800 1.578 1551.15
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 A-A) c
d
a
Pier Cap-
2a Ring (Section A-A) 12 200 b 1265 1170 1170 1265 4990 10 13 648700 0.888 575.91
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 c
d
51
d
a
Pier Cap- Master Ring (Section
3 16 125 b 2530 845 845 b2530 6910 10 46 3164780 1.578 4994.97
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 A-A) c b
d
a
Pier Cap-
3a Ring (Section A-A) 12 200 b 520 845 845 520 2850 10 58 1653000 0.888 1467.52
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 c
d
a
Pier Cap-
4 Ring (Section A-A) 12 200 b 1040 845 845 1040 3890 10 29 1128100 0.888 1001.52
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 c
d
Pier Cap- Bottom Bar (Section A- d a e

5 12 b c 2591 3000 2591 300 300 8686 10 26 2258360 0.888 2004.96
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 A)
Pier Cap- Mid Span Bar

6 12 a b c 300 7920 300 8472 10 8 677760 0.888 601.71
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 (Section A-A)
Pier Cap- Mid Span Bar

6a 12 a b c 300 5460 300 6012 10 10 601200 0.888 533.74
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 (Section A-A)
Total Wt.(Kg) 125305

Total Weight of the reinforcement for Pile & Pile Cap (HYSD bar) (Ton) 94.72
de cc Total Weight of the reinforcement for Pier Shaft & Cap (HYSD bar) (Ton) 30.59
52
Reinforcement Calculation for the Bridge (11x20.0)
Structure : Pedestal, Arrestor Block 11x20

Name of Structure: PIPRA TO GARDI AT CH:3+100KM
Bar Total
Spacin Length( No. of Uni Wt.
Location Bar Mark Bar Description Dia. Shape a b c d e f Nos. Length Weight (Kg)
g(mm) mm) Element (Kg/m)
(mm) (mm)
a
Vertical Main
Pedestal 48 16 b 270 810 1080 66 12 1.578 1350013 2130.724
Bar(Section H-H)
a
a
Vertical Main
Pedestal 49 12 b 270 810 1080 66 8 0.888 506255 449.450
Bar(Section H-H)
d c
Master Ring(Section H- b
Pedestal 50 12 100 540 620 540 620 2440 66 6 0.888 872118 774.260
H)
a a
b
Pedestal 51 Ring(Section H-H) 10 100 c a 180 620 180 620 1600 66 6 0.617 397139 244.845
d
c a
Pedestal 52 Ring(Section H-H) 10 100 540 207 540 207 1593 66 6 0.617 395485 243.825
b
For Pedestal (Kg): 3843.104
b Pedestal For Abudment (Ton): 1.281
b Pedestal For Pier (Ton) : 2.562
Vertical Bar b
RB-1 42 20 - 110 1560 1670 44 10 2.466 734800 1812.084
Bar(Section G-G)
a
Vertical Bar b
RB-1 43 16 - 110 1560 1670 44 10 1.578 734800 1159.734
Bar(Section G-G)
d
a c
RB-1 44 Horizontal Stirrup 12 150 360 420 360 420 1680 44 6 0.888 380629 337.919
b
a 53
a
Horizontal bar at
RB-1 46 opposite to bearing 12 - 360 420 900 44 2 0.888 70313 62.424
face b
a d
c
b
RB-1 47 Horizontal Stirrup 12 150 180 420 180 420 1320 44 12 0.888 598131 531.016
For RB-1(Kg) : 3903.177

a b RB-1 For Abudment (Ton): 1.301
b RB-1 For Pier (Ton) : 2.602
Horizontal Bar (Trans.

RB-2 53 20 - 150 920 1070 20 10 2.466 214000 527.744
Seismic Stopper) b

RB-2 54 16 - 150 920 1070 20 10 1.578 214000 337.756
Seismic Stopper) b

RB-2 55 16 - 500 920 1420 20 6 1.578 170400 268.942
Seismic Stopper) b
Master Ring(Trans. a c
RB-2 56 12 150 220 620 220 620 1800 20 21 0.888 683956 607.211
Seismic Stopper)
d
Ring(Trans. Seismic
RB-2 57 12 150 a c 220 124 220 124 808 20 21 0.888 307020 272.570
Stopper)
d
b
Ring(Trans. Seismic
RB-2 58 12 150 c 73 620 73 620 1507 20 21 0.888 572496 508.258
Stopper) a
d
For RB-2 (Kg): 2522.481
For RB-2(Ton) : 2.522
54
a
Vertical bar (Section E- b

RB-3 15 20 - 248 1960 248 2455 20 9 2.466 441900 1089.766
E)
c
a
Vertical bar (Section E-
RB-3 16 12 - b 248 1560 248 2055 20 6 0.888 246600 218.930
E)
c
a
Vertical bar (Section E- b
RB-3 17 12 - 248 1560 248 2055 20 9 0.888 369900 328.395
E)
a
Master Ring(Long. b
RB-3 18 12 150 d 495 570 495 570 2250 20 7 0.888 284982 253.005
Seismic Stopper)
c
b
a d c
Ring(Long. Seismic
RB-3 19 10 150 127 495 127 495 1343 20 14 0.617 236309 145.690
Stopper)
a
Ring(Long. Seismic b
RB-3 20 10 150 d 165 570 165 570 1570 20 7 0.617 138093 85.137
Stopper)
c
For RB-3 (Kg): 2120.922

For RB-3 (Ton): 2.121
Total weight of the reinforcement required for Pedestal & Arrester Block (HYSD Bar) (Ton) : 12.390
55
Structure Details: 20m T-Beam
No. of Span: 11
Location
Bar Lep Length Total

Bar Spacing No. of Uni Wt. Weight
Bar Description Dia. Shape a b c d Length of each Nos. of Bar Length
Mark (mm) Element (Kg/m) (Kg)
(mm) (50D) bar (mm)
a1 Girder main 25 - a b C 600 19870 600 1250 22320 22 5 2455200 3.853 9461
a2 Girder main 25 - a b c 600 19870 600 1250 22320 22 5 2455200 3.853 9461
a3 Girder main 25 - a b c 600 19870 600 1250 22320 22 5 2455200 3.853 9461
a4 Girder main 25 - b c 1850 14400 1850 1250 19350 22 3 1277100 3.853 4921
a
a5 Girder main 25 - b c 1850 9600 1850 1250 14550 22 2 640200 3.853 2467
a
Spacer Bar 25 - b 520 520 22 53 601744 3.853 2319
a6 Girder main 16 - a b a 600 19870 600 800 21870 22 2 962280 1.578 1519
a7 Girder main 16 - a b 600 3803 4403 22 2 193732 1.578 306

Long Girder (Outer)
a8 Girder main 12 - b 14400 600 15000 22 14 4620000 0.888 4102
a8a Girder main 12 - b 6420 6420 22 14 1977360 0.888 1755
56
Long Gird
a9 2L Stirrups 12 175 b 520 1495 520 1495 4030 22 55 4863634 0.888 4318
a
a10 2L Stirrups 12 200 b 520 1495 520 1495 4030 22 24 2127840 0.888 1889
a
a11 2L Stirrups 10 200 b 260 1495 260 1495 3510 22 24 1853280 0.617 1143
a
a
a12 Link bar 10 - 100 520 100 720 22 82 1303406 0.617 804
a
a12 Link bar 10 - 100 220 100 420 22 216 1995840 0.617 1230
c
a13 Bulb stirrup 12 200 520 420 1572 2512 22 72 3979008 0.888 3533
b
a
Mesh type M-2 8 600 600 44 16 422400 0.395 167
b1 Girder main 25 - a b C 600 19870 600 1250 22320 11 5 1227600 3.853 4730
b2 Girder main 25 - a b c 600 19870 600 1250 22320 11 5 1227600 3.853 4730
b3 Girder main 25 - a b c 600 19870 600 1250 22320 11 3 736560 3.853 2838
b4 Girder main 25 - b c 1850 14400 1850 1250 19350 11 2 425700 3.853 1640
a
b5 Girder main 25 - b c 1850 9600 1850 1250 14550 11 3 480150 3.853 1850
a
57
b6 Girder main 25 - b c 1850 14400 1850 1250 19350 11 2 425700 3.853 1640
a
Spacer Bar 25 - b 520 520 11 53 300872 3.853 1159
b6 Girder main Top 16 - b 600 19870 600 800 21870 11 2 481140 1.578 759
a a
b7 Girder main 16 - b 600 4753 5353 11 2 117766 1.578 186

a
Long Girder (Inner)
b8 Girder main 12 - 14400 600 15000 11 14 2310000 0.888 2051

b
b8a Girder main 12 - b 6420 6420 11 14 988680 0.888 878
b9 2L Stirrups 12 175 b 520 1495 520 1495 4030 11 55 2431817 0.888 2159
a
b10 2L Stirrups 12 200 b 520 1495 520 1495 4030 11 24 1063920 0.888 945
a
b11 2L Stirrups 10 200 b 260 1495 260 1495 3510 11 24 926640 0.617 571
a
a
b12 Link bar 10 - 100 520 100 720 11 82 651703 0.617 402
a
b12 Link bar 10 - 100 220 100 420 11 216 997920 0.617 615
58
c
b13 Bulb stirrup 12 200 520 420 1572 2512 11 72 1989504 0.888 1766
b
a
Mesh type M-2 8 600 600 22 16 211200 0.395 83
Bottom
S1 B-Short 12 100 6100 6100 11 200 13420000 0.888 11914

b
S2 B-Short 12 200 b 220 3300 3520 11 108 4181760 0.888 3713
S3 B-Longer 12 200 b 2700 2700 11 6 178200 0.888 158
S4 B-Longer 12 b 17000 600 17600 11 3 580800 0.888 516
S5 B-Longer 12 200 b 43000 600 43600 11 3 1438800 0.888 1277
S6 B-Short 12 200 b 220 1500 1720 11 7 132440 0.888 118
s7 B-Longer 12 200 a b c 600 43000 600 600 44800 11 12 5913600 0.888 5250
S8 B-Short 12 200 a b c 600 2700 600 3900 11 31 1329900 0.888 1181
S9 T-Short 16 200 a b c 300 8500 300 800 9900 11 100 10890000 1.578 17188
Deck Slab
59
Deck Slab
S10 T-Short 16 200 a b c 300 8500 300 800 9900 11 100 10890000 1.578 17188
S11 T-Short 16 b 8500 8500 11 3 280500 1.578 443
S11a T-Short 16 b 8500 8500 11 1 93500 1.578 148
S12 T-Longer 12 200 b a 600 21500 600 22700 11 29 7241300 0.888 6429
a
S13 T-Longer 12 200 b a 600 5500 6100 11 29 1945900 0.888 1728

a
S14 T-Longer 12 200 b a 8000 600 8600 11 29 2743400 0.888 2436

a
S15 T-Longer 12 200 b a 600 43000 600 44200 11 3 1458600 0.888 1295
a
S16 T-Longer 16 200 b 43000 43000 11 2 946000 1.578 1493
S17 T-Longer 16 200 b 43000 43000 11 2 946000 1.578 1493
S18 Haunch Bar 12 b 21500 21500 11 8 1892000 0.888 1680
S19 Haunch Bar 12 200 b a 1500 1500 11 215 3547500 0.888 3149
a
S20 Haunch Bar 12 200 b a 250 2000 250 2500 11 107.5 2956250 0.888 2625
a
CRASH
BARRIER
(20m)x6
Distribution Bar 10 20000 500 20500 22 12 5412000 0.617 3337

b
60
b
Ring inner Face 16 120 B 320 800 1120 22 166.6666667 4106667 1.578 6482
a
c
Ring inner Face 16 120 b 320 1150 94 1564 22 166.6666667 5734667 1.578 9051
a
c
Ring outer Face 12 120 320 1050 94 1464 22 166.6666667 5368000 0.888 4766
b
a a
Hook 8 1000 b b 100 400 100 600 22 20 264000 0.395 104
CRASH BARRIER
CRASH
BARRIER
(3.5m)x4
Distribution Bar 10 b 3.5 3.5 4 12 168 0.617 0
Ring inner Face 16 120 B 320 800 1120 4 30 134400 1.578 212
a
c
61
a
c
Ring inner Face 16 120 b 320 1150 94 1564 4 30 187680 1.578 296
a
c
Ring outer Face 12 120 320 1050 94 1464 4 30 175680 0.888 156
b
a a
Hook 8 1000 b b 100 400 100 600 4 4 9600 0.395 4
Total Wt.(Kg) 193682
Total Wt.(Ton) 193.68
62
RATE ANALYSIS
63
QUARY CHART
PIPRA To GARDI
Stone Boulder
Place :- Sheikhpura
By Rail :- 220.00km
By Road :- 89.00km
Bricks Stone Metal Gr-II

Place :- Local Place :- Sheikhpura
By Rail :- 0 By Rail :- 220.00km
By Road (Surface) :- 7 By Road :- 89.00km
By Road (Kachha):- 1
Stone Metal GSB
Place :- Sheikhpura
By Rail :- 0.00km
By Road :- 231.00km
Stone Aggregate (Chips),Gr-III

Place :- Bettiah
By Rail :- 330.00km
By Road :- 89.00km
Construction Of RCC HL Bridge
At Ch 3+100 KM in PIPRA To
Course Sand
GARDI Road over River Place :- Koilwar
By Rail :- 0.00km
By Road :- 257.00km
Cement / Steel
Place :- Bettiah
By Rail :- 0.00km
By Road :- 10.00km
Local Sand Bitumen

Place :- Local Place :- Muzaffarpur
By Rail :- 0 By Rail :- 0.00km
By Road (Surface) :- 2 By Road :- 57.00km
By Road (Kachha):- 1
Bitumen Emulsion
Morrum Place :- Muzaffarpur
Place :- Bettiah By Rail :- 0.00km
By Rail :- 0.00km By Road :- 57.00km
By Road (Surface) :- 89.00km
Hume Pipe
Place :- Bettiah
By Rail :- 0.00km
By Road :- 38.00km
J.E A.E. E.E.

RWD, (w), Division RWD, (w), Division RWD, (w), Division
RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1 RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1

RWD (w) Division, Bagha - 1
64
Analysis for Carriage by Road & Rail
Name of Road:-- PIPRA To GARDI
District:- West Champaran Block :- Ramnagar
Carriage Cost & Lead in Km Loading & Carriage

Sl
Item with Source Unit Source Up to Unloading Cost by Total `
No Pucka / Surface Katcha Cost Rail Head
Material -Stone Metal ,Gr- 8.00 8.00
1 Cum Bettiah
4.59 x 11.80 x 89.00 Km = Rs 1830.41 4.59 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 1464.53 Rs. 3412.96
I & Gr-II
Material -Stone Metal 8.00 8.00
2 Cum Bettiah x 11.80 x 89.00 Km = Rs 1683.69 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 1372.00 Rs. 3173.72
GSB 4.99 4.99
Material -Stone 8.00 8.00
Aggregate Chips, Gr-III 4.99 4.99
8.00 8.00
4 Material -Stone Boulder Cum Bettiah x 11.80 x 89.00 Km = Rs 1750.33 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 1414.03 Rs. 3282.38
4.80 4.80
8.00 8.00
5 Course Sand Cum Koilwar x 7.25 x 257.00 Km = Rs 2988.21 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 103.97 Rs. 3092.18
4.99 4.99
Binding 8.00 8.00
Material/Moorum 6.00 6.00
8.00 8.00
7 Local Sand Cum Local x 7.25 x 2.00 Km = Rs 23.25 x 17.55 x 1.00 Km = Rs 28.14 103.97 Rs. 155.36
4.99 4.99
8.00 8.00
8 Brick 1000 Nos Local x 7.25 x 7.00 Km = Rs 203.07 x 17.55 x 1.00 Km = Rs 70.21 436.58 Rs. 709.86
2.00 2.00
8.00 8.00
9 Cement MT Bettiah x 7.25 x 10.00 Km = Rs 72.53 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 317.88 Rs. 390.41
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
10 Steel MT Bettiah x 7.25 x 10.00 Km = Rs 72.53 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 339.27 Rs. 411.80
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
11 Bitumen Emulsion MT Muzaffarpur x 7.25 x 57.00 Km = Rs 413.39 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 363.18 Rs. 776.57
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
12 Bitumen MT Muzaffarpur x 7.25 x 57.00 Km = Rs 413.39 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 363.18 Rs. 776.57
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
13 Hume Pipe(1000 mm ) m Bettiah x 7.25 x 38.00 Km = Rs 220.48 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.36 Rs. 338.84
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
13 Structural Steel MT Bettiah x 7.25 x 38.00 Km = Rs 275.60 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 339.27 Rs. 614.87
Cost of Haulage Excluding Loading & Unloading as per SOR * Subjected to Verification of Lead
` Per Ton. Km by Tipper ` Per Ton. Km by
Type of Road
Truck
For Surface Road 11.80 7.25
Unsurface Gravel Road 14.20 8.72
Kachha Road 28.50 17.55
65
Analysis for Carriage by Road
District:- West Champaran Block :- Ramnagar
Carriage Cost & Lead in Km Loading &

Sl No Item with Source Unit Source Up to Unloading Total `
Pucka / Surface Katcha Cost
Material -Stone Metal Gr- 8.00 8.00
1 Cum Sheikhpura
4.59 x 11.80 x 231.00 Km = Rs 4750.85 4.59 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 Rs. 4868.87
I & Gr-II
Material -Stone Metal 8.00 8.00
2 Cum Sheikhpura x 11.80 x 231.00 Km = Rs 4370.02 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 Rs. 4488.04
GSB 4.99 4.99
Material -Stone 8.00 8.00
3 Cum Mirza Chauki x 11.80 x 359.00 Km = Rs 6791.50 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 Rs. 6909.52
Aggregate Chips, Gr-III 4.99 4.99
8.00 8.00
4 Material -Stone Boulder Cum Sheikhpura x 11.80 x 231.00 Km = Rs 5451.60 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.02 Rs. 5569.62
4.00 4.00
8.00 8.00
5 Course Sand Cum Koilwar x 7.25 x 257.00 Km = Rs 2988.21 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 103.97 Rs. 3092.18
4.99 4.99
Binding 8.00 8.00
6 Cum Bettiah x 11.80 x 231.00 Km = Rs 3634.40 x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 103.97 Rs. 3738.37
Material/Moorum 6.00 6.00
8.00 8.00
7 Local Sand Cum Local x 7.25 x 2.00 Km = Rs 23.25 x 17.55 x 1.00 Km = Rs 28.14 103.97 Rs. 155.36
4.99 4.99
8.00 8.00
8 Brick 1000 Nos Local x 7.25 x 7.00 Km = Rs 203.07 x 17.55 x 1.00 Km = Rs 70.21 436.58 Rs. 709.86
2.00 2.00
8.00 8.00
9 Cement MT Bettiah x 7.25 x 10.00 Km = Rs 72.53 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 317.88 Rs. 390.41
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
10 Steel MT Bettiah x 7.25 x 10.00 Km = Rs 72.53 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 339.27 Rs. 411.80
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
11 Bitumen Emulsion MT Muzaffarpur x 7.25 x 57.00 Km = Rs 413.39 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 363.18 Rs. 776.57
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
12 Bitumen MT Muzaffarpur x 7.25 x 57.00 Km = Rs 413.39 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 363.18 Rs. 776.57
8.00 8.00
8.00 8.00
13 Hume Pipe (1000 mm ) m Bettiah x 7.25 x 38.00 Km = Rs 220.48 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 118.36 Rs. 338.84
10.00 10.00
8.00 8.00
14 Structural Steel MT Bettiah
8.00 x 7.25 x 38.00 Km = Rs 275.60 8.00 x 17.55 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 339.27 Rs. 614.87
Cost of Haulage Excluding Loading & Unloading as per SOR * Subjected to Verification of Lead
` Per Ton. Km by Tipper ` Per Ton. Km by
Type of Road
Truck
For Surface Road 11.80 7.25
Unsurface Gravel Road 14.20 8.72
Kachha Road 28.50 17.55
66
Analysis for Carriage by Road & Rail

Block :- Ramnagar
District:- West Champaran
Carriage Cost By Carriage Cost By Minimum Carriage Cost

Sl No Item Unit
Road (Per cum) Road & Rail (Per cum) (Addopted in DPR)
1 Stone Metal Gr-I & Gr-II Cum 4868.87 3412.96 3412.96
2 Stone Metal GSB Cum 4488.04 3173.72 3173.72

Material -Stone Aggregate
3 Cum 6909.52 3481.39 3481.39
Chips, Gr-III
4 Stone Boulder Cum 5569.62 3282.38 3282.38
5 Course Sand Cum 3092.18 3092.18 3092.18
6 Binding Material (Moorum) Cum 3738.37 2143.82 2143.82
7 Local Sand Cum 155.36 155.36 155.36
8 Brick 1000 Nos 709.86 709.86 709.86
9 Cement MT 390.41 390.41 390.41
10 Steel MT 411.80 411.80 411.80
11 Bitumen Emulsion MT 776.57 776.57 776.57
12 Bitumen MT 776.57 776.57 776.57
13 Hume Pipe (1000 mm ) Pipe 338.84 338.84 338.84
14 Structural Steel MT 614.87 614.87 614.87
Junior Engineer Asstt. Engineer Executive Engineer

67
Analysis for Carrige Through Railway from Quarry Site to Work Site
Sheikhpura to Bettiah
Material -Stone Metal Gr-I & Gr-II
Quarry Site to Sheikhpura Railway Yard (By Road)

Total
Pucka / Surface Katcha Unloading
8.00 8.00
x 11.80 x 4.00 Km = Rs 82.27 + x 28.50 x 0.00 Km = Rs 0.00 + Rs 118.02 = Rs 200.29
4.59 4.59
8.00
UnSurface x 14.20 x 1.00 Km = Rs 24.75
4.59
Total "A" = Rs 225.04
Sheikhpura Railway Yard to Bettiah Railway Yard = 220
i) Loading Cost from Railway Yard to Railway Wegon = For 1 cum = Rs 128.18 = Rs 128.18
Total = For 1 cum "B" = Rs 128.18
ii) Railway freight charge from Sheikhpura Railway station to = For 1 MT 220.00 Km = 388.1 = Rs 388.10
Busy Seasion charge 12% of Railway freight charge = For 1 MT = 12% = Rs 46.57
Railway Development Charge to 5% of Railway freight For 1 MT = 5% = Rs 19.41
Terminal charge @Rs.40.00 per Terminal per MT For 1 MT 2 x Rs 40.00 = Rs 80.00
Total = For 1 MT = Rs 534.08

For 1 cum "C" = Rs 930.86
Add 12.5% Overhead Charge & Contractor Profit = 12.5% = Rs 116.36
Total Railway Freight for 1 cum "C" = Rs 1047.22

Cost for Stacking the Materials from Unloding dump upto lead
30 m.
Total "D" = For 1 cum = Rs 64.09 = Rs 64.09
Carriage Cost from Quarry to Bettiah Railway Yard = For 1 Cum A+B+C+D = Rs 1464.53
68
Material -Stone Metal Gr-III

Total
8.00 8.00
4.99 4.99
8.00
4.99
Total "A" = Rs 216.46
Sheikhpura Railway Yard to Bettiah Railway Yard = 220.00 Km
Total = For 1 cum "B" = Rs 128.18
ii) Railway freight charge from Sheikhpura Railway station to

Bettiah Railway station
= For 1 MT 220.00 Km = Rs 388.10 = Rs 388.10
Busy Seasion charge 12% of railway freight charge = For 1 MT = 12% = Rs 46.57
Railway Development Charge to 5% of Railway Freight

Charge For 1 MT = 5% = Rs 19.41
For 1 CUM "C" = Rs 856.24
Total Railway Freight for 1 cum "C" Rs 963.27

30 m.
Total "D" = For 1 cum = Rs 64.09 = Rs 64.09
69
Mirzachowki to Bettiah
Material -Stone Aggregate / Chips
Quarry Site to Mirzachowki Railway Yard (By Road)

Total
8.00 8.00
4.99 4.99
8.00
4.99
Total "A" = Rs 216.46
Mirzachowki Railway Yard to Bettiah Railway Yard = 330
Total = For 1 Cum "B" = Rs 128.18
ii) Railway freight charge from Mirzachowki Railway station to

Bettiah Railway station = For 1 MT 330.00 Km = 533.9 = Rs 533.90
Railway Development Charge to 5% of Railway Fright

Charge For 1 MT = 5% = Rs 26.70
For 1 CUM "C" = Rs 1129.73

30 m.
Total "D" = For 1 CUM = Rs 64.09 = Rs 64.09
70
Material -Stone Boulder

Total
8.00 8.00
4.80 4.80
8.00
4.80
Total "A" = Rs 220.36
Total = For 1 CUM "B" = Rs 128.18
ii) Railway freight charge from Sheikhpura Railway station to = For 1 MT 220.00 Km = Rs 388.10 = Rs 388.10
Railway Development Charge to 5% of Railway Fright For 1 MT = 5% = Rs 19.41
For 1 CUM "C" = Rs 890.14

30 m.
Carriage Cost from Quarry to Bettiah Railway Yard = For 1 Cum =A+B+C+D = Rs 1414.03
71
Material -Binding Material / Moorum

Total
8.00 8.00
6.00 6.00
8.00
6.00
Total "A" = Rs 185.83
Total = For 1 CUM "B" = Rs 128.18
iii) Railway freight charge from Sheikhpura Railway station to = For 1 MT 220.00 Km = Rs 388.10 = Rs 388.10
Railway Development Charge to 5% of Railway Fright For 1 MT = 5% = Rs 19.41
For 1 CUM "C" = Rs 712.11

30 m.
Carriage Cost from Quarry to Bettiah Railway Yard

= For 1 Cum =A+B+C+D = Rs 1179.22
72
Summary of Carriage Cost
PIPRA To GARDI
Sl. Amount
Materials Unit
No. (Rs.)
1 Gr-III Cum 3481.39
2 Stone Metal Below 40 mm Cum 3173.72
3 Stone Chips Cum 3481.39
4 Screening Materials Cum 3481.39
5 Gr-II Cum 3412.96
6 Stone Metal above 40 mm Cum 3412.96
7 Binding Material (Moorum) Cum 2143.82
8 Coarse Sand Cum 3092.18
10 Local sand Cum 155.36
11 Boulder Cum 3282.38
12 Cement Ton 390.41
14 Bitumen ( S-90 ) Ton 776.57
15 Bitumen Emulsion SS & RS Ton 776.57
16 Steel Ton 411.80
17 Structural Steel Ton 614.87
73
BASIC RATES
(A) Labour
PIPRA To GARDI
Sl. No. Description of Labour Unit Rate (Rs.)
L-01 Bhisti day 306.00
L-02 Bitumen Sprayer day 322.00
L-03 Blacksmith day 413.00
L-04 Blaster day 508.00
L-05 Carpenter 1st Class day 413.00
L-06 Chips spreader day 369.00
L-07 Chiseller day 474.00
L-08 Dresser (Skilled) day 388.00
L-09 Driller day 318.00
L-10 Electrician day 391.00
L-11 Fitter day 420.00
L-12 Mason (1st class) day 413.00
L-13 Mason (2nd Class) day 369.00
L-14 Mate day 325.00
L-15 Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 306.00
L-16 Mazdoor (Semi skilled) day 318.00
L-17 Mazdoor (Skilled) day 388.00
L-18 Painter (Ist class) day 391.00
L-19 Plumber day 373.00
L-20 Surveyor day 373.00
L-21 White Washer day 388.00
L-02 B Welder day 463.00
74
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Basic Rate Final Rate
Sl. No. Description Unit Exclusive Including
Royality Royality
M-001 AC pipe 100 mm 42.54 42.54

m
M-002 Aggregate - For 37.5 mm Maximum size - 22.4 mm to 5.6 mm 572.92 572.92
cum
M-003 Aggregate - For 37.5 mm Maximum size - 45 mm to 22.5 mm 524.49 524.49

cum
M-004 Aggregate - For 37.5 mm Maximum size - Below 5.6 mm 249.22 249.22
cum
M-005 Aggregate - For 53 mm Maximum size - 22.5 mm to 5.6 mm 572.92 572.92

cum
M-006 Aggregate - For 53 mm Maximum size - 63 mm to 45 mm 473.70 473.70

cum
M-007 Aggregate - For 53 mm Maximum size - Below 5.6 mm 249.22 249.22

cum
M-008 Aggregate - Grading I (40 mm nominal Size) 10 mm - 5 mm 573.71 573.71

cum
M-009 Aggregate - Grading I (40 mm nominal Size) 25 mm – 10 mm 656.34 656.34

cum
M-010 Aggregate - Grading I (40 mm nominal Size) 37.25 mm - 25 mm 524.49 524.49

cum
M-011 Aggregate - Grading I (40 mm nominal Size) 5 mm and below 249.22 249.22
cum
M-012 Aggregate - Grading II (19 mm nominal Size) 10 mm - 5 mm 573.71 573.71

cum
M-013 Aggregate - Grading II (19 mm nominal Size) 25 mm – 10 mm 656.34 656.34

cum
M-014 Aggregate - Grading II (19 mm nominal Size) 5 mm and below 249.22 249.22
cum
M-015 Crushed Stone chipping 13.2 mm nominal size 515.53 515.53
Aggregate -13.2 mm to 0.09 mm 523.37 523.37
M-015 Aggregate 10 mm 657.91 657.91

cum
M-016 Aggregate 20 mm 595.36 595.36

cum
M-017 Aggregate 40 mm 486.92 486.92

cum
Aggregate- Crushable type such as moorum or Gravel for
M-018 158.35 158.35
Grading I cum
M-019 158.35 158.35
Grading II cum
75
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Royality Royality

M-020 158.35 158.35
Grading III cum
M-021 Aggregate-Grading I 90 mm to 45 mm 442.63 442.63

cum
M-022 Aggregate-Grading II 63 mm to 45 mm 473.70 473.70

cum
M-023 Aggregate-Grading III 53 mm to 22.4 mm 503.85 503.85

cum
M-024 Aggregates 22.4 mm to 2.36 mm for wet mix macadam 572.92 572.92
cum
M-025 Aggregates 45 mm to 22.4 mm for wet mix macadam 524.49 524.49

cum
M-026 Binding Material 158.35 158.35

cum
M-027 Binding wire 58.95 58.95

kg
M-028 Bitumen (Crumb Rubber Modified) -

tonne
M-029 Bitumen (Natural Rubber Modified) -

tonne
Bitumen (S-65) (Barauni) (Excluding the cost of empty
M-030 54,206.82 54,206.82
drum @ Rs. 798.78 / Per MT ) t
Bitumen (S-90) (Barauni) (Excluding the cost of empty
M-031 53,406.82 53,406.82
drum @ Rs. 798.78 / Per MT ) t
Bitumen Emulsion (RS-1) (Muzaffarpur) (Excluding the
M-032 54,823.82 54,823.82
cost of empty drum @ Rs. 798.78 / Per MT ) t
Bitumen Emulsion (SS-1) (Muzaffarpur) (Excluding the
M-033 53,791.82 53,791.82
cost of empty drum @ Rs.798.78 / Per MT ) t
M-034 Bituminous sealant 24.51 24.51

litre
M-035 Bond stone (400 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm) 10.51 10.51

No.
M-036 Brick 1st Class 6.08 6.08

No.
M-037 Opc -43 grade Cement (Excluding Empty Cement Bag Cost 7.46) 5,006.40 5,006.40
t
M-038 Cement Primer 122.56 122.56

litre
M-039 Compensation for earth taken from private land 34.82 34.82
cum
M-040 Corrosion Resistant Structural Steel Grating 43.85 43.85

kg
76
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Royality Royality
Crushed Sand or Grit Passing 2.36 mm and retained on 180

M-041 234.89 234.89
micron cum
M-042 Crushed Stone Aggregate 26.5 mm to 75 micron 553.36 553.36

cum

cum
Crushed Stone Chipping 6.7 mm size 100% passing 11.2 mm
M-044 454.98 454.98
and retained on 2.36 mm cum
Crushed Stone Chipping 6.7 mm size 100% passing 9.5 mm and
M-045 454.98 454.98
retained on 2.36 mm cum

cum
Crushed Stone Coarse Aggregate Passing 53 mm and retained
M-047 516.41 516.41
on 2.8 mm cum
M-048 Curing compound 123.05 123.05

litre
M-049 Debonding strips 45.00 45.00

m
M-050 Epoxy Paint 568.30 568.30

litre
M-051 Epoxy Primer 114.14 114.14

litre
M-052 Farmyard manure 552.00 552.00

cum
M-053 Fevicol adhesive 125.00 125.00

kg
M-054 Filter media 504.46 504.46

cum
M-055 Fine aggregate/Crushed sand 2.36 mm to 75 micron 119.10 119.10

cum
M-056 GI Pipe 50 mm dia 522.42 522.42

m
Granular material (Natural occuring, soil gravel mixture /
M-057 163.53 163.53
quarry waste, kankar, laterite, dhandla cum
M-058 Indigo 416.00 416.00

kg
M-059 Joint filler board 961.32 961.32

sqm
M-060 Jute rope 12 mm dia 961.32 961.32

m
M-061 Lime 3,637.51 3,637.51

t
77
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Royality Royality
M-062 MS clamps 34.06 34.06

Nos.
M-063 MS Sheet Tube (47 mm x 47 mm x 12 SWG Sheet) 43.62 43.62

kg
M-064 MS Sheet 1.6 mm thick 416.00 416.00

sqm
M-065 MS Sheet 2 mm thick 832.00 832.00

sqm
M-066 Plasticizer 159.51 159.51

litre
M-067 Polythene sheet (125 micron) 15.02 15.02

sqm
M-068 RCC Pipe NP3 (1200 mm dia) 6,510.00 6,510.00

m

m

m

m

m

m
M-074 Sand (Coarse) 175.80 175.80

cum
M-075 Sand (Fine) 141.85 141.85

cum
M-178 Strip Seal Expansion Joint 8,389.05 8,389.05

mtr.
M-076 Steel Reinforcement (HYSD Bars) 54,809.75 54,809.75

t
M-077 Steel Reinforcement (MS Round Bars) 54,809.75 54,809.75

t
M-078 Steel Reinforcement (TMT Bars) 54,809.75 54,809.75

t
M-079 Stone Boulder of size 150 mm and below 351.36

cum 351.36
M-080 Stone for Random Rubble Masonry 336.55

cum 336.55
M-081 Stone Screening - Type B 11.2 mm for Grading-2 392.53

cum 392.53
78
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Royality Royality
M-082 Stone Screening - Type B 11.2 mm for Grading-3 392.53

cum 392.53
M-083 Stone spall 351.36

cum 351.36
M-084 Water 40.00

kl 40.00
M-085 Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading A 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading A 26.5 mm to
M-086 544.89
4.75 mm cum 544.89
Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading A 53 mm to 26.5
M-087 503.85
mm cum 503.85
M-088 Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading B 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading B 26.5 mm to
M-089 544.89
4.75 mm cum 544.89
M-090 Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading C 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
Well graded Granular Base Material - Grading C 9.5 mm to 4.75
M-091 573.71
mm cum 573.71
M-092 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading I 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
M-093 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading I 53 mm to 9.5 mm 610.74

cum 610.74
Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading I 9.5 mm to 2.36
M-094 506.92
mm cum 506.92
M-095 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading II 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading II 26.5 mm to 9.5
M-096 647.19
mm cum 647.19
M-097 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading II 9.5 mm to 2.36 mm 506.92
cum 506.92
M-098 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading III 2.36 mm below 234.89
cum 234.89
M-099 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading III 4.75 mm to 2.36 mm 249.22
cum 249.22
M-100 Well Graded Material for Sub-Base - Grading III 9.5 mm to 4.75 mm 573.71
cum 573.71
M-106 Paint (Synthetic Enamel) 224.02

litre 224.02
M-102 MS Sheet Tube (47 mm x 47 mm x 12 SWG Sheet) 43.62

kg 43.62
79
BASIC RATES
(B) Material
Royality Royality
M-101 MS Flat / Structural Steel 46,658.00

t 46,658.00
M-103 MS Sheet 1.6 mm thick 416.00

sqm 416.00
M-159 Sand Bag (Cost of sand & Empty Cement Bag) Each 8.46
8.46
Bentonite 3.63
Kg 3.63
Admixture 152.14
Kg 152.14
Pot type bearing assembly consisting of a metal piston supported

M-68 by a disc, PTFE pads providing sliding surfaces against stainless 136.66
steel mating together with cast steel assemblies/fabricated
structural steel assemblies duly painted with all components as Nos. 136.66
Elastomeric bearing assembly consisting of 7 layers of elastomer
M-66 bonded to 6 nos. internal reinforcing steel laminates by the 0.59
process of vulcanisation, complete with all components as per Cubic cm 0.59
drawing and Technical Specifications.
M-059 Crushed Stone chipping 13.2 mm nominal size 686.05
cum 686.05
RCD Hot Applied Thermoplastic compound (Sp. Gravity - 2.10) 183.25

Liter 183.25
RCD Reflectorising Glass Beads 65.04

Kg 65.04
Stone spall 351.36

cum 351.36
15000 15,000.00
Waste Plastic Tonne
80
BASIC RATES
(C) USAGE RATES OF PLANT & MACHINERY
Description of Output of Machine Usage Rates in Rs.
Sr. No.
Machine Activity Unit Output Unit Rate
Supplying compressed
PM-001 Air Compressor 210 cfm cfm 210 391.00
air per hour
Batching and mixing plant @ 30 cum
PM-002 Concrete Mixing Cum/h 20 2,981.00
capacity per hour
HMP 30/40 t 18,776.00
PM-002 Batch mix HMP 40-60 TPH BM, DBM, SDBC, PM t/h 50 18,776.00
per hour
PM-003 Batch type HMP 30/40 TPH BM, DBM, SDBC, PM t/h 35 18,776.00
per hour
PM-004 Bitumen boiler oil fired
200 litre Heating of bitumen litre / h 400 per hour 510.00
1000 litre litre / h 2000 510.00

per hour
Applying bitumen tack
PM-005 Bitumen emulsion pressure distributor sqm/h 1750 283.00
coat per hour
PM-006 Concrete mixer 0.28/0.4 cum Mixing of ingradients cum/h 2.5 1,289.30
per hour
PM-007 Crane (b) 35T Lifting of materials 2,930.00

per hour
Crane WITH GRAB 0.75 CUM Hire & Running charge 3m 1,925.00
PM-075 CAPACITY grab 0.75 hour hour
PM-008 cum/h 200 2,930.00
Dozer D 50 Dozing cutting
cum/h 100 per hour 1,587.00
PM-009 Electric generator set, 125 KVA Electricity generation KVA 100 1,359.00
per hour
PM-001 Electric generator set, 100 KVA Electricity generation KVA 100 869.00
per hour
PM-010 Electric generator set, 63 KVA Electricity generation 495.00

KVA 50 per hour
562.00
Electric generator set, 33 KVA Electricity generation per hour
PM-011 1,645.00
Emulsion Sprayer with Tractor Spraying of Emulsion per hour
Loading
Aggregates/Loading 1,594.00
Front end-loader 1 cum bucket capacity @Soil
45 cum/hour cum/h 45 per hour
PM-012 Hydraulic broom with tractor Surface cleaning sqm/h 1250 per hour 746.00
PM-013 Hydraulic Excavator 0.9 cum 2,202.00

Excavation cum/h 100 per hour
PM-014 Hydraulic self propelled chip spreader 1,602.00

Surface Dressing sqm/h 1500 per hour
81
BASIC RATES
Sr. No.
PM-015 Jack Hammer with tractor Pavement breaking & 1,289.30

rock drilling cum/h 05. to 1 per hour
PM-016 Joint Cutting Machine with 2-3 blades 293.00

Cutting of Joints h per hour
PM-017 Mixall 6-10 t capacity Mixing of bituminous 3,702.00

materials t/h 8 per hour
PM-018 Motor Grader 200 per hour 2,982.00
Tractor mounted grader Scarifier & levelling cum/h 50 573.20
PM-019 Needle vibrator Vibrating cement 325.00

concrete mix cum/h 3.5 per hour
PM-020 Paver finisher 2,078.00

Laying/spreading t/h 75 per hour
PM-021 Plate compactor 335.00

Compaction cum/h per hour
PM-022 Plate vibrator 335.00

PM-023 Screed vibrator 102.64

PM-024 Smooth wheeled 80-100 kN tandem roller Compaction of Sub- 1,518.00

base/ Asphalt cum/h per hour
PM-025 Stone crusher (Integrated) of 200 TPH 13,481.00

Crushing of Spalls cum/h 30 per hour
PM-026 Three wheel 80-100 kN Static Roller 1,518.00

Compaction/ Rolling t/h 200 per hour
Earth:- Embankment or
cum/h 80/70 1,518.00
sub-grade
Sub-base G-I cum/h 10 1,518.00
Sub-base G-II/G-III cum/h 8 1,518.00
WMM cum/h 16 1,518.00
BUSG cum/h 10 1,518.00
BM 50/75 mm cum/h 12 1,518.00
Premix 20 mm sqm/h 250 1,518.00
Seal Coat sqm/h 500 1,518.00
Surface Dressing 1st

sqm/h 400 1,518.00
Coat
82
BASIC RATES
Sr. No.
Surface Dressing
sqm/h 500 1,518.00
2ndCoat per hour
PM-027 Tipper 5.5 cum/10 t Carriage cum/trip 5.5 1,518.00

per hour
PM-028 Tractor with Disc Harrows Pulverisation of soil cum/h 80 612.00

per hour
Ripping Pavements,
PM-029 Tractor with ripper @ 60 cum per hour cum/h 60 591.40
uprooting trees
per hour
Tractor with trolley/with Grading Transportation of
PM-030 t/trip 3 to 5 629.00
equipment materials per hour
PM-031 Tractor with Rotavator Scarifier cum/h 25 573.20

per hour
PM-032 Truck 10 t capacity Carriage cum/trip 5.5 934.30

per hour
Compaction of soil
PM-033 cum/h 100 1,978.00
WMM
Vibratory roller 80-100 kN
Compaction of BM cum/h 60 1,978.00
per hour
Water tanker 6 kl capacity (Truck
PM-034 Carriage of water 12000 707.00
Mounted) litre / h per hour
Wet mix plant (Pug Mill) Wet Mix 25 1,822.30

35 cum/h per hour
0.75 m dia to 1.2 m dia
2 to 3 17,135.00
P& M-36 Pilling Rig with Bantonite Pump boring attahment RM/Hour per hour
Soil loading/Aggregate 60/25 1,594.00
P& M-37 Front End loader 1 cum bucket capacit looding cum/hour per hour
Transportation of
4.5 1,406.00
P& M-36 Transit Mixer 4/4.5 cum Concrete Mix to site cum/hour per hour
Transportation of
Concrete Mix to site 4.5 6.94
P& M-38 Transit Mixer 4.0/4.5 cum Lead 1-km cum/h tonne.km
Concrete Pump of 45 & 30 cum capacit Pumping of concrete cum/hour 33/22 per hour 960.00
Road marking machine @ 80 sqm per
hour 100 per hour 1,349.00
sqm/h
RCD
100 141.80
Road marking machine Road marking Sqm/h per hour
30 40,270.00
Hot Mix Plant - 100 TPH DBM/BM/SDBC/Premix Cum/h per hour
Paving of
40 6,346.00
Sensor Paver Finisher DBM/BM/SDBC/Premix Cum/h per hour
Generation of Electric 200 3,034.00
250 KVA Generator Set Energy KVA per hour
83
BASIC RATES
Sr. No.
Transportation of Soil,
GSB, WMM, Hotmix Capacity 5.5 9.07
Tipper 5 Cum etc. in Cum Tonne.Km
Rolling of Aspalt
30 1,978.00
Tandem Road Roller Surface Cum/h per hour
84
SDB Sl. MORD Analysis of Rates ( FORMAT F8 ) Amount
Sl. No. DESCRIPTION Unit Quantity Rate
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Haulage BY TIPPER
1 1.10 (i) Haulage excluding Loading & Unloading
Haulage of materials by tipper excluding cost of loading, unloading and
stacking.
Unit = t.km
Taking output 10 t load and lead 10 km = 100 t.km
Case-I : Surfaced Road
Speed with load: 25 km per hour
Speed while returning empty: 35 km per hour
a) Machinery
Tipper 10 t capacity
Haulage with load hour 0.40 1518.00 607.20
Empty return trip hour 0.29 1518.00 440.22
b) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a) 130.93
Cost for 100 t-km = a+b+c 1,178.35
Rate per cum = (a+b+c) /100 11.78
Rate Per Km. Cum 11.80
2 1.10 (ii) Haulage excluding Loading & Unloading
stacking.
Unit = t.km
Case-II: Unsurfaced Gravel Road.
Speed with load: 20 km/hour
Speed for empty return trip: 30 km/hour
a) Machinery
Cost for 100 t-km = a+b+c 1,417.43
Rate per cum = (a+b+c) /100 14.17
3 1.10 (iii) Haulage excluding Loading & Unloading
stacking.
Unit = t.km
Case-III : Katcha Track and Track in River Bed/Nallah Bed and Choe
Bed.
Speed with load: 10 km per hour
Speed while returning empty: 15 km per hour
a) Machinery
Haulage with load hour 1.00 1518.00 1,518.00
Empty return trip hour 0.67 1518.00 1,017.06
Cost for 100 t-km = a+b+c 2,851.94
Rate per cum = (a+b+c) /100 28.52
4 ( ii ) Loading of Earth, Sand, Moorum, Manure, Flyash by manual means
including a lead up to 30m
Unit = cum
Taking output = 5.5 cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.01 325.00 3.25
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 0.25 306.00 76.50
b) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity hour 0.25 934.30 233.58
c) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b) 39.17
Cost for 5.5 cum = a+b+c 352.49
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/5.5 cum 64.09
5 ( iv ) Unoading of Earth, Sand, Moorum, Manure, Flyash by manual means
including a lead up to 30m
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.005 325.00 1.63
b) Machinery
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/5.5 cum 39.88
6 1.2 Loading and Unloading Lime, Aggregate, Stone Boulder, Brick
85
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
i Haulage
Loading of Lime, Aggregate, Stone Boulder, BrickBY TIPPER
Aggregate,
Unit = cum
Time required for
i Positioning of tipper at loading point Min 1.000
ii Loading by front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity @ 45 cum per Min 7.330
iii Waiting time, unforeseen contingencies, etc. Min 2.000
Total Min 10.330
a) Machinery
Tipper 10 t capacity hour 0.172 1518.00 261.10
Front end-loader 1 cum bucket capacity @ 45 cum per hour hour 0.122 1594.00 194.47
b) Overheads & Contractor’s profit@ 12.5 % 56.95
C Contractors Profit @ 10.0 % 0.00
Cost for 5.5 cum = a+b+C 512.51
Rate per cum = (a+b)/5.5 93.18
Unloading of Earth, Sand, Lime, Moorum, Aggregate, Stone
Unit = cum
Placing tipper at unloading point excluding time for haulage and
Time required for
i Positioning of tipper at loading point Min 1.000
ii Manoeuvering, reversing, dumping and turning for return Min 2.000
iii Waiting time, unforeseen contingencies, etc. Min 2.000
Total Min 5.000
a) Machinery
Tipper 10 t capacity hour 0.080 1518.00 121.44
b) Overheads & Contractor’s profit@ 12.5 % on (a) 15.18
Cost for 5.5 cum = a+b 136.62
Rate per cum = (a+b)/5.5 24.84
Total loading and unloading by mechanical means 118.02
7 (ii) Unloading of RCC Hume pipe by mechanical means including a
A. 1000/1200 mm dia RCC Hume pipes
Unit = per pipe
Taking output = 9 pipes
a) Labour
Mate day 0.02 325.00 6.50
b) Machinery
Truck hour 0.20 934.30 186.86
Crane hour 0.20 2930.00 586.00
c) Overheads & Contractor’s profit@ 12.5 % on (a+b) 116.55
Cost for 9 pipes = a+b+c 1,048.91
Rate per pipe = (a+b+c)/9 116.55
Total Cost per p 116.55
Total Loding & Unloading of RCC Hume Pipe per Pipe = 179.34 + 116.55 = 295.89
Total Loding & Unloading of RCC Hume Pipe m = 295.89 / 2.50 = 118.36
8 1.3 Loading, Unloading and Stacking of Bricks by Manual Means
(i) Loading of Bricks by manual means including a lead upto 30 m
Unit = 1000 Nos.
Taking output = 2000 Nos.
a) Labour
Mate day 0.01 325.00 3.25
b) Machinery
Cost for 2000 Nos. = a+b+c 436.58
Rate for 1000 bricks = (a+b+c)/2 218.29
SAY no. 218.29
9 (ii) Unloading and Stacking of Bricks by manual means including a lead
upto 30 m
Unit = 1000 Nos.
Taking output = 2000 Nos.
a) Labour
Mate day 0.01 325.00 3.25
b) Machinery
86
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
c) Haulage
Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% BY TIPPER
on (a+b) 48.51
Cost for 2000 Nos. = a+b+c 436.58
Rate for 1000 bricks = (a+b+c)/2 218.29
SAY no. 218.29
10 Loading and Unloading of Cement or steel by Manual Means and stacking
(i) Loading of Cement by manual means including a lead upto 30 m
Unit = t
Taking output = 10 t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.06 325.00 19.50
b) Machinery
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,589.40
Rate per tonnes = (a+b+c)/10 158.94
SAY t 158.94
11 (ii) Unloading of Cement by manual means including a lead upto 30 m
Unit = t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.06 325.00 19.50
b) Machinery
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,589.40
Rate per tonne = (a+b+c)/10 158.94
SAY t 158.94
12 1.5 Loading and Unloading of Structural Steel and Steel Bars by manual
means
(i) Loading of Structural Steel, Steel Bars by manual means including a lead
upto 30 m
Unit = t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.07 325.00 22.75
b) Machinery
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,696.33
SAY t 169.63
13 (ii) Unloading of Structural Steel, Steel Bars by manual means including
a lead upto 30 m
Unit = t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.07 325.00 22.75
b) Machinery
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,696.33
Rate per t = (a+b+c)/10 169.63
SAY t 169.63
14 1.6 Loading and Unloading of Bitumen Drums by Manual Means
(i) Loading of Bitumen Drums by manual means including a lead upto 30 m
Unit = t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.06 325.00 19.50
b) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity hour 1.25 934.30 1,167.88
87
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
c) Haulage
Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% BY TIPPER
on (a+b) 209.62
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,886.60
SAY t 188.66
15 (ii) Unloading of Bitumen Drums by Manual Means including a lead upto
30 m
Unit = t
a) Labour
Mate day 0.05 325.00 16.25
b) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity hour 1.25 934.30 1,167.88
Cost for 10 t = a+b+c 1,745.24
Rate per t = (a+b+c)/10 174.52
Note :- The rate is inclusive of the self weight of drum
SAY t 174.52
16 1.10 Haulage excluding Loading & Unloading
Haulage of materials by tipper excluding cost of Loading, Unloading and
stacking
Unit = 1km
Taking output 10t load and lead 10km = 100t_km
Case - I Surfaced Road
Speed with load : 25km per hour
Speed while returning empty : 35km per hour
a) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity Truck 10
Cost for 100t_km = a+b+c 725.25
Cost for 1 t_km = a+b+c/100 7.25
SAY 7.25
Case - II Unsurfaced Road
a) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity
b) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b) 96.93
Cost for 100t_km = a+b+c 872.40
Cost for 1 t_km = a+b+c/100 8.72
SAY 8.72
Case - III Kutcha Track and Track in River Bed / Nallah Bed and Choe
Bed
a) Machinery
Truck 10 t capacity
Haulage with load hour 1 934.30 934.30
b) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b) 195.04
Cost for 100t_km = a+b+c 1,755.32
Cost for 1 t_km = a+b+c/100 17.55
SAY 17.55
17 2.2 201 Clearing and Grubbing Road Land
(I) Clearing and Grubbing Road Land including uprooting wild vegetation , grass,bushes,shurbs,saplings and trees of
girth upto 300mm, removal of stumps of such trees cut earlier and unseviceable materials & stacking of serviceable
materials to be used or auctioned upto a lead of 1000m including removal and disposal of top organic soil not
exceeding
By Manual150mm
Means in thickness as per technical specification(clause201.1)
(A) In area of non-thorny jungle
a) Labour
Mate day 6.00 325.00 1,950.00
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 150.00 306.00 45,900.00
b) Machinery
Tractor with trolley hour 1.00 629.00 629.00
c) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b) 6,059.88
Rate per hectare = a+b+c 54,538.88
SAY Ha. 54,538.88
18 2.5 202 Dismantling of Structures
88
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Haulage
Dismantling of existing structures like culverts, BY TIPPER
bridges, retaining walls and other structure comprising of masonry,
cement concrete, wood work, steel work, including T&P and scaffolding wherever necessary, sorting the dismantled
material, disposal of unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lifts and lead of 1000 m as
per Technical Specification Clause 202.
Unit = cum
(I) By Manual Means
(C) Reinforced Cement Concrete
a) Labour
Mate day 0.15 325.00 48.75
BlackSmith day 0.25 413.00 103.25
Machinery
b) Tractor with trolley hour 0.27 591.40 159.68
Cost for 1.25 cum = a+b+c+d 1,555.51
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/1.25 1,244.41
SAY cum 1,244.41
19 2.6 202 Dismantling of existing structures, like culverts, bridge,retaining wall and other structures comprising of brick
masonary including unserviceable material and stacking the serviceable material with all lift and lead of 1000m as
per technical specification clause 202.
(D) Dry Brick Pitching or Brick Soling, Masonry work
a) Labour
Mate day 0.014 325.00 4.55
b) Machinery
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/1.25= cum 244.20
20 2.13 202.1 Removing all types of Hume pipe and stacking
Removing all types of Hume pipes and stacking within a lead of 1000 m
including Earthwork and Dismantling of Masonry Works as per Technical
(A) Upto 600 mm dia Hume pipe
a) Labour
Mate day 0.02 325.00 6.50
Rate per m = a+b m 186.32
(B) Above 600 mm to 900 mm dia Hume pipe
a) Labour
Mate day 0.03 325.00 9.75
Rate per m = a+b 251.94
SAY m 251.94
EARTHWORK
21 3.4 301.5 Construction of Embankment with Material Obtained from Borrow Pits
(A) Construction of embankment with approved material obtained from borrow pits with a lift upto 1.5 m,
transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacting to meet requirement of Tables
300.1 and 300.2 with a lead upto 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 301.5
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
b) Machinery
Hydraulic Excavator 0.9 cum bucket capacity @ 60 cum per hour hour 1.67 2202.00 3,677.34
Truck 10 t capacity hour 4.50 1,518.00 6,831.00
Add 10 % of the cost of carriage by tipper 683.10
Dozer D-50 for spreading @ 100 cum per hour hour 0.50 1,587.00 793.50
Tractar mounted grader arrangement for grading @ 100 cum per hour 1.00 573.20
573.20
hour
Water tanker 6 kl capacity hour 2.00 707.00 1,414.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN Static Roller @ 80 cum per hour hour 1.25 1,518.00 1,897.50
c) Material
Water kl 12.00 40.00 480.00
Royality & Compensation for earth taken from private land cum 60.00 34.82 2,089.20
d) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 2,344.73
Rate for 100 cum = a+b+c+d 21,102.57

Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d)/100 211.03 89
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Haulage BY TIPPER SAY cum 211.03

22 3.14 303.1 Construction of Subgrade and Earthen Shoulders
Construction of subgrade and earthen shoulders with approved material obtained from borrow pits
with all lifts and leads, transporting to site, spreading, grading to required slope and compacted to meet
requirement of Table 300.2 with lead upto 1000 m as per Technical Specification Clause 303.1.
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
b) Machinery
Hydraulic excavator 0.9 cum bucket capacity @ 60 cum per hour hour 1.67 2202.00 3,677.34
Truck 10 t capacity, 4 trips per hour hour 4.50 1518.00 6,831.00
Add 10 % of the cost of carriage to cover loading & unloading cum 683.10
Dozer D-50 for spreading @ 100 cum per hour hour 0.50 1587.00 793.50
Tractar mounted grader arrangement for grading @ 100 cum per hour 1.00 591.40 591.40
hour
Water tanker with 6 kl capacity hour 2.00 707.00 1,414.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN Static Roller @80 cum per hour hour 1.43 1,518.00 2,170.74
c) Material
Water kl 12.00 40.00 480.00
Royality & Compensation for earth taken from private land cum 60.00 34.82 2,089.20

Rate for 100 cum = a+b+c+d 21,430.44
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d)/100 214.30
Total Cost including cum 214.30
PAVEMENT CRUST LAYERS
(A) ( By mix in place method )
Construction of granular sub-base by providing well graded material, spreading in uniform layers with
tractor mounted grader arrangement on prepared surface, mixing by mix in place method with
rotavator at OMC, and compacting with smooth wheel roller to achieve the desired density, complete
as per Technical Specification Clause 401.
(ii) For Grading II Material
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.48 325.00 156.00
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 2.00 388.00 776.00
b) Machinery
Tractor mounted grader arrengement hour 6.00 2982.00 17,892.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller @ 10 cum per hour hour 30.00 1518.00 45,540.00
Tractor with Rotavator 25 cum per hour hour 12.00 573.20 6,878.40
c) Material
Well graded granular sub-base material as per Table 400.1
26.5 mm to 9.5 mm @ 35 per cent cum 134.00 647.19 86,723.46
9.5 mm to 2.36 mm @ 25 per cent cum 96.00 506.92 48,664.32
2.36 mm below @ 40 per cent cum 153.00 141.85 21,703.05
Water kl 30.00 40.00 1,200.00
e) Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c+d) 0.00
Cost of GSB without carriage 2,65,644.26

A) Cost of GSB without carriage per cum cum 885.48
e) CARRIAGE
Carriage for GSB material 26.5 mm to 9.5 Cum 0.7666667 3173.72 2,433.19
Carriage for material below 2.36 mm (Local Sand) Cum 0.51 155.36 79.23
Carriage cost 2,512.42
Rate per cum with carriage 3,397.90
SAY CUM 3,397.90
(2-A) Providing, laying, spreading and compacting stone aggregates of specific sizes to water bound macadam
specification including spreading in uniform thickness, hand packing, rolling with smooth wheel roller 80-100 kN
in stages to proper grade and camber, applying and brooming, stone screening/binding materials to fill-up the
interstices of coarse aggregate, watering and compacting to the required density grading 2 as per Technical
(B) By Mechanical Means
Unit = cum 90
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Taking output = 360 cum Haulage BY TIPPER

a) Labour
Mate day 0.68 325.00 221.00
b) Machinery
Tractar mounted grader arrangement 110 HP @ 50 cum per hour hour 14.40 591.40 8,516.16
for spreading
c) Material (Refer Tables 400.7, 8, 9 and 10)
Aggregate
Grading 2 63 mm to 45 mm @ 0.91 cum per 10 sqm for cum 435.60 473.70 2,06,343.72
compacted thickness of 75 mm
Stone Screening
Type B 11.2 mm for Grading 2 @ 0.20 cum per 10 sqm cum 96.01 392.53 37,686.81
Water kl 144.00 40.00 5,760.00
d) Over Heads and CP @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 39,624.59
f) CARRIAGE
Grading-II Cum 435.60 3412.96 14,86,685.38
Stone Screening Cum 96.01 3173.72 3,04,708.86
Cost for 360 cum = a+b+c+d+e+f 21,48,015.50

Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e+f)/360 5,966.71
SAY cum 5,966.71
(3-A) Providing, laying, spreading and compacting stone aggregates of specific sizes to water bound macadam
specification including spreading in uniform thickness, hand packing, rolling with smooth wheel roller
80-100 kN in stages to proper grade and camber, applying and brooming, stone screening to fill-up the
interstices of coarse aggregate, watering and compacting to the required density Grading 3 as per
(B) By Mechanical Means
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.68 325.00 221.00
b) Machinery
Tractor mounted grader arrangement 110 HP @ 50 cum per hour hour 14.40 573.20 8,254.08
for spreading
c) Material (Refer Tables 400.7, 8, 9 and 10)
Aggregate
Grading 3 53 mm to 22.4 mm @ 0.91 cum per 10 sqm for cum 435.60 503.85 2,19,477.06
compacted thickness of 75 mm
Stone Screening
Type B 11.2 mm for Grading 3 @ 0.18 cum per 10 sqm cum 86.40 392.53 33,914.59
Water kl 144.00 40.00 5,760.00
d) Over Heads @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 40,761.97
Cost for 360 cum = a+b+c+d 366857.6985
e) Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d)/360 1019.05
f) CARRIAGE
Stone material Grading 3 53 mm to 22.4 mm Cum 1.21 3412.96 4,129.68
Stone Screening Cum 0.24 3173.72 761.69
Cost for 360 cum = a+b+c+d+e+f 5,910.42
SAY cum 5,910.42
BITUMINOUS ITEMS
25 5.1 502 Prime Coat ( Low Porosity )
(I) Providing and applying primer coat with bitumen emulsion (SS-1) on prepared surface of granular
base including cleaning of road surface and spraying primer at the rate of 0.70-1.0 kg/sqm using
mechanical means as per Technical Specification Clause 502
a) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
b) Machinery
Hydraulic broom @ 1250 sqm per hour hour 1.40 746.00 1,044.40
Air compressor 210 cfm hour 1.40 391.00 547.40
Bitumen emulsion pressure distributor @ 1750 sqm per hour hour 1.00 283.00 283.00
91
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Haulage BY TIPPER
Water tanker 6 kl capacity 1 trip per hour hour 0.50 707.00 353.50
c) Material
Bitumen emulsion (SS-1) @ 0.85 kg per sqm t 1.48 53,791.82 79,611.89
Water kl 3.00 40.00 120.00
e) CARRIAGE
Bitumen ton 1.48 776.57 1,149.32
Cost of 1750 sqm = a+b+c+d+e 93,713.42
Rate per sqm = (a+b+c+d+e)/1750 53.55
SAY sqm 53.55
26 5.2 503 Tack Coat
(I) Providing and applying tack coat with Bitumen emulsion (RS-1) using emulsion distributor at the rate
of 0.20 to 0.25 kg per sqm on the prepared bituminous surface cleaned with Hydraulic broom as per
Technical Specification Clause 503.
Unit = sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
b) Machinery
Hydraulic broom @ 1250 sqm per hour hour 1.40 746.00 1,044.40
Air compressor 210 cfm hour 1.40 391.00 547.40
Emulsion pressure distributor @1750 sqm per hour hour 1.00 283.00 283.00
c) Material
Bitumen emulsion (RS-1) @ 0.225 kg per sqm t 0.48 54,823.82 26,315.43
e) CARRIAGE
Bitumen ton 0.48 776.57 372.75
Cost of 1750 sqm = a+b+c+d+e 32,445.64
SAY sqm 18.54
27 5.3 504 Bituminous Macadam
Providing and laying bituminous macadam with 100-120 TPH hot mix plant producing an average output of 75 tonnes
per hour using crushed aggregates of specified grading premixed with bituminous binder, transported to site, laid over
RCD
apreviously prepared surface with paver finisher to the required grade, level and alignment and rolled as per clauses
501.6 and 501.7 to achieve the desired compaction.
Unit = cum
Taking output = 205 cum (450 tonnes)
a) Labour
Mate day 0.84 325 273.00
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 16 306 4,896.00
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 5 388 1,940.00
b) Machinery
Batch mix HMP 100-120 TPH @ 75 t per hour actual output hour 6 40270 2,41,620.00
Hydraulic broom @ 1250 sqm per hour hour 2.2 746 1,641.20
Air compressor 210 cfm hour 2.2 391 860.20
Paver finisher hour 6 2078 12,468.00
Generator 250 KVA hour 6 3034 18,204.00
Front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity hour 6 1594 9,564.00
Tipper 10 tonne capacity tonne.km 450 x L 9.07 4,081.50
Add 10 per cent of cost of carriage to cover cost of loading
408.15
and unloading
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller for intial break down
5,920.20
rolling, final and finishing rolling hour 6.00x0.65* 1518
Vibratory roller 80-100 kN for intermediate rolling tonne.km 6.00x0.65* 1978 7,714.20
Finish rolling with 6-8 tonnes smooth wheeled tandem
5,920.20
roller hour 6.00x0.65* 1518
c) Material
i) Bitumen @ 3.3 per cent of mix (Weight of mix = 205.0 x
2.2 = 450 t) t 14.85 54206.82 8,04,971.28
ii) Aggregate
Total weight of mix = 225 t
Weight of bitumen = 7.425 t
Weight of aggregate = 225 – 7.425 = 217.575 t
Taking density of aggregate = 1.5 t/cum
Volume of aggregate = 145.05 cum
(19 mm nominal size)
92
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
25 -10 mm - 40 per cent Haulage BY TIPPER 116.04 656.34 76,161.69

10– 5 mm - 40 per cent Cum 116.04 573.71 66,573.31
5 mm and below - 20 per cent Cum 58.02 249.22 14,459.74
d) Overheads & Contractor’s profit@ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 1,59,709.58
Cost for 205 cum = a+b+c+d+e 14,37,386.26
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e)/205 (For Grading-II) 7,011.64
Carriage Cost
Bitumen (S-65) ton 0.072439 776.57 56.25
Stone chips cum 1.415122 3481.39 4,926.59
Rate per Cum with carriage 11,994.49
Tatal Cost 11,994.49
27 5.9 508 Mix Seal Surfacing Type B
(II ) Providing, laying and rolling of close-graded premix surfacing material of 20 mm thickness composed of 11.2 mm to 0.9 mm (Type-A)
or 13.2 mm to 0.9 mm (Type-B) aggregates using penetration grade bitumen to required line, grade and level to serve as wearing
course on a previously prepared base, including mixing in a suitable plant, laying and rolling with a three wheel 8-10 kN static roller
and finishing to required level and grades as per Technical Specification Clause 509 Type B
Case - II By Mechanical Means
(I) Bitumen (VG -30)
Unit = sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.52 325.00 169.00
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 3.00 388.00 1,164.00
b) Machinery
HMP 30/40 t per hour hour 6.00 18,776.00 1,12,656.00
Electric generator set 125 KVA hour 6.00 1,359.00 8,154.00
Front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity hour 6.00 1,594.00 9,564.00
Tipper 5.5 10 t capacity hour 3.60 1,518.00 5,464.80
Paver finisher hour 6.00 2,078.00 12,468.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller hour 18.00 1,518.00 27,324.00
c) Material
Bitumen (S-90) @ 19 kg per 10 sqm t 7.60 53,406.82 4,05,891.83
Stone crushed aggregates 13.2 mm to 0.09 mm @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm cum 108.00 523.37 56,523.96
e) Contractor’s profit @ 10% on (a+b+c+d) 0.00
Cost of 4000 sqm = a+b+c+d 7,22,744.54
Rate per sqm = (a+b+c+d)/4000 180.69
Carriage Cost
Bitumen (S-90) ton 0.00190 776.57 1.48
Stone chips cum 0.02700 3481.39 94.00
Rate per sqm with carriage 276.16
Total Cost including sqm 276.16
(II) Providing, laying and rolling of open-graded premix carpet of 20 mm thickness composed of 13.2 mm to 5.6 mm
aggregates either using penetration grade bitumen or emulsion to required line, grade and level to serve as wearing
course on a previously prepared base, including mixing in a suitable plant, laying and rolling with a three wheel 80-
100 kN static roller capacity, finished to required level and grades to be followed by seal coat of either Type A or
Type B or Type C as per Technical Specification Clause 508.
Case - II By Mechanical Means
(I) Bitumen (S-90)
Unit = sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.52 325.00 169.00
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 10 306.00 3,060.00
Mazdoor (Skilled) day 3 388.00 1,164.00
b) Machinery
HMP 30/40 t per hour hour 6 18,776.00 1,12,656.00
Electric generator set 125 KVA hour 6 1,359.00 8,154.00
Front end loader 1 cum bucket capacity hour 6 1,594.00 9,564.00
Tipper 5.5 10 t capacity hour 3.64 1,518.00 5,525.52
Paver finisher hour 6 2,078.00 12,468.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller hour 16 1,518.00 24,288.00
c) Material
Bitumen (S-90) @ 14.60 kg per 10 sqm t 5.378 53,406.82 2,87,221.88
Waste Plastic @ 8% of the quantity of Bitumen t 0.462 15,000.00 6,930.00
Crushed stone chipping, 13.2 mm to 5.6 mm @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm cum 108 515.53 55,677.24
Cost of 4000 sqm = a+b+c+d 5,92,737.34
Rate per sqm = (a+b+c+d)/4000 148.18
e) CARRIAGE
93
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Bitumen Haulage BY TIPPER ton 0.001345 776.57 1.04

Stone chips cum 0.027 3481.39 94.00
Rate per sqm with carriage 243.23
Total Cost sqm 243.23
28 5.12 510 Seal Coat
Providing and laying seal coat sealing the voids in a bituminous surface laid to the specified levels, grade and cross
fall using Type B, as per Technical Specification Clause 510
A. By Manual Means
Case - I : Type A
(I) Bitumen (S-90)
Unit = sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.85 325.00 276.25
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 15 306.00 4,590.00
Mazdoor (Semi-Skilled) day 2 318.00 636.00
b) Machinery
Mixal 6/10 t capacity hour 2.5 3702.00 9,255.00
Bitumen boiler oil fired, capacity 1000 litre fitted with spray set hour 2.5 510.00 1,275.00
Three wheel 80-100 kN static roller hour 2.5 803.00 2,007.50
c) Material
Bitumen (S-90) @ 9.80 kg per 10 sqm t 0.85 53406.82 45,395.80
cum
Crushed stone chipping of 6.7 mm size 100 per cent passing 11.2 mm retained on234.89
sieve and 7.5 1,761.68
2.36 mm sieve applied @ 0.09 cu
d) Over Heads @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 8,149.65
Cost of 1250 sqm = a+b+c+d 73,346.87
Rate per sqm = (a+b+c+d)/1250 58.68
f) CARRIAGE
i) Bitumen t 0.00068 776.57 0.53
ii) Crushed stone chipping cum 0.006 3481.39 20.89
Total Cost ) cum 80.09
SUB HEAD : ANALYSIS OF BRIDGES ITEMS
29 11.1 300 Excavation for Structures
Earthwork in excavation for structures as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 305.1
including setting out, construction of shoring and bracing, removal of stumps and other deleterious
material and disposal upto a lead of 50 m, dressing of sides and bottom and backfilling in trenches
I. Ordinary soil
(i) Upto 3 m depth
Unit = cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.32 325.00 104.00
b) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a) 510.40
Cost for 10 cum = a+b+c 3,062.40
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/10 cum 306.24
(ii) Upto 3 m to 6m depth
a) Labour
Mate day 0.38 325.00 123.50
b) Over Heads & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a) 606.10
Cost for 10 cum = a+b+c 3,636.60
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/10 cum 363.66
800 & Providing concrete for plain/reinforced concrete in open foundations complete as per drawings and
30 11.4 1200 technical specifications Clause 802, 803, 1202 & 1203
II. P.C.C grade M 15
(i) Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 0.275 5,006.40 1,376.76
Coarse sand cum 0.48 175.80 84.38
40 mm aggregate cum 0.48 486.92 233.72
20 mm aggregate cum 0.24 595.36 142.89
10 mm aggregate cum 0.08 657.91 52.63
b) Labour
Mate day 0.08 325.00 26.00
Mason (1st Class) day 0.10 413.00 41.30
Bhisti day 0.27 306.00 82.62
c) Machinery 94
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity Haulage BY TIPPER hour 0.40 1,289.30 515.72
d) Formwork @ 4% on cost of material, labour and machinery (a+b+c) 122.19
e) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c+d) 635.40
f) CARRIAGE
Cement t 0.275 390.41 107.36
Coarse sand cum 0.48 3,092.18 1,484.25
Aggregate cum 0.80 3,481.39 2,785.11
Rate per cum = a+b+c+d+e+f cum 8,189.12
1500, R.C.C. grade M 30 in Open Foundation complete as per Dwg & Tech
12.8
33 1700 & Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
(G)
2100
Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
Case II Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 48.80 5,006.40 2,44,312.32
Coarse sand cum 54.00 175.80 9,493.20
20 mm aggregate cum 64.80 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm aggregate cum 43.20 657.91 28,421.71
b) Labour
Mate day 0.84 325.00 273.00
Mason (1st Class) day 3.00 413.00 1,239.00
c) Machinery
Batching Plant @20 cum/hour hour 6.00 2,981.00 17,886.00
Generator 100 KVA hour 6.00 869.00 5,214.00
Loader 1 cum capacity hour 6.00 1,594.00 9,564.00
Transit Mixer 4 cum capacity for lead up to 1.0 km hour 15.00 1,406.00 21,090.00
Concrete Pump hour 6.00 960.00 5,760.00
d) Formwork @ 3.5% on (a+b+c) 13,556.92
e) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c+d) 80,179.50
g) CARRIAGE
Cement t 48.80 390.41 19,052.01
Coarse sand cum 54.00 3,092.18 1,66,977.72
Aggregate cum 108.00 3,481.39 3,75,990.12
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e+f+g)/120 cum 8,692.47
Bored cast-in-situ M35 grade R.C.C. Pile excluding Reinforcement

1100 & complete as per Drawing and Technical Specifications and removal of
34 12.25
1700 excavated earth with all lifts and lead upto 1000 m.
Pile Diameter- 1200mm (Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and

Case II
Concrete Pump)
Unit = meter
Taking ouput = 9m
a) Material
PCC M-35 (With Batching Plant, Item 12.11 (c) cum 10.17 8,197.09 83,364.38
b) Labour
Mate day 0.18 325.00 58.50
c) Machinery
Hire and running charges of hydraulic piling rig with power unit and hour 6.00 17,135.00 1,02,810.00
Hire and running charges of light crane for lowering reinforcement cage hour 0.50 2,930.00 1,465.00
Hire and running charges of Bentonite pump (Rate including in pilling hour 6.00 0.00
Loader I cum bucket capacity. hour 0.50 1,594.00 797.00
Tipper 5.5 t capacity for disposal of muck from pile bore hole hour 0.50 876.00 438.00
Bentonite kg 385.00 3.25 1,251.25
d) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c+d) 38,312.23
f) CARRIAGE
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e+f)/9 m 25,541.48
35 '12.11 (iv) Sub-Analysis
C PCC grade M-35 (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
Case II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
Unit = 1 cum
(a) Material
Cement tonne 50.28 5,006.40 2,51,721.79
Coarse sand cum 54.00 175.80 9,493.20
40 mm Aggregate cum 0.00 0.00 0.00
20 mm Aggregate cum 64.80 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm Aggregate cum 43.20 657.91 28,421.71
Admixture Kg 172.80 152.14 26,289.79
(b) Labour
Mate day 0.88 325.00 286.00
95
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
(C)
Machinery Haulage BY TIPPER
d) CARRIAGE
Cement t 50.28 390.41 19,629.81
Coarse sand cum 54.00 3,092.18 1,66,977.72
Aggregate cum 108.00 3,481.39 3,75,990.12
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/120 cum 8,197.09
1200, Sub-Analysis
12.11
34 1500 & PCC grade M-30 (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
(C)
1700
Case-I Using Concrete Mixer
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 6.08 5,006.40 30,438.91
Coarse sand cum 6.75 175.80 1,186.65
40 mm aggregate cum 5.40 486.92 2,629.37
20 mm aggregate cum 5.40 595.36 3,214.94
10 mm aggregate cum 2.70 657.91 1,776.36
Admixture kg 21.60 100.00 2,160.00
b) Labour
Mate day 0.90 325.00 292.50
c) Machinery
Concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity hour 6.00 1,289.30 7,735.80
Light Crane of 3 tonnes capacity for handling tremie pipe hour 6.00 2,930.00 17,580.00
35 11.7 1000 & Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in foundation
1200 complete as per drawings and technical specifications Clauses 1000 and
1202
Unit = t
a) Material
HYSD bars including 5 per cent for overlaps and wastage t 1.05 54,809.75 57,550.24
Binding wire kg 6.00 58.95 353.70
b) Labour for cutting, bending, shifting to site, tying and placing in
Mate day 0.40 325.00 130.00
Blacksmith day 2.00 413.00 826.00
c) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 12,139.19
d) Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c) 0.00
e) CARRIAGE
Reinforcement t 1.05 411.80 432.39
Rate per t = a+b+c+d+e t 73,267.52
36 12.22 1200 Providing steel liner 10 mm thick for curbs and 6mm thick for steining of wells including fabricating and setting out as per detailed
&1900 drawing
Unit = 1 MT
Taking Output = 1 MT
a) Material
i) Structural Steel including 5% Westage ton 1.05 46658.00 48,990.90
b) Labour
Mate Day 1.24 325.00 403.00
Fitter Day 6.00 420.00 2,520.00
Blacksmith Day 5.00 413.00 2,065.00
Welder Day 5.00 463.00 2,315.00
Mazdoor Day 10.00 306.00 3,060.00
Electrodes,Cutting Gas and Other Consumables @ 5 percent on cost a (a) 2,449.55
Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 12,360.69
Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c) 0.00
Rate per MT (a+b+c+d) 74,164.13
e) CARRIAGE
Structural Steel ton 1.1 614.87 645.61
Total Cost including 74,809.75
SUBSTRUCTURE
1500, R.C.C. grade M-30 in Substructure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H
13.5 1700 & Data Book)
31 (G) 2100
(p) Height Upto 5m
Case-II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump 96
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Unit = cum Haulage BY TIPPER

a) Material
Cement t 48.8 5006.4 2,44,312.32
Coarse sand cum 54 175.8 9,493.20
20 mm aggregate cum 64.8 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm aggregate cum 43.2 657.91 28,421.71
b) Labour
Mate day 0.84 325 273.00
Mason (1st Class) day 3 413 1,239.00
c) Machinery
Batching Plant @20 cum/hour hour 6 2981 17,886.00
Loader 1 cum capacity hour 6 1594 9,564.00
Transit Mixer 4 cum capacity for lead up to 1.0 km hour 15 1406 21,090.00
Concrete Pump hour 6 960 5,760.00
d) Formwork @ 10% on (a+b+c) 38,734.06
e) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 85,214.92
g) CARRIAGE
Cement t 48.8 390.41 19,052.01
Coarse sand cum 54 3092.18 1,66,977.72
Aggregate cum 108 3481.39 3,75,990.12
1500, R.C.C. grade M-30 in Substructure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H
13.5 1700 & Data Book)
32 (G) 2100
(q) Height 5m to 10m
Case-II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 48.8 5006.4 2,44,312.32
Coarse sand cum 54 175.8 9,493.20
20 mm aggregate cum 64.8 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm aggregate cum 43.2 657.91 28,421.71
b) Labour
Mate day 0.84 325 273.00
c) Machinery
d) Formwork @ 11.5 % on (a+b+c) 44,544.16
e) Add for Extra lift @ 1.6% on (a+b+c) 1,519.29
f) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 86,376.94
g) Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c) 0.00
h) CARRIAGE
Cement t 48.8 390.41 19,052.01
Coarse sand cum 54 3092.18 1,66,977.72
Aggregate cum 108 3481.39 3,75,990.12
1500, R.C.C. grade M-35 in Substructure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using MoRT&H Data
13.5 1700 & Book)
33 (H) 2100
(q) Height 5m to 10m

Case-II Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 50.64 5,006.40 2,53,524.10
Coarse sand cum 54.00 175.80 9,493.20
20 mm aggregate cum 64.80 595.36 38,579.33
97
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
10 mm aggregate Haulage BY TIPPER cum 43.20 657.91 28,421.71

b) Labour
Mate day 0.84 325.00 273.00
c) Machinery
d) Formwork @ 11.0% on (a+b+c) 39,615.22
e) Add for Extra lift @ 1.4% on (a+b+c) 5,041.94
f) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 88,241.90
g) Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c) 0.00
h) CARRIAGE
Cement t 50.64 390.41 19,770.36
Coarse sand cum 54.00 3,092.18 1,66,977.72
Aggregate cum 108.00 3,481.39 3,75,990.12
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e+f+g+h)/120 cum 9,101.58
Supplying, fitting and placing HYSD bar reinforcement (Fe 415) in substructrue complete as per
33 12.6 1000 drawings and technical specification Clauses 1002, 1005, 1010 & 1202
Unit = t
a) Material
HYSD bars including 5 per cent overlaps and wastage t 1.05 54,809.75 57,550.24
Binding wire kg 6.00 58.95 353.70
b) Labour for cutting, bending, shifting to site, tying, and placing in
position
Mate day 0.34 325.00 110.50
Blacksmith day 2.00 413.00 826.00
e) CARRIAGE
34 13.16 2000 & Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level POT-PTFE bearing consisting of a metal piston
2200 supported by a disc or unreinforced elastomer confined within a metal cylinder, sealing rings, dust seals, PTFE
surface sliding against stainless steel mating surface, completre assembly to be of cast steel/fabricated structural
steel, metal and elastomer elements to be as per IRC: 83 part-I & II respectively and other parts conforming to BS:
5400, section 9.1 & 9.2 and clause 2006 of MoRTH Specifications complete asper drawing and approved technical
specifications.
unit: one tonne capacity
Considering a Pot bearing assembly of 250 tonne capacity for this
analysis.
a) Labour
Mate day 0.08 325.00 26.00
Mazdoor day 1.50 306.00 459.00
b) Material
Pot type bearing assembly consisting of a metal piston supported by a
disc, PTFE pads providing sliding surfaces against stainless steel mating
together with cast steel assemblies/fabricated structural steel assemblies MT 250.00 136.66 34,165.00
duly painted with all components as per clause 2006 and complete as per
drawings and Technical Specification
Add 1 per cent of cost of bearing assembly for foundation anchorage bolts
341.65
and and consumables.
Cost for 250 tonnes capacity bearing = a+b+c+d 42,222.78
Rate per t = a+b+c+d t 42,222.78

35 13.14 2000 & Supplying, fitting and fixing in position true to line and level elastomeric bearing conforming to IRC: 83 (Part-II)
2200 section IX and clause 2005 of MoRTH specifications complete including all accessories as per drawing and Technical
Specifications.
Unit: one cubic centimetre

Considering an elastomeric bearing of size 500 x 400 x 96 mm for this
analysis.
overal volume - 19200 cu.cm
Volume of 6 nos. 488 x 388 x 4 mm size reinforcing steel plates = 4545
cu.cm.
Hence volume of elastometer = 14655 cu.cm.
98
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
a) Labour Haulage BY TIPPER

Mate day 0.06 325.00 19.50
Mazdoor day 1.00 306.00 306.00
b) Material
Elastomeric bearing assembly consisting of 7 layers of elastomer bonded
to 6 nos. internal reinforcing steel laminates by the process of
cum 19,200.00 0.59 11,328.00
vulcanisation, complete with all components as per drawing and
Technical Specifications.
Add 1 per cent of cost of bearing assembly for foundation anchorage bolts
113.28
and and consumables.
Cost for 250 tonnes capacity bearing = a+b+c+d 14,352.94
Rate pet tonne capacity = (a+b+c+d)/19200 0.75
Rate per t = a+b+c+d t 0.75
Providing weepholes in brick masonry/stone masonry, plain/reinforced concrete abutment, wing wall,
return wall with 100 mm dia AC pipe extending through the full width of the structures with slope of
1(V):20(H) towards drawing face complete as per drawing and technical specification Clauses 614, 709,
34 12.9 600 1204.3.7
Unit = Nos
Taking output = 30 Nos
a) Material
AC pipe 100 mm dia including wastage @ 5 per cent. Average lengthmof weep hole 31.5 is taken as one
42.54
metre for1,340.01
the purpose of es
MS clamps Nos. 30.00 34.06 1,021.80
Cement mortar 1:3 (For rate refer to item 11.5 I) cum 0.05 6,496.63 324.83
b) Labour
Mate day 0.03 325.00 9.75
Mason 1st Class day 0.50 413.00 206.50
c) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 595.88
e) CARRIAGE
Cost for 30 Nos = (a+b+c+d+e) 3,575.27
Rate per No = (a+b+c+d+e)/30= no. 119.18
Sub-analysis
Cement mortar 1:3 (1 cement : 3 sand)
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 0.51 5,006.40 2,553.26
Sand cum 1.05 175.80 184.59
b) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
Bhisti day 0.08 306.00 24.48
Carriage
Cement t 0.51 390.41 199.11
Course Sand cum 1.05 3,092.18 3,246.79
Total material and labour = (a+b) cum 6,496.63
Backfilling behind abutment, wing wall and return wall complete as per drawings & technical
35 12.10 1200 specification Clause 1204.3.8
Unit = cum
I) Granular material
a) Material
Granular material cum 12.00 163.53 1,962.36
b) Labour
Mate day 0.28 325.00 91.00
Bhisti day 0.40 306.00 122.40
e) CARRIAGE
Granular Material cum 12.00 3,481.39 41,776.68
Cost for 10 cum of granular backfill = a+b+c+d+e 48,059.59
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e)/10 4,805.96
II) Sandy material
Unit = cum
a) Material
Sand cum 12.00 141.85 1,702.20
b) Labour
Mate day 0.40 325.00 130.00
Bhisti day 0.40 306.00 122.40
99
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
e) CARRIAGE Haulage BY TIPPER

Sand cum 12 155.36 1,864.32
Cost for 10 cum of sandy backfill = a+b+c+d+e
7,881.84
Rate per cum including = (a+b+c+d+e)/10 cum 788.18
36 12.11 1200
Providing and laying filter media with granular crushed aggregates as per specification to a
thickness of not less than 600 mm with smaller size towards the soil and bigger size towards the
wall and providing over the entire surface behind abutment, wing wall, return wall to the full height,
compacted to firm condition complete as per drawing and technical specification Clause 1204.3.8
Unit = cum
a) Material
Filter media as per specification cum 12.00 504.46 6,053.52
b) Labour
Mate day 0.40 325.00 130.00
Bhisti day 0.50 306.00 153.00
c) Over Heads @ 20% on (a+b) 1,895.70
e) CARRIAGE
Filter Material cum 12 3173.72 38,084.64
Cost for 10 cum of filter media = a+b+c+d+e 49,458.86
Rate per cum including = (a+b+c+d+e)/10 cum 4,945.89
SUPER STRUCTURE
37 14.1 1500,
(C) 1600 & R.C.C. grade M 30 in Super Structure complete as per Dwg & Tech Specification (Analysis using
1700 MoRT&H Data Book)
Using Batching Plant, Transit Mixer and Concrete Pump
(P) Case II Unit = cum (Height up to 5.0 m )
a) Material
Cement t 48.79 5006.4 2,44,262.26
Coarse sand cum 54.6 175.8 9,598.68
20 mm aggregate cum 64.8 595.36 38,579.33
10 mm aggregate cum 43.2 657.91 28,421.71
b) Labour
Mate day 0.88 325 286.00
c) Machinery
d) Formwork @ 25 % on (a+b+c) 96,928.74
e) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c+d) 1,23,049.50
g) CARRIAGE
Cement t 48.79 390.41 19,048.10
Coarse sand cum 54.6 3092.18 1,68,833.03
Aggregate cum 108 3481.39 3,75,990.12
38 13.2 1000
Supplying, fitting, and placing HYSD bar reinforcement in superstructure complete as per drawing
and technical specifications Clauses 1002, 1010 and 1202
a) Material
HYSD bars including 5 per cent for laps and wastage t 1.05 54,809.75 57,550.24
Binding wire kg 8.00 58.95 471.60
b) Labour for cutting, bending, tying and placing in position
Mate day 0.44 325.00 143.00
Blacksmith day 3.00 413.00 1,239.00
c) Over Heads Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 12,370.37
e) CARRIAGE
100
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
39 13.5 800 Haulage BY TIPPER

Providing and laying cement concrete wearing course M 30 grade including reinforcement complete
as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1206.3
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 0.43 5,006.40 2,152.75
Sand cum 0.45 175.80 79.11
20 mm aggregate cum 0.54 595.36 321.49
10 mm aggregate cum 0.36 657.91 236.85
HYSD bar reinforcement (Rate as per item 13.2) t 0.075 74,654.60 5,599.09
Binding Wire kg 0.01 58.95 0.59
b) Labour
Mate day 0.10 325.00 32.50
Bhisti day 0.27 306.00 82.62
Blacksmith day 0.30 413.00 123.90
c) Machinery
Concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity hour 0.40 1,289.30 515.72
d) Formwork @ 1% of cost of concrete 251.70
e) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit@ 20% on (a+b+c+d) 2,072.78
f) CARRIAGE
Cement t 0.43 390.41 167.88
Coarse sand cum 0.45 3,092.18 1,391.48
Aggregate cum 0.90 3,481.39 3,133.25
40 13.6 800 Construction of R.C.C. railing of M 25 grade in cast-in-situ with 20 mm nominal size aggregate, true to
line and grade, tolerance of vertical railing post not to exceed 1 in 500, centre-to-centre spacing
between vertical posts not to exceed 2000 mm as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800,
900 and 1208.3
Unit = Runing m
Taking output = 4x12 m
Span = 48 m
a) M 25 grade R.C.C.
No. of vertical posts = (6+1) 4 = 28 nos
Cross-sectional area of vertical post = 0.25x0.275 = 0.069 sqm
Concrete in vertical posts = 0.069 x28x1.00 = 1.932 cum
Hand rail in 3 tiers = 3x48 = 144 m
Cross-sectional area = 0.17x0.175 = 0.03 sqm
Concrete in hand rails = 0.03 x 144 = 4.32 cum
Total concrete = 1.932+4.32 = 6.252 cum cum 6.25 8,840.99 55,273.87
b) HYSD bar reinforcement (Rate as per item 13.2) t 1.36 74,654.60 1,01,530.25
c) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit@ 20% on (a+b) 31,360.82
e) CARRIAGE
Cost for 48 m = (a+b+c+d+e) 1,88,164.94
Rate per m = (a+b+c+d+e)/48 3,920.10
Sub Analysis for Rate of Concrete
a) Material
Cement t 0.40 5,006.40 2,002.56
Coarse sand cum 0.45 175.80 79.11
20 mm aggregate cum 0.54 595.36 321.49
10 mm aggregate cum 0.36 657.91 236.85
b) Labour
Mate day 0.08 325.00 26.00
Bhisti day 0.27 306.00 82.62
c) Machinery
Concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity hour 0.40 1,289.30 515.72
101
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
d) Formwork @ 12% of Materials Haulage BY TIPPER 316.80

e) Carrige cost
Cement t 0.40 390.41 156.16
Coarse sand cum 0.45 3,092.18 1,391.48
Aggregate cum 0.90 3,481.39 3,133.25
Total = (a+b+c+d+e) m 8,840.99
41 13.10 1200
Drainage spouts complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clause 1209
Unit = 1 No
a) Material
i) kg
Corrosion resistant structural steel grating including 5 per cent wastage 4.00 43.85 175.38
ii) G I pipe 100 mm dia m 1.00 522.42 522.42
b) Labour
For fabrication
Mate day 0.02 325.00 6.50
Blacksmith, Welder etc. (Skilled) day 0.02 413.00 8.26
For fixing in position
Mate day 0.01 325.00 3.25
7.23paint, mild
Add @ 5 per cent of cost of material and labour (a+b) for electrodes, gas cutting, sealant, anti-corrrosive bituminous
c) Over Heads Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 169.91
Rate per No = (a+b+c+d) no. 1,019.48
42 13.11 800 P.C.C. M 15 ordinary grade (1:2.5:5) levelling course below approach slab complete as per drawing
and technical specifications Clauses 800 and 1211.
II. P.C.C grade M 15
(i) Nominal mix (1:2.5:5)
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 0.275 5006.4 1,376.76
Coarse sand cum 0.48 175.8 84.38
40 mm aggregate cum 0.48 486.92 233.72
20 mm aggregate cum 0.24 595.36 142.89
10 mm aggregate cum 0.08 657.91 52.63
b) Labour
Mate day 0.08 325 26.00
Mason (1st Class) day 0.1 413 41.30
Mazdoor (Unskilled) day 1.63 306 498.78
Bhisti day 0.27 306 82.62
c) Machinery
Concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity hour 0.4 1289.3 515.72
e) Over Heads Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b) 610.96
g) CARRIAGE
Cement t 0.275 390.41 107.36
Coarse sand cum 0.48 3092.18 1,484.25
Aggregate cum 0.8 3481.39 2,785.11
43 13.12 800 Reinforced Cement Concrete M 30 grade apporach slab including reinforcement and formwork
complete as per drawing and technical specifications Clauses 800 & 1211.
Unit = cum
a) Material
Reinforced cement concrete M 30 grade (Rate as per Item 13.1
III) cum 1 10319.452 10,319.45
HYSD reinforcement (Rate as per item 13.2) t 0.05 74654.595 3,732.73
Rate per cum cum 14,052.18
PROTECTION WORK
44 14.1 1300 Providing and laying boulder apron for bed protection with stone boulders of minimum size and
weight as per Table 1300.1, no fragment weighing less than 25 kg laid dry complete as per drawing and
Unit = cum
a) Material
Stone boulder (25 kg minimum) cum 1.00 351.36 351.36
Stone spalls cum 0.20 351.36 70.27
b) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
e) CARRIAGE
102
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Stone boulder (25 Kg minimum ) Haulage BY TIPPER cum 1.00 3282.38 3,282.38
Stone spalls cum 0.20 3282.38 656.48
Rate per cum = a+b+c+d+e cum 4,909.27
45 14.5 1300 Providing and laying boulder pitching on slopes laid over prepared filter media as per drawing and
technical specifications Clause 1302
I. Stone/Boulder
Unit = cum
a) Material
Stone boulder (25 kg minimum) cum 1.00 351.36 351.36
Stone spalls of minimum 25 mm size cum 0.20 351.36 70.27
b) Labour
Mate day 0.04 325.00 13.00
e) CARRIAGE
Stone boulder (25 Kg minimum ) Nos 1.00 3,282.38 3,282.38
Stone spalls cum 0.20 3,282.38 656.48
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e) 4,909.27
SAY CUM 4,909.27
46 14.6 1300 Providing and laying filter material underneath pitching in slopes complete as per drawing and
technical specifications Clause 1302
Unit = cum
a) Material
Graded stone aggregate of required size cum 1.20 657.91 789.49
b) Labour
Mate day 0.05 325.00 16.25
e) CARRIAGE
Graded Stone Aggregate of required size cum 1.20 3,173.72 3,808.46
Rate per cum = (a+b+c+d+e) 5,266.30
SAY Cum 5,266.30
47 14.7 1300 Providing and laying flooring laid over cement concrete bedding complete as per drawing and
technical specification Clause 1303
(I) Rubble stone laid in cement mortar 1:3
Unit=cum
a) Material
Cement mortar (1:3) (Rate as in item 12.9) cum 0.15 6496.63 974.49
Cement concrete bedding (M10) cum 0.33 3015.49 995.11
b. Labour
Mate day 0.10 325.00 32.50
Bhisti day 0.20 306.00 61.20
e) CARRIAGE
Cement t 0.25 390.41 97.60
Coarse sand cum 0.48 3,092.18 1,484.25
Aggregate cum 0.96 3,481.39 3,342.13
Rate per cum = a+b+c+d+e 8,383.95
SAY cum 8,383.95
Sub Analysis for Rate of P.C.C grade M 10

(i) Nominal mix 1:3:6
Unit = cum
a) Material
Cement t 0.25 5,006.40 1,251.60
Coarse sand cum 0.48 175.80 84.38
40 mm aggregate cum 0.576 486.92 280.47
20 mm aggregate cum 0.288 595.36 171.46
10 mm aggregate cum 0.096 657.91 63.16
b) Labour
Mate day 0.08 325.00 26.00
Bhisti day 0.27 306.00 82.62
c) Machinery
Mechnical concrete mixer 0.4/0.28 cum capacity fitted with water hour
measuring device and
0.4 preferably
1289.3 515.72
also with load cell.
Rate per cum = a+b+c cum
103
3,015.49
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
49 15.1 1900 Restoration of Rain Cuts Haulage BY TIPPER

Restoration of rain cuts with soil, moorum gravel or a mixture of these, clearing the loose soil, benching
Unit = cum
Taking Output = 10 cum
a) Labour
Mate day 0.24 325.00 78.00
b) Machinery
Plate compactor hour 3.00 335.00 1,005.00
c) Material
Compensation for earth Taken from private land cum 7.50 34.82 261.15
d) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 397.52
Cost of 10 cum = (a+b+c+d) = 3,577.67
Cost per cum = (a+b+c+d)/10 357.77
say Cum 357.77
50 15.2 1900 Maintenance of Earthen shoulder (filling with fresh selected soil)
Making up loss of material/irregularities on shoulders to the design level by adding fresh approved
Unit = sqm
Taking Output = 100 Sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.2 325 65.00
b) Machinery
Hydraulic Excavator 0.9 cum bucket capacity @ 60 cum per
hour hour 0.25 2202 550.50
Tipper 5.5 cum hour 0.68 1518 1,032.24
Add 10% cost of transportation to cover cost of loading and
unloading 103.22
Plate compactor @ 25 sqm per hour hour 4 335 1,340.00
c) Material
Compensation for earth Taken from private land cum 7.5 34.82 261.15
d) Over Heads & Contractors profit @ 12.5% on (a+b+c) 610.26
Cost of 100 sqm = (a+b+c+d+e) = 5,492.38
Cost per sqm = (a+b+c+d+e)/100 54.92
say Sqm 54.92
Patch repair on already filled pot holes with 75 mm BM with 20 mm premix carpet and seal coat Type B as
51 15.3 ii. per drawings and technical specification Clause 1904.2
Unit = sqm
Takign output = 200 sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.64 325 2,369.28
b) Machinery
Mixall 6/10 tonne hour 2 3702 7,404.00
Bitumen pressure distributior hour 2 283 566.00
Three wheeled 80-100 kN Static Roller hour 4 1518 6,072.00
c) Material
Bitumen for pre-mix carpet @ 14.60 kg/10 sqm 200x14.60/10
=292 kg tonne 0.292 53406.82 15,594.79
Bitumen for tack coat @ 2 kg per 10 sqm 200 x 2 / 10 = 40 kg tonne 0.04 54823.82 2,192.95
Bitumen for seal coat @ 6.8 kg per 10 sqm
200 x 6.8 / 10 = 136 kg tonne 0.136 53406.82 7,263.33
Crushed stone aggregate @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm
= 200 x 0.27 / 10 = 5.4 cum cum 5.4 553.36 2,988.14
Crushed sand passing 2.36 mm sieve and retained on 180
mircon sieve @ 0.06 cum per 10 sqm cum 1.2 234.89 281.87
200 x 0.06 / 10 = 1.20 cum
Cost of 200 sqm = a+b+c+d+e 55,831.91
Rate/sqm = a+b+c+d+e/200 279.16
Carraige
Bitumen Emulsion Ton 0.0002 776.57 0.16
Bitumin 80/100 Ton 0.00215 776.57 1.67
Aggregate cum 0.033 3481.39 114.89
Rate per cum with carriage Sqm 395.87
52 15.3
iii.
Repair to pot holes and removal of loose material, trimming of sides, cleaning of surface by providing
tack coat, 20 mm thick pre-mix carpet and seal coat type B specification Clause 1904.2
104
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Unit = sqm Haulage BY TIPPER

a) Labour
Mate day 0.8 325 260.00
b) Machinery
Air compressor 210 cfm with tractor hour 2 391 782.00
Bitumen pressure distributor hour 2 283 566.00
Mixall 6/10t capacity hour 2 3702 7,404.00
Three wheeled 80-100 kN Static Roller hour 4 1518 6,072.00
c) Material
Bitumen for tack coat @ 3kg per 10 sqm 200 x 3 / 10 = 60 kg tonne 0.064 54823.82 3,508.72
Bitumen for pre-mix carpet @ 14.60 kg per 10 sqm = 200 x 14.6
/ 10 = 292 kg tonne 0.292 53406.82 15,594.79
Bitumen for seal coat @ 6.8 kg per 10 sqm
= 200 x 6.8 / 10 = 136 kg tonne 0.136 53406.82 7,263.33
Crushed stone aggregate @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm
= 200 x 0.27 / 10 = 5.4 cum cum 5.4 553.36 2,988.14
Crushed sand passing 2.36 mm sieve and retained on 180
micron sieve @ 0.06 cum per 10 sqm
200 x 0.06 / 10 = 1.20 cum cum 1.2 234.89 281.87
e) Contractor's profit @ 10% on a+b+c+d 0.00
Cost for 200 sqm = a+b+c+d+e 57,195.96
Rate per sqm = a+b+c+d+e/200 285.98
Carriage Cost
Bitumin Emulsion tonne 0.00115 776.57 0.89
Bitumin 80/100 tonne 0.0054 776.57 4.19
Aggregate Cum 0.033 3481.39 114.89
Total Rtae Sqm 405.95
53 15.5 1900 Maintenance of WBM Road Maintenance of WBM road including filling up of pot holes, ruts and rectifying
corrugated surface, damaged edges and ravelling as per technical specification Clause 1906.
Unit = sqm
Output - Taking affected area @ 5% in 1 km
= 1000 x 3.75 x 0.05 = 187.5 sqm
Quantity 187.5 x 0.075 = 14.06 cum
a) Rate as per item No. 4.7 of Chapter 4 Cum 14.06 6,376.08 89,647.73
b) Add 50% for Extra Efforts involved on maintenance to be
done in Small reachs 44,823.86
1,34,471.59
Cost of 187.5 Sqm = 717.18
Note:- The Cost of 25% Retrived Material may be deducted
from Rate 537.89
Cost per Sqm =
say Sqm 537.89
54 15.3 1900 Maintenance of Bituminous Surface Road
Patch repair on already filled pot holes with 75mm BM with 20mm Premix Carpet and seal coat Type B as per
drawing and technical specifications Clauses 1904.2, 508 and 510.
Unit = sqm
Taking Output = 200 sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.01 325.00 3.25
b) Machinery
Mixall 6/10 tonne hour 2.00 0.00 0.00
Bitumen Pressure distributor hour 2.00 283.00 566.00
Three wheeled 80-100 kN Static Roller hour 4.00 1,518.00 6,072.00
c) Material
Bitumen for pre-mix carpet @ 14.60 Kg/10 sqm 200 x 14.60/ 10 = 292 Kg tonne 0.292 53,406.82 15,594.79
Bitumen for tack coat @ 2 kg per 10 sqm 200 x 2/ 10 = 40 Kg tonne 0.04 53,406.82 2,136.27
Bitumen for seal coat @ 6.8 kg per 10 sqm 200 x 6.8/ 10 = 136 Kg tonne 0.136 53,406.82 7,263.33
Crushed stone aggregate @ 0.27 cum per 10 sqm 200 x 0.27/ 10 = 5.4 cum cum 5.40 454.98 2,456.89
Crushed sand passing 2.36 mm sieve and retained on 180 micron sieve
@0.06 cum per 10 sqm. cum 1.20 234.89 281.87
200 x 0.06/ 10 = 1.2 cum
Cost of 200 sqm = (a+b+c+d) = 38,774.48
Cost per sqm = (a+b+c+d+e)/200 193.87
say sqm 193.87
105
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
55 15.1 1900 Maintenance of RCC Railing Haulage BY TIPPER

Repair of RCC railing to bring it to the original shape, cleaning and repainting as per drawings and technical
Unit = running meter
Taking Output = 1 m
It is assumed that the damage is upto the extent of 10%
a) Labour
Mate day 0.012 325.00 3.90
b) Material
M-30 Grade Concrete cum 0.100 9,590.20 959.02
Steel Reinforcement tonne 0.013 74,654.60 970.51
c) Over Heads @ 20% on (a+b) 409.33
Rate per Meter = (a+b+c+d) m 2,455.96

56 '12.11 (iv) Sub-Analysis
C PCC grade M-35 (Analysis using MoRT&H Data Book)
Case I Using Concrete Mixer
Unit = 1 cum
(a) Material
Cement tonne 6.29 5,006.40 31,490.26
Coarse sand cum 6.75 175.80 1,186.65
40 mm Aggregate cum 5.40 486.92 2,629.37
20 mm Aggregate cum 5.40 595.36 3,214.94
10 mm Aggregate cum 2.70 657.91 1,776.36
Admixture Kg 21.60 100.00 2,160.00
(b) Labour
Mate day 0.90 325.00 292.50
(C) Machinery
Concrete mixer (cap. 0.40/0.28 cum) hour 6.00 1,289.30 7,735.80
Light Crane of 3 tonnes capacity for handling tremie pipe hour 6.00 2,930.00 17,580.00
d) CARRIAGE
Cement t 6.29 390.41 2,455.68
Coarse sand cum 6.75 3,092.18 20,872.22
Aggregate cum 13.50 3,481.39 46,998.77
Rate per cum = (a+b+c)/15 cum 9,873.47
57 10.16 1700 Providing and Fixing 'Logo' of Project
Providing and Fixing 'Logo' of Project informayory sign board with Logo as per MORD specifications and drawing.
Three MS plates of 1.6mm thick, top and middle plate duly welded with MS flat iron 25mm x 5 m size on back on
edges. The lower plate will be welded with MS angle iron frame of 25mm x 25mm 5mm. The angle iron frame of
the lower most plate and flat iron frame of middle plate will be welded to 2 Nos. 75mm x 75 mm of 12 SWG sheet
tubes posts duly embedded in cement concrete M-15 grade blocks of 450mm x 450mm x 600 mm,600 mm,600
below ground level. The top most diamond plate will be welded to middle plate by 47mm x 47mm of 12SWG steel
plate tube. All M.S will be stove enameled on both sides. Lettering and printing arrows, border etc, will be painted
with ready mixed synthetic enamer paint of superior quality in required shade and colour. All sections of framed
posts and steel tube will be painted with primer and two coats of epoxy paint as per drawing Clause 1701 abd
Annexure 1700.1.
Unit = each
Taking out put = one typical board
I) Excavation for foundation
As per item 11.1 of Chapter 11 cum 0.252 306.24 77.17
ii) Cement concrete M-15 grade
As per item 11.4 of Chapter 11 cum 0.252 8,189.12 2,063.66
iii) Painting on MS steel tubes with primer and two coats of epoxy paint
2 x 2.05 x 0.30 = 1.23

1 x 1.10 x 188 -0.21
As per item 10.7 of Chapter 10 sqm 1.800 97.03 174.65
iv) Printing new letters and figures of any shade with synthetic enamel
paint black or any other approved colour to give an even shade
Logo Border 60 x 4 x 5 =1200 per cm height per letter

Figure 60 x 10=600 per cm height per letter
Middle plate words 28 x 5 =140 per cm height per letter
Bottom plate borer 150 x 2x5 =1500 per cm height per letter
Words 101 x 2.5 =252.5
Words 80x3=240.00
Total = 4532.5 per cm height per letter
106
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Haulage BY TIPPER percm

As per item 10.1 of this chapter 10 hight per 4532.50 0.61 2,784.00
a) Labour (for fixing at site)
Mate day 0.03 325.00 9.75
Mazdoor (Un skilled) hour 0.75 306.00 229.50
b) Material
2 Nos. MS tubes 75mm x 75mm of 12 SWG sheet 26.50 mm long. kg 63.15 43.62 2,754.60
1 No. MS tube 47mm x 47mm of 12 SWG 1100mm long. kg 4.47 43.62 194.98
Angle Iron50mm x 50mm x 5 mm for lugs kg 2.12 46.66 98.91
1.6 mm thick MS sheet strengthened by 25 mm x 5 MS flat iron on logo
and middle plate angle Iron 25 mm x 25mm x 5mm on bottom plate
sqm 1.44 416.00 599.04
painting with stove enameled paint on both sies as per MORD
specifications.
Add 3 % cost of MS tube and angle iron towards cost of
fabrications,drilling holes, nuts, bolts etc.
c) Machinery
Cost for 1 board = (I+II+III+iv+a+b+c+d) 10,279.39
Rate per Board = 10,279.39
58 10.1 1700 Printing new Letters and Figures of any shade
Printing new letters and figures of any shade with synthetic enamel paint
black or any other approved colour to give an even shade as per drawing
and Technical specification Clause 1702
I) English and Roman
Hypens, commas and the like not to be measured and paid for. Detail for
100 leters of 160mm height i.e 1600 cm
Unit = per cm height per letter
a) Labour
Mate Day 0.07 325.00 22.75
Painter Day 1.25 391.00 488.75
Mazdoor (Unskilled) Day 0.50 306.00 153.00
b) Material
Paint Lit 0.50 224.02 112.01
c) Over Heads @ 12.5% on (a+b) 97.06
Cost for 1600 cm (a+b+c+d) 982.77
Rate per cm ht letter =(a+b+c+d) / 1600 0.61
Rate per Meter = (a+b+c) = 0.61
59 12.9 Providing and Constructing Temporary Earth Island
1200 A Assuming depth of water 1.0 m and height of island to be 1.25 m
including Royality for earth @ Rs. 5526.00 for each Island.
Unit = 1 No
Taking output = 1 No.
a) Material
Earth (compacted) cum 251.2 34.82 8,746.78
Sand bags each 750 8.46 6,345.00
b) Labour
Mate day 0.4 325.00 130.00
Mazdoor for filling sand bags, stitching and placing day 15 306.00 4,590.00
c) Machinery
Crane with grab 1 cum capacity hour 20 2,930.00 58,600.00
Consumables @ 2.5 per cent of (c) above 1,465.00
d) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c) 15,975.36
Rate per No.(a+b+c+d+e) 95,852.14
Note For other well diameters rate can be worked out on the basis of cross-
sectional area of well. The diameter of the island shall be in the
conformity with clause 1203.2 of MoRTH specifications.
60 12.9 Providing and constructing one span service road to reach island
location from one pier location to another pier location including
Royality for earth @ Rs. 225.00 per m for service Road.
C Assuming span length 30 m, width of service road 10m and depth of

water 1m
Unit = 1 meter
Taking output = 30 metre
a) Material
Earth cum 450.00 34.82 15,669.00
Sand bags each 300.00 8.46 2,538.00
b) Labour
Mate day 0.24 325.00 78.00
Mazdoor for filling sand bags, stitching and placing day 6.00 306.00 1,836.00
c) Machinery
Front end Loader 1 cum capacity hour 27.00 1594.00 43,038.00
Tipper 5.5 cum capacity hour 28.00 1518.00 42,504.00
d) Overhead Charges & Contractor Profit @ 20% on (a+b+c) 21,132.60
e) Contractors Profit @ 0% on (a+b+c+d) 107
0.00
No. Ref No. (in Rs)
Cost for 30 m (a+b+c+d+e) Haulage BY TIPPER 1,26,795.60

Rate per m (a+b+c+d+e)/30 4,226.52
59 9.3 Providing and Laying Reinforced Cement Concrete Pipe NP3 as per
design in Single Row
1100 Providing and laying reinforced cement concrete pipe NP3 for culverts on first class bedding of granular material in
single row including fixing collar with cement mortar 1:2 but excluding excavation, protection works, backfilling,
concrete and masonry works in head walls and parapets Clause 1106.
B. 1000 MM DIA
Unit =m
Taking output =7.5 m
( 3 pipes of 2.5 m length each )
a ) Material
I) Sand at site cum 0.04 297.21 11.89
ii ) Cement at site ton 0.03 5396.81 161.90
iii) RCC pipe NP 3 pipe including collar at site m 7.50 5903.84 44,278.80
b ) Labour
Mate day 0.09 325.00 29.25
Mason ( 1st class ) day 0.25 413.00 103.25
Mazdoor ( Unskilled ) day 2.00 306.00 612.00
c)Overheads @10 % on (a+b) 4,519.71
d)Contractor’s profit @ 10% on (a+b+c) 4,971.68
Cost for 7.5m = ( a+b+c+d) 54,688.48
Rate per m =(a+b+c+d)/7.5 7,291.80
60 14.22 2607 Strip Seal Expansion Joint (Providing and laying of a strip seal expansion joint catering to maximum horizontal
movement upto 70 mm, complete as per approved drawings and standard specifications to be installed by the
manufacturer/supplier or their authorised representative ensuring compliance to the manufacturer's instructions
for installation.)
Unit = Running meter
a) Labour
Mate Day 0.05 325.00 16.25
Mazdoor Day 1.00 306.00 306.00
Mazdoor (Skilled) Day 0.25 388.00 97.00
b) Material
Supply of Cmplete assembly of strip seal expension joint comprising of
edgr beams, anchorege, strip seal element and complete accessories as metre 12.00 6,398.35 76,780.20
per approved specification and drawing.
Add 5 % of cost of material for anchorage reinforcement, welding and
other incidentals (a+b) 3,859.97
c)Overheads @20 % on (a+b) 16,211.88
d)Contractor’s profit @ 10% on (a+b+c) 0.00
Rate per MT (a+b+c+d)/12 8,105.94
61 14.18 2605 Providing & fixing 20 mm thick compressible fibre board in expansion joint complete as per drawing & Technical
(ii) Specification.
a) Labour (For carrying, placing & fixing)
Mate Day 0.008 325.00 2.60
Mazdoor Day 0.10 306.00 30.60
b) Material
20mm thick compressible fibre board 12 m long x 25 cm deep (Area =
SQM 3.00 842.89 2,528.67
12x 0.25 = 3 sqm)
c)Overheads @20 % on (a+b) 520.13
Rate per MT (a+b+c+d)/12 260.07
Total Cost including 260.07
62 14.18 2605 Providing and fixing in position 20 mm thick premoulded joint filler in expansion joint for fixed ends of simply
(iii) supported spans not exceeding 10 m to cater for a horizontal movement upto 20 mm, covered with sealant
complete as per drawing and technical specifications.
a) Labour
Mate Day 0.01 325.00 3.25
Mazdoor Day 0.20 306.00 61.20
b) Material
Premoulded Joint filler 12 m long, 20 mm thick and 300 mm deep SQM 3.60 986.53 3,551.51
c)Overheads @20 % on (a+b) 730.95
Rate per MT (a+b+c+d)/12 402.02
Total Cost including 402.02
108
CHAPTER-8
TRAFFIC SIGNS, MARKINGS & OTHER ROAD APPURTENANCES
Ref. to
MoRT
Sr No Description Unit Quantity Rate Rs Cost Rs
H
Spec.
8.13 803 Road Marking with Hot Applied Thermoplastic Compound with Reflectorising Glass
Beads on Bituminous Surface
Providing and laying of hot applied thermoplastic
compound 2.5 mm thick including reflectorising
glass beads @ 250 gms per sqm area, thickness
of 2.5 mm is exclusive of surface applied glass
beads as per IRC:35 .The finished surface to be
level, uniform and free from streaks and holes.
Unit = sqm
a) Labour
Mate day 0.5 325 162.50
Mazdoor day 2 306 612.00
b) Machinery
Road marking machine @ 80 sqm per hour hour 8 141.8 1134.40
Tractor-trolley hour 8 629 5032.00
c) Material
Hot applied thermoplastic compound Litre 2000 183.25 366500.00
Reflectorising glass beads kg 200 65.04 13008.00
d) Overheads & Contractor’s profit@ 12.5 % on (a+b+c) 48306.1125
Cost for 640 sqm = a+b+c+d+e 434755.01
Rate per sqm = a+b+c+d+e)/640 679.304707
Total Cost say 679.30
Page 1 of 46
109
GEOTECHNICAL REPORT
110
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT
FOR MINOR BRIDGE
PROJECT
CONSTRUCTION OF RCC BRIDGE AT PIPRA TO GARDI
CH:3+100Km
CLIENT
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PWD(WORKS)
DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN
111
Geotechnical Investigation Report for MNB
CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1
2 SCOPE OF WORK ...................................................................................................... 1
3 FIELD WORK .............................................................................................................. 1
4 LABORATORY TESTS ................................................................................................ 2
5 DESIGN METHODOLOGY .......................................................................................... 3
6 RECOMMENDATION .................................................................................................. 4
Annexure
Annexure I : SBC Calculations
112
1 INTRODUCTION :-
CONSTRUCTION OF RCC BRIDGE AT PIPRA TO GARDI.
Objective of the geotechnical investigation is to ascertain sub-soil parameters for appropriate

design of the foundation system.
2 SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work is conducting confirmatory geotechnical investigation for the proposed
construction of MNB as per the specifications and direction given by the client.
The detailed scope of work includes the following
Conducting Standard Penetration Test (SPT) at foundation level
Collecting UDS sample at foundation level
Conducting relevant laboratory tests.
Recommendations for the foundations.
3 FIELD WORK
Field investigations were carried out on 12 Feb to 15 Feb 22. Brief methodologies of standard
penetration test and sampling works are given below.
3.1 STANDARD PENETRATION TEST (SPT)
Standard Penetration Tests (SPT) was conducted at proposed foundation level in open pit as
per Indian Standard IS:2131-1981 and split spoon sampler used conformed to the Indian
Standard IS:9640-1980. These tests were performed by driving the sampler with 63.5kg
hammer falling from a height of 75cm. Number of blows required to effect each 15cm
penetration is recorded. The first 15cm penetration is considered to be the seating drive. The
sum of the total blows required for a second and third 15cm (total 30cm) penetration is termed
the penetration resistance SPT' N' value and the same is reported
113
When the number of blows exceeded 50 to penetrate the first or second 15 cms length of the
sampler, the SPT N is regarded as more than 100 as described in IS 2131 - 1981. The test is
terminated in such case and a record of penetration of the sampler under 50 blows is made.
SPT refusal is recorded when there is no penetration of the sampler at any stage and also
when a rebound of the sounding system is recorded.
Disturbed soil collected in the SPT sampler was preserved in polythene covers and
transported to the laboratory.
SPT values obtained at the foundation level are tabulated below. Depth of Soil collected
at 22m.
Sl Foundation SPT ‘N’ Value
Location
No. RL 15cm 30cm 45cm N
1 SPT-1 76.703 11 16 19 35
3.2 Sampling
Disturbed soil samples were collected from SPT spoon and UDS samples collected at
proposed foundation level and subsequently sent to laboratory for visual examination and
laboratory tests.
4 LABORATORY TESTS
Laboratory tests were carried out on soil samples as per the relevant Indian Specifications.
Details of various tests conducted are presented below.
A) Tests on soil samples:
The following tests have been performed for soil samples:
Bulk Density and moisture contents;
Grain size analysis tests as per IS:2720 (Part -IV)
Atterberg’s limits-liquid limit and plastic limit as per IS: 2720 (Part-V)
Direct shear test as per IS:2720 (Part -XIII)
On sandy samples grain size distribution analysis test were conducted using both dry and wet
sieve analysis techniques. These tests are completed primarily to classify and to find out the
gradation characteristics.
In general on clayey samples Atterberg's Limit tests are conducted to derive the engineering
characteristic.
114
Laboratory tests are presented below:

Laboratory Test Results
Atterberg's Grain Size Distribution (%)
Moisture Content
Strength
Classification
Limits Sand Silt & Parameters*
Sampling RL
Clay
Soil
ø(Degrees
SPT "N"
2)
Description
Sample
Gravel
c(kN/
IS
wL wP Coarse Medium Fine M C
(%)
)
SPT1 76.703 35 Sandy soil SC 17.2 25 12 0 35 26 29 9 0 31
*- conducted on remoulded sample
5 DESIGN METHODOLOGY
PILE FOUNDATION
The safe bearing capacity is arrived based on the shear failure criteria and settlement criteria.
The estimated safe bearing capacity is calculated as per IS: 6403-1981 code and IS: 8009
(Part-1)-1976 with available soil profile.
A properly designed foundation has to satisfy two limit states.

1) Limit state of collapse (ie., Shear strength)
2) Limit state of serviceability (ie., Settlement)
Shear Criteria
The first criterion is depending on shear strength. The calculations are based on “TERZAGHI "
bearing capacity equation as recommended by IS:6403 (with factor of Safety 2.5) which takes
care of L/B ratio (shape), foundation depth etc., along with other parameters.
The intensity of loading at the base of the foundation, which would cause shear failure of the
soil support, is termed as ultimate bearing capacity (UBC).
The following equation is used to calculate ultimate bearing capacity,
UBC = C*Nc*Sc*dc + q * (Nq-1) * Sq * dq + 0.5 * B *  * N * S * d * W'
Safe bearing capacity (SBC) is the maximum intensity of loading that the foundation will safely
carry without the risk of shear failure of soil irrespective of any settlement that may occur. Safe
bearing capacity can be obtained by dividing the UBC with suitable factor of safety (2.5).
SBC = UBC/2.5
115
Settlement Criteria:
The intensity of loading that will cause a permissible settlement or specified settlement of the
structure is termed as allowable bearing pressure.
The elastic settlement of granular soil and consolidated settlement of cohesive soils are
calculated using SPT ‘N’ values and laboratory test results. Settlement is predicted using IS:
8009 (part-1)-1976.
A sample calculation for estimation of safe bearing capacity is given in Annexure-I.
6 RECOMMENDATION
PILE foundations are recommended in the form of isolated foundation or raft foundation as
follows,
Safe Bearing Capacity

Location Foundation RL (t/m2)
MNB@ CH:
3+400Km
76.703 15
116
Annexure – I
SBC Calculations
117
Bearing Capacity Based on Shear Criteria
(Based on IS: 6403-
1981)
Sandy soil with
Type of soil at founding level = Gravel
Ground water table location (Dw) = 6.0 m
3
Unit weight of soil () = 2.0 t/m
3
Submerged unit of soil (') = 1.0 t/m
Condition of soil = Medium (Relative Density 36%)
Type of footing: = Pile foundation
Dia. of footing (B) = 1.0 m
Length of footing(L) = 20.0 m
Depth of footing from basement (Df) = 1.5 m
Average Corrected 'N' value at base of footing = 39
Angle of internal friction () = 31 deg.
Cohesion (C) = 0 t/m2

If  value is in between local & general shear failure. As per
IS: 6403 - 1981 the SBC value is to be interpolated between
 = 36 deg (for general shear failure)
 = 29 deg (for local shear failure)
A) Local shear failure:

' = tan-1 (0.67 tan) = 21 deg.
Bearing capacity factors
Nc' = 14.83
Nq' = 6.40
N' = 5.39
Shape factors:
Sc = 1.01
Sq = 1.01
S = 0.98
Inclination factors:
ic = iq = i =1
Depth factors:
dc = 1.02
dq = 1.01
d = 1.01
Effective overburden pressure (q) = 1.50 t/m2

Factor of safety (F.S) = 2.5
Ultimate bearing capacity (UBC)

UBC = C' *Nc' * Sc * dc *ic + q * (Nq' - 1)* Sq * dq * iq +0.5 *B* * N' * S * d * i *w
Where w = Water table correction factor
w = 1.7
118
Bearing Capacity Based on Shear Criteria
(Based on IS: 6403-1981)
2
Ultimate bearing capacity (Local) = 17.33 t/m
Safe bearing capacity as per shear criteria,
(SBC) Local = UBC/F.S = 6.93 t/m2
B) General Shear Failure:

 = 36 deg.
Bearing capacity factors
Nc = 51.00
Nq = 38.00
N = 57.00
Depth factors
dc = 1.59
dq = 1.29
d = 1.29
2
Over burden pressure (q =  ' * Df) = 1.50 t/m
Factor of safety (F.S) = 2.5
Ultimate bearing capacity (UBC)
UBC = C *Nc * Sc * dc *ic + q * (Nq - 1)* Sq * dq * iq +0.5 *B* * N * S * d * i *w
2
= 194.81 t/m
2
(SBC)general = UBC/F.S = 77.92 t/m
From above Local & General shear failures the SBC for actual case can be calculated as follows
Actual SBC = (SBC)local + {[(SBC)general - (SBC)local] / (36-29)} * ( - 29)
Therefore,
2
Actual SBC = 27.22 t/m
Recommended SBC = 15 t/m2
Reporting of Results:
As per the design requirements of PILE Foundations we need to attain minimum
SAFE BEARING CAPACITY of Foundation Soil as 15T/M2. But, as per testing we are
achieving 27.22T/M2 at Abutment No-1. Hence results are satisfactory.
119
Site Photographs Pipra To Gardi Ch: 3+160Km
120
Site Photographs Pipra To Gardi Ch: 3+160Km
121
HYDRAULICS
122
PMGSY (GOVT. OF BIHAR)
Hydrological Calculation of Bridges
RCC T-Girder Bridge
Name of Road: Construction of RCC Bridge at Pipra To Gardi

Block: Ramnagar
District: West Champaran
Location of Bridge: Ch: 3+100 Km
Span Arrangement: 8 x 18.5m
Length of Bridge: 160.18 m
Design Discharge: 286.72 cumec.
Design Velocity: 1.947 m/s
Design HFL: 100.923 m
Design FRL: 103.513 m
Top of Abutment/Pier cap: 101.573 m
Lowest Bed level at Pier: 98.137 m
Lowest Bed level at Abutment: 99.710 m
Lowest Bed level at Bank: 99.710 m
123
Detailed Hydraulic Calculations
Introduction:
The length of a bridge, its depth of foundation etc. are dependent on the maximum recorded quantum of
water or flood discharge which has passed through the river or the channel over which the bridge is
proposed and as such the design discharge is very important not only from economic consideration but also
from safety or stability consideration. Therefore, the design discharge, which might be the recorded
dischrge during the past 50-100 years, shall be ascertained very carefully.
There are various methods for the estimation of flood discharge like:
1. Catchment-Run-off Method from rainfall and other characteristics of the catchment by the use of
empirical formulae or by Rational Method.
2. By using Empirical Formulae.
3. From hydraulic characteristics of the stream such as the conveyance factor and slope of the stream.
4. From area of cross-section and velocity as observed on the stream at the bridge site.
5. From recorded flood discharge near the bridge site.
The use of a particular method depends upon (i) the desired objective, (ii) the available data and (iii) the
importance of the project. Further the Rational Method is found to be suitable for peak flow prediction in
small catchments upto 50 km2 in area. It finds considerable application in urban drainage designs and in the
design of small bridges and culverts.
Below, the flood discharge is estimated only by the first two methods written above. The third method
cannot be used for the hydraulic calculations as it is not possible to measure the velocity of the stream at the
bridge site as the stream is dry now. The fourth or last method is not used as the recorded flood discharge
near the bridge site is not available.
124
1.) Rational Method to calculate Peak Run-off from Catchment:
Step I - Input data:-

Area of Catchment (A): = 5000 Ha
Distance from the critical point to the Outlet (L): = 5.000 km
Fall in level from the critical point to the Outlet (H): = 2.500 m
The values of H and L can be found from the contour map of the catchment area.
One - hour Rainfall (I0):
Value of I0 can be worked out if the total rainfall and the duration of the severest storm are known. If these
data are not available for some place, for that Meteorological Department of the Government of India, have
supplied the heaviest rainfall in mm/hour experienced by various places in India. For Gaya, the I0 is
considered mentioned below.
Hence, I0 (ref. IRC:SP: 13-2004 Appendix- A) = 6.99 cm
Percentage coefficient of Run-off for the Catchment Characteristics (P):
Coefficient P depends on the (i) porosity of the soil, (ii) area, shape and the size of the catchment, (iii)
vegetation cover, (iv) surface storage viz. existence of lakes and marshes, and (v) initial state of wetness of
soil. The values of P for the various conditions of the catchment area are given below:
Table 4.1 (IRC:SP: 13-2004): Maximum Value of P :-
Sl. No. Characteristics of the catchment Value of P
8 Sandy soil, light growth 0.20
Hence, P for Catchment charaterised by Sandy soil, light growth = 0.20
Fraction spread of storm over the catchment (f):

The mean intensity of the storm depends on the catchment area. The larger the area considered the smaller
would be the mean intensity,i.e., the mean intensity is some inverse function of the size of the catchment.
The relation of f with A can be represented by the curve given in Fig. 4.2 of IRC:SP: 13-2004, shown
below:
Hence, from curve 'f' for catchment area of 5000 hectares = 0.83
125
Step II - Estimating the Concentration time of a Catchment (t c ):-
The time of concentration is to be calculated by the formula given below:
tc = (0.87 x L3/H)0.385 = (0.87 x 5^3 /2.5 )^0.385 = 4.27 hr
Step III - Calculation of Critical/ Design Intensity (I c ):-

The Design Intensity is given by the formula:
Ic = 2 x I0 /(tc + 1) = 2 x 6.99 /(4.27 + 1 ) = 2.7 cm/hr
Step IV - Calculation of Run-off (Q):-

Q = 0.028 x Ic x f x P x A = 0.028 x 2.7 x 0.83 x 0.2 x 5000 = 62.75 m3/s
Design Discharge = 63 m3/s

0.5
Regime width = 4.8 x (Q) = 38.10 m
126
2. Design Discharge Calculation ( AREA OF VELOCITY METHOD)

Construction of RCC Bridge at Pipra To Gardi
Longitudinal slope= 0.0062 HFL= 100.923 m Manning's coeff., n = 0.050
C/S of Chainage 50.0m U/S

Bed Level
Actual Modified Average Horizontal Area, A Difference Wetted Hydraulic Velocity, V = Discharge
101.500
Chainage H.F.L Bed Level Bed Level Height Height Distance 6x7 in h Perimeter, P Mean Depth, R ( R2/3 x S1/2 )/ n Q= AxV
101.000
(m) (m) (m) h h' x h" sqrt(7*7+9*9) (A/P) m/sec m3/sec 100.500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 100.000
-0+043 101.233 101.233 101.233 0.000 99.500
-0+034 101.233 99.615 99.615 1.618 0.809 8.718 7.053 1.618 8.867 99.000
-0+031 101.233 98.971 98.971 2.262 1.940 3.470 6.732 0.644 3.529 98.500
0+000 101.233 98.423 98.423 2.810 2.536 30.840 78.210 0.548 30.845 98.000
0+019 101.233 98.655 98.655 2.578 2.578 18.510 47.719 0.232 18.511 97.500
0+022 101.233 100.006 100.006 1.227 1.903 3.079 5.858 1.351 3.362 97.000
-0+043
-0+034
-0+031
0+000
0+019
0+022
0+024
0+024 101.233 101.233 101.233 0.000 0.614 2.796 1.716 1.227 3.054
C/S of Chainage 50.0m U/S H.F.L
Avg.depth 1.730 Total 147.287 68.169 2.161 2.63 387.654
C/S of Chainage B/S

Bed Level
Chainage H.F.L Bed Level Bed Level Height Height Distance 6x7 in h Perimeter, P Mean Depth, R ( R2/3 x S1/2 )/ n Q= AxV 101.500
(m) (m) (m) h h' x h" sqrt(7*7+9*9) (A/P) m/sec m3/sec 101.000
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 100.500
-0+039 100.923 100.923 100.923 0.310 100.000
99.500
-0+021 100.923 99.710 99.710 1.523 0.917 18.060 16.552 1.213 18.101
99.000
-0+016 100.923 98.911 98.911 2.322 1.923 5.028 9.667 0.799 5.091
98.500
0+000 100.923 98.137 98.137 3.096 2.709 15.912 43.105 0.774 15.931 98.000
0+006 100.923 98.201 98.201 3.032 3.064 6.280 19.242 0.064 6.280 97.500
0+011 100.923 99.809 99.809 1.424 2.228 4.900 10.917 1.608 5.157 97.000
0+018 100.923 100.001 100.001 1.232 1.328 7.310 9.708 0.192 7.313 96.500
-0+021
-0+016
-0+039
0+000
0+006
0+011
0+018
0+045
0+045 100.923 100.923 100.923 0.310 0.771 26.510 20.439 0.922 26.526
C/S of Chainage B/S H.F.L
Avg.depth 1.848 Total 129.630 84.399 1.536 2.10 271.755
PMGSY-Bihar
127

-0+021
-0+016
-0+039
C/S of Chainage 50.0m U/S

Bed Level
C/S of Chainage 50.0m D/S
Bed Level
101.500
Chainage H.F.L Bed Level Bed Level Height Height Distance 6x7 in h Perimeter, P Mean Depth, R ( R2/3 x S1/2 )/ n Q= AxV
(m) (m) (m) h h' x h" sqrt(7*7+9*9) (A/P) m/sec 3 101.000
m /sec
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 100.500
-0+038 101.233 101.233 101.233 0.000 100.000
-0+015 101.23 100.209 100.209 1.024 0.512 22.273 11.404 1.024 22.297 99.500
-0+009 101.23 99.130 99.130 2.103 1.564 6.080 9.506 1.079 6.175
99.000
0+000 101.23 98.948 98.948 2.285 2.194 9.250 20.295 0.182 9.252
0+014 101.23 98.781 98.781 2.452 2.369 14.122 33.448 0.167 14.123 98.500
0+020 101.23 99.400 99.400 1.833 2.143 6.008 12.872 0.619 6.040 98.000
0+026 101.23 100.071 100.071 1.162 1.498 6.220 9.314 0.671 6.256 97.500
-0+015
-0+009
-0+038
0+000
0+014
0+020
0+026
0+037
0+037 101.23 101.233 101.233 0.000 0.581 10.771 6.258 1.162 10.834
C/S of Chainage 50.0m D/S H.F.L
Avg.depth 1.551 Total 103.097 74.976 1.375 1.95 200.765
Summery:
99.000
Long Slope
Bead Level, m
Velocity (V, Discharge (Q, Lowest Bed 98.800
S.No. Loaction Chainage Long Slope
m/s) cu.m) level 98.600
1 U/S 50 m 2.632 387.654 98.423 0.0000 98.400
2 B/S 0m 2.096 271.755 98.137 0.0057 98.200
3 D/S 50 m 1.947 200.765 98.781 0.0129 98.000
97.800
50 m 0m 50 m
Design HFL= 100.923 m
U/S B/S D/S
Maximum Velocity= 1.947 m/s
Average Discharge= 286.72 cu.m Say 287 cu.m Long Slope
Average Long slope= 0.0062
PMGSY-Bihar
128

3. Discharge by C/S
Dicken's Formula:
of Chainage 50.0m U/S
Bed Level
Dickens Formula:
Area of Catchment (A): = 5000.0 Ha Ánual Rail Fall: 1192.0 mm/hr
Dickens Constant, CD : = 14
3/4
Discharge = CD x (A) = 263 m3/s
Design Discharge = 286.7 m3/s
PMGSY-Bihar
129
Calculation of Waterway & Scour Depth

Design discharge, Q = 287 cumec
Regime width, W = C x sqrt(Q) = = 81.28 m (Where C= 4.8) 52.83078
Width restriction upto 33.0% = 26.82 m 55.17078
Regime width after restriction = 54.46 m
R.L. of HFL = 100.923 m
Design Discharge of the bridge location, Q = 372.74 cumec.
Type of Bridge: RCC T-Girder

Proposed Span Scheme :
Span provided= 18.50 m No. of Span= 8
Hence Total length of the Bridge = 160.18 m
Width of individual pier shaft = 1.00 m Skew angle: 0
Width of obstruction = 8.58 m
No. of intermediate supports = 7 Nos.
Bank to Bank Distance at site 160.18 m Actual length= 160.18 m
Effective Linear Waterway (Le) = 151.60 m (Bank to bank)
HFL = 100.923 m
Q = 372.74 cumec
Le = 151.60 m
Db = 2.46 cumec/m
Ksf = 1.0 Considering silt factor 0.6 as per IRC 78:2014
S = 0.0062
2 1/3
dsm = 1.34*(Db /Ksf)^
2.441 m
For abutment, 1.27*dsm = 3.10 m
For Pier, 2*dsm = 4.88 m
RL of scour for Abutment = 97.823 m

RL of scour for Pier = 96.041 m
PMGSY-Bihar
130
Hydrological Calculation of Bridge
Calculation of Afflux Height
Proposed Span Scheme :

Hence total length of the bridge for the river proper = 160.18 m
Width of individual pier shaft = 1 m
Width of pile cap = 1.5 m
Width of obstruction = 9.58 m
No. of intermediate supports = 7 Nos.
Effective Linear waterway, Le = 151.60 m
Design discharge= 286.72 cu.m
II
II 2 1 A Df
Hs Medium
sandy
dense
silt layer
silty
Deepest
sand Scour Level at 2000
RL 27.228m
AFFLUX HEIGHT cf soil
soil layer
layer
Average velocity of flow = V = 1.947 m/sec.
Un-obstructed area of flow = A1 = 160.18 m (Area of flow at bridge site)
Obstructed area of flow = A = 151.60 m 2.25
Afflux at H.F.L. by Molesworth formula :

2
V2 A1
h = + 0.0153 1
17.86 A
Hence, h= 0.026 m. = 26.0 mm
MINIMUM FREE BOARD

Minimum free board recommended = (Vide Clause 106.2.1 of IRC:5) 0.90 m.
Additional free-board required for Afflux = 0.026 m.
Total Free-board required = 0.926 m, say = 0.95 m.
Design FRL:
Hence soffit level of girder of superstructure = 101.87 m
Depth of superstructure = 1.575 m
FRL already provided= 103.513 m
Thk of wearing course = 0.065 m
Hence deck top level of the bridge = 103.513 m Hence proposed FRL is Ok
PMGSY-Bihar
131
BRIDGE DESIGN
132
CONTRUCTION OF RCC BRIDGE IN PIPRA TO
GARDI AT CH-3+100 Km
Design of Abutment for ( 20 m span standard )
Revision no. Date
133
CONTENTS
Sl. No. Item Description Page
INTRODUCTION
1.0 BASIC DESIGN DATA
2.0 LOAD CALCULATION FROM SUPERSTRUCTURE
3.0 SEISMIC COEFFICIENT CALCULATION
4.0 EARTH PRESSURE COEFFICIENT CALCULATION
5.0 SHEAR RATING
6.0 LIVE LOAD CALCULATION
7.0 SEISMIC FORCES AT BEARING LEVEL FROM SUPERSTRUCTURE
8.0 CALCULATION OF FORCES DUE TO EARTH PRESSURE
9.0 CALCULATION OF FORCES ON ABUTMENT AND FOUNDATION
10.0 LOAD COMBINATION (LIMIT STATE)
11.0 DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT
16.0 DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP
17.0 DESIGN OF DIRT WALL
18.0 DESIGN OF END RETURN WALL
19.0 Appendix 2: OUTPUT SUMMARY OF OASYS FOR ABUTMENT SHAFT
134
INTRODUCTION
State M
1. General
This design note pertains to the design of proposed abutment A1 & A2 of MNB Pipra To Gardi
The Super structure consists of RCC girder and deck slab of overall span 1X20m supported on bearing.
Skew angle is 0 degree. The substructure consists of RCC wall type abutment on pile foundation.
Following components of substructure and foundation are designed

1 Abutment Shaft
2 Abutment cap
3 Dirt wall
4 Return wall
2. Codes and Specifications

Following codes have been used in the design
Sl.No. Code Year of Publication
1 IRC : 6 2017
2 IRC : 112 2011
3 IRC : 78 2014
3. Loads
1 Dead load (Due to self weight of superstructurre, substructure, foundation and backfill weight)
2 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) excluding wearing course due to crash barrier, footpath and railing
(if present)
3 Superimposed Dead Load (SIDL) due to wearing course
4 Carriageway live load
i. 1 lane of 70R Wheeled
ii. 1 lane of Class A
5 Earth pressure due to backfill
6 Seismic force
7 Wind load is not considered as it is not governing
4. Load Combinations for Limit State

Following Limit States are considered
A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of Equilibrium)

A-1 Basic Combination
A-2 Seismic Combination
B Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)

B-1 Basic Combination
B-2 Seismic Combination
C Serviceability Limit State

C-1 Rare Combination (For checking stress limits)
C-2 Quasi-permanent Combination (For checking crack width in RCC structures)
D Combination for Design of Foundation

D-1 Combination 1
D-2 Combination 2
D-3 Seismic Combination
Accidental combination is not considered for abutment
135
5. Design Philosophy
Design is done using limit state method
i. Stability against horizontal force

Horizontal capacity is checked using load combinations of Basic Combination
ii. Vertical load capacity Check

Vertical load capacity check is performed from load combinations of unfactored loads according to notification no 78,
dated 28th July 2012
iii. Design of Abutment shaft

Abutment shaft is designed as rectangular column subjected to axial load and biaxial bending
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using Interaction diagram
Basic and seismic combination is used for checking ULS strength. Rare combination is used for checking
stress. Quasi-permanent combination is used for checking crack width.
iv. Design of Pile (stress check)

ULS design is done using Combination 1 and Seismic Combination while stress is checked using Combination 2.
Crack width is controlled by adjusting bar diameter and spacing.
v. Design of Abutment Cap

The Abutment cap is reinforced with a minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both faces
and in both directions. Cantilever/corbel action is checked in longitudinal direction.
vi. Design of Dirt Wall

Dirt wall is checked for ULS for basic combination. Stress is checked using rare combination
vii. Design of End Return Wall

End return wall is checked for basic combination.
136
BASIC DESIGN DATA
1 Basic Design Data
1.1 Span and Cross section Data
C/C of expansion gap = 20.00 m (Sq.)
C/C of bearing = 18.50 m (Sq.)
Distance of bearing to expansion gap = 0.75 m (Sq.)
Carriageway width = 7.50 m
Total width = 8.40 m
Column width for spill through abutment = 8.40 m
Column length parallel to traffic = 1.00 m
Column no = 1.00
Column spacing c/c = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Footpath Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
Crash Barrier Width (Left side) = 0.45 m
Crash Barrier Width (Right side) = 0.45 m
Handrail kerb Width (Left side) = 0.00 m
Handrail kerb Width (Right side) = 0.00 m
o
Skew Angle = 0.0 0.000radians
Deck Cantilever 1.20 m
1.2 Superstructure Details

Depth of superstructure = 1.575 m
CG of superstructure = 1.092 m
Thickness of wearing coat = 0.065 m
CG of wearing coat = 1.608 m
No. of Girders = 3
Distance of FRL from bearing of least height = 2.04 m
Spacing between girders = 3 m (RCC I girder)
Cross-slope = 2.00%
Minimum thickness of wedge = 0.000 m
Thickness of nearest bearing+pedestal = 0.300 m
1.3 Material Data

Grade of concrete fck = M30
Design strength of concrete fcd 13.40 MPa
Grade of steel fyk = Fe500
Design strength of steel fyd 434.8 MPa
3
Density of concrete = 2.5 t/m
3
Density of wearing course = 2.2 t/m
o
Coefficient of Thermal Expansion of concrete = 1.20E-05 / C (Cl.215.4, IRC 6 2014)
Shrinkage strain = 2.0E-04 (Cl.217.3, IRC 6 2014)
Modulus of Elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of concrete Ec = 3.1E+04 MPa
Mean axial tensile strength of concrete fctm = 2.5 MPa
1.4 Typical Levels

Formation Level "FRL" = 103.513 m
Dirt wall level = 103.513 m
Bearing level = 101.873 m
Abutment cap level "CTL" = 101.570 m
Stem top level = 100.770 m
Front Ground level "GL" = 98.703 m
Scour level = 97.823 m refer hydrology
Pile cap top level = 98.203 m
Pile cap bottom level (actual) = 96.703 m
Pile cap bottom level (design) "FL" = 96.703 m
Highest flood level "HFL" = 100.923 m
137
1.5 Soil Parameters
Angle of Shear resistance"f" = 30 o
3
Density of Dry Backfill "gd" = 2.00 t/m
3
Density of Submerged Backfill "gsub" = 1.00 t/m
Allowable Compressive load on piles (t) = 200.00 t
Dia of pile = 1.00 m
Allowable uplift (t) = 50.00 t
Horizontal capacity of pile (t) = 25.00 t
length below pile cap bottom (m) = 20.00 m
Live load surcharge = 1.20 m
Type of soil = Medium Soil
Coefficient of friction between = 0.50
(Soil/Rock and concrete)
1.6 Abutment Dimensions (Square)

Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at top = 1.67 m
Length of abutment cap in L-L direction at bottom = 0.80 m
Width of abutment (sqr) = 8.40 m
Width of pile cap in transverse direction (sqr) = 10.30 m
Width of pile cap in longitudinal direction ( SQr) = 4.30 m
Width of heel(sqr) = 1.65 m
Minimum thickness of pile cap = 1.50 m
Heel thickness at root = 1.50 m
Toe thickness at root = 1.50 m
Stem top thickness(straight) = 1.00 m
Stem bottom thickness(straight) = 1.00 m
Dirtwall thickness = 0.40 m
Depth of abutment cap (Constant portion) = 0.40 m
Depth of abutment cap (Varying portion) = 0.40 m
Thickness of return wall (Avg.) = 0.50 m
No. of return wall = 2
Horizontal distance of CG of abutment shaft from vertical face = 0.50 m
Provision of weep holes in abutment wall = Yes
Length of expansion gap = 0.020 m
0.00 0.40 1.10

FRL 103.513m
1.943 Bearing Lvl 101.873m
CTL 101.570m
1.67 0.40
0.40
1.00
1.010 1.67-1.01-1 1.65
-0.34
6.81 1.65 diff b/w CG of pile to CG of stem= 0 HFL 100.923m
GL 98.703m
1.00
FTL 98.203m
1.50 1.50
96.703m
1.65 1.65
Scour level 97.823
20.000
4.30
FL 76.703m
138
4.30
10.300
10.30
Distance between bearing c/l and shaft c/l in longitudinal dirn. = 0.00 m
C/l of bearing is to the left of c/l of shaft
Seismic mass of substructure = 117.06 ton
1.7 Partial Safety Factors (As per Annex B of IRC:6-2010)
Also refer latest amendment, notification no 78, dated 28th July 2012
Partial safety factor for relevant loads are presented here
For Loads
Ultimate Limit State (For Verification of Equilibrium) (Table 3.1, Annex B, IRC:6-2010)
Basic Comb Seismic Comb
Load Overturning Overturning
Resisting Resisting
or Sliding or Sliding
Dead Load 1.05 0.95 1.05 0.95
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.05 0.95 1.05 0.95
SIDL (surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35 1.00
Live load and associated loads
1.5 0 - -
(Leading)
1.15 0 0.2 0
(Accompanying)
Water Current - 0 1.0 -
Buoyancy 1.0 - 1.0 -
Earth Pressure 1.5 - 1.0 -
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0 - -
Thermal Load (Leading) 1.5 0 - -
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 0.9 0 0.5 0
Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5 -
Seismic Effect (During
- - 0.75 -
construction)
Ultimate Limit State (For Verification of Structural Strength) (Table 3.2, Annex B, IRC:6-2010)
Seismic
Load Basic Comb
Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1.35
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1.35
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1.75
1.5 0.2 0.0
(Leading)
1.15 0.2
(Accompanying)
Water Current 1 1
Buoyancy 0.15 0.15
Earth Pressure 1.5 1.5
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 0.2
Seismic Effect (During service) - 1.5
- 0.75
construction)
139
Serviceability Limit State
Quasi-
Load Rare Comb permanent Frequent
Comb
Dead Load 1 1 1
SIDL (except surfacing) 1 1 1
SIDL (surfacing) 1.2 1 1.2 (adding/for releiving 1.0 IRC 6, 2014, factor is 1.0)
1 0 0.75
(Leading)
0.75 0 0.2
(Accompanying)
Earth Pressure 1.0 1.0 1.0
Live Load Surcharge 0.8 0 0
Water Current 1.0 - 1.0
Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 0.15
Thermal Load (Leading) 1.0 - 0.6
Thermal Load (Accompanying) 0.6 0.5 0.5
Combination for Base Pressure and Design of Foundation (Table 3.4, Annex B, IRC:6-2010)
Seismic
Load Comb 1 Comb 2
Comb
Dead Load 1.35 1 1.35
SIDL (except surfacing) 1.35 1 1.35
SIDL (surfacing) 1.75 1 1.75
1.5 1.3 0.2 0.0
(Leading)
1.15 1 0.2
(Accompanying)
Water Current 1 1 1 or 0.0
Buoyancy (Base Pressure) 1 1 1 applicable for pile foundation
Buoyancy (Structural Design) 0.15 0.15 0.15

Earth Pressure 1.5 1.3 1
Live Load Surcharge 1.2 1 0.2
Thermal load 0.9 0.8 0.5
Seismic Effect (During service) - - 1.5

- - 0.75
construction)
For Materials
Seismic
Material Basic Comb
Comb
Concrete 1.5 1.5
Reinforcing steel 1.15 1.15
140
1.8 Load Data
Dead Load
Total weight of superstructure = 200 t
Transverse eccentricity of DL from c/l of abutment = 0.00 m
SIDL
Excluding wearing course
Self weight of crash barrier = 1 t/m
Self weight of railing = 0 t/m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (with bothside footpath case) = 0.00 m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier (with right side footpath case) = 0.00 m
Total weight of footpath/services 0.00 t
Wearing course
2
Load intensity due to wearing course = 0.22 t/m
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course (with both side footpath case) = 0 m
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course (with right side footpath only case) = 0.00 m
FPLL
2
Maximum intensity of footpath live load = 0 kg/m Cl. 206.1, IRC:6-2010
Live Load
% Reduction (in case of two lanes) = 0 % (Cl.205, IRC 6 2010)
Fraction of live load remaining in seismic case = 1
1 Lane 70R-Wheeled
Load = 100 t
Length of Load = 13.4 m
CG of load = 5.12 m
1 Lane Class A
Load = 55.4 t
Length of Load = 18.8 m
141
1.9 Bearing Data
Type of bearing = Elastomeric
Elastomeric Bearing :
1.10 Clear Cover
Dirt Wall = 40 mm
Abutment Cap = 40 mm
Abutment Stem = 75 mm
Foundation = 75 mm
1.11
Seismic Zone = IV
Importance Factor = 1.2
= 1 Table 9 of amendment (october2014) to
Response Reduction Factor
Maximum temperature = 45 = 3 IRC: 6-2014
o
Temperature variation Minimum Temperature = 0 = 32.5 C
Condition of exposure = Moderate
Factor by which seismic force is increased for design of foundation = 1.35
1.12 Sign Convention
Horizontal forces away from earth side Positive

Horizontal forces towards earth side Negative
Downward force Positive

Upward force/uplift Negative
In the transverse direction

Eccentricity towards footpath side Positive
Eccentricity away from footpath side Negative
142
LOAD CALCULATION FROM SUPERSTRUCTURE
2 Load Calculation from Superstructure
2.1 Dead Load of Superstructure
Total weight of superstructure = 200 t

Reaction = 100 t
Total reaction on abutment = 100 t

Longitudinal moment = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of DL from c/l of abutment = 0.00 m

Transverse Moment = 0 t-m
2.2 SIDL (crash barrier, railing, footpath) - excluding wearing course

Crash barrier weight = 40 t
Railing weight = 0 t
Footpath/services weight = 0.00 t
Total reaction on abutment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 20.0 t
Longitudinal moment (crash barrier) = 0 t-m
Total Longitudinal Moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier = 0.00 m

Transverse Moment (crash barrier) = 0 t-m
Total transverse moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0.00 t-m
Footpath only in Right side Case

Crash barrier weight = 0 t
Railing weight = 0 t
Footpath/services weight = 0.00 t
Total reaction on abutment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0.000 t
Longitudinal moment (crash barrier) = 0 t-m

Longitudinal moment (railing) = 0 t-m
Longitudinal moment (footpath/services) = 0 t-m
Total Longitudinal Moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of crash barrier = 0.00 m

Transverse Moment (crash barrier) = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of railing = 4.20 m

Transverse Moment (railing) = 0.00 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of footpath/services = 4.20 m

Transverse Moment (footpath/services) = 0 t-m
Total transverse moment (SIDL excluding w/c) = 0.00 t-m
143
2.3 SIDL (wearing course)
2
Load intensity due to wearing course = 0.22 t/m
DL of wearing course = 33 t
Total reaction on abutment = 16.5 t
Longitudinal moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m
Footpath only in Right side Case

2
Load intensity due to wearing course = 0 t/m
DL of wearing course = 0 t
Total reaction on abutment = 0 t
Longitudinal moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m
Transverse eccentricity of wearing course = 0m

Transverse Moment (wearing course) = 0 t-m
2.4 Summary of Loads from Superstructure

With Footpath Case
At Bearing Level
P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 100 0 0 0 0
SIDL (excluding w/c) 20.0 0 0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) 16.5 0 0 0 0
At Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

P ML MT HL HT
Load Item
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 100 0 0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) 16.5 0 0 0 0
At Foundation Bottom Level

MT(about
P ML HL HT
Load Item footing c/l)
t t-m t-m t-m t-m
DL 100 0 0 0 0
SIDL (w/c) 16.5 0 0 0 0
144
SEISMIC COEFFICIENT CALCULATION :
3 Seismic Coefficient Calculation
T = Fundamental Period = 2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
D = Appropriate Dead Load of the Superstructure = 2329.50 KN

and Live Load in KN
F = Horizontal Force in KN required to be applied at the centre of the mass of the

superstructure for 1mm horizontal deflection at the top of the pier along the
considered direction of horizontal Force
Horizontal Force in Longitudinal Direction applied = 10 KN
L = Height of the Abutment above fixity Level including = 3.670 m

abutment cap
G = Grade of Concrete for Abutment = M30
E = Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete = 31000.0 Mpa
= 3.16E+06 t/m^2
b = width/dia of abutment shaft = 8.400 m
d = depth of abutment shaft = 1.000 m
ILL = Moment of Inertia about longitudinal axis = 0.525 m4
ITT = Moment of Inertia about transverse axis = 37.044 m4
b = Breadth of the elastomeric Bearing = 320 mm
heff = Thickness of the elastomeric bearing = 60 mm
A = Effective area of elastomeric bearing = 150304 mm2
G = Shear Modulus = 1.0 Mpa
Vr = Shear Rating of Bearing (per bearing) G*A/heff = 2.51 KN/mm
n = No. of Bearing over abutment = 6
Deflection at the top of the abutment (for longitudinal direction)
F = Horizontal Force in KN reqd. for 1 mm = 1007.50 KN

deflection
T = Fundamental Time Period = 0.096 sec

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 2.50

(depending upon fundamental time period T)
145
Deflection at the top of the abutment (for transverse direction)
d1 = Deflection due to shear rating of bearing = 0.665318 mm
d2 = FL3/3EI = 0.000141 mm
d = Total deflection of pier at top = 0.00014 mm
F = Horizontal Force in KN reqd. for 1 mm = 71089.07 KN

deflection
T = Fundamental Time Period = 0.096 sec

2.0*sqrt(D/1000F)
Sa/g = Average response acceleration coefficient = 2.50

(depending upon fundamental time period T)
The project stretch is in seismic zone IV
Type of Soil Medium Soil
Z = Zone factor = 0.24
I = Importance factor = 1.2
R = Response reduction factor Long = 3

Transverse = 1
A h long = Horizontal Seismic Coefficient = 0.120

(Z/2)*(S a /g)/(R/I) say 0.120
A h trans = Vertical Seismic Coefficient (Clause 222.3 of latest amendments) = 0.360

2/3 * A h say 0.360
A v = Vertical Seismic Coefficient (Clause 222.3 of latest amendments) = 0.240

2/3 * A h say 0.240
146
CALCULATION OF ACTIVE & PASSIVE EARTH PRESSURE COEFFECIENTS
4 Earth Pressure Coefficient Calculation
alpha (a) 90.0 1.57

Beta (b) 0.00 0.00
delta (d) 20.0 0.35
phi(p) 30.0 0.52
Sin(a+p) 0.866025 sin(a-p) 0.866025

Sin(a) 1 sin(a) 1
sin(a-d) 0.939693 sin(a+d) 0.939693
sin(p+d) 0.766044 sin(p+d) 0.766044

sin(p-b) 0.5 sin(p+b) 0.5
sin(a-b) 1 sin(a+b) 1
ka 0.297 kp 6.105
Kah 0.279 Kph 5.738

Kav 0.102 Kpv 2.088
Earth Pressure Coefficient in Seismic Case
Case-1 (By taking l = tan -1 ( a h/(1+ a v)) )

Active earth pressure coefficient,Ca =
(1+av)*cos(f-l-a) 1 2
X
cosl*cos2a*cos(d+a+l) 1+ sin(f+d)*sin(f-i-l) 0.5
cos(a-i)*cos(d+a+l)
ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.120

av = Vertical seismic coefficient = 0.240
f = angle of internal friction = 30 deg
l = tan-1(ah/(1+av)) = 5.53 deg
a = angle which earth face of wall makes with vertical = 0 deg
I = slope of earthfill = 0 deg
d = angle of friction between wall and earthfill = 20 deg
Case-2 (By taking l = tan -1 ( a h/(1- a v)) )

Active earth pressure coefficient,Ca =
(1-av)*cos(f-l-a) 1 2
X
cosl*cos2a*cos(d+a+l) 1+ sin(f+d)*sin(f-i-l) 0.5
cos(a-i)*cos(d+a+l)
= 0.766 x 0.411
Ca = 0.315
ah = Horizontal seismic coefficient = 0.120

av = Vertical seismic coefficient (0.5ah) = 0.240
f = angle of internal friction = 30 deg
l = tan-1(ah/(1-av)) = 8.97 deg
a = angle which earth face of wall makes with vertical = 0 deg
I = slope of earthfill = 0 deg
d = angle of friction between wall and earthfill = 20.0 deg
Horz. Active earth pressure coeff. in seismic case is taken as,Ca*cos20 0.423
Vert. Active earth pressure coeff. in seismic case is taken as,Ca*cos20 0.154
Dynamic Increment (Horz.) 0.144

Dynamic Increment (Vert.) 0.052
147
SHEAR RATING
5 Shear Rating
Bearing type is Elastomeric
Effective area of elastomeric bearing A = 150304 mm2
Shear Rating of Bearing (per bearing) G*A/heff 2505.07 KN/m
No. of Bearing over pier on support line on one side n = 6
Shear Rating of bearings on one side Vr = 15030.4 kN/m

o
Temperature variation = 32.5 C
Thermal strain in superstructure = 3.9E-04
Shrinkage strain = 2.0E-04
Total strain = 5.9E-04
Movement of deck above bearing (right span) ltc = 5.9E-03 m
Horizontal force due to shear rating (rightspan) Vr*ltc = 8.9 t
Total horizontal force on pier at bearing level = 9.8 t
Co efficient of friction at the movable bearing Teflon on stainless steel 0.03 For negative friction
0.05 For positive friction
Case 1 Seismic Case Fh-µ(Rg+Rq)
Case 2 Other than Seismic case Fh/2+µ(Rg+Rq)
Service Condition
At Bearing Level
ML MT HL HT
t-m t-m t t
Shear Rating 0 0 0.0 0
0.05*(100+0+16.5+76.36*0.2
ML MT HL HT
t-m t-m t t
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0
At Foundation Bottom Level

MT(about
ML HL HT
Load Item footing c/l)
t-m t-m t-m t-m
Shear Rating 0.0 0 0.0 0
148
LIVE LOAD CALCULATION (NORMAL CASE)
6 Live Load Calculation
Following live load cases are considered

1 1 lane 70R-Wheeled
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
4 1 lane 70R-Wheeled + 1 Lane Class A
Reaction due to DL of superstructure = 100 t

Reaction due to SIDL exl w/c = 0.00 t
Reaction due to SIDL due to w/c = 16.50 t
Transverse moment has been calculated for the most eccentric placement of live load
Bearing type is Elastomeric
CG of 100 t
13.4
5.124
a b
0.75 18.50 0.75
20
Live Load Reactions

Ra = 100.0*(20.0-5.1-0.8)/18.5 = 76.4 t
Rb = 100.0-76.4 = 23.6 t
Vertical Reaction on abutment = 76.4 t

Braking force = 20% of 100.00 t
= 20.0 t acts at 1.2 m above road surface
Change in Reaction due to braking force = 3.1 t
Maximum Vertical force on abutment = 79.4 t

Minimum Vertical force on abutment = 73.3 t
Longitudinal moment = 0.0 t-m
Total horizontal force at bearing level = Fh/2

= 10.0 t
Total Horizontal force (Longitudinal) HL = 10.0 t
Total Horizontal force (Transverse) HT = 0.0 t
79.4 t
C/L of deck
8.4 m
Eccentricity = 1.155 m
Transverse Moment MT = 91.7 t-m
149
2 1 lane Class A
CG of 55.4 t
18.8
9.091
a b
0.75 18.50 0.75
20
Live Load Reactions

Ra = 55.4*(20.0-9.1-0.8)/18.5 = 25.0 t
Rb = 55.4-25.0 = 30.4 t
Vertical Reaction on abutment = 24.98 t

Braking force = 20% of 55.40 t
= 11.1 t acts at 1.2 m above road surface
Change in Reaction due to braking force = 1.7 t
Maximum Vertical force on abutment = 26.7 t

Minimum Vertical force on abutment = 23.3 t
Total horizontal force at bearing level = Fh/2

= 5.5 t
Total Horizontal force (Longitudinal) HL = 5.5 t
Total Horizontal force (Transverse) HT = 0.0 t
26.7 t
C/L of deck
8.4 m
Eccentricity = 2.45 m
Transverse Moment MT = 65.4 t-m
150
Summary
Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case
t t t-m t-m t t
1 lane 70R-W 79.4 73.3 0.0 91.7 10.0 0.0
1 lane Class A 26.7 23.3 0.0 65.4 5.5 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 Maximum Reaction Case

LL2 Maximum Moment Case
At Bearing Level
t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 0.0 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 0.0 91.7 10.0 0.0

t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
0+10*(101.873-98.203)
At Pile Cap Bottom Level
MT(about
footing
Pmax Pmin ML c/l) HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
For Seismic Case

Fraction of Live Load Remaining on span in seismic case = 1
At Bearing Level
t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 0.0 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 0.0 91.7 10.0 0.0

t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
0+10*(101.873-98.203)
At Pile Cap Bottom Level
MT(about
footing
Pmax Pmin ML c/l) HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
LL1 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
LL2 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
151
7.0 Seismic Load from Superstructure (Seismic Case)
Following live load cases are considered
2 1 Lane Class A
3 3 Lane Class A
4 1 lane 70R-Wheeled + 1 Lane Class A
Reactions from grillage analysis (ref. 1.7 bearing load data)
Load type Reaction from left span * Reaction from right span RL * Left span
(t ) (t ) is not
Superstr. Dead Load (Girder) 0 48 102.965 present in
Superstr. Dead Load (Slab) 0 53 103.338 abutment
SIDL (exl. w/c) 0 0 103.821 case and the
SIDL (w/c) 0 0 103.481 existing
span is
treated as
Right Span.
LL 70R 100.0 104.713
LL CLA 55.4 104.713
Reaction from DL of superstr. (right span) = 100 t
Reaction from SIDL (right span) = 0 t
Reaction from DL of superstr. (left span) = 0 t
Reaction from SIDL (left span) = 0 t
Horizontal seismic coefficient (long.) ahl = 0.120 = 0.120
Service Service
Horizontal seismic coefficient (trans.) aht = 0.360 = 0.360
condition condition
Vertical seismic coefficient av = 0.240 = 0.240
Only 20% of live load given in above table is considered in seismic force calculations.
r1 = Full seismic force in longitudinal direction = ahl*(DL+SIDL)
r2 = Full seismic force in transverse direction = aht*(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
r3 = Full seismic force in vertical direction = av *(DL+SIDL+Appropriate LL)
7.2 One Span Loaded (end span loaded case)

Eccentricity of bearing for one span loaded case = 0.00 m
7.2.a 1 lane 70R-Wheeled
Load on left span = 0 t

Load on right span = 20.0 t
Live Load Reactions
Reaction from left span * = 0.0 t
Ra =100.0×0.2 = 20.0 t
Full Design Seismic Forces

From Left Span From Right Span
r1 = 0.00 t r1 = 12.00 t
r2 = 0.00 t r2 = 43.20 t
r3 = 0.00 t r3 = 28.80 t
RL of Cg of Transverse Seismic force = 103.42 m
7.2.a.1 Longitudinal Seismic Case
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From left span) = r1 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in transverse direction (From left span) = 0.3r2 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From right span) = r1 = 12.0 t
Seismic force in transverse direction (From right span) = 0.3r2 = 13.0 t
Seismic force at bearing level (Longitudinal) = 12.0 t

Seismic force at bearing level (Transverse) = 13.0 t
HL Seismic = 12.0 t
HT Seismic = 13.0 t
152
7.2.a.2 Transverse Seismic Case
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From left span) = 0.3r1 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in transverse direction (From left span) = r2 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From right span) = 0.3r1 = 3.6 t
Seismic force in transverse direction (From right span) = r2 = 43.2 t

HL Seismic = 7.2 t
HT Seismic = 43.2 t
Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = 0.3*(r3 from left span + r3 from right span) = 8.6 t
Transverse moment = 1.3 t-m
7.2.a.3 Vertical Seismic Case


HL Seismic = 7.2 t
HT Seismic = 13.0 t
Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = (r3 from left span + r3 from right span) = 28.8 t
Transverse Eccentrity of CWLL

15.9 t
3.05 m 1.16 m C/L of deck
8.4 m
7.2.b 1 lane Class A
Reaction from left span * = 0.0 t

Ra =+55×0.2 = 11.1 t
Full Design Seismic Forces

From Left Span From Right Span
r1 = 0.00 t r1 = 12.00 t
r2 = 0.00 t r2 = 39.99 t
r3 = 0.00 t r3 = 26.66 t
RL of Cg of Transverse Seismic force = 103.316 m
7.2.b.1 Longitudinal Seismic Case
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From left span) = r1 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in longitudinal direction (From right span) = r1 = 12.0 t

HL Seismic = 12.0 t
HT Seismic = 12.0 t
153
7.2.b.2 Transverse Seismic Case
Seismic force in transverse direction (From left span) = r2 = 0.0 t
Seismic force in transverse direction (From right span) = r2 = 40.0 t

HL Seismic = 7.2 t
HT Seismic = 40.0 t
Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = 0.3*(r3 from left span + r3 from right span) = 8.0 t
7.2.b.3 Vertical Seismic Case


HL Seismic = 7.2 t
HT Seismic = 12.0 t
Vertical Seismic force at bearing level = (r3 from left span + r3 from right span) = 26.7 t
Transverse Eccentrity of CWLL

5.3 t
1.75 m 2.45 m C/L of deck
8.4 m
154
Final Summary of seismic forces from superstructure
SL1 Seismic force on superstructure corrresponding to LL1

SL2 Seismic force on superstructure corrresponding to LL2
Bearing level
Longitudinal Seismic
Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT RL of HT
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 19.7 23.1 12.0 14.0 103.52
SL2 7.2 -7.2 15.5 16.2 12.0 10.8 103.16
12.00*(103.52-101.873)
Transverse Seismic 14.0*(103.518-101.873)+-0.029
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 11.8 76.9 7.2 46.8 103.52
SL2 7.2 -7.2 9.3 48.7 7.2 36.0 103.16
7.20*(103.518-101.873)
Vertical Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 31.2 -31.2 11.8 23.0 7.2 14.0 103.52
SL2 24.0 -24.0 9.3 21.6 7.2 10.8 103.16
Abutment bottom level

t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 44.0 74.5 12.0 14.0 101.9
SL2 7.2 -7.2 44.0 55.8 12.0 10.8 101.9
12.00*(101.87-98.203)
Transverse Seismic 14.03*(101.873-98.203)+23.06
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 26.4 248.6 7.2 46.8 101.9
SL2 7.2 -7.2 26.4 180.8 7.2 36.0 101.9
Vertical Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 31.2 -31.2 26.4 74.5 7.2 14.0 101.9
SL2 24.0 -24.0 26.4 61.2 7.2 10.8 101.9
155
Footing bottom level
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 62.0 95.6 12.0 14.0 101.9
SL2 7.2 -7.2 62.0 72.0 12.0 10.8 101.9
12*(101.873-96.703
Transverse Seismic 14.031*(101.873-96.703)+23.06
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 9.4 -9.4 37.2 318.7 7.2 46.8 101.9
SL2 7.2 -7.2 37.2 234.8 7.2 36.0 101.9
7.2*(101.873-96.703
Vertical Seismic 46.8*(101.873-96.703)+76.919
t t t-m t-m t t m
SL1 31.2 -31.2 37.2 95.5 7.2 14.0 101.9
SL2 24.0 -24.0 37.2 77.4 7.2 10.8 101.9
156
CALCULATION OF FORCES DUE TO EARTH PRESSURE
9 Calculation of Forces due to Earth Pressure
Provision of weep holes in abutment wall Yes No hydrostatic force needs to be applied
LWL CASE
Dirt Wall Top Lvl

103.513m
101.57-0.4-0.4-0.5
Screen Wall bottom lvl
100.270m
6.81
3.80
12.94
161.74 FTL 98.203m
FL 96.703m
Live Load Surcharge Earth Pressure
HFL CASE
Dirt Wall Top Lvl

103.513m
Screen Wall bottom lvl

100.270m E1
HFL 100.923m
E2
E4 E3
FTL 98.203m
FL 96.703m
Live Load Surcharge Zero Hydrostatic Pressure Earth Pressure
157
Horizontal force due to earth pressure on abutment acts in L-L direction
Width of abutment (Skew) b = 8.4 m

Width of abutment stem (Skew) b' = 8.4 m
% of earth pressure increament as per 710.4.3 of IRC : 78-2014 = 0 %
Horizontal Earth Pressure Coefficient Kah = 0.279
Horizontal Earth Pressure Coefficient Kav = 0.102
Dynamic Increment (Horz.) = 0.144
Dynamic Increment (Vert.) = 0.052
Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

Normal Case
LWL
Horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 0.5*kah*γ*H2*b 11.64504 145.563
= 66.1 t for shaft
Lever arm from abutment shaft bottom = 0.42*H
= 2.23 m
ML = 147.4 t-m
1.5
HFL
Horizontal force
E1 = 15.7 t 0.5*0.279*2*(103.513-100.27)^2*8.4+0.5*2*0.279*((103.513-100.27)+(103.513-100.923))*(100.27-100.923)*8.4
Lever arm from abutment shaft bottom = 3.81 m 100.923-98.203+0.42*(103.513-100.923)
E2 = 33.0 t 0.279*2*(103.513-100.923)*(100.923-98.203)*8.4
Lever arm from abutment shaft bottom = 1.36 m
E3 = 8.7 t
Lever arm from abutment shaft bottom = 1.1424 m
E4 = 0.0 t
Lever arm from abutment shaft bottom = 0 m
Total horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 57.4 t

ML = 114.7 t-m
Sesimic Case
LWL
Horizontal Force
Static Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm
Component Increment
t m t m
66.1 1.77 34.2 2.655
0.5*0.144*2*(103.513-98.203)^2*8.4
ML = 207.8 t-m
158
HFL
Horizontal Force
Static Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm
Component Increment
t m t m
E1 15.7 3.8078 8.1 4.015
E2 33.0 1.36 17.1 1.36
E3 8.7 1.1424 4.5 1.36
E4 0.0 0 0 0

ML = 176.7 t-m
Summary of forces at Abutment Shaft bottom level
Normal Case
ML due to
HL
HL
t t-m
LWL 66.1 147.4
HFL 57.4 114.7
Seismic Case
ML due to
HL
HL
t t-m
LWL 100.3 207.8
HFL 87.1 176.7
Foundation Bottom Level

Normal Case
LWL
Horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 0.5*kah*γ*H2*b Vertical Force = 0.5*kav*γ*H2*b
= 108.7 t Lever arm from toe
Lever arm from foundation bottom = 0.42*H ML
= 2.86 m
ML = 310.9 t-m
HFL
Horizontal force Vertical force
E1 = 15.7 t 87.8 E1
Lever arm from foundation bottom = 5.31 m Lever arm from toe
E2 = 51.2 t E2
E3 = 20.9 t E3
E4 = 0.0 t
Lever arm from foundation bottom = 0 m
Total horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 87.8 t Vertical force

ML = 228.5 t-m ML
Sesimic Case
LWL
Horizontal Force Vertical Force
159
Static
Static Dynamic Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm Componen Lever arm
Component Increment Increment
t
t m t m t m t
108.7 2.27 56.3 3.405 39.6 4.30 20.4
Total horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 165.0 t Total Vertical force

ML = 438.4 t-m ML
HFL
Horizontal Force Vertical Force
Static
Static Dynamic Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm Componen Lever arm
Component Increment Increment
t
t m t m t m t
E1 15.7 5.308 8.1 5.515 E1 5.7 4.30 3.0
E2 51.2 2.110 26.5 2.11 E2 18.7 4.30 9.6
E3 20.9 1.772 10.8 2.11 E3 7.6 4.30 3.9
E4 0.0 0 0 0
Total horizontal force in long. Dirn. = 133.3 t Total Vertical force

ML = 352.2 t-m ML
Summary of forces at Foundation bottom level
Normal Case
ML due to
P HL
HL
t t t-m
LWL 39.6 108.7 310.9
HFL 32.0 87.8 228.5
Seismic Case
ML due to
P HL
HL
t t t-m
LWL 60.0 165.0 438.4
HFL 48.5 133.3 352.2
Live Load Surcharge
Abutment Shaft Bottom Level

Normal Case
Horizontal force = 29.9 t
Lever arm = 2.655 m
ML = 79.30 t-m
160
Seismic Case
Horizontal force
Static Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm
Component Increment
t m t m
29.9 2.66 15.5 2.66

ML = 120.4 t-m
Summary of forces due to Live Load Surcharge at Abutment Shaft bottom level
Normal Case
ML due to
HL
HL
t t-m
LWL 29.9 79.3
HFL 29.9 79.3
Seismic Case
ML due to
HL
HL
t t-m
LWL 45.3 120.4
HFL 45.3 120.4
Foundation Bottom Level

Normal Case 0.279*1.2*2*(103.513-100.27)*8.4+0.279*1.2*2*(100.27-98.203)*8.4+0.279*1.2*2*(98.203-96.703)*8.4
Horizontal force = 38.3 t
Lever arm = 3.4 m
ML = 130.42 t-m
Seismic Case
Horizontal force
Static Dynamic
Lever arm Lever arm
Component Increment
t m t m
38.3 3.41 19.8 3.41

ML = 198.0 t-m
Summary of forces due to Live Load Surcharge at foundation bottom level
Normal Case
ML due to
P HL
HL
t t t-m
LWL 0.0 38.3 130.4
HFL 0.0 38.3 130.4
Seismic Case
ML due to
P HL
HL
t t t-m
LWL 0.0 58.1 198.0
HFL 0.0 58.1 198.0
161
CALCULATION OF FORCES ON ABUTMENT AND FOUNDATION
10 Calculation of Forces on Abutment and Foundation
Abutment dimensions (square) are shown below
0.75 0.4 1.12
0.00 1.94
1.670 0.40 2.59
c 1.00 0.40
1.01
a
b
HFL
2.57
101.57-98.203-0.4-0.4
1.65
2.72
100.923-98.203
1.00
0.00 d
1.50
1.50
1.65 1.65
4.30
Width of abutment (Skew) b = 8.40 m

Width of abutment stem (Skew) b' = 8.40 m
% of earth pressure increament as per 710.4.3 of IRC : 78-2014 = 0 %
Return Wall is on 2 side
Horizontal distance of CG of abutment shaft from vertical face = 0.50 m
Horizontal distance of CG of abutment shaft from vertical face 0 m
Normal Case
Horizontal Lever ML (about

Horizontal Lever arm
Component Weight ML arm from pile pile cap
from bearing c/l
cap c/l c/l)
t m t-m t-m
Dirt Wall Bracket 2.84 1.653 4.7 2.803 7.9
Dirt Wall 16.3 1.320 21.5 1.320 21.5
Abutment Cap 25.2 0.685 17.3 0.685 17.3
Abutment Shaft 53.9 0.010 0.5 0.010 0.5
Return Wall 16.9 1.785 30.2 1.785 30.2
Total 115.2 0.64 74.3 77.6
Hor. eccentricity of weight of substructure from c/l of bearing = 0.64 m
Width of abutment shaft at HFL = 1.0 m
162
3
Volume of abutment shaft submerged in water = 22.8 m 0.5*(1+1)*2.720*8.400*1
Buoyancy on abutment shaft = -22.85 t
Seismic Case
Weight Full Design Seismic Forces
Component
t r1 r2 r3 0.24
Dirt Wall Bracket 2.8 0.3 0.3 0.7
Dirt Wall 16.3 2.0 2.0 3.9
Abutment Cap 25.2 3.0 3.0 6.1
Abutment Shaft 53.9 6.5 6.5 12.9
Return wall 16.9 2.0 2.0 4.1
Back fill 93.9 11.3 11.3 22.5
θ is skew angle
Vert.
HL
HT Hor.Lever Arm Lever Arm
(r1*cosθ+0.3r2* V (0.3r3) ML due to HL ML due to V MT
Component (r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ) from bearing c/l from shaft
sinθ)
bottom
t t t m m t-m t-m t-m

Dirt Wall Bracket 0.3 0.1 0.2 1.65 5.3 1.8 0.3 0.5
Dirt Wall 2.0 0.6 1.2 1.32 4.3 8.5 1.6 2.5
Abutment Cap 3.0 0.9 1.8 0.69 3.0 9.0 1.2 2.7
Abutment Shaft 6.5 1.9 3.9 0.01 1.3 8.3 0.0 2.5
Return wall 2.0 0.6 1.2 1.79 5.3 10.8 2.2 3.2
Back fill 11.3 3.4 6.8 1.33 2.7 29.9 9.0 9.0
Total 25.1 7.5 15.1 68.3 14.3 20.5
Vert. Lever Arm

ML due to HL at pile cap
from foundation MT ML due to V
Component bottom
bottom
m t-m t-m t-m
Dirt Wall 5.8 11.4 3.4 6.9
Abutment Cap 4.5 13.5 4.1 8.1
Return wall 6.8 13.8 4.2 8.3
Back fill 4.2 46.8 14.1 28.1
Total 106.0 31.8 63.6
163
Transverse Seismic
Vert.
HL
HT Hor.Lever Arm Lever Arm
(0.3r1*cosθ+r2* V (0.3r3) ML due to HL ML due to V MT
Component (0.3r1*sinθ+r2*cosθ) from bearing c/l from shaft
sinθ)
bottom
Dirt Wall 0.6 2.0 1.2 1.32 4.3 2.5 1.6 8.5
Abutment Cap 0.9 3.0 1.8 0.69 3.0 2.7 1.2 9.0
Abutment Shaft 1.9 6.5 3.9 0.01 1.3 2.5 0.0 8.3
Return wall 0.6 2.0 1.2 1.79 3.4 2.1 2.2 6.9
Back fill 3.4 11.3 6.8 1.33 2.66 9.0 9.0 29.9
Total 7.5 25.1 15.1 19.3 14.3 64.4
Vert. Lever Arm

Component bottom
bottom
m t-m t-m t-m
Dirt Wall 5.8 3.4 11.4 6.9
Abutment Cap 4.5 4.1 13.5 8.1
Return wall 6.8 4.2 13.8 8.3
Back fill 4.2 14.1 46.8 28.1
Total 31.8 106.0 63.6
Vertical Seismic
Vert.
HL HT
Hor.Lever Arm Lever Arm
(0.3r1*cosθ+0.3 (0.3r1*sinθ+0.3r2*cosθ V (r3) ML due to HL ML due to V MT
Component from bearing c/l from shaft
r2*sinθ) )
bottom
Dirt Wall 0.6 0.6 3.9 1.32 4.3 2.5 5.2 2.5
Abutment Cap 0.9 0.9 6.1 0.69 3.0 2.7 4.1 2.7
Abutment Shaft 1.9 1.9 12.9 0.01 1.3 2.5 0.1 2.5
Return wall 0.6 0.6 4.1 1.79 3.4 2.1 7.3 2.1
Back fill 3.4 3.4 22.5 1.33 2.66 9.0 29.9 9.0
Total 7.5 7.5 50.2 19.3 47.7 19.3
Vert. Lever Arm

Component bottom
bottom
m t-m t-m t-m
Dirt Wall 5.8 3.4 3.4 22.9
Abutment Cap 4.5 4.1 4.1 27.1
Return wall 6.8 4.2 4.2 27.7
Back fill 4.2 14.1 14.1 93.7
Total 31.8 31.8 211.9
164
Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level
Normal Case
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0 0 0
HFL for eccentricity only
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0 0 0
Buoyancy -22.85 -22.85 0 0 0 0
for eccentricity only
Seismic Case
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 54.0 20.5 25.1 7.5
Substr.
HFL 68.32-14.31 (separate out backfill for load factor in seismic)
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 54.0 20.5 25.1 7.5
Substr.
Transverse Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1
Substr.
Vertical Seismic
LWL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5
Substr.
HFL
Component
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5
Substr.
End of Summary of Forces at Abutment Shaft Bottom Level
Calculation of Weight of foundation

Rectangular Part
3
Volume = 66.435 m
Weight = 166.0875 t
Trapezoidal Part
3
Volume = 0.0 m
Weight = 0 t
3
Total Volume of foundation = 66.435 m
Total Weight of foundation = 166.0875 t
Buoyancy force on foundation = -66.435 t
Lever arm from toe 4.3/2 = 2.15 m

Moment due to wt. Of foundation about toe = 357.1 t-m
Moment due to buoyancy force on foundation about toe ML = -142.8 t-m
165
Calculation for Return Wall
Vertical Lever
Horizontal Lever Arm ML about c/l
Weight Arm from c/l of
Portion from c/l of shaft of shaft
shaft
t m t-m m
Rectangular 9.96 1.90 18.9 0.00 0.75*(2.59+2.720)*0.5*2.5*2
Triangular 6.99 1.63 11.4 0.00
Total 16.9 30.2
Horizontal eccentricity of CG of return wall from toe in longitudinal direction = 1.8 m

Vertical eccentricity of CG of return wall from FRL = 0.0 m
Horizontal eccentricity of return wall in transverse dirn. = 6 m
Transverse Moment due to wt. of return wall MT = 101.7 t-m
Submerged height of return wall in HFL case upto foundation top level = 0 m
Submerged volume of return wall = 0 m3
Buoyancy force on return wall = 0 t
Longitudinal moment due to buoyancy force on return wall = 0.0 t-m
Transverse moment due to buoyancy about centerline of footing = 0 t-m
Calculation for Backfill Weight

Width of backfill in transverse direction (Skew) = 7.4 m
8.4-2*0.5
LWL
Hor.Lever Arm from toe
Weight ML about toe
Portion in L-L dirn.
t m t-m
a 50.3 1.90 95.3 (1.65-1.01)*2.59*7.40*2+(1.65-1.01)*2.720*7.4*2
b 40.7 1.63 66.2 1.01*(2.567-2.720)*7.4*2*0+1.01*2.720*7.4*2
c 2.99 0.00 0.0 0.5*1.01*0.4*7.4*2
d 0.00 0.00 0.0
Total 93.9 161.5
HFL
Hor.Lever Arm from toe
Weight ML about toe
Portion in L-L dirn.
t m t-m
a 37.4 1.90 70.9 (1.65-1.01)*2.59*7.4*2.00+(1.65-1.01)*2.720*7.4*1
b 20.3 1.63 33.1
c 2.99 0.00 0.0
d 0.00 0.00 0.0
Total 60.7 104.0
Summary of Forces at Foundation Bottom Level
Normal Case
LWL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
Component (about toe)
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on
-22.85 -22.85 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -66.44 -66.44 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return wall.
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Case
LWL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 106.0 31.8 25.1 7.5
Substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL
166
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 106.0 31.8 25.1 7.5
Substr.
Buoyancy on
-22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -66.44 -66.44 0 0 0 0
Buoyancy on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return wall.
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Transverse Seismic
LWL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 31.8 106.0 7.5 25.1
Substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
15.1 -15.1 31.8 106.0 7.5 25.1
Substr.
Buoyancy on
-22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -66.44 -66.44 0 0 0 0
Buoyancy on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return wall.
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vertical Seismic
LWL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
50.2 -50.2 -180.2 211.9 7.5 7.5
Substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL
ML due to HL
Pmax Pmin MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
50.2 -50.2 -180.2 211.9 7.5 7.5
Substr.
Buoyancy on
-22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
substr.
Weight of fdn 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buoyancy on fdn. -66.435 -66.435 0 0 0 0
Buoyancy on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Return wall.
Backfill Wt. 93.9 93.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
End of Summary of Forces at Pile cap Bottom Level
Buyoyant forces in HFL case with full scouring
Highest Flood Level RL. 100.923

Abutment Base Level RL. 96.703 98.203
Length of submeged abutment height = 4.22 m 2.72
Pmax
Load Item
t
Substructure
Weight reduction -28.0 1*10.3*2.72*-1
Pile cap Weight
reduction -54.18 -8.4*4.3/COS(angle)*1.5*1-(MAX(0,(10.3*4.3/COS(angle)-1*10.3/COS(angle))*(97.823-98.203-1.5)))
167
11.LOAD COMBINATION (LIMIT STATE)
168
LOAD COMBINATION (LIMIT STATE)
Annex B, IRC:6-2010
Following Limit States are considered
A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of Equilibrium)

A-1 Basic Combination
A-2 Seismic Combination Not required in pile foundation
B Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)

B-2 Seismic Combination
C Serviceability Limit State

C-1 Rare Combination (For checking stress limits)
C-2 Quasi-permanent Combination (For checking crack width in RCC structures)
D Combination for Design of Foundation

D-1 Combination 1
D-2 Combination 2
D-3 Seismic Combination
169
11.A Ultimate Limit State (For verification of structural strength)
1 LWL
1.1 Maximum Reaction Case
1.2 Maximum Moment Case
2 HFL
2.1 Maximum Reaction Case
2.2 Maximum Moment Case
LWL and HFL caseCase
B-1.1 and B-2.1 Service Condition
Maximum Reaction case
Unfactored Forces Factored Forces
Partial
Load Item Safety Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Factor
t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding w/c) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.5 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 119.1 109.9 55.1 137.6 15.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1.15 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 91.3 84.3 42.2 105.5 11.5 0.0
FPLL1 1.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure LWL 1.5 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 221.1 0.0 99.1 0.0
Earth pressure HFL 1.5 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 172.0 0.0 86.1 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2 0.0 35.8 0.0
Substructure Weight 1.35 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 100.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Leading 406.3 397.1 422.5 137.6 137.0 0.0
Total forces at HFL Condition
LL Accompanying 378.5 371.4 409.7 105.5 133.5 0.0
LL Leading 409.7 400.5 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0
Total forces at LWL Condition
LL Accompanying 381.9 374.9 458.7 105.5 146.5 0.0
B-1.2 and B-2.2 Service Condition
Maximum Longitudinal Moment case
Partial Unactored Forces Factored Forces
Factor t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.9 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Leading) 1.5 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 119.1 109.9 55.1 137.6 15.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 1.15 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 91.3 84.3 42.2 105.5 11.5 0.0
FPLL2 1.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2 0.0 35.8 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.85 0 0 0 0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Leading 462.2 453.0 422.5 137.6 137.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 434.4 427.3 409.7 105.5 133.5 0.0
LL Leading 465.6 456.4 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 437.8 430.7 458.7 105.5 146.5 0.0
170
B-1.3 and B-2.3
Maximum Transverse Moment case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.9 28.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Leading) 1.5 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 119.1 109.9 55.1 137.6 15.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 1.15 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 91.3 84.3 42.2 105.5 11.5 0.0
FPLL2 1.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2 0.0 35.8 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Leading 462.2 453.0 422.5 137.6 137.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 434.4 427.3 409.7 105.5 133.5 0.0
LL Leading 465.6 456.4 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 437.8 430.7 458.7 105.5 146.5 0.0
B-1.4 and B-2.4

One Span Dislodged Condition

DL (Superstr.)
SIDL (excluding w/c)
SIDL (w/c)
LL1 (Leading)
LL1 (Accompanying)
FPLL1
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.2 0.0 35.8 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Leading 152.2 152.2 367.5 0.0 122.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 152.2 152.2 367.5 0.0 122.0 0.0
LL Leading 155.6 155.6 416.5 0.0 135.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 155.6 155.6 416.5 0.0 135.0 0.0
171
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR BASIC COMBINATION
HFL Condition
Live LL Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No. load Leading/Accom
t t t-m t-m t t
case panying
BC1 LL1 LL Leading 406.3 397.1 422.5 137.6 137.0 0.0 Maximum reaction case
BC2 case LL Accompanying378.5 371.4 409.7 105.5 133.5 0.0
BC3 LL2 LL Leading 462.2 453.0 422.5 137.6 137.0 0.0 Maximum longitudinal moment case
BC5 LL2 LL Leading 465.6 456.4 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0 Maximum transverse moment case
LL Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No. Leading/Accom
panying t t t-m t-m t t
BC7 LL Leading 152.2 152.2 367.5 0.0 122.0 0.0 only substructure has been cast
BC8 LL Accompanying152.2 152.2 367.5 0.0 122.0 0.0
LWL Condition
Load Case No. load Leading/Accom
t t t-m t-m t t
case panying
BC1 LL1 LL Leading 409.7 400.5 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0 Maximum reaction case
BC3 LL2 LL Leading 465.6 456.4 471.6 137.6 150.0 0.0 Maximum longitudinal moment case
Load Case No. Leading/Accom
panying t t t-m t-m t t
BC7 LL Leading 155.6 155.6 416.5 0.0 135.0 0.0 only substructure has been cast
BC8 LL Accompanying155.6 155.6 416.5 0.0 135.0 0.0
172
11.A-2 Seismic Combination
Abutment Bottom Level
A-2.1 Service Condition
Longitudinal Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 9.354 -9.354 44.04 74.55 12 14.03 14.0 -14.0 66.1 111.8 18.0 21.0
Superstr.
Earth pressure LWL 0.0 0.0 207.8 0.0 100.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 311.7 0.0 150.5 0.0
1.5
Earth pressure HFL 0.0 0.0 176.7 0.0 87.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 265.1 0.0 130.7 0.0
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.1 -15.1 54.0 20.5 25.1 7.5 22.6 -22.6 81.0 30.7 37.7 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total forces at HFL Condition 339.7 265.2 543.9 160.9 197.4 32.3
Total forces at LWL Condition 343.1 268.6 590.5 160.9 217.2 32.3

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
7.2 -7.2 44.0 55.8 12.0 10.8 10.8 -10.8 66.1 83.8 18.0 16.2
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
173
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.06 -15.06 54.01 20.5 25.1 7.531 22.6 -22.6 81.0 30.7 37.7 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
7.2 -7.2 44.0 55.8 12.0 10.8 10.8 -10.8 66.1 83.8 18.0 16.2
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.1 -15.1 54.0 20.5 25.1 7.5 22.6 -22.6 81.0 30.7 37.7 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
174
Transverse Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 9.4 -9.4 26.4 248.6 7.2 46.8 14.0 -14.0 39.6 372.8 10.8 70.2
Superstr.
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1 22.6 -22.6 7.5 96.7 11.3 37.7
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
7.2 -7.2 26.4 180.8 7.2 36.0 10.8 -10.8 39.6 271.2 10.8 54.0
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1 22.6 -22.6 7.5 96.7 11.3 37.7
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
175
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
7.2 -7.2 26.4 180.8 7.2 36.0 10.8 -10.8 39.6 271.2 10.8 54.0
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1 22.6 -22.6 7.5 96.7 11.3 37.7
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Vertical Seismic Case

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
31.2 -31.2 26.4 74.5 7.2 14.0 46.8 -46.8 39.6 111.7 10.8 21.0
Superstr. 1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5 75.3 -75.3 -42.6 29.0 11.3 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
176
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
24.0 -24.0 26.4 61.2 7.2 10.8 36.0 -36.0 39.6 91.8 10.8 16.2
Superstr. 1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5 75.3 -75.3 -42.6 29.0 11.3 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 7.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
24.0 -24.0 26.4 61.2 7.2 10.8 36.0 -36.0 39.6 91.8 10.8 16.2
Superstr. 1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
1.5 50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5 75.3 -75.3 -42.6 29.0 11.3 11.3
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
177
A-2.2 One Span Dislodged Condition
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr. 1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.75 15.1 -15.1 54.0 20.5 25.1 7.5 11.3 -11.3 40.5 15.4 18.8 5.6
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.75 15.1 -15.1 5.0 64.4 7.5 25.1 11.3 -11.3 3.8 48.3 5.6 18.8
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
178
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 (Accompanying) 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr. 1.5
1.5
1.5
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 120.4 0.0 45.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.1 0.0 9.1 0.0
Seismic Force on
0.75 50.2 -50.2 -28.4 19.3 7.5 7.5 37.7 -37.7 -21.3 14.5 5.6 5.6
Substr.
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR SEISMIC COMBINATION

Longitudinal Seismic LWL Condition HFL Condition
Live load Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No.
case t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
SC1 LL1 Case 343.1 268.6 590.5 160.9 217.2 32.3 339.7 265.2 543.9 160.9 197.4 32.3
SC2 LL2 Case 339.9 271.8 590.5 132.9 217.2 27.5 336.4 268.4 543.9 132.9 197.4 27.5
SC3 LL3 Case 339.9 271.8 590.5 132.9 217.2 27.5 336.4 268.4 543.9 132.9 197.4 27.5
Transverse Seismic
SC4 LL1 Case 343.1 268.6 490.6 487.9 183.6 107.8 339.7 265.2 444.0 487.9 163.9 107.8
SC5 LL2 Case 339.9 271.8 490.6 386.2 183.6 91.7 336.4 268.4 444.0 386.2 163.9 91.7
SC6 LL3 Case 339.9 271.8 490.6 386.2 183.6 91.7 336.4 268.4 444.0 386.2 163.9 91.7
Vertical Seismic
SC7 LL1 Case 428.5 183.2 440.5 159.1 183.6 32.3 425.1 179.7 393.9 159.1 163.9 32.3
SC8 LL2 Case 417.8 193.9 440.5 139.2 183.6 27.5 414.4 190.5 393.9 139.2 163.9 27.5
SC9 LL3 Case 417.8 193.9 440.5 139.2 183.6 27.5 414.4 190.5 393.9 139.2 163.9 27.5
Load Case Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
No. t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
SC10 166.9 144.3 476.6 15.4 178.3 5.6 163.5 140.9 430.0 15.4 158.6 5.6
Transverse Seismic
SC11 166.9 144.3 439.9 48.3 165.2 18.8 163.5 140.9 393.2 48.3 145.4 18.8
Vertical Seismic
SC12 193.2 117.9 414.8 14.5 165.2 5.6 189.8 114.5 368.2 14.5 145.4 5.6
179
11.B Serviceability Limit State (For verification of structural strength)
B-1 Rare Combination
B-1.1 Service Condition
Factor
DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.8 0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 0.0 23.9 0.0
Surcharge
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Condition Total Forces 291.2 285.1 289.1 91.7 91.3 0.0
LWL Condition Total Forces 294.7 288.5 321.8 91.7 100.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1.2 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.8 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 1 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.75
Shear Rating 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 0.0 23.9 0.0
Surcharge 0.8
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
180
DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1.2 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.8 19.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 1 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 0.0 23.9 0.0
Surcharge 0.8
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Condition
Total Forces 331.0 324.9 289.1 91.7 91.3 0.0
B-1.2 One Span Dislodged Condition

DL (Superstr.) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.4 0.0 23.9 0.0
Surcharge 0.8
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
181
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR RARE COMBINATION
HFL Condition
Live Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No. load LL Leading
t t t-m t-m t t
case
LL1
R1 LL leading, thermal accompanying 291.2 285.1 289.1 91.7 91.3 0.0
case
LL2
case
LL3
case
Load Case No. LL Leading
t t t-m t-m t t
LWL Condition
t t t-m t-m t t
case
LL1
case
LL2
case
LL3
case
t t t-m t-m t t
182
11.C Serviceability Limit State (For checking crack width)
C-1 Quasi-permanent Combination
C-1.1 Service Condition
Factor
DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL1 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Surcharge 0
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Surcharge 0
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
183
DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 16.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 0 79.4 73.3 36.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Surcharge 0
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Condition
Total Forces 248.3 248.3 189.0 0.0 57.4 0.0
C-1.2 One Span Dislodged Condition

DL (Superstr.) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(Leading) 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 147.4 0.0 66.1 0.0
(LWL) 1
Earth pressure
0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 114.7 0.0 57.4 0.0
(HFL) 1
Live load
0.0 0.0 79.3 0.0 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Surcharge 0
Weight of
115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 74.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
substructure 1
Buyoyancy 0.15 -22.8 -22.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -3.4 -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
184
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR QUASI-PERMANENT COMBINATION
HFL Condition
t t t-m t-m t t
case
LL1
QP1 LL leading, thermal accompanying 211.8 211.8 189.0 0.0 57.4 0.0
case
LL2
case
LL3
case
t t t-m t-m t t
LWL Condition
t t t-m t-m t t
case
LL1
case
LL2
case
LL3
case
t t t-m t-m t t
185
12.DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT
186
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT SHAFT
L-L
As'
ML
T-T
1.0m sk
MT
As
8.4m sk 5.33E-01
Provision of Reinforcement
L-L direction
2
Compression Face 83 No. 12 mm dia bar AsL' = 9364.5 mm
2
Tension Face 83 No. 20 mm dia bar AsL = 26012.4 mm
T-T direction
2
Compression Face 6 No. 12 mm dia bar AsL' = 663.5 mm
2
Tension Face 6 No. 12 mm dia bar AsL = 663.5 mm
Dia of Distribution Reinforcement = 12 mm

Effective Cover d' = 97 mm
Percentage of vertical reinforcement in shaft = 0.42% > 0.30% OK Cl. 710.3.2,IRC:78-2014
Modular ratio m = 6.25

2
Effective area of c/s A = 8.6 m (8.4*1000*1*1000+(6.25-1)*(9,364.5+26,012.4+663.5+663.5))/1000000
M.I about T-T axis IT = 7.00E+11 + 1.5E+11
4
= 8E-01 m
M.I about L-L axis IL = 4.94E+13 + 1.5E+11
4
= 5E+01 m
Radius of gyration about T-T axis iT = 0.31 m
Radius of gyration about L-L axis iL = 2.40 m
Unsupported length of wall L = 2.57 m

Effective Length along L-L direction lL (=2.3L) = 5.9 m (Table 11.1, IRC:112-2011)
Effective Length along T-T direction lT (=2.3L) = 5.9 m (Table 11.1, IRC:112-2011)
Slenderness ratio along L-L λL = lL/iT = 18.80

Slenderness ratio along T-T λT = lT/iL = 2.46
λL/λT = 7.65 (Clause 8.3.2 (3), IRC:112-2011)

λT/λL = 0.13 OK
beq = iT√12 = 1.088 m

heq = iL√12 = 8.318 m
According to Cl. 8.2.1 (6) of IRC:112-2011,

The effect of axial force can be ignored if it doesnot exceed 0.08f ck times the cross sectional area
0.08fck*Ag = 2352 t
P ML MT eL = ML/P eT = MT/P (eT/heq)/( (eT/heq)/(e

Check for P Check
t t-m t-m m m eL/beq) L/beq)
Max P
430.8 1024.9 198.0 2.38 0.46 0.03 39.57 No further check reqd
Case P can be ignored
Min P 200.1 538.2 0.0 P can be ignored 2.69 0.00 0.00 0.00 No further check reqd
Max ML 430.6 1024.9 198.0 P can be ignored 2.38 0.46 0.03 39.57 No further check reqd
Min ML 200.1 299.1 0.0 P can be ignored 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 No further check reqd
187
ULS and SLS Checks of Abutment Section
ULS and SLS strengths of abutment section is checked using Function in VBA excel. The summary is attached below
Under ULS, moment capacity of the section is checked.
Under SLS, stress and crack width are checked.
Load case 1 to 4 are for ULS

Load case 5 to 8 are for SLS stress check from Rare combination
Load case 9 to 12 are for SLS stress check from Quasi-permanent combination
ULS CASE FOR interaction

LOAD P MT=MY ML=MZ
CASE kN kN-m kN-m
1 Max P Case 4307.6 1980.2 10248.6
2 Min P Case 2000.5 0.0 5382.3
3 Max ML Case 4305.9 1980.2 10248.9
4 Min ML Case 2000.5 0.0 2991.3
Distribution Reinforcement
Distribution reinforcement = 0.2 % of gross area Designed as flexure member
2
Distribution reinforcement per meter height = 2000 mm /m
2
Distribution reinforcement per meter height on each face = 1000 mm /m
Provide 12 mm dia bars @100 mm c/c on each face

2
Ast,provided per meter height = 1131.0 mm /m OK
Minimum area of horizontal reinf. per meter = 25 % of Area of vertical reinf. or 0.001Ac whichever is greater
2
= 1000.00 mm /m Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011
2
Total area of horizontal reinf. provided per meter = 2261.9 mm /m OK
Dia. Of bar = max(1/4*dia of vertical bar, 8mm) Cl. 16.3.2, IRC:112-2011

= 8 mm
> 12 mm OK
Maximum spacing = 300 mm
> 100 mm OK
188
13.CHECK FOR PILE CAPACITY
189
13 Combination for Foundation Design (unfactored)
A Normal Case
Distance between CG of Pile to CG of abutment stem = 0 m
Pile cap Bottom Level 0
A.1 Service Condition 0
0
Unactored Forces
Load Item Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To be in
LL1 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 safer side
FPLL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 310.9 0.0 108.7 0.0 component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 130.4 0.0 38.3 0.0 "P" of earth
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 and
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 surcharge is
Weight of soil on Pile cap 93.94 93.94 -124.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 not
considered.
Buyoyancy -82.20 -82.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Forces at HFL 472.5 466.4 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
Total Forces at LWL 554.7 548.6 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0

Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in
LL2 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0
safer side
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 310.9 0.0 108.7 0.0
component
not
Weight of soil on Pile cap 93.94 93.94 -124.48 0.00 0.00 0.00
considered.
Buyoyancy -82.20 -82.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
190
Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To be in
LL2 79.4 73.3 51.7 91.7 10.0 0.0 safer side
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 310.9 0.0 108.7 0.0 component
Weight of soil on Pile cap 93.94 93.94 -124.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 not
Buyoyancy -82.20 -82.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 considered.
A.2 One Span Dislodged Condition
Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 310.9 0.0 108.7 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 130.4 0.0 38.3 0.0

Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on Pile cap 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
191
HFL Condition
Live load Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No.
case t t t-m t-m t t
N1 LL1 case 472.5 466.4 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
N2 LL2 case 472.5 466.4 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
N3 LL3 case 472.5 466.4 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
Load Case No.
t t t-m t-m t t
N4 293.1 293.1 239.2 0.0 147.0 0.0
LWL Condition
Live load Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No.
case t t t-m t-m t t
N1 LL1 case 554.7 548.6 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
N2 LL2 case 554.7 548.6 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
N3 LL3 case 554.7 548.6 290.9 91.7 157.0 0.0
Load Case No.
t t t-m t-m t t
N4 375.3 375.3 239.2 0.0 147.0 0.0
192
13 Combination for Foundation design (unfactored)
B Seismic Case
Pile cap Bottom Level
Distance between CG of Pile to CG of abutment stem = 0 m
Thermal force factor = 0.5
B.1 Service Condition


Unfactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To be in safer
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 side vertical
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 component
Seismic forces on "P" of earth
12.6 -12.6 83.8 95.6 16.2 14.0
Superstr. and surcharge
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 is not
considered.
Seismic forces on
20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.20 -82.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
HFL Total 441.9 374.8 585.6 145.7 275.2 21.6
LWL total 524.1 457.0 585.6 145.7 275.2 21.6

Unfactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 To be in safer
side vertical
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 component
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on and surcharge
9.7 -9.7 83.8 72.0 16.2 10.8
Superstr. is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 considered.
Seismic forces on
20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 439.0 377.7 585.6 122.2 275.2 18.3
193

Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
12.6 -12.6 50.3 318.7 9.7 46.8 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
considered.
Seismic forces on
20.3 -20.3 -42.9 106.0 10.2 25.1
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 429.2 363.1 443.7 428.4 243.4 71.9
LWL total 511.4 445.3 443.7 428.4 243.4 71.9

Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
9.7 -9.7 50.3 234.8 9.7 36.0 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
considered.
Seismic forces on
20.3 -20.3 -42.9 106.0 10.2 25.1
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 439.0 377.7 452.0 359.1 245.0 61.1
LWL total 427.3 365.9 576.4 359.1 245.0 61.1
194

Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
42.1 -42.1 50.3 95.5 9.7 14.0 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
considered.
Seismic forces on
67.8 -67.8 -243.2 211.9 10.2 7.5
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 518.8 297.9 251.7 325.8 245.0 21.6
LWL total 601.0 380.1 251.7 325.8 245.0 21.6

Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
32.4 -32.4 50.3 77.4 9.7 10.8 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
considered.
Seismic forces on
67.8 -67.8 -243.2 211.9 10.2 7.5
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 509.1 307.6 251.7 307.7 245.0 18.3
195
B.2 One Span Dislodged Condition Seismic load factor 0.5
Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 side vertical
component
and surcharge
Seismic forces on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 is not
Superstr.
considered.
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
7.5 -7.5 21.2 15.9 12.6 3.8
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 300.6 285.6 455.5 15.9 235.7 3.8
196
Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 To be in safer
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 considered.
Seismic forces on
7.5 -7.5 -15.9 53.0 3.8 12.6
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 300.6 285.6 418.4 53.0 226.9 12.6
Unactored Forces
t t t-m t-m t t
DL (Superstr.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
w/c)
SIDL (w/c) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
To be in safer
Shear Rating 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
side vertical
Earth Pressure 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
component
LL Surcharge 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
"P" of earth
Seismic forces on
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 and surcharge
Superstr.
is not
Weight of Substr. 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
considered.
Seismic forces on
25.1 -25.1 -90.1 106.0 3.8 3.8
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on
93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile cap
Buyoyancy -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
HFL Total 318.2 268.0 344.2 106.0 226.9 3.8
197
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR SEISMIC COMBINATION FOR FOUNDATION
HFL Condition
Load Case No. Live load case
t t t-m t-m t t
S1 LL1 Case 441.9 374.8 585.6 145.7 275.2 21.6
S2 LL2 Case 439.0 377.7 585.6 122.2 275.2 18.3
Transverse Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t
S3 LL1 Case 429.2 363.1 443.7 428.4 243.4 71.9
S4 LL2 Case 439.0 377.7 452.0 359.1 245.0 61.1
Vertical Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t
S5 LL1 Case 518.8 297.9 251.7 325.8 245.0 21.6
S6 LL2 Case 509.1 307.6 251.7 307.7 245.0 18.3
Load Case Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT

No. t t t-m t-m t t
Long. Seismic S7 300.6 285.6 455.5 15.9 235.7 3.8
Trans. Seismic S8 300.6 285.6 418.4 53.0 226.9 12.6
Vertical Seismic S9 318.2 268.0 344.2 106.0 226.9 3.8
LWL Condition
t t t-m t-m t t
S1 LL1 Case 524.1 457.0 585.6 145.7 275.2 21.6
S2 LL2 Case 427.3 365.9 710.1 122.2 275.2 18.3
Transverse Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t
S3 LL1 Case 511.4 445.3 443.7 428.4 243.4 71.9
S4 LL2 Case 427.3 365.9 576.4 359.1 245.0 61.1
Vertical Seismic
t t t-m t-m t t
S5 LL1 Case 601.0 380.1 251.7 325.8 245.0 21.6
S6 LL2 Case 497.4 295.8 376.2 307.7 245.0 18.3
Load Case Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT

No. t t t-m t-m t t
Long. Seismic S7 288.9 273.8 580.0 15.9 235.7 3.8
Trans. Seismic S8 288.9 273.8 542.9 53.0 226.9 12.6
Vertical Seismic S9 306.4 256.2 468.7 106.0 226.9 3.8
198
13a. Pile CHECK unfactored
Total No. of Pile = 8 Nos T-T

Dia of Pile 1.0 m
Pile No. Longitudinal Transverse

A xi2 yi2
xi yi
1 -1.50 4.50 1 2.3 20.3
2 -1.50 1.50 1 2.3 2.3
3 -1.50 -1.50 1 2.3 2.3
4 -1.50 -4.50 1 2.3 20.3
5 1.50 4.50 1 2.3 20.3 L-L
6 1.50 1.50 1 2.3 2.3 10.3 Traffic Direction
7 1.50 -1.50 1 2.3 2.3
8 1.50 -4.50 1 2.3 20.3
9 0.0 0.0
10 0.0 0.0
11 0.0 0.0
12 0.0 0.0 4.30
8 18 90 Plan of footing
13.a.1 Normal
HFL Condition
Both Span present condition
Forces/Moments For Pmax For Pmin Horizontal
Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HL HT HR/pile
t t t-m t-m t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t
N1 473 466 291 92 39 36 33 30 88 85 82 79 59 59 59 59 39 36 33 29 87 84 81 78 58 58 58 58 157.0 0.0 19.6
N2 473 466 291 92 39 36 33 30 88 85 82 79 59 59 59 59 39 36 33 29 87 84 81 78 58 58 58 58 157.0 0.0 19.6
N3 473 466 291 92 39 36 33 30 88 85 82 79 59 59 59 59 39 36 33 29 87 84 81 78 58 58 58 58 157.0 0.0 19.6
One span dislodged condition
N4 293 293 239 0 17 17 17 17 57 57 57 57 37 37 37 37 17 17 17 17 57 57 57 57 37 37 37 37 147.0 0.0 18.4
LWL Condition
Both Span present condition
N1 555 549 291 92 50 47 44 41 98 95 92 89 69 69 69 69 49 46 43 40 97 94 91 88 69 69 69 69 157.0 0.0 19.6
N2 555 549 291 92 50 47 44 41 98 95 92 89 69 69 69 69 49 46 43 40 97 94 91 88 69 69 69 69 157.0 0.0 19.6
N3 555 549 291 92 50 47 44 41 98 95 92 89 69 69 69 69 49 46 43 40 97 94 91 88 69 69 69 69 157.0 0.0 19.6
One span dislodged condition
N4 375 375 239 0 27 27 27 27 67 67 67 67 47 47 47 47 27 27 27 27 67 67 67 67 47 47 47 47 147.0 0.0 18.4
199
13.a.2 Seismic
HFL Service Condition
Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HL HT R
S1 442 375 586 146 14 9 4 -1 111 106 102 97 55 55 55 55 5 0 -4 -9 103 98 93 88 47 47 47 47 275.2 21.6 34.5
S2 439 378 586 122 12 8 4 0 110 106 102 98 55 55 55 55 5 0 -4 -8 102 98 94 90 47 47 47 47 275.2 18.3 34.5
S3 429 363 444 428 38 24 10 -5 112 98 83 69 54 54 54 54 30 16 1 -13 104 89 75 61 45 45 45 45 243.4 71.9 31.7
S4 439 378 452 359 35 23 11 -1 110 99 87 75 55 55 55 55 28 16 4 -8 103 91 79 67 47 47 47 47 245 61.1 31.6
S5 519 298 252 326 60 49 38 28 102 91 80 70 65 65 65 65 33 22 11 0 74 64 53 42 37 37 37 37 245 21.6 30.7
S6 509 308 252 308 58 48 38 27 100 90 79 69 64 64 64 64 33 23 12 2 75 65 54 44 38 38 38 38 245 18.3 30.7

S7 301 286 455 16 0 0 -1 -1 76 76 75 75 38 38 38 38 -1 -2 -3 -3 74 74 73 73 36 36 36 36 235.7 3.8 29.5
S8 301 286 418 53 5 4 2 0 75 73 72 70 38 38 38 38 3 2 0 -2 73 71 70 68 36 36 36 36 226.9 12.6 28.4
S9 318 268 344 106 16 13 9 6 74 70 67 63 40 40 40 40 10 7 3 0 67 64 60 57 33 33 33 33 226.9 3.8 28.4
LWL Service Condition
Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HL HT R
S1 524 457 586 146 24 19 14 9 122 117 112 107 66 66 66 66 16 11 6 1 113 108 103 99 57 57 57 57 275.2 21.6 34.5
S2 427 366 710 122 0 -4 -8 -12 119 115 111 106 53 53 53 53 -7 -11 -15 -20 111 107 103 99 46 46 46 46 275.2 18.3 34.5
S3 511 445 444 428 48 34 20 6 122 108 94 79 64 64 64 64 40 26 12 -3 114 100 85 71 56 56 56 56 243.4 71.9 31.7
S4 427 366 576 359 23 11 -1 -13 119 107 95 83 53 53 53 53 16 4 -8 -20 112 100 88 76 46 46 46 46 245 61.1 31.6
S5 601 380 252 326 70 60 49 38 112 102 91 80 75 75 75 75 43 32 21 10 85 74 63 52 48 48 48 48 245 21.6 30.7
S6 497 296 376 308 46 36 26 15 109 99 88 78 62 62 62 62 21 11 1 -10 84 73 63 53 37 37 37 37 245 18.3 30.7
S7 289 274 580 16 -11 -12 -12 -13 85 85 84 84 36 36 36 36 -13 -14 -14 -15 83 83 82 82 34 34 34 34 235.7 3.8 29.5
S8 289 274 543 53 -6 -8 -10 -12 84 82 80 79 36 36 36 36 -8 -10 -12 -14 82 80 79 77 34 34 34 34 226.9 12.6 28.4
S9 306 256 469 106 5 1 -3 -6 83 79 76 72 38 38 38 38 -2 -5 -9 -12 76 73 69 66 32 32 32 32 226.9 3.8 28.4
Normal case Seismic case

Maximum Compression capacity of pile = 200 t 250 t
Maximum uplift allowed = -50 t -62.5 t
Horizontal Capacity (from Geotech Report) = 25 t
Normal
Maximum Axial Force Condition Normal(Pmax) Minimum Axial Force Condition Normal(Pmin)
Maximum Axial force = 98 t Maximum Axial force = 97 t
Minimum Axial force = 17 t Minimum Axial force = 17 t
Maximum Axial force = 98 t OK Maximum horizontal force = 19.6 t OK

Minimum Axial force = 17 t OK
200
HORIZONTAL CAPACITY OF PILES (GRANULAR SOIL)
Pile dia 1.00 m

Grade of concrete M35
Moment of inertia I 4.91E-02 m4
Modulus of deformation E 3.10E+04 Mpa
= 3.10E+07 kN/m2
EI = 1.52E+06 kN-m2
Free Length of pile "e" = 0.500 m
Calculation of length of fixity (Lf)
N 16 Blows
nh 2264 kN/m3
T =(EI/nh)0.2 3.68 m
e/T 0.14
zf/T 2.16
zf 7.96 m
MAXIMUM MOMENT IN PILE
Fix End Moment in Pile is given by
MF= Q ( L1 + LF)/2 (for Fix Head piles, refer to Cl.

C.2.1 of Append. C)
and Actual Maximum Moment in Pile is given by
M = m * ( MF )
or
M = m * Q ( L1 + LF)/2
Where
m = Reduction Factor (from Fig. 3A of Append. C,
corresponding to L1/R or LF/T)
for L1/T = 0.14 and piles in sands & normally loaded clays
m = 0.85 (from Fig. 3 of Append. C)
Therefore
M = Maximum Moment in Pile
M = m * Q ( L1 + LF)/2
= 0.85 * Q * ( 0.5 + 7.96 )/2
= 3.60 * Q
Therefore
Maximum Moment in Pile = 3.60 * Q
where Q is Lateral load in tons
201
14.DESIGN OF PILE
202
14 Combination for Pile stress check (factored)
C-1 BASIC
Footing Bottom Level
C.1.a Both Spans present

C.1.a.1 Maximum Reaction case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.5 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 23.8 22.0 15.5 27.5 3.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1.15 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 18.3 16.9 11.9 21.1 2.3 0.0
Shear Rating 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.5 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 657.6 0.0 247.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 237.6 0.0 69.8 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 12.6 -12.6 83.8 95.6 16.2 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on Pile
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Forces at HFL Condition LL Leading 653.1 651.3 637.9 27.5 320.2 0.0
LL Accompanying
423.3 266.4 739.0 21.1 319.5 0.0
Total Forces at LWL Condition LL Leading 538.6 536.8 805.9 27.5 320.2 0.0
LL Accompanying
308.9 307.4 802.3 21.1 319.5 0.0
C.1.a.2 Maximum Longitudinal Moment case

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.5 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 23.8 22.0 15.5 27.5 3.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1.15 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 18.3 16.9 11.9 21.1 2.3 0.0
Shear Rating 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.5 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 657.6 0.0 247.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 237.6 0.0 69.8 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 9.7 -9.7 83.8 72.0 16.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Accompanying
423.3 421.9 634.3 21.1 319.5 0.0
LL Accompanying
308.9 307.4 802.3 21.1 319.5 0.0
203
C.1.b One Span Dislodged Condition

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1.15 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.5 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 657.6 0.0 247.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 237.6 0.0 69.8 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 7.5 -7.5 21.2 15.9 12.6 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Accompanying
270.1 270.1 622.4 0.0 317.2 0.0
LL Accompanying
155.6 155.6 790.4 0.0 317.2 0.0
14.1 SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR BASIC COMBINATION

14.1.a HFL Condition
Load Case No. load Leading/Acco
case mpanying t t t-m t-m t t
(C-1)1 LL1 LL Leading 653 651 638 28 320 0
(C-1)2 case LL Accompanying423 266 739 21 320 0
(C-1)3 LL2 LL Leading 653 651 638 28 320 0
(C-1)4 case LL Accompanying423 422 634 21 320 0
Load Case No.
Leading/Acco t t t-m t-m t t
(C-1)7 LL Leading 494 494 622 0 317 0
(C-1)8 LL Accompanying270 270 622 0 317 0
14.1.b LWL Condition
Live LL
Load Case No. load Leading/Acco
case mpanying t t t-m t-m t t
(C-1)1 LL1 LL Leading 539 537 806 28 320.2 0.0
(C-1)2 case LL Accompanying309 307 802 21 319.5 0.0
(C-1)3 LL2 LL Leading 539 537 806 28 320.2 0.0
(C-1)4 case LL Accompanying309 307 802 21 319.5 0.0
Load Case No.
Leading/Acco t t t-m t-m t t
(C-1)7 LL Leading 380 380 790 0 317.2 0.0
(C-1)8 LL Accompanying156 156 790 0 317.2 0.0
204
C-2 RARE
C.2.a Both Spans present

C.2.a.1 Maximum Reaction case
DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (excluding w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.3 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 20.7 19.1 13.4 23.9 2.6 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.3 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 569.9 0.0 214.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 12.6 -12.6 83.8 95.6 16.2 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on Substr. 0 20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile Cap Weight 1 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Weight of soil on Pile cap 1 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 312.7 311.5 576.1 18.3 274.6 0.0
LL Accompanying 231.1 229.9 700.6 18.3 274.6 0.0
C.2.a.2 Maximum Longitudinal Moment case

DL (Superstr.) 1 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.3 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 20.7 19.1 13.4 23.9 2.6 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.3 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 569.9 0.0 214.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 9.7 -9.7 83.8 72.0 16.2 10.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile Cap Weight 1 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 312.7 311.5 576.1 18.3 274.6 0.0
LL Accompanying 231.1 229.9 700.6 18.3 274.6 0.0
205
C.2.b. One Span Dislodged Condition

DL (Superstr.) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Leading) 1.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 (Accompanying) 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.3 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 569.9 0.0 214.5 0.0
LL Surcharge 1 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0
Seismic forces on
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pile Cap Weight 1 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL Accompanying 196.9 196.9 565.8 0.0 272.6 0.0
LL Accompanying 115.2 115.2 690.3 0.0 272.6 0.0
HFL
Load Case No. load Leading/Accompa
case nying t t t-m t-m t t
(C-2)1 LL1 LL Leading 483.6 482.0 579.2 23.9 275.2 0.0
(C-2)2 case LL Accompanying 312.7 311.5 576.1 18.3 274.6 0.0
(C-2)3 LL2 LL Leading 483.6 482.0 579.2 23.9 275.2 0.0
Load Case No. Leading/Accomp
anying t t t-m t-m t t
(C-2)7 LL Leading 363.0 363.0 565.8 0.0 272.6 0.0
(C-2)8 LL Accompanying 196.9 196.9 565.8 0.0 272.6 0.0
LWL
Load Case No. load Leading/Accompa
case nying t t t-m t-m t t
(C-2)1 LL1 LL Leading 402.0 400.4 703.7 23.9 275.2 0.0
(C-2)3 LL2 LL Leading 402.0 400.4 703.7 23.9 275.2 0.0
Load Case No.
Leading/Accomp t t t-m t-m t t
(C-2)7 LL Leading 281.3 281.3 690.3 0.0 272.6 0.0
(C-2)8 LL Accompanying 115.2 115.2 690.3 0.0 272.6 0.0
206
C-3 SISMIC
C-3 Service Condition

C.3.a Longitudinal Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 12.6 -12.6 83.8 95.6 16.2 14.0 18.9 -18.9 125.6 143.4 24.3 21.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5 30.5 -30.5 85.8 47.7 50.8 11.3
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Forces at HFL Condition 681.9 582.8 418.7 194.8 252.1 32.3
Total Forces at LWL Condition 343.2 244.1 586.8 194.8 252.1 32.3

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 9.7 -9.7 83.8 72.0 16.2 10.8 14.6 -14.6 125.6 108.1 24.3 16.2
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 20.3 -20.3 57.2 31.8 33.9 7.5 30.5 -30.5 85.8 47.7 50.8 11.3
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
207
C.3.b Transverse Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.7 0.1 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 12.6 -12.6 50.3 318.7 9.7 46.8 18.9 -18.9 75.4 478.1 14.6 70.2
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 20.3 -20.3 -42.9 106.0 10.2 25.1 30.5 -30.5 -64.4 159.0 15.3 37.7
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 9.7 -9.7 50.3 234.8 9.7 36.0 14.6 -14.6 75.4 352.2 14.6 54.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 20.3 -20.3 -42.9 106.0 10.2 25.1 30.5 -30.5 -64.4 159.0 15.3 37.7
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
208
C.3.c Vertical Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 42.1 -42.1 50.3 95.5 9.7 14.0 63.1 -63.1 75.4 143.3 14.6 21.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 67.8 -67.8 -243.2 211.9 10.2 7.5 101.7 -101.7 -364.8 317.9 15.3 11.3
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Forces at HFL Condition 797.3 467.4 -82.2 464.9 206.8 32.3

DL (Superstr.) 1.35 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 135.0 135.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 15.9 14.7 10.3 18.3 2.0 0.0 3.2 2.9 2.1 3.7 0.4 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 32.4 -32.4 50.3 77.4 9.7 10.8 48.6 -48.6 75.4 116.1 14.6 16.2
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
1.5 67.8 -67.8 -243.2 211.9 10.2 7.5 101.7 -101.7 -364.8 317.9 15.3 11.3
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Forces at HFL Condition 782.7 482.0 -82.2 437.7 206.8 27.5
209
C-3.2 One Span Dislodged Condition
a Longitudinal Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 7.5 -7.5 21.2 15.9 12.6 3.8 5.6 -5.6 15.9 11.9 9.4 2.8
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
b Transverse Seismic Case

LWL Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 7.5 -7.5 -15.9 53.0 3.8 12.6 5.6 -5.6 -11.9 39.7 2.8 9.4
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
210
c Vertical Seismic Case
DL (Superstr.) 1.35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SIDL (w/c) 1.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
FPLL1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Shear Rating 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Earth Pressure 1 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 438.4 0.0 165.0 0.0
LL Surcharge 0.2 0.0 0.0 198.0 0.0 58.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 39.6 0.0 11.6 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Superstr.
Weight of Substr. 1.35 115.2 115.2 -77.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 155.6 155.6 -104.7 0.0 0.0 0.0
Seismic forces on
0.75 25.1 -25.1 -90.1 106.0 3.8 3.8 18.8 -18.8 -67.6 79.5 2.8 2.8
Substr.
Pile Cap Weight 1.35 166.1 166.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 224.2 224.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1.35 93.9 93.9 -124.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 126.8 126.8 -168.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
cap
Buyoyancy 0.15 -82.2 -82.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -12.3 -12.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
SUMMARY OF LOAD CASES FOR SEISMIC COMBINATION FOR FOUNDATION

Live Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Load Case No.
load t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
LL1
SCF1 343.2 244.1 586.8 194.8 252.1 32.3 681.9 582.8 418.7 194.8 252.1 32.3
Case
LL2
SCF2 563.1 472.7 586.8 159.4 252.1 27.5 677.6 587.1 418.7 159.4 252.1 27.5
Case
Transverse Seismic LWL Condition HFL Condition
Load Case No.
LL1
SCF4 564.9 465.9 384.7 637.8 206.5 107.8 679.4 580.4 216.6 637.8 206.5 107.8
Case
LL2
SCF5 563.1 472.7 386.3 514.8 206.8 91.7 677.6 587.1 218.3 514.8 206.8 91.7
Case
Vertical Seismic LWL Condition HFL Condition
Load Case No.
LL1
SCF7 682.8 352.9 85.9 464.9 206.8 32.3 797.3 467.4 -82.2 464.9 206.8 32.3
Case
LL2
SCF8 668.2 367.5 85.9 437.7 206.8 27.5 782.7 482.0 -82.2 437.7 206.8 27.5
Case
LL3
SCF9 668.2 367.5 85.9 437.7 206.8 27.5 782.7 482.0 -82.2 437.7 206.8 27.5
Case
LWL Condition HFL Condition
Load Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT Pmax Pmin ML MT HL HT
Case t t t-m t-m t t t t t-m t-m t t
Longitudinal Seismic SCF10 385.5 374.2 389.1 11.9 186.0 2.8 499.9 488.7 221.1 11.9 186.0 2.8
Transverse Seismic SCF11 385.5 374.2 361.3 39.7 179.4 9.4 499.9 488.7 193.3 39.7 179.4 9.4
Vertical Seismic SCF12 398.6 361.0 305.7 79.5 179.4 2.8 513.1 475.5 137.6 79.5 179.4 2.8
211
14.a Calculation of factored reaction to obtain reinforcement in pile
Total No. of Pile = 8 Nos T-T

Dia of Pile = 1m
Pile No. Longitudinal A

Transverse xi2 yi2
xi yi
1 -1.50 4.50 1.00 2.3 20.3
2 -1.50 1.50 1.00 2.3 2.3
3 -1.50 -1.50 1.00 2.3 2.3
4 -1.50 -4.50 1.00 2.3 20.3
5 1.50 4.50 1.00 2.3 20.3 Traffic direction
6 1.50 1.50 1.00 2.3 2.3 L-L
7 1.50 -1.50 1.00 2.3 2.3
8 1.50 -4.50 1.00 2.3 20.3
8.00 18 90 Plan of pilecap
C Combination for Design of PILE

C-1 BASIC
HFL
Span present condition
Load HL HT
Case Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 tot tot HR/pile
t t t-m t-m t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t
(C-1)1 653 651 638 28 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 320 0 40
(C-1)2 423 266 739 21 -8 -8 -9 -10 116 115 114 113 -27 -28 -29 -29 96 95 95 94 320 0 40
(C-1)3 653 651 638 28 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 320 0 40
(C-1)4 423 422 634 21 1 0 0 -1 107 106 105 105 1 0 0 -1 107 106 105 105 320 0 40
(C-1)5 653 651 638 28 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 30 29 28 27 136 135 134 133 320 0 40
(C-1)6 423 422 634 21 1 0 0 -1 107 106 105 105 1 0 0 -1 107 106 105 105 320 0 40

(C-1)7 494 494 622 0 10 10 10 10 114 114 114 114 10 10 10 10 114 114 105 114 317 0 40
(C-1)8 270 270 622 0 -18 -18 -18 -18 86 86 86 86 -18 -18 -18 -18 86 86 0 86 317 0 40
212
LWL
Load HL HT
Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 tot tot HR/pile
Case
(C-1)1 539 537 806 28 2 1 0 -1 136 135 134 133 1 0 -1 -1 136 135 86 133 320 0 40
(C-1)2 309 307 802 21 -27 -28 -29 -29 107 106 105 104 -27 -28 -29 -29 106 106 0 104 320 0 40
(C-1)3 539 537 806 28 2 1 0 -1 136 135 134 133 1 0 -1 -1 136 135 0 133 320 0 40
(C-1)4 309 307 802 21 -27 -28 -29 -29 107 106 105 104 -27 -28 -29 -29 106 106 0 104 320 0 40
(C-1)7 380 380 790 0 -18 -18 -18 -18 113 113 113 113 -18 -18 -18 -18 113 113 134 113 317 0 40
(C-1)8 156 156 790 0 -46 -46 -46 -46 85 85 85 85 -46 -46 -46 -46 85 85 105 85 317 0 40
C-2 RARE
HFL
Load
Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 HL HT HR/pile
Case
(C-2)1 484 482 579 24 13 13 12 11 110 109 108 108 13 12 12 11 110 109 108 107 275 0 34
(C-2)2 313 312 576 18 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
(C-2)3 484 482 579 24 13 13 12 11 110 109 108 108 13 12 12 11 110 109 108 107 275 0 34
(C-2)4 313 312 576 18 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
(C-2)5 484 482 579 24 13 13 12 11 110 109 108 108 13 12 12 11 110 109 108 107 275 0 34
(C-2)6 313 312 576 18 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 -8 -9 -9 -10 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
0 0 0 0
(C-2)7 363 363 566 0 -2 -2 -2 -2 93 93 93 93 -2 -2 -2 -2 93 93 93 93 273 0 34
(C-2)8 197 197 566 0 -23 -23 -23 -23 72 72 72 72 -23 -23 -23 -23 72 72 72 72 273 0 34
LWL
Load
HL HT HR/pile
Case Pmax Pmin ML MT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
(C-2)1 402 400 704 24 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 108 108 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 109 108 275 0 34
(C-2)2 231 230 701 18 -29 -29 -30 -30 88 88 87 86 -29 -29 -30 -31 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
(C-2)3 402 400 704 24 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 108 108 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 109 108 275 0 34
(C-2)4 231 230 701 18 -29 -29 -30 -30 88 88 87 86 -29 -29 -30 -31 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
(C-2)5 402 400 704 24 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 108 108 -7 -8 -9 -10 110 109 108 108 275 0 34
(C-2)6 231 230 701 18 -29 -29 -30 -30 88 88 87 86 -29 -29 -30 -31 88 87 87 86 275 0 34
0 0
(C-2)7 281 281 690 0 -22 -22 -22 -22 93 93 93 93 -22 -22 -22 -22 93 93 93 93 273 0 34
(C-2)8 115 115 690 0 -43 -43 -43 -43 72 72 72 72 -43 -43 -43 -43 72 72 72 72 273 0 34
213
C-3 SEISMIC
HFL
Load HL HT
Case
SCF1 682 583 419 195 60 54 47 41 130 123 117 110 48 41 35 28 117 111 117 110 252 32 32
SCF2 678 587 419 159 58 52 47 42 128 122 117 112 46 41 36 31 116 111 117 112 252 27 32
SCF4 679 580 217 638 99 78 56 35 135 114 92 71 86 65 44 23 122 101 92 71 207 108 29
SCF5 678 587 218 515 92 75 58 41 129 111 94 77 81 64 47 29 117 100 94 77 207 92 28
SCF6 678 587 218 515 92 75 58 41 129 111 94 77 81 64 47 29 117 100 94 77 207 92 28
SCF7 797 467 -82 465 130 114 99 83 116 101 85 70 89 73 58 42 75 59 85 70 207 32 26
SCF8 783 482 -82 438 127 112 97 83 113 98 84 69 89 74 60 45 75 61 84 69 207 27 26
SCF9 783 482 -82 438 127 112 97 83 113 98 84 69 89 74 60 45 75 61 84 69 207 27 26

SCF10 500 489 221 12 45 44 44 43 82 81 81 80 43 43 42 42 80 80 81 80 186 3 23
SCF11 500 489 193 40 48 47 46 44 81 79 78 77 47 46 44 43 79 78 78 77 179 9 22
SCF12 513 475 138 79 57 54 51 49 80 77 74 72 52 49 47 44 75 72 74 72 179 3 22
LWL
Load HL HT
Case
SCF1 343 244 587 195 4 -3 -9 -16 102 95 89 82 -9 -15 -22 -28 89 83 89 82 252 32 32
SCF2 563 473 587 159 29 24 19 14 127 122 117 111 18 13 8 2 116 111 117 111 252 27 32
SCF4 565 466 385 638 70 49 28 7 135 113 92 71 58 37 16 -6 122 101 92 71 207 108 29
SCF5 563 473 386 515 64 47 30 12 128 111 94 77 53 35 18 1 117 100 94 77 207 92 28
SCF7 683 353 86 465 101 86 70 55 116 100 85 69 60 45 29 14 75 59 85 69 207 32 26
SCF8 668 367 86 438 98 84 69 54 113 98 83 69 61 46 31 17 75 60 83 69 207 27 26
SCF9 668 367 86 438 98 84 69 54 113 98 83 69 61 46 31 17 75 60 83 69 207 27 26

SCF10 385 374 389 12 16 16 16 15 81 81 80 80 15 15 14 14 80 79 80 80 186 3 23
SCF11 385 374 361 40 20 19 17 16 80 79 78 76 19 17 16 15 79 78 78 76 179 9 22
SCF12 399 361 306 79 28 26 23 20 79 77 74 71 24 21 18 16 75 72 74 71 179 3 22
214
15.a Circular Pile Moment capacity check (ULS) case
Radius of Circle = 0.500 m
Cover to Reinforcement = 0.0995 m
No of bars = 10
Diameter of bars = 0.0250 m
Area =3.14×0.025^2/4×10 = 0.00491 m2
Grade of Concrete = 35
gm = 1.5
Grade of Steel = 500

gm = 1.15
Area of Column =3.14×0.500^2 = 0.785 m2

Area of Steel = 0.00491 m2
% Steel = 0.625 %
Puz =(0.67×35×0.785/1.5+500×0.00491/1.15)×1000
= 14405.3 KN
Level of pilecap Bottom = 96.7 m
Level of pile fixity considered for design = 88.2 m
Depth of fixity (As per IS 2911 - for no scour) = 8.46 m
Moment due to water current on pile alone = 0.0 kNm
Max Lateral force at piercap bottom = 317.8 kN
Max moment in pile = 1142.3 kNm
Check for critical loads case

P M COMMENT
L/C KN KN m Bars are bundled for ease of construction.
P max 1362 1142
Pmin -464 1142
OK
215
15.b Analysis of Pile for SLS case
MY
X
Diameter "D"
Radius 0.500 m
Effective Cover 0.0995 m
No of bars 10 Nos.
Diameter of bar 0.025 m
Code of Practise IRC

Modular Ratio m 6.45
Permissible stress in concrete = 0.48*fck = 16.8 MPa
Permissible stress in reinforcement = 0.8*fyk = 300 MPa
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for bending Compression 16.8 N/mm2
Permissible Stresses in Concrete for Tension 3.00 N/mm2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Compression 300 N/mm2
Permissible Stresses in Steel for Tension 300 N/mm2
2
A concrete 785398 mm
2
Area of Steel 4909 mm
Percentage of Steel 0.63 %
Area of concrete to resist axial load only

2
= 1100.8×10000 / 16.8 655267 mm
2
Area of Steel = 0.8% of above 5242 mm
Area of Steel = 0.3% of gross Area 2356 mm2

Depth of fixity (As per IS 2911 - for no scour) = 8.46 m
Maximum force = 25.48 t
Moment due to water current on pile alone = 0.00 tm
Maximum moment = 91.6 tm
Check for critical loads case
L/C P M COMMENT
KN KN m Bars are bundled for ease of construction.
C-2 Pmax 1101 916
C-2 Pmin 431 916
216
MOMENT OF RESISTANCE OF RECTANGULAR CONCRETE SECTION
As per IRC:112-2011
0.0035 fcd
xu,lim 0.002 0.416xu,lim

Cu
deff Neutral Axis
0.87fy/Es Tu = 0.87fy*Ast
Ast Strain Diagram Stress Diagram
ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
Grade of Concrete fck = 30 N/mm2

As per clause 6.4.2.8, IRC:112-2011
fcd = α*fck = 13.40
γm
α = 0.67
f cd  R lim 
p t , lim = 97 . 3 1 - 1 - 2 . 055 

f yd  
f cd 
Grade of steel fY = 500 N/mm 2
fYd = 434.8 N/mm2
Refer Fig. 6.2 of IRC:112-2011

For steel reinforcement, simplified bilinear diagram is used
Minimum strain in steel reinforcement = 0.87fy/Es

Es = 2.0E+05 MPa
Cu = fcd*b*(3/7xu,lim + 2/3*4/7xu,lim)
= 17/21*fcd*b*xu
= 0.8095*fcd*b*xu
cg of compression block from top = 0.416xu
Tu = (fy/1.15)*Ast
Rlim = Mu,Lim/bd2 = 0.8095fcd*(xu/d)*(1-0.416*xu/d)
xu,lim/d 0.617 pt A f  R 
= = st = 0.973 cd 1 - 1 - 2.055 
100 bd f yd  f cd 
Rlim = Mu,Lim/bd2 = 4.97
It is not necessary to check maximum strain limit as ideal plastic branch is used
Clause 8.2.1 (f), IRC:112-2011
Calculation of Reinforcement
Tensile reinforcement can be calculated from the following formula
where, R = Mu/bd2
Limiting percentage of steel reinforcement for balanced section
where, Rlim = Mu,Lim/bd2
217
DESIGN OF PILE CAP
T-T
0
fcd = 13.40 MPa
fyd = 434.8 MPa
Rlim = 4.97 MPa
P1
Clear cover = 99.5 mm
P1
Overall depth of pile cap = 1.5 m 4.3
Depth of soil over pile cap = 0.0 m
10.3 L-L
Width of abutment = 1.00 m
Dimension in other direction = 10.30 m 4.3
Longitudinal distance of CG of each pile 8.4
from face of equivalent square = 1.00 m
Transverse distance of CG of each pile

from face of equivalent square = 4.50 m
2.15 2.15
Load intensity due to self weight
2
of pile cap = 3.75 t/m 2.15 2.15
Load intensity due to weight of

2
soil upto GL over pile cap = 2 t/m
Weight of soil above GL on pile cap = 0 t/m Not taken being in safer side 4.3
ML Moment along L-L direction

MT Moment along T-T direction
Load on Individual Piles

P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 ML MT VL VT
S. No.
t t t t t t t-m t-m t t
1 29.9 28.9 28.0 27.1 136.2 135.3 134.3 133.4 637.9 27.5 136.2 136.2
2 -7.6 -8.3 -9.0 -9.7 115.6 114.9 114.1 113.4 739.0 21.1 115.6 115.6
3 29.9 28.9 28.0 27.1 136.2 135.3 134.3 133.4 637.9 27.5 136.2 136.2
4 1.1 0.4 -0.3 -1.0 106.8 106.1 105.4 104.7 634.3 21.1 106.8 106.8
5 29.9 28.9 28.0 27.1 136.2 135.3 134.3 133.4 637.9 27.5 136.2 136.2
6 1.1 0.4 -0.3 -1.0 106.8 106.1 105.4 104.7 634.3 21.1 106.8 106.8
7 9.9 9.9 9.9 9.9 113.7 113.7 113.7 113.7 622.4 0.0 113.7 113.7
8 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 -18.1 85.6 85.6 85.6 85.6 622.4 0.0 85.6 85.6
9 1.5 0.6 -0.3 -1.2 135.9 134.9 134.0 133.1 805.9 27.5 135.9 135.9
10 -27.2 -27.9 -28.6 -29.3 106.5 105.8 105.1 104.4 802.3 21.1 106.5 106.5
11 1.5 0.6 -0.3 -1.2 135.9 134.9 134.0 133.1 805.9 27.5 135.9 135.9
12 -27.2 -27.9 -28.6 -29.3 106.5 105.8 105.1 104.4 802.3 21.1 106.5 106.5
13 -18.4 -18.4 -18.4 -18.4 113.3 113.3 134.0 133.1 790.4 0.0 134.0 134.0
14 -46.4 -46.4 -46.4 -46.4 85.3 85.3 85.3 85.3 790.4 0.0 85.3 85.3
15 13.4 12.6 11.8 11.0 109.9 109.1 108.3 107.5 579.2 23.9 109.9 109.9
16 -8.0 -8.6 -9.2 -9.8 88.0 87.4 86.8 86.2 576.1 18.3 88.0 88.0
17 13.4 12.6 11.8 11.0 109.9 109.1 108.3 107.5 579.2 23.9 109.9 109.9
18 -8.0 -8.6 -9.2 -9.8 88.0 87.4 86.8 86.2 576.1 18.3 88.0 88.0
19 13.4 12.6 11.8 11.0 109.9 109.1 108.3 107.5 579.2 23.9 109.9 109.9
20 -8.0 -8.6 -9.2 -9.8 88.0 87.4 86.8 86.2 576.1 18.3 88.0 88.0
21 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 -1.8 92.5 92.5 92.5 92.5 565.8 0.0 92.5 92.5
22 -22.5 -22.5 -22.5 -22.5 71.8 71.8 71.8 71.8 565.8 0.0 71.8 71.8
23 -7.2 -8.0 -8.8 -9.6 110.1 109.3 108.5 107.7 703.7 23.9 110.1 110.1
24 -28.6 -29.2 -29.8 -30.4 88.2 87.6 87.0 86.4 700.6 18.3 88.2 88.2
25 -7.2 -8.0 -8.8 -9.6 110.1 109.3 108.5 107.7 703.7 23.9 110.1 110.1
26 -28.6 -29.2 -29.8 -30.4 88.2 87.6 87.0 86.4 700.6 18.3 88.2 88.2
27 -7.2 -8.0 -8.8 -9.6 110.1 109.3 108.5 107.7 703.7 23.9 110.1 110.1
28 -28.6 -29.2 -29.8 -30.4 88.2 87.6 87.0 86.4 700.6 18.3 88.2 88.2
29 -22.4 -22.4 -22.4 -22.4 92.7 92.7 92.7 92.7 690.3 0.0 92.7 92.7
30 -43.1 -43.1 -43.1 -43.1 71.9 71.9 71.9 71.9 690.3 0.0 71.9 71.9
31 60.1 53.6 47.1 40.6 129.9 123.4 116.9 110.4 418.7 194.8 129.9 129.9
32 57.8 52.5 47.1 41.8 127.6 122.2 116.9 111.6 418.7 159.4 127.6 127.6
33 57.8 52.5 47.1 41.8 127.6 122.2 116.9 111.6 418.7 159.4 127.6 127.6
34 98.8 77.5 56.2 35.0 134.9 113.6 92.3 71.1 216.6 637.8 134.9 134.9
35 92.2 75.1 57.9 40.8 128.6 111.5 94.3 77.1 218.3 514.8 128.6 128.6
36 92.2 75.1 57.9 40.8 128.6 111.5 94.3 77.1 218.3 514.8 128.6 128.6
37 129.8 114.3 98.8 83.3 116.1 100.6 85.1 69.6 -82.2 464.9 129.8 129.8
38 126.6 112.0 97.4 82.8 112.9 98.3 83.7 69.1 -82.2 437.7 126.6 126.6
39 126.6 112.0 97.4 82.8 112.9 98.3 83.7 69.1 -82.2 437.7 126.6 126.6
40 44.7 44.3 43.9 43.5 81.5 81.1 80.7 80.3 221.1 11.9 81.5 81.5
41 48.4 47.0 45.7 44.4 80.6 79.3 77.9 76.6 193.3 39.7 80.6 80.6
42 56.6 54.0 51.3 48.7 79.6 76.9 74.3 71.6 137.6 79.5 79.6 79.6
43 3.7 -2.8 -9.2 -15.7 101.5 95.0 88.6 82.1 586.8 194.8 101.5 101.5
44 29.5 24.1 18.8 13.5 127.3 121.9 116.6 111.3 586.8 159.4 127.3 127.3
45 29.5 24.1 18.8 13.5 127.3 121.9 116.6 111.3 586.8 159.4 127.3 127.3
46 70.4 49.2 27.9 6.7 134.6 113.3 92.0 70.8 384.7 637.8 134.6 134.6
47 63.9 46.8 29.6 12.4 128.3 111.2 94.0 76.8 386.3 514.8 128.3 128.3
48 63.9 46.8 29.6 12.4 128.3 111.2 94.0 76.8 386.3 514.8 128.3 128.3
49 101.4 85.9 70.4 54.9 115.7 100.3 84.8 69.3 85.9 464.9 115.7 115.7
50 98.3 83.7 69.1 54.5 112.6 98.0 83.4 68.8 85.9 437.7 112.6 112.6
51 98.3 83.7 69.1 54.5 112.6 98.0 83.4 68.8 85.9 437.7 112.6 112.6
52 16.3 16.0 15.6 15.2 81.2 80.8 80.4 80.0 389.1 11.9 81.2 81.2
53 20.1 18.7 17.4 16.1 80.3 79.0 77.6 76.3 361.3 39.7 80.3 80.3
54 28.3 25.7 23.0 20.4 79.3 76.6 74.0 71.3 305.7 79.5 79.3 79.3
218
Longitudinal Direction
Design for Flexure
Critical section for moment is at the face of equivalent square
Moment due to piles (P1, P2, P3,P4) = 68.2 t-m/m

Moment due to piles (P5,P6,P7,P8) 86.4 t-m/m
Moment due to self weight and weight of soil upto GL above = 0.0 t-m/m (Neglected)
Additional moment due to torsion = 0 mm t-m/m
Net moment = 154.6 t-m/m
Effective depth required dreqd = √(Mu/(R*b)) = 557.5 mm
Effective depth provided dprovided = 1370.5 mm

OK
2
R = Mu/bd = ABS(154.62)*10000000/(1000*1370.5^2) 0.82
2
Ast, required = 2681.8 mm /m
2
Minimum Ast, required per meter width = 1781.7 mm /m (max. Of 0.26fctm/fyk*bt*d and 0.0013bt*d)
2
Governing Ast, required per meter width = 2681.8 mm /m
Provide
Bar Dia 20 mm 20 mm at bottom
+
Spacing c/c 200 mm 200 mm
2
Ast, provided = 3141.6 mm /m
OK
Maximum Ast per m width Ast,max = 34262.5 mm2/m (0.025Ac)
2
Minimum Ast, required per meter width = 1781.7 mm /m (max. Of 0.26fctm/fyk*bt*d and 0.0013bt*d)
2
Governing Ast, required per meter width = 1781.7 mm /m
Provide
Bar Dia 20 mm 20 mm at bottom
+
Spacing c/c 200 mm 200 mm
2
Ast, provided = 3141.6 mm /m
OK
2
Maximum Ast per m width Ast,max = 34262.5 mm /m (0.025Ac)
Design for Shear
Critical section for shear is shown in figure Critical section for shear
Load applied from the face of support av = 1.650 m

0.5d = 0.685 m
2d = 2.741 m
The multiplication factor by which VEd should be multiplied β=av/2d

β = 0.602
Where 0.5*d<av<2*d
β = 0.250
Where av=or <0.5*d
Hence in our case β = 0.602
Distance of critical section from face = 1.050 m
Shear due to piles (P1, P2, P3,P4) and (P5, P6,p6,p7) = 52.9 t/m
Shear due to self weight and weight of soil on pile cap upto GL = 3.5 t/m
Shear due to weight of soil on pile cap above GL = 0.0 t/m
Shear due to weight of RE wall = 0.0 t/m
Net Shear VEd = 28.4 t/m
219
2
Tensile Reinforcement Asl = 2513.3 mm
Width of beam bw = 1000 mm
Effective Depth d = 1370.5 mm
Ac = 1.37E+06 mm2
NEd = 0 kN
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2 = 1.38
d
νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.29
σcp = NEd/Ac < 0.2fcd = 0
ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.00183

bwd
Shear Capacity of section Cl. 10.3.2, IRC:112-2011

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd ≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd
= 47.8 t
> 28.4 t Safe in Shear
220
PUNCHING SHEAR CHECK
As per Clause 10.4.5, IRC:112-2011
Punching shear should be verified at the face of the column and at control perimeters within 2d from the face of the column
Cl. 10.4.5 (1), IRC:112-2011
PUNCHING OF PILE IN PILE CAP
Punching shear is checked for Pile P1 (corner pile) as maximum load comed on this pile
Maximum Axial force on pile = 129.8 t
-0.25m
P1
a
0.35m
Blown up view of corner pile
Punching Shear at u0 perimeter

a = 0 m
Length of control perimeter u0 = 1.98 m
V Ed Applied shear force
V Ed = 129.8 t
2
v Ed = V Ed = 47.35 t/m = 0.47 MPa OK
ud
Punching Shear Resistance

v Rd.max = 0.5*ν*f cd Cl. 10.4.6, Eqn. 10.43, IRC:112-2011
ν = 0.6(1-f ck /310) fck is in MPa

= 0.54
v Rd.max = 3.63 MPa
Punching Shear at u1 perimeter (a = 2d) (ignoring the presence of supports)

a = 2.761 m
Length of control perimeter u1 = 7.16 m
V Ed Applied shear force
V Ed = 129.8 t
2
v Ed = V Ed = 13.12 t/m = 0.13 MPa OK
ud
Punching Shear Resistance

v Rd = 0.12K(80 ρlfck)1/32d/a ≥ v min 2d/a Cl. 10.4.5, Eqn. 10.40, IRC:112-2011
K = 1+ √(200/d) ≤ 2 d is in mm
= 1.38
v min = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.480 MPa
ρl = √(ρ ly ρ lz ) ≤ 0.02
ρ ly = 0.00059
ρ lz = 0.001807
ρl = 0.001033
v Rd = 0.62 MPa
221
DESIGN OF ABUTMENT CAP
16 Design of Abutment Cap

The Abutment cap has been designed as per Clause 716.2.1 , IRC :78- 2000 .
The Abutment cap shall be reinforced with a total minimum of 1% steel distributed equally at both faces
and in both directions.
Length of Abutment cap = 8.40 m =
Width of Abutment cap = 1.67 m
Depth of Abutment cap 0.80 m =
Area of steel required (mm2) =

3757.5 mm2 24-12+10-16
47.46
Providing steel by distributing at top & bottom = 24 nos. 12 f 10 nos. 16 f
Area of steel provided (mm2) =4746 mm2 OK
Reinforcement in the direction of width of Abutment :-
Area of steel required (mm2)/m =400 mm2
Providing 2 legged stirrups,12 mm dia.
Spacing if stirrups required 5

=65.5 mm
Spacing Provided = 125 mm OK
222
DESIGN OF DIRTWALL
17 Design of Dirt Wall
1.67
Design values :
0.400 m g= 2.00 t/m3

1.943
1 2 ka = 0.279
1.084 t/m2 0.670 t/m2 Thickness of

0.400 m
dirtwall =
Earth Pressure diagram
height of
1.943 m
dirtwall,h =
1)Earth Pressure due to surcharge equivalent to 1.2m of earthfill = ka *g*1.2
= 0.670 t/m2
2)Earth Pressure due to backfill of earth = ka *g*h
= 1.084 t/m2
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*1.2*h2/2
= 1.264 t-m/m
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to earth pressure (1) = ka *g*h3*0.42/2
= 0.860 t-m/m
Calculation of force and moment due to the effect of braking :(considering 40t bogie loading)
2.13 10t 10t 8.40
2.79m
1.943
1.943 2.79 1.943
Effective width = 6.676 m
Braking force, 0.2*20 4 t

Braking force including impact of 50%= 6 t
Braking force per metre width = 0.90 t
Bending moment at the base of dirtwall due to effect of braking = 1.75 t-m/m
223
Bending Moment at the bottom of dirt wall for Basic Combination
Unfactored Factored
Partial
Load Item Safety B. M B. M
Factor
t-m/m t-m/m
LL
1.2 1.26 1.52
Surcharge
Earth
1.5 0.86 1.29
Pressure
Braking 1.5 1.75 2.62
Total Factored B.M 5.43
Design
Design factored moment at the base of dirtwall (t-m) = 5.43 t-m/m
Overall Depth Provided = 400 mm
Clear cover = 40 mm
Rlim = 4.97 MPa
Effective depth required dreqd = √(Mu/(R*b))

= 104.4 mm
Effective depth provided dprovided = 344 mm

OK
R = Mu/bd2 = 0.46
2
Ast, required = 369.3 mm
2
Minimum Ast, required per meter width = 447.2 mm (max. Of 0.26fctm/fyk*bt*d and 0.0013bt*d)
2
Governing Ast, required per meter width = 447.2 mm
Provide 12f @ 100 c/c

2
Ast, provided = 1131.0 mm
OK
Distribution Reinforcement
2
Secondary reinforcement required per meter = 89.4 mm
(20% of main reinforcement, Cl. 16.6.6.1, IRC:112-2011)
Provide 10f @ 200 c/c

2
Ast, provided = 392.7 mm
OK
Serviceability Limit State (Stress Check)

Bending Moment at the bottom of dirt wall for Rare Combination
Partial Unfactored Factored

Load Item Safety B. M B. M
Factor t-m/m t-m/m
LL
0.8 1.26 1.01
Surcharge
Earth
1 0.86 0.86
Pressure
Braking 1 1.75 1.75
Total Factored B.M 3.62
Modular ratio = 6.4516129

Effective depth provided = 344 mm
2
Ast provided = 1131.0 mm
Neutral axis depth = 63.9 mm

Cracked moment of inertia = 659434609 mm4
Section modulus (concrete) = 10314864 mm3
Section modulus (steel) = 2354539.3 mm3
Stress in concrete = 3.51 MPa OK

Stress in steel = 99.1 MPa OK
224
DESIGN OF END RETURN WALL
18 Design of End Return Wall

RECTANGULAR PART
a = 1.650
ka = 0.279
g = 2.0m
Live load Surcharge = 1.200m
b = 5.310
(SHt)
Partial Safety Factors (Basic Combination)

For LL Surcharge = 1.2
For Earth Pressure = 1.5
For M30 concrete

Fe500 steel reinf.
Rlim = 4.97 MPa
Q1=ka*g*SHt Q2=ka*g*b
The end return wall has been designed as a plate fixed on its two faces i.e. at the base and on one of its vertical sides.
( Refer Table 26 of Formula of Stress & Strain by Roark & Young ).
225
Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate
Height of Length of
Unfactored Factored
S.NO. return wall return wall "a/b"
Q1 (t/m2) b1 b2 g1 g2 (at x=a & z=0) Mb1 (at x=0 & z=0.8b) Ma1 (t-
(m) "b" (m) "a" Mb1 Ma1
(t-m/m) m/m)
1 5.31 1.65 0.311 0.670 0.265 0.290 0.620 0.336 -0.83 -0.91 -1.0 -1.1
Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

Factored Unfactored
"a/b" Q2
b1 b2 g1 g2 (at x=a & z=0) Mb2 (at x=0 & z=0.4b) Ma2 (t-
(t/m2) Mb2 Ma2
(t-m/m) m/m)
0.311 2.963 0.171 0.118 0.421 0.177 -2.39 -1.65 -3.6 -2.5
Design of end return wall

Factored
Ast for vertical Factored Moment in
Deff Thk. at Moment in R= R= Ast for horizontal reinforcement
Thk. at top Deff reqd. reinforcement horizontal
provided bottom vertical Mu/(bd2)
2
Mu/(bd ) (mm2)
(mm2) direction(Mh)
direction(Mv)
500 96 442 500 4.58 0.23 240 -3.56 0.182404 187
Vertical reinforcement Horizontal reinforcement

Earth face Earth face
spacing spacing Outer face spacing spacing Outer face
bar dia bar dia
reqd provided reqd provided
16f 836 c/c 100 c/c 10f @ 100 12f 605 c/c 200 c/c 10f @ 200 c/c
Ast provided (vertical) = 2010.6 mm2/m Ast provided (horizontal) = 565.5 mm2/m
2
Minimum reinforcement required at outer face = 574.6 mm /m (max. Of 0.26fctm/fyk*bt*d and 0.0013bt*d)
226
CHECK FOR SHEAR
Uniform load due to live load surcharge over entire plate

Unfactored Factored
For "a/b"
Q1 (t/m2) b1 b2 g1 g2 (at x=a & z=0) R1
(at x=0 & z=0.8b) R2 (t/m) R1 R2
(t/m)
0.311 0.670 0.265 0.290 0.620 0.336 2.20 1.20 2.6 1.4
Varying load due to earth pressure over entire plate

Unfactored Factored
For "a/b"
Q2 (t/m2) b1 b2 g1 g2 (at x=a & z=0) R3
(at x=0 & z=0.4b) R4 (t/m) R3 R4
(t/m)
0.311 2.963 0.171 0.118 0.421 0.177 6.62 2.79 9.9 4.2
Section At x = a & z = 0 At x = 0 & z = 0.4*b

D 500 700 mm
Grade of Concrete M 30 M 30
Deff 442 442 mm
Factored Design Shear Force (R1+R3) V 12.58 5.62 (t/m)
steel provided for bending rl <0.02 0.005 0.005
K= 1+sqrt(200/d)<=2 1.673 1.673
νmin = 0.031*K3/2*fck1/2 0.367 0.367
scp 0.00 0.00
Shear Capacity VRd.c 19.5 19.5 t
Check OK OK
Dia of links 0 0
Spacing of links 200 mm c/c 200 mm c/c
z = 0.9*d 397.8 397.8 mm
cotθ 2.5 2.5
Shear Capacity of steel reinf=
Asw/s*z*fywd*cotθ VRd.s 0.0 0.0 t
Check No Shear Reinf. No Shear Reinf.
227
DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESTRAINER
22 Design of Longitudinal restrainer

Width of hitting face = 0.575 m
Depth of hitting face = 0.8 m
Effective depth = 0.73 m
Force Lever arm Moment
t m t-m
Longitudinal force in each restrainer 6.00 0.65 3.90 R value is taken as 1
Provide 10 nos 20 mm dia main bar
1*12)/2
Seismic combinatiom
Design moment = 3.90 t-m
Design shear = 6.00 t
Check for Cantilever Action

Effective depth required = 0.089 m OK
R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.127
Ast required = 123.45 mm2
2
Minimum Ast required = 545.675 mm
Governing Ast required = 545.675 mm2
Ast provided = 3141.593 mm2 OK
2
2
Ac = 4.20E+05 mm
NEd = 0 kN
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2
d
= 1.52
νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.32
ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.00748

bwd

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd
≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd
= 19.9 t
> 6.0 t OK
Provide 4L 12 mm dia stirrups at 150 mm c/c
2
Asw = 452.4 mm >min shear reinforcement - OK
s = 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio

ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00079
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 68.03 mm
z = 0.9d 657.0 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm 347.8 MPa
cotθ 2.5
αcw 1 For σcp = 0
bw 575 mm
ν1 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa
Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement

VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 172.30 t
VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 104.7 t
Shear resistance of section = smaller of VRd.s and VRd.max

= 104.73 t
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK
228
DESIGN OF SEISMIC RESTRAINER
22 Design of Transverse restrainer

Width of hitting face = 0.8 m
Depth of hitting face = 0.9 m
Effective depth = 0.83 m
Force Lever arm Moment
t m t-m
Transverse force in each restrainer 23.38 0.65 15.20 R value is taken as 1
Provide 10 nos 20 mm dia main bar
3*46.76976
Seismic combinatiom
Design moment = 15.20 t-m
Design shear = 23.38 t
Check for Cantilever Action

Effective depth required = 0.175 m OK
R = Mu/bd^2 = 0.276
Ast required = 425.66 mm2
2
Minimum Ast required = 863.200 mm
Governing Ast required = 863.200 mm2
Ast provided = 3141.593 mm2 OK
2
2
Ac = 6.64E+05 mm
NEd = 0 kN
K = 1+ 200 ≤ 2
d
= 1.49
νmin = 0.031K3/2fck1/2 = 0.31
ρl = Asl ≤ 0.02 = 0.00473

bwd

VRd.c = [0.12K(80ρlfck)0.33 + 0.15σcp]bwd
≥ (νmin + 0.15σcp)bwd
= 26.5 t
> 23.4 t OK
Provide 6L 12 mm dia stirrups at 150 mm c/c
2
Asw = 678.6 mm >min shear reinforcement - OK
s = 150 mm
Minimum shear reinforcement ratio

ρmin = 0.072√fck/fyk
= 0.00079
2
Asw.min = ρmin*s*bw = 94.65 mm
z = 0.9d 747.0 mm
fywd = 0.8fyk/γm 347.8 MPa
cotθ 2.5
αcw 1 For σcp = 0
bw 800 mm
ν1 0.6 For fck ≤ 80MPa
Shear resistance by the yielding of shear reinforcement

VRd.s = (Asw/s)*z*fywd*cotθ
= 293.86 t
VRd.max = αcw*bw*z*ν1*fcd/(cotθ+tanθ)
= 165.7 t
Shear resistance of section = smaller of VRd.s and VRd.max

= 165.68 t
Provided Shear reinforcement is OK
229
Pipra To Gardi
Design of Pier for ( 11x20 m span )
Revision no. Date
230
1 : INTRODUCTION
Design of Substructure for minor bridge is presented here with. The structure consists of
RCC Girder supported by RCC Wall type abutments & rectangular Piers resting on
Pile Foundation
Superstructure Type : RCC Girder
Substructure : RCC RECTANGULAR Type Pier
Foundation : Pile Foundation
This Design Note is applicable to Following Structures
S.No Flyover Chainage Chainage

As per CA
1
As per Design
S.No Description Pier

LHS RHS
1 FRL 103.513 103.513
2 Camber / Superelevation % 2.00% 2.00%
3 WC + Girder Depth+slab 1.64 1.64
5 Width of Structure 8.40 8.40
6 Skew Angle 0 0
7 High Floor Level 100.923 100.923
8 Vertical Clearance 3.45 3.45
9 Soffit Level 101.873 101.873
10 Depth of Pile Cap 1.500 1.500
12 Ground level 98.423 98.423
13 Pile cap Top below GL(m) 0.500 0.500
14 Pile cap Top Level 97.923 97.923
15 Pile cap botom level 96.423 96.423
16 scour level at pier 96.043 96.043
231
Reference Codes
Standard Specification and Code of Practice for Road Bridges (Section

A) IRC 6:2014
II - Loads and Stresses)
B) IRC 112:2011 Code of Practice for Concrete Road Bridges
Standard Specification and Code of Practice for Road Bridges (Section

B) IRC 78:2014
VII - Foundations and Substructure)
232
INDEX
1 : INTRODUCTION
2 : GENERAL DETAILS OF Minor Bridge
3 : CALCUALTION OF GOVERNING LIVE LOAD REACTION
4 : CALCULATION OF SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
5 : LOAD CALCULATION ON PIER AND FOUNDATION
6 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
7 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
8 : SLENDERNESS CHECK AND CHECK FOR SECOND ORDER EFFECTS
9 : DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
10 : DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
11 : DESIGN PIER CAP - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
12 : DESIGN PIER CAP - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
13 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR CHECKING BASE PRESSURE
14 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF FOOTING - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
15 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF FOOTING - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
16 : CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM BASE PRESSURE
17 : DESIGN OF FOOTING - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
18 : DESIGN OF FOOTING - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
19 : DESIGN OF BEARING PEDESTAL
* ANNEXURE A : CALCULATION OF TRANSVERSE ECCENTRICITY OF LL
* ANNEXURE B : CALCULATION OF SAFE BEARING CAPACITY
233
2 : GENERAL DETAILS OF Minor Bridge
General Level details LHS RHS
Structure Width, m 8.400 (SQ) 8.400 (SK) Finished Road Level = 103.513 103.513 m
Skew Angle = 0.00 º deg Ground Level = 98.423 98.423 m
Expansion Gap = 0.020 m Pier Cap Bottom Level(Uniform Portion ) = 100.970 100.970 m
Wearing coat thk. Total = 0.065 m Pier Cap Bottom Level(Tapered Portion) = 100.320 100.320 m
Fill on deck due to transition = 0.000 m Footing top level = 97.923 97.923 m
Coffecient of friction( µ ) = 0.05 Foundation Level = 96.423 96.423 m
scour level at pier = 96.043 96.043 m
Camber/superelevation = 2.00% 2.00%
Superstructure Details
Superstructure Details LHS RHS
No of Girders = 3 SQ 3 SQ
C/C Span (Exp Gap to Exp Gap) = 20.00 20.000 m 20.00 20.000 m
C/C distance Brg to Exp (Long.) = 0.75 0.750 m 0.75 0.750 m
Proj. of beyond bearing = 0.730 m 0.730 m
Proj. of slab Transverse dir. = 1.20 m 1.20 m
C/C span (Brg to Brg) = 18.50 m 18.50 m
Girder proj beyond cl of brg = 0.350 m 0.350 m
Soffit Level = 101.873 m 101.873 m
Girder Details
Girder spacing = 3.000 m 3.000 m
Deck slab thk. = 0.225 m 0.225 m
Depth of girder = 1.35 m 1.35 m
Bearing Nos = 3 3
Type = Fixed Free
5
234
Pedestal (brg. +pedestal) = 0.300 m 0.300
Long. = 0.850 m 0.850 m
Transv. = 0.850 m 0.850 m
Pier Cap Long. = 2.61 m (3-1)*3+0.85+2*.0.125)
Transv. = 7.99 m Crash Barrier Height = 1.000 m
Projection beyond pedestal = 0.125 m at side from pier cap Width = 0.450 m
Proj. beyond pedestal = 0.125 m at Ends Hand rail Width of hand rail on LHS = 0.000 m
Pier Cap Top Level = 101.570 m Width of hand rail on RHS = 0.000 m
Thk. of Pier cap at tip = 0.60 m Footpath Width of footpath on LHS = 0.000 m
Width of footpath on RHS = 0.000 m
Crash Barrier
Thk. of Pier cap Taper = 0.65 m
Pier Longitudinal = 2.79 m
Tranverse = 1.00 m
Eccentricity wrt Bearing Center = 0.00
Wind Data
Basic Wind speed = 47.0 m/s Cd for single girder
Drag cofficient for Single Girder = 1.30 Cd shall not be < 1.3 b/d >= 6 1.3
Drag cofficient for Multiple Girder = 1.95 b/d = 2 1.5
Gust Factor = 2.0 b/d = 5.33 1.30
Soil Properties
Type of Soil = Sandy f for soil = 30 deg
Dry unit weight of soil = 2.0 t/m3 c for soil = 0.0
Submerged unit weight of soil = 1.0 t/m3
Design Constants
Grade of concrete = M 30 Unit wt. of concrete = 2.5 t/m3 E = 2.0E+05 mpa
Grade of steel = Fe 500 Unit wt.of Wearing coat = 2.2 t/m3
Modular Ratio = 10 Permissible Stress in Steel = 240.0 Mpa
PILE Data Permissible Stress in concrete = 10.00 Mpa
Total Pile depth = 20.0 m Pile net safe Cpacity = 300 Ton
Horizontal Pile capacity = 20.0 Ton Dia of piles = 1.00 m
Spacing of piles in transverse = 3.00 m Spacing of piles in longitudinal = 3.00 m
Total no of piles = 6.00 Nos Number of Rows of Piles LL = 2.00 Nos
Number of Rows of PilesTT = 2.00 Nos Edge Distance = 0.65 m
Thickness of pile cap = 1.50 m Length of Pile Cap (m) TT = 7.300 m
Length of Pile Cap (m) LL = 4.300 m
6
235
SupStr. Loads P Left P Right MT Left MT Right MT(tm) ML(tm)
DL (Girder + Slab + Diaphragm) = 100.6 100.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
SIDL Reaction = 19.0 19.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
Wearing Coat = 10.6 10.6 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
FPLL Reaction = 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
C/L of Brg C/L of Brg

C/L of Shaft
Girder Span = 20.000 Girder Span = 20.000 Finished Road Level 103.513
Pier Cap Top Level 101.570

2.610 100.970
Pier Cap Bottom Level 100.320

1.000
Ground Level 98.423
0.500 Pile cap top level 97.923

0.000
1.500
Founding Level 96.423
6.000
C/L of Footing
Pile
7
236
3 : CALCUALTION OF GOVERNING LIVE LOAD REACTION
m 0.05 Eccentricity of LL = 0.000 m

Longitudinal Forces_due to LL & DL LHS RHS
LL Reaction LHS LL Reaction RHS Fh, Braking Fixed Free Net Hori. Force
Fh/2+ HL (20%
A1 P1 P1 A2 P (t) ML (tm) LSH RHS Fh -m(Rg+Rq) m(Rg+Rq) m(Rg+Rq) HL
m(Rg+Rq) LL)
1 Class A - 1 Lane Loading

a 31.69 60.31 59.32 40.68 119.63 0.74 18.40 20.00 10.31 17.29 9.47 9.47 26.76 15.58
b 8.71 59.29 27.51 4.49 86.80 23.83 13.60 6.40 6.66 13.74 7.88 7.88 21.62 14.51
3 Class 70R Wheel -1 Lane Loading
e 19.41 33.29 27.54 27.86 60.83 4.31 10.54 11.08 3.06 12.75 7.90 7.90 20.65 14.54
f 3.91 16.49 26.76 8.24 43.26 7.70 4.08 7.00 -2.62 8.74 7.84 7.84 16.59 13.54
a : Class A 1 Lane near Crash Barrier e : Class 70R Wheel 1 Lane near Crash Barrier i : Class 70R Track 1 Lane near Crash Barrier
b : Class A 1 Lane at 7.25m f : Class 70R Wheel 1 Lane at 7.25m from CB j : Class 70R Track 1 Lane at 7.25m from CB
c : ClassA 3 Lane near Crash Barrier g: e+b k: i+b
d : ClassA 3 Lane at concentric at center h: a+f l: a+j
Live Load Reaction Summary h= 3.95 m

ML due to Live Load
A1 P1 P1 A2 P (t) ML due to P Fh LHS Eccen. MT HL MT
HL & P Combinations
c: 31.69 60.31 59.32 40.68 119.63 0.74 18.40 2.400 287.11 26.76 106.46 287.11 Class A - 1 Lane
Reactions
d: 8.71 59.29 27.51 4.49 86.80 23.83 13.60 2.400 208.33 21.62 109.25 208.33
e: 19.41 33.29 27.54 27.86 60.83 4.31 10.54 1.105 67.21 20.65 85.87 67.21 Class 70R -1 Lane
Reactions
f: 3.91 16.49 26.76 8.24 43.26 7.70 4.08 2.155 93.22 16.59 73.22 93.22
8
237
Design Live Load Values for Normal Case
LL -1 31.69 60.31 59.32 40.68 119.63 0.74 18.40 2.40 287.11 26.76 106.46 287.11 Pmax
LL -2 8.71 59.29 27.51 4.49 86.80 23.83 13.60 2.40 208.33 21.62 109.25 208.33 ML max
LL -3 31.69 60.31 59.32 40.68 119.63 0.74 18.40 2.40 287.11 26.76 106.46 287.11 MT max
LL -4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Pmin
20% Live Load Values for Seismic Case LL

LL -1 6.339 12.061 11.865 8.135 23.926 0.147 3.680 2.400 57.422 15.58 61.68 57.422 20%
LL -2 1.742 11.858 5.503 0.897 17.361 4.767 2.720 2.400 41.665 14.51 62.06 41.665
LL -3 6.339 12.061 11.865 8.135 23.926 0.147 3.680 2.400 57.422 15.58 61.68 57.422
LL -4 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000
Calculation of Thermal Load
Shear Modulus= 1.2 Mpa CL 915.2.1 page 8 IRC : 83 (Part II)

Elastomeric Bearing Max Temp = 45
l= 400 mm Min Temp = 0
b= 320 mm Assumed dimensions of bearing Mean Temp = 22.5 Fig 8 & 9 IRC:6-2014
h= 72 mm LHS RHS Max Bridge Temp = 32.5
Temperature Variation = 32.50 º 32.50 º Min Bridge Temp = 12.5 Cl. 215.4 IRC-6 2014
Temperature coefficient = 1.20E-05 1.20E-05 Max Fall = 32.5
Movement Due to temparature variation = 0.00000 m 0.00000 m Max Rise = 32.5 Cl. 215.4 IRC-6 2014
Shrinkage Coefficient = 2.00E-04 2.00E-04
Movent Due to shinkage = 0.00000 m 0.00000 m Temperature Shrinkage
Total movement of superstructure = 0.0000 m 0.0000 m Force Moment Force Moment
Total Load on Bearing = 0.00 t 0.00 t LHS Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Total Force on Pier = 0.00 t 0.00 t RHS Span 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Moment at Base of Pier, ML = 0.00 tm 0.00 tm 3.6 m from Base of Pier
Moment at Base of Footing, ML = 0.00 tm 0.00 tm 5.1 m from Base of Footing
9
238
4 : CALCULATION OF SEISMIC COEFFICIENT
Rocky (I) N>30 Sa/g= 2.500 0.0<= T <=0.40
12.690 0.40<= T <=4.0
Medium Soil (II) 10<n<30 Sa/g= 2.500 0.0<= T <=0.55
17.258 0.550<= T <=4.0
Soft Soil (III) N<10 Sa/g= 2.500 0.0<= T <=0.670
21.192 0.670<= T <=4.0
Transversel 2.786 m Long 1.00
Height of Pier including Pier cap = 3.65 m (101.570-97.923) LL % 20%
Grade of Concrete = 30 DL Reactions = 329.1 t
fcm= 40 LL Reactions = 23.9 t
Ecm= 31186.6 N/mm2
Modulus of elasticity Ec = 31186.6 N/mm2
Moment of Inertia IT = 1.802E+12 (for Transverse Seismic co-efficient)
Moment of Inertia IL = 2.322E+11 (for Longitudnal Seismic co-efficient)
Response Reduction Factor Long. Direction= 3
Response Reduction Factor Trans dirxn = 3
Importance Factor = 1.2 ZONE FACTOR
Zone No = IV As per
Zone Factor = 0.24 IRC: 6 - 2014
D.L & L.L of Super Structure = 3530.7 KN Zone No a
II 0.10
F = Horizontal force in KN required to be applied at center of mass of super- III 0.16
structure for 1 mm deflection at the top of pier/abutment along the IV 0.24
considered direction of horizontal force. V 0.36
for 1 mm deflection at x
L = 3647.0 mm
Force in transverse direction acting at dist. of = 0.984 + 0.30 1.28 m
Force in longitudinal direction acting at dist. of = 0.30 = 0.06 m
Force required Transv. PT= 2274 kN
Force required Long. PL= 437.0 kN
Period (T) = 0.079 sec
Period (L) = 0.180 sec
Type of Soil = II
Sa/g T= = 2.500
Sa/g L= = 2.500
Horizontal Coefficients Transv. = = 0.1200
Horizontal Coefficients Long. = = 0.1200
239
5 : LOAD CALCULATION ON PIER AND FOUNDATION Skew = 0º
Cos 0º 1.000
8.40 m Sin 0º 0.000
2.610 0.45
1.305 1.305 RL 103.513 1.00 Crash barrier

103.513
1.64 Girder+slab+WC
0.60
101.570 0.30 Ped. & Brg
e= 0.750 e= 0.750 0.00 0.60
100.320 7.99 m 0.65
0.00 0.00 HFL = 100.923
0.805 1.0 m 0.805

1.897 0.500 0.500 3.950
2.00 m 2.40 Pier height
LHS= 20.00 RHS= 20.00
GL= 98.423
97.923 Pile cap top lvl97.923
Sectional View of Pier
Span - LHS Y
Traffic
X
ML
Span - RHS
Elevation of Pier MT
Plan At Base of Pier
Density of Concrete = 2.50 t/m3
Density of Soil = 2.00 t/m3
a) Dead Loads
Superstructure Loads at pier base
Particulars Description P e ML
(t) (m) (tm)
Superstructure Loads
LHS Span Girder + Diaphragm 50.45 0.75 37.84
Deck Slab 50.11 0.75 37.58
RHS Span Girder + Diaphragm 50.45 -0.75 -37.84
Deck Slab 50.11 -0.75 -37.58 Trapezium volume
Pier Cap (h/3)*(a1+a2+sqrt(a1*a2))
Rectangular 2.5x7.985x2.61x0.6 31.3 0.00 0.00 a1= 20.84
Trapezoidal 15.86 0.00 0.00 a2= 1.9969
DL Additional weight of pier cap 0.00 0.91 0.00 Sqrt(a1*a2)= 6.45
Pedestal Nos Long Transv. Ht. h/3= 0.2166667
Self weight LHS Span 3 0.85 0.85 0.3 1.63 0.75 1.22 Volume = 6.35
RHS Span 3 0.85 0.85 0.3 1.63 -0.75 -1.22 weight = 15.86
Addi. Weight
LHS Span 0.000 0.00 0.00
RHS Span
Seismic Arrester LD TD VD LD - Longitudinal diamension
1 0.50 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.81 TD- Transverse dimension
1 0.50 0.80 0.90 0.90 0.91 0.81 VD - Vertical dimension
Pier
Self weight (1.9969*1+2*PI()*0.5^2/2)*2.4*2.5 16.69 0.00 0.00
SIDL SIDL
Crash Barriers, H/r & FPDL LHS Span 19.01 0.75 14.25
Crash Barriers, H/r & FPDL RHS Span 19.01 -0.75 -14.25
WC Wearing Coat
LHS Span 10.57 0.75 7.93
RHS Span 10.57 -0.75 -7.93
240
Straight span Skew span
Loads P (t) HL (t) HT (t) ML(tm) MT (tm) ML(tm) MT (tm)
Dead Load (Supstr, Substr.) 270.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
SIDL(CB,FPLL) 38.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
Wearing coat 21.1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
Total Dead Load at base 270.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0
Span Dislodge Condn 199.0 0.00 0.00 99.23 0.0 99.23 0.0
Friction force 0.00 6.51 0.00 25.70 0.0 25.70 0.0
b) Live Loads
LHS(m) RHS(m)
Eff. Span 18.50 18.50
Impact at Pier Base 0.000 0.000
Impact at Pier Top 1.184 1.184
Case Description P (t) HL (t) HT (t) ML(tm) MT (tm)
1 Pmax 119.6 0.00 0.00 0.7 287.1
Pmax (Skew) 119.6 0.00 0.00 0.7 287.1
2 MLmax 86.8 0.00 0.00 23.8 208.3
MLmax (Skew) 86.8 0.00 0.00 23.8 208.3
3 MT max 119.6 0.00 0.00 23.8 287.1
MT max(Skew) 119.6 0.00 0.00 23.8 287.1
4 Pmin 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
Pmin(Skew) 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0.0
241
c) Wind Loads
Wind Loads on LL
Height above the roadway surface = 3.0 m IRC:6 - 2014, 209.3.6
CG of deck above GL = 5.77 m
Wind Velocity on Live Loads = 39.6 Km/hr ( From Table 5, of IRC:6-2010)
Velocity is >36 m/s, hence No live load is considered on the bridge 209.3.7 of IRC:6-2014
On Highway bridges at 1.5m above road level, 209.3.6 of IRC:6-2014
Wind force on Live load = P* A* G* Cd 209.3.6 of IRC:6-2014
In this case, the length of Live Load on Bridge
Length of Superstructure = 18.5 m
Gust Factor G = 2.0 as per clause 209.3.3 of IRC 6:2014
Drag Coefficient Cd = 1.20 209.3.6 of IRC:6-2014
Wind pressure = 846.5 N/m2
Leverarm = 7.09 m
HT = 0.0 t At mid height
HL = 0.0 t 5.89 m
MT = 0.0 t-m 0.0 t-m At Pier Base
ML 0.0 t-m 0.0 t-m
Wind Load on Suprestructure
Wind force on superstructure = P *A *G *Cd IRC:6 - 2014, 209.3.3
Cd for Single Girder Drag Coefficient, Cd = 2.02 209.3.3 of IRC:6-2014
b/d Cd Wind Pressure on Supertructure = 846.5 N/m2 From Table 5, of IRC:6-2014
2 1.5 Ht. of supersturcture = 2.64 m 1.64+1
6 1.3 Length of Supersturucture = 18.5 m
5.12 1.34 HT = 16.67 t (2.64*18.5)*846.540*2.01585365853659*2/10000
25% HL = 4.17 t At mid height (25% of Transverse wind force)
Leverarm = 4.77 m 3.57 m
MT = 79.5 t-m 59.5 t-m
ML = 19.9 t-m 14.9 t-m
Horizontal Load in Transv. direction due to winds on superstructure

With Live Load HT = 16.7 t
MT = 79.5 t-m
Without Live Load HT = 16.7 t
MT = 79.5 t-m
Wind Loads on Substructure downward force = P *A3 *G *Cl
= 19.7 Ton
Wind Loads on Substructure

Transverse Tranverse Wind Longitudinal Wind
t/B 2.00 Lever arm = 3.03 m, at pier base 3.03 m, at pier base
2 2
Cd H/W Wind pressure in Transv. = 846.54 N/m 846.54 N/m
0.80 2.0 Pier Cap
0.80 4.0 Gust Factor, G = 2.00 2.00
0.80 1.828 Drag Coefficient, Cd = 0.80 0.80
b= 1.0 m HT = 0.44 t Moment At mid height 0.00 t At mid height
t= 2.0 m HL = 0.11 t 1.83 0.85 t 1.83
H= 3.7 m MT = 1.34 t-m 0.81 0.00 t-m 0.00
W= 2.0 m ML = 0.33 t-m 0.20 2.56 t-m 1.54
Longitudinal Pier Shaft

t/B 0.5007762 Lever arm = 1.45 m, at pier base 1.45 m, at pier base
2 2
Cd H/W Wind Pressure = 846.5 N/m 846.5 N/m
1.70 10.0 Gust Factor, G = 2.0 2.0
1.90 20.0 Drag Coefficient, Cd = 0.80 0.80
1.57 3.650 HT = 0.26 t At mid height 0.00 t At mid height
b= 2.0 m HL = 0.06 t 0.25 0.13 t 0.25
t= 1.0 m MT = 0.37 t-m 0.06 0.00 t-m 0.00
H= 3.7 m ML = 0.09 t-m 0.02 0.19 t-m 0.03
W= 1.0 m
242
Summary
Total Wind Loads at Pier Base (With LL)
P HL HT ML MT ML-mid MT -mid
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
-19.7 5.14 17.37 22.62 81.22 16.45 60.38 Straight
-19.7 5.14 17.37 22.62 81.22 16.45 60.38 Skew
Total Wind Loads at Pier Base(Without LL)
P HL HT ML MT ML-mid MT -mid
t t t t-m t-m t-m t-m
-19.7 5.14 17.37 22.62 81.22 16.45 60.38 without LL
-19.7 5.14 17.4 22.62 81.22 16.45 60.38 With Skew
d) Braking & friction forces
Normal Case - Straight Span Lever Arm 3.950 m 2.75 m
Braking and Frictional Force At Pier base At Mid height
Case P HL HT ML MT ML MT
t t t tm tm tm tm
Pmax 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00 73.60 0.00
ML max 2.31 21.62 0.00 85.42 0.00 59.47 0.00
MT max 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00 73.60 0.00
Pmin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span dislodge 0.00 6.51 0.00 23.75 0.00 15.94 0.00
Normal Case - Skew Span
t t t t-m t-m tm tm
Pmax 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00 73.60 0.00
ML max 2.31 21.62 0.00 85.42 0.00 59.47 0.00
MT max 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00 73.60 0.00
Pmin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Span dislodge 0.00 6.51 0.00 23.75 0.00 15.94 0.00
243
Seismic Case - Straight Span
t t t t-m t-m tm tm
Pmax 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 52.88 0.00 43.54
ML max 0.46 0.00 7.25 0.00 37.35 0.00 40.54
MT max 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 42.45 0.00 43.54
Pmin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic Case - Skew Span
t t t t-m t-m tm tm
Pmax 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 52.88 0.00 43.54
ML max 0.46 0.00 7.25 0.00 37.35 0.00 40.54
MT max 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 42.45 0.00 43.54
Pmin 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Coefficient Super Str Sub Str
Transverse dirn. 0.120 0.120

Longitudinal dirn. 0.120 0.120
Vertical dirn. 0.080 0.080
244
E) Seismic forces
Superstructure (0.3+0.6+0.65+2.40)+0.984
Pier Base At Mid ht
Lever arm Super Structure = 4.93m 3.73m CG of Superstructure from Soffit = 0.98 m
Lever arm Sub Structure = 1.83m 0.63m
a) Transverse direction
Dead Load 20% Live Load Values for Seismic Case
Description P (t) HT (t) P-LHS(t) P-RHS(t) Total Load HT(t) MT(tm)
0.00 Superstructure 260.3 31.2 LL -1 12.06 11.86 23.93 2.87 14.17
LL -2 11.86 5.50 17.36 2.08 10.28
260.3 31.2 LL -3 12.06 11.86 23.93 2.87 14.17
LL -4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
b) Longitudinal direction
Description P (t) HL (t) Seismic Forces in Vertical Direction
Superstructure 260.3 31.2
Description Fv (t)
260.3 31.2 Superstructure 20.82
Sub-Structure -Pier cap & pier Substructure 5.51
a) Transverse Direction Live Load Case LL-1 1.91
Location P (t) HT (t) Fv (t) Live Load Case LL-2 1.39
Pier base 68.9 8.3 5.51 Live Load Case LL-2 1.91
Mid height 60.5 7.3 4.84 Live Load Case LL-2 0.000
SEISMIC FORCES BY VIVEK
b) Longitudinal Direction
Location P (t) HL (t) Fv (t) r1+0.3r2+0.3r3
Pier base 68.9 8.3 5.5

Mid height 60.5 7.3 4.8 0.3r1+r2+.3r3
Eccentricity of pier cap & pier weight = 0.000 0.3r1+0.3r2+r3

Transverse Seismic Case P HL HT ML MT MLmid MTmid
Transverse Seismic case-1 8.47 11.85 42.37 50.76 183.35 36.54 132.51 0.3r1+r2+0.3r3
Transverse Seismic case-2 8.32 11.85 41.58 50.76 179.46 36.54 129.57
Longt. Seismic Case P HL HT ML MT MLmid MTmid ``

Longitudnal Seismic case -1 8.47 39.50 12.71 169.18 55.00 121.79 39.75 r1+0.3r2+0.3r3
Longitudnal Seismic case -2 8.32 39.50 12.47 169.18 53.84 121.79 38.87
Vertical Seismic Case P HL HT ML MT MLmid MTmid

Vertical Seismic case -1 28.25 11.85 12.71 50.76 55.00 10.96 39.75 0.3r1+0.3r2+r3
Vertical Seismic case -2 27.72 11.85 12.47 50.76 53.84 10.96 38.87
Seismic Combinations
Seismic Combinations P HL HT ML MT Mlmid Mtmid
1 0.3r1 + r2 + 0.3r3 8.47 11.85 42.37 50.76 183.35 36.54 132.51 Transv +ve
2 -0.3r1 - r2 -0.3r3 -8.47 -11.85 -42.37 -50.76 -183.35 -36.54 -132.51
3 r1 + 0.3r2 + 0.3r3 8.47 39.50 12.71 169.18 55.00 121.79 39.75 Long +ve
4 -r1 - 0.3r2 -0.3r3 -8.47 -39.50 -12.71 -169.18 -55.00 -121.79 -39.75
5 0.3r1 + 0.3r2 + r3 28.25 11.85 12.71 50.76 55.00 10.96 39.75 Vert +ve
6 -0.3r1 - 0.3r2 - r3 -28.25 -11.85 -12.71 -50.76 -55.00 -10.96 -39.75
245
Seismic Combinations skew
Seismic Combinations P HL HT ML MT MLlmid MTmid
1 0.3r1 + r2 + 0.3r3 8.47 11.85 42.37 50.76 183.35 36.54 132.51
2 -0.3r1 - r2 -0.3r3 -8.47 -11.85 -42.37 -50.76 -183.35 -36.54 -132.51
3 r1 + 0.3r2 + 0.3r3 8.47 39.50 12.71 169.18 55.00 121.79 39.75
4 -r1 - 0.3r2 -0.3r3 -8.47 -39.50 -12.71 -169.18 -55.00 -121.79 -39.75
5 0.3r1 + 0.3r2 + r3 28.25 11.85 12.71 50.76 55.00 10.96 39.75
6 -0.3r1 - 0.3r2 - r3 -28.25 -11.85 -12.71 -50.76 -55.00 -10.96 -39.75
F) Centrifugal force
V = 0km/hr
R = 0m
Lever arm at Pier base = 6.79 m
Lever arm at Pier mid height = 5.59 m
At Pier base At Mid height
t t t tm tm tm tm
Normal
LL-1 119.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-2 86.8 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-3 119.6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-4 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Seismic
LL-1 23.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-2 17.4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-3 23.9 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL-4 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
246
F) Water current forces (Cl. 210 of IRC: 6 - 2014)
P = 52 K V2 and V2 varies linearly with height, zero being at scour depth, and P in Kg/m 2
Traffic Flow Direction X
Z
Normal Current
20 º
Skew Current
7.985 m 2.61 m RL
2.61 m
101.570 HFL P
2
100.970 RL 100.923 0.189 t/m
100.320 0.60 m
0.189 t/m2 for pier cap
1.2 m
HFL 0.073 t/m2 for pier start
2.782 m 100.923 0.052 t/m2 for pier mid

1.00 m Reinf. Curtailment location
2.40 m
Width of pile cap =
1.2 m
7.3 m
2
Pile cap top 0.032 t/m for pier shaft bottom
97.923 0.073 t/m2 forPile cap top

Sill Level / pile cap top level
Scour depth below HFL = 4.88 m Pile cap bottom

1.50 m 0.015 t/m2 for pile
cap and piles
Max. velocity of flow = 1.10 m/s 96.423
0.38 m 4.300 m
Design velocity = 1.56 m/s
K for pier = 0.66
K for pier cap Pile and Pile cap = 1.5 96.043 SCOUR
Skew angle of normal current = 0 º
4 Depth of FIXITY
WATER CURRENT FORCES 6.21
FORCES ON PIERCAP FOR NORMAL CURRENT Avg. width = 5.384 m
Transverse Force at pier cap Base = 0.297 t Longitudinal Force at Base = 0.000 t
Transverse Moment at pier Base = 0.803 t-m Longitudinal Moment at pier Base = 0.000 t-m
Transverse Moment at Pile cap base = 1.248 t-m Longitudinal Moment at pile cap base 0.000 t-m
Transverse Moment at scour level = 3.092 t-m Longitudinal Moment at scour level = 0.000 t-m
FORCES ON PIERCAP FOR SKEW CURRENT Skew = 20 º

Transverse Force at pier cap Base = 0.279 t Longitudinal Force at Base = 0.210 t
Transverse Moment at pile cap base 1.173 t-m Longitudinal Moment at pile cap base = 0.881 t-m
Transverse Moment at scour level = 2.906 t-m Longitudinal Moment at scour level = 2.182 t-m
FORCES ON PIER FOR NORMAL CURRENT

Transverse Force at Base = 0.126 t Longitudinal Force at Base = 0.000 t
FORCES ON PIER FOR SKEW CURRENT Skew = 20 º
WATER CURRENT FORCES FOR PILE CAP FOR NORMAL CURRENT
Transverse Moment at pile cap base = 0.258 t-m Longitudinal Moment at pile cap base = 0.000 t-m
WATER CURRENT FORCES FOR PILE CAP FOR SKEW CURRENT Skew = 21 º
Transverse Moment at pile cap base = 0.242 t-m Longitudinal Moment at pile cap base = 0.150 t-m
WATER CURRENT FORCES ON PILES AT SCOUR FOR NORMAL CURRENT
TRANSVERSE FORCES Width of pile = 2 m
Force = 0.00558201 t Length of pile group = 3 m
Transverse Moment at scour level = 0.01767846 t-m
LONGITUDINAL FORCES
Force = 0 t
Longitudinal Moment at scour level = 0 t-m
WATER CURRENT FORCES ON PILES FOR SKEW CURRENT
TRANSVERSE FORCES
Force = 0.0052454 t
Transverse Moment at scour level = 0.0169445 t-m
247
LONGITUDINAL FORCES
Force = 0.0030242 t
Longitudinal Moment at scour level = 0.009251 t-m
BOUYANCY FORCES
Pier Cap = 8.47 t
Pier Shaft = 6.68 t 2.400*2.782*1
Pile cap = 47.09 t 1.5*7.3*4.3
Pile = 1.79 t
Summary of Forces due to Water Currents

For Skew Span
Total Loads at Pier Base Total Loads at Pier Base
Case P HL HT ML MT Case P HL HT ML MT
t t t t-m t-m t t t t-m t-m
Normal -15.15 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.97 Normal -15.15 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.97
Skew -15.15 0.46 0.61 0.94 1.20 Skew -15.15 0.46 0.61 0.94 1.20
Total Loads at base of Pile cap Total Loads at base of Pile cap
Normal -62.24 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.23 Normal -62.24 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.23
Skew -62.24 0.63 0.87 1.09 1.44 Skew -62.24 0.63 0.87 1.09 1.44
Total Loads at scour level Total Loads at scour level

Normal -64.03 0.00 0.71 0.00 1.25 Normal -64.03 0.00 0.71 0.00 1.25
Skew -64.03 0.63 0.88 1.10 1.46 Skew -64.03 0.63 0.88 1.10 1.46
248
6 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
S.N Description P HL HT ML MT
t t t tm tm
Basic Loads
0 No Loads 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dead Loads
1a DL 270.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1b SIDL 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1c Wearing Coat 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1d One span dislodged 199.0 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.0
2 Live Load
2a LL1 - Max. Vertical Load 119.6 0.00 0.00 0.74 287.11
2b LL2 - Max. Long. Moment 86.8 0.00 0.00 23.83 208.33
2c LL3 - Max. Transv. Moment 119.6 0.00 0.00 23.83 287.11
2d LL4 - Min. Vertical Load 0.0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 Seismic Loads
3a Transverse Seismic - +v direction 8.47 11.85 42.37 50.76 183.35
3b Transverse Seismic - -v direction -8.47 -11.85 -42.37 -50.76 -183.35
3c Longitudinal Seismic +v direction 8.47 39.50 12.71 169.18 55.00
3d Longitudinal Seismic -v direction -8.47 -39.50 -12.71 -169.18 -55.00
3e Vertical EQ +v direction 28.25 11.85 12.71 50.76 55.00
3f Vertical EQ -v direction -28.25 -11.85 -12.71 -50.76 -55.00
4 Wind Loads
4a Loaded Condition -19.73 5.14 17.37 22.62 81.22
4b Unloaded Condition -19.73 5.14 17.37 22.62 81.22
5 Centrifugal forces
5a CF1 - Max. Vertical Load 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5b CF2 - Max. Long. Moment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5c CF3 - Max. Transv. Moment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5d CF4 - Min. Vertical Load 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5e CF1 - Max.Vertical Load (seismic) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5f CF2 - Max.Long. Moment (seismic) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5g CF3 - Max.Transv.Moment (seismic) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5h CF4 - Min. Vertical Load (seismic) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6 Forces Due to Friction / Braking (DL & LL)
6a Friction, Braking - LL-1 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00
6b Friction, Braking - LL-2 2.31 21.62 0.00 85.42 0.00
6c Friction, Braking - LL-3 3.13 26.76 0.00 105.72 0.00
6d Friction, Braking - LL-4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6e Friction, Braking - LL-1 (Seismic) 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 43.54
6f Friction, Braking - LL-2 (Seismic) 0.46 0.00 7.25 0.00 40.54
6g Friction, Braking - LL-3 (Seismic) 0.63 0.00 7.79 0.00 43.54
6h Friction, Braking - LL-4 (Seismic) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6i Friction, Braking - Span dislodge 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.75 0.00
249
t t t tm tm
7 Water Current Forces
7a Normal Current -15.15 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.97
7b Skew Current -15.15 0.46 0.61 0.94 1.20
Loads Combination
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Basic Combination (Normal Case)
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + CF-1 + FF/BF
1 636.9 40.1 0.0 159.7 430.7
LL-1
2 586.5 32.4 0.0 163.9 312.5
LL-2
3 636.9 40.1 0.0 194.3 430.7
LL-3
4 452.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL-4

5 621.8 40.1 0.4 159.7 431.6
LL-1 + Water Current (Normal)

6 571.3 32.4 0.4 163.9 313.5

7 621.8 40.1 0.4 194.3 431.6

8 437.6 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0

9 621.8 40.6 0.6 160.6 431.9
LL-1 + Water Current (Skew)

10 571.3 32.9 0.6 164.8 313.7

11 621.8 40.6 0.6 195.3 431.9

12 437.6 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2
DL(One Span Dislodged) + Friction

13 268.7 0.0 0.0 169.6 0.0
Force due to DL

14 253.5 0.0 0.4 169.6 1.0
Force due to DL + Water Current (Normal)

15 253.5 0.5 0.6 170.5 1.2
Force due to DL + Water Current (Skew)
1 Max. Axial load case 636.9 40.1 0.0 159.7 430.7

11 Max. Long. Moment case 621.8 40.6 0.6 195.3 431.9
9 Max. Trans. Moment case 621.8 40.6 0.6 160.6 431.9
14 Min. Axial Load case 253.5 0.0 0.4 169.6 1.0
250
t t t tm tm
Basic Combination (Wind Case)
LL Load -Leading Load, Wind Load -Accompanying Loads
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + Wind Force +

15 619.2 44.8 15.6 180.0 503.8
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

16 568.7 37.1 15.6 184.2 385.6
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

17 619.2 44.8 15.6 214.7 503.8
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

18 435.0 4.6 15.6 20.4 73.1
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

19 CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1 + Water Current 604.0 44.8 16.1 180.0 504.7
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
Wind Load -Leading Load, Live Load -Accompanying Loads

27 564.4 38.5 26.1 156.4 452.0
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

28 525.7 32.6 26.1 159.6 361.4
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

29 564.4 38.5 26.1 182.9 452.0
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

30 423.2 7.7 26.1 33.9 121.8
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4
251
t t t tm tm
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
Wind Load -Leading Load & No LL condition

DL + SIDL + WC + Wind Force
39 423.2 7.7 26.1 33.9 121.8
(Unloaded)

40 408.0 7.7 26.5 33.9 122.8
(Unloaded) + Water Current (Normal)

41 408.0 8.2 26.7 34.9 123.0
(Unloaded) + Water Current (Skew)
EQ Load -Leading Load during service, Live Load -Accompanying Loads
Transverse Seismic Load Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQT (+ve) + CF-

42 489.6 17.8 65.1 76.3 341.2
1 (Seismic) + FF/BF LL-1 (Seismic)
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQT (-ve) + CF-

43 464.1 -17.8 -62.0 -76.0 -208.9

44 483.0 17.8 65.0 80.9 324.8
252
t t t tm tm

45 457.5 -17.8 -62.1 -71.4 -225.3

46 489.6 17.8 65.1 80.9 341.2

47 464.1 -17.8 -62.0 -71.4 -208.9

48 465.5 17.8 63.6 76.1 275.0

49 440.1 -17.8 -63.6 -76.1 -275.0

50 1 (Seismic) + FF/BF LL-1 (Seismic) + 474.4 17.8 65.5 76.3 342.1
Water Current (Normal)

51 1 (Seismic) + FF/BF LL-1 (Seismic) + 449.0 -17.8 -61.6 -76.0 -207.9







Water Current (Skew)


253
t t t tm tm





254
t t t tm tm
Longitudinal Seismic Load Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQL (+ve) + CF-

66 489.6 59.2 20.6 253.9 148.6
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQL (-ve) + CF-

67 464.1 -59.2 -17.5 -253.6 -16.4

68 483.0 59.2 20.5 258.5 132.3

69 457.5 -59.2 -17.6 -249.0 -32.7

70 489.6 59.2 20.6 258.5 148.6

71 464.1 -59.2 -17.5 -249.0 -16.4

72 465.5 59.2 19.1 253.8 82.5

73 440.1 -59.2 -19.1 -253.8 -82.5






255
t t t tm tm









Vertical Seismic Load Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQV (+ve) + CF-

90 519.2 17.8 20.6 76.3 148.6
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQV (-ve) + CF-

91 434.5 -17.8 -17.5 -76.0 -16.4

92 512.6 17.8 20.5 80.9 132.3

93 427.9 -17.8 -17.6 -71.4 -32.7

94 519.2 17.8 20.6 80.9 148.6
256
t t t tm tm

95 434.5 -17.8 -17.5 -71.4 -16.4

96 495.2 17.8 19.1 76.1 82.5

97 410.4 -17.8 -19.1 -76.1 -82.5

257
t t t tm tm
105 Min. Axial Load case 395.3 -17.8 -18.6 -76.1 -81.5
258
t t t tm tm
Summary of Forces
Load Case Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
t t t t-m t-m
Governing Values for Basic Combinations
Governing Values for Basic Combinations (Wind Case)
Governing Values for Seismic Combinations
Governing Values for Accidental Combinations
Governing Values for Ultimate Limit State
1 Governing Max. Axial load case 636.93 40.15 0.00 159.68 430.66
2 Governing Max. Long. Moment case 467.81 59.71 21.12 259.48 133.48
3 Governing Max. Trans. Moment case 604.02 45.23 16.24 215.63 504.96
4 Governing Max. Trans. Moment case 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
259
7 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
t t t tm tm
Basic Loads
0 No Loads 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dead Loads
1a DL 270.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1b SIDL 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1c Wearing Coat 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
1d Span Dislodged 199.0 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.0
2 Live Load
4 Wind Loads
6 Longitudinal Forces Due to Friction / Braking (DL & LL)
260
t t t tm tm
7 Temperature and Shrinkage
7a Thermal Loads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7b Shrinkage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8a Normal Current -15.15 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.97
8b Skew Current -15.15 0.46 0.61 0.94 1.20
Load Combinations
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Rare Combination (Normal Case)
1 456.1 26.8 0.0 106.5 287.1
LL-1

2 422.5 21.6 0.0 109.2 208.3
LL-2

3 456.1 26.8 0.0 129.6 287.1
LL-3

4 333.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL-4

5 441.0 26.8 0.4 106.5 288.1

6 407.3 21.6 0.4 109.2 209.3

7 441.0 26.8 0.4 129.6 288.1

8 318.2 0.0 0.4 0.0 1.0

9 441.0 27.2 0.6 107.4 288.3

10 407.3 22.1 0.6 110.2 209.5

11 441.0 27.2 0.6 130.5 288.3

12 318.2 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.2
+ DL(One Span Dislodged) + Friction

13 199.0 0.0 0.0 123.0 0.0
Force due to DL

14 183.9 0.0 0.4 123.0 1.0

15 183.9 0.5 0.6 123.9 1.2
261
t t t tm tm
4 Min Axial Load case 183.9 0.0 0.4 123.0 1.0
Rare Combination (Wind Case)

16 440.1 29.8 10.4 120.0 335.8
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

17 406.4 24.7 10.4 122.8 257.1
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

18 440.1 29.8 10.4 143.1 335.8
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

19 317.3 3.1 10.4 13.6 48.7
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
262
t t t tm tm
WL Load -Leading Load, Live Load -Accompanying Loads

28 401.5 25.2 17.4 102.5 296.6
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

29 376.2 21.4 17.4 104.6 237.5
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

30 401.5 25.2 17.4 119.8 296.6
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

31 309.4 5.1 17.4 22.6 81.2
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
WL Load -Leading Load & No Live Load condition

40 309.4 5.1 17.4 22.6 81.2
(Unloaded)
41 294.3 5.1 17.8 22.6 82.2
42 294.3 5.6 18.0 23.6 82.4
263
t t t tm tm
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Quasi Permanent Combination
(Normal Case)
43 DL + SIDL + WC + TEMP 333.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
44 DL + SIDL + WC + Shrinkage 333.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
45 DL + SIDL + WC + TEMP + Shrinkage 333.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
46 DL + SIDL + WC + TEMP + Shrinkage 333.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Summary of Forces
Basic Combinations
1 Governing - Max. Axial Load 456.1 26.8 0.0 106.5 287.1
11 Governing - Max. Long. Moment 441.0 27.2 0.6 130.5 288.3
9 Governing - Max. Trans. Moment 441.0 27.2 0.6 107.4 288.3
4 Governing - Min Axial Load 183.9 0.0 0.4 123.0 1.0
Basic Combinations (Wind Case)
35 Governing - Min Axial Load 294.3 5.1 17.8 22.6 82.2
Quasi-Permanent Combinations
264
8 : SLENDERNESS CHECK AND CHECK FOR SECOND ORDER EFFECTS
Slenderness check as per _IRC 112,Cl.8.3.2- page 74
lx/ly <=2.0 & ly/lx <=2.0 as per eq. 8.1

(e x / h eq) / (e y / b eq ) <=0.20 OR (e y / b eq) / (e x / h eq ) <=0.20 as per eq. 8.2
Type of Bearings Fixed C/S Area of Pier = 1782298 mm2

Effective Length 1.4 l= 2.40 m Clear Height of Pier
b eq = 1782.3 mm h eq = 1000 mm
lex = 3356 mm ley = 3356 mm
Ixx = 1.5E+11 mm4 Iyy = 4.7E+11
A = 1782298 mm2 A = 1782298 mm2
i y =I/A = 288.7 mm i x =I/A = 514.5 mm Radi of gyration
b eq = 1000 mm h eq = 1782.298 mm
lx = 11.6 ly = 6.5
Check for Biaxial Bending
1.0 l x / l y = 1.78 <=2 Condition Satisfied from eq 8.1 IRC 112

ly/lx = 0.56 <=2 Condition Satisfied
2.0 Design Cases Case-1 Case-2 Case-3 Case-4 from eq 8.2 IRC 112
ex = 250.71 314.05 258.33 668.96
ey = 676.1555 694.56 694.56 3.84
(e x /h eq ) /(e y /b eq ) = 0.21 0.25 0.21 97.79

(e y /b eq ) /(e x /h eq ) = 4.81 3.94 4.79 0.01
Hence Check for Biaxial Bending is required
265
Check for Second Order Effect
Second order effect may be ignored og the slenderness ratio is less than l lim
l lim = 20ABC / √n Concrete Grade M30
A = 1/(1+0.2Ф eff )
Ф eff = Ф(∞,t 0 ) M 0Eqp M 0Eqp = First Order BM in Quasi Permanent Combinations
= 1.87 M 0Ed M 0Ed = First Order BM in Design Load Combinations
B = √(1+2ω) 1.16 ω = A s f yd / A c f cd Reinforcement Ratio

C = 1.7-r m 0.7 r m = M 01 /M 02 Moment Ratio
n = N ed / (A c f cd) M 01, M 02 = First Order End Moments at two ends of Member
As per Cl. 11.2.1 IRC-112-2011 initial dimensioning A, B C can be taken as 0.7, 1.1 and 0.7 respectively
N ed = 636.93 621.78 621.7806 253.508

Ac = 1782298 1782298 1782298 1782298
f cd = 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40
n = 0.2667 0.2603 0.2603 0.0106

M 0Eqp = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
M 0Ed = 159.68 195.27 160.63 169.59
Ф eff = 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
A = 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

l lim = 31.52 31.90 31.90 157.99
lx = 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6
Check = Second Order Effects shall be Ignored in x Direction

ly = 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5
Check = Second Order Effects shall be Ignored in y Direction
266
INTERACTION DIAGRAM : (P : MLL) SECTION AT SHAFT BOTTOM
Section Dimensions: Material Properties:

2
D = 1000 mm fck = 30 N/mm
2
As1 B = 2782 mm fyk = 500 N/mm
2
Es = 200000 N/mm
Reinforcement Details :
Dia Spacing Cover From To Y_Cg Remark
Reinf. Nos. Spacing
As3 mm mm mm m m m
As4 2722.3 REINFORCEMENT ACROSSAXIS OF BENDING:
T
As1 20.0 100 50 160 840 1331.15 7 113.3
T = 2782 As2 20.0 100 50 160 840 -1331.1 7 113.3
L REINFORCEMENT ALONG AXIS OF BENDING:
As3 20.0 100 50 60 2722.3 -440 27 102
0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 NONE
As4 20.0 100 50 60 2722.3 440 27 102
As2
2
As tension face (Length) = 8482.3 mm
2
840 5000 As Compression face (Length) = 8482.3 mm
2
L= 1000 As tension face (wiidth) = 2199.11 mm
4500
INTERACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : MuTT) 2
As Compression face (width) = 2199.11 mm
2
NA xu 4000 Total As = 21362.8 mm
= 0.77 %
3500
Pu Mu
xu/D
T Tm 3000 Balance Failure
1E-09 -929.28 1.5E-06 d1 940 mm
Pu ( T )
0.2 446.821 585.55 2500 xu 580.25 mm

0.4 1145 751.787 xu/D 0.58
2000
0.6 1872.68 782.242 Pu 1773.24 T
0.8 2766.23 622.408 1500 Mu 796.675 Tm
1 3545.96 407.78
1.2 3951.5 257.834 1000
1.4 4146.05 185.305 Design axial resistance of section

500
1.6 4256.36 143.882 NRd = 0.45*Ac * fck +0.87* Asc * fy
1.8 4325.95 117.588 0 = 4447.37 Ton
2 4373.21 99.6297 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Max Reinforcement 1464.21 mm2
Mu (Tm) 5564.6 mm2
267
Formula Used In Construction of Intraction Diagram :
Pu = Cc+ Cs
Mu = Mc + Ms
Cc = 0.361*fck*xu*b xu ≤ D
0.447*fck*(1 - 4*g/21)*b *D xu > D
g = 16 / ( 7xu / D - 3 )2
Cs = S ( fsi -fci) Asi
fci = 0 esi ≤ 0
0.447fck esi ≥ 0.002
2
0.447fck [ 2 * (esi / 0.002) -(esi / 0.002) ] otherwise
fsi = -0.87 fy esi ≤ -0.00217

esi* Es esi > -0.00217 esi ≤ 0.00217
0.87 fy esi > 0.00217
Mc = Cc * ( 0.5D - x )
Ms = S Csi * yi
x = 0.416 xu xu ≤ D
(0.5 - 8*g /49)*{D/ (1-4*g/21)} xu > D
x = Centroid of stress blok area from most compressed edge
0.0035 * xu - D/ 2 + yi xu ≤ D
xu
esi =
0.002* 1+ yi - D/14 xu > D
xu -3D/7
268
INTERACTION DIAGRAM : (P : MTT) SECTION AT SHAFT BOTTOM
Section Dimensions: Material Properties:

2
D = 2782.3 mm fck = 30 N/mm
2
As1 B = 1000 mm fyk = 500 N/mm
2
Es = 200000 N/mm
Reinforcement Details :
Dia Spacing Cover From To Y_Cg Remark
Reinf. Nos. Spacing
As3 mm mm mm m m m
As4 940 REINFORCEMENT ACROSSAXIS OF BENDING:
T
As1 20.0 100 50 160 2622.3 440 25 102.6
T = 1000 As2 20.0 100 50 160 2622.3 -440 25 102.6
L REINFORCEMENT ALONG AXIS OF BENDING:
As3 20.0 100 50 60 940 -1331.1 9 110
0.0 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 NONE
As4 20.0 100 50 60 940 1331.15 9 110
As2
2
As tension face (Length) = 2827.43 mm
2
2622.3 5000 As Compression face (Length) = 2827.43 mm
2
L= 2782 As tension face (wiidth) = 7853.98 mm
4500
INTERACTION DIAGRAM (Pu : MuTT) 2
As Compression face (width) = 7853.98 mm
2
NA xu 4000 Total As = 21362.8 mm
= 0.77 %
3500
Pu Mu
xu/D
T Tm 3000 Balance Failure
1E-09 -929.28 4.2E-06 d1 2722.3 mm
Pu ( T )
0.2 151.062 1259.5 2500 xu 1680.43 mm

0.4 1046.32 1810.24 xu/D 0.60
2000
0.6 1942.08 1897.14 Pu 1959.98 T
0.8 2832.26 1549.86 1500 Mu 1894.06 Tm
1 3607.15 1006.3
1.2 3996.23 618.928 1000
1.4 4180.69 434.817

500
1.6 4284.1 331.237
1.8 4348.64 266.325 0
2 4391.94 222.448 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500
Mu (Tm)
269
Formula Used In Construction of Intraction Diagram :
Pu = Cc+ Cs
Mu = Mc + Ms
Cc = 0.361*fck*xu*b xu ≤ D
0.447*fck*(1 - 4*g/21)*b *D xu > D
g = 16 / ( 7xu / D - 3 )2
Cs = S ( fsi -fci) Asi
fci = 0 esi ≤ 0
0.447fck esi ≥ 0.002
2
0.447fck [ 2 * (esi / 0.002) -(esi / 0.002) ] otherwise
fsi = -0.87 fy esi ≤ -0.00217

esi* Es esi > -0.00217 esi ≤ 0.00217
0.87 fy esi > 0.00217
Mc = Cc * ( 0.5D - x )
Ms = S Csi * yi
x = 0.416 xu xu ≤ D
(0.5 - 8*g /49)*{D/ (1-4*g/21)} xu > D
x = Centroid of stress blok area from most compressed edge
0.0035 * xu - D/ 2 + yi xu ≤ D
xu
esi =
0.002* 1+ yi - D/14 xu > D
xu -3D/7
270
Check for Moment of Resistance and Biaxial Bending
Design Axial Longi. Transv. Moment of Resistance from

Sr.No Combina Load Moment Moment Interaction Curve (ML/MRL)α +
Load Case NED/NRD α Status
. tions (MT/MRT)α
NED ML MT MRL MRT
1 Pmax 636.93 159.68 430.66 630.82 1558.39 0.143 1.04 0.505 OK
2 MLmax 621.78 195.27 431.86 627.21 1549.07 0.140 1.03 0.567 OK

Basic
3 Mtmax 621.78 160.63 431.86 627.21 1549.07 0.140 1.03 0.512 OK
4 Pmin 253.51 169.59 0.97 503.29 1322.52 0.057 0.57 0.554 OK
5 Pmax 619.17 180.04 503.76 626.59 1547.47 0.139 1.03 0.590 OK
6 MLmax 604.02 215.63 504.96 622.98 1538.15 0.136 1.03 0.653 OK

Wind
7 Mtmax 604.02 180.98 504.96 622.98 1538.15 0.136 1.03 0.598 OK
8 Pmin 408.05 33.93 122.80 569.05 1417.59 0.092 0.92 0.181 OK
9 Pmax 519.22 76.28 148.64 602.79 1485.98 0.117 1.01 0.220 OK
10 MLmax 467.81 259.48 133.48 590.55 1454.36 0.105 1.00 0.529 OK

Seismic
11 Mtmax 474.41 77.23 342.35 592.12 1458.41 0.107 1.01 0.362 OK
12 Pmin 395.28 76.13 81.53 563.62 1409.74 0.089 0.89 0.248 OK
271
10 : DESIGN OF PIER SHAFT - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
Load Case Factor P ML MT
Combinations
Max. Axial Load 1.00 456.1 106.5 287.1
Max. Long. Moment 1.00 441.0 130.5 288.3

Rare
Max. Trans. Moment 1.00 441.0 107.4 288.3
Min. Axial Load 1.00 183.9 123.0 1.0

Combinations
Max. Axial Load 1.00 440.1 120.0 335.8

(Wind)
Max. Long. Moment 1.00 424.9 144.1 337.0

Rare
Max. Trans. Moment 1.00 424.9 121.0 337.0
Min. Axial Load 1.00 294.3 22.6 82.2
Max. Axial Load 1.00 333.4 0.0 0.0
Max. Long. Moment 1.00 333.4 0.0 0.0

0
Max. Trans. Moment 1.00 333.4 0.0 0.0
Min. Axial Load 1.00 333.4 0.0 0.0
Pier Size L transv = 1000.0 mm

B long = 2782.3 mm
% of Steel Provided = 0.768 %
Clear cover = 50 mm
Bar Dia = 20 mm
Link dia = 12 mm
Effective cover = 72.0 mm
2
Total Ast = 21363 mm
Nos = 27.0
Grade of Concrete = M 30
Grade of steel = Fe 500
f cm = 40
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc. E cm = 31.19 GPa
= 31186.6 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of steel = 2.0E+05 MPa
272
273
Calculation of Stress for Servicibility Limit State
Permissible Stresses Normal Wind

Rare Combinations Concrete 0.48fck = 14.40 19.15
Steel 0.6Fy = 300.00 399.00
Quasipermanent Combinations Concrete 0.36fck = 10.80
Steel 0.6Fy = 300.00
Dimensions, m Along X-Dir, One Side Along Y-Dir, One Side
Length Thicnkess Eff. Cover Bar Nos Bar Dia Eff. Cover Bar Nos Bar Dia
2.782 1.000 0.072 27 0.020 0.072 7 0.020
Load Forces Modular Concrete and Steel Stresses, MPa

Comb P, t ML, t-m MT, t-m Ratio Concrete, σc Steel, σsc Steel, σst
Combinations
456 106 287 6.41 6.28 35.96 -25.55

441 130 288 6.41 10.42 57.05 -82.39
Rare
441 107 288 6.41 10.42 57.05 -82.39

184 123 1 6.41 5.68 28.00 -72.77
Combinations
440 120 336 6.41 8.36 47.15 -49.26

(Wind)
425 144 337 6.41 12.94 70.18 -118.47

Rare
425 121 337 6.41 11.17 61.55 -92.86

294 23 82 6.41 2.51 15.25 -1.99
Combinations
Quasiperman
333 0 0 18.40 1.09 20.12 0.00

333 0 0 18.40 1.09 20.12 0.00
ent
333 0 0 18.40 1.09 20.12 0.00

333 0 0 18.40 1.09 20.12 0.00
274
Horizontal reinforcement (Cl. 16.2.3 IRC:112-2011)
8 mm dia 200 c/c
Transverse Reinforcement (Cl. 16.3.3 IRC:112-2011)
2
Area of Vertical Reinforcement on two face 16965 mm
2
0.02Ac 55646 mm
<0.02Ac, Transverse Reinforcement is not required
Diameter of Transverse Reinforcement 10 mm OK
Spacing of Transverse Reinforcement shall be minimum of followng
240 mm
1000 mm
200 mm
Spacing of Main Reinforcement 148 mm
Provide 10 dia @ 200 mm OK
275
11 : DESIGN PIER CAP - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE Skew angle 0.00
Impact Factor 1.184
1.45 1.55 cosq sinq
3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.000 0.000
LHS Concrete Density 2.5 t/m3
B3 B2 B1
2.61
A3 A2 A1
RHS
Plan of Pier Cap 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
0.85 RHS Inner Brg. RHS Outer Brg Arrester width = 0.50
0.85
0.3
1.39 0.00 3.00 0.60

2.94 1.05 (0.85/2+0.125+0.5)/1
7.985/2-1.05 0.97
1.25 1.25
1.13 0.65
0.00 Critical Section for Shear
Critical Section for Shear

2.60
2.78 m
Critical section for Bending C/S Area of Pier = 2.782 mm2
CL of Pier
Load factors ULS Serviceability Limit State
Permanent Loads (DL & SIDL) Rare comb Quasipermanent

Adding to the effect of Variable loads 1.35 1.0 1.00
Relieving to the effect of Variable loads 1.00 - -
Wearing coat 1.75 1.2 1.20
Variable Loads
Live Load 1.50 1.0 0.0
Working Forces on Bearing 46 69 92 115 178 201 224 247
P LHS P RHS e B1 B2 B3 B4 A1 A2 A3 A4
Girder + Diaph. 50.4 50.4 16.8 16.8 16.8 0.0 16.8 16.8 16.8 0.0
Slab 50.1 50.1 16.7 16.7 16.7 0.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 0.0
SIDL 21.5 21.5 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.0 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.0
WC 10.57 10.57 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0
LL 1 60.3 59.3 143.55 39.2 20.1 -18.2 0.0 34.0 19.8 -18.5 0.0
2 59.3 27.5 104.16 34.4 19.8 -8.0 1.0 20.8 9.2 -18.6 0.0
3 60.3 59.3 143.55 42.0 20.1 -18.2 2.0 34.0 19.8 -18.5 0.0
4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inner Brg. Outer Brg.
LHS(t) RHS(t) LHS(t) RHS(t)
LL-Case 1 23.8 23.4 46.5 40.2
LL-Case 2 23.4 10.9 40.7 24.6
LL-Case 3 23.8 23.4 49.7 40.2
LL-Case 4 0.0 0.0 3.6 0.0
Inner Brg. LHS(t) RHS(t) Outer Brg. LHS(t) RHS(t)
WC 3.5 3.5 WC 3.5 3.5
SIDL 7.2 7.2 SIDL 7.2 7.2
Slab Loads 16.7 16.7 Slab Loads 16.7 16.7
DL of girder 16.8 16.8 DL of girder 16.8 16.8
276
Total Bearing Reactions Eccentricity LHS = 0.750 RHS = -0.750
Inner Brg LHS(t) RHS(t) Torsion Outer Brg. LHS(t) RHS(t) Torsion
Total Load - 1 96.8 96.2 0.4 Total Load - 1 130.8 121.4 0.4
Torsion due to BR force
BF (t) T (tm)
Case 1 40.1 62.2
Case 2 32.4 50.3
Case 3 40.1 62.2
Case 4 0.0 0.0
Torsion due to Int. Girder + Ext. Girder + BR Force
LL case Torsion
Case 1 62.7
Case 2 64.4
Case 3 62.7
Case 4 0.0
The Critical Section for Bending is at the face of pier

Factored DL of piercap = 23.55 t 10.19 at Critical Section
Factored BM- DL of piercap = 27.57 tm
Summary, Transverse moment Straight span Skew span
Case MT Ext MT Int. Torsion Mteq Total MT ML(tm) MT (tm) ML(tm) MT (tm) MT Equiv. Total MT
Case 1 391.3 0.0 62.7 49.925 468.754 62.7 418.8 62.7 418.8 49.9 496.3
Case 2 341.4 0.0 64.4 51.294 420.284 64.4 369.0 64.4 369.0 51.3 447.9
Case 3 398.8 0.0 62.7 49.925 476.33 62.7 426.4 62.7 426.4 49.9 503.9
Case 4 197.9 0.0 0.0 0 225.429 0.0 225.4 0.0 225.4 0.0 253.0
Reference
Design for Moment ULS Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 IRC 112-2011
Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 30 30 30 30
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500 500 500 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05
Mean value of Conc.

f A
Cube Comp. Strength

f cm 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Eq. A2- 1
d 1 − 
yd s
 2hof bd 
Secant Modulus
 f Elasticity
cd of Conc., mpa E cm 31186.6 31186.6 31186.6 31186.6 Eq. A2- 5
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(with creep) E c, eff 10868.4 10868.4 10868.4 10868.4 Cl. 12.4.2 (2)
Effective Modular ratio a e = E s / E c,eff 18.40 18.40 18.40 18.40 Eq. 12.15
Creep coefficient f 1.87 1.87 1.87 1.87 Cl. 6.4.2.7
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 Cl. 6.2.2. Notes(1)
Concrete gm 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 Cl. 6.2.2
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Ultimate compressive strain Concrete e cu3 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 (Eq.A2-33)
Steel es 0.00217 0.00217 0.00217 0.00217 (Eq.A2-35)
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40 Cl. 6.4.2.2
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
Factored design Moment, tm Mu 418.8 369.0 426.4 225.4
T ED 62.7 64.4 62.7 0.0
Width of the cap, mm b 2610 2610 2610 2610
Depth of cap, mm D 1250 1250 1250 1250
Area of Cross Section Ac 3262500 3262500 3262500 3262500
Outer Permeter u 7720 7720 7720 7720 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Effective Wall Thickness t ef 423 423 423 423 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Area enclosed by centerlines of connecting walls Ak 1809844 1809844 1809844 1809844 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Perimeter of Area Ak uk 6030 6030 6030 6030 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Longitudinal Reinf required to resist Torsion T ED .uk.cotθ / (2A k f yd ) A sl 6002 6167 6002 0 (Eq. 10.49)
2
Ast Required A st = 0.5f ck bd/f yk (1-(sqrt(1-4.6M/f ck bd ) A s req 8773 7681 8941 4611
Total Area of Steel Required A st req 14776 13848 14943 4611
277
Tension Reinforcement No. of Layers of Reinforcement 2 2 2 2
No. of bars in each layer 26 26 26 26
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 20 20 20 20
Area of Steel provided, mm2 A sl 16336 16336 16336 16336
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Clear cover, mm C 50 50 50 50
Effective depth, mm deff 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0
X umax / d = 0.0035 / (0.0055 + 0.87 fy / Es) 0.456 0.456 0.456 0.456
Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Q lim =0.36 f ck X umax /d (1-0.42*Xu max/ d) 3.982 3.982 3.982 3.982 ``
Effective depth required d req =Sqrt (Mu lim / Q lim b) 634.8 595.9 640.5 465.7
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Compression Reinforcement No. of bars 26 26 26 26
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 2939.0 2939.0 2939.0 2939.0
Effective cover, mm d' 56.0 56.0 56.0 56.0
Max. depth of Neutral Axis Xumax / d = 0.0035 / (0.0055 + 0.87 fy / Es) 526.3 526.3 526.3 526.3
Depth of Neutral axis, mm, ytop x =(A sl f yd )/( l η b f cd ) 253.9 253.9 253.9 253.9
Lever arm z, mm underreinf underreinf underreinf underreinf
1052.5 1052.5 1052.5 1052.5
Moment of Resistance, Mr,tm Mr =A sl .f yd .z 747.5 747.5 747.5 747.5
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Minimum Reinforcement F ctm 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Asmin = 0.26*fctm/fyk.b t d 3916 3916 3916 3916 Cl. 16.5.1.1
Asmin = 0.0013.b t d 3916 3916 3916 3916 Cl. 16.5.1.1
Safe Safe Safe Safe

Maximum Reinforcement 0.025Ac for Tension Reinforcement 81563 81563 81563 81563 Cl. 16.5.1.1
Safe Safe Safe Safe
0.04Ac for Total of Tension and Compression Reinfrocement 130500 130500 130500 130500 Cl. 16.5.1.1
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Design for Shear ULS at face of pedestal Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
Shear force due to superstructure, t V 262.4 230.3 267.3 137.7
Torsion, tm T ED 62.7 64.4 62.7 0.0
Shear Stress due to Torsional Momen T ED / (2A k t ef ) tt 0.41 0.42 0.41 0.00 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Design Torsional Shear Force V EDi 21.6 22.2 21.6 0.0 Cl. 10.5.2.1
Total Design Shear Force, t V ED 284.0 252.5 288.9 137.7
Shear Resistance WithoutShear Reinforcement, t V Rd.c 104.3 104.3 104.3 104.3
Shear Resistance With Shear Reinforcement, t V Rd.s 489.1 489.1 489.1 489.1
Safe Safe Safe Safe
Shear Resistance of Concrete, t Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 16336.3 16336.3 16336.3 16336.3
Width of the cap, mm bw 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0
Effective depth, mm d 889 889 889 889
f ck 30 30 30 30
f yk 500 500 500 500
K =1 + √(200/d) < = 2 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47 Eq. 10.2
Strength reduction factor shear n min = 0.031 k 3/2 f ck 1/2 0.304 0.304 0.304 0.304 Eq. 10.3
Axial force in structure, t N ED 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Cl.10.3.2
Conc.comp.stress at CG axis s cp =N ED / A c < 0.2 f cd 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Cl.10.3.2
0.2 f cd 2.680 2.680 2.680 2.680
Reinforcement ratio ρ1 =A sl / b w d < 0.02 0.0070 0.0070 0.0070 0.0070 Cl.10.3.1, fig 10.5
V Rd.c =[0.12 K (80 ρ 1 f ck ) 0.33 +0.15 σ cp ] b w d 104.3 104.3 104.3 104.3 Cl.10.3.2(2)
V Rd.Cmin =(v min + 0.15 σ cp ) b w d 70.5 70.5 70.5 70.5 Eq. 10.1
V Rd,C 104.3 104.3 104.3 104.3
Shear Strriup requirement Yes Yes Yes Yes
278
Shear Resistance With Vertical Shear Reinforcement Cl.10.3.3
Dia of Shear Reinforcement, mm 12 12 12 12
Number of Legs 4 4 4 4
+ Dia of Shear Reinforcement(Outer Ring), mm 16 16 16 16
Number of Legs 2 2 2 2
Area of Shear reinforcement, mm2 A sw 854.5 854.5 854.5 854.5
Lever arm, mm z 1052.5 1052.5 1052.5 1052.5
Design yield strength of shear reinforcement f ywd 435.0 435.0 435.0 435.0
Angle of Inclinations of conc. Comp. truss with axis of reinf. q 21.8 21.8 21.8 21.8 Cl 10.2.2.2(1), fig. 10.2(a)
cot q 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
tan q 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40
Spacing of Stirrups s 200 200 200 200
Coeff. for state of stress in comp. chord. a cw 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Strength reduction factor for conc.cracked in shear n1 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60
Eq. 10.7
V Rd.S = A sw z f ywd Cot q / S 489.1 489.1 489.1 489.1 Eq. 10.8
V Rd,Max =a cw b w z n 1 f cd / (cot q +tan q ) 762 762 762 762
Shear Resistance with Shear Reinforcement V Rd,S 489.1 489.05 489.05 489.05 Cl 10.3.3.5
Check, Minimum Shear Reinforcement ratio Cl 10.2.2.2(1), fig. 10.2(a)
a 90 90 90 90 Cl 10.3.1,
rW 0.00164 0.00164 0.00164 0.00164 Eq. 10.20
r min 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079 0.00079
safe safe safe safe
Check for Torsional Resistance Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Torsional Moment T ED 62.7 64.4 62.7 0.0
Design Shear Force V ED 262.4 230.3 267.3 137.7
TRd.max=2ναcwfcdAktefsinθcosθ T Rd.max 383 383 383 383 (Eq. 10.48)
ν 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54
sinθ 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37
cosθ 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
V Rd,Max =a cw b w z n 1 f cd / (cot q +tan q ) V Rd.max 762 762 762 762
T Ed /T Rdmax +V Ed /V Rdmax <=1 0.508 0.470 0.515 0.181 (Eq. 10.47)
safe safe safe safe
279
12 : DESIGN PIER CAP - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE Skew angle 0.00
Impact Factor 1.184
1.45 1.55 cosq sinq
1.000 0.000
3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 Concrete Density 2.5
LHS
B3 B2 B1
2.61
A3 A2 A1
RHS
3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00
Plan of Pier Cap
RHS Inner Brg. RHS Outer Brg Arrester = 0.50
0.85 0.85
0.3
1.39 0.00 3.00 0.60

2.94 1.05
0.97
1.25 1.25
1.13 0.65
0.00 Critical Section for Shear
Critical Section for Shear

2.60
2.78 m
Critical section for Bending
CL of Pier
Load factors Serviceability Limit State
Permanent Loads (DL & SIDL) Rare comb Quasipermanent

Adding to the effect of Variable loads 1.0 1.00
Relieving to the effect of Variable loads - -
Wearing coat 1.2 1.20
Variable Loads
Live Load 1.0 0.0
Working Forces on Bearing

P LHS P RHS e B1 B2 B3 B4 A1 A2 A3 A4
DL-Girder 50.4 50.4 16.8 16.8 16.8 0.0 16.8 16.8 16.8 0.0
Slab 50.1 50.1 16.7 16.7 16.7 0.0 16.7 16.7 16.7 0.0
SIDL 21.5 21.5 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.0 7.2 7.2 7.2 0.0
WC 10.6 10.6 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0.0
LL 1 60.3 59.3 2.40 39.2 20.1 -18.2 0.0 34.0 19.8 -18.5 0.0
2 59.3 27.5 2.40 34.4 19.8 -8.0 1.0 20.8 9.2 -18.6 0.0
3 60.3 59.3 2.40 42.0 20.1 -18.2 2.0 34.0 19.8 -18.5 0.0
4 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inner Brg. Outer Brg.
LHS(t) RHS(t) LHS(t) RHS(t)
LL-Case 1 23.8 23.4 46.5 40.2
LL-Case 2 23.4 10.9 40.7 24.6
LL-Case 3 23.8 23.4 49.7 40.2
LL-Case 4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Inner Brg. LHS(t) RHS(t) Outer Brg. LHS(t) RHS(t)
WC 3.5 3.5 WC 3.5 3.5
SIDL 7.2 7.2 SIDL 7.2 7.2
Slab Loads 16.7 16.7 Slab Loads 16.7 16.7
DL of girder 16.8 16.8 DL of girder 16.8 16.8
280
Rare combination Eccentricity LHS = 0.75 RHS = -0.75
Torsion Mom due to braking
BR (t) T (tm)
Case1 26.8 41.5
Case2 21.6 33.5
Case3 26.8 41.5
Case4 0.0 0.0
Total Torsion - INT Girder + Ext. Girder +Braking
LL case Torsion
Case 1 46.5
Case 2 55.0
Case 3 48.9
Case 4 0.0

Factored DL of piercap = 15.70 t
M(RARE)
Summary Straight span Skew span
Case 1 273.8 0.0 46.5 40.414 332.275 46.5 291.9 46.5 291.9 37.0 328.9
Case 2 240.6 0.0 55.0 47.833 306.468 55.0 258.6 55.0 258.6 43.8 302.4
Case 3 278.9 0.0 48.9 42.538 339.45 48.9 296.9 48.9 296.9 39.0 335.9
Case 4 139.4 0.0 0.0 0 157.419 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4
Calculation of Stresses for Short Term Loading Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
Design Constants Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 30 30 30 30
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500 500 500 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05 2E+05
Mean value of Conc. Cube Comp. Strength f cm 40 40 40 40
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., mpa E cm 31186.6 31186.6 31186.6 31186.6
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(with creep) E c, eff 11367.6 11367.6 11367.6 11367.6
Effective Modular ratio a e = E s / E c,eff 17.59 17.59 17.59 17.59
Creep coefficient f 1.74 1.74 1.74 1.74
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
Concrete gm 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Ultimate compressive strain Concrete e cu3 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035
Steel es 0.00217 0.00217 0.00217 0.00217
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 13.4 13.4 13.4 13.4
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.8 434.8 434.8 434.8
Factored design Moment SLS, tm M(ST) = M(RARE)-M(QP) M 134.4 101.2 139.5 0.0
Width of the cap, mm b or bw 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0
Depth of cap, mm D 1250.0 1250.0 1250.0 1250.0
Tension Reinforcement No. of Layers of Bars 2 2 2 2
No. of bars 26 26 26 26
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 16336 16336 16336 16336
Clear cover, mm C 50 50 50 50
Effective depth, mm deff 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0
281
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 2941 2941 2941 2941
Depth of Extreme Fibre Tension Reinforcement, mm, ybot Ybot 900.14 900.14 900.14 900.14
Moment of inertia of Uncracked section, mm4 I uncracked 4.2E+11 4.2E+11 4.2E+11 4.2E+11
Tensile Stress in concrete fctm 1.98 1.49 2.05 0.00
Permissible tensile stress of concrete fctm, p 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Uncraked Uncraked Uncraked Uncraked
Check of Stresses Assuming Short Term Creep and Elastic Modulus
Depth of concrete compression
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 266.9 266.9 266.9 266.9
Icr = As(d-dc) 2 + bdc 3 Eceff/3Es 1.54E+10 1.54E+10 1.54E+10 1.54E+10
Section Modulus, mm3 Ztop 5.78E+07 5.78E+07 5.78E+07 5.78E+07
Section Modulus, mm3 Zbot 1.74E+07 1.74E+07 1.74E+07 1.74E+07
Compressive Stresses at top s c top 3.62 2.73 3.76 0.00
Permissible stress 0.48*fck 14.40 14.40 14.40 14.40
safe safe safe safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel 77.27 58.17 80.17 0.00
Permissible stress 0.6*fyk 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
safe safe safe safe
Quasipermanent Combinations Eccentricity LHS = 0.75 RHS = -0.75

Torsion Mom due to braking
BR (t) T (tm)
Case1 0.0 0.0
Case2 0.0 0.0
Case3 0.0 0.0
Case4 0.0 0.0
Total Torsion - INT Girder + Ext. Girder +Braking
LL case Torsion
Case 1 0.0
Case 2 0.0
Case 3 0.0
Case 4 0.0
Factored DL of piercap = 15.70 t
M(QP) bavg. = 2610 D= 925
Summary Straight span Skew span
Case 1 139.4 0.0 0.0 0 157.419 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4
Case 2 139.4 0.0 0.0 0 157.419 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4
Case 3 139.4 0.0 0.0 0 157.419 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4
Case 4 139.4 0.0 0.0 0 157.419 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4 0.0 157.4
282
Calculation of Stresses for Quasipermanent Loading Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4
Factored design Moment, tm M(QP) M 157.4 157.4 157.4 157.4
Width of the cap, mm b or bw 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0 2610.0
Depth of cap, mm D 1250.0 1250.0 1250.0 1250.0
Tension Reinforcement No. of bars 26 26 26 26
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 16336.3 16336.3 16336.3 16336.3
Clear cover, mm C 50.0 50.0 50.0 50.0
d eff 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0 1154.0
Area of Steel, mm2 A sc 2940.5 2940.5 2940.5 2940.5
Moment of inertia of Uncracked section, mm4 I uncracked 4.2E+11 4.2E+11 4.2E+11 4.2E+11
Tensile Stress in concrete f ctm 2.22 2.22 2.22 2.22
Permissible tensile stress of concrete f ctm, n 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
Cracked Status Uncraked Uncraked Uncraked Uncraked
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 405.9 405.9 405.9 405.9
Icr = As(d-dc) 2 + bdc 3 Eceff/3Es 1.24E+10 1.24E+10 1.24E+10 1.24E+10
Depth of Extreme Fibre Tension Reinforcement, mm, ybot 748.09 748.09 748.09 748.09
Section Modulus, mm3 Z top 3.07E+07 30670763 30670763 30670763
Section Modulus, mm3 Z bot 16641723 16641723 16641723 16641723
Permissible stress in Concrete 0.36*f ck 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8
safe safe safe safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel ss 94.6 94.6 94.6 94.6
Permissible stress in Steel 0.6f yk 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
safe safe safe safe
Stress Check for Rare Combinations Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Permissible stress in Concrete 0.48*f ck 14.4 14.4 14.4 14.4
safe safe safe safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel ss 171.9 152.8 174.8 94.6
Permissible stress in Steel 0.6f yk 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
safe safe safe safe
Crack Width Check Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4

Tensile stress at level of steel ss 94.59 94.59 94.59 94.59
Factor depending on duration of load Kt 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
h 1250 1250 1250 1250
h c,eff 240.0 240.0 240.0 240.0
A c,eff 626400.0 626400.0 626400.0 626400.0
r P,eff 0.026 0.026 0.026 0.026
f ct, eff 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50
[ s sc -K t *f ct,eff / r p,eff (1+ a e r p , eff )] / E s >=[0.6* s sc / E S ] 0.00012 0.00012 0.00012 0.00012
[0.6* s sc /E S ] 0.00023 0.00017 0.00024 0.00000
(esm-ecm) 0.00023 0.00017 0.00024 0.00012
Spacing of Reinforcement
S 98 98 98 98
For Bonded Reinforcement within tension zone If S < CP
Cover Parameter for SR,Max, mm CP 300.0 300.0 300.0 300.0
k1 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.80
k2 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
Max crack spacing S r,Max 300.4 300.4 300.4 300.4
For Deformed Bar associated with pure bending If S > CP
S r,Max 300.4 300.4 300.4 300.4
Crack width W K = S r,max ( εsm – ε cm ) 0.070 0.060 0.060 0.030
Crack width permissible W K , PER 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30
safe safe safe safe
283
14 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF FOOTING - ULTIMATE LIMIT STATE
t t t tm tm
Basic Loads
0 No Loads 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dead Loads
1a DL -(incld.footing, soil ) 416.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1b SIDL 38.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1c Wearing coat 21.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2 Live Load
3 Seismic Loads (35% Higher as per Ammendment 2, August 2014)
4 Wind Loads
7a Normal Current -62.24 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.25
7b Skew Current -62.24 0.63 0.87 1.09 1.46
284
t t t tm tm
Combination of Loads as per table 3.4 IRC 6 - 2014
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Combination (2) (Normal Case) as per table 3.4 IRC 6 -2014
1 834.5 40.1 0.0 219.9 430.7
LL-1

2 784.0 32.4 0.0 212.5 312.5
LL-2

3 834.5 40.1 0.0 254.5 430.7
LL-3

4 650.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL-4

5 772.2 40.1 0.7 219.9 431.9

6 721.8 32.4 0.7 212.5 313.7

7 772.2 40.1 0.7 254.5 431.9

8 588.1 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2

9 772.2 40.8 0.9 221.0 432.1

10 721.8 33.1 0.9 213.6 314.0

11 772.2 40.8 0.9 255.6 432.1

12 588.1 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5

13 466.2 0.0 0.0 169.6 0.0
Force due to DL

14 404.0 0.0 0.7 169.6 1.2

15 404.0 0.6 0.9 170.7 1.5
1 Governing - Max. Axial load 834.5 40.1 0.0 219.9 430.7

9 Governing - Max. Trans. moment 772.2 40.8 0.9 221.0 432.1
14 Governing - Min. Axial Load 404.0 0.0 0.7 169.6 1.2
Combination (2) (Wind Case) as per table 3.4 IRC 6 -2014

16 816.7 44.8 15.6 247.2 527.2
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

17 766.2 37.1 15.6 239.8 409.0
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2
285
t t t tm tm

18 816.7 44.8 15.6 281.8 527.2
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

19 632.6 4.6 15.6 27.3 96.5
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)
Wind Load -Leading Load, Live Load -Accompanying Loads

28 761.9 38.5 26.1 214.1 491.1
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

29 723.2 32.6 26.1 208.4 400.5
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

30 761.9 38.5 26.1 240.6 491.1
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

31 620.7 7.7 26.1 45.5 160.9
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)
(Normal)
286
t t t tm tm
(Normal)
(Normal)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
(Skew)
Wind Load -Leading Load & No LL condition

40 620.7 7.7 26.1 45.5 160.9
(Unloaded)

41 558.5 7.7 26.8 45.5 162.2

42 558.5 8.3 26.9 46.6 162.4

Seismic Comb. (4) -as per table 3.4 IRC 6 -2014
EQ Load -Leading Load during service, Live Load -Accompanying Loads
Transverse Seismic Combination

43 691.5 24.0 87.4 151.5 613.5
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQT (-ve + CF-

44 657.2 -24.0 -84.2 -151.2 -476.6

45 684.9 24.0 87.2 156.1 597.0

46 650.6 -24.0 -84.3 -146.6 -493.1

47 691.5 24.0 87.4 156.1 613.5
287
t t t tm tm

48 657.2 -24.0 -84.2 -146.6 -476.6

49 667.5 24.0 85.8 151.4 545.0

50 633.2 -24.0 -85.8 -151.4 -545.0




288
t t t tm tm











Longitudinal Seismic Combination

67 691.5 80.0 27.3 504.7 232.0

68 657.2 -80.0 -24.2 -504.4 -95.0

69 684.9 80.0 27.2 509.3 215.5

70 650.6 -80.0 -24.3 -499.8 -111.6

71 691.5 80.0 27.3 509.3 232.0
289
t t t tm tm

72 657.2 -80.0 -24.2 -499.8 -95.0

73 667.5 80.0 25.7 504.6 163.5

74 633.2 -80.0 -25.7 -504.6 -163.5














290
t t t tm tm


Vertical Seismic Combination

91 731.6 24.0 27.3 151.5 232.0

92 617.2 -24.0 -24.2 -151.2 -95.0

93 725.0 24.0 27.2 156.1 215.5

94 610.6 -24.0 -24.3 -146.6 -111.6

95 731.6 24.0 27.3 156.1 232.0

96 617.2 -24.0 -24.2 -146.6 -95.0

97 707.5 24.0 25.7 151.4 163.5

98 593.1 -24.0 -25.7 -151.4 -163.5






291
t t t tm tm











106 Governing - Min. Axial Load 530.9 -24.0 -25.0 -151.4 -162.3
292
t t t tm tm
Summary of Governing forces
Load Case Vertical Hzl. - X Hzl. - Z ML MT
t t t t-m t-m
293
15 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR DESIGN OF FOOTING - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
t t t tm tm
Basic Loads
0 No Loads 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dead Loads
1b SIDL 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
1c Wearing coat 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
2 Live Load
4 Wind Loads
294
t t t tm tm
7a Normal Current -62.24 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.25
7b Skew Current -62.24 0.63 0.87 1.09 1.46
Combination of Loads as per table 3.4 IRC 6 - 2014
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Combination (2) (Normal Case) as per table 3.4 IRC 6 -2014
1 635.0 34.8 0.0 190.6 373.2
LL-1

2 591.3 28.1 0.0 184.2 270.8
LL-2

3 635.0 34.8 0.0 220.6 373.2
LL-3

4 475.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL-4

5 572.8 34.8 0.7 190.6 374.5

6 529.1 28.1 0.7 184.2 272.1

7 572.8 34.8 0.7 220.6 374.5

8 413.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2

9 572.8 35.4 0.9 191.7 374.7

10 529.1 28.7 0.9 185.3 272.3

11 572.8 35.4 0.9 221.7 374.7

12 413.2 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5
13 345.3 0.0 0.0 130.1 0.0
Force due to DL
14 283.1 0.0 0.7 130.1 1.2
15 283.1 0.6 0.9 131.2 1.5

295
t t t tm tm
Combination (2) (Normal Case) -QUASI PERMANENT
16 DL + SIDL + WC 479.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
DL + SIDL + WC + Water Current

17 417.5 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2
(Normal)
DL + SIDL + WC + Water Current

18 417.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5
(Skew)
19 + DL(One Span Dislodged) 345.3 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.0
+ DL(One Span Dislodged) + Water

19 283.1 0.0 0.7 99.2 1.2
Current (Normal)
+ DL(One Span Dislodged) + Water

20 283.1 0.6 0.9 100.3 1.5
Current (Skew)

Combination (2) (Wind Case) -as per table 3.4 IRC-6-2014

21 619.3 38.9 13.9 214.8 459.1
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

22 575.5 32.2 13.9 208.5 356.6
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

23 619.3 38.9 13.9 244.9 459.1
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

24 459.7 4.1 13.9 24.3 85.8
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)
296
t t t tm tm

(Normal)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)

33 572.6 33.4 22.6 186.0 426.6
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

34 538.9 28.3 22.6 181.1 347.8
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

35 572.6 33.4 22.6 209.1 426.6
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

36 449.8 6.7 22.6 39.4 139.5
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Skew)
297
t t t tm tm

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)

45 449.8 6.7 22.6 39.4 139.5
(Unloaded)

46 387.6 6.7 23.3 39.4 140.7

47 387.6 7.3 23.5 40.5 140.9

298
t t t tm tm
Summary of forces
Governing Values for Basic Combinations (QUASI)
299
13 : LOAD COMBINATIONS FOR CHECKING BASE PRESSURE
t t t tm tm
Basic Loads
0 No Loads 0 0 0 0 0
1 Dead Loads
1b SIDL 38.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
1c Wearing coat 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.00
2 Live Load
3 Seismic Loads
4 Wind Loads
6 Forces Due to Friction / Braking (DL & LL)
300
t t t tm tm
7a Normal Current -62.24 0.00 0.70 0.00 1.25
7b Skew Current -62.24 0.63 0.87 1.09 1.46
Load Combinations for Unfactored Values
1 9 3 4 5 6 7
Basic Combinations

1 598.2 26.8 0.0 146.6 287.1
LL-1

2 564.6 21.6 0.0 141.7 208.3
LL-2

3 598.2 26.8 0.0 169.7 287.1
LL-3

4 475.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL-4

6 536.0 26.8 0.7 146.6 288.4

7 502.3 21.6 0.7 141.7 209.6

8 536.0 26.8 0.7 169.7 288.4

9 413.2 0.0 0.7 0.0 1.2

10 536.0 27.4 0.9 147.7 288.6

11 502.3 22.2 0.9 142.8 209.8

12 536.0 27.4 0.9 170.8 288.6

13 413.2 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5

5 345.3 0.0 0.0 123.0 0.0
Force due to DL

7 283.1 0.0 0.7 123.0 1.2

8 283.1 0.6 0.9 124.1 1.5
301
t t t tm tm
Wind Combinations

14 578.5 31.9 17.4 176.9 394.4
CF-1 + FF/BF LL-1

15 544.8 26.8 17.4 172.0 315.6
CF-2 + FF/BF LL-2

16 578.5 31.9 17.4 200.0 394.4
CF-3 + FF/BF LL-3

17 455.7 5.1 17.4 30.3 107.3
CF-4 + FF/BF LL-4

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Normal)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)

(Skew)
302
t t t tm tm

26 578.5 31.9 17.4 176.9 394.4
FF/BF LL-1

27 544.8 26.8 17.4 172.0 315.6
FF/BF LL-2

28 578.5 31.9 17.4 200.0 394.4
FF/BF LL-3

29 455.7 5.1 17.4 30.3 107.3
FF/BF LL-4

30 516.2 31.9 18.1 176.9 395.6
FF/BF LL-1 + Water Current (Normal)

31 482.6 26.8 18.1 172.0 316.8

32 516.2 31.9 18.1 200.0 395.6

33 393.5 5.1 18.1 30.3 108.5

34 516.2 32.5 18.2 178.0 395.8
FF/BF LL-1 + Water Current (Skew)

35 482.6 27.4 18.2 173.1 317.1

36 516.2 32.5 18.2 201.1 395.8

37 393.5 5.8 18.2 31.4 108.7

38 455.7 5.1 17.4 30.3 107.3
(Unloaded)

39 393.5 5.1 18.1 30.3 108.5

40 393.5 5.8 18.2 31.4 108.7

303
t t t tm tm
Seismic Combinations
Transverse Seismic Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQT (+ve) +

41 508.0 11.8 43.9 68.7 315.4
CF-1 (Seismic) + FF/BF LL-1 (Seismic)

42 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -68.4 -178.4

43 501.4 11.8 43.8 73.3 298.9

44 484.4 -11.8 -40.9 -63.8 -195.0

45 508.0 11.8 43.9 73.3 315.4

46 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -63.8 -178.4

47 483.9 11.8 42.4 68.5 246.9

48 467.0 -11.8 -42.4 -68.5 -246.9

49 CF-1 (Seismic) + FF/BF LL-1 (Seismic) + 445.7 11.8 44.6 68.7 316.6

50 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -68.4 -178.4

51 501.4 11.8 43.8 73.3 298.9

52 484.4 -11.8 -40.9 -63.8 -195.0

53 508.0 11.8 43.9 73.3 315.4

54 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -63.8 -178.4

55 483.9 11.8 42.4 68.5 246.9

56 467.0 -11.8 -42.4 -68.5 -246.9

304
t t t tm tm

58 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -68.4 -178.4

59 501.4 11.8 43.8 73.3 298.9

60 484.4 -11.8 -40.9 -63.8 -195.0

61 508.0 11.8 43.9 73.3 315.4

62 491.0 -11.8 -40.8 -63.8 -178.4

63 483.9 11.8 42.4 68.5 246.9

64 467.0 -11.8 -42.4 -68.5 -246.9
Longitudinal Seismic Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQL (+ve) +

65 508.0 39.5 14.3 228.6 142.5

66 491.0 -39.5 -11.2 -228.3 -5.6

67 501.4 39.5 14.2 233.2 126.0

68 484.4 -39.5 -11.3 -223.7 -22.1

69 508.0 39.5 14.3 233.2 142.5

70 491.0 -39.5 -11.2 -223.7 -5.6

71 483.9 39.5 12.7 228.4 74.1

72 467.0 -39.5 -12.7 -228.4 -74.1

305
t t t tm tm
306
t t t tm tm
Vertical Seismic Combination
DL + SIDL + WC + LL-1 + EQV (+ve) +

89 527.8 11.8 14.3 68.7 142.5

90 471.3 -11.8 -11.2 -68.4 -5.6

91 521.2 11.8 14.2 73.3 126.0

92 464.7 -11.8 -11.3 -63.8 -22.1

93 527.8 11.8 14.3 73.3 142.5

94 471.3 -11.8 -11.2 -63.8 -5.6

95 503.7 11.8 12.7 68.5 74.1

96 447.2 -11.8 -12.7 -68.5 -74.1








307
t t t tm tm








104 Governing - Min. Axial Load 385.0 -11.8 -12.0 -68.5 -72.8
Summary of forces
Governing Values for Wind Combinations
104 Governing - Max. Moment 385.0 11.8 12.0 68.5 72.8
308
13 Calculation for Maximum Load on Pile
Pile length = 20 m
Free length of pile above soil = 0.2 m
Description Weight (t) LA (m) ML (tm)
Pilecap weight = 117.7 0.0 0.0
Uniform Soil on pile Cap = 28.6 0.0 0.0
Approach fill on pile cap = 0.00 0.00 0.00
RE wall weight = 0.00 0.00 0.00
Summary of final loads at base of pilecap including pile cap weight
S No Load Case P (t) HL (t) HT (t) ML (tm) MT (tm) Resultant, H
1 Normal 598.2 26.8 0.0 146.6 287.1 27.8

2 Normal 536.0 27.4 0.9 170.8 288.6 28.5
3 Normal 536.0 27.4 0.9 147.7 288.6 28.5
4 Wind 578.5 31.9 17.4 176.9 394.4 37.4
5 Wind 516.2 32.5 18.2 201.1 395.8 38.4
6 Wind 516.2 32.5 18.2 178.0 395.8 38.4
7 Seismic 527.8 11.8 14.3 68.7 142.5 19.6
8 Seismic 439.1 40.1 15.0 234.3 127.5 43.9
9 Seismic 445.7 12.5 44.8 69.8 316.8 47.6
Providing the following arrangement of piles
Dia of piles = 1.00 m Ø Projection of pilecap beyond pile = 150
Spacing of piles = 3.00 m c/c Std for clayey = 3.00 m c/c
No. of piles = 6 Min for sandy = 2.50 m c/c
309
no of spacing 2
4.30
Compression
0.65
1 Transv. 4
7.30 2 5 3.00 m c/c

Long
3 6
0.65
Tension 3.00
Materials
Concrete Grade for pile = 35
Steel Grade = Fe500
Calculation of Depth of Fixity
Free length of pile above soil = L1 = 19.00 cm
4
I = moment of inertia of pile = = 4908739 cm
2
E= = 311866 Kg/cm
Table 3, As per IS:2911 - 2010
K1-Dry K1-Submer
Soil type N Value
kN/m3 kN/m3
Very Loose Sand 0-4 <0.4 <0.2

Loos Sand 4-10 0.4-2.5 0.2-1.4
Medium Sand 10-35 2.5-7.5 1.4-5.0
>35 7.5-20 5.0-12.0
Dense Sand
3
Value of K1 = = 1 kg/cm
Hence T = = 273.52 cm
L1 / T = = 0.069 L1 / R =
From fig. 4, values of Lf / T or Lf / R
Lf / T or Lf / R = = 2.20
Lf = = 6.02 m
Min Embedded Length of Pile = 10.94 m
Min Length of Pile 11.13 m
Actual pile length = 20.00 m OK
Lf considered = 6.02 m
310
From fig. 5B, values of reduction factor
m = 0.85 Consider fixed head pile
Moments in each pile
Load Case Load MT ML Resultant
1 Normal 0.00 11.77 11.77
2 Normal 0.38 12.04 12.05
3 Normal 0.38 12.04 12.05
4 Wind 7.64 14.03 15.97
5 Wind 8.02 14.30 16.40
6 Wind 8.02 14.30 16.40
7 Seismic 6.27 5.21 8.15
8 Seismic 6.61 17.64 18.84
9 Seismic 19.70 5.48 20.45
Pile No X Y
1 -1.50 3.00
2 -1.50 0.00
3 -1.50 -3.00
4 1.50 3.00
5 1.50 0.00
6 1.50 -3.00
Sx 2
13.50
Sy2 36.00
Vertical Loads on each pile
Load no Pile 1 Pile 2 Pile 3 Pile 4 Pile 5 Pile 6
1 107.3 83.4 59.5 139.9 116.0 92.1
2 94.4 70.4 46.3 132.4 108.3 84.3
3 97.0 72.9 48.9 129.8 105.7 81.7
4 109.6 76.8 43.9 148.9 116.1 83.2
5 96.7 63.7 30.7 141.4 108.4 75.4
6 99.2 66.3 33.3 138.8 105.8 72.8
7 92.2 80.3 68.5 107.5 95.6 83.7
8 57.8 47.2 36.5 109.8 99.2 88.6
9 92.9 66.5 40.1 108.4 82.0 55.6
311
Maximum & Minimum Pile Loads
Selfweight of pile excluding buoyancy = 39.270 t
Axial Load With Self Weight
Max. reqd. Min. reqd.
pile capacity pile capacity
MAX. MIN. Moment Factor
with self with self
weight weight
Normal condition 161.56 46.31 12.05 1.00 200.8 85.6

Wind condition 178.45 25.49 12.33 1.33 173.4 58.4
Seismic condition 133.73 36.54 13.63 1.50 128.4 63.6
Working load on pile
Max load on pile = 161.6 t Safe
Min load on pile = 19.2 t
L = L1 + L f = = 6.21 m
Actual horizontal load on each piles = 4.75 t Safe

Deflection due to horizontal load on piles = 0.62 mm safe
For Pile Design
Condition Max Load Moment Factor Load Moment
Normal 161.56 12.05 1.00 161.6 12.0
Wind 178.45 16.40 1.33 134.2 12.3
Seismic 133.73 20.45 1.50 89.2 13.6
Condition Min Load Moment Factor Load Moment

Normal 46.31 12.05 1.00 46.3 12.0
Wind 25.49 16.40 1.33 19.2 12.3
Seismic 36.54 20.45 1.50 24.4 13.6
312
10 Design of Pile & Pile Cap - ULS
Pile Details Materials
Dia of piles = 1.00 m Grade of Concrete, fck pile cap = M 30
No. of piles = 6 Nos Grade of Steel, fyk = Fe 500
Spacing of piles = 3.00 m c/c
Pile length = 20 m
Free length of pile above soil = 0.2 m Particular Load (t) LA (m) ML (tm)
Pile Cap Details Pilecap weight 117.7
Pilecap Projection, beyond pile = 150 mm Soil wt. on pile Cap 28.6 0.00 0.00
Min. Spacing for clayey Soil, 3 x Dia = 3.00 m c/c Approach fill 0.00 2.15 0.00
Min Spacing in sandy soil, 2.5 X Dia = 2.50 m c/c RE wall weight 0.0 0.00 0.00
Summary of Loads (including Pile Cap & Soil) -

S No Load Case P (t) HL (t) HT (t) ML (tm) MT (tm) Resultant, Factor
H
1 Normal 834.5 40.1 0.0 219.9 430.7 40.3 1.0

2 Normal 772.2 40.8 0.9 255.6 432.1 41.0 1.0
3 Normal 772.2 40.8 0.9 221.0 432.1 41.0 1.0
4 Wind 816.7 44.8 15.6 247.2 527.2 47.6 1.0
5 Wind 754.5 45.4 16.5 282.9 528.7 48.5 1.0
6 Wind 754.5 45.4 16.5 248.3 528.7 48.5 1.0
7 Seismic 731.6 24.0 27.3 151.5 232.0 36.5 1.0
8 Seismic 622.7 80.6 28.1 510.4 216.9 85.5 1.0
9 Seismic 629.3 24.6 88.2 152.6 614.9 91.8 1.0

Free length of pile, L1 = 19.00 cm
4
Moment of inertia of pile, I = 4.91E+06 cm 0.65
2
Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., E = 311866 Kg/cm 1 4
4
Table 3, As per IS:2911 - 2010
K1-Dry K1-Submer
Soil type N Value
kN/m3 kN/m3
Transv.
Very Loose Sand 0-4 <0.4 <0.2
Loos Sand 4-10 0.4-2.5 0.2-1.4
5
Medium Sand 10-35 2.5-7.5 1.4-5.0 2 1.50
>35 7.5-20 5.0-12.0
Dense Sand
Long
3
Value of K1 = 1.00 kg/cm 7.30
Hence, T = 273.52 cm 1.50

Ratio, L1 / T = 0.069
From fig. 4, IS 2911 - 2010 3 6
Lf / T or Lf / R = 2.20
Lf = 6.02 m 0.65
Min Embedded Length of Pile = 10.94 m Tension 3.00
Min Length of Pile = 11.13 m
Actual pile length = = 20.00 m Okay 4.30
Lf considered = = 6.02 m
From fig. 5B, IS 2911 - 2010, Reduction factor
Consider fixed headed pile
m= 0.85
313
Moments in each pile
Load Case Load MT ML Resultant Pile No X Y
1 Normal 0.0 17.7 17.7 1.00 -1.50 3.00

2 Normal 0.4 17.9 17.9 2.00 -1.50 0.00
3 Normal 0.4 17.9 17.9 3.00 -1.50 -3.00
4 Normal 0.3 0.0 0.3 4.00 1.50 3.00
4 Wind 6.9 19.7 20.9 5.00 1.50 0.00
5 Wind 7.3 20.0 21.2 6.00 1.50 -3.00
6 Wind 7.3 20.0 21.2 Sx2 13.50
7 Wind 11.8 3.4 12.2 Sy2 36.00
7 Seismic 12.0 10.6 16.0
8 Seismic 12.3 35.4 37.5
9 Seismic 38.8 10.8 40.3
10 Seismic 11.0 10.6 15.2
Load Case Pile 1 Pile 2 Pile 3 Pile 4 Pile 5 Pile 6 Governing
1 150.5 114.6 78.8 199.4 163.5 127.6 199.4
2 136.3 100.3 64.3 193.1 157.1 121.1 193.1
3 140.2 104.1 68.1 189.3 153.3 117.2 189.3
4 152.6 108.6 64.7 207.5 163.6 119.6 207.5
5 138.4 94.3 50.3 201.2 157.2 113.1 201.2
6 142.2 98.2 54.1 197.4 153.3 109.3 197.4
7 124.4 105.1 85.8 158.1 138.8 119.4 158.1
8 65.1 47.1 29.0 178.6 160.5 142.4 178.6
9 139.2 87.9 36.7 173.1 121.8 70.6 173.1

Max. Reqd. Min. Reqd.
pile pile
MAX. MIN. Moment Factor capacity capacity
with self with self
Condition weight weight
Normal 199.4 64.3 17.9 1.00 238.7 103.6
Wind 207.5 48.6 21.2 1.00 246.8 87.9
Seismic 178.6 29.0 40.3 1.00 217.8 68.3
Max Net Ultimate load on pile = 207.5 t
Min Net Ultimate load on pile = 39.3 t
L = L1 + Lf = 6.21 m
Ultimate Horizontal load on each pile = 15.30 t
Pile Design Forces- for Structural strength
Condition Max Load Moment Factor Load Resultant M P ML MT Resultant H
Normal 199.4 17.9 1.00 199.4 17.9 199.4 17.9 0.4 6.8
Wind 207.5 21.2 1.00 207.5 21.2 207.5 20.0 11.8 8.1
Seismic 178.6 40.3 1.00 178.6 40.3 178.6 35.4 38.8 15.3
Condition Min Load Moment Factor Load Moment P ML MT

Normal 64.3 17.9 1.00 64.3 17.9 64.3 17.9 0.4
Wind 48.6 21.2 1.00 48.6 21.2 48.6 20.0 11.8
Seismic 29.0 40.3 1.00 29.0 40.3 29.0 35.4 38.8
314
1.00
1.415
1.5 0.00 1.50

1.50
0.65 1.50 1.50 0.65
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.50 m

Pile shall be embeded in Pile cap = 50 mm
Clear Cover for Reinforcement = 75 mm
Dia of Rebar Long. Direction = 20 mm Density of Concrete 2.5 t/m2
Dia of Rebar Transverse Direction = 20 mm Density of Soil 2 t/m2
Effe. Depth of pile cap, deff = 1415 mm full scour considered
Height of soil over cap = 0.50 m
Length of Heel = 1.65 m
Length of Toe = 1.65 m
Design of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction
Weight of Pile cap+earth over it = 201.8 t DL Backfill
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap & soil at pier face = 65.2 tm 1.35 1.5
Shear force due to pile cap weight at critical section = 11.3 t
Total Load on Pile in one col, Max of (1+2+3,4+5+6) = 490.8 t
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile = 1.00 m
Bending Moment in Long. Dir. due to Pile = 490.8 tm
Bending Moment per m at crtical section = 67.23 tm/m
Net Bending moment at the face of pier = 425.54 tm Pier face to pile outer dist= 1.5
Total Shear Force at critical section = 41.7 t Section from abutment face = 1.415
Shear force per m at crtical section = 5.7 t/m diff for linear interpolation= 0.085
Net Shear force at critical section = 30.5 t

Design of Pile Cap in Transverse Direction
Weight of Pile cap+earth over it = 201.82 t
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap at face of pier = 71.99 tm
Total Load on Pile in one row, Max of (1+4,3+6) = 360.10 t abutment face to pile outer dist= 2.10705
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile = 1.61 m Section from abutment face = 1.415
Bending Moment in transv.Dir. due to Pile = 579.35 tm diff for linear interpolation= 0.69205
Bending Moment per m at crtical section = 134.73 t-m/m
Net Bending moment at the face of pier = 507.4 tm

Total Shear Force at critical section = 249.2 t
Shear force per m at crtical section = 58.0 t/m
315
Design for Moment ULS Case 1-ML Case 2MT Reference
Design Constants Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 30 30 IRC 112-2011
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2.0E+05 2.0E+05
Mean value of Conc. Cube Comp. Strength f cm 40 40 Eq. A2- 1
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., mpa E cm 31186.6 31186.6 Eq. A2- 5
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(with creep) E c, eff 10868.4 10868.4
Effective Modular ratio ae= E s / E c,eff 18.4 18.4 Cl. 12.4.2 (2), Eq. 12.15
Creep coefficient f 1.87 1.87 Cl. 6.4.2.7
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 1.15 Cl. 6.2.2. Notes(1)
Concrete gm 1.50 1.50 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 0.67 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 0.80 A2.9, Eq A2-33
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 1.00 A2.9, Eq A2-35
Ultimate compressive strain Concrete e cu3 0.0035 0.0035 Table 6.5
Steel es 0.00217 0.00217 cl.6.2.2
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 13.40 13.40 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.78 434.78 cl.6.2.2
Factored design Moment, tm Mu 425.5 507.36
Width of the cap, mm b 7300.0 4300
Depth of cap, mm D 1500.0 1500.0
Tension Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 100 100
Dia. of Rebars, mm f 20 20
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 22934 13509
Clear cover, mm C 75 75
Effective depth, mm deff 1415.0 1415.0
X umax / d = 0.0035 / (0.0055 + 0.87 fy / Es) 0.456 0.456
Case 1-ML Case 2MT

Q lim =0.36 f ck X umax /d (1-0.42*Xu max/ d) 3.982 3.982
Effective depth required d req =Sqrt (Mu lim / Q lim b) 382.6 544.4
Safe Safe
Compression Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 100 100
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 11304.0 11304.0
Effective cover, mm d' 81.0 81.0
Depth of Neutral axis, mm, ytop x =(A sl f yd )/( l η b f cd ) 127.42 127.42

Lever arm z, mm  f yd As 
d
1 − 2hf bd


 cd  1364.03 1364.03
Moment of Resistance, Mr,tm Mr =A sl .f yd .z 1360.10 801.15
Safe Safe
316
Design for Shear ULS Case 1-ML Case 2-MT Shear as per -Cl.10.3.2
Shear force due to superstructure, t V 15.2 115.4
Torsion, tm T 0.0 0.0
Total Design Shear Force, t V ED 15.2 115.4
Shear Resistance WithoutShear Reinforcement., t V Rd.c 296.2 174.5
Shear Resistance With Shear Reinforcement., t V Rd.s 657.9 328.9
Shear Resistance of Concrete, t Safe Safe
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 22933.6 13508.8
Width of the cap, mm bw 7300 4300
Effective depth, mm d 1415.0 1415.0
f ck 30 30
f yk 500 500
K =1 + √(200/d) < = 2 1.38 1.38 Eq. 10.2
Strength reduction factor shear n min = 0.031 k3/2 f ck 1/2 0.27 0.27 Eq. 10.3
Axial force in structure, t N ED 0.00 0.00
Conc.comp.stress at CG axis s cp =N ED / A c < 0.2 f cd 0.000 0.000
0.2 f cd 2.680 2.680
Reinforcement ratio ρ1 =A sl / b w d < 0.02 0.00222 0.00222 Cl.10.3.1, fig 10.5
V Rd.c =[0.12 K (80 ρ1 f ck )0.33+0.15 σ cp ] b w d 296.2 174.5 Eq. 10.1
V Rd.Cmin =(v min + 0.15 σ cp ) b w d 283.1 166.7
V Rd,C 296.2 174.5
Shear Strriup requirement No No
Shear Resistance With Vertical Shear Reinforcement Cl.10.3.3
Dia of Shear Reinforcement, mm 12 12
Number of Legs 16 16
Area of Shear reinforcement, mm2 A sw 1808.6 1808.6
Lever arm, mm z 1364.0 1364.0
Spacing of Stirrups s 150 300

Check, Minimum Shear Reinforcement ratio Cl 10.3.3.5
Angle of Inclinations of conc. Comp. truss with axis of reinf. a 90 90 Cl 10.2.2.2(1), fig. 10.2(a)
rW 0.00165 0.00140 Cl 10.3.1, fig 10.2(a)
r min 0.00079 0.00079 Eq. 10.20
safe safe
317
Punching Shear Check (As per cl. 10.4.5 IRC 112-2011) At Distance d/2 from Face
VED,red
Punching Shear Stress ved =
ud
Punching Shear 2d 2d
Reistance
vRd = 0.12K(80ρ 1 f ck ) 1/3 ≥ v min
a a
VED,red = Net Applied Force = 208 t For corner Pile

u = Basic Control Perimeter = 2248.4 mm
d = Effective depth at section considered = 1415 mm
a = Distance of Control Perimeter considered = 707.5 mm
ρ1 = Reinforcement Ratio = 0.00222
v = 0.6 [1-fck/310] = 0.542 MPa
K = 1+√(200/d) = 1.376
v Rd.max = Maximum Punching Shear Resistance = 3.631 MPa
3/2 1/2
v min. = 0.031K fck = 0.274 MPa ######### 1.208
v ed = Punching Shear Stress = 0.652 MPa
Safe in Punching Shear
v Rd. = Punching Shear Resistance = 0.371 MPa
= Punching Shear Resistance = 1.096 MPa
v Rd..c = Design Punching Shear Resistance without = 1.096 MPa
Punching Shear Reinforcement > Actual Punching Shear, Hence OK
318
11 Design of Pile & Pile Cap -SLS
Pile Details Materials
Dia of piles = 1.00 m Grade of Concrete, fck = M 30
No. of piles = 6 Nos Grade of Steel, fyk = Fe500
Spacing of piles = 3.00 m c/c
Pile length = 20 m Particular Weight (t) LA (m) ML (tm)
Free length of pile above soil = 0.2 m Pilecap weight 117.7 0.0 0.0
Pile Cap Details Soil wt. on pile Cap 28.6 0.0 0.0
Pilecap Projection, beyond pile = 150 mm Approach fill 0.00 2.15 0.00
Min. Spacing for clayey Soil, 3 x Dia = 3.00 m c/c RE wall weight 0.00 2.05 0.00
Min Spacing in sandy soil, 2.5 X Dia = 2.50 m c/c
Summary of Loads (including Pile Cap & Soil) -

S No Load Case P (t) HL (t) HT (t) ML (tm) MT (tm) Resultant, Factor
H
1 Normal 635.0 34.8 0.0 190.6 373.2 35.9 1.0

2 Normal 572.8 35.4 0.9 221.7 374.7 36.5 1.0
3 Normal 572.8 35.4 0.9 191.7 374.7 36.5 1.0
4 Wind 619.3 38.9 13.9 214.8 459.1 42.4 1.0
5 Wind 557.0 39.5 14.8 246.0 460.5 43.3 1.0
6 Wind 557.0 39.5 14.8 215.9 460.5 43.3 1.0
7 Quasi 479.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.0
8 Quasi 283.1 0.6 0.9 100.3 1.5 2.2 1.0
9 Quasi 417.5 0.6 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.2 1.0

Free length of pile, L1 = 19.00 cm
4
Moment of inertia of pile, I = 4.91E+06 cm
2
Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., E = 311866 Kg/cm
Table 3, As per IS:2911 - 2010 1 4 Compression
K1-Dry K1-Submer
Soil type N Value
kN/m3 kN/m3
Very Loose Sand 0-4 <0.4 <0.2 Transv. 0.65

Loos Sand 4-10 0.4-2.5 0.2-1.4
Medium Sand 10-35 2.5-7.5 1.4-5.0
>35 7.5-20 5.0-12.0
Dense Sand 1.50
2 5
3
Value of K1 = 1 kg/cm Long
Hence, T = 273.52 cm 7.30
Ratio, L1 / T = 0.069 L1 / R =
From fig. 4, IS 2911 - 2010
Lf / T or Lf / R = 2.20
Lf = 6.02 m
3 6
Min Embedded Length of Pile, 4T = 10.94 m
Min Length of Pile = 11.13 m 0.65
Actual pile length = 20.00 m Okay
Lf considered = = 6.02 m Tension
From fig. 5B, IS 2911 - 2010, Reduction factor 3.00
Consider fixed headed pile
m = 0.85 4.30
319
Moments in each pile Pile No X Y
Load Case Load MT ML Resultant 1 -1.50 3.00
1 Normal 1.5 16.4 16.5 2 -1.50 0.00
2 Normal 1.8 16.7 16.8 3 -1.50 -3.00
3 Normal 1.8 16.7 16.8 4 1.50 3.00
4 Normal 0.0 0.0 0.0 5 1.50 0.00
4 Wind 7.6 18.2 19.7 6 1.50 -3.00
5 Wind 8.0 18.5 20.1 7 0.00 0.00
6 Wind 8.0 18.5 20.1 8 0.00 0.00
7 Wind 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sx2 13.50
7 Quasi 1.5 1.1 1.8 Sy2 36.00
8 Quasi 1.8 1.4 2.3
9 Quasi 1.8 1.4 2.3
10 Quasi 0.0 0.0 0.0
Load no Pile 1 Pile 2 Pile 3 Pile 4 Pile 5 Pile 6 Pile 7 Pile 8
1 115.8 84.7 53.6 158.1 127.0 95.9 0.0 0.0
2 102.1 70.8 39.6 151.3 120.1 88.9 0.0 0.0
3 105.4 74.2 42.9 148.0 116.8 85.5 0.0 0.0
4 117.6 79.3 41.1 165.3 127.1 88.8 0.0 0.0
5 103.9 65.5 27.1 158.5 120.2 81.8 0.0 0.0
6 107.2 68.8 30.5 155.2 116.8 78.5 0.0 0.0
7 79.9 79.9 79.9 79.9 79.9 79.9 0.0 0.0
8 36.2 36.0 35.9 58.4 58.3 58.2 0.0 0.0
9 69.6 69.5 69.3 69.8 69.7 69.6 0.0 0.0

Max. reqd. Min. reqd.
pile pile
Condition MAX. MIN. Moment Factor capacity capacity
with self with self
weight weight
Normal 158.1 39.6 16.8 1.00 197.4 78.9
Wind 165.3 27.1 20.1 1.00 204.6 66.4
Quasi 79.9 35.9 2.3 1.00 119.2 75.2
Max Net Ultimate load on pile = 165.3 t

Min Net Ultimate load on pile = 27.1 t
L = L1 + Lf = 6.2 m
Ultimate Horizontal load on each pile = 7.2 t
Pile Design Forces- for Structural strength

Condition Max Load Moment Factor Load Moment P ML MT Resultant H
Normal 158.12 16.77 1.00 158.1 16.8 158.1 16.7 1.8 6.1
Wind 165.34 20.12 1.00 165.3 20.1 165.3 18.5 8.0 7.2
Quasi 79.95 2.30 1.00 79.9 2.3 79.9 1.4 1.8 0.4
Condition Min Load Moment Factor Load Moment

Normal 39.61 16.77 1.00 39.6 16.8
Wind 27.13 20.12 1.00 27.1 20.1
Quasi 35.91 2.30 1.00 35.9 2.3
320
1.00
1.415
1.5 0.00 1.50

1.50
0.65 1.50 1.50 0.65
Depth of Pile Cap = 1.50 m

Pile shall be embeded in Pile cap = 50 mm
Eff. cover for Reinforcement = 75 mm Density of Concrete 2.5 t/m2
Dia of Rebar Long. Direction = 20 mm Density of Soil 2 t/m2
Dia of Rebar Transverse Direction = 20 mm
Effe. Depth of pile cap, deff = 1415 mm
Height of soil over cap = 0.50 m

Length of Heel = 1.65 m
Length of Toe = 1.65 m
Design of Pile Cap in Longitudinal Direction Rare Quasi
Weight of Pile cap+earth over it+ RE wall = 146.3 t DL Backfill
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap & soil at pier face = 47.2 tm 47.2 tm 1.00 1.0
Total Load on Pile in one col, Max of (1+2+3,4+5+6) = 381.2 t 239.8 t
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile (1+2+3,4+5+6) = 1.00 m 1.00 m
Bending Moment in Long. Dir. due to Pile (1+2+3,4+5+6) = 381.2 tm 239.8 tm
Bending Moment per m at crtical section = 52.23 tm/m abutment face to pile outer dist= 1.5
Net Bending moment at the face of pier = 334.0 tm Section from abutment face =
192.6 tm 1.415
Total Shear Force at critical section = 32.4 t diff for linear interpolation= 0.085
Design of Pile Cap in Transverse Direction

Weight of Pile cap+earth over it = 146.32 t
Bending Moment due to weight of pile cap & soil at pier face = 52.11 tm 52.11 tm
Total Load on Pile in one row, Max of (1+4,3+6) = 282.93 t 159.90 t
Lever arm for bending moment due to Pile (1+4,3+6) = 1.61 m 1.00 m
Bending Moment in transv.Dir. due to Pile (1+4,3+6) = 455.19 tm 159.90 tm
Bending Moment per m at crtical section = 105.86 t-m/m
Net Bending moment at the face of pier = 403.08 tm 107.79 tm

Total Shear Force at critical section = 0.0 t
321
Net Shear force at critical section = -4.8 t
Design for Stress Lvl., Check - SLS Case 1-ML Case 2MT Reference
Design Constants Characteristic Comp. Cube Strength, mpa f ck 30 30 IRC 112-2011
Characteristic yield strength of steel,mpa f yk 500 500
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel, mpa Es 2.0E+05 2.0E+05
Mean value of Conc. Cube Comp. Strength f cm 40 40 Eq. A2- 1
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc., mpa E cm 31186.6 31186.6 Eq. A2- 5
Modulus of Elasticity of conc(with creep) E c, eff 10868.4 10868.4
Effective Modular ratio a e = E s / E c,eff 18.4 18.4 Cl. 12.4.2 (2), Eq. 12.15
Creep coefficient f 1.87 1.87 Cl. 6.4.2.7
Material factor Steel gs 1.15 1.15 Cl. 6.2.2. Notes(1)
Concrete gm 1.50 1.50 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Coeff. to consider influence of conc. Strength,alpha a 0.67 0.67 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Effective ht. factor of comp. zone, l 0.80 0.80 A2.9, Eq A2-33
Effective strength factor, h 1.00 1.00 A2.9, Eq A2-35
Ultimate compressive strain Concrete e cu3 0.0035 0.0035 Table 6.5
Steel es 0.00217 0.00217 cl.6.2.2
Design comp strength, mpa f cd = α f ck / g m 13.4 13.4 Cl. 6.4.2.8
Design strength of steel, mpa f yd = f yk / g s 434.8 434.8 cl.6.2.2
Width of the cap, mm b or bw 7300 4300
Depth of cap, mm D 1500 1500
Tension Reinforcement Spacing of Bars 100 100
Area of Steel, mm2 A sl 22934 13509
Clear cover, mm C 75 75
Effective depth, mm deff 1415.0 1415.0
Case 1-ML Case 2MT

Depth of Neutral axis, mm, ytop x =(A sl f yd )/( l η b f cd ) 127.4 127.4
Compression Reinforcement No. of bars 100 100
Area of Steel, mm2 Asc 11304.0 11304.0
Effective cover, mm d' 81.0 81.0
Depth of Extreme Fibre Tension Reinforcement, mm, ybot Ybot 1287.6 1287.6 `
Moment of inertia of Uncracked section, mm4 I uncracked 2.05E+12 1.21E+12
Tensile Stress in concrete fctm 1.220 1.666
Permissible tensile stress of concrete fctm, n 2.50 2.50 Eq. A2-2
Uncraked Uncraked
Check of Stresses Assuming Short Term Creep and Elastic Modulus
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 219.5 219.5
Icr (cracked) = As (d- dc)^2 +Eceff b dc^3/3 Es 3.68E+10 2.17E+10
Section Modulus, mm3 Ztop 1.7E+08 9.9E+07
Section Modulus, mm3 Zbot 3.1E+07 1.8E+07
Compressive Stresses at top s c top 3.11 6.37
Permissible stress 0.48*fck 14.40 14.40
safe safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel 108.5 222.4
Permissible stress 0.6*fyk 300.0 300.0
safe safe `
322
Quasipermanent Combinations
Case 1-ML Case 2MT
Check of Stresses Assuming Long Term Creep and Elastic Modulus
dc = (( - AsEs) + sqrt((AsEs)^2 + 2 b As Es Eceff d )) / b Eceff 350.8 350.8
Icr (cracked) = As (d- dc)^2 +Eceff b dc^3/3 Es 3.42E+10 2.01E+10
Section Modulus, mm3 Ztop 9.7E+07 5.7E+07
Section Modulus, mm3 Zbot 3.2E+07 1.9E+07
Compressive Stresses at top s c top 1.07 1.02
Permissible stress 0.48*fck 14.40 14.40
safe safe
Tensile Stress at level of Steel 59.99 56.98
Permissible stress 0.6*fyk 300.0 300.0
safe safe
Design for Crack Width, Check - SLS Case 1-ML Case 2MT Crack width as per Cl. 12.3.4
Cracked Status Uncraked Uncraked
Factor depending on duration of load Kt 0.50 0.50
h 1500 1500
hc,eff 212.5 212.5
Ac,eff 1551250.0 913750.0
r P,eff 0.015 0.015
fct, eff 2.50 2.50
[ s sc -K t *f ct,eff / r p,eff (1+ a e r p , eff )] / E s >=[0.6* s sc / E S ] -0.0002 -0.0003 Eq .12.6
[0.6* s sc /E S ] 0.0002 0.0002 Eq .12.6
(esm-ecm) 0.0002 0.0002 Eq .12.6
Max crack spacing Sr,Max 484.98 484.98 Eq .12.8
Crack width WK = Sr,max*(ξ sm –ξ cm) 0.087 0.083
Crack width permissible WK,PER 0.30 0.30
safe safe
323
PILE Interaction Diagram
Pile Dia D = 1000 mm

d'/D = 0.10
Clear cover = 75 mm
1.00 Dia of bar = 20 Spacing
Nos. of Bars = 16 Nos 158.258
Effective cover = 97 mm 200 max Spacing
Reinf Circular dia = 806 mm OK
Spacing = 158.258 mm Max Steel
Area of steel provided = 5026.55 mm2 19635 OK
Material Properties: % steel provided = 0.64 % OK
2
fck = 35 N/mm Minimum % steel = 0.40 % OK 477.052
2
fyk = 500 N/mm p/fck = 0.01829 1570.8
2
Es = 200000 N/mm
Check of Min Steel as per 16.2.2 - IRC:112-2011
Min Steel 0.1Ned/Fyd = 477.29 mm2
0.002Ac = 1570.8 mm2 OK
Pu Mu
xu/D T Tm
1E-09 -217.878 0.376645 1E-09
0.1 -143.087 31.638262 0.1
0.2 1.457383 82.647393 0.2
0.3 150.8619 122.63115 0.3 1600
0.4 303.3411 149.24435 0.4
0.5 463.4502 161.82822 0.5 1400
0.6 632.5628 157.56898 0.6 1200
0.7 792.8866 142.21108 0.7
1000
0.8 938.5779 119.85534 0.8
0.9 1067.652 92.351913 0.9 800
1 1172.207 64.394837 1
Pu (T)
600
1.1 1237.074 46.795474 1.1
1.2 1281.944 34.605888 1.2 400
1.3 1314.893 25.358693 1.3 200
1.4 1339.647 18.1077 1.4
1.5 1358.152 12.304238 1.5 0
1.6 1372.254 7.6820339 1.6 -50 0 50 100 150 200
-200
1.7 1382.914 4.01627 1.7
1.8 1390.871 1.152846 1.8 -400
Mu (T-m)
1.9 1396.699 -1.029607 1.9
2 1400.855 -2.634906 2
2.1 1403.709 -3.753946 2.1
Transverse Reinforcement (Cl. 16.2.3 IRC:112-2011)
Diameter of Transverse Reinforcement 10 mm OK

Spacing of Transverse Reinforcement shall be minimum of followng
240 mm
1000 mm
200 mm r f yd
 =
w
Provide 10 dia @ 175 mm wd

f cd
Calculation of Confining Reinforcement 4 A sp

rw =
D sp . S L
Ductile detailing has been done as per IRC-112
wd.c  Max(1.4.req;0.18)
AC f yd
w.req = 0.37 hk + 0.13 (r L − .01)
ACC f cd
ηk = Normalized axial force Dsp
Ac = Area of section considered
NED = 207.518 T
2
Ac = 0.785 m ACC
2
fck = 35 N/mm
Hence ηk = 0.074 < 0.08

No need for confining reinforcement
324
A sp r w D sp
=
SL
ωwd = 4 Confining reinforcement expressed as ratio
fyd = 434.7826 Mpa
fcd = 15.61 Mpa
ρw = Volumetric ratio of tranverse reinforcement defined as
Dsp = 0.850 m
The Minimum confining reinforcement is as given by
Required confining reinforcement is given by
ACC = Confined (core) concrete area of the section within the outside
dia of the hoop
2
= 0.567 m
ρL = 0.0064 = Ratio of reinforcement
wwreq = 0.02489
1.4ww.req = 0.0348
wwd.c = Max
0.18
wwd.c = 0.18
ρw = 0.006463
2
= 0.00137 m /m
2
= 1373.29 mm /m
2
Provide 16 @ 110 = 1827.8 mm
SAFE
325
ULS, CHECK FOR PILE MOMENT CAPACITY :
1.00
Moment reduction factor m = 0.85

fck = 35 Mpa
ULS Forces at Pile Top Level :

Pile Reaction Moment MED Moment MRD
Vertical Load From Intraction Curve
Check ( MED<
LC Horizont M = Q (L1 + MRD)
Max Min al (Q) Lf)/2*m Max NED Min NED
Tonne Tonne Tonne Tm Tm
LC-1 199.40 64.29 6.83 17.93 131.103 99.463 OK
LC-2 207.52 48.59 8.08 21.24 132.520 95.260 OK
LC-3 178.57 28.99 15.30 40.27 127.468 90.017 OK
SlENDERNESS CHECK
Clear height of compression member Lo = 6.02 m
Effective length of column along x-xaxis leL = 1.5 * Lo Table 11.1 of IRC;112-2011
= 9.0261273 m
Slenderness ratio along x-x .axis lxx = leL/iL
= 30.1
Effective length of column along y-y axis leT = 1.5 * Lo Table 11.1 of IRC;112-2011
= 9.0261273 m
Slenderness ratio along L-L axis lyy = leT/iT
= 30.1
Here lL lT = 1.00 No check for limiting slenderness ratio.

< 2
Here lT lL = 1.00 No check for limiting slenderness ratio.
< 2
Moment of inertia about x-x axis
4
ITT = 0.10179 m
Moment of inertia about y-yaxis
4
ILL = 0.10179 m
Radius of gyration along x-xaxis
iL = 0.3 m
Radius of gyration along y-y axis
iT = 0.3 m
Area of concrete = 1.13 m2
326
Check
required
eL =MEDL / eT =MEDT eL/T / for
Sr. No. NED(ton) MEDL(tm) MEDT(tm) eL/L eT/T
NED / NED eT/L Limiting
slendern
ess ratio
1 199.40 17.93 0.38 0.09 0.002 0.08991 0.002 0.021 No
2 207.52 19.96 11.76 0.10 0.057 0.09619 0.057 0.589 Yes
3 178.57 35.44 38.79 0.20 0.217 0.19847 0.217 1.095 Yes
Limiting value of slenderness ratio

( IRC-112 , Clause 11.2.1 )
2
llim = 20 *A*B*C / n Ac = 785398 mm
2
A = 1 /( 1+0.2fef ) As = 5026.55 mm
fef = f ( a , to) * MoEqp / MoEd , Effective creep ratio. fcd = 13.40 Mpa
MoEqp = First order BM in quasi-permanent load combination in SLS. fyd = 434.78 Mpa
MoEd = First order BM in design load combination in ULS.
f ( a , to) = creep for pier
= 1.87
B = 1 + 2w
w = Asfyd/(Acfcd) Mechanical reinforcement ratio. 0.20766
Hence , B = 1.190
C = 1.7 - rm
rm = Mo1/Mo2
= 0.00 In the case case of pile
Hence , C = 1.70
n = NEd / ( Ac fcd ) relative normal force.
Summary of forces
ULS FORCES SLS FORCES (QP) Check for second order effect in long. Direction
Second order
Sr. No. effect, l<llim,
NED(ton) MEDL(tm) MEDT(tm) MEDL(tm) MEDT(tm) MoEqp / MoEd fef A n llim
Ignore ; l>llim,
consider
1 199.40 17.93 0.38 1.37 1.84 0.077 0.1433133 0.97214 0.189 90.34 ignore
2 207.52 19.96 11.76 1.37 1.84 0.069 0.1287083 0.9749 0.197 88.80 ignore
3 178.57 35.44 38.79 1.37 1.84 0.039 0.0724896 0.98571 0.170 96.79 ignore
327
9 : DESIGN OF Pile - SERVICIBILITY LIMIT STATE
Forces on Pile for Servicibility Limit State
Load Case P M
Rare - Normal 158.12 16.77
Rare - Wind 165.34 20.12
Quasipermanent 79.95 2.30
Pile Dia = 1000.0 mm

% of Steel Provided = 0.640 %
Clear cover = 75 mm
Bar Dia = 20 mm
Link dia = 10 mm
Effective cover = 97.0 mm
2
Total Ast = 5027 mm
Nos = 16.0
Grade of Concrete = M 35
Grade of steel = Fe 500
f cm = 45
Secant Modulus of Elasticity of Conc. E cm = 32.31 GPa
= 32308.2 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of steel = 2.0E+05 MPa
Modular Ratio = 6.19
Creep Coefficient = 1.00 (Refer Separate Calculations)
Modulus of Elasticity of concrete, Effective Ec eff= 16154.1 Gpa Eq.12.15, IRC 112
Modular Ratio considering long term creep = 12.38
Calculation of Stress for Servicibility Limit State
Permissible Stresses
Rare Combinations Concrete 0.48fck = 16.80
Steel 0.6Fy = 300.00
Quasipermanent Combinations Concrete 0.36fck = 12.60
Steel 0.6Fy = 300.00
Force Modular
Load Comb
P, t M, t-m Ratio
Rare - Normal 158 17 6.19

Rare - Wind 165 20 6.19
Quasipermanent 80 2 12.38
328
Calculation of Creep Coeffiecient (As per Annexure A2, A2.5, IRC:112-2011)
For Pier Shaft

Ф(t,t 0 ) = β c (t,t 0 ).Ф 0 = 1.87
Where,
Ф0 = Ф RH β(f cm ) β(t 0 ). = 1.89
t = Age of concrete in days at time the time considered = = 25550 days
t0 = is the age of Concrete in days at time of loading = 90 days
1/3
Ф RH = 1+(1-RH/100)/(0.1*h 0 ) for fcm <= 45 = 1.63
RH = Relative Humidity
Relative Humidity = 50 %
fck = Characteristic Compressive Strength = 30 MPa
fcm = Mean Compressive Strength = 40 MPa
β(f cm ) = 18.78/√f cm = 2.97
β(t 0 ). = 1/(0.1+t 0 0.2 ) = 0.39
h0 = Notional side of Member 2Ac/u = 499.6 mm
w = Width of Section = 2997 mm
h = Depth of Section = 1000 mm
Ac = Cross Sectional Area, mm2 = 1782298 mm2
u = Perimeter in Contact with atmosphere = 7135 mm
β c (t,t 0 ) = [(t-t 0 ) / (βH + t - t 0 )] 0.3 = 0.989
(t-t 0 ) = Actual duration of loading = 25460 days
βH = 1.5(1+(1.2 RH/RH 0 ) 18 )h 0 + 250 <= 1500 fcm = 45 = 999.4
RH 0 = = 100 %
329
For Pier Cap
Ф(t,t 0 ) = β c (t,t 0 ).Ф 0 = 1.74
Where,
Ф0 = Ф RH β(f cm ) β(t 0 ). = 1.77
t = Age of concrete in days at time the time considered = = 25550 days
t0 = is the age of Concrete in days at time of loading = 90 days
1/3
Ф RH = 1+(1-RH/100)/(0.1*h 0 ) for fcm <= 45 = 1.53
RH = Relative Humidity
Relative Humidity = 50 %
fck = Characteristic Compressive Strength = 30 MPa
fcm = Mean Compressive Strength = 40 MPa
β(f cm ) = 18.78/√f cm = 2.97
β(t 0 ). = 1/(0.1+t 0 0.2 ) = 0.39
h0 = Notional side of Member 2Ac/u = 845.2 mm
w = Width of Section = 2610 mm
h = Depth of Section = 1250 mm
Ac = Cross Sectional Area, mm2 = 3262500 mm2
u = Perimeter in Contact with atmosphere = 7720 mm
β c (t,t 0 ) = [(t-t 0 ) / (βH + t - t 0 )] 0.3 = 0.983
(t-t 0 ) = Actual duration of loading = 25460 days
18
βH = 1.5(1+(1.2 RH/RH 0 ) )h 0 + 250 <= 1500 fcm = 45 = 1500.0
RH 0 = = 100 %
Modular Ratio for pier shaft
(RARE AND QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS) NORMAL CASE
Design Bending moment ( with Rare combination) MRARE = 130.49 t-m/m

Design Bending moment ( with Quasi permanent combination) MQP = 0.00 t-m/m
Bending moment due to short term loading MST = 130.49 t-m/m
Modulus of elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete Ecm = 31186.57 Mpa
Creep coefficient f = 1.87
For long term loading Ecm' = 10868.41 Mpa
Modular ratio for Quasi Permanent condition = Es/Ecm'
= 18.40195
Equavalent modulus of elasticity for Rare combination
Eceq = Ecm x( MQP + MST)
MST + (1+f) x MQP
= 31186.57 Mpa
Modular ratio for Rare combination = Es/Eceq
6.41
(RARE AND QUASI PERMANENT LOAD COMBINATIONS) wind CASE
Design Bending moment ( with Rare combination) MRARE = 144.06 t-m/m

Design Bending moment ( with Quasi permanent combination) MQP = 0.00 t-m/m
Bending moment due to short term loading MST = 144.06 t-m/m
Modulus of elasticity of steel Es = 2.0E+05 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity of concrete Ecm = 31186.57 Mpa
Creep coefficient f = 1.87
For long term loading Ecm' = 10868.41 Mpa
Modular ratio for Quasi Permanent condition = Es/Ecm'
= 18.40195
Equavalent modulus of elasticity for Rare combination
Eceq = Ecm x( MQP + MST)
MST + (1+f) x MQP
= 31186.57 Mpa
Modular ratio for Rare combination = Es/Eceq
6.41
330
Design of pedestal
As PER IRC 78 2014 710.10.3

C= C0*SQRT (A1/A2) = C0
Pedestal length = 850 mm

Pedestal width = 850 mm
Grade of pedestal = M 30 Mpa
Permissible direct compressive stress 14.4 Mpa
A1 = 722500 mm2
A2 = 1322500 mm2
C = 10.64348 Mpa
Load on bearing = 53.59221 Ton
Compressive stress = 0.741761 Mpa < 10.64348 Ok
As per IRC 112, Longitudinal reinforcement = 1083.75 mm2

One side = 541.875 mm2
Provide 12 dia 100 c/c 848.23 mm2 Ok
331
H V P v (Km/Hr) P ( Kg/m2) v(m/s) P (N/m2)
0 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
2 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
4 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
6 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
8 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
10 39.594 940.600 100.08 47.257014 27.8 463.7
15 41.588 1039.589 105.12 52.230364 29.2 512.5
20 43.155 1116.874 109.08 56.113246 30.3 550.6
30 44.721 1197.201 113.04 60.148997 31.4 590.2
50 47.142 1337.165 119.16 67.180987 33.1 659.2
60 47.855 1371.852 120.96 68.923698 33.6 676.3
70 48.424 1406.944 122.40 70.686791 34 693.6
80 48.994 1442.645 123.84 72.480458 34.4 711.2
90 49.706 1478.752 125.64 74.294508 34.9 729
100 50.276 1515.264 127.08 76.12894 35.3 747
Factor to be mutiplied to wind speed = 1.424

Factor to be mutiplied to wind speed = 2.028
332
Design Philosophy for Deck Slab
A. Method of Analysis for Deck Slab
Transverse Analysis: The deck slab has been analysed transversely as a continuous one way slab, supported
on longitudinal girders with cantilever overhangs beyond the outer girders on either side, by taking unit width
of deck along the span. The analysis has been carried out for various loads i.e. dead load, SIDL & CWLL. Live
load effects are taken based on the effective width method as per IRC : 112-2011. Temperature rise and fall
cases are compensated with extra reinforcement. Various design sections have been identified and designed
for worst combination of above loads. The analysis has been carried out by STAAD PRO. The representative
section of slab taken for transvesre analysis is taken at mid span. Same design shall hold good for other
sections also.
The Grade of concrete for deck slab and diaphragm is M30 , whereas, the steel grade is Fe-500D.
333
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
RCC -T GIRDER
INPUTS
Angle of skew = 0.000 degree cosq 1
Total Width of Superstructure = 8.400 m
Width of Carriageway = 7.500 m
Width of Crash barrier = 0.450 m
Width of Footpath = 0.000 m
Width of RCC Railing = 0.000 m
Thickness of Deck slab at centre = 0.225 m
Thickness of Deck slab at cant end = 0.225 m
Nos. of Longitudinal Girders = 3
Width of Girder Flange at top = 0.900 m
Width of Girder Flange at bottom = 0.800 m
Square Skew
C/C spacing of Longitudinal girders = 3.000 m 0.000 m
Transverse Ovehang of Deck slab = 1.200 m 0.000 m
Longitudinal Ovehang of Deck slab = 0.500 m 0.000 m
1.0 LOAD CALCULATION
1.1 CALCULATION OF DEAD LOAD
Self weight of Deck Slab would be calculated by the program itself using command SELFWEIGHT Y -1
1.2 CALCULATION OF SUPERIMPOSED DEAD LOAD
(i) Weight of Crash barrier

Crash Barrier = 10.00 KN/m
(ii) Wearing coat (100mm thk.)
2
= 0.10*22 = 2.2 KN/m
1.3 CARRIAGEWAY LIVE LOAD
For the maximum span moment different load cases have been considered and presented in a tabular form.
70R(W), 70R(T) and Class A loading are considered. Critical live load cases have been considered for the purpose of
design.
As per IRC:112-2011
beff = a.a(1-a/L) + b1 For Continuous span
beff = 1.2 . a + b1 For Cantilever portion
For Continuous Span:
L= 3.00 m
a= Distance of the concentrated load from C/L of nearest support
b1 = Width of the load parallel to support+2x thk of WC
For cantilever span
L= 1.200m
a= Distance of the concentrated load from face of the support
b1 = Width of the load parallel to support+2x thk of WC
Impact Factor :
a) for Continuous span,
Class A =1.5
70R (w & T)
=1.25
b) For cantilever span
Class A =1.5
70R (w & T)
=1.25
334
3.0 DESIGN OF DECK SLAB
Depth of Deck Slab in between Girders = 0.225 m
Depth of Deck Slab at Cantilever junction = 0.150 m
Depth of Deck Slab at Cantilever tip = 0.225 m
Grade of Concrete = M30
Grade of steel ("m" for Mild Steel & "t" for HYSD) = t
Clear Cover = 40 mm
Cosine of Skew angle = 1.000
3 4
1 2
SECTION I 1 2 3 4
Top 0.00 0.00 7.450 2.51

DL
Bottom 1.00 3.17 0.00 0.00
Top 2.00 0.00 8.240 1.07
SIDL
Bottom 0.00 3.10 0.00 0.00
LL1 : 70RW (m) Top 12.00 15.00 0.00 27.80
70RW (l)
70RTracked Bottom 45.50 35.40 18.60 4.00
Top 10.00 15.00 46.10 19.00

LL2 : CL-A 1-Lane
Bottom 31.50 23.60 14.70 4.00
Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.80
LL3 : 70RW+CL-A
Bottom 49.50 35.40 0.00 0.00
Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Top 12.00 15.00 46.10 27.80
LL BM (Maximum-3 LANE)
Bottom 49.50 35.40 18.60 4.00
Top 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
TEMPERATURE
Bottom 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Load Factors as per IRC:112-2011
Factor Factor Factor(Crac Reliving

Load
(Strength) (Stress) k Width) factor
DL 1.35 1 1 1
SIDL 1.75 1 1 1
LL 1.5 1 0
TEMPERATURE 0 1 0.5
4.1 Strength Limit State
1 2 3 4
Hogging Moment kN-m 21.50 22.50 93.628 46.96
Sagging Moment kN-m 75.60 62.80 27.90 6.00
4.2 Serviceability For Checking Stress
1 2 3 4
Hogging Moment kN-m 14 15 61.79 31.38
Sagging Moment kN-m 50.5 41.67 18.6 4
4.3 Serviceability For Crack Width and Permanent Stress Check
1 2 3 4
Hogging Moment kN-m 2 0 15.69 3.58
Sagging Moment kN-m 1 6.27 0 0
335
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
Type Sections 1 2 3 4
Type of element ( B for Beam & S for Slab ) Reference Unit S S S S

Location Top Top Top Top
Load Data
Moment From Staad output kN-m 22 23 94 47
Material Data
Grade of Steel Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500 Fe 500
Charecteristic strength of reinforcement ( fyk ) Table 18.1, IRC 112 MPa 500 500 500 500
partial factor for steel ( gs ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15
Design value for tensile strength ( fyd = fyk/gs ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 MPa 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
Modulus of Elasticity of Steel ( Es ) Cl 6.2.2, IRC 112 GPa 200 200 200 200
Grade of Concrete M 30 M 30 M 30 M 30
Charecteristics compressive strength ( fck ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 30 30 30 30
a Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Concrete material factor ( gm ) Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
Design value for concrete compressive strength ( fcd = afck/gm ) Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 MPa 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40
Geometric Data
Width of Slab / Beam ( b ) mm 1000 1000 1000 1000
Total Depth of Slab/Beam ( D ) mm 225 225 225 225
Cover to Reinforcement ( c ) mm 40 40 40 40
Dia of Reinforcement ( f ) mm 12 12 16 12
Specing of Reinforcement ( s ) or mm 150 150 125 150
Number of Bar ( n ) Nos 0 0 0 0
Area of Reinforcement ( At ) mm2 754 754 1608 754
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.335 0.335 0.715 0.335
Dia of Shear Reinforcement ( f ) mm 10 10 10 10
Spacing of Reinforcement ( s ) or mm 200 200 200 200
Number of leg 0 0 0 0
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000
336
Strength of the section
Moment Resistance
Effective depth of section ( d = D - c - f/2 ) mm 179 179 177 179
Depth of neutral axis from compression flange ( x ) mm 31 31 65 31
l Eq A2-33 & 34, IRC 112 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
h Eq A2-35 & 36, IRC 112 1 1 1 1
Depth of stress block ( lx ) mm 24 24 52 24
Stress on stress block ( hfcd ) MPa 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40
Total Compression Force ( Fc = lx hfcd b) kN 328 328 699 328
Total Tension Force ( Fs = fyd At or fs At) kN 328 328 699 328
Diff ( Fc - Fs ) kN 0 0 0 0
Depth of lever arm ( z = d - lx/2) mm 167 167 151 167
Moment of Resistance ( Fc z ) kN-m 55 55 106 55
Usage 0.39 0.41 0.89 0.86
Status O.K. O.K. O.K. O.K.
Max Strain on concrete in compression ( ecu3 ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035
Max Strain on reinforcement in tension ( es = ecu3*(d-x)/x ) 0.0170 0.0170 0.0060 0.0170
Stress in Reinforcement ( fs ) MPa 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
Status Under Reinf Under Reinf Under Reinf Under Reinf
Min Reinf As min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd or 0.0013btd Eq 16.1, IRC 112 mm2 233 233 230 233
fctm = Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5
Status OK OK OK OK
Distribution Reinforcement (Clause:16.6.1.1-IRC:112-2011)
Minimum Distribution Reinforcement (20% of Main Reinf.) mm2 151 151 322 151
Reinforcement Provided mm2 565 565 565 565
Status OK OK OK OK
337
DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
Sections
Type 1 2 3 4
Type of element ( B for Beam & S for Slab ) Reference Unit S S S S

Location Bottom Bottom Bottom Bottom
Load Data
Moment From Staad output kN-m 76 63 28 6
Material Data
a Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Geometric Data
Total Depth of Slab/Beam ( D ) mm 225 225 225 225
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.596 0.596 0.335 0.335
Number of leg 0 0 0 0
Reinforcement ( % ) 0 0 0 0
338
Strength of the section
Moment Resistance
Effective depth of section ( d = D - c - f/2 ) mm 177 177 179 179
Depth of neutral axis from compression flange ( x ) mm 54 54 31 31
l Eq A2-33 & 34, IRC 112 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
h Eq A2-35 & 36, IRC 112 1 1 1 1
Depth of stress block ( lx ) mm 43 43 24 24
Stress on stress block ( hfcd ) MPa 13.40 13.40 13.40 13.40
Total Compression Force ( Fc = lx hfcd b) kN 583 583 328 328
Total Tension Force ( Fs = fyd At or fs At) kN 583 583 328 328
Diff ( Fc - Fs ) kN 0 0 0 0
Depth of lever arm ( z = d - lx/2) mm 155 155 167 167
Moment of Resistance ( Fc z ) kN-m 90 90 55 55
Usage 0.84 0.69 0.51 0.11
Max Strain on concrete in compression ( ecu3 ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035 0.0035
Max Strain on reinforcement in tension ( es = ecu3*(d-x)/x ) 0.0079 0.0079 0.0170 0.0170
Stress in Reinforcement ( fs ) MPa 434.78 434.78 434.78 434.78
Status Under Reinf Under Reinf Under Reinf Under Reinf
Min Reinf As min = 0.26fctm/fyk btd or 0.0013btd Eq 16.1, IRC 112 mm2 276 276 279 279
fctm = Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Status OK OK OK OK
Distribution Reinforcement (Clause:16.6.1.1-IRC:112-2011)
Minimum Distribution Reinforcement (20% of Main Reinf.) mm2 268 268 151 151
Reinforcement Provided mm2 565 565 565 565
Status OK OK OK OK
339
STRESS CHECK AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
Type
Type of element ( B for Beam & S for Slab ) Referance Unit S S S S
Sections
Load Data 1 2 3 4
Moment kN-m 50.50 41.67 61.79 31.38
Material Data
a Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 GPa 33 33 33 33
Geometric Data
Total Depth of Beam ( D ) mm 225 225 225 225
Effective depth of beam / Slab ( d ) mm 177 177 177 179
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.596 0.596 0.715 0.335
Stress Check
Concrete Cross Sectional Area ( Ac ) mm 225000 225000 225000 225000

Perimeter in contact with atmosphere ( u ) mm 2450 2450 2450 2450
Notional Size 183.67 183.67 183.67 183.67
Final Creep Co-efficient of 28 days ( f ) Table 6.9 & RH = 80% 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Conc. ( Eeff ) Cl 6.4.2.5, IRC 112 MPa 12360 12360 12360 12360
Modular ratio ( m ) 16.18 16.18 16.18 16.18
Allowable stress in steel Cl 12.2.2, IRC 112 MPa 400 400 400 400
Allowable stress in concrete Cl 12.2.1, IRC 112 MPa 14.40 14.40 14.40 14.40
Position of nutural axis from comp face ( x ) mm 74.40 74.40 74.40 59.40
MOA of compression area mm2 2767683 2767683 2767683 1764227
MOA of tension area mm2 2225426 2225426 2670511 1459207
Diff 542258 542258 97173 305020
MOI of cracked section 365605743 365605743 411271454 244384252
Stress in tension reinf MPa 229 189 249 249
Status OK OK OK OK
Stress in concrete MPa 10.28 8.48 11.18 7.63
Status OK OK OK OK
340
CRACKWIDTH CHECK AS PER IRC : 112 - 2011
Load Data 1 2 3 4
Moment kN-m 1.00 6 16 4
Material Data
a Cl 6.4.2.8, IRC 112 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete ( Ecm ) Table 6.5, IRC 112 GPa 33 33 33 33
Geometric Data
Total Depth of Beam ( D ) mm 225 225 225 225
Effective depth of beam / Slab ( d ) mm 177 177 177 179
2
Area of Reinforcement ( At ) mm 1340 1340 1608 754
Reinforcement ( % ) 0.596 0.596 0.715 0.335
Crack width check
Concrete Cross Sectional Area ( Ac ) mm 225000 225000 225000 225000

Perimeter in contact with atmosphere ( u ) mm 2450 2450 2450 2450
Notional Size 183.67 183.67 183.67 183.67
Final Creep Co-efficient of 28 days ( f ) Table 6.9 & RH = 80% 1.670 1.670 1.670 1.670
Effective Modulus of Elasticity of Conc. ( Eeff ) Cl 6.4.2.5, IRC 112 MPa 12360 12360 12360 12360
Modular ratio ( m ) 16.18 16.18 16.18 16.18
Allowable stress in steel Cl 12.2.2, IRC 112 MPa 400 400 400 400
Allowable stress in concrete Cl 12.2.1, IRC 112 MPa 10.80 10.80 10.80 10.80
Position of neutural axis from comp face ( x ) mm 74.40 74.40 74.40 59.40
MOA of compression area mm2 2767683 2767683 2767683 1764227
2
MOA of tension area mm 2225426 2225426 2670511 1459207
Diff 542258 542258 97173 305020
MOI of cracked section 365605743 365605743 411271454 244384252
Stress in tension reinf MPa 5 28 63 28
Effective area of concrete in tension surrounding
2
the reinforcement, Ac,eff = b x hc,eff mm 112500 112500 112500 112500
Depth of concrete in tension hc,eff = mm 112.5 112.5 112.5 112.5
ae = Es / Ecm 6.06 6.06 6.06 6.06
rr,eff = 0.012 0.012 0.014 0.007
kt = A factor dependent on the duration of the load Cl 12.3.4, IRC 112 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Mean value of tensile strength of concrete effective at the time
when the cracks may occur first, fct,eff = fctm (t) Cl 12.3.3, IRC 112
where, fctm(t) = (bcc(t))a x fctm
and the value of fctm is = Table 6.5, IRC 112 MPa 2.50061751 2.50061751 2.50061751 2.50061751
where, bcc(t) = e ^ [S x (1 - (28/(t/t1))^0.5] Eq 6.3, IRC 112
bcc(t) = Co-eff depending on age "t" and type of cement
t = Age of concrete in days = 28 28 28 28
t1 = Eq 6.3, IRC 112 1 1 1 1
S = Co-efficient depends on type of cement = Eq 6.3, IRC 112 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25
So, bcc(t) = e ^ [S x (1 - (28/(t/t1))^0.5] 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
fct,eff = fctm (t) MPa 2.90 2.90 2.90 2.90
Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 1.3 x (h - x) = Eq 12.12, IRC 112 mm 133 133 133 155
Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 3.4c + (0.425xk1xk2xf)/rr,eff Eq 12.12, IRC 113 mm 364 364 326 440
k1 = Cl 12.3.4, IRC 112 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
k2 = Cl 12.3.4, IRC 112 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
f= mm 16 16 16 12
Maximum Crack Spacing, Sr,max = 3.4c+ (0.17f)/rr,eff Eq 12.8, IRC 112 mm 364.3 364.3 326.2 440.4
Design Crack Spacing, Sr,max = Eq 12.12, IRC 112 mm 133 133 133 155
As per Eq 12.6 of IRC: 112-2011
esm -ecm = ((ssc - (kt x fct,eff x (1 + ae x rr,eff))/rr,eff))/Es 0.0000 0.0001 0.0002 0.0001
Crack width ( wk ) Eq 12.5, IRC 112 mm 0.00 0.01 0.03 0.01
Status Table 12.1, IRC 112 OK OK OK OK
Minimum Area of Reinforcement for Crack Control (as per Cl. 12.3.3 of IRC:112 - 2011)
Ned= Axial Force In Serviceability Limit State 0 0 0 0

Ned,Tensile or Compresive C C C C
sc=Ned/bh Eq 12.4, IRC 112 MPa 0 0 0 0
k1 Cl 12.3.3, IRC 112 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5
h* Cl 12.3.3, IRC 112 mm 225 225 225 225
For Rectangular Section with bending the value of kc is :--
0.4 x {1 - sc/(k1 x (h/h*) x fct,eff)} Eq 12.2, IRC 112 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Co-efficient which allows for the effect of non-uniform self equilibrating stress, k = 1 1 1 1
Minimum area of Reinf. Reqd. Cl 12.3.3, IRC 112 mm2 261 261 261 261
341
342
DESIGN OF RCC SUPERSTRUCTURE
( STANDARD 20M SPAN )
343
INTRODUCTION
The following calculations pertain to the design of single span RCC precast T-beam with Cast in
situ slab. The span arrangement is as shown in the attached sketch.
Design has been done as per limit state method of design and following checks has been done:
1 Ultimate limit state check

2 Serviceability limit state check (includes stress check, crack width check)
1. Ultimate limit state check
Moment of resistance has been calculated in this particular check and has been compared with
the ultimate moment acting on the structure at different sections.
1. Serviceability limit state
Stress calculations in different stages of construction has been done in this check along with
checking for crack width.Differential shrinkage checks and temperature checks are also
presented.
344
BASIC DESIGN DATA
1 Distance between C/C Exp. Joint 20.00 m

2 Effective span Leff 19.00 m
3 Overhang of girder off the bearing 0.350 m
4 Overhang of slab off the bearing 0.490 m EJ-Brg.= 0.75 m
5 Expansion Joint 20.0 mm
6 Deck Width 8.4 m
7 Angle of skew Ang 0.00 deg.
8 Clear carriage way Bcw 7.5 m
9 Width of outer railing 0.00 m
10 Width of Footpath 0.00 m
11 Width of Crash Barrier Wkerb 0.45 m
12 Spacing of main girder c/c Spmg 3.00 m
13 Spacing of cross girder c/c Spcg 9.50 m
14 Thk of deck slab Df 0.225 m
15 Thk of deck slab at overhang 0.35 m
16 Thk of wearing coat Wc 0.065 m
17 Length of cantilever Lcan 1.20 m
18 Cantilever slab thk at fixed end Dcan1 0.35 m
19 Cantilever slab thk at free end Dcan2 0.20 m
20 No of main girder Nomg 3.00 Nos
21 Depth of (excluding slab) girder Dmg 1.350 m
22 Flange width of girder bf 0.900 m
23 Web thk of girder at mid span bw 0.300 m
24 Web thk of girder at Support 0.600 m
25 Thickness of cast in situ flange Df 0.000 m
26 Thickness of top haunch at midspan 0.150 m
Thickness of top haunch at support 0.075 m
27 Bottom width of flange 0.600 m
28 Thickness of bottom flange 0.250 m
29 Thickness of bottom haunch Bbw 0.150 m
30 Length of varying portion Lwv 1.000 m
31 Length of solid portion Lwu 1.200 m
32 No of Intermediate cross girder Nocg 1.00
33 Depth of Int. cross girder 1.325 m
34 Depth of End. cross girder 1.325 m
35 Web thk of Intermediate cross girder bwcg 0.30 m
36 Web thk of end cross girder 0.40 m
37 Grade of concrete Cgrade M30 Mpa
38 Grade of reinforcement Sgrade Fe 500 Mpa
39 Shape Factor λ for rectangular stress block λ 0.80 IRC-112-Anexure A2- A2.9(2)
40 strength Factor h h 1.00 IRC-112-Anexure A2- A2.9(2)
41 Partial factor of safety (Basic and seismic) ɣc 1.50 IRC-112-Cl 6.4.2.8
42 Partial factor of safety Accidental ɣc 1.20 IRC-112-Cl 6.4.2.8
Coefficient to consider the influence of the
α 0.67
43 strength
Design value of concrete comp strength for
44 Basic and seismic f cd 13.40 Mpa
Design value of concrete comp strength for
45 Accidental f cd 16.75 Mpa
46 Clear cover cov 40.0 mm
47 Unit weight of dry concrete wcon 2.50 t/m3
48 Unit weight of wet concrete 2.50 t/m3 cast in situ construction
49 Weight of wearing course wwc 0.20 t/m2 for design
50 Weight of Crash Barrier wrail 1.00 t/m
51 Weight of Railing 0.00 t/m
52 Intensity of Load for shuttering 0.00 t/m2 taken by staging
53 Stress in concrete (compression) f ck 30 Mpa
Limiting Strain in concrete = 0.0035
54 Stress in steel (tension) f yk 500 Mpa
55 Partial factor of safety for basic and seismic gs 1.15 IRC-112 Fig 6.3 (Note)
Partial factor of safety for Accidental gs 1.00 IRC-112 Fig 6.3 (Note)
56 E cm 31000 Mpa
57 Es 200000 Mpa
58 Modular ratio m 6.452
59 Diameter of bar to be used for shear stirrups mm 16.00
60 Constant as per cl. 10.3.1 of IRC 112 a cw 1.00 For no axial force
Strength reduction factor for concrete
61 cracked in shear V1 0.60 For f ck <= 80MPa
Ratio of the longitudinal force in the new
b
62 concrete and the total logitudinal force 1.00
Factor depends on the roughness of the
m
63 interface 0.70
64 Angle of the reinforcement to the interface a 90.000

0
65 Creep coefficient 1.55

66 Coefficient of thermal expansion a o
0.0000117 (/ C)
345
2.0 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Structural Strength As per IRC:6-2010 Table 3.2
Ultimate Limit State

Basic Accidental Seismic
Loads
Combination Combination Combination
1 2 3 4
Permanent Loads:
Dead load,Snow load if present,SIDL except surfacing
a) Adding to the effect of variable loads 1.35 1.00 1.35
b) Relieving the effect of variable load 1.00 1.00 1.00
Surfacing
Adding to the effect of variable loads 1.75 1.00 1.75
Relieving the effect of variable loads 1.00 1.00 1.00
Prestress and Secondary effect of prestress

(refer note no. 2)
Back fill Weight 1.50 1.00 1.00
Earth pressure due to Back Fill

a) Leading load 1.50 - 1.00
b) Accompany load 1.00 1.00 1.00
Variable Loads
Carriageway Live Load and associated loads (braking,
tractive and centrifugal forces) and
Pedestrain Live load :
a) Leading load 1.50 0.75 0.00
c) Construction Live Load 1.35 1.00 1.00
Wind during service and construction

a) Leading load 1.50 - -
b) Accompanying load 0.90 - -
Live load Surcharge (as accompanying load) 1.20 0.20 0.20
Erection effects 1.00 1.00 1.00
Accidental Effects:
i) Vehicle Collision (or)
ii) Barge Impact (or) - 1.00 -
iii) Impact due to floating bodies
Seismic Effect
a) During Service - - 1.50
b) During Construction - - 0.75
Hydraulic Loads (Accompanying Load)
Water current Forces 1.00 1.00 1.00

Water Pressure 1.00 1.00 1.00
Hydrodynamic effect - - 1.00
Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 0.15
346
3.0 Partial Safety Factor for Verification of Servicibility Limit State As per IRC:6-2010 Table 3.3

Frequent Quasi-permanent
Loads Rare Combination
combination Combination
1 2 3 4
Permanent Loads:
Dead load,Snow load if present , SIDL including surfacing 1.00 1.00 1.00
Back fill Weight 1.00 1.00 1.00
Prestress and secondary effect of prestress

(refer note no. 4)
Shrinkage and Creep Effect 1.00 1.00 1.00
Earth pressure due to Back Fill 1.00 1.00 1.00
Settlement Effects 1.00 1.00 1.00

a) Adding to the permanent load 0.00 0.00 0.00
b)Opposing the permanent loads.
Variable loads:
Carriageway Live Load and associated loads (braking,
tractive and centrifugal forces) and
Pedestrain Live load :
a) Leading load 1.00 0.75 -
Thermal Loads
a)Leading Load 1.00 0.60 -
b) Accompanying Load 0.60 0.50 0.50
Wind
a)Leading Load 1.00 0.60 -
b) Accompanying Load 0.60 0.50 0.00
Live load Surcharge (Accompanying Load) 0.80 0.00 0.00
Hydraulic Loads (Accompanying Load):

Water current Forces 1.00 1.00 -
Wave Pressure 1.00 1.00 -
Buoyancy 0.15 0.15 0.15
347
The analysis and design of RCC-T girder Superstructure consists of design of following parts of superstructure :
1. Design of Longitudinal Girders : BM, SF are obtained from excel sheets & grillage analysis.
2. Design of Intermediate Cross Girder : BM,SF are obtained from grillage analysis.
3. Design of End Cross Girder : BM,SF are obtained from grillage analysis.
4. Transverse analysis of superstructure : Forces are obtained from STAAD analysis and excel sheets
Grillage Analysis for Design of Longitudinal Girder and Cross Girders
The structural Modelling of the Cast in situ RCC T Girder superstructure is carried out by using grillage. The analysis has been
carried out using STAAD PRO. The structural model with beam & node no is presented Below.
Grillage Model with Beam Number
348
Grillage Model with Node Number
349
Following sheets presents calculation of section properties for INPUT in STAAD grillage model
A) Longitudinal Inner Girder-Midspan Section
3.000 m beff = ∑beff i+bw<b

0.900 m beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.225 b1= 1.35
0.000 m 0.150 beff = 4.640 m [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
beff adopted 3.000 m
1.350 0.300
Y Modulus of Elasticity of Deck Slab = 31000 MPa

0.15 Modulus of Elasticity of Girder = 31000 MPa
0.25
0.600
2 2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay
1. Deck Slab 0.6750 1.4625 0.9872 1.4438 0.0028 1.4466
2. Rctangular top Flange 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
3. Triangular top Flange 0.0450 1.3000 0.0585 0.0761 0.0001 0.0761
4. Web + top & bottom rec. Haunch 0.4050 0.6750 0.2734 0.1845 0.0615 0.2460
5. Bottom Bulb, Triangle 0.0225 0.3000 0.0068 0.0020 0.0000 0.0021
6. Bottom Bulb, Rectangle 0.0750 0.1250 0.0094 0.0012 0.0004 0.0016
Composite Section S 1.2225 1.3352 1.7075 0.0648 1.7724
Girder Only S 0.5475 0.3480 0.2638 0.0620 0.3258
SA SAy SAy2 S Io S (Io + Ay2)
Section Properties of Composite Section

Effective Area SA = 1.2225 m2
Distance of cg from bottom fibre (Y) Y =S(A.y) / SA = 1.0922 m
4
Moment of inertia (Iz) = S(Io+A.y2)-SA.Y2 = 0.3141 m
Ztop = 0.6506 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.2876 m
350
B) Longitudinal Inner Girder-Support Section

0.900 m beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.225 b1= 1.2
0.000 m 0.075 beff = 4.880 m [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
OR 3.000 m
1.350 m 0.600 m

0.00
0.600 m
2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay2
1. Deck Slab 0.6750 1.4625 0.9872 1.4438 0.0028 1.4466
Girder Only S 0.8213 0.5617 0.3888 0.1230 0.5118

Moment of inertia (Iz) = S(Io+A.y2)-SA.Y2 = 0.3552 m4
Ztop = 0.6579 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.3431 m
351
C) Longitudinal Outer Girder-Midspan Section
beff = ∑beff i+bw<b
2.700 m beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.900 m b1= 1.05
0.225 b2= 1.35
0.000 m 0.150 beff1 = 2.11 [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
Beff2= 2.17
∑Beff 4.580 m
1.350 0.300 m OR 2.700 m

0.25
0.600 m
2 2
1. Deck Slab 0.60750 1.46250 0.88847 1.2994 0.00256 1.3019
Girder Only S 0.54750 0.34800 0.2638 0.062 0.32576
2
SA SAy SAy S Io S (Io + Ay2)

Ztop = 0.6027 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.2840 m
2
Area of cross girder = 0.4050 m
Section Properties of Girder Only

Ztop = 0.1464 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.1645 m
Perimeter in contact with atmosphere = 8.295 m
352
D) Longitudinal Outer Girder-Support Section
beff = ∑beff i+bw<b
2.700 m beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.900 m b1= 0.9
0.225 b2= 1.2
0.000 m 0.075 beff1 = 2.08 [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
Beff2= 2.14
∑Beff 4.820 m
1.350 0.600 m Actual flange width 2.700 m

0.00
0.600 m
2 2
1. Deck Slab 0.60750 1.46250 0.88847 1.29939 0.002563 1.30195
Girder Only S 0.82125 0.56166 0.3888 0.123 0.51183

2
Moment of inertia (Iz) = S(Io+A.y )-SA.Y
2
= 0.3420 m4
Ztop = 0.6106 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.3369 m
2
Area of cross girder = 0.4050 m
Section Properties of Girder Only

Ztop = 0.1917 m3
3
Zbottom = 0.1867 m
353
E) End Cross Girder Section:
0.586 lo= 2.1

0.290 0.400 0.600 beff = ∑beff i+bw<b
0.225 beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.250 0.025 0.7*2.65/10+ 0.290 [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
0.4 1.000
beff1 = 0.268
1.325 0.4 Distance of transverse grid line
from c/l of End Diaph. = 1.200
Y Beff2= 0.41 =
∑Beff 1.078 m
Actual flange width 1.690 m
Modulus of Elasticity of Deck Slab = 31000 MPa
Modulus of Elasticity of Girder = 31000 MPa
2
SL.No. A y Ay Ay Io Io + Ay2
1. Deck Slab 0.13174 1.43750 0.18937 0.27222 0.000556 0.27278

4. Web + top rec. Haunch 0.43000 0.66250 0.28488 0.18873 0.077540 0.26627

Girder Only S 0.44225 0.30097 0.2099 0.078 0.28743
2
SA SAy SAy S Io S (Io + Ay2)

2
Area SA = 0.5740 m
4
354
F) Intermediate Cross Girder Section:
lo= = 9.000
0.000 m beff i= 0.2b1+0.1Lo<= 0.2Lo
0.225 b1= 1.35
0.000 0 beff = 2.64 [ Cl. 7.6.1.2 IRC 112 ]
Actual provided 3.000 m
1.325 0.30

Modulus of Elasticity of Girder = 31000 MPa
SL.No. A y Ay Ay2 Io Io + Ay
2
1. Deck Slab 0.15098 1.43750 0.21703 0.31198 0.000637 0.31261

4. Web + top rec. Haunch 0.33000 0.66250 0.21863 0.14484 0.058155 0.20299

Girder Only S 0.33000 0.21863 0.1448 0.058 0.20299
SA SAy SAy2 S Io
2
S (Io + Ay )

2
Area SA = 0.4810 m
4
355
F) Summary of Member Properties:
i) Longitudinal Girder Alone Mispan Support

Area = 0.548 0.821 Sqm
ii) Longitudinal Inner Girder Composite

Mispan Support
Area = 1.223 1.496 Sqm
MOI about Z (STAAD Axis) = 0.314 0.355 m4
iii) Longitudinal Outer Girder Composite

Mispan Support
Area = 1.155 1.429 Sqm
MOI about Z (STAAD Axis) = 0.304 0.342 m4
iv) End Cross Girder Area = 0.9360 Sqm

4
MOI about Z (STAAD Axis) = 0.4103 m
v) Intermediate Cross Girder Area = 0.7603 Sqm

4
MOI about Z (STAAD Axis) = 0.3550 m
Recapitulation of Member Propoerties with Staad Member Nos:
Longitudinal Members
Properties
Member Description
Ax Ix Iy** Iz
*Longitudinal Members along Outer Girder
At Support 1.4288 0.0001 0.379 0.3420
In Tapered Portion 1.2919 0.0001 0.371 0.3230
In Span 1.1550 0.0001 0.362 0.3040
*Longitudinal Members along Inner Girder
At Support 1.4963 0.0001 0.505 0.3552
In Tapered Portion 1.3594 0.0001 0.4975 0.3346
In Span 1.2225 0.0001 0.490 0.3141
** IY is assumed higher since deck slab will produce higher IY value.
356
Calculation of Loads for Application in Grillage Analysis
A. Dead Load
Density of Concrete = 2.50 t/Cum

Density of green Concrete = 2.50 t/Cum
2
Shuttering load = 0.00 t/m
A1. Dead Load of Girder
Self weight of girder applied in staad directly = 1.344 t/m
B. Superimposed Dead Load
Intensity of wearing coat = 0.20 t/sqm

Load due to crash barrier = 1.00 t/m
Width of Raised Kerb of RCC railing = 0.00 m
Depth of Kerb = 0.00 m
Height of steel railing = 0.00 m
Weight due to RCC railing = 0.00 t/m
WC
Load on Member 201 to 223 = -0.440 t/m
Load on end Member 400 to 423 = 0.440 t/m
Load on intermediate Member 300 to 323 = 0.600 t/m
Crash barrier
Load on End Member 200 to 223 = 1.000 t/m
Load on Member 400 to 423 = 1.000 t/m
357
Summary of BM and SF for different load cases (Unfactored)
Summary of B.M & SF due to Dead Load ( Forces due to Self weight of girder) kN-m
Summary of B.M & SF per girder due to Dead Load ( Forces due to Self weight of girder including
Deck slab concrete )
Web
1/8th 1/4th 3/8th Mid
Girder No Components Support widening
span span span span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in kNm 241.0 487.0 525.0 910.0 1095.0 1148.0
Long Member ) SF in kN 250.0 219.0 177.0 135.0 119.0 0.0
G2 ( Staad BM in kNm 250.0 508.0 535.0 951.0 1099.0 1200.0
Long Member ) SF in Kn 267.0 229.0 185.0 148.0 125.0 0.0
Summary of B.M & SF per girder due to SIDL(Crash barrier)
Web
span span span span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 39.9 93.8 148.0 181.0 221.0 246.0
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 24.0 35.3 48.1 62.5 67.5 71.2
Summary of B.M & SF per girder due to SIDL(Wearing coat)

Web
span span span span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 26.1 30.5 60.8 113.0 129.0 142.0
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 28.1 32.1 68.6 132.0 153.0 148.0

Summary of B.M & SF per girder due to Live Load Impact Factor = 1.180
A) Girder G1 ( Staad Long Member B) **10% reduction is considered forLL4, LL5 & LL6 for 3Lane loading
Web
Load Case Components Support widening
span span span span
end
BM in Knm 275.0 550.0 700.0 1005.0 1200.0 1259.0
LL1(70 RW)
SF in Kn 286.0 235.0 219.0 156.0 125.0 93.9
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(2LCA)
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BM in Knm 162.0 332.0 492.0 635.0 830.0 875.00
LL3(1 CLA)
SF in Kn 187.0 146.0 129.0 110.0 68.9 68.9
Design Live BM in Knm 324.5 649.0 826.0 1185.9 1416.0 1485.6
Load with
SF in Kn 337.5 277.3 258.4 184.1 147.5 110.8
impact
**10% reduction is considered forLL4, LL5 & LL6 for 3Lane loading
B) Girder G2 ( Staad Long Member C) Impact Factor = 1.180
Web
span span span span
end
BM in Knm 283.0 594.0 889.0 1100.0 1247.0 1383.0
LL1(70 RW)
SF in Kn 382.0 296.0 258.0 223.0 192.0 129.0
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2(2LCA)
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL3(1 CLA)
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Load with SF in Kn 450.8 349.3 304.4 263.1 226.6 152.2
358
Final Bending Moments & Shear Forces (Unfactored)
A) For Girder G1
Web
span span span span
end
BM in Knm 241.0 487.0 525.0 910.0 1095.0 1148.0
DL
SF in Kn 250.0 219.0 177.0 135.0 119.0 0.0
SIDL(crash BM in Knm 39.9 93.8 148.0 181.0 221.0 246.0
barrier) SF in Kn 55.4 48.0 39.5 22.0 13.1 0.0
SIDL(Wearing BM in Knm 26.1 30.5 60.8 113.0 129.0 142.0
coat) SF in Kn 30.1 26.3 20.6 16.0 11.4 2.3
BM in Knm 324.5 649.0 826.0 1185.9 1416.0 1485.6
Live Load
SF in Kn 337.5 277.3 258.4 184.1 147.5 110.8
BM in Knm 631.5 1260.3 1559.8 2389.9 2861.0 3021.6
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 673.0 570.6 495.5 357.1 291.0 113.1
Maximum BM in Knm 631.5 1260.3 1559.8 2389.9 2861.0 3021.6
Forces SF in Kn 673.0 570.6 495.5 357.1 291.0 113.1
B) For Girder G2
Web
span span span span
end
BM in Knm 250.0 508.0 535.0 951.0 1099.0 1200.0
DL
SF in Kn 267.0 229.0 185.0 148.0 125.0 0.0
SIDL(crash BM in Knm 24.0 35.3 48.1 62.5 67.5 71.2
barrier) SF in Kn 9.2 8.5 4.2 2.4 2.0 0.0
SIDL(Wearing BM in Knm 28.1 32.1 68.6 132.0 153.0 148.0
coat) SF in Kn 36.8 31.9 25.7 20.0 14.2 2.8
BM in Knm 283.0 594.0 889.0 1100.0 1247.0 1631.9
Live Load
SF in Kn 450.8 349.3 304.4 263.1 226.6 152.2
BM in Knm 585.1 1169.4 1540.7 2245.5 2566.5 3051.1
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 763.8 618.6 519.3 433.5 367.8 155.1
Maximum BM in Knm 585.1 1169.4 1540.7 2245.5 2566.5 3051.1
Forces SF in Kn 763.8 618.6 519.3 433.5 367.8 155.1
Since design have to be done for the worst forces on all the four girders and reinforcement required from the
worst BM & SF will be provided for all girders.
E) Final Design Forces Among all the Girders
Web
span span span span
end
Maximum BM in Knm 631.5 1260.3 1559.8 2389.9 2861.0 3051.1
Forces SF in Kn 763.8 618.6 519.3 433.5 367.8 155.1
The design has been done with properties of inner girder since properties of inner girder is less than outer girder.
359
Summary of BM and SF for different load cases ( Factored - ULS Case)
Summary of B.M & SF per girder due to Dead Load ( Forces due to Self weight of girder,Deck slab )
Web
Mid
Girder No Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span
span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 325.4 657.5 708.8 1228.5 1478.3 1549.8
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 337.5 685.8 722.3 1283.9 1483.7 1620.0
Summary of Factored B.M & SF per girder due to SIDL (Includes crash barrier and wearing coat load )
Web
Mid
Girder No Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span
span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 99.5 180.0 306.2 442.1 524.1 580.6
Long Member SF in Kn 127.5 110.8 89.4 57.7 37.6 4.0
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 81.6 103.8 185.0 315.4 358.9 355.1
Summary of Factored B.M & SF per girder due to Live Load

A) Girder G1 - Outer
Web
Mid
Load Case Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span
span
end
BM in Knm 412.5 825.0 1050.0 1507.5 1800.0 1888.5
LL1
SF in Kn 429.0 352.5 328.5 234.0 187.5 140.9
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BM in Knm 243.0 498.0 738.0 952.5 1245.0 1312.5
LL3
SF in Kn 280.5 219.0 193.5 165.0 103.4 103.4
Load with
SF in Kn 429.0 352.5 328.5 234.0 187.5 140.9
impact
360
B) Girder G2 - Inner
Web
Mid
span
end
BM in Knm 424.5 891.0 1333.5 1650.0 1870.5 2074.5
LL1
SF in Kn 573.0 444.0 387.0 334.5 288.0 193.5
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL3
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Load with
SF in Kn 573.0 444.0 387.0 334.5 288.0 193.5
impact
Final Bending Moments & Shear Forces (Factored ULS Stage)
A) For Girder G1
Web
Mid
span
end
BM in Knm 325.4 657.5 708.8 1228.5 1478.3 1549.8
DL
SF in Kn 337.5 295.7 239.0 182.3 160.7 0.0
BM in Knm 99.5 180.0 306.2 442.1 524.1 580.6
SIDL
SF in Kn 127.5 110.8 89.4 57.7 37.6 4.0
BM in Knm 412.5 825.0 1050.0 1507.5 1800.0 1888.5
Live Load
SF in Kn 429.0 352.5 328.5 234.0 187.5 140.9
BM in Knm 837.4 1662.5 2065.0 3178.1 3802.4 4018.9
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 894.0 759.0 656.8 474.0 385.8 144.9
Design BM in Knm 837.4 1662.5 2065.0 3178.1 3802.4 4018.9
Forcees SF in Kn 894.0 759.0 656.8 474.0 385.8 144.9
B) For Girder G2
Web
Mid
span
end
BM in Knm 337.5 685.8 722.3 1283.9 1483.7 1620.0
DL
SF in Kn 360.5 309.2 249.8 199.8 168.8 0.0
BM in Knm 81.6 103.8 185.0 315.4 358.9 355.1
SIDL
SF in Kn 76.8 67.2 50.6 38.2 27.6 5.0
BM in Knm 424.5 891.0 1333.5 1650.0 1870.5 2074.5
Live Load
SF in Kn 573.0 444.0 387.0 334.5 288.0 193.5
BM in Knm 843.6 1680.6 2240.7 3249.2 3713.0 4049.6
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 1010.3 820.4 687.3 572.5 484.3 198.5
Design BM in Knm 843.6 1680.6 2240.7 3249.2 3713.0 4049.6
Forcees SF in Kn 1010.3 820.4 687.3 572.5 484.3 198.5
Web
Mid
span
end
Design BM in Knm 843.6 1680.6 2240.7 3249.2 3802.4 4049.6
Forcees SF in Kn 1010.3 820.4 687.3 572.5 484.3 198.5
The design has been done with properties of inner girder since properties of inner girder is less than outer girder.
361
Summary of BM and SF for different load cases ( Factored - SLS Case)
Summary of Factored B.M & SF per girder due to Dead Load ( Forces due to Self weight of girder,Deck slab )
Web
Girder No Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span Mid span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 241.0 487.0 525.0 910.0 1095.0 1148.0
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 250.0 508.0 535.0 951.0 1099.0 1200.0
Summary of Factored B.M & SF per girder due to SIDL

Web
Girder No Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span Mid span
end
G1 ( Staad BM in Knm 66.0 124.3 208.8 294.0 350.0 388.0
G2 ( Staad BM in Knm 52.1 67.4 116.7 194.5 220.5 219.2
Summary of Factored B.M & SF per girder due to Live Load

A) Girder G1
Web
Load Case Components Support widening 1/8th span 1/4th span 3/8th span Mid span
end
BM in Knm 275.0 550.0 700.0 1005.0 1200.0 1259.0
LL1
SF in Kn 286.0 235.0 219.0 156.0 125.0 93.9
BM in Knm 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
LL2
SF in Kn 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
BM in Knm 162.0 332.0 492.0 635.0 830.0 875.0
LL3
SF in Kn 187.0 146.0 129.0 110.0 68.9 68.9
Load with SF in Kn 286.0 235.0 219.0 156.0 125.0 93.9
362
B) Girder G2
Web
end
BM in Knm 283.00 594.00 889.00 1100.00 1247.00 1383.00
LL1
SF in Kn 382.00 296.00 258.00 223.00 192.00 129.00
BM in Knm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL2
SF in Kn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
BM in Knm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
LL3
SF in Kn 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Load with SF in Kn 382.0 296.0 258.0 223.0 192.0 129.0
Final Bending Moments & Shear Forces
A) For Girder G1
Web
end
BM in Knm 241.0 487.0 525.0 910.0 1095.0 1148.0
DL
SF in Kn 250.0 219.0 177.0 135.0 119.0 0.0
BM in Knm 66.0 124.3 208.8 294.0 350.0 388.0
SIDL
SF in Kn 85.5 74.3 60.1 38.0 24.5 2.3
BM in Knm 275.0 550.0 700.0 1005.0 1200.0 1259.0
Live Load
SF in Kn 286.0 235.0 219.0 156.0 125.0 93.9
BM in Knm 582.0 1161.3 1433.8 2209.0 2645.0 2795.0
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 621.5 528.3 456.1 329.0 268.5 96.2
Design BM in Knm 582.0 1161.3 1433.8 2209.0 2645.0 2795.0
Forcees SF in Kn 621.5 528.3 456.1 329.0 268.5 96.2
B) For Girder G2
Web
end
BM in Knm 250.0 508.0 535.0 951.0 1099.0 1200.0
DL
SF in Kn 267.0 229.0 185.0 148.0 125.0 0.0
BM in Knm 52.1 67.4 116.7 194.5 220.5 219.2
SIDL
SF in Kn 46.0 40.4 29.9 22.4 16.2 2.8
BM in Knm 283.0 594.0 889.0 1100.0 1247.0 1383.0
Live Load
SF in Kn 382.0 296.0 258.0 223.0 192.0 129.0
BM in Knm 585.1 1169.4 1540.7 2245.5 2566.5 2802.2
DL+SIDL+LL
SF in Kn 695.0 565.4 472.9 393.4 333.2 131.8
Design BM in Knm 585.1 1169.4 1540.7 2245.5 2566.5 2802.2
Forcees SF in Kn 695.0 565.4 472.9 393.4 333.2 131.8
Since design have to be done for the worst forces on all the four girders and reinforcement required from the worst
BM & SF will be provided for all girders.
Web
end
Design BM in Knm 585.1 1169.4 1540.7 2245.5 2645.0 2802.2
Forcees SF in Kn 695.0 565.4 472.9 393.4 333.2 131.8
363
Calculation of Stresses Due to Temperature Gradient at Mid Span of Inner Girder
Total Height of the girder h = 1.575 m

C.G. of Girder from bottom Y = 0.932 m
4
M.O.I. of the Section I = 1.01 m
Area of the Section A = 1.63 m2
Grade of Concrete = 30
2
Modulus of Elasticity of Concrete Ec = 3.00E+07 KN/m
o
Coefficient of thermal expansion of concrete a = 0.000012 C
Section Modulus at the top of Slab ZTS = 1.5715 m3
3
Section Modulus at the top of Girder ZTG = 0.6413 m
Section Modulus at the bottom of Girder ZBG = 1.0834 m3
Temperature Rise Case
o
T1 = 17.8 C h1 = 0.15 m
o
T2 = 4.0 C h2 = 0.25 m
o
T3 = 2.1 C h3 = 0.15 m
17.8 3.000 m
0.15 Stress 0.900 m
1 6408.0 0.225
2 4.0 0.25 1440.0 0.000 0.15
1.575 1.425
1.03
Y
0.20
3 0.15 756.0 0.25
2.1 0.6
Section of Girder at Span
Stress due to Stress due to

y Assuming End
Height Stress b Force e Moment release of release of Final Stress Final Stress
Segment from top Restrained
Axial Force Moment
m KN/m2 m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 t/m2
1 0.150 6408.0 3.000 1765.80 0.059 0.584 1030.41 6408.00 -1335.75 -722.19 4350.1 435.0
2 0.075 1440.0 3.000 275.40 0.185 0.457 125.97 1440.00 -1335.75 -208.21 -104.0 -10.4
3 0.175 1008.0 0.900 79.38 0.283 0.359 28.53 1008.00 -1335.75
4 0.150 756.0 1.000 56.70 1.525 -0.882 -50.03 756.00 -1335.75 1047.57 467.8 46.8
2177.28 1134.89
26 364
Temperature Fall Case
10.6 Stress h = 1.575 m

1 0.250 -3816.0
o
2 0.7 0.2 -252.0 h1 = 0.250 m T1 = 10.6 C
o
h2 = 0.200 m T2 = 0.7 C
o
h3 = 0.200 m T3 = 0.8 C
o
h4 = 0.250 m T4 = 6.6 C
0.675
3 0.8 0.2 -288.0

4 0.250 -2376.0
6.6
Stress due to Stress due to

y Assuming End
Height Stress b Force e Moment release of release of Final Stress Final Stress
Segment from top Restrained
Axial Force Moment
m KN/m2 m KN m m KNm KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 KN/m2 t/m2
1 0.150 -3816.0 3.000 -915.30 0.053 0.590 -539.68 -3816.00 797.41 159.82 -2858.8 -285.9
2 0.200 -252.0 0.900 -22.68 0.250 0.393 -8.91 -252.00 797.41 391.65 937.1 93.7
3 0.000 -252.0 0.900 0.00 0.350 0.293 0.00 -252.00 797.41
4 0.000 0.0 1.425 0.00 0.350 0.293 0.00 0.00 797.41
5 0.200 -288.0 1.000 -28.80 1.258 -0.616 17.73 -288.00 797.41
4 0.250 -2376.0 1.000 -333.00 1.483 -0.840 279.70 -2376.00 797.41 -231.83 -1810.4 -181.0
-1299.78 -251.15
27 365
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder (Ultimate Limit State ) at L/2 Section
Input for steel to be provided
Layer Dia of Bar No.of Bars CGfrom bot.
1st 25 5 69 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm
4th 25 5 219 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm
6th 25 0 319 mm
7th 25 0 369 mm
Total 20 144 mm
Area of bottom steel = 9817.48 mm^2
7.1.2 STRESS CHECK FOR RCC GIRDER WITH RCC SLAB (Ultimate Load case)
(DL ,SIDL, Live load )
D1
bf Bending Moment = 4049.62 KN-m
D2
Width of Slab W = 2700mm
N N Depth of slab T = 225mm
Width of top flange bf = 900mm
bw d Width of bottom flange bwf = 600mm
Width of web bw = 300mm
Thickness of top flange D1 = 0mm
D3 Thickness of top haunch D2 = 150mm
Thickness of bottom haunch D3 = 150mm
D4
Thickness of bottom flange D4 = 250mm
bwf Depth of girder D = 1575mm
Effective depth of girder d = 1432mm
Depth of neutral axis Xu = 146mm OK
Summary of Steel Provided
Layer Dia of Bar No.of Bars CGfrom bot. Cover = 40.00 mm

1st 25 5 69 mm Dia of shear stirrup = 16.00 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm Grade of Concrete = 30.00
3rd 25 5 169 mm Reinforcement fyk = 500.00
4th 25 5 219 mm Shape factor λ = 0.80
5th 25 0 269 mm h = 1.00
6th 25 0 319 mm f cd = 13.40 Mpa
7th 25 0 369 mm gs = 1.15
Total 20 144 mm
From the strain diagram limiting conc strain is = 0.00350

Strain in steel (1431.5-145.7)/145.7*0.0035 = 0.03088
From the strain diagram X <= 1
d f yk 1
(gsEs ecu3)
= 0.617
366
Calculations of force and moment capacity of concrete
Section Area(mm^2) Cg from top(mm) Fc=ɳFcd*A(Kn) Moment=Fcd*Cg(KN-m)
deck slab 314794.851 60.627 4268.468 258.785 0.8*2700**145.738357015597
Top flange (D1) 0.000 148.295 0 0 0.8*2700**225
Haunch(D2) 0.00 0 0 0
Web 0.00 0.00 0 0
Total 314794.85 4268.468 258.785
Calculations of force and moment capacity for steel

Fs=fyk/ɣs*As 4268.468279 Kn 500/1.15*9,817.5/1000
Moment about top fibre 6110.312342 KN-m
Comparision of total compression= total tension FC= FT
Difference in compression and tension which has to be be Zero as mentioned above FC=FT 0.00KN
(Goal seek it to value
zero by changing Xu)
Taking moments about top of fibre gives moment of resistance

Mrd = 5851.53 kn-m OK
5851527.25
Shear Check as per IRC-112
V ED is ultimate design shear force in the section considered resulting from external loading = 198.5 KN
V Rd,c is the design shear reinforcement of the member without shear reinforcement
(0.12k (80r l f ck )1/3+ k 1 s cp)b w d [ Clause 10.3.2]
subject to a minimum of (ν min + 0.15 s cp )b w d ved = VED/(b*0.9d) 0.51
Where
K= 1+ sqrt(200/d) <=2.0 = 1.374 Hence OK
f ck is the concrete cylinder strength in MPA = M30 Mpa
r = A sl /b w d <=0.02 = 0.02000
Asl is the area of longitudinal tensile reinforcement which extends a minimum of design = 9817.5 mm2
anchorage length and an effective depth beyond the section considered
bw is the smallest width of cross-section in the tensile zone = 300.00 mm
d effective depth of tensile reinforcement = 1431.5 mm
s cp N ED /A c (in MPA) = 0
N ED is the axial forcein the cross-section from the loading = 0
Ac is the gross concrete cross-section area = NA
ν min = 0.031K 3/2 f ck 1/2 = 0.273

(νmin + 0.15scp)bwd 0.273*300*1431.5/1000 = 117.4 kN
Thus ignoring any axial load V Rd,c = 256.96 KN
a cw is a co-efficient taking in to account of the state of the stress in the compressive chord = 1.000
where scp = 0
scp = is the mean compressive stress, measured positive in the concrete
due to the design axial force
V1 is the strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear = 0.600
V 1 = 0.6 for f ck <= 80MPa
V 1 = 0.9-f ck /250 for f ck => 80MPa
Z lever arm can be taken as 0.9d for R.C . Section and to be calculated for PSC section = 1288.4 mm
367
f cd 0.135fck (1- fck/310) 3.66 = 13.400 Mpa
q = 21.80 0.0924fck (1- fck/310) 2.50 cot q = 2.50
Max allowble shear in onc strut 45 tan q = 0.40
bw = 300 mm
V RD.max design value of maximum shear force a cw b w z v 1 f cd / (cot q +tan q ) = 1071.5 KN
Hence Ok
Checking of shear reinforcement Clause 10.3.3.2
Asw >= V Rd,s
s zf ywd cot q
V RD.s design value of the shear force which can be sustained by the yielding reinforcement = 198.5
f ywd is the design yeild strength of the shear reinforcement = 0.8*f ywk = 347.8 Mpa
V Rd,s = 0.177 mm2/mm

zf ywd cot q
Provide 2L 10 f @ 200 mm c/c
A sw provided = 157.08 mm2/m
A sw / s = 0.7854 mm2/mm
Hence OK
Interface Shear Clause 10.3.4
The interface shear stress should satisfy the following

V Edi <=V Rdi
Where
V Edi is the interface shear stress = b V ED /z bi = 0.1249 Mpa
b is the retio of the longitudinal force in the new concrete and the = 1.0000
total logitudinal force
V ED is the vertical shear force (DL of Slab + SIDL + LL) = 144.86 KN
Z is the lever arm = 1288.4 mm
bi is the width of interface = 900.00 mm
V Rdi is the resisting capacity at the section = = 0.2125 Hence Ok

m s n + r f yd [ m sin a +cos a ] <= 0.5vf cd
m factor depends on the roughness of the interface = 0.7000
sn Stress per unit area caused by the munimum external force across the interface = 0.0000
that can act simultaneously with the shear force, < 0.6*fcd
Can be irnored for conservative design
a is the angle of the reinforcement to the interface = 90.00 0
r= As/Aj where As is the area of reinforcement crossing the joint Aj is the = 0.00087
interface area of the joint
From the above formula it can be derived that

A s required = V EDi /mf yd *Ai = 461.79 mm2
Ai interface area of joint = 900000 mm2
As Provided 2L 10@ 200 mm c/c = 785.40 mm2

0L 12@ 200 mm c/c = 0.00 mm2
Hence OK
368
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder (Ultimate Limit State ) at 3L/8
1st 25 5 69 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm
4th 25 5 219 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm
6th 25 0 319 mm
7th 25 0 369 mm
Total 20 144 mm
7.1.2 STRESS CHECK FOR RCC GIRDER WITH RCC SLAB (Ultimate Load case)
(DL ,SIDL, Live load )
D1
D2
D4

5th 25 0 269 mm h = 1.00
6th 25 0 319 mm f cd = 13.40 Mpa
7th 25 0 369 mm gs = 1.15
Total 20 144 mm

Strain in steel = 0.03088
d f yk 1
(gsEs ecu3)
= 0.617
369
deck slab 314794.85 60.62715652 4268.468279 258.7850945
Top flange (D1) 0.00 148.2953428 0 0
Haunch(D2) 0.00 0 0 0
Web 0.00 0.00 0 0
Total 314794.85 4268.468279 258.7850945

Fs=fyk/ɣs*As 4268.468279 Kn

Mrd = 5851.53 kn-m OK
subject to a minimum of (ν min + 0.15 s cp )b w d
Where
K= 1+ sqrt(200/d) <=2.0 = 1.374 Hence OK
r = A sl /b w d <=0.02 = 0.02000
ν min = 0.031K 3/2 f ck 1/2 = 0.2734

(νmin + 0.15scp)bwd = 117.4 kN
where scp = 0
s cp = is the mean compressive stress, measured positive in the concrete
V 1 = 0.6 for f ck <= 80MPa
V 1 = 0.9-f ck /250 for f ck => 80MPa
370
f cd = 13.400 Mpa
o
q = 45.00 cot q = 1.00
tan q = 1.00
bw = 300 mm
Hence Ok
Checking of shear reinforcement Clause
Asw >= V Rd,s
s zf ywd cot q
V Rd,s = 1.081 mm2/mm

zf ywd cot q
A sw / s = 1.1310 mm2/mm
Hence OK

V Edi <=V Rdi
Where

r = As/Aj where As is the area of reinforcement crossing the joint Aj is the = 0.00126


0L 12@ 200 mm c/c = 0.00 mm2
Hence OK
371
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder (Ultimate Limit State ) at L/4
1st 25 5 69 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm
4th 25 0 219 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm
6th 25 0 319 mm
7th 25 0 369 mm
Total 15 119 mm
7.1.2 STRESS CHECK FOR PRECAST RCC GIRDER WITH RCC SLAB (Ultimate Load case)
(Self weight beam, deck slab ,SIDL, Live load )
D1
D2
D4

5th 25 0 269 mm h = 1.00
6th 25 0 319 mm f cd = 13.40 Mpa
7th 25 0 369 mm gs = 1.15
Total 15 119 mm

d f yk 1
(gsEs ecu3)
= 0.617
372
deck slab 238906.81 44.24200124 3201.35121 141.6341842
Top flange (D1) 0.00 134.2420012 0 0
Haunch(D2) 0.00 0 0 0
Web 0.00 0.00 0 0
Total 238906.81 3201.35121 141.6341842


Mrd = 4521.13 kn-m OK
Where
K= 1+ sqrt(200/d) <=2.0 = 1.371 Hence OK
r = A sl /b w d <=0.02 = 0.02000
ν min = 0.031K 3/2 f ck 1/2 = 0.27244

where scp = 0
V 1 = 0.6 for f ck <= 80MPa
V 1 = 0.9-f ck /250 for f ck => 80MPa
373
f cd = 13.400 Mpa
o
q = 45.00 cot q = 1.00
tan q = 1.00
bw = 300 mm
Hence Ok
Asw >= V Rd,s
s zf ywd cot q
V Rd,s = 1.256 mm2/mm

zf ywd cot q
A sw / s = 1.2925 mm2/mm
Hence OK

V Edi <=V Rdi
Where



2L 0@ 175 mm c/c = 0.00 mm2
Hence OK
374
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder (Ultimate Limit State ) at L/8
1st 25 5 69 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm
4th 25 0 219 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm
6th 25 0 319 mm
7th 25 0 369 mm
Total 15 119 mm
D1
D2
D4

5th 25 0 269 mm h = 1.00
6th 25 0 319 mm f cd = 13.40 Mpa
7th 25 0 369 mm gs = 1.15
Total 15 119 mm

d f yk 1
(gsEs ecu3)
= 0.617
375
deck slab 238906.81 44.24200124 3201.35121 141.6341842
Top flange (D1) 0.00 134.2420012 0 0
Haunch(D2) 0.00 0 0 0
Web 0.00 0.00 0 0
Total 238906.81 3201.35121 141.6341842


Mrd = 4521.13 kn-m OK
Where
K= 1+ sqrt(200/d) <=2.0 = 1.371 Hence OK
r = A sl /b w d <=0.02 = 0.02000
ν min = 0.031K 3/2 f ck 1/2 = 0.27244

where scp = 0
V 1 = 0.6 for f ck <= 80MPa
V 1 = 0.9-f ck /250 for f ck => 80MPa
376
f cd = 13.400 Mpa
o
q = 45.00 cot q = 1.00
tan q = 1.00
bw = 300 mm
Hence Ok
Asw >= V Rd,s
s zf ywd cot q
V Rd,s = 1.507 mm2/mm

zf ywd cot q

2L 0 f @ 150 mm c/c
A sw / s = 1.5080 mm2/mm
Hence OK

V Edi <=V Rdi
Where



2L 0@ 125 mm c/c = 0.00 mm2
Hence OK
377
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder (Ultimate Limit State ) near support location
1st 25 5 69 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm
4th 25 0 219 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm
6th 25 0 319 mm
7th 25 0 369 mm
Total 15 119 mm
D1
D2
D4

5th 25 0 269 mm h = 1.00
6th 25 0 319 mm f cd = 13.40 Mpa
7th 25 0 369 mm gs = 1.15
Total 15 119 mm

Strain in steel (1231.5-110.6)/110.6*0.0035 = 0.03547
d f yk 1
(gsEs ecu3)
= 0.617
378
deck slab 238906.81 44.24200124 3201.35121 141.6341842
Top flange (D1) 0.00 134.2 0 0
Haunch(D2) 0.00 0.0 0 0
Web 0.00 0.0 0 0
Total 238906.81 3201.35121 141.6341842


Mrd = 3800.83 kn-m OK
Where
K= 1+ sqrt(200/d) <=2.0 = 1.403 Hence OK
r = A sl /b w d <=0.02 = 0.01850
ν min = 0.031K 3/2 f ck 1/2 = 0.28217

where scp = 0
V 1 = 0.6 for f ck <= 80MPa
V 1 = 0.9-f ck /250 for f ck => 80MPa
379
f cd = 13.400 Mpa
o
q = 45.00 cot q = 1.00
tan q = 1.00
bw = 600 mm
Hence Ok
Asw >= V Rd,s
s zf ywd cot q
V Rd,s = 2.621 mm2/mm

zf ywd cot q

2L 0 f @ 125 mm c/c
A sw / s = 3.2170 mm2/mm
Hence OK

V Edi <=V Rdi
Where



2L 0@ 125 mm c/c = 0.00 mm2
Hence OK
380
Design Check for Longitudinal Girder at 9.500 m
Design BM at Midspan due to Selfweight of girder = 415.25 Kn-M
Design BM at Midspan due to Deck Slab & Cross Girder = 760.45 Kn-M
Design BM at Midspan due to Deck Slab&Cross Girder (green concrete)+shuttering = 670.72 Kn-M
Design BM at Midspan due to SIDL = 388.00 Kn-M
Design BM at Midspan due to Live Load = 1259.00 Kn-M
Service stage moment = 1543.20 Kn-M
7.1.4 STRESS CHECK FOR RCC GIRDER WITH RCC SLAB

(DL+SIDL+ Live load)
W
Bending Moment = 2317.72 kN-m

T1
T2 N Width of Slab W = 2700 mm

Depth of slab T = 225 mm
Width of top flange WTF = 900 mm
Ww D Width of bottom flange WBF = 300 mm
d Width of web WW = 300 mm
Thickness of top flange T1 = 0 mm
Thickness of top haunch T2 = 150 mm
T3 Thickness of bottom haunch T3 = 150 mm
Thickness of bottom flange T4 = 250 mm
T4
Depth of girder D = 1575 mm
Effective depth of girder d = 1432 mm
WBF Depth of neutral axis N = 237 mm

Short term considered m 6.452
2
Layer Dia of Bar No.of Bars CGfrom bot. Area of beam above neutral axis = 610995 mm
1st 25 5 69 mm CG of beam above neutral axis = 124 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
3rd 25 5 169 mm Comparing moment of area about neutral axis
4th 25 5 219 mm W*T+WTF*T1*(N-T1*0.5)+WTF*T2*(N-2*T2*2/3)+(N-T1-T2)^2/2*WW
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
7th 25 0 369 mm Cracked Moment of Inertia = 1.02E+11 mm
Total 20 144 mm considered uncrack as per IRC 112
2
Area of bottom steel = 9817 mm
3
Cover = 40 mm Top Section Modulus at top of deck ZT = 4.33E+08 mm
Dia of shear stirrup = 16 mm
3
Grade of Concrete = M30 Bottom Section Modulus ZB = 8.58E+07 mm
Reinforcement = Fe500
Permissible stresses Stress in concrete at top of deck slab = 5.35 Mpa
In concrete = 14.40 Mpa
In steel = 300.00 Mpa Stress in concrete at girder top = 3.11 Mpa
Stress in Steel at CG = 174.35 Mpa
Stress in Steel at bottom fibre = 195.29 Mpa
Stress Due to Differential Shrinkage
Depth of precast girder = 1.5750 m

Area of Deck Slab = 0.6075 m2
Area of composite section = 1.2225 m2
Distance of c.g of Composite from top fiber = 0.7078 m
Distance of c.g of Composite from bottom fiber = 1.0922 m
4
Moment of Inertia = 0.3141 m
Zb = 0.2876 m3
Zts = 0.4438 m3
Ztg = 0.6506 m3
381
Age of girder at the time of casting of deck slab = 28 days
Age of deck slab = 0 days
Differential shrinkage coeffi 2.00E-04 - 2.00E-04 = 0.00000
Reduction Factor = 0.43
Modulus of elasticity of concrete = 3050000.00 t/m2
Force due to Differntial shrinkage(P) = (0*0.43*3050000*2700*225)
= 0.00 ton
Tensile stress in deck slab = 0.00 t/m2
Eccentricity(e) = ((1575+225*0.5)/1000-1.0922)
= 0.60 m
Moment due to above force = 0.00 tm
Stress due to Loads & Moments
Stress at top of slab = 0.00 t/m2 Compression
Stress at top of girder = 0.000 t/m2 Compression
Stress at bottom = 0.00 t/m2 Tension
Final Stress due to differential shrinkage
Stress at top of slab = 0.00 t/m2 Tension
Stress at bottom of slab = 0.00 t/m2 Tension
Stress at bottom of girder = 0.00 t/m2 Tension
Final Stress in concrete and steel
Stress in concrete at top of slab = 1.10 Mpa = 109.94512 t/m2
Stress in concrete at top of girder = 3.46 Mpa = 345.52806 t/m2
Stress in Steel at CG = 73.14 Mpa = 7313.9457 t/m2
Stress in Steel at bottom fibre = 82.37 Mpa = 8237.1442 t/m2
Summary of Stresses
Allowable flexural concrete Stress at Concrete = 1440 t/sqm OK

Allowable Tensile Stress at Steel = 30000 t/sqm OK
Rise Fall
Flexural concrete Stress at Concrete (Top of Deck) due to temperature = 392.7 -95.9
Flexural concrete Stress at Concrete (Top of beam) due to temperature = -111.2 55.5
Stress at Steel (Bottom of beam) due to temperature = 169.3 -115.8
Summary of stresses including temperature case
Deck slab +
DL Differential
Shuttering DL+SIDL+LL SIDL LL Temp RISE Temp Fall
Shrinkage Final Stresses
Top of deck 535 110 535 393 -96 0.0 1158

Top of Beam 0 0 311 56 311 -111 56 0.0 -50 OK
Beam Bottom 0 0 19529 3416 19529 169 -116 0.0 20282 OK
382
Crack width checking during SLS condition under Quasi-permanent Load combination IRC-112 Clause-12.3.4

(QUASI - PERMANENT STAGE - Dead load+ SIDL+Live LOad)
W
Bending Moment = 114 t-m

T1

T4
2
1st 25 5 69 mm CG of beam above neutral axis = 0.0 mm
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 20 144 mm
2
3
3
Reinforcement = 500
In steel = 300.0 Mpa Stress in Steel at CG = 132.83 Mpa
Maximum crack width
Wk = S r,max ( e sm - e cm ) = 0.171 Hence OK
S r,max = Maximum crack spacing 3.4c + 0.425k 1k 2j is applicable = 208.4 mm

r r .eff
where spacing of bonded reinforcement with in the tension zone <=5*(C+ j /2) = 262.5 mm
j = is the bar diameter.Where different diameters are used = 25 mm

in section an equivalent diameter canbe used j eq
C = Clear cover to longitudinal reinforcement = 40 mm
K1 = is the co-efficient which takes account of the bond properties = 0.8

of the bonded reinforcement
K2 = is a co-fficient which takes into account of the distribution of strain = 0.5
( e sm - e cm ) = s sc - k 1 f ct.eff / r r. eff (1+a e r r .eff ) = 0.000823

>=0.6 s sc / Es
Es
s sc = is the stress in the tension reinforcement assuming a cracked section ( stress increased) = 220.91 Mpa
ae = is the ratio Es/Ec = 6.452
r r. eff = A s /A c.eff = 0.0587
A c.eff = is the effective area of concrete in tension surrounding the reinforcement = 167142.9 mm2
of depth h c.eff , where h c.eff is the lesser of following
b = 300 mm
1 One third of the tension zone depth of the cracked section,(h-x)/3, h = 1800 mm
with x negative when whole section is in tension d = 1432 mm
x = 129 mm
2 half of section depth,h/2, or
3 2.5*(h-d)
As = Area of tension reinforcement = 9817 mm2
f ct.eff = is the mean value of the tensile strength of the concrete effective at the = 3.000 Mpa
time when the cracks may first be expected to occur f ct.eff = f ctm
383
7.1.4 STRESS CHECK FOR PRECAST RCC GIRDER WITH RCC SLAB
W
Bending Moment = 1200.00 Kn-m

T1

T4
2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 20 144 mm
2
3
3
384

Moment of Inertia = 0.3141 m4
Zb = 0.2876 m3
Zts = 0.4438 m3
Ztg = 0.6506 m3
Age of precast girder at the time of casting of deck slab = 28 days

= 0.00 ton
Eccentricity(e) = ((1575+225*0.5)/1000-1.0922)
= 0.60 m

Rise Fall
Flexural concrete Stress at Concrete (Top of DEck) due to temperature = 392.7 -95.9
385
DL DL Differential
DL+SIDL+LL SIDL LL Temp RISE Temp Fall
Top of deck #VALUE! 277.63 99 278 393 -96 0.0 901

Top of Beam 442 #VALUE! 161 51 161 -111 56 0.0 -200 OK
Beam Bottom 3225 #VALUE! 10110 3082 10110 169 -116 0.0 10863 OK

(SERVICE STAGE - Dead load+ SIDL+Live LOad)
W

T1

T4
2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 20 144 mm
2
3
3
Reinforcement = 500
386
Maximum crack width

r r .eff



>=0.6 s sc / Es
Es
s sc = is the stress in the tension reinforcement assuming a cracked section = 203.89 Mpa
r r. eff = A s /A c.eff = 0.0587
b = 300 mm
x = 129 mm
3 2.5*(h-d)
387
W

T1

T4
2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 15 119 mm
2
3
3

Zb = 0.2876 m3
Zts = 0.4438 m3
Ztg = 0.6506 m3
388
= 0.00 ton
Eccentricity(e) = ((1575+225*0.5)/1000-1.0922)
= 0.60 m

Rise Fall
Deck slab +
DL Differential
Top of deck 256.60 92 257 393 -96 0.0 880

Top of Beam 375 458 167 53 167 -111 56 0.0 -194 OK
Beam Bottom 3299 5253 10762 3318 10762 169 -116 0.0 11515 OK
389

W

T1

T4

2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 15 119 mm
2
3
3
Reinforcement = 500

Maximum crack width

r r .eff



>=0.6 s sc / Es
Es
r r. eff = A s /A c.eff = 0.0472
b = 300 mm
x = 240 mm
3 2.5*(h-d)
390
W

T1

T4
2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 15 119 mm
2
3
3
391

Zb = 0.2876 m3
Zts = 0.4438 m3
Ztg = 0.6506 m3

= 0.00 ton
Eccentricity(e) = ((1575+225*0.5)/1000-1.0922)
= 0.60 m

Rise Fall
Deck slab +
DL Differential
Top of deck 251.19 61 251 393 -96 0.0 874

Top of Beam 225 260 107 38 107 -111 56 0.0 -254 OK
Beam Bottom 2207 3452 6055 2418 6055 169 -116 0.0 6807 OK
392

W

T1

T4

2
2nd 25 5 119 mm
5th 25 0 269 mm = m*Ast*(d-N)
6th 25 0 319 mm
4
Total 15 119 mm
2
3
3
Reinforcement = 500

Maximum crack width

r r .eff



>=0.6 s sc / Es
Es
r r. eff = A s /A c.eff = 0.0472
b = 300 mm
x = 240 mm
3 2.5*(h-d)
393
Creep coefficient for Girder
fck = 30 Mpa
fcm = 40 Mpa
t (70years) = 25550 days
to = 365 days
Ac = cross-sectional area in mm2 = 1155000 mm2 Outer Girder - Mid Span
u = perimeter in contact with atmosphere in mm = 8295 mm Outer Girder - Mid Span
ho = notional size = 2Ac/u = 278 mm
RH = 50.00 %
Φ(t,to) = fo bc (t,to)
Φo = fRH b(fcm) b(to)
ΦRH = 1 - RH/100
1 + for fcm ≤ 45Mpa
0.1 (ho) (1/3)
1 - RH/100
[1 + a1 ] x a2 for fcm > 45Mpa
0.1 (ho) (1/3)
0.7
α1 = [ 43.75 / fcm ] = 1.06474
0.2
α2 = [ 43.75 / fcm ] = 1.01808
ΦRH = 1.77
β (to) = 0.30
β (fcm) = 2.97
Φo = 1.56
β (t, to) = (t-to)/(bH + (t-to))
βH = Min 1.5 [1+(0.012 RH)18]ho+250

for fcm ≤ 45Mpa
1500
1.5 [1+(0.012 RH)18]ho+250 a3

for fcm > 45Mpa
Min 1500 a3
α3 = 1.046
βH = 667.76
β (t, to) = 0.99
Φ (t,to) = 1.55
394
12.0 CHECK FOR DEFLECTION:
Deflection checking during SLS condition under Frequent Load combination
(As per Cl:12.4 of IRC:112-2011)
As per Cl:12.4.2 of IRC 112-2011: cracking moment considered as
i) 70% of uncracked moment of inertia in DL & SIDL analysis
ii) 100% of uncracked moment of inertia in LL analysis
Overall span = 19000 mm

Creep coefficient = 1.55
Ec,eff = Ecm
1+ f
Ec,eff = 12153 N/mm2
Allowable deflection as per 12.4.1 (2) of IRC 112-2011
For vehicular = Span / 800
Allowable deflection = 23.75 mm
Input from grillage analysis,for L/2 location

Sl.no Description Node Load case Deflection Factor Final defl. Remark
Deflection due
1 58 90 4.933 2.55 18
Live Load
(SV Load) Total deflection = 18 Hence OK
395
Input File
STAAD FLOOR
START JOB INFORMATION
ENGINEER DATE 22-Jul-06
END JOB INFORMATION
INPUT WIDTH 79
***********************************************
* STAAD.Pro Generated Comment *
***********************************************
*1 0 0 0 5 1 0 0
*6 1.6 0 0 7 2.2 0 0
*8 3.61 0 0 17 16.3 0 0
*18 16.9 0 0 19 17.5 0 0
*20 17.75 0 0 23 18.5 0 0
*R A 1 0.000 0 1.2
*R 2 0.000 0 3
*R 1 0.000 0 1.2
***********************************************
UNIT METER MTON
JOINT COORDINATES
1 0 0 0; 2 0.25 0 0; 3 0.5 0 0; 4 0.75 0 0; 5 1 0 0; 6 1.6 0 0; 7 2.2 0 0;
8 3.61 0 0; 9 5.02 0 0; 10 6.43 0 0; 11 7.84 0 0; 12 9.25 0 0; 13 10.66 0 0;
14 12.07 0 0; 15 13.48 0 0; 16 14.89 0 0; 17 16.3 0 0; 18 16.9 0 0;
19 17.5 0 0; 20 17.75 0 0; 21 18 0 0; 22 18.25 0 0; 23 18.5 0 0; 24 0 0 1.2;
25 0.25 0 1.2; 26 0.5 0 1.2; 27 0.75 0 1.2; 28 1 0 1.2; 29 1.6 0 1.2;
30 2.2 0 1.2; 31 3.61 0 1.2; 32 5.02 0 1.2; 33 6.43 0 1.2; 34 7.84 0 1.2;
35 9.25 0 1.2; 36 10.66 0 1.2; 37 12.07 0 1.2; 38 13.48 0 1.2; 39 14.89 0 1.2;
40 16.3 0 1.2; 41 16.9 0 1.2; 42 17.5 0 1.2; 43 17.75 0 1.2; 44 18 0 1.2;
45 18.25 0 1.2; 46 18.5 0 1.2; 47 0 0 4.2; 48 0.25 0 4.2; 49 0.5 0 4.2;
50 0.75 0 4.2; 51 1 0 4.2; 52 1.6 0 4.2; 53 2.2 0 4.2; 54 3.61 0 4.2;
55 5.02 0 4.2; 56 6.43 0 4.2; 57 7.84 0 4.2; 58 9.25 0 4.2; 59 10.66 0 4.2;
60 12.07 0 4.2; 61 13.48 0 4.2; 62 14.89 0 4.2; 63 16.3 0 4.2; 64 16.9 0 4.2;
65 17.5 0 4.2; 66 17.75 0 4.2; 67 18 0 4.2; 68 18.25 0 4.2; 69 18.5 0 4.2;
70 0 0 7.2; 71 0.25 0 7.2; 72 0.5 0 7.2; 73 0.75 0 7.2; 74 1 0 7.2;
75 1.6 0 7.2; 76 2.2 0 7.2; 77 3.61 0 7.2; 78 5.02 0 7.2; 79 6.43 0 7.2;
80 7.84 0 7.2; 81 9.25 0 7.2; 82 10.66 0 7.2; 83 12.07 0 7.2; 84 13.48 0 7.2;
85 14.89 0 7.2; 86 16.3 0 7.2; 87 16.9 0 7.2; 88 17.5 0 7.2; 89 17.75 0 7.2;
90 18 0 7.2; 91 18.25 0 7.2; 92 18.5 0 7.2; 93 0 0 8.4; 94 0.25 0 8.4;
95 0.5 0 8.4; 96 0.75 0 8.4; 97 1 0 8.4; 98 1.6 0 8.4; 99 2.2 0 8.4;
100 3.61 0 8.4; 101 5.02 0 8.4; 102 6.43 0 8.4; 103 7.84 0 8.4; 104 9.25 0 8.4;
105 10.66 0 8.4; 106 12.07 0 8.4; 107 13.48 0 8.4; 108 14.89 0 8.4;
109 16.3 0 8.4; 110 16.9 0 8.4; 111 17.5 0 8.4; 112 17.75 0 8.4; 113 18 0 8.4;
114 18.25 0 8.4; 115 18.5 0 8.4; 116 0 0 2.7; 117 0 0 5.7; 118 18.5 0 2.7;
119 18.5 0 5.7;
***********************************************
* STAAD.Pro Generated Comment *
***********************************************
*1 1 2 22
*R A 4 22 23
*111 1 24 133
*142 25 48 162
*163 48 71 183
*184 70 93 206
************************************************
396
MEMBER INCIDENCES
1 1 2; 2 2 3; 3 3 4; 4 4 5; 5 5 6; 6 6 7; 7 7 8; 8 8 9; 9 9 10; 10 10 11;
11 11 12; 12 12 13; 13 13 14; 14 14 15; 15 15 16; 16 16 17; 17 17 18; 18 18 19;
19 19 20; 20 20 21; 21 21 22; 22 22 23; 23 24 25; 24 25 26; 25 26 27; 26 27 28;
27 28 29; 28 29 30; 29 30 31; 30 31 32; 31 32 33; 32 33 34; 33 34 35; 34 35 36;
35 36 37; 36 37 38; 37 38 39; 38 39 40; 39 40 41; 40 41 42; 41 42 43; 42 43 44;
43 44 45; 44 45 46; 45 47 48; 46 48 49; 47 49 50; 48 50 51; 49 51 52; 50 52 53;
51 53 54; 52 54 55; 53 55 56; 54 56 57; 55 57 58; 56 58 59; 57 59 60; 58 60 61;
59 61 62; 60 62 63; 61 63 64; 62 64 65; 63 65 66; 64 66 67; 65 67 68; 66 68 69;
67 70 71; 68 71 72; 69 72 73; 70 73 74; 71 74 75; 72 75 76; 73 76 77; 74 77 78;
75 78 79; 76 79 80; 77 80 81; 78 81 82; 79 82 83; 80 83 84; 81 84 85; 82 85 86;
83 86 87; 84 87 88; 85 88 89; 86 89 90; 87 90 91; 88 91 92; 89 93 94; 90 94 95;
91 95 96; 92 96 97; 93 97 98; 94 98 99; 95 99 100; 96 100 101; 97 101 102;
98 102 103; 99 103 104; 100 104 105; 101 105 106; 102 106 107; 103 107 108;
104 108 109; 105 109 110; 106 110 111; 107 111 112; 108 112 113; 109 113 114;
110 114 115; 111 1 24; 112 2 25; 113 3 26; 114 4 27; 115 5 28; 116 6 29;
117 7 30; 118 8 31; 119 9 32; 120 10 33; 121 11 34; 122 12 35; 123 13 36;
124 14 37; 125 15 38; 126 16 39; 127 17 40; 128 18 41; 129 19 42; 130 20 43;
131 21 44; 132 22 45; 133 23 46; 134 24 116; 135 116 47; 136 47 117;
137 117 70; 138 46 118; 139 118 69; 140 69 119; 141 119 92; 142 25 48;
143 26 49; 144 27 50; 145 28 51; 146 29 52; 147 30 53; 148 31 54; 149 32 55;
150 33 56; 151 34 57; 152 35 58; 153 36 59; 154 37 60; 155 38 61; 156 39 62;
157 40 63; 158 41 64; 159 42 65; 160 43 66; 161 44 67; 162 45 68; 163 48 71;
164 49 72; 165 50 73; 166 51 74; 167 52 75; 168 53 76; 169 54 77; 170 55 78;
171 56 79; 172 57 80; 173 58 81; 174 59 82; 175 60 83; 176 61 84; 177 62 85;
178 63 86; 179 64 87; 180 65 88; 181 66 89; 182 67 90; 183 68 91; 184 70 93;
185 71 94; 186 72 95; 187 73 96; 188 74 97; 189 75 98; 190 76 99; 191 77 100;
192 78 101; 193 79 102; 194 80 103; 195 81 104; 196 82 105; 197 83 106;
198 84 107; 199 85 108; 200 86 109; 201 87 110; 202 88 111; 203 89 112;
204 90 113; 205 91 114; 206 92 115;
MEMBER PROPERTY AMERICAN
******outer support
23 TO 26 41 TO 44 PRIS AX 1.4288 IX 0.085 IY 0.379 IZ 0.342
****outer varying
27 28 39 40 PRIS AX 1.2919 IX 0.051 IY 0.371 IZ 0.323
71 72 83 84 PRIS AX 1.2919 IX 0.051 IY 0.371 IZ 0.323
********outer mid******
******inner support****
******inner varying
49 50 61 62 PRIS AX 1.3594 IX 0.052 IY 0.497 IZ 0.3346
******inner mid***********
51 TO 60 PRIS AX 1.2225 IX 0.018 IY 0.490 IZ 0.3141
********end cross girder******
134 TO 137 PRIS AX 0.647 IX 0.025 IY 0.024 IZ 0.103
138 TO 141 PRIS AX 0.647 IX 0.025 IY 0.024 IZ 0.103
***********nul********
1 TO 22 89 TO 110 PRIS YD 0.01 ZD 0.01
397
********slab properties*******
111 133 184 206 PRIS AX 0.02813 IX 7e-005 IY 4e-005 IZ 0.00012
115 129 PRIS AX 0.09563 IX 0.00081 IY 0.00144 IZ 0.0004
166 180 PRIS AX 0.09563 IX 0.00081 IY 0.00144 IZ 0.0004
145 159 PRIS AX 0.09563 IX 0.00081 IY 0.00144 IZ 0.0004
188 202 PRIS AX 0.09563 IX 0.00081 IY 0.00144 IZ 0.0004
116 117 127 128 PRIS AX 0.22613 IX 0.00191 IY 0.01903 IZ 0.00095
167 168 178 179 PRIS AX 0.22613 IX 0.00191 IY 0.01903 IZ 0.00095
146 147 157 158 PRIS AX 0.22613 IX 0.00191 IY 0.01903 IZ 0.00095
189 190 200 201 PRIS AX 0.22613 IX 0.00191 IY 0.01903 IZ 0.00095
118 TO 126 PRIS AX 0.31725 IX 0.00268 IY 0.05256 IZ 0.00134
169 TO 177 PRIS AX 0.31725 IX 0.00268 IY 0.05256 IZ 0.00134
148 TO 156 PRIS AX 0.31725 IX 0.00268 IY 0.05256 IZ 0.00134
191 TO 199 PRIS AX 0.31725 IX 0.00268 IY 0.05256 IZ 0.00134
************************
SUPPORTS
24 PINNED
47 70 FIXED BUT FZ MX MY MZ
46 FIXED BUT FX MX MY MZ
69 92 FIXED BUT FX FZ MX MY MZ
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC MATERIAL1
E 3.05e+006
POISSON 0.17
END DEFINE MATERIAL
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL MATERIAL1 ALL
*********************************
DEFINE MOVING LOAD
TYPE 1 LOAD 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4 5.7 5.7 1.35 1.35
DIST 3 3 3 4.3 1.2 3.2 1.1 WID 1.8
TYPE 2 LOAD 1.35 1.35 5.7 5.7 3.4 3.4 3.4 3.4
DIST 1.1 3.2 1.2 4.3 3 3 3 WID 1.8
TYPE 3 LOAD 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5 6 6 4
DIST 1.37 3.05 1.37 2.13 1.52 3.96 WID 1.93
TYPE 4 LOAD 4 6 6 8.5 8.5 8.5 8.5
DIST 3.96 1.52 2.13 1.37 3.05 1.37 WID 1.93
TYPE 5 LOAD 3.5 7 7 7 7 3.5
DIST 0.914 0.914 0.914 0.914 0.914 WID 2.06
*************************************
398
LOAD 1 WEIGHT OF SLAB AND BEAMS
MEMBER LOAD
* GIRDER LOADS
23 TO 26 41 TO 44 UNI GY -1.907
67 TO 70 85 TO 88 UNI GY -1.907
27 28 39 40 UNI GY -1.576
71 72 83 84 UNI GY -1.576
29 TO 38 73 TO 82 UNI GY -1.244
* INTERNAL GIRDERS
45 TO 48 63 TO 66 UNI GY -1.907
49 50 61 62 UNI GY -1.576
51 TO 60 UNI GY -1.244
* DIAPHRAGM LOADS
134 TO 137 UNI GY -1.027
138 TO 141 UNI GY -1.027
LOAD 2 SLAB LOADS
MEMBER LOAD
* SLAB LOADS
134 TO 137 UNI GY -0.338
138 TO 141 UNI GY -0.338
111 133 184 206 UNI GY -0.068
112 TO 114 130 TO 132 UNI GY -0.135
163 TO 165 181 TO 183 UNI GY -0.135
142 TO 144 160 TO 162 UNI GY -0.135
185 TO 187 203 TO 205 UNI GY -0.135
115 129 UNI GY -0.23
166 180 UNI GY -0.23
145 159 UNI GY -0.23
188 202 UNI GY -0.23
116 128 UNI GY -0.324
167 179 UNI GY -0.324
146 158 UNI GY -0.324
189 201 UNI GY -0.324
117 127 UNI GY -0.543
168 178 UNI GY -0.543
147 157 UNI GY -0.543
190 200 UNI GY -0.543
118 TO 126 UNI GY -0.761
169 TO 177 UNI GY -0.761
148 TO 156 UNI GY -0.761
191 TO 199 UNI GY -0.761
LOAD 3 WEIGHT OF CRASH BARRIER AND HANDRAIL
MEMBER LOAD
111 133 CON GY -0.084 0.225
184 206 CON GY -0.084 0.975
112 TO 114 CON GY -0.168 0.225
185 TO 187 CON GY -0.168 0.975
130 TO 132 CON GY -0.168 0.225
203 TO 205 CON GY -0.168 0.975
115 129 CON GY -0.285 0.225
188 202 CON GY -0.285 0.975
116 CON GY -0.402 0.225
117 CON GY -0.673 0.225
189 CON GY -0.402 0.975
190 CON GY -0.673 0.975
128 CON GY -0.402 0.225
127 CON GY -0.673 0.225
200 CON GY -0.673 0.975
201 CON GY -0.402 0.975
118 TO 126 CON GY -0.945 0.225
191 TO 199 CON GY -0.945 0.975
399
** Load for hand rail
*111 133 CON GY -0 0
*184 206 CON GY -0 0
*112 TO 114 CON GY -0 0
*185 TO 187 CON GY -0 0
*130 TO 132 CON GY -0 0
*203 TO 205 CON GY -0 0
*115 129 CON GY -0 0
*188 202 CON GY -0 0
*116 CON GY -0 0
*117 CON GY -0 0
*189 190 CON GY -0 0
*128 CON GY -0 0
*127 CON GY -0 0
*200 201 CON GY -0 0
*118 TO 126 CON GY -0 0
*191 TO 199 CON GY -0 0
LOAD 4 WEARING COAT LOADS AND FOOTPATH DL
MEMBER LOAD
* WEARING COAT ON ALL MEMBERS
134 TO 137 UNI GY -0.089
138 TO 141 UNI GY -0.089
115 129 UNI GY -0.061 0.45 1.2
166 180 UNI GY -0.061 0 3
145 159 UNI GY -0.061 0 3
188 202 UNI GY -0.061 0 0.75
116 UNI GY -0.144 0.45 1.2
117 UNI GY -0.144 0.45 1.2
167 179 UNI GY -0.086 0 3
168 178 UNI GY -0.144 0 3
146 158 UNI GY -0.086 0 3
189 UNI GY -0.086 0 0.75
190 UNI GY -0.144 0 0.75
127 UNI GY -0.144 0.45 1.2
128 UNI GY -0.144 0.45 1.2
147 157 UNI GY -0.144 0 3
200 UNI GY -0.144 0 0.75
201 UNI GY -0.086 0 0.75
118 TO 126 UNI GY -0.202 0.45 1.2
169 TO 177 UNI GY -0.202 0 3
148 TO 156 UNI GY -0.202 0 3
191 TO 199 UNI GY -0.202 0 0.75
***************************************
*LOAD COMBINATION 100
*1 1.0 2 1.0
*************************************
*LOAD GENERATION 300
*TYPE 3 -13.4 0 4.01 XINC 0.2
***************** 1 L CLASS A *********
******************** 0.45+0.15+0.5/2+1.8 = 2.65
*TYPE 1 -18.80 0 2.65 XINC 0.2
******INNER GIRDER
*TYPE 3 -13.4 0 4.2 XINC 0.2
PERFORM ANALYSIS
FINISH
400
13.0 CURTAILMENT DETAILS OF REINFORCEMENT:
Curtailment of reinforcement shall be done as per fig 16.2 of IRC 112:2011
Summary of shear for find the shift of the tensile force diagram
Web
Compon 1/8th 1/4th 3/8th
Load Case Support widenin Mid span
ents span span span
g end
BM in
843.6 1680.6 2240.7 3249.2 3802.4 4049.6
Design Forces Knm
SF in Kn 1010.3 820.4 687.3 572.5 484.3 198.5
Table shown the tensile forces at various sections

Fs + Ftd Area of Tensile Area of
Bending Fs Tensile
Lever arm Shifted steel force steel
Distance moment forces No of bars Remark
(mm) tensile required capacity Provided
(KNm) (KN)
force (KN) (mm2) (KN) (mm )2
Support 843.58 1187 711 1721 3956 3203 7363 15 OK

Web widening
end 1680.63 1430 1176 1996 4588 4198 9651 12 OK
1/8th span 2240.74 1412 1587 2274 5228 3203 7363 15 OK
1/4th span 3249.23 1412 2301 2873 6605 3203 7363 15 OK
3/8th span 3802.35 1373 2769 3253 7479 4271 9817 20 OK
Mid span 4049.62 1373 2949 3147 7236 4271 9817 20 OK
401
End Cross Girder (at abutment )
402
End Cross Girder
width of beam = 0.4 m

Overall depth = 1.325 m Jackup condition
BM diagram
SF Diagram
Summary of ULS Bending Moment and shear force

Top Bottom
Bending Moment at support section from staad 41.84 T-m 20.32
Design Bending moment = 62.76 T-m 30.48 T-m
Shear force at support section = 60.64 T 60.64

Design shear force at support = 90.96 T 90.96 T
SLS Bending moment and shear force

Top Bottom
Design Bending moment = 41.84 T 20.32 T
Design for Mement
Properties of Reinforcement and Concrete
Permissible Stresses: (As per IRC 112-2011)
Reinforcing steel FE 500 D

Yield strength,fyk = 500 Mpa
Patial Factor of material,γ s = 1.15 For Basic and Seismic combination
1.00 For Accidental combination
Design strength,fst=fyk/1.15 435 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity,Es = 200000 Mpa
403
Concrete M 30
Charactristic strength in concrete, fck = 30 Mpa
1.5 For Basic and Seismic combination
Assuming, acc 0.67

Design Strength of Concrete,fcd αcc fck/γs 13.40 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity, Ec or Ecm = 31000 Mpa
Centre to centre span = 3.00 m

Clear span = 2.20 m
Overall depth (D) = 1.325 m
Effective span (l) = 2.53 m
l/D 1.91 <2.5
Therefore it shall be designed as Deep beam
For the Rectangular- Parabolic stress block
Depth of Beam 1325 mm

Effective depth 1225 mm
width = 400 mm
fcd = 13.40 Mpa
Design of Sagging Moment
Assume Neutral axis 246.06 mm
Compression force= F c = fcd b x [1- 1/(n+1) ɛc2/ɛcu2 1067651 N

Tension Force F T = 0.87f y A st = 683296.4 N
Check Limit to ensure reinforcement is yeilding
1/((fyk/γsEsεcu2) + 1) 0.617 > 0.201

ok
εcu2 = 0.0035
γs = 1.15
x = 246.1 mm
Z = 1122.6 mm
Bottom reinforcement
As ≥ Mγs/fyk*z
624 mm2/m
Provide 3 nos 20 ø + 2 nos 20 ø + 2 nos 0ø
Ast = 1570.8 mm2/m
Minimum longitudinal reinforcement
Asmin = 0.26*fctm/fyk*bd But not less than 0.0013 bd

fctm = 0.259*(fck)^(2/3) As per Annexure of IRC 112:2011
2.501 Mpa
Asmin = 689 mm2/m or, 689 mm2/m
1570.8 mm2/m ok
404
Design of Hogging Moment

Tension Force F T = 0.87f y A st = 1067651 N
1/((fyk/γsEsεcu2) + 1) 0.617 > 0.205

ok
εcu2 = 0.0035
γs = 1.15
x = 98.9 mm
Z = 1183.9 mm
Top reinforcement
As ≥ Mγs/fyk*z
1219 mm2/m
Required 25 ø 2.48 nos
Ast = 2454.4 mm2/m ok
Side Face Reinforcement [As per clause 32.4 IS-456, 2000]
0.1 % of web area on either face with spacing not more then 450 mm.
Required Ast = 0.001*1325*400 530 mm2
Provide 6 nos 12 ø 678.6 mm2
405
Check for Shear strength:-
Design verification for shear is carried out at ultimate limit state
As per clause 10.3.2 of IRC: 112:2011

For element not requiring shear reinforcement , VRd.c ≥ VΕd
VRd.c = The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement.
VΕd = The design shear force at a cross-section resulting from external loading
Vрd = Shear component in prestressing tendon.
VRdc = [0.12 K(80ρ₁.fck)^0.33 +0.15σcр] bw.d
Subject to minimum of VRd.c = (Vmin + 0.15σcр) bw.d
K= 1 + √200/d ≤ 2 where depth in mm

Vmin = 0.031 K³⁄ ² fck½
σcр = Concrete compressive stress at the centroidal axis due to axial loading or prestressing.
σcр = NEd/Ac ≤ 0.2 fcd (Mpa)
Ac = Area of concrete cross section
fcd = Design value of concrete compression strength = α cc fck/γm
where, αcc = 0.67
ρ₁ = Asl /bw.d ≤ 0.02
Asl = Tensile reinforcement which extends by length greater than l bd +d beyond the
section considered
NEd = Applied longitudinal force the section due to loading or prestressing with proper
load factors(compressive force shall be taken as positive). The influence of
imposed deformation on NEd may be ignored.
bw = Minimum breadth of the section over the depth.
VΕd = The shear force VEd , calculated without reduction by β, should however always satisfy the condition
VΕd ≤ 0.5 bw d vfcd
v= Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear
v= 0.6 [1 - fck/310] fck in Mpa
Calculation of above values as per notation
Effective Depth, d 1225 mm

Width bw = 400 mm 1225
Coefficient = K= 1.40 < 2 1325
ok
Gross area of the section = Ac = 530000 mm2
Vmin = 0.28 Mpa
σcр (For seismic and basic) 0.00 Mpa
(For Accidental) 0.00 Mpa
Partial factor for For Basic and Seismic combination
1.5
For Accidental combination 1.2
fcd 13.40 Mpa
fcd 16.75 Mpa
0.2fcd 2.68 Mpa > 0.0 Mpa
3.35 Mpa > 3.5 Mpa
Asl = 2454
ρ₁ = 0.0050 < 0.02 ok
checking criteria 0.5 bw d vfcd 177.92 T ok
where strength reduction factor = 0.542 0.6*(1-30/310)
VΕd = factored design shear force 90.96 T
VRd,c = 18.76 T
VRd,c = 18.76 T
Vmin = 13.84 T
Hence, VRd,c 18.76 T
shear r/f required
406
Calculation of Vertical Shear Reinforcement
For members with vertical Shear Reinforcement, Shear resistance, V Rd is the smaller value of:
VRd·s = Asw * z* fywd * cot θ / s = 1552358 N 155.24 ton
VRd·max (maximum allowable SF in member) = = 1312855 N 131.29 ton

αcw * bw * z* v1 * fcd /(cotθ +tanθ )
VED = 909600 N < VRd·s OK
Maximum effective cross sectional area of the shear reinforcement, Asw.max

cotθ = 2.5
Applied shear stress 1.91
sin2θ = 3.66
0.135 fck (1 - fck/310)
2θ = 31.42
θ= 15.71 <21.8
Hence cotθ = 2.5
Minimum allowable stress in strut = 2.50 mpa

Applied shear stress 1.91 mpa
fywd = 0.8fwyk 348 Mpa fwyk = fyk/ϒs

v1 = 0.6
Z= 1.184 m
σcр 0.00
% of fcd 0.00
αcw 1+σcр /fcd 1
bw 400
Assuming
Asw reqd = 131.57 mm2
Dia.of bar 12 mm @ 150 c/c 2L

Area of Stirrups Asw 226 mm2
ok
Stirrup Per mt = 1508 mm2/m
Shear Reinforcement Ratio
pw = Asw/b.s.sinα
0.025
Minimum Shear Reinforcement (for beam)
Minimum shear Reinforcement ratio(ρmin) 0.072(fck)^0.5/fyk 0.0008 ok
Limit State of Cracking
Check for stresses at support:
Calculation of C.G. of cracked transformed section from top (dc)
dc= (-AsEs+sqrt((AsEs)^2+2.b.As .Es. Eceff.d))/(bEceff)

297 mm
Es = 200000 Mpa
Ec = 32000 Mpa
As = 2454 mm2
d= 1225 mm
Ø= 1.5 Checked for transition situation,Quasi-permanent load case prevaing

Ecff = 12800.00 Mpa
The second moment of area of the cracked section,in steel units
I = As.(d-dc)^2+1/3*Eceff/Es*bdc^3
2.34E+09
Now the service moment MED = 41.84 T-m
So concrete stress sc = MED/ZC*Eceff/Es 3.41 Mpa 41.84*10^7*297.3/2,33,65,86,342.37*12800/200000

Steel stress = 166.12 Mpa 41.84*10^7*(1225-297.3)/2,33,65,86,342
407
Crack width calculation at mid span
Spacing Criteria = 5(c+Ø/2) 312.5 ø mm

σsc = 166.12 Mpa
αe = 15.63
hceff = 250 mm
Aceff = 100000 mm2
As = 2454 mm2
ρρeff = 0.0245
kt = 0.5 (0.6 for short term loading and 0.4 for long term loading,taking average)
c = 50 mm
Ø = 32 mm
k1 = 0.8 for high bond bars
k2 = 0.5 for bending
Sr,max = 391.65 mm
fct,eff = 2.8 Mpa
Єsm - Єcm = 0.0004
0.6*σsc/Es = 0.0005
Wk 0.17 < 0.3 ok
Allowable crack width As per IRC 112:2011
408
Intermediate Cross Girder
409
End Cross Girder

Overall depth = 1.325 m
+ bottom
Item BM (t-m) SF (t)
+ -
1.00 1.35 DL 2.21 0 2.97
1.00 1.35 SIDL(CB) 0 -18.13 5.677
1.00 1.75 SIDL(WC) 2.98 0 0.77
1.00 1.5 LL 24 -14.4 10
1.00 1.5 CLA 19.36 -15.2 7
1.00 1 SV 0 0
Summary of ULS Bending Moment and shear force

Top Bottom
Bending Moment at support section from staad 44.20 T-m 47.28
Design Bending moment = 66.29775 T-m 70.9133 T-m
Shear force at support section = 28.02 T 28.02

SLS Bending moment and shear force

Top Bottom
Design Bending moment = 44.1985 T 47.2755 T
Design for Mement
Properties of Reinforcement and Concrete
Permissible Stresses: (As per IRC 112-2011)
Reinforcing steel FE 500 D

Yield strength,fyk = 500 Mpa
Patial Factor of material,γ s = 1.15 For Basic and Seismic combination
Design strength,fst=fyk/1.15 435 Mpa

Modulus of elasticity,Es = 200000 Mpa
410
Concrete M 30
1.5 For Basic and Seismic combination
Assuming, acc 0.67

Design Strength of Concrete,fcd αcc fck/γs 13.40 Mpa
Modulus of Elasticity, Ec or Ecm = 32000 Mpa
Centre to centre span = 3.00 m

Clear span = 2.20 m
Overall depth (D) = 1.325 m
Effective span (l) = 2.53 m
l/D 1.91 <2.5
Therefore it shall be designed as Deep beam
For the Rectangular- Parabolic stress block
Depth of Beam 1325 mm

Effective depth 1225 mm
width = 300 mm
fcd = 13.40 Mpa
Design of Sagging Moment

Tension Force F T = 0.87f y A st = 956615 N
1/((fyk/γsEsεcu2) + 1) 0.617 > 0.375

ok
εcu2 = 0.0035
γs = 1.15
x = 459.3 mm
Z = 1033.9 mm
Bottom reinforcement
As ≥ Mγs/fyk*z
1577 mm2/m
Provide 3 nos 20 ø + 2 nos 20 ø + 2 nos 20 ø
Ast = 2199.1 mm2/m
at bottom within a depth of (0.25D - 0.05L) 0.18125 m

Minimum embedment from bottom face with a development length of (0.8*40*dia of bar) 640 mm
Minimum longitudinal reinforcement
Asmin = 0.26*fctm/fyk*bd But not less than 0.0013 bd

fctm = 0.259*(fck)^(2/3) As per Annexure of IRC 112:2011
2.501 Mpa
Asmin = 517 mm2/m or, 516.75 mm2/m
2199.1 mm2/m ok
411
Design of Hogging Moment

Tension Force F T = 0.87f y A st = 819955.7 N
1/((fyk/γsEsεcu2) + 1) 0.617 > 0.272

ok
εcu2 = 0.0035
γs = 1.15
x = 141.4 mm
Z = 1166.2 mm
Top reinforcement
As ≥ Mγs/fyk*z
1308 mm2/m
Required 20 ø 4.16 nos
Ast = 1885.0 mm2/m ok
Side Face Reinforcement [As per clause 32.4 IS-456, 2000]
0.1 % of web area on either face with spacing not more then 450 mm.
Required Ast = 0.001*1325*300 397.5 mm2
Provide 6 nos 12 ø 678.6 mm2
412
Check for Shear strength:-
Design verification for shear is carried out at ultimate limit state
As per clause 10.3.2 of IRC: 112:2011

For element not requiring shear reinforcement , VRd.c ≥ VΕd
VRd.c = The design shear resistance of the member without shear reinforcement.
VΕd = The design shear force at a cross-section resulting from external loading
Vрd = Shear component in prestressing tendon.
VRdc = [0.12 K(80ρ₁.fck)^0.33 +0.15σcр] bw.d
Subject to minimum of VRd.c = (Vmin + 0.15σcр) bw.d
K= 1 + √200/d ≤ 2 where depth in mm

Vmin = 0.031 K³⁄ ² fck½
σcр = Concrete compressive stress at the centroidal axis due to axial loading or prestressing.
σcр = NEd/Ac ≤ 0.2 fcd (Mpa)
Ac = Area of concrete cross section
fcd = Design value of concrete compression strength = α cc fck/γm
where, αcc = 0.67
ρ₁ = Asl /bw.d ≤ 0.02
Asl = Tensile reinforcement which extends by length greater than l bd +d beyond the
section considered
NEd = Applied longitudinal force the section due to loading or prestressing with proper
load factors(compressive force shall be taken as positive). The influence of
imposed deformation on NEd may be ignored.
bw = Minimum breadth of the section over the depth.
VΕd = The shear force VEd , calculated without reduction by β, should however always satisfy the condition
VΕd ≤ 0.5 bw d vfcd
v= Strength reduction factor for concrete cracked in shear
v= 0.6 [1 - fck/310] fck in Mpa
Effective Depth, d 1225 mm

Width bw = 300 mm 1225
Coefficient = K= 1.40 < 2 1325
ok
Gross area of the section = Ac = 397500 mm2
Vmin = 0.28 Mpa
σcр (For seismic and basic) 0.00 Mpa
(For Accidental) 0.00 Mpa
Partial factor for For Basic and Seismic combination
1.5
For Accidental combination 1.2
fcd 13.40 Mpa
fcd 16.75 Mpa
0.2fcd 2.68 Mpa > 0.0 Mpa
3.35 Mpa > 3.5 Mpa
Asl = 1094
ρ₁ = 0.0030 < 0.02 ok
checking criteria 0.5 bw d vfcd 133.44 T ok
where strength reduction factor = 0.542 0.6*(1-30/310)
VΕd = factored design shear force 42.03 T
VRd,c = 11.85 T
VRd,c = 11.85 T
Vmin = 10.38 T
Hence, VRd,c 11.85 T
shear r/f required
413
Calculation of Vertical Shear Reinforcement
For members with vertical Shear Reinforcement, Shear resistance, V Rd is the smaller value of:
VRd·s = Asw * z* fywd * cot θ / s = 1835000 N 183.50 ton
VRd·max (maximum allowable SF in member) = = 969931 N 96.99 ton

αcw * bw * z* v1 * fcd /(cotθ +tanθ )
VED = 420314 N < VRd·s OK
Maximum effective cross sectional area of the shear reinforcement, Asw.max

cotθ = 2.5
Applied shear stress 1.17
sin2θ = 3.66
0.135 fck (1 - fck/310)
2θ = 18.73
θ= 9.37 <21.8
Hence cotθ = 2.5
Minimum allowable stress in strut = 2.50 mpa

Applied shear stress 1.17 mpa
fywd = 0.8fwyk 348 Mpa fwyk = fyk/ϒs

v1 = 0.6
Z= 1.166 m
σcр 0.00
% of fcd 0.00
αcw 1+σcр /fcd 1
bw 300
Assuming
Asw reqd = 50.66 mm2
Dia.of bar 12 mm @ 125 c/c 2L

Area of Stirrups Asw 226 mm2
ok
Stirrup Per mt = 1810 mm2/m
Shear Reinforcement Ratio
pw = Asw/b.s.sinα
0.048
Minimum Shear Reinforcement (for beam)
Minimum shear Reinforcement ratio(ρmin) 0.072(fck)^0.5/fyk 0.0008 ok
Limit State of Cracking
Check for stresses at support:
Calculation of C.G. of cracked transformed section from top (dc)
dc= (-AsEs+sqrt((AsEs)^2+2.b.As .Es. Eceff.d))/(bEceff)

346 mm
Es = 200000 Mpa
Ec = 32000 Mpa
As = 1885 mm2
d= 1225 mm
Ø= 1.5 Checked for transition situation,Quasi-permanent load case prevaing

Ecff = 12800.00 Mpa
The second moment of area of the cracked section,in steel units
I = As.(d-dc)^2+1/3*Eceff/Es*bdc^3
1.72E+09
Now the service moment MED = 44.1985 T-m
So concrete stress sc = MED/ZC*Eceff/Es 5.69 Mpa 44.1985*10^7*346.0/1,72,14,82,782.37*12800/200000

Steel stress = 225.68 Mpa 44.1985*10^7*(1225-346.0)/1,72,14,82,782
414
Crack width calculation at mid span
Spacing Criteria = 5(c+Ø/2) 300 ø mm

σsc = 225.68 Mpa
αe = 15.63
hceff = 250 mm
Aceff = 75000 mm2
As = 1885 mm2
ρρeff = 0.0251
kt = 0.5 (0.6 for short term loading and 0.4 for long term loading,taking average)
c = 50 mm
Ø = 25 mm
k1 = 0.8 for high bond bars
k2 = 0.5 for bending
Sr,max = 339.10 mm
fct,eff = 2.8 Mpa
Єsm - Єcm = 0.0007
0.6*σsc/Es = 0.0007
Wk 0.25 < 0.3 ok
Allowable crack width As per IRC 112:2011
415
BEARING DESIGN
416
Over all span (center to center of Exp joint) 20.00 m
Effective span (center to center brg) 18.50 m
No. of bearings for one span 6 nos.
Seismic Zone IV
Zone factor 'Z' 0.24
Sa/g 2.50
R (Trans) 1.00
R (Long) 3.00
I 1.20
Hor seismic coefficient trans (0.24/2)*2.5*1.2/1 0.360 refer seismic coe. Calculation
Hor seismic coefficient long 0.120
Vertical Seismic Coeff. 0.36*2/3 0.24
1.1 Load Data
1.1.1 Loads
Braking Force (1000*0.2+554*0.05)*1.5 341.6 kN
VMAX HL HT
Dead Load 318 KN
SIDL (wc+c/b) 106 KN
Live Load 481 KN
Fh/2+Vr*Ltc 37.37 KN
Seismic vert -102 KN
Seismic Long 51 KN
Seismic trans 187 KN
LOAD FACTORS
NORMAL 1 SEISMIC L SEISMIC T
DL 1.35 1.35 1.35
SIDL (avg of
1.55 1.55 1.55
1.35 + 1.75)
LL 1.5 0.2 0.2

Braking 1.5 0.2 0.2
SEISMIC V 0 0.45 0.45
SEISMIC L 0 1.5 0.45
SEISMIC T 0 0.45 1.5
FACTORED LOADS
V HL HT
COMB1 1315.15535 56.0536875 0
COMB2 644.06281 83.794725 84.27321
COMB3 644.06281 30.370095 280.9107
1.1.2 Translation
For values moment/force tabulated below refer design of superstructure sheet.
Loads Basic Accidental Seismic
Permanent Loads
DL 1.35 1 1
1.35
SIDL except Surfacing 1 1
SIDL - Surfacing1.75 1 1
Variable Loads
Leading Load 1.5 0.75 0
1.15
Accompanying Load 0.2 0.2
1.35
Construction Live Load 1 1
B.M Normal Seismic

DL 1582 1172
SIDL 364 235
LL 2903 387
M Perm 1946 1407
M LL 2903 387
417
shrinkage 1.91E-04 * 18.50 */2 = 0.002 m
Temp 32.50 * 18.50 */2 * 1.20E-05 = 0.004 m
total 0.005 m
5.370 mm
Adopted value as per cl 5.2.3 of IRC:83 PART II (2011) =MAX(0.00537*1000,10) 10.00mm
1.1.3 Rotation Permissible longitudinal movement =
E= 32000 mpa = 9.00E+08 mm4
R for permanent loads 400*1946*18.5/(32000/2*900000000)*0.001*1000000000 0.0010 rad
R for Live loads 400*2903*18.5/(32000*900000000)*0.001*1000000000 0.0007 rad.
Total Normal 0.0017 rad
Total Seismic =0.00100003+0.0007459*.2 0.0011 rad.
Adopted value of rotation as per cl 5.2.3 of IRC:83 PART II (2011)
Normal case =MAX(0.00174593,.003) 0.0030 rad.
Seismic case =MAX(0.00114921,.003) 0.0030 rad.
1.2 WIND LOAD

Basic wind speed as per figure 6 of IRC 6 2014 39 m/sec
However as per clause 209.3.7 bridge shall not be carrying any live load when wind speed at deck level is greater than 36m/sec. Hence the wind loads
have been worked out for wind speed of 36m/sec considering live load and 47m/sec considering no live loads.
WIND WITH LIVE LOAD
For Basic wind speed 33 m/sec
Height of the bridge 10.0 m
Vz 27.80 m/sec
Pz 463.7 N/sqm
Vz for basic wind speed of 39 m/sec 33.0 m/sec
Pz for 33 m/sec 653.4 N/sqm
A1 per m length 1.275+0.065+0.85 for left span 2.175 m
G 2.0
CD 2(1+c/20d) 2.29
c (spacing of girders) 3
d (depth of girder) 1.025 m
FT (from one span) Pz. A1. G. CD =653.39*2.175*2*2.29268292682927=
6516 N/rm
Reaction at Left/Right Support 6516*20/2 = 65160 N
= 65.2 kN
Long Force 25% of Trans F 16.3 kN
Vert. Load
where Pz 653.4 N/sqm
A3 13.75 m
G 2.0
CL 0.75
Vert Load Fv = Pz. A3. G. CL 13476.2 N/rm
13.5 kN/m
Reaction at Left/Right Support 134.8 kN
Wind on Live Load
A1 3-(0.85) 2.15 m
G 2.0
CD Refer cl 209.3.6 1.2
FT Pz. A1. G. CD =653.39*2.15*2*1.2 = 3371.49 N/rm
3.37 kN/m
FT 33.71 kN
FL 25% of Trans F 8.4 kN
Total Trans F 98.87 kN Force per brg 24.72 kN
Total Long F 24.72 kN Force per brg 6.18 kN
Wind loads per bearings are much lower compared to seismic force hence not critical.
418
1.3 DESIGN OF BEARING
Overall width of the bearing a 300 mm a' 290 mm
Overall length of the bearing b 400 mm b' 390 mm
Overall height of bearing h0 72 mm A1 113100 mm2
Thickness of internal layer ti 12 mm Ip 1360 mm
Total thickness of elastomer h/Te 48 mm
Thickness of steel laminates hs 6 mm
No of steel laminates n 4
Thickness of outer layer of elastomer he 6 mm
Side cover c 5 mm
Shear modulus G 1 N/sqmm
SHAPE FACTOR (S)

S = A1/Ip/te
S (for inner layer) = 113100/(1360*12) 6.93
1.3.1 NORMAL CASE

Design strain due to compressive load (εcd) (As per cl 5.2.3.2 of IRC-83 part-II)
εcd = 1.5*Fzd/(G*Ar*S)
Ar = A1*(1-Vxd/a'-Vyd/b')
Vxd (long displacement) 10.00mm
Vyd (*trans displacement ) 0
Ar =113100*(1-10/290-0/390) 109200 mm2
Fzd = vertical design load 1315.1554 Kn
εcd =1.5*1315.15535*10^3/(1*109200*6.93) 2.61
Shear strain (εqd) (As per cl 5.2.3.3 of IRC-83 part-II)

εqd = Vxyd/Tq
Vxyd 10.00mm
Tq 72 mm
εqd =10/72 0.14 <1
ok
Design strain due to angular rotation (εαd) (As per cl 5.2.3.4 of IRC-83 part-II)
εαd (a'2*αad + b'2*αbd)*t1/(2*Σ(t1^3))
αad 0.0030 rad.
αbd 0 rad.
εαd =(290^2*0.003+390^2*0)*12/(2*(4-1)*12^3) 0.292
Total strain =2.61+0.14+0.292 3.042 <7
ok
Reinforcing plate thickness ts (As per cl 5.2.3.5 of IRC-83 part-II)

ts Kp*Fzd*(t1+t2)*Kh*γm/(Ar*fy)
t1 12 mm
t2 12 mm
Kh 1
γm 1
Kp 1.3
fy 0.87*500 250 Mpa
ts =1.3*1315.15535*10^3*(12+12)*1*1/(109200*250) 1.503 mm
Provided thickness 6 mm
Limiting conditions (As per cl 5.2.3.6 of IRC-83 part-II)

Rotational limitation condition
ΣVzd - (a'*αad + b'*αbd)/(Krd) > 0
ΣVzd Σ(Fzd*t1/A1)*(1/(5*G*S1^2)+1/Eb)
Eb 2000 Mpa
ΣVzd =1315.15535*10^3*(4-1)*12/113100*(1/(5*1*6.93^2) + 1/2000) 1.953 mm
Krd 3
ΣVzd - (a'*αad + b'*αbd)/(Krd)
=1.953-(290*0.003+390*0)/3 1.663 >0
ok
419
Buckling stability
Fzd/Ar < 2*a'*G*S1/(3*Te)
Te 48 mm
Fzd/Ar =1315.15535*10^3/109200 12.044 Mpa
2*a'*G*S1/(3*Te) =*2*290*1*6.93/(3*48) 27.913 >12.044
ok
Non sliding condition
Fxyd ≤ μe*Fzdmin
Fxyd 56.1 Kn
μe 0.1 + 1.5*Kf/σm
Kf 0.6
Fzdmin 1315.1554 Kn
σm Fzdmin/A1 11.628 N/mm^2
μe =0.1 + 1.5*0.6/11.628 0.177
μe*Fzdmin =0.177*1315.15535 232.7825 >56.0536875
ok
Under permanent loads
σcdmin = Fzdmin/Ar ≥ 3
Fzdmin/Ar =1315.15535*10^3/109200 12.044 >3
ok
1.3.2 SEISMIC CASE
Design strain due to compressive load (εcd) (As per cl 5.2.3.2 of IRC-83 part-II)
εcd = 1.5*Fzd/(G*Ar*S)
Ar = A1*(1-Vxd/a'-Vyd/b')
Vxd (long displacement) 10.00mm
Vyd (*trans displacement ) 0
Ar =113100*(1-10/290-0/390) 109200 mm2
Fzd = vertical design load 644.06281 Kn
εcd =1.5*644.06281*10^3/(1*109200*6.93) 1.28
Shear strain (εqd) (As per cl 5.2.3.3 of IRC-83 part-II)

εqd = Vxyd/Tq
Vxyd 10.00mm
Tq 72 mm
εqd =10/72 0.14 <1
ok
Design strain due to angular rotation (εαd) (As per cl 5.2.3.4 of IRC-83 part-II)
εαd (a'2*αad + b'2*αbd)*t1/(2*Σ(t1^3))
αad 0.0030 rad
αbd 0 rad
εαd =(290^2*0.003+390^2*0)*12/(2*(4-1)*12^3) 0.292
(290^2*0.003 + 390^2*0)*12/(2*(4-1)*12^3
Total strain =1.28+0.14+0.292 1.712 <7
ok
Reinforcing plate thickness ts (As per cl 5.2.3.5 of IRC-83 part-II)

ts Kp*Fzd*(t1+t2)*Kh*γm/(Ar*fy)
t1 12 mm
t2 12 mm
Kh 1 with-out hole
γm 1
Kp 1.3
fy 0.87*500 250 Mpa structural steel
ts =1.3*644.06281*10^3*(12+12)*1*1/(109200*250) 0.736 mm
Provided thickness 6 mm
420
Limiting conditions (As per cl 5.2.3.6 of IRC-83 part-II)
Rotational limitation condition
ΣVzd - (a'*αad + b'*αbd)/(Krd) > 0
ΣVzd Σ(Fzd*t1/A1)*(1/(5*G*S1^2)+1/Eb)
Eb 2000 Mpa
ΣVzd =644.06281*10^3*(4-1)*12/113100*(1/(5*1*6.93^2) + 1/2000) 0.956 mm
Krd 3
ΣVzd - (a'*αad + b'*αbd)/(Krd)
=0.956-(290*0.003+390*0)/3 0.666 >0
ok
Buckling stability
Fzd/Ar < 2*a'*G*S1/(3*Te)
Te 48 mm
Fzd/Ar =644.06281*10^3/109200 5.898 Mpa
2*a'*G*S1/(3*Te) =*2*290*1*6.93/(3*48) 27.913 >5.898
ok
Non sliding condition
Fxyd ≤ μe*Fzdmin
Fxyd =MAX(SQRT(280.9107^2+30.370095^2),SQRT(84.27^2+83.79^2) 118.8 KN
μe 0.1 + 1.5*Kf/σm
Kf 0.6
Fzdmin 644.06281 Kn
σm Fzdmin/A1 =644.06281*10^3/113100 5.695 N/mm^2
μe =0.1 + 1.5*0.6/5.695 0.258
μe*Fzdmin =0.258*644.06281 166.168 >118.842
ok
Under permanent loads
σcdmin = Fzdmin/Ar ≥ 3
Fzdmin/Ar =644.06281*10^3/109200 5.898 >3
ok
421
DRAWINGS
422
GENERAL NOTES:-
A. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS (MM) AND LEVELS
ARE IN METERS (M),UNLESS OTHERWISE MENTIONED. ONLY
WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE FOLLOWED.
B.THIS DRAWING MAY BE RED IN CONJUNCTION WITH NOTES
OF DRG NO 2022-23/GAD/01 AND OTHER CONNECTED
DRAWING.
C.MATERIALS SPECIFICATIONS :-
1.CONCRETE :
A) GRADE OF CONCRETE USED :-
(I) SUPERSTRUCTURE = M30, (II) RETURN WALL = M30, (III)
ABUTMENT & PIER = M30, (IV) ABUTMENT & PIER CAP = M30,
(V) PILE CAP = M30 (VI) PILE = M35 (VII) DIRT WALL = M30,
(VIII) APPROACH SLAB = M30 IX) P.C.C. BELOW APPROACH
SLAB = M15, (X) R.C.C. KERB & RAILING = M30 (XI)
PEDESTAL = M30 (XII) REACTION BLOCK = M30
2) CONCRETE SHALL BE OF DESIGN MIX AND SHALL HAVE TO
P1 P2 P3 P4
A1 ACHIEVE 28 DAYS CHARACTERISTICS STRENGTH ON 150MM
CUBES FOR MODERATE CONDITION OF EXPOSURE.
3) 43 GRADE PORTLAND POZZOLANA CEMENT CONFORMING
TO IS : 1489/1991,PART 1 OR PORTLAND SLAG CEMENT
20000 20000 20000 20000 CONFORMING TO IS. 455 CAPABLE OF ACHIEVING THE
REQUIRED DESIGN CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL ONLY BE
18500 18500 18500 18500 USED.
4) TO IMPROVE WORKABILITY OF CONCRETE, ADMIXTURES
CONFORMING TO IS : 9103 MAY BE USED SUBJECT TO
. SATISFACTORY PROVEN USE.
5) MAXIMUM WATER CEMENT RATIO SHALL BE AS PER TABLE -
1500
14.2, IRC-112-2011.
ALL REINFORCING STEEL U(II) REINFORCEMENT : SHALL BE
OF HIGH YIELD STRENGTH DEFORMED BARS (GRADE
FINISHED ROAD LEVEL
DESIGNATION Fe 500D) CONFORMING TO IS : 1786 (EXCEPT
FOR MESH REINFORCEMENT WHICH SHALL BE MS BARS
300 GRADE DESIGNATION Fe 240 CONFORMING TO IS : 432 PART
(III) WATER:
1000 1000 1000 1000 BE USED IN CONCRETING AND CURING SHALL WATER TO
CONFORM TO TABLE -14.2, IRC - 112-2011.
1500
RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER D.WORKMANSHIP / DETAILING
1. MINIMUM CLEAR COVER FOR SLAB=25MM SUBSTRUCTURE
= 40MM FOUNDATION = 75mm.
2. FOR ENSURING PROPER COVER OF CONCRETE TO
650 3000 650 REINFORCEMENT SPECIALLY MADE POLYMER COVER BLOCKS
4300 SHALL ONLY BE USED.
3. BENDING OF REINFORCEMENT BARS SHALL BE AS PER IS :
2502.
4. LAP LENGTH & DEVELOPMENT LENGTH (LD)OF
REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
RELEVANT CLAUSE 15.2.5.1 &15.2.3.3 OF IRC :112-2011
FINISHED 5. PROPER COMPACTION OF CONCRETE SHALL BE ENSURED
LEVEL
BY USE OF FORM VIBRATOR OR NEEDLE VIBRATOR USE OF
(M)
FULL WIDTH SCREED VIBRATOR FOR COMPACTION OF
CONCRETE IN TOP SLAB BE ENSURED.
GROUND
6. SHUTTERING PLATES SHALL SUITABLY BE STIFFENED TO
LEVEL
(M)
ENABLE THE COMPACTION BY FORM VIBRATORS.
7. SHARP EDGES OF CONCRETE SHALL BE CHAMFERED.
8. THE WEEP HOLES SHALL BE WITH 100MM DIA AC PIPE IN
1:20 SLOPE @1M C/C STAGGERED HORIZONTALLY &
A1 P1 A2 VERTICALLY AT SIDE WALL &RETURN WALLS.
9. CONSTRUCTION JOINT SHOULD BE PROVIDED AT
FLOW D/S LOCATION OF ZERO MOMENT AS FAR AS PRACTICABLE &
SHOULD BE PRE-APPROVED BY ENGINEER IN
650 3000 650
CHARGE.CONCRETING NEAR CONSTRUCTION JOINT SHALL
650 650 3000 650 BE DONE AS SPECIFIED IN MORTH/MOST
650
3000 650
3000 650
10. THE SOIL BELOW FOUNDING LEVEL OF RETAINING WALL
3000
SHOULD BE WALL COMPACTION TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM
3500 BEARING CAPACITY OF 15 T/SQM.
11. STRIP SEAL TYPE EXPANSION JOINTS OF PROVEN QUALITY
10300
8400
3000
SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR FULL WIDTH.
12. BACK FILLING BEHIND ABUTMENTS SHALL BE
650 3000
650 3000
BRACKET OF SELECTED EARTH CONFORMING OF APPENDEX 6 OF I
3000
C =1.76-1.8T/CUM.
650
4300 13. 65MM THICK WEARING COAT COMPRISING OF UNDER
LAYER OF 6MM THICK WATER PROOFING LAYER OVER LAID
FLOW U/S 4300 WITH 50MM THICK ASPHALTIC CONCRETE.
DETAILS OF LEVELS
1. HFL 100.923M
2. FINISHED ROAD LEVEL 103.513M
3. L.W.L 98.467M
PROJECT: DISTRICT: WEST CHAMPARAN DRAWING TITLE: CONSULTANTS: R.W.D Works Division,
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 KM IN
DIVISION: BAGHA-1
C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society, South
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) PIPRA TO GARDI DRG No:2022-23/GAD/01 REVISION SCALE : NTS Extension,Part-1 New Delhi -110049 J.E. A.E. E.E.
BLOCK: RAMNAGAR DATE
423
P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P10
A2
20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000 20000

18500 18500 18500 18500 18500 18500 18500
(III) WATER:
C.WORKMANSHIP / DETAILING
1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000
RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER RECTANGULAR PIER
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC GENERAL ARRANGEMENT PLAN Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DIVISION: BAGHA-1
424
A NOTES :
A1 8400
7500 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS (MM) AND LEVELS
CL OF BEARING / ABUTMENT / CROSS GIRDER 450 450
CARRIAGEWAY ARE IN M. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
3500MM APPROACH
SLAB CRASH BARRIER
1100
CONSTRUCTION JOINT SECTION ST SUPPORT SECTION IN MID
20MM STRIP SEAL EXP.
JOINT
400MM THK DIRT
DRAINAGE SPOUT 65MM THK. CEMENT
WALL CONCRETE WEARING
225
COAT
50 175 50
1575
150MM THK PCC (M15)
HAUNCH (150X75)
150
1575
300
150
ELASTOMERIC BEARING ==
ARRESTER BLOCK 175
500
ABUTMENT CAP
SEISMIC (RB1)
R=250
INDEPENDENT RETAINING WALL 3000 3000
E
900
800
600MM THK. FILTER MEDIA
3670
R=50
250
1000 WEEP HOLES 100 DIA
WITH AC PIPE IN 1:20
PVC PIPE
SLOPE @1000 C/C
STAGGERED
VERTICALLY &
WEARING COAT
150
175
500 HORIZONTALLY
TOP OF 500
PILE CAP
50
DECK SLAB 450
1500
150MM THK PCC (M15)
BOTTOM OF
PILE CAP
CRASH BARRIER
(N.T.S.)
20000
1500
650 3000 650
4300
A
SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF ABUTMENT
20MM THK STRIP SEAL CL OF EXP. JOINT
650 3000 650 EXP. JOINT CL OF BEARING / ABUTMENT /
750 CROSS GIRDER
730
650
300
650 3000 3000 3000 650 400 350
10300
525
700
SECTION ON A-A
DEPTH OF
3000
GIRDER
300
300
1575
CL OF CARRIAGEWAY/BRIDGE
CL OF GIRDER CL OF GIRDER CL OF GIRDER 300

DIRT WALL
(RB1)
700 (RB2)
L OF BEARING
SEISMIC ARRESTER BLOCK
300
150
(RB2)
10300
3000
300
1670
ELASTOMETRIC BEARING
B3(TYP.)
800
PEDESTAL
800
C
B1
500
1200 3000 3000 1200
3000
8400 670 1000

BEARING 320X400 (TYP) ABUTMENT CAP DETAIL - E
850x850 PEDESTAL (TYP)
650
PLAN OF ABUTMENT CAP SHOWING

4300 ARRANGEMENT OF PEDESTAL & BEARING
PLAN OF ABUTMENT
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DIVISION: BAGHA-1 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING OF ABUTMENT
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 KM IN C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society, South
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) PIPRA TO GARDI DRG No:2022-23/GAD/03 SCALE : NTS Extension,Part-1 New Delhi -110049 J.E. A.E. E.E.
BLOCK: RAMNAGAR DATE REVISION
425
8400 NOTES :
7500 C
L OF EXP. JOINT / PIER 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS (MM) AND LEVELS
450 450 ARE IN M. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.
CARRIAGEWAY
CL OF BEARING / CROSS GIRDER
CRASH BARRIER SECTION AT SUPPORT SECTION IN MID SPAN
1100
1500
300
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
225
150
DRAINAGE SPOUT
450
1575
150
DEPTH OF
300 650 300
GIRDER
1575
1200 3000 3000 1200 RB3
600
700(TYP.)
900
650
300
8000
2550 3000 2550 PEDESTAL
600
650
PIER CAP
RECTANGULAR PIER
1000
TOP OF 2610
PILE CAP
DETAIL - F
1500
CL OF GIRDER CL OF CARRIAGEWAY/BRIDGE CL OF GIRDER

BOTTOM OF 1150 3000 3000 1150
PILE CAP
(FOND.
800
LEV.)
SECTIONAL ELEVATION OF PIER

RB1
B2 (TYP.)
650 3000 3000 650
575
2610
RB3
650
B2 (TYP.)
B1
4300
3000
500
B2(TYP.) ELASTOMERIC BEARING PEDESTAL (PTFE)
650
PLAN OF PIER CAP

7300 WITH SEISMIC ARRESTER BLOCK
PLAN OF PIER
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIVISION: BAGHA-1 GENERAL ARRANGEMENT DRAWING OF PIER C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society,
BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 KM IN South Extension,Part-1
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) PIPRA TO GARDI BLOCK: RAMNAGAR Drg No :2022-23/GAD/04 DATE SCALE : NTS NEW DELHI-110049 J.E. A.E. E.E.
REVISION
426
CL OF EXP.JOINT C
L OF EXP.JOINT
NOTES:
20000 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERS AND LEVELS ARE
IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
RECESS FOR 18500 2. DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, ONLY WRITTEN
CL BRG CL BRG
EXP.JOINT DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED
(TYP) 3. GRADE OF CONCRETE FOR VARIOUS COMPONENTS SHALL
750 750
BE AS FOLLOWS:
350
DECK SLAB-----------------------M30
LONGITUDINAL GIRDER-----------------M30
CROSS GIRDER---------------------M30
225
CRASH BARRIER --------------------M30
1575
4. RECESS FOR EXPANSION JOINT SHOWN IS INDICATIVE

300 ONLY. RECESS AND NECESSARY INSERTS FOR EXPANSION
JOINTS SHALL BE AS PER MANUFACTURER'S REQUIREMENTS
AND SHALL BE GOT APPROVED BEFORE CASTING OF DECK
400 SLAB.
5. DRAINAGE SPOUT SHOWN IN THE DRAWING ARE
TENTATIVE ONLY. IT MAY REQUIRE TO ADJUST AS PER SITE
350 1000 1200 1200 1000 350 CONDITION.
SECTIONAL ELEVATION A-A
C C
L BRG
L OF EXP.JT C
C
L BRG L OF EXP.JT
750 5000 (TYP) DRAINAGE SPOUT (TYP)

600 700
500
2375 2375
CL EXP. GAP CBRG
1200
L
DECK SLAB
L BRG
20 750
C
225
350
1000 1200
300
3000
CROSS GIRDER
300
300
350
350
L BRG
8400
7500
8500
600
600
400
C
SECTION E-E
300
3000
400 400
L BRG
C
1200
500
5000(TYP)
750 20000 750 CL EXP. GAP CBRG
L
PLAN POCKET FOR EXPANSION JOINT
8400
750
8400
350
450 7500 450 450 7500 450
65 THK. WEARING COURSE C

L BRIDGE
65 THK. WEARING COURSE C
L BRIDGE RCC CRASH
BARRIER FINISHED LEVEL
FINISHED LEVEL SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2% 200
SLOPE 2% SLOPE 2%
150
150
680 600
300
SECTION D-D
CROSS GIRDER
225
225
150X300 75X150
1100
600 HAUNCH (TYP)
HAUNCH (TYP)
1575
300
DRAINAGE (TYP)
150
DRAINAGE (TYP)
250
250
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
CONSTRUCTION JOINT
(TYP)
(TYP)
250
250
600 600 600 600 600

600
1200 3000 3000 1200 1200 3000 3000 1200
C C
L GIRDER
C C
L GIRDER L GIRDER C
L GIRDER
L GIRDER C
L GIRDER
SECTION B-B SECTION C-C
PROJECT: DISTRICT : WEST CHAMPARAN DRAWING TITLE: CONSULTANTS: R.W.D Works Division,
DIVISION : BAGHA-1 DETAILS OF SUPERSTRUCTURE
BLOCK : RAMNAGAR DATE
427
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES UNLESS
75X7=525
CL OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
BRG
2. DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED, ONLY WRITTEN
DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE FOLLOWED.
(a7)
(a7)
3. ALL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN THIS DRAWING ARE TMT
(a6) BARS CONFORMING TO I.S:1786 GRADE Fe 500D
4. BOND LENGTH SHALL BE AS PER IRC:112. MINIMUM BOND
LENGTH SHALL BE 58 TIMES DIA OF BAR. NOT MORE THAN
50% OF THE BARS SHALL BE LAPPED AT ANY SECTION.
950 MINIMUM LAP LENGTH SHALL BE 1.4 TIMES BOND LENGTH
(a6)
(a6)
(FOR LAP LENGTH SMALLER DIAMETER TO BE CONSODERED).
(a7)
5. CLEAR COVER TO ANY REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE 40mm.
DETAIL OF BAR "a6" & "a7" (a7)

DETAIL MESH-M2 (ONLY BAR "a6" AND "a7" SHOWN) (a6)
CL CL 2L-10 @ 200 c/c
(a6)
EXP. BRG 2L-12 @ 175 c/c (a11)
2L-12 @ 200 c/c
3093 14-12
(a9) (L.V) (a10)
14-12 (a8a) 2-16 (a6) (a8)
(a6)+(a7) CL OF SYMMETRY
2-16 (a7) 175 175
950
(TYP)
400
(a9) (a11)
(EQUALLY SPACED)
(a8) ON EACH FACE
(EQUALLY SPACED)
(a8a) ON EACH FACE
10 LINKS 3 NOS 10 LINKS 3 NOS
950
(a12) (a12)
WITH EVERY 3rd STP. WITH EVERY
(STAGGERED) (STAGGERED)
(TYP)
1600
(a4) (a5)
1850
12 @200 c/c (a13)

1850 a5 a4 a4 a4 a5
MESH TYPE-M2 (a13) 3- 25 (a4)+2-25 (a5) a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3 a3
(TWO LAYERS) 5-25 (a3) a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2 a2
AT 20mm & 100mm 5-25 (a2) a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1 a1
FROM BOTTOM
5-25 (a1) 15/25 SPACER BAR 20/25 SPACER BAR
(TYP) (TYP)
2412 2413 2412 2413
SECTION A-A SECTION B-B

DETAILS OF OUTER GIRDER
CL CL 2L-10 @ 200 c/c

EXP. BRG (b11)
2L-12 @ 175 c/c (b7)
3093 2L-12 @ 200 c/c
(b10) 14-12
(b9) (L.V)
14-12 (b8a) 2-16 (b6) (b8) (b6) (b6)
CL OF SYMMETRY
(b6)+(b7) 175 175
2-16 (b7)
950
(TYP)
400
(b9) (b11)
950
(EQUALLY SPACED)
(b8a) ON EACH FACE
10 LINKS 3 NOS (b12) 10 LINKS 3 NOS
(EQUALLY SPACED)
(b8) ON EACH FACE
WITH EVERY 3rd STP. WITH EVERY
(TYP)
1600
(STAGGERED) (STAGGERED)
(b6) (b5) 1850
(b4)
MESH TYPE-M2 1850 3-25 (b5)+ 2-25 (b6)

(b13)
(TWO LAYERS) 3-25 (b3)+2-25 (b4)
AT 20mm & 100mm 5-25 (b2)
FROM BOTTOM 12 @200 c/c(b13)
5-25 (b1) b6 b5 b5 b5 b6
b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b3 b4 b3 b4 b3
b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2 b2
2412 2413 2412 2413 b1 b1 b1 b1 b1
b1 b1 b1 b1 b1
15/25 SPACER BAR 20/25 SPACER BAR
(TYP)
DETAILS OF INNER GIRDER (TYP)
SECTION C-C SECTION D-D
DIVISION: BAGHA-1 DETAILS OF LONGITUDINAL GIRDER
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) PIPRA TO GARDI DRG No:2022-23/RCC/01 REVISION SCALE : NTS Extension,Part-1 New Delhi -110049 J.E. A.E. E.E.
428
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2. DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED,
ONLY WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE
FOLLOWED.
3. ALL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN THIS
DRAWING ARE TMT BARS CONFORMING TO
I.S:1786 GRADE Fe 500D
4. CLEAR COVER TO ANY REINFORCEMENT
SHALL BE 40mm.
5. THE LOCATION OF JACKS FOR LIFTING OF
THE SUPERSTRUCTURE TO REPLACE THE
BEARINGS IS SHOWN. THIS SHALL BE
DISTINCTLY ETCHED FOR EASY
IDENTIFICATION ON THE END CROSS
GIRDERS AND PIER/ABUTMENT CAPS
6. DURING THE LIFTING OPERATION, ALL
THE SIX JACKS PLACED UNDER THE END
CROSS GIRDERS IN LINE WITH THE
BEARINGS SHALL BE OPERATED
SIMULTANEOUSLY USING SINGLE
OPERATING CONSOLEE, GROUPING THE
PUMP AND CONTROL SYSTEM, SO AS TO
ENSURE THAT THE REACTIONS
7. ON ALL THE SIX JACK ARE EQUAL AT ALL
TIMES. BOND LENGTH SHALL BE AS PER
ICR:112. MINIMUM BOND LENGTH SHALL
BE 58 TIMES DIA OF BAR. NOT MORE THAN
50% OF THE BARS SHALL BE LAPPED AT
ANY SECTION. MINIMUM LAP LENGTH
SHALL BE 1.4 TIMES BOND LENGTH SHALL
BE 1.4 TIMES BOND LENGTH (FOR LAP
LENGTH SMALLER DIAMETER TO BE
CONSIDERED).
DIVISION: BAGHA-1 DETAILS OF CROSS GIRDER
429
NOTES:
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETRES
UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2. DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED,
ONLY WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ARE TO BE
FOLLOWED.
3. ALL REINFORCEMENT SHOWN IN THIS
DRAWING ARE TMT BARS CONFORMING TO
I.S:1786 GRADE Fe 500D
4. BOND LENGTH SHALL BE AS PER
IRC:112. MINIMUM BOND LENGTH SHALL
BE 58 TIMES DIA OF BAR. NOT MORE THAN
50% OF THE BARS SHALL BE LAPPED AT
ANY SECTION. MINIMUM LAP LENGTH
SHALL BE 1.4 TIMES BOND LENGTH (FOR
LAP LENGTH SMALLER DIAMETER TO BE
CONSIDERED).
5. CLEAR COVER TO ANY REINFORCEMENT
SHALL BE 40mm.
LEGEND
TOP FACE
BOTTOM FACE
DIVISION: BAGHA-1 DETAILS OF DECK SLAB
430
NOTES-
1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM, & LEVELS
ARE IN METERS UNLESS OTHERWISE
SPECIFIED
2. DIMENSIONS ARE NOT TO BE SCALED.
ONLY WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL BE
FOLLOWED
3. THIS DRG. SHALL BE READ IN
CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER RELEVANT
DRGS.
4. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE HIGH
YIELD STRENGTH DEFORMED (TMT) BARS
(GRADE-Fe 500D). CONFORMING IS:1786
5. MINIMUM LAP LENGTH WHEREVER
REQUIRED SHALL BE 76xDIAMETRE OF BAR
6. NOT MORE THAN 50% OF
REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE LAPPED AT ANY
LOCATION
7. ALL LAPS SHALL BE SUITABLY
STAGGERED AND MINIMUM CLEAR
DISTANCE BETWEEN LAPS SHALL BE 0.33
TIMES THE LAP LENGTHS
8. CLEAR COVER TO OUTER MOST REINF.
SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:-
SECTION A-A SECTION B-B a) PILE&PILE CAP : 75mm
b) SUBSTRUCTURE : 40mm
9. ANCHORAGE OF SPIRAL REINF. SHALL
BE PROVIDED BY ONE AND HALF EXTRA
TURNS OF SPIRAL BAR AT EACH END OF A
SPIRAL UNIT.
D D
SECTION D-D
E E
SECTION E-E
TYP. DETAIL INDICATING

ANCHORAGE OF
STIRRUP
PLAN SHOWING PILE CAP REINF. SECTION C-C SECTION D-D REINF. DETAIL OF PILE
SHOWING REINF. IN PIER SHOWING REINF. IN PIER
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF PIER SHAFT & PILE Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 KM IN DIVISION: BAGHA-1
431
NOTES-
SPECIFIED
E FOLLOWED
C B
DRGS.
4. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE HIGH
YIELD STRENGTH DEFORMED (TMT) BARS
(GRADE-Fe 500D). CONFORMING IS:1786
5. MINIMUM LAP LENGTH WHEREVER
REQUIRED SHALL BE 76xDIAMETRE OF BAR
6. NOT MORE THAN 50% OF
REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE LAPPED AT ANY
LOCATION.
1 STAGGERED AND MINIMUM CLEAR
E B DISTANCE BETWEEN LAPS SHALL BE 0.33
TIMES THE LAP LENGTHS.
8. CLEAR COVER TO OUTER MOST REINF.
SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:-
a) SUBSTRUCTURE : 40mm
9. PEDESTAL SHALL BE CAST ONLY AFTER
C SECTION A-A FIXING OF BEARING ANCHOR SLEEVES,
ALTERNATIVELY POCKET MAY BE LEFT FOR
A TYP. DETAIL INDICATING
BEARING SLEEVES.
ANCHORAGE OF STIRRUP
LEGEND:
BAR ON TOP FACE
BAR ON BOTTOM FACE
DIA FOR BAR 'D'
SECTION B-B SECTION C-C SECTION D-D SECTION E-E
TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
TRAFFIC
DIRECTION
T 8 MESH REINF.
DETAIL-1 PLAN SHOWING REINF. PLAN SHOWING REINF. T 8 MESH REINF. AT JACK LOCATION AND
A IN PEDESTAL TEMP. BEARING
SHOWING REINF. IN IN LONGITUDINAL TYPE- I
SEISMIC STOPPER (TYP.) BEARING TYPE-II
PLAN SHOWING REINF. IN PIER CAP TRANSVERSE SEISMIC STOPPER (TYP.)
SECTION F-F
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF PIER, PIER CAP ETC Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIVISION: BAGHA-1
BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 KM IN C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society, South
432
D
OF CARRIAGEWAY
NOTES-
24 25 29 34 34 32
31 33 1. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE IN MM, & LEVELS
19 29
29 SPECIFIED.
12 Nos. 10 FOLLOWED.
60
1 (DISTRIBUTION)
19 12 3 Nos.
ABUTMENT AND RETURN WALL

300
20 16 @100/c
A A
21 16 @100/c
18 16 @120 c/c 12 @120 c/c
16
22 22 10 @100/c
18 18 15
20
23 12 @100/c
59 14 16 @120 c/c 250
23 15 17A 24 10 @200/c
19 14 8 @1000 c/c
B 17 B 25 12 @200/c
21 16
2000
17A
10 + 11 8 / 8a + 9 26 12 2 Nos.
8 + 9 10 + 11 8a + 9
2000
27 NOT USED
28 NOT USED
29 16 3 Nos.
300
5 8a 8 5
13 13
DECK SLAB REINFORCEMENT 30 NOT USED
12 8+9 8a+9 12
31 12 2 Nos.
CRASH BARRIER
REINFORCEMENT DETAILS 32 12 @100/c
DIRT WALL
5 6 6 5 33 10 @100/c
D SECTION A-A
(STIRRUPS TO BE AVOIDED UNDER ABUTMENT) VIEW B-B 34 10 @200/c ON BOTH FACE
(ELEVATION SHOWING REINF. IN ABUTMENT WALL AND DIRT WALL) 35 @100/c
TRAFFIC DIRECTION 12
(STIRRUPS TO BE AVOIDED UNDER ABUTMENT)
13
OF AUTMENT 18 18A
36 12 5 Nos.
2L-400/c
37 10 IN 3 LAYERS
BAR BAR
SPACING/NOS. SHAPE REMARKS 38 16 10 Nos.
17A MARK DIA
ABUTMENT CAP
1200
1 25 10 Nos. ALT. WITH 2
39 10 2L@150/c
PILE
PILE CUT OFF
LEVEL. 2 25 10 Nos. ALT. WITH 1
300
40 12 8 Nos.
16 16A 3 10 @150c/c
6
41 12 8 Nos.
4 4 16 @100c/c
1200
9 16 16A
1000
500 C C 5 42 20 10 Nos.
20 @125/c
LONG. SEISMIC STOPPER

8a 8
8 8a
14 1 + 2 20 43 16 10 Nos.
15
6 @125/c
7 NOT USED 44 12 2L@150/c
8 12 @250/c ALT. WITH 9 45 12 NOT USED
PILE CAP
EARTH FACE
EARTH FACE
8a 12 @250/c ALT. WITH 9

NEAR FACE
NEAR FACE
12 12 46 12 2 Nos. ON BOTH FACE
9 12 @250/c ALT. WITH 8&8a
47 12 4L@150/c
10 12 @250/c ALT. WITH 11
OF ABUTMENT CAP/
PEDESTAL(FREE BRG.)
48 16 12 Nos. ON BOTH FACE
ABUTMENT/CARRIAGEWAY 11 12 @250/c ALT. WITH 10
5
49 12 8 Nos. ON BOTH FACE
12 12 8 Nos.
13 12 8 Nos.
3 50 12 2L@100/c
17
14 16 100/c
A A 51 10 2L@100/c
14A NOT USED
52 10 2L@100/c
15 12 100/c
53 20 10 Nos.
HAUNCH TRA.SEISMIC STOPPER

11 1 + 2
15A NOT USED
54 16 10 Nos.
10
16 12 @100/c 55 6 06 Nos.
ON BOTH FACE
16A 16 @100/c
56 12 2L@150/c
STAGGERED IN
17 10 @300/c ELEVATION 57 12 6L@150/c
STAGGERED IN
58
75
17A 12 2L/100 + 1L/100 12 2L@150/c

ELEVATION
REFER NOTE No.9 59 12 @100/c
13 18 12 8 Nos. EACH FACE
18 18 18A NOT USED
PLAN AT A-A PLAN AT B-B REINF. DETAIL OF PILE
BIHAR RURAL ROADS CONSTRUCTION OF RCC REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF ABUTMENT Shyam Designers & Consultants Pvt.Ltd
DIVISION: BAGHA-1
433
NOTES-
D
10x70=700 SPECIFIED.
31 4x75=300 70
75
4x75=300
75
70
FOLLOWED.
10x70=700
300
DRGS.
T 8 MESH REINF. 4. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE HIGH
36 AT JACK LOCATION AND YIELD STRENGTH DEFORMED (TMT) BARS
37 AND GRADE (Fe 500D) CONFORMING TO
35 TEMP. BEARING T 8 MESH REINF. THESE BARS TO BE BENT
TYP. DETAIL INDICATING IS: 1786
TYPE-II TYPE- I AFTER THE PLACEMENT OF
ANCHORAGE OF STIRRUP 5. CLEAR COVER TO OUTER MOST
300
BOTTOM MOST MESH R/F REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:-

TYPE-I
34 34 a. PILE&PILE CAP - 75mm
MESH REINF. TYPE-I IN TWO b. ABUTMENT,ABUTMENT CAP,DIRT WALL,
LAYERS AT 20mm & 100mm RETURN WALL ETC. - 40mm
FROM THE TOP CONCRET 54 6. MINIMUM LAP LENGTH WHEREVER
32 33 FACE.
46 56 + 57 REQUIRED SHALL BE 76xDIAMETRE OF BAR
38 7. NOT MORE THAN 50% OF
44 + 47
50 + 51 58 REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE LAPPED AT ANY
300
43 42 LOCATION
300
STAGGERED AND MINIMUM CLEAR
300
39 49 53
DISTANCE BETWEEN LAPS SHALL BE 0.33
600
48 1200 TIMES THE LAP LENGTHS.
33 9. ANCHORAGE OF SPIRAL REINF. SHALL
55
41 41 BE PROVIDED BY ONE AND HALF EXTRA
TURNS OF SPIRAL BAR AT EACH END OF A
1500
32
SPIRAL UNIT.
52 10. THIS DRAWING SHALL BE READ IN
CONJUNCTION WITH DRAWING NO.
2022-23/RCC/07
40
LEGEND:-
600
TOP / NEAR FACE REINF.
ABUTMENT REINF. BOTTOM / EARTH FACE REINF.
SECTION F-F SECTION G-G SECTION H-H DETAIL-2

SHOWING REINF. IN TRANSVERSE STOPPER
1
DIRT WALL REINF.
46 HITTING SIDE
47
TRAFFIC 53
DIRECTION
4 58
CURVED
49
HITTING FACE
42
600
43 2
44 52 10d
55
(TYP.) 55
45 48 48
MESH (TYP.)
56 57
46 51 50
54
49
PLAN SHOWING REINF. SECTION C-C DETAIL-1 PLAN SHOWING REINF.

PLAN SHOWING REINF.IN
LONGITUDINAL SEISMIC STOPPER IN PEDESTAL FOR TRANSVERSE STOPPER
BEARING
DIVISION: BAGHA-1 REINFORCEMENT DETAILS OF ABUTMENT CAP, PILE ETC
DEVELOPMENT AGENCY BRIDGE AT CH 3+100 Km IN C-28 Lower GF, Housing Society, South
(GOVT. OF BIHAR) PIPRA TO GARDI DRG No:2022-23/RCC/08 SCALE : NTS Extension,Part-1 New Delhi -110049 J.E. A.E. E.E.
BLOCK: RAMNAGAR DATE REVISION
434

DPR Pipra To Gardi CH 3+100km

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

DPR Pipra To Gardi CH 3+100km

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

pradhan mantri gram sadak yojana (pmgsy-III)

PACKAGE NO. : BR37SHYM02

Name of Road : PIPRA To GARDI

Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100

Cost of Bridge : 973.237 Lakh

Submitted By: Prepared By:

NAME OF BRIDGE : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in

DISTRICT : West Champaran

LENGTH OF BRIDGE : 220.00 m

Sl. No. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.)

1 COST OF BRIDGE STRUCTURE 861.271

2 COST OF APPROACH 25.473

5 YEARS MAINTENANCE COST (IN LACS)= 0.209

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

NAME OF BRIDGE : Construction Of RCC HL Bridge At Ch 3+100 KM in

DISTRICT : West Champaran

Sl. No. DESCRIPTION AMOUNT (RS.)

1 COST OF FOUNDATION 50374845.18

2 COST OF SUB STRUCTURE 9393447.52

3 COST OF SUPER STRUCTURE 26256388.83

4 COST OF PROTECTION WORK 102453.57

5 COST OF APPROCH 1554384.51

6 COST OF DIVERSION 992961.24

TOTAL COST = 88674480.84

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

PRADHAN MANTRI GRAM SADAK YOJNA (PMGSY-III)

DISTRICT WISE SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSALS FOR THE YEAR 2021-22

Total Cost of Bridge including Approach

1 West Champaran BR37SHYM02 220.000 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001

TOTAL 1 0 220.000 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001

TOTAL 220 60.000 973.237 4.424 1003.796 0.253 4.563 0.001

Junior Engineer Assistant Engineer Executive Engineer

3 Name of Road : PIPRA To GARDI

4 Total Length of Approach Road (m) :- 60.00 m

6 Length of the Proposed Bridge (Excluding Approaches) : 220.00 m

7 Width of Bridge (in mt) : 8.45

8 Through Route/ Link Route Nos. as per Core Network :

(i) Is the road a part of core network :

* if Yes, Sl. No. of road CN-I : Sl. No. of CN-VI :

* if Yes, Through Route/ Link Route No. : MRL18

9 Whether the Road proposal was sanctioned earlier :

Phase : MoRD Sanction No. : Date :

Length : Chainage : From : To :

(ii) Cost of the Road Work sanctioned : Rs : Lakhs

Bridge Super Structure 296.697 1.3486

Substructure & Foundation 675.382 3.0699

Others 14.152 0.0643

TOTAL 1003.796 4.571

H. Specification :- 267.68 MoRD Share :- 441.67 State Share :- 294.45

Enroule Habitations Name / Chainage

Proposed Bridge Location

13 Typical Photographs of proposed bridge location.

(i) U/S of Bridge

(iii) D/S of Bridge

(i) Submersible structures like vented causeway or Submersible Bridge

(ii) Box Bridge

(iii) Bridge with RCC Pier and Abutments √

a. Type of Foundation (Open/ Raft/ Well/ any other) Pile

b. Bearing Capacity at Foundation level 15 T

c. Aggangement of Span 11 X 18.5 M

Total Span 11 Nos of Vents 11 Clear Span of Vents 18.5

d. Critical Levels Road Top Level (RTL) 103.51

Catchment Area should be based on hydrological Survey or from toposheet