Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case Study Fintech
Case Study Fintech
Fintech potential to close the gap though its solutions for financial inclusion
Fintech has shown its potential to close gaps in the delivery of financial services to households
and firms in emerging markets and developing economies though its solution for financial
inclusion.
Fintech can democratize access to finance and the world can move closer to achieving financial
inclusion. Fintech has the potential to lower costs, while increasing speed and accessibility,
allowing for more tailored financial services that can scale. Over the last decade, 1.2 billion
previously unbanked adults gained access to financial services, and the unbanked population fell
by 35%, primarily boosted by the increase in mobile money accounts. While globally 1.7 billion
adults remain unbanked, Fintech is helping make financial services more accessible to an
increasing number of people.
Beyond mobile money, Fintech has also shown promise in areas such as Government to Person
payments and cross-border remittances. Our paper on Digital Financial Services explains how
this potential has been apparent during the COVID-19 crisis, when digital delivery channels have
helped governments quickly and securely reach vulnerable consumers with cash transfers and
emergency liquidity - allowing the transfer of funds with limited physical contact.
The financial sectors having the potential to be impacted by Fintech
A number of financial sectors that have the potential of being affected or are already affected by
the advancement of FinTech into the global market. These sectors include, business process
outsourcing, Investment and capital market markets, financial media and data solutions,
payments, HR and payroll technology, Digital lending, Security Technology. However, the four
major sectors that are of great interest are digital lending, payments, blockchain and digital
wealth management. This is because rapid pace of growth, disruptions in technological
advancement, and regulatory as well as other risks centered around them.
a. Digital lending. This is a nonbank technology lending. New companies can now
favorably compete with the traditional banks by providing juicy new offerings to
potential clients through providing access to expansive data, considerable computing
power, among others. The companies that participate in lending have digital platforms to
facilitate the lending and their clientele includes consumers and SMEs with sources of
funds being individuals and institutional investors. (Scott Kessler, 2016)
b. Payments. The rapid advancement of smartphones and the emergence of mobile
payments and blockchain technology have driven innovation across the payment systems
affecting majorly three areas as, credit and debit card transactions for examples, banks
like KCB Uganda now have debit cards that can facilitate online payments and transfers,
person-to-person payments; this is a transfer of funds from one person to another using
either debit/credit cards or Automated Clearing House system and finally In-store retail
payments which are facilitated through smartphone Apps like Apple pay and Starbucks.
(Panno, 2016)
Important to note is that the most affected payment system is the person-to-person payment.
c. Blockchain. This is simply summed up as decentralization through a shared ledger of
transactions. It consists of three main components; peer-to-peer network with groups that
are randomized, a digital ledger or database, and third parties. For example, unlike in the
past when ordering for a car ride wasn’t decentralized, today it is as easy as opening an
Uber or Safe Boda App in your connected gadget and ordering for your ride by dropping
your pin for your location and all drivers within your reached are alerted. This had
eliminated the need for an intermediary taxi firm as details of all the transactions are
authenticated (distance, price, and time).
d. Digital wealth management. As the investment and capital markets sector continues to
expand, one of the key dynamic discussions is the disruption of the traditional wealth
management. Tech firms like Robo-Advisors have developed automated, agile
technology that is rapidly changing how wealth can be managed. Over time, the
traditional wealth management focuses on wealthier clients whereas, the digital advisors
appeal to younger clients and the mass affluent demographic. The rise of digital wealth
management has created an industry shift from active to passive investment management.
The proportion of assets that are managed passively have significantly risen in the recent
past. Much as FinTech companies are just a small part of the broader wealth management
space, their level of influence in wealth management is expected to grow bigger across
the globe.
Conclusion
However, as we have shown in this paper, provision still lags behind theory - there remains a
great need to narrow the gap and also deepen understanding. It has advanced in terms of
recognizing the need for products that meet the preferences and circumstances of poor people -
access to ‘lump sums’, regular and small savings and repayments, appreciating the importance of
incentives and commitment to sustainability. However, it remains weak on developing processes
that rapidly identify high quality ‘new products’ and on mechanisms for increasing depth of
outreach. The first ‘microfinance revolution’ has shown that the ‘poor are bankable’ – the second
revolution is faced with the challenge of showing that it is possible to offer a set of financial
services to the poor that meet their livelihood needs. (Matin, Hulme, & Rutherford, 1999)