Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Public Interest Litigation
Public Interest Litigation
IN D E X
PARTICULAR DETAILS Page
S.No. S N0.
1. Memo Of 2
Urgency
2. Memo Of 3-4
Parties
3. List of Dates 5-6
11. Annexure VII Copy of letter no. DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/307 dated 09- 28-29
10-2019 and copy of letter no.
DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/339 dated 11-10-2019
12. Annexure Copy of letter no. DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/341-47 dated 30
VIII 12-10-2019
17. Annexure copy of the report submitted by Patwari Halqa dated 35-36
XIII 02-03-2020
18. Annexure XIV Copy of Job card along with Muster roll Report 37-40
19. Annexure XV copy of the Vendor Wise Expenditure dated 02-Nov. 41-45
2020
20. Annexure XVI Copies of the two job cards issued in the name of 46-47
Naresh Kumar
28. Vaklatnama 56
FILED BY:
MEMO OF URGENCY
1. That the applicant/petitioner has filed the above titled Public Interest
Litigation before the Hon’ble Court which is sure to succeed on merits.
2. That the matter is of urgent nature and it is in the interest of justice that the
case be directed to be listed in supplementary list for its hearing and order
today.
3. That the matter is of urgent nature and it is in the interest of justice that the
case be directed to be listed in today’s supplementary list for its disposal.
PETITIONER
Through Counsel
Place: Jammu
Date: 21-04-2021 Ankush Manhas
Advocate
3|Page
MEMO OF PARTIES
Ghulam Quadir Dar, Age 55 Years,
S/O Muna Dar, R/O Village Seal, Tehsil & District Doda.
….PETITIONER…
VERSUS
13. Adil Hussain Shah, Vendor, S/O Altaf Hussain Shah, R/O
Bhandass District Doda,
14. Riaz Ahmed Attu, S/O Ghulam Qadir Attu R/O Dhar
15. Manoj Kumar Block Development Officer, at present
Gundna Doda,
16. Barkat Ali, MPW S/O Raza Mohd, R/O Panchayat Seel
Block Dali Udhyanpur,
17. Shabir Ahmed GRS, S/O Nazir Ahmed, R/O Jijote,
Panchayat Seel Block Dali Udhyanpur,
18. Tilak Raj, Junior Assistant , Rural Development
Department, Block Dali Udhyanpur Doda.
19. Ashok Kumar MIS Operator, Block Dali Udhyanpur Doda
20. Shiv Charan (Operator), Junior Assistant ACD Office
Doda.
21. Sarpanch Nasreena Begum W/O Nissar Ahmed Butt, at
present Panchayat Seel Block Dali Udhyanpur.
…. RESPONDENTS.…
FILED BY:
LIST OF DATES
11-02-2016 Circular no. ACDD/Circular/2015-2016 dated
30-09-2019 The ADC Doda again directed the BDO, Dali Udhyanpur
09-10-2019 The ADC Doda once again directed the BDO, Dali
16-12-2019 The ASP Doda to provide the detail report and authentic
report.
Petitioner
Through Counsel
PLACE: JAMMU.
DATED: Ankush Manhas
Advocate
7|Page
….PETITIONER…
VERSUS
1. U.T of J&K, Through Commissioner Secretary Rural Development
Department, Civil Secretariat, Jammu/Srinagar.
2. Director MGNREGA, Govt. of India, Rural Development
Department Krishan Bhawan New Delhi.
3. Assistant Commissioner Development, Doda.
4. Director Anti-Corruption Bureau J&K,
5. Director General of Police Jammu.
6. Additional Superintendent of Police HQRS Doda,
7. Muneer Khan, the then SHO Police Station Doda at present SHO
Ramsoo, Range Ramban.
8. ASI Mushtaq Ahmed, at present Incharge Post Gwari Gandoh,
9. Mohd Ashraf Havaldar, S/O Mohd Rustam Sheikh at present
Police Station Doda.
10. Santosh Kumar, Block Development Officer Dali Udhyanpur,
District Doda.
11. Amit Kumar Junior Engineer, Rural Engineering Wing, Rural
Development Department, Doda.
12. Nisar Ahmed Butt, Vendor, S/O Abdul Gani Butt, R/O Seel
District Doda,
13. Adil Hussain Shah, Vendor, S/O Altaf Hussain Shah, R/O
Bhandass District Doda,
14. Riaz Ahmed Attu, S/O Ghulam Qadir Attu R/O Dhar
8|Page
…. RESPONDENTS.…
2. That the petitioner is filing the present petition in Public interest. The
petitioner has no personal interest in the petition and the petition is not
guided by self-gain and there is no motive other than public interest in
filing the said petition.
3. That the petitioner in the present petition is using legal tool which allow
individuals, groups and communities to challenge govt. decisions and
activities in a court of Law for the enforcement of public interest. The
illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional conduct of the respondents who
are hell bent upon ignoring and violating the mandate of the
Constitution of India, constrained the petitioner to approach this
Hon’ble High Court.
11. That Addl. Deputy Commissioner once again directed the BDO, Dali
Udhyanpur(RespondentNo.3) vide letter no. DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/307
dated 09-10-2019 to attend his office alongwith AEE, JE and VLW of
Panchayat Kalihand and thereafter the Addl. Deputy Commissioner vide
letter no. DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/339 dated 11-10-2019 informed BDO
Dali Udhyanpur(Respondent No.3) about the date fixed by him for
visiting in Kalihand panchayat and directed BDO Dali Udhyanpur to
remain on spot along with AEE, JE, VLW, GRS and concerned Sarpanch
as well as prominent persons/Laborers of the said Panchayat.
13. That during the investigation it was found that a payment was made
without bill of the work namely” Constt. Of P/Path at Gowari to Road”
Panchayat Seel Block Dali Udhyanpur executed during the year 2015-
2016 and BDO Dali Udhyanpur(Respondent No.3) was directed by ADC
Doda to explain the reason for making that payment Vide letter no.
DVO/D/Vigilance/2019/476 dated 09/12/2019.
15. That some other frauds were also committed by the officials of the
department in connivance with Nisar Ahmed Bhat S/O Abdul Gani Bhat,
Mohd Ajmal Ganai, Mushtaq Ahmed, Adil Hussain, Masqoor Ahmed,
Mohd Ilyas, Fareed Ahmed Bhat, Bhat sons, Bhat Constructions by
disproportioning the assets of MG-NAREGA, SBM CSC, 14th FC,
MPLAD,CDF,PMAYG,IAY Block Dali Udhyanpur in connivance with
officers/officials of Block Udhyanpur by drawing amounts on account of
14 | P a g e
MGNAREGA and other heads on fraudulent manners for the year 2014
to till date. A complaint was made in this regard to Addl.
Superintendent of Police HQRS Doda who vide letter NO. ASP-
Doda/CLt/2019/2216-18 dated 16-12-2019 directed respondent no. 3 to
provide the detail report and authentic record with regard to amounts
drawn.
17. That ASP Doda vide letter no. ASP/Doda/Clt/2020/168-171 dated 29-
01-2020 requested to depute concerned patwari/staff at the sight of
disputed land for demarcation and after doing needful submitted the
report.
18. That the concerned patwari visited the spot of disputed land and
submitted the report.
19. That it is also pertinent to mention here that elected sarpanch and
employee of BDO Dali Udhyanpur have appointed a dead person
namely Ramesh Kumar for work in work register under MG-NEREGA.
15 | P a g e
The said person died on 3rd July 2019 but still the attendance of that
dead person is being regularly marked.
Copy of Job card along with Muster roll Report is enclosed herewith and
marked as ANNEXURE-XIV.
20. That the residents of area have complained before every authority,
wherever they could approach, but till date just inquiries have been
made but nothing substantial have been done in this regard. DC Doda
did seize some files but nothing more have been done by him also.
Hence at this stage the petitioner is left with no other efficacious
remedy available to them except to file the PIL before this Hon’ble
court.
21. That the Sarpanch of Seel namely Nasreena Begum W/O Nisar Ahmed
Bhat has managed to get the majority of works in the name of her
husband in the year 2019-20, 2020-21 and in connivance with the
officials of the department has withdrawn a huge amount against the
supply of material which infact has never been supplied on grounds.
22. That the officials of the department issued two job cards in the name of
one person namely Naresh Kumar and issued various works to the said
Naresh Kumar against his two job cards and accordingly released a
huge amount in his favour. This has been done by the officials of
department in connivance with the Sarpanch of the area Panchayat
Seel Nasreena Begum and village level worker Barkat Ali and MIS
Operator Ashok Kumar.
Copies of the two job cards issued in the name of Naresh Kumar are
enclosed here with and collectively marked as Annexure-XVI
26. That upon the complaint filed by one of the locals Mohammad Ishaq
Dar, the Assistant Commissioner development Doda constituted a
committee of two persons to inquire into the complaint and directed it
to furnish the detailed enquiry report within three days along with
recommendations. It is worthwhile to mention here that even after
formation of the said committee on 11-01-2021, nothing substantial has
been done till date.
A copy of the letter dated 11-01-2021 is enclosed here with and
marked as Annexure-XX
28. That the respondents have completely violated the norms and
guidelines of 14th -15th FC, since 2015-16 till date. The works as per the
said plans were not executed on ground level. There is huge
discrepancy in the execution of works and the supply of material for the
works claimed to be done under these plans. The private respondents
including high officials of the Rural Development Department and
Panchayat Seel have managed to misappropriate the govt. funds and
have released lacs of rupees in favour of their blue-eyed persons. Also,
under back to Village 2nd programme the motorable road from Tolwal to
Chakri Bhandass has been allotted to one blue eyed person without
tendering and many CD Panchayat works also have been allotted to the
persons of their choice without following the due process of law,
resulting in non-execution of works by them.
29. That the petitioner has based the instant petition from authentic
information and documents obtained from various Govt. departments
and has determined the veracity of the same.
30. That the petition, if allowed, would benefit the citizens of the area
generally as a rule of law is essential for Democracy and such brazen
violation of law by the respondents can be stopped by the orders of this
Hon’ble court only.
31. That the petitioner has not filed any other case, appeal or writ petition
on the same subject matter before any court including the Apex Court.
An affidavit in support is enclosed herewith.
18 | P a g e
IN THE PREMISES : -
Petitioner
Through Counsel
Dated: 21-04-2021
Place: Jammu
Ankush Manhas
Advocate
20 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-I
21 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-II
22 | P a g e
23 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-III
24 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-IV
25 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-V
26 | P a g e
27 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-VI
28 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-VII
29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-VIII
31 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-IX
32 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-X
33 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XI
34 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XII
35 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XIII
36 | P a g e
37 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XIV
38 | P a g e
39 | P a g e
40 | P a g e
41 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XV
42 | P a g e
43 | P a g e
44 | P a g e
45 | P a g e
46 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XVI
47 | P a g e
48 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XVII
49 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XVIII
50 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XIX
51 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XX
52 | P a g e
ANNEXURE-XXI
53 | P a g e
I, Ghulam Quadir Dar, Age 55Years, S/O Muna Dar, R/O Village
Seal, Tehsil & District Doda., J&K, do hereby state on oath/solemn
affirmation that I have read the petition and that the contents of
paras 01 to 27 of the petition are true to my personal knowledge and
those of paras 28 to 31 are true upon legal advice received by me
which I believe to be true.
Deponent
54 | P a g e
And I/We undertake that I/We or my/our duly authorized agent shall appear in the court on all hearings.
And I/we the undersigned, do hereby agree that in the event of the above cause taken up on tour.. I/We shall par
extra fees. And I/We the undersigned, do hereby agree not to hold Advocate or his substitute responsible for the
said cause is called up for hearing or for any negligence of the said substitute. I undertake to remain present in the
court on every date of case.
And I/We undersigned, do hereby agree that in the event of the whole or any part of the fee agree by
me/us to be paid to the Advocate preparing unpaid he shall be entitled to withdraw from the prosecution of the
said cause without notice. If any costs of allowed for an adjournment the Advocate would be entitled the same.
And I/We undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and confirm all such acts, as if done by me/us for all
intents and purpose. I/We do herby set/our hand/s to the present the contents of which have been understood by
me/us on 20th April 2021.
Ankush Manhas
ADVOCATE CLIENT
57 | P a g e
Petitioner’s Counsel
manhasankush21@gmail.com
58 | P a g e
IN THE PREMISES::
It is therefore most humbly prayed that the present application be allowed
and the time be granted for the depositing the court fee as well as attested
affidavit later in time in the interest of justice.
ANKUSH MANHAS
Advocate
59 | P a g e
I, Ghulam Quadir Dar, Age 55 Years, S/O Muna Dar, R/O Village
Seal, Tehsil & District Doda. J&K. do hereby state on oath/solemn
affirmation that I have read the application and that the contents of
paras 01 to 03 of the application are true to my personal knowledge and
those of para 01 to 03 are true upon legal advice received by me which
I believe to be true.
Deponent