Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Agronomy Journal - 1990 - Lawlor - Seed Production Environment Influence On The Base Temperature For Growth of Sorghum
Agronomy Journal - 1990 - Lawlor - Seed Production Environment Influence On The Base Temperature For Growth of Sorghum
types might be indicative of an adaptation property of the reader and do not imply any endorsement.
LAWLOR ET AL.: SEED PRODUCTION ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCE ON SORGHUM 645
0.6 X X
Table 1. Adaptation type, and thermal units (TU) and mean base
temperature (T.s, T.,R, T.G) required for shoot elongation, root
0.5 elongation, and germination of six sorghum genotypes produced
X
z at three locations.
0
U.i= - 0.4 Shoot
elongation
Root
elongation Germination
0<('7 Adaptation
~~ ~ 0.3 Genotype typet r.s TV T.R TV T.G TV
<C ~ 0
a:wa:- 0.2 oc oc d-1 oc oc d-1 oc oc d-1
BT X 623 TA 10.6 75.2 9.7 44.2 5.3 31.9
<!J T X 09 TA 10.3 68.5 10.5 39.5 5.9 27.8
0.1
BT X 399 TE 10.0 92.7 11.0 51.0 9.1 27.1
RT X 7000 TE t t 9.4 55.6 7.4 30.2
0'~--~-+------+------+------+-----~ BT X 378 TE 9.9 100.5 9.3 70.4 8.7 38.3
4 8 12 16 20 24 BT X 398 TE 9.7 90.1 8.6 65.2 8.5 31.9
0
MEAN TEMPERATURE ( C) LSD (0.05) 1.3 15.5 1.8 15.2 2.3 9.4
(NS) (NS)
Fig. I. Rate of germination of sorghum vs. mean temperature of the
seeds for genotype BT X 623. t Adaptation type as classified by Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. sorghum breeders:
TA = tropically adapted; TE = temperately adapted.
t Insufficient data to determine T.S and TV.
required for (i) germination (i.e., protrusion of the radicle
from the seed), (ii) root elongation to 10 mm or longer, and Table 2. Mean base temperature (Tb) and number of TU required
(iii) shoot elongation to 10 mm or longer. Seeds were dis- for observational periods of growth of five sorghum genotypes pro-
carded after the shoot had elongated to 10 mm or longer. duced at three locations.
The relation between number of days (duration) to reach
a given observational stage [e.g., (i), (ii), or (iii) above] and Shoot Root
elongation elongation Germination
mean temperature is curvilinear. However, the rate of de-
velopment, defined as the inverse of the time to reach a Location Latitude r.s TV r.R TV r.G TV
certain developmental stage, increases linearly within a de- oc ocd-1 oc ocd-1 oc ocd-1
fined range of temperatures (Angus et al., 1981; Garcia-Hui-
dobro et al., 1982; Kanemasu et al., 1975; del Pozo et al., College Stn., TX 30°36' 10.7 74.8 10.7 48.6 8.3 28.3
Lubbock, TX 33°36' 9.7 93.1 9.9 53.1 8.2 30.4
1987). Data for most species suggest a linear relationship Manhattan, KS 39°09' 9.9 88.3 8.7 61.4 5.9 34.9
(Angus et al., 1981). When the rate is linear, extrapolation LSD (0.05) 1.0 12.0 1.3 10.7 1.6 NS
defines a base temperature, Tb, at which the rate is zero so Overall mean 10.1 85.4 9.8 54.3 7.5 31.2
that the thermal response of germination (or root or shoot
elongation) can be expressed as
1/t = (T - Tb) b The base temperature differences between the two
stages of growth (root elongation and shoot elongation)
where t is the time required to reach a particular develop- were small (0.2-1.1 °C}. The TbS and TbR values ob-
mental (or observational) stage, T ( C) the mean tempera-
0
tained were consistent with the range of base temper-
ture during this period, Tb the base temperature, and b the atures for sorghum found in the literature (e.g., 7-
reciprocal of the thermal time required for the process to
occur (Monteith, 1977). 13 oc, Angus et al., 1981; Mann et al., 1985; Thomas
The base temperature for germination ( TbG) of each geno- and Miller, 1979).
type was then determined as the x-intercept from regressing The genotype rankings for TbG were different from
the rate of germination (i.e, the reciprocal of the number of those of TbS and TbR (Table 1). The TbG values also
days required to germinate) vs. the mean temperature (of were up to 4.6 oc lower than values for TbR. This
the plate where the seed was located) (Fig. 1). The number agrees with other studies using thermogradient plates,
of thermal units (TU) required for germination was then which have found that TbG is lower (up to 3 oq than
obtained by taking the inverse of the slope of the regression laboratory or field determination of Tb for emergence
line. A similar regression was used to determine the base of numerous field crops (Angus et al., 1981), vegetable
temperature for shoot elongation (TbS) and for root elon-
gation (TbR) of each genotype. species (Bierhuizen and Wagenvoort, 1974), tomatoes
Data were analyzed by using analysis of variance (AN- (Lycopersicum esculentum) (Thompson, 1974), and
OVA) techniques (SAS Institute, Inc., 1982). Differences re- sorghum (Kanemasu et al., 1975).
ported are those that were significant at P = 0.05 based on Angus et al. (1981) pointed out that not all the seeds
the least significant difference (LSD) test. which germinate at a very low temperature develop
into emerged seedlings because of losses due to path-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ogens and exhaustion of seed reserves. This accounts
for the low values found fQr TbG, compared to TbS
Genotypic Differences
and TbR. The terminology used by various authors
There were no significant differences in TbS (mean also may be misleading. For example, Garcia-Hui-
TbS = 10.1 oq among genotypes, averaged across lo:.. dobro et aL (1982) defined a seed as germinated when
cations (Table 1). Genotype RT X 7000 from Man- the radicle was 10 mm (or longer), thus their definition
hattan, KS, produced insufficient data to determine of TbG is not germination as we have defined it, but,
TbS, so only five genotypes are discussed for TbS. The developmentally corresponds to our definition of TbR.
number ofTU required for shoot elongation were sig- This supports our use of T~ (and TbS) over TbG.
nificantly different among genotypes. The ranking of There were no significant differences among genotypes
the genotypes for TbR (Table 1) was similar to that for TU required for germination.
for TbS, although T~ showed significant differences The tropical genotypes (BT X 623 and T X 09) had
among genotypes (as TU required for root elongation). TbG values significantly lower than three of the four
646 AGRONOMY JOURNAL, VOL. 82, MAY-JUNE 1990
Table 3. Mean base temperature ( 0 C} for germination (T.G), root elongation (T.,R) and shoot elongation (Tt$) of six sorghum genotypes
produced at three locations (CS = College Station, TX; Lub = Lubbock, TX; and Man = Manhattan, KS).
r.s T.R T.G
Genotype cs Lub Man cs Lub Man cs Lub Man
T X 09 9.6 10.9 10.6 10.8 11.8 9.0 7.4 3.5 7.0
BT X 378 12.1 9.4 8.4 12.2 8.9 6.8 9.4 11.4 5.4
BT X 398 10.4 9.2 9.5 8.2 9.8 7.7 9.7 10.1 5.7
BT X 399 9.9 9.4 10.8 11.3 10.3 11.5 8.6 8.9 9.9
BT X 623 11.7 9.9 10.3 11.8 7.9 9.4 6.2 6.2 3.5
RT X 7000 t t t 10.0 10.7 7.6 8.9 9.3 3.9
LSD (0.05) 2.2 3.1 4.0
Mean 10.7 9.7 9.9 10.7 9.9 8.7 8.3 8.2 5.9
t Insufficient data to determine T.S-
temperate genotypes (Table 1), which supports the (nonsignificant) TbG over locations. Genotypes BT X
findings of Mann et al. (1985) that tropical types have 378 and BT X 398 from Manhattan had a significantly
lower TbG's than temperate types. However, tropical lower TbG than BT X 398 from Lubbock (although
genotypes had higher TbR values than three of the four not a significantly different value than College Sta-
temperate genotypes and the highest TbS values tion), whereas R T X 7000 from Manhattan had a sig-
(though not significantly higher than any of the tem- nificantly lower TbG than R T X 7000 from College
perate genotypes). This indicates that the base tem- Station or Lubbock.
perature for germination (as we have defined it) may
not be a true indication of the base temperature for CONCLUSIONS
growth of a species, although it may still be of use to Values of TbS and TbR were similar for the geno-
distinguish between tropical and temperate genotypes. types studied, ranging from 8.6 to 11.0 °C, and were
consistent with the values of base temperature for
Location Differences emergence of sorghum reported in the literature, while
For each location, TbS and TbR were similar (dif- TbG values were as much as 4.6 oc lower than re-
fering by 0.0-1.2 °C), whereas TbG was low (1.5- ported values. For use in plant growth models, a base
2.8 oc lower than TbS or TbR; Table 2). Each of the temperature calculated from a more advanced stage
three traits showed significant differences in Tb among of growth than germination is suggested because, as
locations; however, TbS was significantly different Angus et al. ( 1981) noted, not all seeds which germi-
among locations only because one of the five genotypes nate at very low temperatures develop into emerged
(i.e., BT X 378) was highly significantly different seedlings because of losses due to pathogens and ex-
among locations while the other four were not signif- haustion of seed reserves. The use of TbS or TbR over
icantly different among locations or among genotypes TbG values would thus lead to less errors in estima-
(Table 3). Thus the difference in TbS among locations tions of phenological events and yield.
in Table 2 is due to a single hybrid. Genotypes from The TbS is not affected, TbR is somewhat affected,
College Station had the highest mean Tb at each stage and TbG is more affected by the location (environ-
of growth, whereas those from Manhattan had the low- ment) of seed production. While tropical genotypes
est (though not significantly lower than those from had significantly lower TbG values than temperate
Lubbock for TbS or TbR). genotypes, TbR and TbS values were not significantly
The number ofTU required for shoot and root elon- different between tropical and temperate genotypes,
gation was significantly higher for Manhattan geno- indicating that separation of these genotypes by base
types than for those from College Station, whereas temperatures may not be plausible at later stages of
Manhattan genotypes did not differ significantly from growth.
Lubbock genotypes (Table 2). The TU required to
reach a given stage of growth (i.e., G, R, or S) was REFERENCES
inversely related to Tb at all observational periods (Ta- Abdalla, A.B., and F.R. Miller. 1982. Temperature response forger-
ble 2). mination in sorghum genotypes with temperate and tropical zone.
Sorghum News!. 25:133-134.
All genotypes, with the exception of BT X 378, Angus, J.F., R.B. Cunningham, M.W. Moncur, and D.H. Mac-
showed no significant difference in TbS over locations, Kenzie. 1981. Phasic development in field crops. I. Thermal re-
indicating that TbS is relatively constant with regard sponse in the seedling phase. Field Crop Res. 3:365-378.
Bierhuizen, J.P., and W.A. Wagenvoort. 1974. Some aspects of seed
to the location of seed production (Table 3). Four of germination in vegetables. I. The determination and application
the six genotypes showed consistent (nonsignificant) of heat sums and minimum temperature for germination. Sci.
differences in TbR over the three locations. Genotype Hortic. (Amsterdam) 2:213-219.
Burris, J.S. 1977. Effect oflocation of production and maternal par-
BT X 378 from Manhattan had a significantly lower entage on seedling vigour in hybrid maize (Zea mays). Seed Sci.
TbR than BT X 378 from College Station (although Techno!. 5:703-708.
not a significantly lower value than Lubbock), whereas del Pozo, A.H., J. Garcia-Huidobro, R. Novoa, and S. Villaseca.
BT X 623 from Lubbock had a significantly lower TbR 1987. Relationship of base temperature to development of spring
wheat. Exp. Agric. 23:21-30.
than BT X 623 from College Station (although not a Garcia-Huidobro, J., J.L. Monteith, and G.R. Squire. 1982. Time,
significantly lower value than Manhattan). Location temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum ty-
(environment) of seed production may affect the TbR phoides S. & H.). I. Constant temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 33:288-
296.
of some genotypes (two of the six in this study were Kanemasu, E.T., D.L. Bark, and E. Chin Choy. 1975. Effect of soil
affected). Three of the six genotypes had consistent temperature on sorghum emergence. Plant Soil 43:411-417.
SOFTWARE SCENE 647
Mann, J.A., E.E. Gbur, and F.R. Miller. 1985. A screening index Kozlowski (ed.) Ecophysiology of tropical crops. Academic Press,
for adaptation in sorghum cultivars. Crop Sci. 25:593-598. New York.
Mann, J.A., and F.R. Miller. 1984. Effects of environment during Ong, C.K. 1983. Response to temperature in a stand of pearl millet
seed maturation on base germination temperature and total seed (Pennisetum typhoides S. & H.). I. Vegetative development. J.
sugar content of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Sor- Exp. Bot. 34:322-336.
ghum News!. 27:148-149. SAS Institute, Inc. 1982. SAS user's guide: Statistics. SAS Institute,
McBee, G.G., R.M. Waskom, III, F.R. Miller, and R.A. Creelman. Inc., Cary, NC.
1983. Effect of senescence and nonsenescence on carbohydrates Thomas, G.L., and F.R. Miller. 1979. Base temperature forger-
in sorghum during late kernel maturity states. Crop Sci. 23:372- mination for temperate and tropically adapted sorghums. p. 24.
376. In Proc. 11th Biennial Grain Sorghum Res. Utilization Conf.,
Mohamed, H.A., J.A. Clark, and C.K. Ong. 1985. The influence of Wichita, KS. 28 Feb.-1 Mar. 1979.
temperature during seed development on the germination char- Thompson, P.A. 1974. Characterisation of the germination re-
acteristics of millet seeds. Plant, Cell Environ. 8:361-362. sponses to temperature of vegetable seeds. I. Tomatoes. Sci. Hor-
Monteith, J.L. 1977. Climate. p. 1-25. In P. de T. Alvim and T.T. tic. (Amsterdam) 2:35-54.